►
Description
Jenkins Configuration as Code project meeting continue after the summer break. We discussed the status of System Read Permission (JEP-224) and plans for its GA, reviewed the recent JCasC releases and ongoing development. In addition to that, we discuss introducing a Configuration as Code SIG in Jenkins.
Full agenda and meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hm07Q1egWL6VVAqNgu27bcMnqNZhYJmXKRvknVw4Y84/edit#heading=h.eghzmsmgoij7
A
Hello,
welcome
to
the
jenkins
configurations
code
project
meeting
today
is
august
12th,
so
it's
just
over
the
middle
of
summer
break.
So
we
have
two
contributors
on
the
call
team
and
me,
and
I
doubt
that
we
are
going
to
have
more
participants
today,
so
we
will
run
through
the
standard
agenda
unless
there
are
motor
picks
to.
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
A
B
B
A
Yeah,
I
agree
so
yeah
for
us
yeah.
We
still
have
some
open
items.
I
believe
that
we
can
just
at
least
this
topic
for
october,
1st,
etc.
So
hopefully
some
of
them
will
be
eventually
updated,
but
yeah.
I
personally
agree
with
you
that
all
critical
stuff
is
there.
I
have
a
systematic
permission
enabled
on
my
instance.
I'm
totally
happy
with
that
yeah.
Maybe
monitoring
would
be
cool,
but
yeah
monitoring
is
a
bit
tricky
because
it
has
management
layers.
It
has
read-only
layers
yeah
and
it
basically
provides
all
ui
from
external
components.
A
A
B
A
A
Still,
even
if
I
don't
know
how
to
do
that,
the
request
from
joseph
already
provides
a
great
foundation
because
yeah
we
have
some
support
so
and
I
guess
there
was
no
major
changes.
This
releasing
edition,
though,
we've
got
some
documentation
improvements
thanks
to
everyone
who
contributed
to
it
in
1.43.
A
B
A
A
A
C
There's
one
pr
here
for
me:
the
third
one:
that's
mostly
it's
not
an
improvement.
It's
I
discover
probably
a
bug
somewhere
between
jks
and
snake
email,
and
so
here
it's
just
to
to
reproduce
and
open
the
discussion.
We
discuss
a
bit
with
tim
about
that,
but
yeah.
Basically,
when
you
have
a
double
as
a
class
in
your
configuration,
if
you
don't
use
a
string
to
configure
them,
they
are
initialized
as
new
and
not
even
with
a
correct
value
and.
A
C
C
Somewhere
yeah,
so
string
looks,
works
well
and
and
also
yeah,
and
so
the
the
the
main
issue
is
for
a
ux
point
of
view.
When
you
do
the
export
of
the
configuration
you
will
get
double
as
as
you
expect
as
this
this
form,
but
if
you
configure
with
the
basically,
if
you
configure
your
your
instance
with
what
you
just
exported,
it
won't
work.
You'll
get
you'll,
get
a
new
value,
so.
B
C
C
So
I
I
thought
that
maybe
it's
because
of
the
it's,
maybe
because
of
the
infrastructure,
the
the
the
class
structure
of
the
configuration
itself
or
something
like
that,
because
you
have
in
snake
email.
You
have
a
method
to.
I
think
it's
the
two-step
constructor
something
I
I
normally.
I
put
the
description
on
on
the
on
the
pull
request,
but
when
I
was
using
directly
snack
camera,
I
wasn't
able
to
go
through
that
that
method
and
but
I
am
able
to
produce
on
on.
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
So
in
jinx
file
runner,
I
started
integrating
the
plugin
installation
manager,
so
there
is
a
pull
request
for
that.
One
thing
I
stumbled
is
just
a
problem
of
plugin
installation
manager
inside
jinx
file
runner
because
it
basically
had
no
parameterization
at
all.
So
you
cannot
pass
custom
updates
and
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
So
here
you
can
see
that
basically
right
now
always
commented
out
by
default
and,
to
be
honest,
I'm
actually
thinking
about
alternate
approach.
Just
embedding
cli
right
inside
jinx
file,
runner
so
splitting
it
cli
and
adding
command
plugin
manager.
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
It's
related
to
groovy
hooks,
so
the
thing
is
groovy
hook
so
that
right
now
there
are
only
two
ways
to
pass.
One
is
through
jenkins
home
another
one
through
bundling,
has
a
resource
and
war
file
yeah.
In
the
case
of
j
caskey.
We
have
also
a
way
to
kind
of
configure
the
thing
by
passing
environment
variable
and
this
way
is
not
available
in
a
jenkins
file.
Well
in
and
at
the
same
time
jinx
fell.
A
Runner
cannot
use
either
of
these
squeeze
because
there
is
no
kickstart
jinx
home
at
the
moment,
and
if
you
don't
have
package
the
word
file
using
custom
word
packages,
then
yeah
it
doesn't
work
so
there.
Actually,
I
had
to
opt
out
to
just
configuration
as
code
groovy
because
well
it
works
for
me
but
yeah.
I
wonder
what
is
the
current
status
of
this
plugin
because
yeah
there
is
no
active
development
at
the
same
time
it
just
works,
so
I'm
not
sure
whether
it
needs
any
active.
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
So
you
check
some
data
brand
to
data
format.
No,
we
don't
well.
We
depend
on
the
configuration
as
code
as
plugin
there,
yeah
so
yeah.
Basically,
we
put
it
the
same
dependency
on
jackson,
plugin
in
principle.
It
shouldn't
change
anything
for
users
of
the
framework,
except
the
fact
that
if
they
use
jackson
data
format,
libra
well
jackson
api,
then
they
will
have
to
resolve
conflicts
but
yeah.
I
believe
that
it's
not
a
big
deal.
A
B
B
A
Okay,
so
one
topic
I
wanted
to
discuss
today,
if
you
have
time,
is
about
configuration
as
code
seek
so
just
to
explain
the
context.
I've
finally
got
to
the
working
cloud
native
seek,
and
what
I
would
propose
to
do
is
to
actually
remove
configurations
code
from
here
and
basically
emerged
it
to
the
configuration
as
code
sub
project
and
called
a
special
interest
group,
because
yeah,
like
we
discussed
before
I
do
not
see
so
much
difference
between
subprojects
and
six
at
the
moment.
So
maybe
I
would
rather
merge
it
towards
conflicts.