►
Description
Group Discussion: UnixFS and what comes next? - Data and IPFS: Models - https://2022.ipfs-thing.io
----------------------------------------
Missed last year's IPFS þhing? Register to attend IPFS þhing 2023 in Brussels, Belgium here: https://2023.ipfs-thing.io/
A
Ideally,
article
is
able
to
handle
this
and
have
handled
new
things
without
it
being
like
traumatic
and
files
reportability,
because
their
device,
a
lot
and
I
just
gave
a
call,
we're
actually
uploading.
You
know
bit
Farms
koalas
over
gateways.
It's
easy
because
they're
bites
directories
are
more
complicated.
A
Remember
that
one
of
the
challenges
we
used
first
was
like
unixfest
was
trying
to
preserve
Unix,
there's
other,
whether
there's
other
operas
that
are
not
mixed,
which
we
don't
very
well
support
at
the
moment
and
you're
always
validated
about
files
which
is
different
in
the
operating
system.
The
environment
is
working,
it's
unclear
if
you
want
to
preserve
them
or
not,
and
you
have
siblings
and
different
kind
of
links
which
are
not
the
links
that
we
are
talking
about,
the
operating
system
and
so
I
think
so
we
already
actually
typed
it.
A
A
A
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we're
just
almost
clear
on
the
distinction
of
metadata
for
the
file
or
like
the
metadata
for
the
file
into
the
complex
photographers,
because
there's
metadata
on
a
file.
Essentially
that
is
like
internal
specific
yep
yeah,
totally
simple
yeah
want
to
make
sure
that
the
line
is
there
that
we're
kind
of
the
metadata
is
above
the
files
and
whatever.
A
Yeah
I
think
I
think
that's
totally
where
the
metadata
lives
and
how
many
layers
of
it
which
things
it
belong
to
doesn't
seem
controversial,
though,
to
say
that
the
people
would
want
a
to
have
hdid
that
point
to
like
the
bikes
without
metadata.
It
may
also
want
something
with
the
metadata,
but
like
it
doesn't
do
a
lot
of
context.
A
So
when
Parts
into
the
image
to
find
data-
and
that
depends
right.
So
if
you
use
a
JPEG
okay,
it's
easier
for
you
to
put
in
the
image
and
that's
part
of
the
definition
of
the
image
as
long
as
we're
not
trying
to
like
reading
and
pull
out
metadata
and
cut
it
out
from
something
that
already
did
and
like
we're
just
talking
about
stuff
that
we're
adding
on
top,
then
yeah,
okay
and
I
I
would
contest
that
only
one
case
of
metadata,
there's
no
family
I
think
most
of
the
time
people
want.
A
Actually,
a
pointer
to
the
thing:
improving
the
funding,
really
annoying
horrible
right
now
completely
is
like
I
think
it's
not
in
the
right
way,
which
is
why
you
need
the
best
stuff
to
think
there's
a
directory.
If
you
don't
have
a
directory,
you
don't
have
a
file
name
and
that
regularly
creates
problems.
It
seem
a
lot
like
my
so
like
I
have
a
I
have
a
PowerPoint.
This
is
like
you
know:
I
need
a
cool
presentation
and
then
I
send
it
to
you.
A
But
my
point
is
that
if
you
send
me
a
link,
I
want
to
have
the
information
that
you
hold.
It
means
yeah
is
I,
feel
like
my
contention
is
only
that
I
think
that
people
will
want
to
have
a
reference
that
allows
them
to
get
Justified.
They
may
also
want
references
that
give
them
other
things
that
the
bite
seems
like
apparently,
I
think
this
is
also
something
of
the
transport
weekend
or
like
when
it
goes
to
this
office
would
probably
not
to
break
blocks.
A
One
thing
it
would
be
really
nice
here
is
like
it's
like
Grafton
he's
kind
of
Overkill
from
a
lot
of
the
stuff,
but
like
meeting
wrestling
where
it's
like
I
can
describe
very
simple,
like
I
need
this
small
path
here.
This
makes
all
the
blocks
all
the
way
down
to
this
thing.
That's
it
with
all
this,
because
then
you
can
just
say,
like
you
want
this
file
I.
A
A
If
you
provide
the
information
about
that,
then
the
user
agent
will
show
progress,
so
I'd
say
size
is
more
important
and
if
the
problem
is
how
we
represent
Wellness,
where
the
size
lives
in
the
directory
three,
so
right
now
in
the
unixfest
we
have
in
the
root
note,
you
have
information
about
the
total
size
of
some
dogs,
but
that's
wrong.
Data
of
the
file
plus
back
with
the
envelopes.
Okay
and
there's
no
way
to
know
the
size
of
the
file
itself
without
fetching
some
blocks
and
that's
why?
A
It
should
account
for
that
and
you
should
account
for
enumerating
directories
in
a
more
separated
way,
because,
right
now
we
in
respect
like
we
had
to
write
a
guideline.
That's
a
paragraph
have
Behavior
understood,
don't
shoot
themselves
in
the
food
and
not
touch
them
carry
of
drugs
because
they
may
not
think
one
step
ahead
and
I
think
if
we
had
something
better
avoids
this
problem,
so
you
need
to
think
about
size
as
part
of
us.
A
So,
what's
preventing
us
from
having
like
the
meditative
books
like
next
to
the
file
like,
add
a
link
and
then
end
the
directory,
so
the
directory
itself
can
point
to
metadata
and
work
as
it's
not
like
the
most
useful
competitive
name
and
then
as
well
as
the
point
they're
like
going
to
more
metadata
for
a
file
as
well
as
the
point
to
the
broadbands.
So
if
you
wanted
to
give
someone
just
a
single
file,
you
give
them
the
link
of
metadata
as
a
file.
A
A
A
This
is
also
going
to
the
method
of
the
block,
and
if
you
think
that,
for
example,
maybe
slightly
important
when
the
Wi-Fi
equation,
you
can
put
mine
guy
to
just
yeah
I
just
have
a
question:
do
we
find
we
tend
to
have
been
really
slow,
spend
the
time
that
we
have
to
talking
about
like
what
are
the
right
ways?
We
want
to
like
structure
data
concretely
or
what
are
the
ways
in
which
you
might
want
to
like
deal
with
these
things
obstructed,
because
my
suspicion
is
there's
not
a
right
answer.
A
A
So
they
can
work
multiple
scenarios,
as
opposed
to
like,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
agree
on
like
the
less
correct
way
to
do
it,
because
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
find
that
that's
really
hard
assistant
I,
don't
know
like
you
know,
Brendan
I,
don't
know
what
you
guys
have
been
working
in
classes.
Yeah
I
mean
I.
My
so
I
think
the
foreign.
A
The
name
of
the
file
the
size
of
the
device
includes
some
Unix,
specifically
permissioning
bits
and
some
other
bits
but
like
if
you
think
about
us
as
an
iOS
implementation,
it
shakes
out
a
lot
of
these
details
like
requirements,
side
of
things,
then
the
other
side,
the
one
thing
I
would
sort
of
push
back
on
a
little
bit
is
like
I,
don't
want
to
optimize
for
giving
everybody
every
choice.
A
little
sudden
I
do
think.
Having
more
opinions
here
actually
did
help
us
shape
the
directionality
and
the
intention
of
this
technology.
A
A
A
It's
like
the
ability
is
aside
from
this
conversation,
but
I
think
those
are
the
things
that
would
be
nice
to
see
if
we're
talking
about
a
B2
or
something
we're
gonna
make
great
changes,
and
what
are
we
going
to
offer
I
would
love
us
to
discuss
what
what
does
it
look
like
to
say:
hey?
Can
we
actually
do
encryption,
and
can
we
put
that
in
b20s?
A
A
A
A
So
you
know
like
concrete
implementation,
currently
yeah
and
so
you're
proposing,
which
is
only
working
there.
But
how
is
that
different
than
just
like
media
and
different
videos?
It's
similar
different
properties,
but
just
encrypts
things
are
better
communicated
differently.
It's
not
super
different
okay,
I
think
like
in
iteration
of
this,
that
I
talked
I,
think
with
Eric
about
I.
A
Think
he
probably
proposes
to
me
was
like
like
what,
if
what,
if
you
have
like
a
really
base
structure
of
like
a
directory,
does
whatever
mappings
half
of
like
violent
of
like
names,
just
the
next
thing,
but
like
we've
also
have
like
again
sort
of
in
like
the
young
interface
style
of
like
try
again
like
does
it
have?
Does
it
have
metadata
here?
Also
yeah
data?
A
Oh
well,
let's
move
on,
and
and
if
we
just
if
we
Define
like
sort
of
like
the
union
of
like
I,
don't
know
like
the
interfacing
thing
that
mean
a
directory
right
sort
of
like
the
ilfs
thing,
but
like
the
different
places
that
we're
willing
to
like
make
that
tribe,
then
it
looks
sort
of
maybe
you
know,
sort
of
thing.
I
want
to
connect
our
directory
and
on
stack,
remember,
I.
A
Think
I'm
saying
something
similar
to
what
you're
saying
but
like
the
thing
is
the
pattern
that
I'm
noticing,
but
don't
I'm,
not
convinced
this
is
the
right
path.
Is
it
like
what
we're
really
interested
in
this
common
access
patterns?
Right,
like
we
didn't
pop,
like
that's
an
access
pattern,
we
know
is
a
thing
that
we
want.
A
We
know
that
by,
as
you
said,
files
are
just
buttons
right,
but
they
also
might
have
metadata.
So
is
there
a
common
interface
to
what
we
all
say
is
a
file
and
then
that's
where
I
I
didn't
this
one's,
throw
out
all
the
layers
of
the
train
and
not
worry
about
coming?
That's
maybe
else
and
whatnot.
Can
you
get
from
the
bytes
to
the
access
pattern
like
as
long
as
you
can
do
that
like
that?
That's
what
matters,
but
that
requires
being
able
to
define
a
common
access
pattern.
A
That's
for
files
and
directories
that
we
can
all
agree
on
and
I
I
don't
can
we
do
that
I
mean
the
files.
Are
you
you
said
before
those
clock
files
are
just
bikes,
but
then
we
said
maybe
is,
of
course
this
pocket
immediately
merged.
There's
something
else,
and
you
also
like
at
least
the
go
experience
that
was
interesting,
because
originally
files
were
a
bytes
node
and
we
realized
well,
not
files
are
very
large
ones.
You
need
to
have
the
common
ways
of
interacting
with
them
that
you
do
with
files
like
seeking
readings.
A
May
or
may
not
be
helpful,
but
we're
focusing
a
lot
on
the
file
system
when
what
it
sounds
like
can.
I,
probably
actually
ever
happened
right.
So
if
we're
going
to
go
General
how
General
do
you
want
to
go
so
that,
like
as
just
as
a
fun
another
question
like
we're
going
all
the
way
from
constant
implementation,
all
the
way
up
to
arbitrary
right
and
like
maybe
we
should
try
to
Define
that.
A
Be
more
specific
because
I
think
like
what
else
is
doing
things
there's
crossing
right,
but
then
there's
like
what
happens
when
you
hit
the
end
of
the
tunnel.
So
if
you
hit
the
end
of
the
tunnel,
a
pile
of
bytes
a
render
a
ball
if
I
hit
the
end
of
the
tunnel
and
it's
a
directory,
maybe
I
try
and
turn
it
into
a
car
file
or
something
I.
Don't
know.
A
A
A
A
Yeah
and
that's
good
right,
but
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
not
that
having
the
standard
is
not
important.
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
99.99
of
all
users
we're
going
to
use
one
file
system
and
they
want
a
file
system
that
works.
They
don't
want
to
care.
They
don't
want
to
care
about
office
and
My
worry
is
right.
Now
is
like
and
Unix
the
best
to
a
certain
extent
does
this
today.
A
If
you
do
build
these
exercises,
they
can
be
interoperable
Josh
to
start
with,
like
extensible
systems.
So
if
you
start
from
the
consensible
file
system,
where,
like
I,
can
at
least
add
custom
file
types
in
that,
not
everyone
will
understand,
then
you
can
plug
that
into
something
like
proteins,
looking
out
their
treatment
to
a
bit
more
than
your
contact
understanding
or
like
a
version
like
translate
something
else
to
wasm
and
that's
just
an
option.
A
You
can
add
up
later
I
think
which
is
like,
if
you're
going
to
make
like
an
infraction
of
things,
to
just
make
another
ADL
for
it
and
then
so.
We
can
have
a
concrete
implementation
that
works
well
for
like
99.99
use
cases,
and
then
we
can
prototype
with
different
new
things
and
then,
if
you
want
to
try
with
something
else
and
just
float
a
different
video
that
way,
I
think
yeah,
so
I
think.
If
we're
talking
about
inspections,
we
need
to
think
about.
A
It's
trying
to
be
trying
to
fit
into
the
apis
that
you're
building
spices
has.
Then
you
have
the
problems
when
you're
trying
to
take
the
solar
system
to
a
different
place,
for
example
in
the
browser
using
a
gameplay
and
like
their
the
extraction,
may
be
not
that's
100
Unix
in
this
case
so
I
mean
that's
right.
A
Sorry,
because
you
have
my
times
sometimes
like
those
website,
for
example,
but
if
you
want
to
have
a
browsable
kind
of
cloud
system,
looking
thing
that
is
fine,
yeah,
yes,
but
like
like
any
possible
with
metadata,
you
can
solve
one
personal
one
of
those
kinds
of
problems
right,
but
maybe
to
illustrate
the
point.
Let's
say:
You
must
have
the
encryption
yeah.
A
A
So
when
we
built
Warehouse,
we
added
encryption
version
that
we
needed
and
it
didn't
work,
but
so
we
have
to
round
it
by.
We
created
a
pretty
trade
that
then
removes
all
the
extra
stuff
and
we
build
a
version
of
the
latest
snapshot
in
just
regular
units
of
us
and
it's
a
bit
of
a
household,
but
it
worked
and
it's
essentially
like
a
horrible
hack
around
version
of
what
we
wish
could
happen
at
runtimes
in
ADL
or
gateways.
A
A
A
A
Like
use
this
program
to
translate
this
stuff,
even
if
you
don't
know
what
this
program
is
all
right,
I
just
want
to
clarify
what
you're
trying
to
describe
yeah,
because
I
don't
understand
it.
Do
you
want
to
The
View
you
want
to
embed.
Is
that
the
get
history,
the
victory
or
is
it
the
raw
files
that
used
to
watch
well
like
they
can
trade
and
be
straight?
A
So,
if
you're
doing
this
unit
investment
we're
just
going
to
get
pretty
we're
getting
this
one
at
Best,
when
we
do
the
get
history
as
well,
because
we
have
that
and
like
you
should
be
able
to
basically
write
a
translation
lets.
You
view
it
like.
The
problem
is
like:
if
you
just
do
that
in
your
application,
then
you
have
to
support
every
single
file
system
in
your
application.
A
The
nice
thing
about
having
the
instruction
layer
is
that
okay,
someone
can
write
this
once
in
wasm
and
then
we'll
be
linked
to
one
of
these
things.
You'll
specify
and
here's
the
information
you
want
to
use.
Someone
else
maybe
use
their
website
browser
and
it
just
works
right,
but
are
we
going
to
put
version
into
the
abstract
you're?
Probably
not,
but
we
probably
do
want
Network
gifts.
A
So
why
wouldn't
I
do
that
at
the
app
location
for
when,
if
that's,
basically,
what
version
price
so
I
would
I
would
just
back
up
and
so
I'll
be
very
brilliant,
so,
okay
yeah,
the
goal
is
not
to
find
every
possible
thing
that
we
could
want
to
abstract.
It's
more
likely
of
all
the
things
you
can
imagine
abstracting.
How
many
of
these
can
we
agree
on
right?
All
of
the
metadata.
No,
the
concept
of
packing
through
directors,
God
I,
hope
so
right
are
there
any
other
things
that
are
that
agreeable?
A
A
A
I
meant
that
I,
don't
think
focusing
our
time
right
now
on
obstructions.
It
was
actually
that
useful,
because
the
problems
that
we
need
so
professional,
conclude
and
and
I'd
rather
have
like
get
as
many
people
as
many
other
people
working
on
one
Advanced
system,
accommodation
and
it
is
still
called
ipfs.
So
for
me
the
canonical
thing
in
igfest
is
a
file
system
that
works
so
and
right
now,
just
like
I
guess
everything.
So
it's
a
valid
point.
A
There
is
this
tension
that
exists,
I,
I,
think
I,
don't
know
whether
it
was
near
somebody
else
who
said
this
on,
like
the
opening
day.
I
think
one
of
the
tensions
that,
like
this,
this
like
Conference
of
a
whole
like
expresses,
is
figuring
out
the
boundaries
between
like
where
it
is
helpful
for
us
to
agree
on
a
thing
and
where
it's
helpful
for
us
for,
like
Divergent
explosions
and
related
to
that
is
this
like
yeah,
I'm
non-technical,
but
human-based
problem
around
like
do
I
want
to
invest.
When
is
the?
A
What
is
the
appropriate
amount
of
resources
to
invest
in
getting
agreement
on
building
a
thing
and
putting
all
of
the
frames
on
one
problem
which
comes
with
the
trade-off
that
you
get
PCS
is
like
agreement
forward
versus?
Is
there
something
smaller
that
you
can
get
from
silicone
that
ends
up
ends
up
unlocking
more
time
in
the
end
and
like
I,
don't
know
where
the
boundaries
for
that?
But
that's
like
this.
A
That's
like
the
stress
that
is
the
tension
between
like
your
approach
and
the
one
I'm
not
picking
for
and
like
I
I
like
I,
feel
that
I
feel
that
when
I
look
at
like
I,
don't
know
it
was
like
a
thousand
ways
like
that's
a
lot
better
like
this
protocol
is
super.
Dumb
implementations
could
be
way
smarter
right,
but
then,
let's
make
more
data
types.
I
mean
there's
good
reasons
to
do
that.
A
That's
always
a
problem,
but
there's
a
good
point
where,
like
yeah,
we
can
kind
of
forget
like
I,
would
like
that
simple
white,
but
no
one
really
really
wants
to
be
able
to
get.
It
might
be
us
and
honestly,
no
one
probably
wants
a
really
really
good
might
be
best
would
be
nice,
but
it's
not
okay,
so
so
I,
so
I,
I,
agree
and
I
disagree.
So
I
don't
want
I,
don't
think
it's
important
for
me
to
be
able
to
like
have
a
you
know,
Megan
directory
thing
that
has
a
bit
foreign.
A
A
And
then
pull
it
from
places
and
use
like
pop
in
a
dressing
right
like
we
have
these
tools
that
are
unlocking
like
that.
That
can
unlock
experimentation
both
in
in
new
things,
but
also
so
I'm,
also
advocating
that,
like
the
old
I,
think
the
old
things
have
value,
especially
if
you
choose
the
old
ones
which
are
large,
but
there's
also
the
new
things
that
are
coming,
that
we
can
hopefully
be
prepared
for
by
leveraging
the
old
popular
thing.
A
A
A
Later
right,
why
does
why
did
winfs
not
become
UNICEF
best
feature
like
do
we
have
a
people
problem
if
we're
not
accepting
changes
to
the
standard
pieces,
quick
enough
like
or
or
like
really
decide
that
a
capability
that
we
want
people
to
be
able
to
have
is
to
is
to
to
like
be
able
to
you
know,
have
versioning
and
and
encryption,
but
like
the
gateways
would
be
able
to
to
read
winfs
natively.
If
the
people
who
are
writing
the
gateways
updated
their
software
to
to
run
them.
A
So
is
that,
like
protocol
Labs
is
controlling
big
ones,
not
moving
fast
enough
or
like
what's
wrong?
I
would
like
to
investigate
it.
I,
don't
think
it's
done
yeah
as
far
as
I
understand,
yeah
yeah,
but,
like
I,
think
the
main
thing
we
would.
We
would
still
need
to
avoid
to
Unix
that
as
permanent
invest
in
some
way.
A
So
there's
two
cases
there's
the
public
stuff
and
the
private
stuff,
the
the
things
that
require
Keys,
the
ipfs
URI
has
no
spaces.
Like
my
two
cents,
the
main
tragedy
of
Ip
has
fallen
is
that
there
is
no
escaping
scheme
at
all,
which
means
like
we
got
what
we
got
and
we're
like
kind
of
locked
in
or
you
break
someone
which
is
which
is
like
real
science,
and
so
you
could
do
this.
A
You
could
take
and
you've
written
the
code
for
this
right,
the
the
the
the
the
let
me
try
out
and
see
if
this
is
UNIX,
fs
and
then
fall
back
into
the
data
model
code
can,
if
perhaps
properly
constructive
and
depending
on
exactly
the
particular
the
file
one
FS
were,
can
we
can
do
the
thing
that
says:
try
it
out,
it
doesn't
look
like.
Does
it
look
like
you
next
episode.
A
This
is
like
you
know,
this
becomes
increasingly
difficult
without
signaling
mechanisms
and
the
signaling
mechanisms
are
part
of
the
extraction
story.
What
am
I
signaling
to
you
unless
we
had
a
community
space
yeah
and
if
you
add
a
new
name
space,
then
you
get
into
the
everybody
hates
US
territory.
Yes,.
A
Colon
slash,
slash
wnfs
or
index
FS,
slash
click.
We
can't
repeat
that
why?
Okay,
this
is
the
first
thing
has
to
be
the
origin
right,
yeah
yeah.
They
could
do
something
like
CID
dot,
city.s
yeah,
that's
the
custom
problems
with
file.
Extensions,
don't
be
exactly
like
that
cool,
we'll,
actually
understand
what
we
need.
It's
not
a
bad
idea.
It
messes
with
ipns,
because
people
using
items
targets,
but
it's
wonderful
thing
that
there
was
nobody
will
never
be
done.
A
A
Yeah
faces
and
all
that
so
but
I
feel
like
that's
a
very
soluble
problem,
especially
if
we
have
a
limited
set
of
things
that
we
want
to
put
just
yeah.
I
I,
really
don't
see
the
problem
just
saying
wislash
and
just
saying
that
that's
a
good
thing.
The
thing
is
it.
You
could
remember
any
separate,
maybe
a
bit
problematic.
A
A
A
A
So
so
we
can
do
a
little
bit,
but
I
would
definitely
like
put
stuff.
I
I
would
suggest,
put
asynchronous
ideas.
It's
like
now,
so
you
can.
You
know
in
case
there's
a
lot
of
people
yeah,
even
if
it's
just
now,
if
they
give
you
meds
to
to
maybe
do
it
then
you'll
see
people
as
they
walk
out
of
the
room.
That
you're
like
I'd,
like
to
understand
what
you're
talking
about.