►
From YouTube: Istio Networking WG meeting - 2018-06-21
Description
Agenda
- Playback/request for feedback on istioctl proxy-* commands
- Pilot Decomposition Epic
- Critical issue triage for 1.0
A
So
thanks
everybody
for
joining
the
easter
networking
community
meeting.
We
have
actually
a
very
light
agenda
today.
So
first
item
is
to
look
at
some
critical
issues
and
do
a
bit
of
trash.
And
the
second
item
is
some
feedback
requests
on
East,
your
CTL
proxy
commands,
so
I'm
not
sure.
If
Liam
are
you
are
you
in
the
meeting
I
think
it
was
you
who
had
it
out
and
okay
cool
cool
and
if
there
is
anything
else,
please
edit
here,
the
voice
would
probably
be
able
to
finish
a
bit
earlier
than
the
normal.
A
B
Me
the
proxy
states
is
like
this
I'm
gonna,
weird
branch,
but
I
haven't
updated
to
master
that
I've
just
realized,
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
use
kind
of
a
custom,
build
and
just
do
the
proxy
company
stuff,
but
I
can
leave
I
did
a
hacking
into
actually
I
don't
know.
I
will
quickly
check
that
the
proxy
conflict
command
is
working
in
my
current
builds.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
What
what
is
actually
showing
this
is
showing
all
the
status
of
all
the
envoys,
but
it's
getting
it
from
pilot.
So
yes
or
we
store
the
nonce,
which
is
basically
the
time
of
which
the
last
up
they
were
sent
and
then
envoy
responds
saying,
with
the
next
discovery
request
request
acknowledging
that
it
has
received
that
status
update.
B
So
we're
not
sending
routes
at
all
to
egress
gateways
and
ingress
gateways,
because
I
believe
they
don't
request
to
watch
routes.
So
you
can
see
there,
it's
not
been
sent.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
high
level
I
want
to
see
everything.
That's
going
on
my
mesh.
You
can
filter
by
proxy
ID,
so
you
can
just
if
you
wanted
to
the
details,
one
you
just
do
SEO
CTR
proxy
status,
details
v1
whatever
with
the
dot
namespace
on
the
end,
and
then
it
will
just
sync
to
that
one.
B
B
B
So
this
kind
of
splits
up
stuff,
so
this
is
basically
all
just
summarizing
information
from
the
config
dump
from
envoy.
It
will
show
you
kind
of
a
high
level
thing
and
then
you
can
filter
like
run
bots.
So
if
I
did
ninety
eighty,
which
will
show
me
all
things,
will
clusters
with
four
ninety
eighty
which
isn't
in
itself
particularly
useful,
but
if
I
filter
by
poor,
give
me
three,
for
instance,
and
then
ask
for
Jason
it'll
dump
out
the
entire
all
done
by
the
config
for
that
specific
cluster.
B
B
So
this
news
of
Quadra,
sport
and
type
and
then
be
the
same.
You
can
just
stick
a
Oh
Jason,
but
you
can
filter
on
whatever
and
go
in
and
actually
look
at
the
confidante
for
a
specific
thing.
There's
obviously
lots
here
because
I
just
dumped
everything,
so
you
can
go
in
and
look
at
that
specific
thing.
Now
there
is
a
bug
you
can
see
here
where
it's
gone
really
far
to
the
right.
That's
a
bug
with
frogs
above
which
I've
raised
against
them.
B
So
hopefully
that
looks
fixed
eventually
and
then
you
can
do
summary
of
routes
as
well
so
routes
I'm.
Not
this
is
just
the
RDS
routes,
so
this
won't
give
you
the
routes
that
are
in
line
with
listeners.
There's
only
name
and
the
amount
of
virtual
hosts
I
put
in
summary,
and
you
can
get
the
full
conflict
on
these
in
the
Oh
Jason
I've
done
enough
influence
that
yeah
but
I'm
open
to
what
information
is
available
in
the
summary
commands,
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
asking
for
and
then
eventually
the
idea
would
be.
B
We
can
do
some
kind
of
like
proxy
div
for
proxy
convictive
or
something
and
the
idea
would
be
it-
takes
there
dynamic
clusters
from
the
Envoy
config
dump
from
the
API,
and
then
it
compares
them
to
what
pilot
gives
as
a
risk
would
give
you
as
a
response.
If
you
came
as
that
proxy
and
then
week
and
if
those
to
work
out
kind
of
what
exactly
is
I
would
think,
but
that's
kind
of
a
bit
further
down
the
line,
I'm
just
kind
of
looking
for
the
summary,
your
feedback
on
the
summary.
B
B
Yeah
there
is
I,
know
Andrew.
You
raised
an
issue
for
basically
having
ongoing
for
Unicode
cluster
and
it
dumping
its
full
config
to
a
basically
to
a
binary,
so
a
user
could
send
it
over
and
then
basically
as
a
config
dump
for
their
entire
mesh.
So
we
can
then
debug
it.
We
are
live
in
that
as
well
at
some
point
but
yeah.
This
is
just
generally
for
this
stuff
and
I'ma
stop
rambling.
Unless
someone
else
talk,
this.
A
Is
super
useful
and,
like
super
exciting,
and
it's
great
to
have
this-
you
know
like
I-
think
we
really
need
really
need
to
get
better
at
troubleshooting,
and
that
will
help
us
like
it
just
in
general
development
plus
whenever
this
would
be
running
production
battle.
I'd
be
awesome
really,
and
it
is
already
awesome
like
this.
What
we
have
yes
and
so
Bay,
based,
like
my
question,
related
to
your
question
about
the
issue
I
open.
A
So
that
is
exactly
to
help
with
the
troubleshooting
when,
whenever
this
is
run
on
a
big
cluster-
and
they
don't
know
exactly
what's
going
on,
you
know
what,
where?
Where
is
the
issue?
So
it
would
be
good
to
have
run
a
simple
command
and
gather
everything
from
pilot
and
from
all
the
employ
proxies
and
put
it
in
a
nice
binary.
Attach
it
to
the
github.
A
B
A
What
I
would
also
like
to
see
and
I'm
sure
this
is
possible
if
I'm
like,
for
instance,
I,
had
to
be
able
to
trace
a
particular
host
or
the
traffic
for
a
particular
yeah
floor
host
like
if
I
give
the
host
I'd
like
to
see
the
the
listener
you
know
associated
with
it
or
the
the
listener
throughout
the
class.
Certain
point
and
basically
be
able
to
understand.
Where
is
the
issue
and
ideally
across
multiple
right?
So
so,
basically
do
what
the
employ
does
internally,
but
more
of
from
a
theoretical
or.
B
B
A
B
E
F
F
The
good
braking
is
useful
here,
that's
more
like
statistics
from
on
way
and
not
like
you
know,
statistics
between
pilot
non-white
in
terms
of
the
SDS
protocols,
I
mean
those
would
belong
in
a
proper
dashboard
with
all
of
the
other
on
my
metrics
that
are
coming
in,
and
this
is
just
simply
listing
what
pilot
has
sent
and
what
has
been
act
in
the
protocol
exchange.
Yeah.
B
B
A
B
Yes
and
no
I,
don't
know
I
mean
sure
I'm
a
trying
about
this.
Actually,
whether
or
not
we're
doing
a
sto
dashboard
is
kind
of
like
a
coupe,
dashboard
type
thing
or
whatever
or
not.
We're
gonna
kind
of
talk
to
people
like
the
uncanny
team-
and
this
is
something
they
can
do-
is
on
that
type
of
thing.
It's
it's
basically,
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
do
some
form
of
lowest
common
denominator
is
vo
dashboard
type
thing.
B
But
the
informations
are
there,
you
just
have
to
have
you'd,
have
to
have
some,
probably
API
running
or
like
service
running
in
your
cluster.
That
exposes
this
information
on
the
API
somewhere.
Mm-Hmm,
hey
widget,
just
touched
me:
the
envoy
admin
API
this
one
in
the
proxy
states.
This
is
just
calling
on
this.
I
added
sync
the
endpoint
to
avoid,
and
you
just
call
that
and
you
can.
You
can
generate
all
of
the
stuff
from
that
information.
So
there's
no
reason
it
can't
be
done.
B
I
added
some
code
to
keep
track
of
that
so
on
each
connection,
there's
just
a
cluster
a
cluster
sent,
and
then
this
two
routes
whatever
and
endpoints,
and
then
it
just
dumps
all
that
information.
When
you
call
the
sing,
see
I'm
thing
and
you
just
have
to
go
through
each
pilot.
What
behind
the
console
that
does
that
goes
against
the
list
of
pilots
calls
each
one
of
them
on
the
sings,
the
end
point
and
then
just
combines
all
the
input
and
works.
Although.
G
B
Mean
we
don't
get
that
is
because
envoy
doesn't
expose
that
information
in
the
config
dump.
It
exposes
four
things
in
the
config
dump:
it
does
clusters
list
or
CD
s,
LD
s
RDS
and
the
bootstrap
config.
So
that's
kind
of
the
only
information
we
can
get
from
envoy
for
some
reason
envoy
doesn't
dump
that
I'm
sure
I
don't
know
well,
I,
don't
know
if
there
are
any
plans
for
envoy,
it's
dumpler.
So
what
are
you.
B
E
Term,
yes,
ideally
we
would
surface
in
Viacom
big
dump
there
you
go
the
slash
clusters
handler,
which
is
also
MIT's
Jason.
You
can
actually
pull
out
a
whole
bunch
of
it
effectively.
The
same
information
like
it
has
a
cluster
information
and
then
the
constituent
members
of
the
posture
add.
So
you
can
actually
look
at
the
individual
points
and
then
hammer
okay,
I'll,
take
a
look.
B
E
This
has
to
do
with
this
current
complexity.
At
the
time
this
was
implemented.
Endpoints
made
a
bit
differently
than
other
parts
of
the
system.
They
updated
independently
and
a
few
things
like
that.
But
the
iIRC
don't
know
that
for
the
full
context
you
don't
just
chose
map
pioneering
problems
with
this,
but
I
think
it's
certainly
something
we
could
add
and
if
someone
think
you're
sitting
doing
that
they
can
do
that,
but
we
have
effectively
equivalent
information
today.
A
B
E
Copic
dump
is
Mark
VIII
to
alpha
is
in
an
experimental
status;
it's
not
going
to
change
radically,
but
there's
a
PR
and
flight
right
now
who
rearranged
some
of
the
field.
So
you
might
see
you
might
as
the
occasional
breakage
and
now
we'll
continue,
probably
at
least
for
the
next
week
or
so
I'm
in
the
moment,
trying
to
actually
fix
up
a
bunch
of
pretty
terrible
stuff
to
do
with
actually
being
able
to
repast
that
Jason
back
into
protoform,
which
is
a
very
nice
too.
E
Probably
you
have,
but
right
now,
protobuf
itself
is
broken,
which
is
kind
of
exciting.
E
From
the
proto
in
and
envoy
to
the
Jason
to
another
proto,
it's
something
like
you
know:
you're
tall
or
somewhere
internal
monitoring
tools
and
that's
a
problem
that
has
you're
just
some
collocation
put
a
bath
where,
if
you
mess,
then
within
a
map
field
and
any
it
just
doesn't,
handle
them
correctly.
So,
and
this
isn't
that
nice.
I
B
Ideas
there
I
guess
so
what
this
is
doing,
so
it
works
with
NLCS.
Is
this
darts?
So
this
will
only
work.
The
coop,
because
cube
is
obviously
opinionate.
It's
on
how
it
does
stuff,
so
we
can
assume
where
stuff
is
to
what
it
does
is
under
the
covers.
It
does
a
cube
exact
into
the
co
constantly
new
container
and
then
calls
a
binary
on
SDO
or
called
the
issue
of
cotton
binary
and
a
command
on
there,
and
then
that
calls
the
local
envoy.
B
B
A
Okay,
that's
so
we
move
to
the
next
topic,
in
fact,
I
added,
something
which
I
hope
will
be
very
very
short.
So
some
people
asked
me
on
on
slack
about
the
work
on
valid
decomposition
because
they
would
like
to
follow
on
that
I'm
not
sure
like
if
the
same
people
aren't
here
but
I'd
like
to
describe
the
method
to
follow
up
on
this.
So
there
is
a
high-level
epic
that
I'm
sharing
now
I
hope
you're
able
to
see
it.
It's
called
mesh
configure
API
mesh,
config
protocol,
Politico
position,
epic
and
inside
of
this
epic.
A
There
are
multiple,
smaller
issues
which
are
equivalent
to
like
lower
level
tasks.
For
instance,
there
is,
there
is
one
to
define
the
mCP
server,
which
is
actually
already
committed
in
master.
There
is
another
one
to
extend
the
API,
for
instance,
with
an
envelope
to
contain
the
metadata
for
like
namespace
and
name
for
various
objects.
There
is
an
equivalent
one
for
the
mesh
config
protocol
client
in
pilot,
for
instance,
that's
going
to
be
a
very
small
small
change.
A
There
is
one
to
define
the
common
interface
between
the
ingestion
layer,
which
is
the
mCP
and
the
pilot
datastore.
So
I
only
created
issues
for
the
work
we
plan
to
do
in
1-0,
because
there
is
like
the
scope
is
larger,
so
we
need
to
do
the
migration
of
the
failures
in
process
adapter
sort
of
process,
but
there
is
no
not
a
particular
rest
to
that
before
one
zero.
Many
important
part
is
to
like
to
define
the
framework
so
yeah.
If
there
are
any
questions
around
that
like
please.
Let
me
know.
Oh.
A
Okay,
good
and
so
gluing
is
not
here,
but
he
added
an
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
called
critical
issue
triage
for
one
zero,
so
I
think
I
know
what
what
he
had
in
mind.
So
I'm
just
gonna
quickly
show
you
how
many
issues
we
have
it's
quite
scary,
actually
so
I
think
it
was
last
week,
various
people
did
the
trash
exercise
and
went
through
all
the
hundreds
issues
and
label
them
with
two
things.
A
So
one
of
them
is
milestone,
so
whether
this
is
for
1
0
or
the
nebulous
feature,
and
the
second
thing
is
the
priority
or
the
pipeline,
which
is
p0
p1
p2.
Okay,
so
let
me,
let
me
show
you
quickly
how
this
looks
like
a
bunch
of
them
have
been
known,
have
been
close,
but
not
all
of
them.
So
right
now,
for
instance,
these
are
all
the
issues
across
East
yon.
C
I
A
A
There
are,
for
instance,
two
out
of
ten
issues
completed,
ok
and
whoever
wants
to
follow
the
work
on
this
particular
aspect
can
look
at
this
epic
and
just
see
how
the
issues
are
closed
or
like,
for
instance,
from
the
ones
that
are
closed,
go
to
the
the
actual
fix.
So
if
you,
if
you
are
interested
to
see
the
mesh
config
protocol
server,
for
instance,
so
that's
the
issue,
but
it
was
fixed
in
this
PR.
So
you
can
see
the
changes
easily
I'll
try
to
keep
this
nice
and
tidy
alright
yeah.
A
Ok,
so
any
any
other
question
on
this
now
or
it's
good,
we
switch
back
to
triage,
alright,
so
Louise
here
also,
so
we
actually
started
to
talk
about
the
triage
and
I.
Wasn't
sharing
my
screen?
I
have
to
redo
a
bit
so
yeah,
so,
for
instance,
right
now
we
have
like
700
open
issue
in
each
do,
but
let's
not
worry
about
all
of
them,
but
if
I
I
go
I
filter
by
networking,
for
instance,
I
am
still
left
with
243
right
and
if
I
go
by
milestones,
which
is
like
1
0,
you
see
we
have.
A
This
is
I,
don't
know
what
this
is,
but
I
don't
think
it's
used
the
snapshot
or
we
do
have
them
1
0
milestone
in
the
nebulous
future.
So
let's
take
the
1
zero
milestone,
89
open,
that's
already
much
better
and
out
of
this,
some
of
them
actually
have
a
p0
for
which
of
which
I
cannot
sort.
So
I
cannot
sort
here
based
on
a
p0
right
reason.
A
We
need
to
load
the
other
board.
Ok,
but
let's
see,
let's
see
so
I
can
do
that
in
a
moment.
I
just
basically
want
to
say
that
out
of
this
89
issue,
some
of
them
are
signed,
but
they
are
not
necessarily
assigned
to
somebody
that
can
work
on
them,
so
they're
sometimes
assigned
to
the
lead
or
to
somebody
who
commented
in
it.
So
I
think
this
is.
This
is
a
call,
basically
a
call
for
help
to
the
community
to
see
you
know
if
you
can
help
with
fixing
some
of
these
p0
issues.
A
I'll
show
you
how
the
p0
looks
like
so,
let's
see,
maybe
I
won't
take
these
ones
troubles.
You
think
it's
your
CTL
proxy
configuring
provements,
since
we
just
talked
about
the
proxy
config.
So,
as
you
can
see
in
my
screen,
this
has
pipeline
p0
here,
where
my
mouse
point.
So
this
is
something
we
would
really
like
to
to
have
in
1
0,
because
it
helps
like
for
a
production
or
quality.
A
We
need
to
be
able
to
troubleshoot
I
think
there
is
no
question
right,
so
this
is
currently
assigned
to
Liam
and
I
think
he
mu
said
to
you.
You
do
plan
to
to
get
these
to
a
much
better
state.
So
this
is
great.
Maybe
you
can
remove
the
Community
Help
Wanted
label.
In
that
case
right
sure
yeah
there
are.
There
are
a
bunch
of
other
issues
which,
like
need
owners
and.
K
A
K
A
K
C
K
K
K
K
So
I
think
in
the
long
run
right
we
want
to
have
the
tool
whether
the
tool
does
everything
we
wanted
to
do
at
one
hour
you
can
clear
you
haven't
right.
What
we
want
the
documentation
to
be
is
dump
the
tool
right,
one,
the
tool
get
the
dump
and
if
you
don't
understand
what
the
Dom
says
go
get
help.
That's,
basically
the
state
that
were
in
yeah.
A
K
A
J
I
Louis
I
wasn't
disagreeing
with
you
all
I
was
saying,
like
fundamentally
I
wasn't
trying
to
disagree
with
you
I'm,
not
saying
we
need
this
particular
command
or
any
particular
command.
What
what
I
think
we
need
is
to
make
sure
we're
happy
with
a
set
of
documentation
that
tells
someone
how
to
debug
the
mesh,
that's
all
right
and
whether
it's
this
command
or
some
other
command
or
some
other
implementation,
I'm
not
saying
that
it
has
to
be
a
specific
way.
I
do
believe,
telling
someone
how
to
debug
the
mesh
clean.
K
So
we
can,
we
can
make
that
you
know
writing
that
kind
of
documentation
and
a
fixed
effort
and
say
somebody
should
go
and
spend
three
days
making
the
documentation
better.
It
should
cover
these
things
right
or
we
can
like,
try
and
define
some
qualitative
criteria
on
the
documentation
which
is
really
hard
right.
I
purely
from
a
scoping
perspective
right.
K
K
K
F
A
A
F
L
F
K
I
used
to
go
through
this
exercise
in
triage,
because
we
all
have
to
do
it
right,
like
I,
can
go
through
or
Sriram
can
go
through.
Around
I
can
go
through
every
single
bug
and
assign
priority,
which
you
know
kind
of
it
has
to
happen
anyway
in
terms
of
triage
right
within
the
book
gets
assigned
to
somebody
right
and
they
kind
of
have
to
agree
with
the
rationale
right.
Cuz,
they're
gonna
do
the
work
he's.
M
A
Let's
he
may
be
assigned
to
nobody,
it's
a
actually
look
at
this,
the
first
one
about
registration
with
non-default
cluster
domain.
So
this
is
actually
a
customer
issue.
That's
the
reason
why
it's
a
p0
and
they
have
no
workaround
for
that.
So
I,
remember
I
mined
this
initially
as
a
p1
and
then
they're
saying
that
this
is
really
like
blocking
for
them
and
I
am
Not
sure
I.
A
K
It's
also
a
really
big
thing
to
fix,
so
it's
not
clear
that
the
milestone
for
this
should
be
Wanna.
F
H
K
F
K
A
M
K
H
H
K
C
A
A
A
K
K
A
A
C
A
Right,
ok,
so
this
is
actually
the
result
of
the
security
bug
we
fixed
in
0-8,
where
the
where
one
particular
invoice
can
be
used
as
a
trampoline
to
reach
some
other
service
by
who
finked
the
halls
header
and
the
fix
was
to
use
the
inbound
ports
to
like,
basically
not
to
capture
the
entire
traffic.
In
my
and
to
let
some
traffic
bypass
envoy
and.
H
A
The
requirement
was,
for
every
part,
actually
list
their
container
port,
so
we
can
use
them
in
inbound
ports,
and
the
few
people
have
complained
that
this
is
I
guess
to
matter.
They
don't
know
about,
and
we
have
another
like
another
design
to
fix
that.
The
initial
issue,
which
requires
either
like
removing
the
wild
card
listener
and
this
thing
every
single
service
in
a
listener
or
otherwise
splitting
the
listener
into
inbound
and
outbound.
Okay,
I
guess:
that's
a
p0!
Yes,.
H
A
1
0
and
the
the
Amboy
part
will
be
assigned
to
your
true,
so
there
is
a
corresponding
and
voice
change
if
we're
going,
especially
with
the
listener,
speed
and
we're
going
to
need
some
change
in
pilot,
it's
not
going
to
be
horrible.
In
fact,
it's
going
to
be
very
easy.
It
involves
having
to
port
like
changing
the
IP
tables,
to
direct
traffic,
to
two
different
parties
that
the
one
depending
on
the
direction
of
the
traffic,
and
also
to
probably
generate
the
inbound
and
outbound
listener.
K
That
the
reason
why
this
is
the
p0
is
because
it's
a
major
usability
drag
on
the
product
right
we
make
people
do
more
work
than
we
would
like
them
to
have
to
do,
and
it
also
didn't
meet
kind
of
the
don't.
The
no
surprises
usability
goal
right.
They
installed
it
and
they
want
the
distant
one
for
everything,
and
this
deal
wasn't
on
four
ports
that
weren't
weren't
declared.
But
traffic
was
still
flowing,
so
they
didn't
see
it.
A
A
F
It's
nice
temporarily
assigned
it
to
like
a
bunch
of
people
that
they
can
actually
ping
the
the
posters
and
then
ask
them
for
updates,
and
if
not,
they
would
close
the
issuer's
tail
because
most
of
them
were
like
pointed
at
like
0.7
or
0.4.
Release
and
we'd
ask
them
to
upgrade
to
0.8
to
see
if
they
shoes
to
purses,
but
if
they
don't
respond
within
10
days.
We
just
closed
the.
K
Kicked
off
that
process
and
I
was
talking
to
said
this
morning
about
getting
that
turned
on
that
will
help
right
it
pretty
Leon
customer
issues
right
where
we
need
more
info.
If
they
don't
respond
like
the
milk,
isn't
ping
them
yeah
yeah
it'll,
also
ping
us
on
issues
that
have
been
assigned
that
people
haven't
done
any
triage
on.
K
A
K
One
of
the
goals,
obviously
is
the
triage-
is
to
assign
bugs
you
usually
what
you
have
is
some
kind
of
automated
system
that
you
know
when
bugs
come
in
it
just
kind
of
ran
Robins
the
bugs
among
the
available
people
in
a
particular
area.
They'll,
do
the
initial
round
of
three
hours
they'll
either
pick
a
better
assignee
or
they'll,
remove
themselves
completely
or
they'll.
Keep
the
bug.
Okay,.
J
K
O
H
K
What
we,
what
I'd
like
to
have,
is
when
an
issue
gets
raised
right
if
it
doesn't
have
an
area
assigned
to
it
all
right,
there's
a
triage
process
that
gets
an
area
assigned
to
it.
Each
area
is
assigned
with
a
group
all
right,
so
we
already
have
github
groups
like
network
hackers
right,
so
what
the
the
tool
would
do
is
it
would
just
pick
somebody
out
of
that
group
and
say:
well,
you
guys
are
collectively
responsible
for
the
area.
One
of
you
get
this
issue
to
triage
it
all
right.
H
K
I'm
happy
to
maybe
have
a
more
detailed
conversation
or
thread
offline
Christopher
about
how
this
we'd
like
to
get
this
set
up.
We're
going
to
talk
about
some
of
the
steel
ball,
but
we
can
talk
about
it
for
triage
in
assignment
two
and
we
have
a
tool
in
turn
called
blunderbuss,
which
it
does.
This
just
shoots.
One
of
the
people
in
the
group
with
the
issue.
A
Think
it
would
be
good
for
everybody
to
actually
do
the
exam,
sighs
of
checking
their
own
issues
like
dishes
that
are
signed
and
see
like
what
is
reasonable,
ready
for
1-0.
What
Rama
described
like
think
the
author?
If
there
is
a
request
for
more
info
by
the
way
there
is
a
label
called
the
kind
info
requested,
I
think
need
more
info.
Okay,
so
feel
free
to
attach
this
label
and
also
request
more
info,
and
if
you
think
you
can
work
on
it,
keep
it
assigned.
K
K
A
F
A
A
A
A
Okay,
let's
see
and
I
saw
myself
I
want
to
see
ways
done
and
okay,
the
PC
here.
P
ones
are
here
and
Disney
issues
new
issues.
They
have
not
been
like,
assign
the
priority
yeah,
they
are
not.
They
are
not
triage
with
the
priority
they
are
with
with
area,
so
they
both
belong
to
area.
Networking
right.
K
Is
what
I
used
to
go
through
all
the
new
issues
and
do
a
kind
of
first
line
triage,
because
we
don't
have
any
other
tooling
in
place
right
now,
yeah,
but
it
it
lets.
You
see
how
many
peas
arrows
P
ones
you
have
and
you
can
tie
them
back
to
the
milestone.
So
you
can
kind
of
look
at
what
work
you're
currently
slated
to
do
for
wha
now.
Actually,.
A
P
P
A
K
C
O
K
Losing
bugs
is
always
the
best
type
of
story.
Okay,
so
I
think
one
thing,
that's
generally
useful.
Is
it's
good
to
set
aside
some
time
to
just
go
through
all
your
bugs
and
do
the
triage
and
if
you
close
and
close
them,
if
you
like
dole
the
priority,
milestone
things
so
that
we
have
some
idea
what
the
aggregate
backlog
is?
If
there's
right
now,
we
just
have
like
this
heap
of
peasy
rows
and
people
came
in
when
it's
one
ownership
and
you're
like
I.
Just
don't
know
because
we
won't
repeat
like
these
are
us.
A
K
A
K
A
That's
it
and
if
you
have
P
zeros
and
they
shouldn't
be
p0,
please
change
them
to
lower
priority,
because
at
some
point
people
will
start
chasing
us
for
p0
is
like
the
TPMS
will
ask
us
every
day:
what's
the
status
on
this
p0?
So
if
it
shouldn't
make
a
zero
change
the
priority
and
we're
actually
running
out
of
time
with
the
try
exercise,
so
any
last
minute
think.
F
A
A
A
K
A
K
M
K
There
was
only
one
outstanding
technical
issue:
around
long
learning
connections
insert
rotation
to
Sager.
Bc
was
fine
right
if
you
want
to
treat
the
GRDC
one
as
a
net
back
and
say
well,
there's
only
one
outstanding
issue
in
the
epoch,
and
it's
this
one
or
you're,
not
that
treated
as
an
epoch
and
therefore
you're,
just
better
off
having
a
more
detailed
following
getting
rid
of
the
old
alright.
A
If
it's
one
to
one
but
like
look
in
this
case,
high
availability
for
pilots
right
so
right
now,
what
did
we
have
here
so
like
under
H
a
for
pilot?
We
have
a
bunch
of
things,
a
about
auto
scaling,
I,
don't
think
it's
in
yet
right.
It
covers
like
lightness
and
readiness
checks.
It
has
like
update,
applying
continued
to
function
like
all
these
I,
maybe
not
all
of
them.
M
K
So
sure
does
that
answer
your
question
because
yeah,
yes,
yeah
those
those
bugs
really
are
X
right
there,
like
you
know
they
represent
the
life
cycle
of
getting
a
future
production,
call
it.
If
someone,
if
you
see
some
that
haven't
been
treated
as
epics,
then
you
know
you
can
always
think
me
or
Andrew
and
we'll
try
and
help
you
figure
out
either
turn
it
into
an
epic
or
we
can
retire.
It
easy.
A
Holy
yeah,
I,
pick
evil
features,
I
think
like
a
bigger
feature
that
may
sprout
in
few
directions.
You
know
we're
really
going
out
of
time,
so
I
think
well,
yeah,
we'll
probably
get
more
feedback.
Also
we
can
get
it
offline,
so
please
feel
free
to
email,
the
networking,
easter
networking,
Christy
or
Deb.
If
you
have
suggestions
for
how
to
improve
the
triage
process
or
questions
about
how
to
assign
an
assigned
just,
you
know,
get
a
bit
more
predictability,
I
think
in
our
process
and
if.