►
From YouTube: Jitsi Live Stream
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
we
are
like
welcome
everyone
to
this
additional
duty
community
forum.
As
usual,
we'll
do
a
roundtable
with
updates
from
our
team,
and
then
we
move
on
to
open
mic.
A
A
A
I'm
still
working
on
cascading
bridges,
I
know
I've
promised
for
a
while
to
make
a
presentation
about
it,
but
we
we
have
decided
to
hold
on
until
we
actually
have
an
implementation
to
talk
about,
and
this
work
is
progressing,
but
I
don't
want
to
give
any
promises,
but
soon
we
should
be
able
to
present
something
all
right.
So,
let's
move
to
the
next
person
George
you
wanna
go
yeah.
B
C
C
A
C
D
D
E
D
F
F
Finally
bringing
testing
no
overlaps.
One
day,
this
testing
will
hopefully
become
like
the
torture
testing
hand
out
what
they
are
testing
that
we
have
one
day
we'll
get
there,
but
he's
very
positive
about
the
result.
So
her
nothing
is
being
committed
in
master
but
for
the
closed
having
the
first
appear,
they're
still
doing
anything
else,
oh.
G
H
I'm
here
so
mostly
the
work
I've
been
doing
has
been
totally
unrelated.
I
did
a
little
bit
of
improvements
on
the
jibbery
to
make
it
try
to
restart
chrome
when
chrome
freezes
before
just
failing
entirely.
So
now
we
have
three
restarts
of
Chrome.
Before
we
give
up
entirely
a
trippy
thing
cuts
about
it,
I've
been
working
with
Damien
to
improve
some
of
the
other
parts
of.
Did
you
read
your
capo
discussion
and
hopefully
that'll
be
ending
pretty
soon,
I
think
that's
about
it.
For
our
side.
I
Yeah
I've
been
working
on
implementing
Flex
FEC
in
the
bridge
for
the
receive
SAP
and
and
got
things
working
where
I
think
the
all
the
tests
to
look
good
on
Friday.
All
the
can
test
to
have
so
I'm
gonna
start
I
can
do
a
little
code
cleanup
and
then
start
doing
some
tests
with
actual
calls
today,
and
hopefully
that
will
be
pretty
close
to
being
able
to
be
ready
to
go
in.
J
A
A
G
H
J
A
A
K
J
K
I
think
della
was
here
or
maybe
still
is
here.
We
had
a
chat
earlier
today
and
we
noticed
that
you
can
run
off
meat
in
against
the
server
that
requires
authentication
or
against
the
server
that
doesn't
require
authentication
like
this
one
and
if
you
run
it
against
in
server
that
does
require
authentication.
You
get
a
nice
pop
up,
requiring
you
to
fill
up
username
and
password
can.
I
K
H
Can
think
of
one
way,
but
you'd
have
to
set
some
local
storage
values
that
it
would
try
to
use
to
log
you
it.
So
it's
not
like
there's
a
UI
that
you
can
pop
the
des
says:
LogMeIn.
Is
this
user
or
whatever
you'd
have
to
set
a
couple
hidden
local
storage
values?
At
the
moment,
you
you
were
breaking
up
at
the
important
bit,
I
see
so
I'm
saying,
there's
no
UI
for
it,
but
there
are
some
local
storage
values
that
we
will
use
to
try
to
login.
If
they're
set
right.
K
Okay,
you
a
couple
of
those
names
in
the
chat
so
that
I
can
yeah
about
paste
them
to
you
shortly.
Okay,
thanks.
C
C
A
E
So,
basically,
where
I'm
standing
the
quality
is
most
of
the
times
really
bad
and
there's
no
I,
don't
know
if
it's
jitter
or
what
is
it,
but
you
jumped
very
frequently
from
a
very
good
connection
to
a
very
good
connection,
and
this
makes
the
experience
very
bad.
So
we
find
forces
to
I,
don't
know
400
bits
or
something
like
that.
It
would
probably
provide
a
better
experience.
The
end
user,
don't
like
the
plastic
I,
don't
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
possible
yeah.
A
A
It's
really
a
simple
scenario
where
you
are
only
sending
towards
one
person
using
one
transport
path,
so
the
congestion
control
really
has
a
chance
to
adapt
to
that
and
there's
no
complications
such
as
bridge
sending
to
multiple
people,
and
there
will
be
multiple
partners,
I
notice
and
all
that
so
I
really
expect
peer-to-peer
to
work
well
and
for
this
to
not
be
necessary,
but
yeah.
Of
course,
it's
a
it's
a
valid
thing
to
look
into
intensity.
I,
don't
know
if
George
has
some
comments.
You
know.
E
B
E
B
G
B
G
B
G
G
E
E
How
do
I
want
more
question
so
when
the
connection
starts
to
be
choppy,
there
is
this
message
that
shows
up,
and
this
somehow
disturbs
users
as
well.
So
I
think
you
mentioned,
you
were
somehow
a
be
testing
something
similar,
but
have
you
consider
about
a/b
testing
or
having
an
option
to
disable?
The
GG
user
is
having
about
connection
message,
because
I
think
the
users
would
rather
prefer
to
see
something
choppy.
They
don't
think
nothing
at
all.
At
least
that's
are
you
complaints,
because
this
messaging
is
showing
up
all
the
time.
A
A
B
Curious
about
the
network
conditions,
it
looks
like
it
behaves
extremely
poorly,
like
what
what's
the
network
that
your
that's
not
where's,
your
server
located?
Could
it
be?
Maybe
you
need
to
implement
some
prioritization
or
maybe
people,
your
users
are
downloading
stuff
when
they
have
calls-
and
this
is
going
to.
E
Our
servers
are
in
Amazon,
San,
Paulo.
Ok,
then
most
of
our
users
are
in
Brazil.
The
problem
is
I,
don't
control
these?
Isn't
it
because
we're
basically
a
marketplace
for
video
calls
between
a
user
and
a
professional
that
provides
emotional
advice?
Let's
say
so:
we
don't
control
use
this
connection,
that's
why
and
it's
always
beautiful,
so
we
recently
implemented
the
turn
servers
so
we're
not
even
using
the
video
bridge
anymore.
E
Theoretically,
unless
there's
some
issue,
it
falls
back
to
it,
but
the
complaints
are
that
the
screen
is
appearing
a
lot
of
times
and
when
they
compare
it,
let's
say
to
Skype
they
say
are
sometimes
the
connection
gets
choppy,
but
I
thought
at
least
I.
Don't
see
it
stopping.
So
this
is
the
perception
that
they
get
I
understand.
It
gives
you
a
notion
that
there
is
an
issue,
but
I
would
say:
users
rather
have
smoke
connection
or
that
image
rather
than
document
no
image
at
all.
B
E
B
If,
if
in
general,
peer-to-peer
works,
I
would
find
it
hard
to
believe
that
it
doesn't
work
for
specific
call,
so
because
we,
since
you
have
turn
servers
even
if
the
direct
connection
fails,
it
will
go
through
the
turn
server.
So
there
is
no
reason
to
go
as
there
if
you
have
a
sample.
If
you
make
an
experiment
and
you
connecting
peer-to-peer
mode,
then
it
should
work
for
your
users
as
well
so,
but
but
have
you
done
such
an
experiment?
B
E
I
have
I
what
I
haven't
seen
like
it
didn't
happen
with
me,
so
I
was
not
able
to
reproduce
it,
but
sometimes
we
get
screenshots
and
it
was
the
previous
version
of
cheat
sheet.
So
I
didn't
ask
the
users
to
go
there
and
show
me
whether
they
were
using
p2p
or
not.
So
it's
a
guess,
but
I
can
do
more
tests
and
let
you
guys
know
next
time.
A
E
E
I
have
one
more
question.
Sorry
guys
I
have
a
few
questions,
since
my
first
call
it's
why
I
have
a
few
questions
I've
seen
recently
that
there
is
this
option
for
the
deployment
info
on
the
config.
Yes,
is
it
something
specific
for
you
guys
it's
something
that
we
can
use
as
well?
What
is
what
is
it
for
sorry,
but
I
couldn't
find
anything
about
that.
That's.
H
A
good
question:
we
it's
a
fairly
new
feature
and
and
I,
don't
think,
we've
written
a
ton
about
it.
The
basic
idea
is
that
each
client
and
can
request
this
file
from
the
instance
and
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
where
it's
located
and
maybe
some
details
about
the
deployment
that
could
then
be
used
for
analytics.
So
we
use
it
internally
to,
for
instance,
report
back,
which
amazon
region
are
you
actually
working
with
when
you're,
having
a
call
so
that
the
client
statistics
that
we
send
back
for
our
own
tracking
can
can
conclude
that
information.
H
E
H
This
goes
a
little
bit
outside
of
my
experience
with
it,
but
my
understanding
is
basically
I
believe
that
the
Google
Analytics
side
of
it
is
already
implemented
and
available,
and
that,
if
you
add
your
own
analytics
engine,
you
would
wanted
to
throw
into
that.
It's
extensible
such
that
you
could
write
your
own
little
wrapper.
That
would
throw
your
analytics
events
into
whatever
you
like,
and
that
couldn't
then
include
this
metadata
from
deployment
info.
E
G
G
Haven't
seen
it
I
mean
it's
a
race
condition,
so
I
think
it
may
have
to
do
with
how
fast
the
driver
is
to
open
it
or
not,
for
example
in
Chrome,
because
it
remembers
permissions
in
a
slightly
different
way.
If
you
reload,
if
you
say
yes
to
the
camera
and
reload
the
page,
you
continue
just
fine,
but
not
on
Firefox,
for
example,
so
I
could
reproduce
it
with
my.
So
with
several
webcams,
have
you
Microsoft
one
and
logitech
one
and
I
can
it
happens
to
mean
all
of
them?