►
From YouTube: 2022 05 03 Inclusive Naming
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We're
going
welcome
it's
the
third
of
may.
This
is
the
inclusive
naming
project
with
the
she-code
africa
contributon,
thanks
for
being
here
so
topics
that
were
on
my
list
was:
how
is
the
search
proceeding
for
inclusive
naming
targets
for
inclusive
naming
repositories
that
need
fixes.
A
And
let's
widen
it
out
enough?
Okay,
good
all
right!
So
I
see
catherine
you've
already
submitted
several
pull
requests
thanks
very
much
so
this
this
is
one
where
kevin
bruno
and
I
can
now
go-
do
some
some
reading
to
be
sure
that
those
are
ready
to
be
reviewed.
Are
you
okay?
If
we
spend
a
little
time
reviewing
them
now?
Catherine.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
And,
and
that
and
doing
the
pull
requests
from
the
fork
is
correct,
but
the
the
the
error
that's
happened
and
we
may
want
to
actually
have
you
to
make
this
change
here.
The
the
error
that's
happened
is
it's
offering
to
merge
into
master
of
your
repository,
so
it's
offering
to
merge
into
your
own
repository
and
what
you
want
to
do.
Is
you
want
the
pull
request
to
target
the
upstream
repository,
not
your
own
repository,
so
it's
tough
to
show
the
picture
of
this.
What
that
means?
A
A
A
Okay,
so
and
this
the
steps
that
I'm
showing
so
far
are
steps
that
you
probably
already
took
the
crucial
one.
Is
it's
now
going
to
offer
to?
Let
me
create
a
pull
request
and
up
here
in
the
top
right
hand,
corner
you
see
this
base
repository,
that's
shown,
it
says,
base
repository,
let's
see
if
I
can
pick
it
right.
There
notice
that
it
says
jenkins,
ci,
scm-api
plug-in
that's
the
place.
A
C
A
A
A
C
Okay,
I
said
that
we
can
look
at
other
plugins.
Why
I'm
trying
to
switch
on
my
pc,
because
my
pc,
the
battery,
is
low.
Now.
A
A
So
there
are
several
here
where
the
pull
request
was
submitted
to
your
repository,
so
those,
but
we
can
still
review
them
and
make
comments
there
to
be
sure
that
you
have
the
right
content.
So
let's
do
that
good
idea,
all
right!
So
yes,
this
one's
perfect,
so
the
one
that
I
see
on
screen
right
now
is
we
are
probably
running
on
a
remote
agent
and
controller
call
back
to
the
controller.
Yes,
that's.
That
is
correct,
so
that
one
needs
to
be
submitted
to
the
upstream,
but
it
is
a
correct
change.
A
C
Mark
I
want
to
ask
something:
if
you
did
something
the
other
one
you
after
reviewing
it,
and
you
said
it
was
correct.
You
submitted
it
again,
so
you
you
submitted
it
to
the
upstream.
A
C
Why
was
that,
like
you
sent
it
back
to
the
jenkins
upstream
so
that
they
could
see.
A
It
right
right,
so
what
you
would
do,
I
think
what
you
would
do
in
your
pull
request
is:
let's,
let's
see
if
I
can,
let's
see
if
I
can
simulate
the
same
thing
just
a
minute,
I'm
not
sure
I
can,
but
let's
try
it.
Let's.
I
think
I'm
going
to
try
the
same
technique.
So
let's
get
a
copy
of
this
one
and
I'm
going
to
now
go
to
my
fork.
A
A
A
D
Sorry,
just
a
silly
question
of
mine:
are
you
cutting
your
comments
up
to
about
80
characters.
A
D
Yeah
because
you've
got
the
eye,
you
know
how
to
cut
when
it's
the
right
time-
okay,
cool.
I
guess
the
display
will
be
better
later
on
if
you
cut
it
at
80
characters
or
just
a
good
habit
to
have
well,
it's
it's
different.
It's
that.
A
That,
when
I'm
editing
a
commit
message,
that's
actually
going
to
get
commit
messages.
There
are
conventions
and
standards
that
the
people
who
use
command
line,
git
prefer
and
their
preference
is.
This
first
line
should
not
exceed
50
characters,
and
these
other
lines
should
not
exceed
80.,
and
it's
just
a
preference,
but
it
makes
it
easier
for
people
to
read
when
they're
looking
at
a
get
log
command
makes
perfectly.
D
Sense,
thank
you.
Do
you
know
if
a
plugin
for
chrome
or
all
the
browsers
would
exist
so
that
you
don't
have
to
count
how
many
characters
you.
A
Should
have
you
know
exactly
that's
a
very
good
question
there.
Probably
is
I've
never
tried
to
find
one,
but
I
think
that's
a
good
idea,
because
this
this
text
reflowing
that
I
did
is
kind
of
boring
right.
It's
much
much
easier
if
if
there
was
a
something
that
would
do
that
for
me,
yes
good
and
I
don't
know
of
one
but
but
I
bet
there
is
considering
how
wide
the
set
of
things
are
in
the
world,
but
do
that
so
good
good
point.
Thank
you
all
right.
A
So
I'm
going
to
save
save
this,
so
I'm
doing
a
commit
to
my
branch
named
inclusive
dash,
naming
I'm
still
just
getting
to
the
point
where
you
were
a
piece
notice,
what
it
defaulted
to.
It
says.
Okay,
and-
and
this
is
what
happened
to
you-
peace,
I
think,
is
it
says:
oh
I'm
gonna
propose
a
pull
request
to
my
master
branch
from
my
inclusive
naming
branch
and
while
that's
not
harmful.
If
this
was
the
place,
I
wanted
to
go.
A
A
A
I
it
may
be
that
github's
hit
github
is
not
going
to
allow
me
to
do
it
and
I'm
going
to
have
to
just
cancel
here.
Do
it
from
the
command
line
or
I'm
going
to
have
to
I'd,
see
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
ui
here
that
would
let
me
switch
to
I.
I
was
hoping
this
little
icon
there
would.
Let
me
switch
to
look
at
other
things,
but
it
doesn't
seem
to
so
peace.
A
A
A
And
it
will
say:
oh
hey,
this
already
exists.
Would
you
like
a
remote?
I
would
there.
I
have
it
now,
if
I
say
get
branch
minus
a
or
yeah.
So
that
tells
me
here
is
my
branch,
inclusive
naming,
so
I'm
going
to
do
a
get
checkout
minus
b,
inclusive
naming
minus
t
origin,
slash,
inclusive
naming.
So
what
that
says
is
create
a
local
branch
named
inclusive
dash,
naming
that
tracks
the
remote
branch
origin,
slash,
inclusive,
naming
okay!
So
now,
if
I
do
this,
I
I
do
I
get.
A
D
A
D
Have
happened
if
you
hadn't
used
the
minus
t
on
the
git
command,
you
know
without
the
tracking.
What,
in
what
state
would
we.
A
A
A
Okay.
So
now
we've
got
if
we
do
the
the
graph.
If
we
do
the
get
log
you'll
see
here's
my
change.
This
is
equivalent.
What
piece
did
right?
It's
okay,
I've
got
and
we
look
at
what
the
changes
were.
It
says
create
a
job
that
builds
the
main
or
primary
branch
now
to
create
the
pull
request.
I
say:
gh
pr
create.
A
A
Would
you
like
to
edit
the
pull
request
template
that
is
provided
with
this
repository
and
I
like
to
use
those
because
the
template
has
been
provided
by
the
plugin
maintainer
for
the
things
they
want
us
to
us
to
answer
before
we
submit
a
pull
request,
so
I
hit
the
enter
here
and
I
then
says
on
the
body:
do
you
want
to
edit
it
or
you
want
to
skip,
and
I
want
to
edit
it
and
here's
what
it
says
now.
This
is
a
fun
difference.
A
That
bruno's
earlier
question
is:
is
a
good
thing
to
highlight
inclusive
naming
in
the
github
pull
request
interface.
It
actually
prefers
long
lines,
and
so
in
that
interface
I
will
typically
delete
all
the
new
lines
so
that
it
has
these
huge
long
lines
because
they
look
better
and
then
I
go
through
the
checklist,
and
you
remember
how
we
did
the
checklist
before
I
put
an
x
to
say
that
I
did
that.
Yes,
I'm
on
a
topic
or
feature
branch
pull
request.
Title
represents
what
I
wanted.
A
Yep
describe
what
you
did
yep
I
described
what
I
did
linked
to
relevant
issues.
There
isn't
a
relevant
issue,
so
it's
okay
that
I
x
that
link
to
relevant
pull
requests.
There
aren't
any
so
it's
okay
ensure
you
have
provided
tests
this
one,
I'm
not
providing
additional
tests
so
to
help
the
maintainer.
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
I
you
showed
me
something
I
did
not
know.
Thank
you
very
much
so
so
I
thought
usually
so
these
plugins
that
have
api
in
their
name
like
this
one,
does
are
typically
used
to
package
something
else
that
is
provided
by
another
group,
so
in
this
case,
apache
http
components,
and
usually
this
is
just
a
bundling
activity
that
something
gets
bundled
and
included
into
jenkins,
but
it's
an
easier
way
to
bundle
it.
But
in
this
case
I
was
wrong.
It
is
that
this
thing
is
really
providing
some
of
its
own
code.
Thank
you
yeah.
This
is.
D
I
have
a
question:
I
I
think
that
catherine
did
something
to
the
master
branch
to
her
own
master
branch
shouldn't.
We
have
another
bridge.
Instead,
it
may.
A
D
What
if
we
hadn't,
approved
the
pull
request
and
just
created
another
branch
from
her
master?
How
would
catherine
would
get
rid
of
what
she
did
to
the
master
branch?
Can
she
revert
what
she
hasn't
or
not.
A
She
she
could
get
rid
of
it
pretty
easily
it
it
usually
revert
is
usually
not
the
preferred
technique.
Actually,
it's
a
good
bruno
makes
a
very
good
point.
Catherine,
in
terms
of
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
don't
commit
to
the
master
branch
is
because
we
want
the
master
branch
in
our
fork
to
always
be
either
equivalent
to
the
upstream
master
or
behind
it.
A
A
You
probably
won't
do
other
changes
in
this
repository.
I
assume
this
is
the
only
change
you
found
needed
to
be
made.
Catherine.
Is
that
correct.
B
Yes,
it's
the
only
change
and
I
made
it
through
the
ui.
I
didn't
need
to
to
create
a
local
branch.
A
A
Yes,
when
you
do
the
commits,
you
mean
yes
right
when
you
do
the
commit.
So
when
you
do
the
the
step
that
we
did
here
on
this
one,
there
was
a
a
box.
That
said,
would
you
like
to
commit
to
the
master
branch,
or
would
you
like
to
create
a
new
branch,
and
I
created
a
new
branch
named
inclusive
dash
naming
yeah?
So
that's
what
you'd
need
to
do
as
well,
but
but
for
this
I
think
it
should
be
okay.
The
maintainer
should
be
able
to
accept
it,
as
is
good.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
I
know
that
makes
sense,
though
I
have
a
question:
the
ssh
slave.
It
also
referred
to
other
sections
of
this
particular
plugin
and,
and
it
referred
to,
how
can
I
put
it?
I
think
it
was
java
code,
if
I
remember
correctly
so
I
was
having
a
bit
of
a
conflict
with
this
good
well
and
it
seemed
like
you
needed
to
change,
but
then
again
you
have
the
code
issue.
A
Right
so,
let's,
let's
look
at
those
and
let's
let's
talk
through
them,
I
think
you've
you've
presented
places
where
a
human
being
has
to
think
about
these.
These
proposed
changes
and
has
to
make
a
choice
right.
So
so,
let's,
let's
keep
looking
so
now.
Did
you
did
you?
You
are
those
included
in
this,
or
is
that
one
that
you
didn't
make
a
change
for
as
a
result.
A
Okay,
all
right!
Well,
so
then,
then,
let's
finish
this
code
review
and
we
will
okay,
so
here
in,
we
usually
use
a
lowercase
letter
lowercase
rather
than
uppercase
inside
us
inside
the
sentence,
because
in
in
this
case
it's
not
in
in
english
grammar,
it's
not
a
proper
noun,
so
we
want
to
use
a
lowercase
there.
This
one
got
it
right.
This
one
lowercase.
A
Okay-
okay,
this
one
this
one,
because
it's
in
the
pom
file,
that's
a
plug-in
identifier
and
therefore
we
need
to
keep
that
one
as
it
is.
It's
also
not
displayed
to
users
generally,
so
that's
an
identifier
now
we
should
have
seen
that
the
build
failed
on
this.
The
ci
build,
should
have
failed
on
this
one.
So
maybe
we
take
a
look
at
that
in
a
little
bit
just
to
confirm.
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
Yeah
just
search
for
slave,
I'm
sure
I'll,
look
at
it.
A
A
A
A
A
B
There's
another
one
that
I
wanted
clarification
on.
If
you
could
go
back
to
the
sheet
the
get
plug-in.
B
Yeah,
so
when
I
was
trying
to
create
a
local
copy,
I
was
having
issues
with
with
with
aligning
with
with
trying
to
fork
it
to
my
own
github,
because,
as
you
can
see,
the
gate
plugin
seems
to
have
been
forked
from
hudson
correct.
A
And
now,
when
you,
when
you
did
the
clone
and
fork
was,
were
you
doing
that
from
the
gh
command
line,
or
were
you
were
you
doing
that
from
the
github
interface
from
the
web?
Okay?
So
let's
do
that
from
gh,
if
that's
okay,
then
okay,
so
so,
and
and
because
this
may
not
match
with
with
your
experience,
because
I've
already
got
a
fork
of
the
get
plugin
that
I
can't
delete,
but
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
it
from
here
for
right
now
anyway.
A
B
A
B
A
Okay,
good
all
right!
Thank
you!
That's
good!
I
like
that,
all
right,
so
so
what
that
means
is
now.
I
have
to
use
the
arrow
the
up
and
down
arrow
keys
to
choose,
which
is
the
base
repository,
and
so
I'm
going
to
choose
jenkins
ci
get
plugin
and
it
says
okay
that
exists.
Would
you
like
to
add
a
remote?
C
A
So
so
now
what
you
need
to
do,
catherine,
is
submit
a
bug
report
to
gh
you
that
gh
is
an
open
source
project
and
they
would
be
I'm
sure,
more
than
happy
to
have
your
bug
report.
What
you
need
to
do
is
describe
the
exact
sequence
of
steps.
We'll
have
this
on
video,
so
you
can.
Even
if
you
want
point
them
to
the
video
recording
of
this
exact
point
in
the
video
recording
and
say
look
you
can
watch
mark
waite
fail
in
this
way.
A
I
mean
the
the
developers
who
see
the
bug
report
may
say:
oh,
it's
already
a
known
bug
or
whatever
yeah,
that's,
that's
fine
or
or
they
may
actually
smile
and
say
well,
why
didn't
you?
Why
didn't
the
jenkins
project
break
that
fork?
And
then
you
smile
back
at
them
and
say
because
it's
hard
work,
we
have
to
beg
your
support
people
to
do
it
for
us.
C
B
A
Okay,
so
get
remote
minus
v,
so
it
has
origin
and
it
has
upstream.
So
that's
good
and
it's
got
the
wrong
upstream.
Oh,
my
six!
Okay,
this
is
where
I
got
started
and
and
well
you
should
get
stuck.
That's
that's!
That's
so
completely
wrong
as
to
be
dismaying
how
wrong
that
is
all
right,
so
get
remote.
So
so
what
what
gh
did
is
apparently
gh
said.
A
Oh,
you
asked
to
clone
a
repository
that
has
a
fork.
Therefore,
I'm
going
to
give
you
the
the
clone
and
I'm
going
to
give
you
the
upstream
automatically,
and
so
what
we
have
to
do
is
we
need
to
fix
this
by
first
we're
going
to
get
remote
rm
upstream,
because
we
don't
want
that
upstream
at
all.
That's
the
wrong
upstream!
So
we
don't
want
it
and
then
the
thing
that
is
our
upstream
is
actually
misnamed
right
now
it's
called
origin,
so
we're
going
to
do
a
git,
remote,
rename
origin
upstream.
A
A
A
The
work
around
is
change
to
the
repository
directory
and
delete
the
upstream
that
gh
mistakenly
created
and
then
they'll
probably
say
hey
that
wasn't
a
mistake
and
we
did
it
intentionally
and
I'm
okay
with
that,
but
but
you're
now
giving
them
a
workaround
and
other
people
who
encounter
the
same
problem,
particularly
fatal.
Remote
upstream,
already
exists
that
you
put
in
your
bug.
Report
we'll
find
with
google
search
fatal.
Remote
upstream,
already
exists
and
be
able
to
see
your
workaround.
B
A
C
Okay
aside,
the
method
that
was
used
just
now
to
fetch
that
upstream
to
clone
that
repository,
is
there
any
other
method.
A
A
So
now
that
I've
done
that,
when
I
cd
to
get
get
plug-in,
if
I
do
a
gh
repo
fork,
it
will
ask
me
the
same
question,
which
is
the
base
repository.
I
say
jenkins
ci.
Would
you
like
to
add
the
remote
yes
and
there
it
worked
so
because
I
did
get
clone
instead
of
doing
gh
repo
clone
it
didn't
git
clone,
doesn't
know
anything
about
github's
concept
of
upstream
and
downstream,
so
it
just
cloned
the
repository.
A
B
Yeah,
just
a
heads
up
before
we
move
on,
there
is
one
plugin.
I
I
mentioned
that
that
it
doesn't
have
a
github
ripple.
A
Oh
interesting,
okay,
so
that
may
indicate
something's
wrong
with
things
because
it
certainly
should
have
a
so
you're
saying.
Oh,
it
does
not.
Oh
wow.
Oh
now,
that's
cool
okay.
So
there
isn't
a
link
here
to
the
github
edit
to
the
github
repository,
and
yet
I
am
quite
confident
that
there
is
a
github
repository
notice,
the
the
how
long
ago
it
was
last
released.
It
was
eight
years
ago,
and
so
now
the
question
is:
oh,
oh,
look
all
right!
This
is
somewhat
exotic
and
sorry
about
something
exotic
like
this.
A
A
A
D
A
Yeah
but
where,
but,
but
if
we
needed
to
do
a
release
because
there
was
a
bug
it
seems
like
there
has
to
be-
and
this
is
certainly
a
currently
shipping
plug-in,
so
I'm
I'm
suspicious.
This
may
not
be
the
thing
we
want
so
so
I
have
to
give
you
extra
points,
catherine,
for
finding
an
interesting
problem
that
is
probably
going
to
need
some
more
research
to
figure
out.
What's
going
on,
so,
let's
see
what
else
we
might,
where
else
we
might
find
it.
A
D
Would
it
mean
that
it's
the
ac
detailer
is
now
part
of
the
js
modules.
A
A
A
A
C
Yes
mark,
please,
I
want
you
to
help
me
for
something
help
us
do
something
like.
Can
you
show
us
how
to
comment
on
different
these
things?
What
can
we
can?
You
show
us
how
to
drop
different
comments
on
different
file.
A
A
C
C
C
A
I
I
suspect
there
may
be
a
way
to
do
that.
I
just
don't.
I
am
not
I'm
not
confident
that
I
can
show
you
how,
because
I
need
to
do
some
more
research.
I've
never
successfully
done
a
multi-file
change
from
the
github
web
page
using
a
single
using
using
everything
from
github,
but
but
now
just
to
just
to
tell
you
that
I
believe
it's
possible.
A
Let
me
show
you
a
pull
request
where
I
think
someone
else
did
it
so
in
jenkins:
dot,
io,
there's
a
pull
request
here
that
was
just
merged
yesterday,
that
is
the
ci
cd
with
postman
and
jenkins
blog
post.
This
blog
post
was
done
by
this
user.
Andy
dash,
get
postman
and
notice
that
this
comment
says
add
files
via
upload.
A
So
I
think
this
is
a
multi-file
pull
request
that
was
created
by
this
user.
Andy
dash,
andy
dash,
postman
or
andy
dash
get
postman
from
the
github
web
ui,
because
I
would
never
put
a
comment
on
on
my
commits
of
files.
That
says
add
files
via
upload.
I
suspect
that
is
a
github
edition,
so
I
think
it
must
be
possible,
but
it
may
have
to
wait
to
show
it
for
another
session,
so
I
can
learn
how
to
do
it.
Would
that
be
okay
piece
if
we
did
it
in
another
session.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
let's
plan
for
another
meeting
tomorrow
at
this
same
time,
I'm
going
to
stop
sharing
my
screen,
so
I
can
check
my
business
calendar
so
just
a
minute.
Let
me
double
check
that
I'm
not
promising
to
attend
the
meeting
that
my
business
schedule
won't.
Allow
me
to
attend
okay.
So
if
we
meet
tomorrow.
A
Oh,
maybe,
and
if
I
did,
that
would
not
be
a
very
good
thing
so
next
week
I've
got
us
at
4
pm,
utc
and
the
following,
so
I
don't
think
I
shifted
them,
but
but
what
I
was
going
to
do
is
I
was
going
to
schedule
a
session
for
tomorrow
at
this
exact
same
time.
Would
that
be
okay
for
you,
catherine,
as
well.
A
And
and
catherine,
you
don't
actually
have
to
attend
if
you're,
if
you
don't
wish
to,
there's
no
no
require.
In
fact,
I
need
to
make
us
start
30
minutes
later
and
we'll
limit
ourselves
to
30
minutes,
because
I've
got
a
colliding
meeting
tomorrow.
But
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
I'll
create
a
I'm
going
to
actually
adjust
this
well
yeah
I'll
get
us
a
meeting
schedule
for
tomorrow
at
the
same
time
same
time,
plus
30
minutes
so
that
we
can
go
through
it.
Would
that
be
all
right.