►
From YouTube: JupyterLab Team Meeting - 31 May 2023
Description
A meeting to share and discuss features, ideas, issues, and pull requests in JupyterLab and other Jupyter frontends. This meeting is open to anyone and everyone.
Join future calls via the Jupyter community calendar: https://docs.jupyter.org/en/latest/community/content-community.html#jupyter-community-meetings
Notes for upcoming meetings can be found on the agenda: https://hackmd.io/Y7fBMQPSQ1C08SDGI-fwtg
Past notes can be found on the JupyterLab team compass: https://github.com/jupyterlab/team-compass/issues/170
A
Hey
good
morning,
good
evening,
everyone
I'm
Jason
filling
in
for
Darian.
Today,
it's
May
31st
2023.
This
is
the
Jupiter
lab
weekly
call
got
about
10
people
on
the
call.
At
the
moment
we
have
our
agenda,
which
I
will
once
again
drop
into
the
chat
for
anyone
who
has
joined
recently.
A
First
thing
on
the
agenda
is
for
me,
which
is
the
Jupiter
lab
4
blog
post.
We
announced
we
officially
released
Jupiter
lab
400
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
more
recently
we
released
401.
A
So
we
have
not
yet
done
a
blog
post
on
the
Jupiter
blog
about
this.
So
I
wanted
to
get
people's
feelings
about
like
what
are
the
next
steps
to
publish?
What
do
people
think
about
this.
B
So
in
the
yeah
go
ahead,
whoever
started.
C
Yeah
I
I
wanted
to
say
that
I
have
similar
question
less
to
a
week
during
the
call
and
I
was
told
that
you
know
after
the
text
is.
Everyone
are
happy
after
the
text
is
ready
to
be
published.
It
should
be
submitted
to
the
inbox
it's
through
medium
right.
So
the
question
is:
if
everyone
are
happy
with
the
draft
yep
yeah.
A
Yeah
I
made
some
so
I
was
out
for
about
a
week
recently.
I
came
back
yesterday
saw
that
a
lot
of
feedback
came
in
on
the
Google
Doc
I
made
a
bunch
of
changes.
I
I
think
there
was
a
bit
of
concern
about
collaboration,
100
not
being
available
yet
but
I'm,
okay,
in
the
interest
of
getting
the
announcement
out
of
just
deleting
mention
of
collaboration
100,
and
we
can
have
a
follow-up
blog
post
when
about
collaboration
100..
What
do
folks
think
about
that?.
B
Yeah
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
remaining
items.
Okay,
it
wouldn't
be
nice
to
have
it
released
before
publishing
the
blog
post,
but
realistically
I
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
happen
in
the
coming
week
or
weeks.
So
that
is
probably
we
shouldn't
wait
on
that
then,
because
otherwise
we
might
just
wait
for
a
bit
too
long.
B
Okay,
yeah
and
yeah,
like
we
may
like
we
discussing
on
the
issue.
I
mean
people,
do
keeping
storage
computer
collaboration.
They
will
get
the
the
previous
anyway
because
there
is
no
final
release.
So
it's
not
it's
not
like.
We
have
to
update
the
common
life
afterwards
that
we
can
just
use
trip,
install
collaboration
directly,
and
you
know
there
are
City
issues.
They
will
be
fixed
as
we
go
so
we'll
be
fine.
A
D
B
Is
still
on
the
Trap,
3
and
retro,
there
is
a
work
in
progress
PR
for
to
day
two
lab
four
and
the
book
seven
packages,
but
it's
not
there
yet
I
think
we
just
yeah
just
need
to
go
back
to
it
and
then
maybe
we
could
get
a
privilege
of
data
out
at
some
point.
I
agree:
it
would
be
nice
to
have
it
somewhere
so
that
we
could
maybe
use
that,
for
you
know,
testing
it
as
an
alternative,
two
pointer
for
sure.
A
A
It
didn't
seem
like
a
an
authoritative
Source,
I
I
believe
that
you're,
authoritative,
Jeremy
I,
don't
don't
take
it
personally,
but
also
because
binder
is
having
some
constraints
we
might
not.
We
might
want
to
discourage
people.
We
might
not
want
to
encourage
people
to
experiment
just
out
of
their
own
curiosity,
so
I'm,
okay
with
deleting
that
to
say,
if
you're
interested
in
trying
it
out
go,
try
it
out,
go
download
it
and
run
it
on
your
own
machine
or
folks.
Okay,
with
that.
B
Yeah,
although
I
mean
the
blog
post,
they
you
know
they
stay
around
for
a
long
time.
So
who
knows?
Maybe
in
a
few
months
binary
will
be
better
again,
so
it
could
also
be
nice
to
have
it
in
the
in
the
post
and
yeah.
For
the
past
few
years,
we've
all
we've
been
using
this
trip
to
Liberty
more
and
I
see
that
there
there
was
some
activity
recently
on
that
report
to
update
it
through
to
tab
4.,
so
I
don't
know,
maybe
yeah.
B
Afterwards,
but
usually
we
just
forget
to
do
it,
but
you
know
if
someone
with
edit
writes
on
on
medium
Kudo,
also
at
the
binary
link
later
on.
If
we,
if
we
don't
forget
about
it
for
sure.
A
Personally,
I
was
looking
at
the
this
page,
which
I
just
dropped
into
the
chat:
the
try
Jupiter
page,
which
it
still
uses
Jupiter
light.
So
it's
not
going
to
give
you
Jupiter
lab
4,
but
I
could
link
to
that.
To
say,
as
of
this,
writing
this
still
uses
Jupiter
Lab
3,
but
it
could
be
upgraded.
It
will
be
upgraded
soon
or
we
could
just
go
back
into
medium
and
edit
something
later
when
it's
available
like
I.
A
Don't
think
that
this
is
a
going
to
be
a
controversial
edit
to
put
that
in
when
we're
ready,
but
I
think
the
the
announcement
is
more
important
than
like
having
all
the
information
totally
complete
Andrew.
You
have
your
hand
up.
C
I
agree
that
having
an
announcement
in
some
reasonable
time
after
the
release
is
important
at
the
same
time,
having
a
way
for
people
to
immediately
try
Jupiter
lab
would
be
nice,
especially
if
we're
gonna
promote
the
post.
C
So
the
question
is,
if
so,
for
me
binder
if
it
uses
packages
published
on
PIP
IT
and
is
able
to
build
from
already
made
image
it
loads
in
every
time,
for
example,
Jeremy's
just
loads
for
me
every
time
so
I
guess
the
question
is,
for
example,
we
could
I
think
we
could
update
a
notebook
demo
right.
What
Mike
was
I
was
looking
into
it
yesterday.
I
know,
Mike
was
also
working
on
it,
but
should
we
do
it
now
taking
in
account
the
unreliability
of
binder
alternative
I?
C
A
I
can
file
an
issue
against
the
website
as
well
to
upgrade
the
the
try
page
just
so
that
we
have
that
in
our
queue
as
well.
Okay,
so
next
steps
on
this
I
will
make
a
couple
more
edits,
as
we
discussed
to,
for
example,
delete
the
collaboration,
stuff,
delete
the
messages
to
use
binder
and
then
I
can
talk
with
Brian
or
other
people
about
getting
it
submitted.
Vdar,
you
got
your
hand
up.
E
Yeah
I
don't
know
some
of
the
discussion
on
that
document.
Kind
of
disappeared
for
me,
I
know
I
understood
that
he
had
accidentally
deleted,
something
or
or
not
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
discussion
was
completed
or
not,
but
for
the
I
think
both
the
settings
editor
and
the
cell
toolbar
right.
The
current
text
reads
as
if
these
are
new
features
in
4.0
yeah.
Well,
they
did
it.
E
They
exist
in
the
3x
releases,
but
there
are
improvements
to
them
right
in
the
Forex
or
they're,
more
made
more
extensible
or
whatever
so
I
think
the
the
actual
text
there
should
be
more.
You
should
be
careful
about
saying
that
this
is
new
with
this
current
phrasing,
because
if
it
isn't
like
the
full
feature,
is
new
yeah,
so
I'm
sure
that
there
is
some
Nuance
there.
That
is
important
that
there
is
some
new
features
there.
I
just
think
we
should
just
have.
The
text
should
be
more
okay.
Okay,
that's.
A
E
Also,
I'm
thinking
have
I
think
I
agree
with
all
the
points,
but
have
people
spent
any
time
in
considering
the
order
of
the
points
whether
we
want
like
Headliners
on
top
or
on
the
bottom
I.
A
Don't
so
my
when
I
wrote
the
first
draft
of
that
I
used
the
the
the
release
announcement
like
the
the
change
log
I
forget
who
compiled
that
as
a
kind
of
guidance,
and
this
blog
post
is,
is
an
announcement.
It's
not
meant
to
be
comprehensive,
so
I
I
resolved
a
bunch
of
the
comments
yesterday.
So
if
you're
curious
about
where
your
comments
went,
I
don't
know
how
Google
Docs,
like
sorts
those
resolved
comments,
but
they
they
haven't
been
totally
disregarded
or
deleted.
They've
just
been
like
dissolved
I
hit
the
check
button,
I.
E
See
Andrea
has
the
hand
open
so.
A
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
on
that.
Adding
on
the
you
know,
you
know
what,
in
terms
of
what
is
present
in
what
order
I'm
open
to
suggestions,
I,
also,
don't
think
that
every
single
feature
needs
to
be
there
and
I
also
hear
your
statements
about
the
cell
toolbar
and
the
settings
not
being
totally
new.
E
Though
I'll
leave
that
to
you
I'm
just
saying
that
if
if
they
are
not
new,
but
they
are,
there
is
some
new
exciting
stuff
in
there
I
think
the
text
should
having.
A
Worked
on
the
cell
toolbar
I,
don't
know
if
there's
something
exciting
in
in
the
cell
toolbar
as
implemented
in
4-0,
so
we
could
call
attention
to
it
or
we
could
just
like
say,
hey
check
this
out.
You.
A
C
So
I
wanted
to
say
to
vidars
that
your
comments
were
to
my
suggestions
like
in
edit
mode
and
when
I
was
editing.
My
suggestion
I
didn't
understood
it
would
happen
but
like
when
you
added
something
that
was
commented
in
the
comment
would
get
deleted.
That's
what
happened
but
I
had
like
a
copy
of
the
document.
So
I
mentioned
it
in
the
comment.
So
regarding
that
comment,
there
was
a
keynote
address
during
the
Egyptian
yeah.
C
Those
features
were
mentioned
as
a
new,
so
I
was
under
Impressions
and
say
yes,
they
were
back
ported
to
3.6,
but.
E
My
impression
was
that
there
were
improvements
to
them.
They
were
made
more
extensible,
but
that's
why
they
were
that.
That
was
new
for
4.0
and
that's
why
I
was
mentioned
and
it
also
the
lab
talk
on
jupitercon
was
more
about
like
what
has.
What
is
the
state
of
Jupiter
lab
right.
Well
has
changed
since
the
last
release
and
then,
whether
it's
in
the
4.0
or
the
three
point
X
release
match,
isn't
that
relevant?
Well,
for
this
blog
post,
it
is
specifically
about
drupalab
4.
E
E
D
Maybe
some
headline
by
the
way,
this
improvements
were
not
I'm,
not
completely
new,
but
are
still
new.
If
you
haven't
graded
from
3.0.
A
Yeah,
okay,
these
are
all
really
good
suggestions.
Thank
you.
All
I
will
make
additional
modifications
to
that
blog
post
and
we'll
try
to
push
that
forward.
Today
is
Wednesday
I'd
like
to
at
least
get
this
into
the
submission
queue
by
the
end
of
the
week,
so
that
we
can
hopefully
get
that
in
the
queue
one
other
topic.
Oh
sorry,
Mike.
You
got
a
question.
Yes,.
D
Do
you
have
any
kind
of
illustrations
in
mind
because
if
not
I
can
try
to
provide
some
screenshots,
but
if
you've
already
thought
about
something,
especially
given
the
constraints
of
medium
wood
on.
A
A
That's,
that's
fine
I
think
smaller
is
probably
better
than
bigger
like
if
you
want
to
emphasize
one
part
of
of
the
UI
that
might
fit
a
little
bit
better
I'm,
okay,
to
submit
it
just
as
text
and
let
people
kind
of
try
it
out
for
themselves.
A
D
Okay,
so
yeah
I
will
try
to
file
like
one
Solutions,
which
highlights
all
the
functions.
Okay,
and
if
you
don't
hear
from
me
by
the
end
of
tomorrow,
just
ignore
it
and
submitted
assets.
Okay,.
B
There
are
some
features
that
are
really
I
mean
much
easier
to
understand
when
you
see
them,
for
example,
they're
like
in
the
object
lab
for
talk
the
video
about
the
performance
improvements.
Yes,
that.
B
A
Does
work
with
animations,
although
I
it
also
lets
you
use
animations
as
the
hero
image
as
like
the
primary
image,
which
I
think
is
a
little
distracting,
but
putting
it
in
the
page.
Also
medium
generally
prefers
you
to
have
at
least
one
image
in
there.
So
if
we
could
have
an
image
just
with
like
a
screenshot
of
the
40
interface,
perhaps
showing
one
or
two
features
in
it,
that
would
be
a
good
key
image
to
show
up
in
the
feed.
A
So
yeah
I
will
follow
up
end
of
the
week,
probably
beginning
of
Friday
my
time.
So
that
would
give
our
friends
in
Europe
all
day
to
work
on
that.
So
yeah,
please
feel
free
to
send
me
stuff
or
add
it
to
the
Google
Doc,
but
yeah
I
would
like
to
move
this
forward
as
soon
as
I
can
On
a
related
note
when
that's
out
I'd
like
it
to
I,
can
promote
it
on
discourse.
A
I,
don't
know
who
has
permissions
to
publish
to
the
Twitter
account
I
might,
in
fact,
if
that's
in
the
one
password,
but
we
should
probably
like
post
about
it
on
social
media
as
well
to
really
get
the
word
out,
because
I
haven't
seen
a
whole
lot
on
the
project.
Jupiter
Twitter
account
and
she's
got
his
hand
up.
C
I
wanted
to
talk
about
collaboration,
so
it
was
one
of
the
major
promised
features
of
4.0
and
even
though
1.0.0
is
not
released,
the
collaboration
is
working,
as
is
so
taking
that
into
account
should
be
actually
deleted.
Delete
the
mention
of
the
collaboration
from
blog
post.
A
C
Okay,
yeah
I
mean
I'm,
not
sure
this
is
a
correct
decision,
but
if
there
are
no
zinc,
diverse
whatever
yeah,
that's
that's
fine.
If
everyone
are
okay
with
that,
okay.
A
I
I
know
that
we
wanted
to
make
this
a
big
deal,
but
I
also
respect
the
decision
of
the
team,
and
we
can
have
like
a
follow-up
discussion
about
that.
I
think
that's
this.
The
the
topic
of
RTC
is
substantial
and
complex
enough
to
just
to
Merit
a
blog
post
and
a
discussion
thread
of
its
own.
B
The
one
thing
that
was
also
discussed
during
triple
con
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
possible
to
do
it
like
in
a
short
time
frame.
It
would
be
the
to
also
show
how
all
of
these
new
versions
of
YouTube
notebook,
7
and
also
to
grab
desktop
can
work
together.
B
You
know,
so
it's
like
we're
using
the
same
pretty
much
the
same
framework
and
I'm
just
sure
that
you
could
collaborate
on
the
documents
using
any
of
these,
so
it
would
have
been
great
to
get
those
in
the
blog
post
as
well,
but
maybe
that
won't
be
in
this
one.
Maybe
this
one
should
just
be
a
short
announcement
indeed
for
the
lab
4,
and
then
we
could
make
we
could
write
new
ones
for
sure
Focus,
maybe
more
on
maybe
collaboration,
yeah
or
like
I.
A
Mean
this
is
the
great.
This
is
the
great
thing
about
the
blog
being
our
medium,
it's
like
if
you,
if
you
want
to
send
out
press
releases,
those
cost
thousands
of
dollars
per
press
to
release.
So
you
try
not
to
you
know,
send
out
too
many
press
releases
that
cost
a
lot
of
money,
but
medium
I,
don't
think
we
pay
per
post
and
discourse
I'm,
pretty
sure
we
don't
pay
proposed
in
Twitter.
We
can.
We
can
post
all
we
want
on
these
media.
So
let's
do
that.
Let's
keep
the
conversation
going.
E
Those
two
four
columns,
the
one
concern
I
have
by
not
mentioning
rftc
at
all.
One
thing
is
deleting
the
text
that
is
there
now.
The
other
is
not
mentioning
at
all
is
how
many
users
are
expecting
Jupiter
lab
4
to
be
where
RTC
is
dropping.
They
will
see
this
announcement,
they
will
come
to
the
blog
post
and
they
will
see
no
mention
of
it
at
all.
Will
they
think
that
that
means
it's
vaporware
is
never
happening,
and
if
we
do
a
follow-up
blog
post
will
that
have
the
same
amount
of
visibility
right.
E
E
That's
that
those
would
be
the
counter
points,
I
don't
know
if
they
are,
which
one
should
wait,
the
most
so
I'm
not.
A
A
Want
to
dwell
too
much
on
this,
because
we've
got
other
topics
on
the
agenda.
This
is
something
we've
gone
back
and
forth
a
bit
on
the
draft
like
do
we
mention
that
RTC
is
not
in
Jupiter
lab
for
on
its
own?
A
B
C
There
is
I
agree
that
we
need
to
be
careful
about
collaboration.
We
need
to
at
least
mention
it.
If
we
don't.
A
I'm,
seeing
I'm
seeing
a
few
yeses
a
few
plus
ones
so,
unless
I
hear
a
loud
enough
dissent,
I
can
reinstate
it
as
a
kind
of
lightweight
hey
if
you're,
if
you're,
if
you're
waiting
for
RTC
know
that
it's
not
built
into
Jupiter
lab
for,
but
it
it
is
available
in
Jupiter,
lab
collaboration,
which
is
currently
in
pre-release,
keep
an
eye
on
this
space
for
an
announcement.
You
know
when
that's
available
by
the
way,
whoever
is
working
on
the
release
of
that
who's.
A
A
Okay,
it
is
now
nearly
half
past
the
hour
and
we've
got
a
few
other
people
who
put
their
names
on
the
agenda,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
take
up
all
the
time.
Thank
you
all
for
your
contributions
here
and
I've
got
action.
Items
of
my
own
Jeremy
is
next
up
on
the
agenda.
B
Yeah,
there's
just
a
small
announcement:
there
is
order
one
and
our
variable
is
the
first
batch
release
since
the
photo
all
release
and
there's
been
a
couple
of
bug,
fixes
and
a
bunch
of
other
things.
So
it's
in
the
in
the
trash
shop
there
and
I
opened
a
new
issue
to
start
talking
and
the
tracking
items
for
4.1
specially
when
it
comes
to
the
timeline.
So
for
now
we
have
no
no
timeline,
but
there
are
a
few
uprs
already
and
I've
already
ready
to
go.
B
So
the
question
would
be:
when
do
we
want
to
release
a
4.1,
and
when
can
we
stop
branching?
So
nothing
like
no
hurry,
I
would
say,
but
something
to
keep
in
mind
and
that's
yeah.
That's
all.
D
Yeah
so
I
mentioned
that
last
week,
when
we
were
discussing
the
draft
post
for
that,
it
would
be
very
nice
to
have
locally
hosted
models
available,
and
that
has
been
a
discussion
about
that
opened,
says
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
we
are
talking
about
this.
I
suggested
that
I
can
contribute
towards
that
towards
making
local
models
work.
D
But
there
are
some
considerations,
for
example,
which
of
the
models
should
be
supported
and
how
we
should
support
them
when
there
are
constraints
when
it
comes
to
resources,
so
that
was
higher
by
David
about
platform,
compatibility
and
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
this
to
be
a
broader
discussion
within
Jupiter
lab
team,
not
only
persons
who
happens
to
be
discussing
in
this
issue,
but
just
for
attention
I,
linked
that
in
the
chat
and
just
FYI.
D
If
anyone
is
concerned
about
hosting
these
meetings,
I
also
a
suggestion
on
the
governance
report
that
maybe
there
is
a
way
to
there's
a
great
alternative
hosts
in
Zoom.
That's
very
minor
point
just
FYI
yeah.
A
D
D
A
Okay,
this
is
really
good,
like
topics
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
who
the
next
step
or
who
would
pick
this
one
up,
but
it's
on
the
governance
team,
so
I
hope
that
at
least
the
EC
would
be
aware
of
it.
If
not
I
think
you
could
email
them
say
like
hey
I.
Have
this
idea.
A
And
on
the
topic
of
the
locally
hosted
models,
this
is
something
that
a
bunch
of
people
on
my
team
have
replied.
David
is
out
on
vacation
for
the
the
following
two
weeks
starting
today,
so
you
won't
hear
back
from
him.
Hopefully
soon
I
hope
he
enjoys
this
vacation,
but
this
is
something
that
we've
talked
about
before
we
had
a
cookie
cutter.
We
discussed
it.
A
Things
have
come
kind
of
come
and
get
on,
but
we
need
to
keep
this
going
because,
like
a
lot
of,
people
are
curious
about
using
generative
AI
without
sending
stuff
across
the
wire
having
stuff
locally
hosted,
there's
a
lot
of
like
mini
models
that
can
run
on
a
local
PC
that
can
still
do
really
cool
stuff.
So
let's
keep
that
conversation
going
and.
D
Everyone
join
in
please
or
someone
else
from
the
team
continue
to
review.
Pull
requests
in
the
meantime
like,
for
example,
I
saw
a
request
that
you
created
about
registering
on
the
assets
which
actually
allows
not
only
to
register
Early
Access,
but
models
themselves.
A
So
as
soon
as
I'm
done
with
my
meetings
today,
I
gotta
go
back
to
pull,
request,
136
and
170
and
rewrite
them
to
use
the
new
Parsi
parsing
schema
that
David
added
so
that
it's
a
little
bit
less
messy,
so
yeah
those
are
still,
even
though
those
were
open
some
time
ago,
between
Jupiter
con
vacations
illnesses,
they've
been
kind
of
moving
a
little
bit
more
slowly
than
I
would
have
liked,
but
they
will
be
moving
forward.
I
can
assure
you
thank
you
and,
and
thank
you
to
everyone.
A
Who's
been
curious
about
Jupiter,
AI
I'm.
You
know
I
wish
I
could
have
been
there
in
that
super
crowded
room
while
not
sick
to
to
see
and
to
engage
with
the
community
about
it,
because
it's
been
really
fantastic
to
see
the
response.
Remember
one
and
and
please,
if
you're
curious
about
generative
AI,
try
it
out
it's
a
lot
of
fun.
A
It's
not
that
expensive.
You
also,
of
course,
have
to
be
mindful
of
all
the
Privacy
policies
and
such
but
yeah.
Please
try
it
out.
That's
the
end
of
myself
promotion.
A
Let's
move
on
Mike.
Do
you
have
any
other
topics?
A
Okay,
if
not
Constantine
is
next
up
on
the
agenda.
F
Hey
everyone,
so
drupalab
latex
extension
was
updated.
This
first
update
to
3.2
is
coming
from
jupitercon
Sprint
and
thanks
everyone
who
participated
there.
I
made
a
release
on
GitHub,
but
I
couldn't
publish
the
IPI
package.
There's
documented
way
there
in
that
repo.
It
uses
Jupiter
releaser
with
that
didn't
work.
So
if
someone
has
access
to
it,
it
can
do
it
or
better.
Even
teach
me
how
to
do
it
so
I
can
do
it
in
the
future.
F
I
would
appreciate
that
and
the
4.0
version
is
merged
and
so
I
plan
to
add
some
more
packaging
changes
to
go
from
jupyter
packaging
to
hatch
and
then
probably
release
4.0
and
that
will
need
help
with
release
as
well.
When
that
happens,
that's
it
I
can
show
how
it
works.
I
don't
know,
I
can
demonstrate
that
it
works
in
4.0.
But
yes,.
A
A
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments
about
Constantine's
update.
E
Yeah,
it's
just
a
note
from
looking
through
the
change
log
for
401
that
most
of
the
entries
there
are
very
good.
It
tells
you
immediately
what
happened
right
and
what
what
was
going
on
it's.
Some
of
them
are
very
vague,
and
all
of
these
are
pulled
from
the
pull
request.
Titles
right
because
it's
auto-generated
so
maybe
just
a
reminder
to
also
consider
the
the
pull
request
title
when
reviewing
a
PR,
since
they
are
not
ephemeral,
since
they
get
pulled
into
the
chain
flag.
A
Yeah,
this
is
something
that
I
sometimes
have
to
do
during
triage,
which
is
retitle
something
because
sometimes
a
an
issued
title
is
not
descriptive
or
uses
a
tone
that
is
not
really
consistent
with
what
we're
looking
for.
We
want
to
be,
as
as
we
want
to
be
emotionless
in
this,
we
want
to
say,
like
this
changes.
X
as
opposed
to
X
is
broken.
You
must
fix
it
now.
E
Yeah
and
just
instead
of
saying
like
this
changed
happened
like
what
happened.
Did
it
happen
too
right,
yes,
language,
package
or
or
why
a
little
bit
more
high
level
is
useful,
but.
A
Yeah,
there's
there's
an
art
to
being
both
brief
and
informative
in
in
these
issue
and
PR
titles.
So
please
please
reach
out
for
help.
If
you
see,
if
you
see
anything
that
looks
a
little
bit
unusual,
yeah.
A
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
public
service
announcement
Vidar
any
other
topics
that
people
want
to
discuss
on
the
record,
that
is
on
the
recording.