►
From YouTube: Jupyter/IPython Dev Meeting, January 3, 2017
Description
Meeting of the Jupyter/IPython development team, January 3, 2017.
Meeting Notes: https://jupyter.hackpad.com/January-2017-weekly-meetings-WRCl7cXst24
A
A
Yes,
I
want,
I
wanted
to
mention
a
few
PRS
that
we
have
open
on
the
governance
repository
the
first.
The
oldest
is
a
draft
of
a
trade.
My
min
and
I
worked
on
a
little
bit
last
fall,
and
this
is
a
link
to
in
the
hack
pad
it's
PR
number
22
on
the
governance,
repo
and
there's
at
this
point,
there's
not
a
lot
to
review.
Our
the
current
document
is
largely
based
on
that
of
the
Python
Software,
Foundation
and
I
think
are
feeling
at
this
point.
A
Pi
I've
created
a
PR
that
describes
the
process
that
we
can
use
for
authoring,
Jupiter
related
academic
papers
and
that's
also
a
PR
and
the
governance
repo,
that's
linked
to
their
and
I'll
type.
A
few
more
notes
into
the
hack
pad,
but
one
point
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
what
level
of
involvement
is
will
be
required
of
authors
in
the
writing
of
the
paper.
A
Basically,
what
their
model
was
is
that
to
be
an
author
on
the
paper
you
needed
to
contributed
to
the
original
actual
work,
and
then
you
had
to
actively
bidding
at
the
paper
and
then
the
third
was
that
you
had
to
sign
off
and
approve
the
final
result
and
be
willing
to
stand
behind
it
and
the
the
second
one
that
everyone
was
required
to
edit
and
author.
The
paper
I
think
is
the
one
where
it's
not
quite
clear,
originally
before
participating
in
this
M
PI
paper
I
would
have
said.
A
Well,
that's
maybe
a
bit
much,
but
after
seeing
what
it
did
to
the
participation
level,
it
was
spectacular
and
it
worked
quite
well
for
a
large
number
of
authors.
I
think
the
sin
pi
paper
ended
up
with
almost
30
authors
and
the,
and
they
put
a
deadline
on
it,
and
some
paper
got
written
with
stream
lee
quickly.
A
If
we
wanted
to
have
paper
hunt,
I
don't
think
that
would
work,
and
so,
if
you
have
thoughts
on
that,
please
comment
on
the
PA
AR
and
then
the
last
PR
we
have
open
on
the
governance.
Repo
is
our
code
of
conduct
and
we're
wrapping
that
discussion
up.
That
PR
has
been
open,
for,
I
guess
it's
been
open,
almost
looks
like
it
was
open
november
11th
and
so
we're
finishing
that
up.
We're
really
excited
about
the
work
that
a
lot
of
people
have
put
in
in
terms
of
refining.
A
C
B
Here,
I'm
here,
thanks
sorry
about
that,
alright,
so
I'm,
just
easing
in
second
to
work
with
the
way
for
the
holidays
from
the
east
coast.
So
today
is
my
first
day
back
in
the
office
said
really
online.
So
this
week,
I'll
be
working
on
creating
and
curating
a
project
management,
repo
and
github,
and
that
will
obtain
I'm
going
to
start
experimenting
with
the
github
projects.
B
Functionality.
So
I'll
have
a
high
level
the
project
management
style
schedule
in
there
with
this,
the
months
of
2017
and
some
of
our
main,
like
milestones
that
we'd
like
to
hit.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
complete
experiment.
So
if
you
go
in
there
and
if
it
you
know,
it
looks
a
little
weird,
it's
going
to
be
a
work
in
progress,
probably
for
the
next
month,
but
you're
welcome
to
take
a
peek.
B
When
you
see
it,
let's
see
next
week
we
have
a
data,
carpentry
reproducibility
reproducible,
research,
hackathon
at
bids,
so
bunch
of
folks
are
coming
together
and
we'll
be
developing
a
new
data,
carpentry
curriculum
in
in
the
notebooks
and
I'll
report.
Next
week
and
the
week
after
on
how
that
goes,.
B
E
E
B
E
Yeah
so
yesterday,
and
and
today
put
out
a
release
of
just
a
small
really
so
to
grab
on
Doc.
Respond
are
fixing
a
few
things
that
if
people
have
reported
and
turned
up
with
the
bigger
Jupiter
have
released
a
month
ago,
not
not
too
much
exciting
there
and
the
and
be
diamond.
The
folks
at
similar,
worked
on
and
be
done
via
and
Martin
are
working
no
more
getting
to
work
on
some
of
the
NBL
stuff.
That
Southampton
has
done
for
for
testing,
notebooks
and
figuring
out.
What
needs?
B
C
I'm
happy
to
talk
so
not
too
much
has
happened,
but
there
is
a
conversation
going
on
with
the
author
of
our
the
maintainer
of
n
DS
Fink's
right
now,
which
does
a
notebook
conversion
in
documentation
so
that
you
can
have
direct
notebooks
in
your
documentation.
I
he's
not
a
fan
of
the
Jupiter
prefix
that
we
decided
on
at
the
dev
meeting
it
I
realize
this
is
somewhat
technical,
but
I've
mentioned
people,
but
that
hasn't
actually
gotten
too
much
too
much
in
the
way
of
people
chiming
in
so
I.
C
Don't
know
when
we
should
all
talk
about
that,
but
if
there
wasn't
much
of
a
conversation
originally,
it
was
mostly
just
Jason,
Brian
and
I.
Just
saying,
okay,
the
not
messing
with
username
space
is
better,
so
I
wasn't
sure
if
anyone
else
had
thoughts
about
the
trade-offs
there
and
if
you
want
to
chime
in
I've
linked
to
the
PR
or
not
the
PR,
the
issue
on
in
these
things.
There
are
other
issues.
If
you
want
to
more
generally
talk
about
this
I
can
also
post
the
links
to
them.
A
A
Ok,
sorry,
so
it's
not
a
namespace
in
the
structure
of
the
metadata.
It's
a
pseudo
namespace
in
the
string
of
the
tags
got
it.
Yes,
no
I,
totally
yeah
I,
just
part
of
this
as
refreshing.
My
memory,
but
also
part
of
it,
is
wanting
to
have
a
clean
record
for
for
the
internet
of
sort
of
what
what
we're
thinking
about
here.
Yes,
that's
good,
wouldn't
it
wouldn't
change
the
tags
list
structure.
So
it's
not
an
oak
format.
Change!
A
C
Needs
does
anyone
else
have
opinions
as
well,
because
we
I'm
on
board
with
that
and
I
know.
Jason
was
on
board
with
that,
but
then
no
one
else
expressed
anything
and
then
this
is
the
first
dissension
we
had
from
because
we
also
have
to
have
third
party
people
who
support
our
conventions,
support
this
as
well.
So
that's
why
and
B's
Fink's
is
weighing
it.
C
A
D
B
C
D
C
E
A
E
C
C
G
G
Kadhi
em,
oh
no
Peters
gonna
talk
about
something
else,
entirely:
I
guess
we'll
wait,
there's
gonna
be
up.
I,
think
Peter
will
post
something
the
skirt
emailing
list.
It's
it's
totally
separate,
but
it's
public,
so
I
thought
it
would
be
fine.
Anyways,
Peter's
gonna
miss
something
unique.
A
better!
Oh
wait.
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,.
F
That
is
theater
technologies.
Awesome!
Ok,
now
we're
totally
off
on
a
tangent
was
going
to
say
not
that
I'm
a
giant
fan
a
process,
but
when
we
set
up
the
Jupiter
incubator
process,
there
was
a
section
in
there
about
just
onboarding
other
projects
that
want
to
be
integrated
into
Jupiter
ecosystem.
So
yeah
I
think
we
already
have
a
process
if
there's
interest
I
still
really
like
I
have
to
think
interest.
But
there
is
something
written
down.
Well,.
G
B
F
So
I
think
the
only
thing
worth
mentioning
there
is
dr.
Sachs
images
of
all
been
updated
work
with
43
and
as
a
change
of
default
there
now
secured
by
default,
meaning
the
token
off
is
enabled
from
notebook
for
30
min
min
and
I
then
did
a
very
quick
review
and
merged
it.
But
I
think
it's
the
right
way
to
go.
F
Making
sure
these
would
just
come
up
with
some
kind
of
authentication
figured,
but
it
does
mean
the
expected
to
fall
that
people
been
using
all
along
has
changed,
but
when
we've
documented
all
on
saying,
you
really
want
to
stick
to
a
version
of
one
of
these
soccer
images
make
sure
you're
using
whether
tag
releases
I'm
just
track
latest.
So
just
an
FYI
for
anyone.
That's
listening
or
pairs.
B
C
B
A
Have
one
other
things
so
we're
trying
to
put
out
a
monthly
Jupiter
newsletter
and
ahna
is
heading
that
up
she's,
not
here
today,
or
at
least
I,
don't
think
I
saw
her,
no,
no
just
not
go
and
we're
always
looking
for
good
ideas
for
the
newsletter
and
while
ana
puts
it
together
in
general,
she's
not
responsible
for
the
for
generating
the
ideas
and
the
content
solely
herself.
And
so,
if
you
have
ideas,
they
can
really
come
from
a
wide
range
of
topics
related
to
the
project.