►
From YouTube: Package Managers WG 2019-09-03
B
Sure
so,
I've
mostly
been
trading
on
Allen's
toes
and
I've,
been
treading
on
my
toes
all
over
some
PR
suggest.
I
give
s
so
I've
been
trying
to
land
the
adding
via
async
iterators,
which
has
men,
yeah,
updating
some
other
modules
as
well.
So
the
because
you've
got
a
whole
bunch
of
like
outstanding
module
upgrades
that
we
need
to
perform.
B
So
in
order
to
get
the
async
iterate
offering,
because
we've
changed
slightly,
how
things
work
around
like
adding
strings
and
stuff
so
now,
you're
gonna
be
able
to
like
add
a
string,
and
that
string
is
going
to
appear
as
the
file
contents
of
the
file
he
was
added.
But
the
interface
tests
say
that
you
shouldn't
be
outside
strings
because
at
some
point
in
the
dim
and
distant
past
they
were
treated
as
parts
and
it
was
as
either
ten
either
add
from
FS
function
and
then
remove
the
ability
to
add
a
string.
B
B
Basically,
the
integration
see
the
interface
tests
need
updating
to
accept
strings,
but
to
do
that,
we
need
to
update
it
in
chairs
of
your
essence
and
dudes
that
we
need
to
upgrade
either
first,
the
CTL
in
all
the
various
libraries
they
use
it.
So
because
the
changes
go
across
the
HTTP
client
and
they
go
across
the
call
implementation
itself.
B
B
Now,
there's
gonna
finish
his
PR.
That
adds
that
support,
which
is
going
to
be
super
nice
and
that's
going
to
affect
how
the
well
it
was
affecting
how
I
was
starting
to
change
the
modules
so
a
chance
to
change
the
ad
methods
will
route
via
this
async
iterator
method,
so
yeah.
That
is
me
any
questions.
C
C
A
So
last
week,
II
demoed
an
implementation
of
a
tool
that
allows
people
to
verify
that
packages
like
a
package
release
is
kosher,
I
guess
so
it's
it's
kind
of
like
it's
kind
like
a
website,
I
guess
where
people
can
it
sort
of
works
a
little
bit
like
the
way
that
get
a
pull
request,
work
and
that
you
can
sort
of
like
approve
release
and
then
it's
got
a
whole
like
trust
system
that
he
set
up
and
he's
kind
of
kind
of
experimenting
with
I.
A
B
Also,
something
interesting
has
happened.
Is
Michaels
opened
a
pull
request
against
Cena
capacity,
one
spec
to
add
metadata
to
the
file
objects,
which
is
quite
cool,
and
so
it's
starting
with
the
mode
or
permissions
and
then
a
bunch
of
like
time,
stuff
so
modified
time,
access
time,
creation
time,
that
kind
of
thing
and
there's
a
bit
of
back
and
forth
on
whether
or
not
these
things
are
actually
worth,
including
you
know
if
they
just
do
more
harm
than
good,
so
that
some
progress,
then.
C
I
think
this
would
be
kind
of
a
like.
I
will
do
something
because
we
need.
We
need
that
in
the
exercise,
but
we
do
need
creation
times
or
modification
times
and
we
need
likely
be
modes.
We
probably
don't
need
user
names,
but
like
we
do
it
once
we
may
not
be
happy
with
where
we
put
the
potato,
because
if
there's
a
list
of
a
ton
like,
if
you
put
it
the
file,
if
you
put
it
the
directory,
to
put
it
another
block
like
how
do
you
deal
with
all
this?
C
I'm
I'm
less
concerned
about
that
I
think
we
might
just
might
not
have
it
it's
like
what
a
lot
of
subdue
is
the
e
cycle
well
tax
time,
but
I
think
they'd
be
either
like
fuzz
it
or
like
it's
like.
If
the
access
time
is
newer
than
the
multiplication
time,
I
didn't
record.
Another
isotope
I
can
work.
Sorry
how
that
works.
C
C
You
add
a
file
by
default.
You
can
tell
them
by
like,
or
maybe
you
get
like
default
modes
like
so
you
like
a
default,
execute
there's
like
that
yeah,
but
then
like.
If
you
need
these,
then,
like
you
feel
like
mount,
that's
like
with
a
flag
that
allows
you
to
it
like
have
certain
custom
attributes,
but
not
the
rest
of
them.
Yeah.
B
C
Cuz
like,
but
most
the
time
like
you
don't
know
you
these,
this
is
really
like.
Active
interests
need
them,
archives
need
them,
but
like
farm
styling
and
website
at
you,
fast
I,
don't
care
about
these
things
and,
like
honestly,
most
the
tools.
I
use,
don't
use
access
time
through
modification
because
they
tend
not
to
be,
though
they're,
reliable
anyways.
So
all
these
tools
are
just
relying
on
like
a
has
to
check
some
changed.
It
hasn't
changed.
Okay,
fine.
B
D
What's
the
path
for
I
don't
know
putting
a
deadline
on
the
bike
or
letting
the
bike
should
go
on
for
just
long
enough.
That
is
useful
and
then
getting
everyone
to
commit
such
that
we
can
make
progress
on.
D
Would
like
to
propose
that
we
push
this
meeting
back
by
15
minutes,
or
so
it
now
overlaps
with
an
extended
gateway,
tea
meeting.
That
makes
it
a
little
bit
difficult
to
leave.
Leave
that
meeting
and
come
to
this
meeting
so
I
mean
they're
gonna,
be
15
minutes
late
to
this
one
or
leave
that
one
15
minutes
early,
so
I
would
prefer
if
there
were
no
conflict,
and
we
don't
seem
to
take
up
a
full
hour
any
more.
E
D
But
I
don't
think
this
meeting
is
gonna
take
a
full
hour
or
it
hasn't
been.
It's
been
taking
half
an
hour.
You
currently
have
an
hour
scheduled
for
that's
great
yeah,
less
meeting,
okay,
I'll,
stick
it
in
the
chapters,
so
other
people
who
aren't
here
can
thumbs
up
it
as
well,
but
generally
will
either
push
back
by
15
or
30
minutes.
D
D
And
so
we
we
are
getting
close
to
the
end
of
the
quarter,
so
I
think
a
good
opportunity
to
look
at
the
things
that
we
take
it
on
and
say:
hey
this
thing
was
important
he's
like
someone
else
who
can
pick
it
up
and
take
it
on
as
an
owner.
It's
it
more
important
than
the
last
month
of
q3
work
that
someone
else
is
planning
to
do
or
hey
I'm,
really
not
going
into
this
cuz.