►
From YouTube: Ignite talks - Inclusive Naming
Description
Jenkins Ignite talk focused on the inclusive naming initiative and the participation of the Jenkins project in the initiative. The initiative is working to make technology more inclusive by removing offensive terminology from common technology use.
A
Demos
all
the
time,
so
if
anyone
want
else
once
just
go
ahead
so
yeah,
the
next
topic
is
about
inclusive
naming
initiatives.
So
it's
not
memphians,
it's
serious.
So
you
know
in
jenkins.
You
invested
a
lot
of
time
in
cleaning
up
technology
and
thanks
a
lot
john
for
doing
the
presentation
today
for
these
details.
A
We
also
have
this
community
checking
style
for
discussion.
It's
new
landing
page
where
we
integrate
all
the
inclusive
naming
cleanup,
so
it
replaced
our
jira
issues
and
epics.
We
aggregated
everything
here
on.
Basically
this
course
because
it's
easy
to
edit
it's
easy
to
collaborate
and
discuss
and
we
will
be
putting
all
the
links
here
and
currently
it's
an
official
project
in
advocacy
and
notwith.
So
I
made
a
patch
which
basically
made
it
explicit.
A
So
we
we
agreed
on
that
more
than
one
year
ago,
but
yeah
just
edited
and
here
are
some
links
and
you
can
see
that
there
is
a
link
referring
to
inclusive
initiative.
So
this
is
what
I
was
about
talking
about.
Several
our
contributors,
including
me,
angelic,
tierra
vasilenko,
current
target
and
cara
de
la
marc.
We
joined
this
inclusive
naming
initiative
channels.
We
contributed
to
some
meetings,
so
what
is
it?
A
This
global
initiative,
which
is
focused
on
helping
organizations
not
only
open
source
but
also
private
source,
to
adopt
inclusion
of
technology?
And
you
can
see
that
there
are
actually
multiple
organizations
participating,
including
the
linux
foundation,
cloud
native
computing
foundation.
That
is
our
founding
members
so
and
steven
augustus
are
one
of
the
founders
of
these
initiatives
they're
from
cncf.
A
Also,
there
are
quite
big
companies
and
they're
also
related
projects,
including,
for
example,
micro
bernat
is
by
linux
foundation,
networking
and
what
I
propose
to
either
me
as
jenkins,
and
maybe
as
the
continuous
liberty
foundation,
also
joined
this
initiative.
So
we
join
as
a
related
project.
So
basically
our
name
here
prefer
maybe
this
advocacy
and
outreach
link
so
that
we
highlight
that
psja
project
that
we
are
committed
to
cleaning
up
terminology,
because
this
is
what
we
announced
and
for
us
there
is
no
reason
to
not
participate
so
yeah.
It
would
be
great
to
participate
here.
A
Also,
we
agreed
that
we
would
be
helping
inclusiveness
marketing
so
alex
earl,
who
posted
on
terminology
updates
on
sdf
recently.
He
would
be
also
interviewing
with
saying
into
the
framing
initiative
and
we
are
helping
by
sharing
our
expertise.
So,
for
example,
here
they
shared
a
tool
for
discovering
misusages
on
screenshots
embedded
in
the
documentation,
so
he
created
the
tool
for
that
fully
degreased
and
some
somewhere
open
source.
A
So
we
can
already-
and
I
think
that
for
us
it
would
be
reasonable
to
not
on
the
journey
related
project,
but
actually
right
here
participating
organizations,
so
it
could
be
jenkins
or
it
could
be
the
continuous
delivery
foundation
or
boss
and
yeah.
For
us,
it
would
be
free
because
we
are
non-profits
open
source
and
we
can
join
for
free
for
a
companies
they're
currently
discussing
what
would
be
the
cost
for
participating.
A
So,
for
example,
I
also
brought
it
up
in
my
company
that
hey
since
we
contribute
a
lot
to
terminology
cleanup
in
jenkins.
Why
don't
we
also
join
as
a
company,
and
you
can
also
offer
it
in
your
companies
if
you
contribute,
but
yeah
for
open
source
projects
is
free,
and
this
is
basically
my
proposal.
Let's
join,
I
still
want
to
put
it
on
the
developer.
A
My
name
is
the
official
voting
at
one
of
the
governance
meetings,
but
I
think
it's
quite
straightforward
for
us
and
it's
definitely
a
win-win
situation
for
all
participants.
So
well,
why
not.
A
And
yeah
they
have
slack
channel
so
yeah.
There
is
inclusive
naming
somewhere
just
a
second
it's
here
and
on
this
channel
you
can
see
that
actually,
there
are
multiple
work
streams,
including
community,
including
marketing
language
setting
standards,
company
outreach,
which
is
rather
most
communicating
with
osprey
et
cetera,
but
yeah
we
participated
there
already.
There
are
regular
meetings
where
we
participated
and
we
could
again
participate
more
highlighted
the
jenkins
project
and
basically
work
together
on
setting,
for
example,
standards,
marketing
and
aligning
with
other
organizations.
B
A
Obviously,
they're
organizing
quite
big
initiative
in
terms
of
cash,
so
there
is
an
ongoing
proposal
to
ask
premium
members,
for
example,
for
fifteen
thousand
dollars
per
year
for
membership
etc,
and
they
plan
to
funnel
the
most
of
this
money
to
marketing
they
are
non-profit
and
what
it
means
that
they
will
be
facilitating.
For
example,
they
plan
a
series
of
blogs
about
how
open
source
projects
and
organizations
create
basically
input
environment
and
how
they
contribute
to
naming
clicking
up.
A
So
it's
definitely
something
where
we
could
contribute
and
since
they
have
their
marketing
team,
they
need
content.
We
can
provide
content
and
they
can
provide
marketing
for
us
by
using
our
content
and
vice
versa.
They
could
create
the
generic
guidelines
etc,
using
their
resources,
they
outswitch
programs,
and
we
could
consume
these
guidelines.
We
could
implement
standards
or
we
could
just,
for
example,
adopt
some
guidelines
as
jeps.
Currently,
angelic
is
working
on
a
job
for
localizations
and
for
engineers
updates,
but
in
the
future
we
could
get
the
standards
out
of
this
working
groups.
A
B
Yeah,
I
think
so
we're
going
to
do
the
work
we
are
so
why
not?
Why
not
announce
it?
Why
not
say
so,
yeah,
I'm
just
going
to
say
we're
already
doing
this.
This
is
in
alignment
with
what
are
we
doing
and.
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
and
thanks
all
so
I
will
bring
up
this
topic
in
the
developer
list.
Maybe
use
this
recording
to
save
time
once
it's
ready
and.