►
From YouTube: Community Services Committee Meeting 6/19/2018
Description
Community Services Committee Meeting 6/19/2018 9:00 AM
A
B
B
B
C
C
A
I,
don't
not
have
any
sheets
for
public
comment.
Is
there
any
public
comment?
Okay,
don't
see
it
so
go
to
the
minutes.
The
minutes
further
from
the
May
15th
meeting,
have
been
distributed
through
the
internet.
To
you
any
comments.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes?
Elisabeth
miss
Dunbar.
Mr.
Peyton
is
a
second
any
comment.
All
in
favor,
say
aye.
Any
opposed
no
motion
is
carried
next.
We
have
a
report
by
the
County
Clerk.
Mr.
Henrickson.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
his
report.
D
A
D
C
D
D
I
can
do
that
great
idea.
Just
wanted
a
quick
reminder
after
community
services
today
we
are
going
to
be
down
in
the
second
floor
conference.
Room
will
be
doing
demonstrations
of
some
some
voting
equipment.
You're
all
welcome
to
stop
down.
Please
I
will
have
some
election
judges
there
we'll
have
pastries
too.
So
please,
please,
stop
down.
That's
all
I
had
thank
you.
A
A
F
C
G
All
right,
everybody
hear
me
great
good
morning,
no
just
a
few
things
to
go
over
with
you
this
morning
and
and
then
I'll
get
into
so
I
was
gonna.
Do
the
usual
state
of
the
department
monthly
address
and
then
we'll
get
into
the
solar
carb
discussion
that
for
that
just
couple
of
things
that
we
we
completed
during
May
and
now
actually
early
June,
I
did
schedule
and
the
farmland
assessment
review
committee
meeting
that's
gonna
be
on
June
27th,
which
is
a
week
from
tomorrow
at
10:00
a.m.
on
the
second
floor.
G
Use
the
certified
values
by
the
state
for
the
for
the
P
I
values
for
the
farmland.
We're
also
going
to
have
some
some
discussion
on
on
solar
farms.
I
know:
that's
that's
something!
That's
pretty
a
big
deal
to
the
agricultural
community.
So
that's
probably
my
bigger
discussion
point
for
the
for
the
year.
If
anybody
wants
to
join
us
at
the
the
farmland
meeting,
it's
gonna
be
again
Wednesday
June
27th
at
10:00
a.m.
on
the
second
floor
here
in
this
building.
G
So
beyond
that,
we
also
did
finally
receive
the
detailed
sales
list
for
2017
sales
ratio
study
from
the
Department
of
Revenue.
We
reconciled
that
list
with
the
state
and
actually,
even
though,
if
you
have
my
list
in
front
of
you,
I
have
it
as
pending,
but
Friday
I
did
receive
the
final
calculations
of
that
that
study,
so
I
do
have
three
years
stabilized
and
I
did
get
that
out
to
the
townships
Friday
afternoon,
so
they
knew
the
percentage
change
that
was
required
of
each
of
them,
so
that's
actually
been
completed
as
well.
G
The
other
big
thing
that
happens
during
May
and
all
of
May
and
early
June
is
just
the
handling
of
outstanding
tax
bill
issues.
Everything
that
we
are
aware
of
as
far
as
issue
that
the
public
has
brought
forth
with
their
17
bill
payable
in
18
has
been
dealt
with
so
I'm
really
proud
of
that.
A
happy
that
we're
keeping
caught
up
with
those
issues,
because
it's
pretty
easy
to
get
buried
in
the
month
of
May
with
that
kind
of
traffic
coming
under
our
office.
G
So
just
one
other
thing,
that's
still
outstanding
and
it's
typical
this
time
of
year
still
waiting
on
some
the
return
of
Township
assessment
books.
I
do
want
to
report,
though,
that
I
have
reached
out
to
many
of
those
townships
and
we
are
working
on
getting
those
those
numbers
to
us.
That's
the
next
step
until
I
have
those
numbers
I
can't
get
through
the
cycle
to
the
point
where
I
can
equalize
and
we
can
go
ahead
and
publish
like
we
normally
would
in
September.
So
that's
that's.
G
A
G
I
I've
heard
from
some
of
them
as
far
as
what
would
happen
with
with
the
solar
farm
value
and
really
that
hadn't
been
completely
finished
until
and
it
really
hasn't
any
way
yet
because
the
governor
hasn't
signed
it,
but
but
in
the
last
few
weeks
it
passed
both
houses,
and
so
now
we
know
what
that's
gonna
be.
So
it's
a
little
bit.
The
conversation
can
ship
to
be
a
little
bit
more
steady,
so
that
I
can
give
an
an
actual
answer
rather
than
this
is
what
I
think
might
happen.
But
it
could
be
this.
G
C
G
A
G
G
Sure
I'm,
sorry,
the
issues
that
we
typically
deal
with
in
May
I,
probably
didn't
clarify
that.
Well
enough
would
be
if
somebody
forgot
to
come
in
and
get
their
exemption,
something
like
that
where,
where
the
bill
was
printed
without
an
exemption
or
something
like
that,
and
we
can
go
ahead
and
do
a
correction
to
make
that
right.
So
everything
that
people
have
had
brought
to
us
in
terms
of
issues
they
had
with
their
tax
bill
that
could
be
fixed.
We've
kept
up
with
that
we're
in
good
shape.
But
that's
that's
really.
G
Actually,
the
deadline
would
have
been
excuse
me,
this
past
Friday,
during
the
month
of
December
each
year,
I
hold
an
annual
meeting
with
the
Township
Assessors
and
at
that
time,
I
give
them
I'm
required
to
give
them
written
instructions
as
part
of
those
written
instructions.
I
do
give
them
a
deadline
to
turn
in
their
books.
It's
not
really
a
hard
deadline
where,
if
you
don't
turn
it
in
on
that
day,
there's
you
know.
Police
gonna
show
up
at
your
door.
Anything
but
I
did
give
them
till
June.
G
30Th
I
like
that
date,
because
it's
sort
of
like
telling
the
touch
of
assessor's
yeah
turn
your
books
into
the
county.
Enjoy
your
holiday
we'll
go
ahead
and
take
it
from
there
and
and-
and
you
know,
finish
equalization
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
why
I've
been
in
contact
with
them
already
to
see
if
I
can
get
some
of
those
books
in
historically,
usually
they'll
trickle
in
for
about
another
month
from
now
so
by
by
the
middle
of
July.
G
I
would
think
we'd
be
in
pretty
good
shape,
so
I'll
continue
to
reach
out
to
them
and
see
see
what
the
timeline
is
to
get
that
that
accomplished.
We
are
getting
multiple
townships
now
through
import
and
export,
which
is
rather
than
a
written
book
which
is
kind
of
nice.
So
I'm
going
to
be
working
with
a
woman
that
designed
that
to
see
if
I
can
get
her
to
do
the
exports
of
those
townships,
and
we
can
get
that
kind
of
role
and
that's
that's
a
big
part
of
it
to
anyone.
G
Oh,
you
know
one
last
thing
before
I
get
into
solder:
I
was
going,
I
was
going
to
mention
once
I
got
the
three-year
study
in
and
and
finished
by,
the
Department
of
Revenue
last
Friday,
initially
in
February
or
March.
When
I
came
to
this
committee,
I
gave
a
tentative
calculation
of
about
a
two
point:
four
six
percent
increase
of
value
for
the
county.
Totally
now
that
it's
been
certified
by
the
state
I
was
off
by
just
a
little
bit.
It's
not
two
point.
G
G
Okay,
so
in
front
of
you,
you
should
have
a
document
that
has
three
different
tables
on
it.
The
first
table
shows
the
property
tax
as
farmland.
Excuse
me,
as
farmland
for
two
different
sizes
of
farm,
one
would
be
a
very
smaller
parcel,
20
acre
per
so
the
other,
a
40-acre
I'm.
Sorry,
a
400
acre
parcel.
G
You
can
see
there
and
I,
don't
know
how
much
detail
you
want
me
to
get
into
each
each
field,
but
you
can
see
the
assessed
value
of
a
typical
twenty
acre
and
a
typical
400
acre
farm
and
take
it
through
the
calculation
of
putting
it
combining
it
with
a
tax
rate
coming
up
with
a
tax
bill
for
a
20.
Acre
farm
is
right
around
300
dollars
actually
on
the
sheet
301
91
at
a
400
acre
farm.
The
tax
bill
was
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
and
seventy
dollars
and
forty-five
cents.
G
Then,
if
you
go
over
just
a
little
bit
further
I
took
it
a
step
further
and
said:
here's
what
the
county's
rate
is
and
the
counties
the
contribution
to
the
county,
thirty-six
dollars
and
thirty
nine
cents
for
the
twenty
acre
farm
and
one
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventy
dollars
and
seventeen
cents
for
the
four
hundred
acre
per
100
acre
farm.
So
that's
that's
as
as
of
right
now,
prior
to
any
construction
of
a
solar
project.
G
The
assessed
value
then
jumps
to
a
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
three
eighteen
for
the
two
megawatts.
That's
using
the
$218,000
bear
cash
value.
So
if
you
look,
there
you'll
see
I
converted
two
hundred
eighteen
thousand
dollar
value
to
an
assessed
value
of
seventy
two
thousand
six,
fifty
nine
per
megawatt.
That's
why
that
number
is
in
there.
So
when
you
combine
that
with
the
tax
rate
from
above
you'll,
see
a
tax
bill
now
on
a
two
megawatt,
solar
project
would
be
somewhere.
G
So
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
just
the
even
with
what
I
think
is
probably
a
very
very
preferential
value
for
solar
per
megawatt
I
had
two
hundred
eighteen
thousand
two
hundred
eighteen
thousand
dollars
per
megawatt.
It
is
still
a
sizable
increase
in
in
the
taxes
generated
by
these
parcels
when,
when
they
get
a
solar
farm
constructed
on
them,
so
I
did
put
together
the
third
table,
which
is
really
probably
more
for
my
benefit,
because
I'm
kind
of
a
numbers
geek
and
I
like
to
look
at
the
way
that
things
relate.
G
So
you
look
at
the
soul
of
the
the
assessed
value
increased
due
to
the
presence
of
the
solar
farm.
The
two
megawatt
project
increased
the
assessed
value
by
a
hundred
and
forty
two
thousand
one
hundred
and
sixteen
dollars.
The
tax
dollar
increased
total
was
thirteen
thousand
three
hundred
ninety
nine
dollars
and
eighty
three
cents,
the
the
increase
that
comes
to
the
county
would
be
sixteen
hundred
and
fifteen
dollars
and
twenty
nine
cents
and
then
that
far
right
column
is
really
really
firm.
G
G
F
G
H
G
Side
of
the
county,
the
twenty
acre
parcel,
came
from
the
eastern
side
of
the
county.
Both
examples,
though,
came
in
the
unincorporated
portions
of
the
county,
so
neither
example
has
a
corporate
rate,
a
village
rate
anything
like
that,
but
I
did
just
try
to
mix
it
around
and
say
if,
when
I,
when
existed
over
here
and
one
existed
down
here,
what
what
would
it
be
so
I
was
just
trying
to
get
a
representative
rate
either
way.
But,
but
that
is
the
difference
is,
is
that
I
chose
two
different
sections
of
the
county.
H
I
was
just
looking
at
your
property
tax,
as
farmland
is
about
twenty
five
dollars.
An
acre
on
four
hundred
is
what
I
noticed
if
you
take
two
eight
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
seventeen
divided
by
four
hundred
sure,
and
if
you
go
to
the
solar
one,
it
goes
up
to
twelve
hundred
and
some
dollars
an
acre
I.
Just
wonder
if
the
farmers
that
are
doing
this
realize
that
their
taxes
are
going
to
be
twelve
hundred
dollars,
an
acre
because
I
get
these
letters
too
sure
and
they're
offering
about
twelve
hundred
dollars
an
acre
cash
rent.
H
H
G
That
I've
gone
through
all
of
the
information
on
that
on
that
grid.
Let
me
back
up
and
explain
parts
that
are
in
that
solar
legislation
that
got
passed
the
biggest
thing
that
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
interested
in
is
the
value
per
megawatt.
That's
why
we
got
to
that
right
away.
Two
hundred
eighteen
thousand
per
megawatt,
fair
cash
value,
but
another
thing
that
was
passed
in
that
legislation
is
the
idea
that,
at
the
at
the
project,
owners
expense.
G
They
are
to
give
a
survey
to
my
department
for
the
land
that
is
going
to
be
used
for
the
solar
farm
once
I
get
that
survey.
I
will
then
have
my
mapping.
People
do
a
separate
pin
for
the
solar
farm
itself,
not
just
for
the
improvements
it
will
be
for
the
land
and
improvements
total
and
that
way.
Even
though
the
farmer
has
not
sold
the
ground
to
the
project
developer,
the
bill
will
go
to
the
project
developer
themselves
and
they
will
they
should
pay
that
bill.
Now.
G
That
said,
I
think
it's
probably
worth
noting
that,
even
if
you
leased
the
ground
and
the
bill
is
sent
to
the
project
owner
those
that
decide
to
lease
their
ground
to
the
to
the
project
owner,
if
the
bill
isn't
paid,
it's
still
their
responsibility
to
pay
it
so
I
would
think
inside.
That
least,
they
should
be
careful
and
make
sure
there's
language
that
protects
them
and
also
I
would
assume
that
the
existence
of
that
at
least
probably
would
allow
for
some
kind
of
civil
action
to
be
taken.
G
E
You
I
don't
know
if
the
committee
is
interested.
I
did
have
a
call
with
ComEd
yesterday
about
all
of
the
solar
projects
capacity.
It's
something
I
was
gonna
mention
to
pza,
but
if
people
want
to
hear
about
it,
I
won't
pretend
that
that's
a
good
use
of
their
time.
If
they
want
to
ear
they
can,
let
me
know,
but
I
will
just
before
that
I'll
give
an
update.
E
We've
got
46,
I,
believe
community
solar
projects,
which
is
the
first
line
under
the
20
acres
side
of
it,
and
we
have
one
utility
scale
at
400
acres
and
the
400
acre.
One
is
using
no
types
of
subsidy
or
credits
so
that
one's
completely
independent
business
model,
the
20
are
all
the
state
has
a
total
of
450
and
we've
got
obviously
a
nice
percentage
of
those
here.
So
I'm
there
is
information
if
you're
likely
to
pass
them
along.
If
now
we
can
wait
till
pza.
So
you
tell
me
anyone.
C
E
E
Ships
and
other
people
will
will
benefit
on
the
tax
base,
the
road
districts
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
this
was
more
of
call
of
how
they're
gonna
do
citing
these
and
approving
these,
and
there
are
so
many
that
they've
gone
to
a
lottery,
so
it
was
just
information
for
if
the
committee
was
interested,
if
not
I
can
wait
til
tomorrow.
So.
E
E
Basically,
if
you're
approved,
when
you
sent
them
to
check
everything
or
sent
the
state
to
check
because
they
have
to
apply
with
the
state
for
all
of
the
the
state
side
of
things,
though,
basically
one
out
of
every
approved
projects
will
get
the
credits
and
be
approved
from
the
state
side
of
things,
so
one
out
of
seven
also
there's
a
limit
on
access
to
the
infrastructure
to
get
that
power
onto
the
grid.
So
not
everything.
E
So
that
just
wanted,
it
was
enlightening
because
they
just
changed
the
rules
because
they
had
so
many
people
apply
and
there's
a
finite
number
of
megawatts
available
per
the
legislation,
so
that
doesn't
affect
the
utility
scale
and,
as
you
see,
the
utility
scale
is
about
half
of
the
the
tax
possibilities
that
we'll
see
in
the
area
so
that
one
solar
farm
for
the
400
acre,
there's
no
lottery
on
that.
So
it
looks
like
that
one.
E
If
it
makes
it
all
the
way
through
would
be
about
half
of
the
potential
revenue
we
would
see
off
of
it
if
that
makes
sense.
So
it
was
really
interesting
to
hear
it
was
three
higher
up
folks
for
commented
that
we're
explaining
this
to
us
and
I
had
mean
highest
del
for
the
call,
because
some
of
our
some
of
the
developers
were
hearing
that
the
capacities
use
don't
even
apply.
Well,
that's
not
necessarily
accurate.
It's
really
potential
capacity
that
is
being
there's.
E
J
E
J
C
E
J
K
K
G
That's
that's
an
interesting
topic
to
get
into.
Actually
one
of
the
one
of
the
bright
spots
of
having
a
the
legislation
is
to
avoid
the
discussion
on
what
is
real
estate
and
what
is
personal,
having
that
number
set
at
two
hundred
eighteen
thousand:
fair
cash
value,
that's
for
the
land
and
improvements
both
no
matter
how
we
want
to
break
it
out
if
we
want
to
go
50
percent
land,
50
percent
improvements.
Fine!
If
we
want
to
go
more
on
the
improvements
and
less
on
the
land.
Fine,
so
you
know
to
answer
your
question.
G
I
I
believe
it's
widely
accepted
that
the
the
panel's
themselves
are
probably
personal
property,
but
the
idea
is
that
the
the
legislation
sort
of
bypasses
the
argument
of
what
is
real
estate
and
what
is
personal,
because
it's
different
in
every
County
I'll.
Just
give
you
a
quick
example:
Lee
County
when
they
did
the
wind
energy
legislation
and
we
tried
to
pattern
ourselves
after
the
wind
legislation
because
it
worked
so
well.
G
The
the
percentage
of
real
estate
for
power
generation
in
Lee
County
is
about
25%
in
Grundy
County,
it's
about
ninety
five
percent,
so
it
becomes
very
difficult
to
make
a
statewide
standard.
If
you
try
to
make
that
argument,
that's
what
this
statute
is
at
least
partly
trying
to
bypass
and
and
both
we
understood
that
and
the
industry
understood
that
when
we
did
that
so
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
Okay,.
G
That
really
I
think
the
landowner
themselves
probably
should
be
vigilant
about
what's
in
that
lease
to
to
give
themselves
some
protection
so
that
civil
action
could
be
taken
if
necessary,
and
that's
really
that's
a
private
agreement,
though
that,
as
an
assessment
official,
we
don't
get
involved
in
that
it's
a
private
agreement
between
the
company
and
the
landowner,
and
it's
really
not
for
us
to
to
dictate
to
them.
How
that's
gonna
be
no.
K
I
will
not
give
the
dictate
I
was
just
thinking
on
if
the
land
was
out
there
and
they
have
to
tax
issue,
I'm
sure
they're,
not
gonna.
Let
all
that
investment
go.
You
know
to
the
tax
rolls
for
$800.
You
know,
I
think
they
were
in
some
kind
of
way.
It
will
be
protected,
whether
I
mean
cuz.
There
will
have
to
be
some
safeguards
on
their
part
to
make
sure
that
that
doesn't
go.
You
know
ensuring
the
tax
foreclosure
so
sure.
I
I
G
Not
sure
that
they
keep
I'm
nice
I'm,
not
saying
they
couldn't
have
that
argument,
but
there
is
in
the
statute
the
like
kind
rule
of
1979
which
states.
Basically,
this
is
where
the
difference
comes
in
from
County
to
County,
whatever,
whatever
your
County
counted
as
real
estate
prior
to
1979
continued
to
be
real
estate
after
79,
whatever
was
personal
property
prior
to
79,
couldn't
be
real
estate
after
79
and
that's
why
that's?
G
Why
there's
a
wide
varying
difference
between
one
county
to
the
next
and
when
you
try
to
make
a
statewide
standard
on
a
specific
property
like
this
in
a
project
like
this,
it's
really
difficult
to
have
that
discussion
on
what
the
proper
number
should
be
without
a
standardized
formula.
That's
why
we
did
it
that
way
so,
I
don't
know
I
mean
the
legislature
can
do
whatever
they
would
do.
G
I
can't
speak
for
what
they
would
do,
but,
given
the
past
precedence
of
that
and
the
existence
of
that
light
kind
of
rule
of
1979
I'm
not
sure
that
the
legislature
is
all
that
interested
in
making
one
flat
percentage
for
everybody,
because
it
just
there's
no
number
that
fits
in
the
box
very
well
and-
and
that
would
be
at
least
might
my
view
at
the
moment.
But
I'd
reserve
the
right
to
change
that
view.
If,
if
they
go
ahead
and
try
to
tackle
that
that
problem,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
that
coming
myself.
Thank.
C
G
A
C
A
L
Just
to
touch
base
on
a
couple
of
things,
you'll
see
that
the
registration
is
up
quite
a
bit.
I
think
I
had
stated
in
the
last
meeting
or
two
that
we
had
some
outstanding
registration
that
hadn't
come
in.
You
can
see
that
that
has
come
in
so
that
was
really
kind
of
a
banner
month.
As
far
as
registration
collection
and
our
bite
as
I
reported
last
month,
we
did
have
a
positive
bat.
L
That's
reflective
on
this
month's
reports
and
I
know
we'll
County
has
had
a
couple
already,
so
it
is
that
season
for
people
to
be
careful.
We
had
one
on
Friday
that
had
landed
on
a
child's
leg.
It
was
urgent
that
we
on
a
Friday
afternoon
immediately
drive
that
up
to
Chicago
or
Springfield
so
Chicago.
We
went,
which
you
know
it's
just
a
long
afternoon
for
that
officer,
but
luckily
that
bat
was
negative.
L
So
we
we
got
the
answer
we
needed
to
protect
the
child
and,
as
far
as
our
animal
population
still
really
moving
a
lot
of
animals
out
our
owner
reclaimed.
Animals
at
28
I
found
this
interesting
this
month.
You
know
we
usually
don't
get
a
lot
of
cats
returned
to
owner,
but
it's
increasing
more
than
it
was
15
years
ago,
but
this
month
out
of
the
number
28
one
of
the
interesting
animals
that
was
returned
to
owner
was
a
very
large
snake.
That's
not
something
we
do
often.
So,
as
I
looked
at
my
numbers,
I
went.
L
A
L
Know
we're
always
really
happy
to
move
those
on
quickly.
If
we,
you
know,
we've
gotten
some
before
that
we
have
no
owner
to
and
we
usually
call
the
Chicago
herb,
illogical,
Society
there's
a
very
interesting
gentleman
there
and
he
comes
right
down
he's
really
very
interesting
and
always
has
some
nice
tales
for
us,
so
that's
kind
of
fun.
F
L
L
You
know
there's
that
added
amendment
to
the
law
last
year
that
allows
shelters
to
take
in
stray
animals
that
could
be
a
you
know,
a
factor
in
that
I'm
always
hopeful
that
people
are
being
more
responsible
for
their
pets,
and
we
have
you
know
less
roaming
and
running
around
so
and
the
fact
that
you
know
the
village
contracts.
If
the
villages
are
not
approving
us
to
come
in
and
respond
to
those
animals,
then
that's
going
to
affect
that
number
as
well.
K
L
Did
increase
some
of
those
fines?
If
you
may
recall
early
last
year,
those
those
fees
and
fines
went
into
effect
in
January,
so
the
registration
fees
went
up,
the
impoundment
fees
went
up,
our
service
fees
and
our
fines
for
no
registration
did
not
increase.
So
you
know
the
increase
in
that
tells
me
that
the
animals
that
are
coming
through
the
door
are
not
current
on
their
rabies,
so
they're
getting
assessed
a
fine
for
that.
What
we
do
when
to
ensure
that
they're
in
compliance
is
that
is
given
before
they
leave.
L
We've
had
quite
a
few
more
come
through
the
door
on
a
second
offense,
where
we
are
mandating
that
spay
and
neuter
when
they
they
go
home.
I
think
one
week
we
had
four
in
a
week,
so
you
know
we
are
out
there
making
sure
that
these
animals
are
getting
spayed
or
neutered.
On
a
second
offense
per
hour.
Our
code.
K
L
Had
a
couple
responses,
nothing
urgent!
Thank
goodness
I
know,
I
got
a
call
from
a
colleague
in
the
Aurora
area
that
had
a
situation
where
somebody,
just
they
just
weren't,
thanking
and
didn't
do
the
right
thing
and
left
their
their
dog
and
before
anybody
could
even
respond
or
see
it.
The
dog
was
already
deceased
and
the
woman
stated
she
just
didn't.
She'd
have
asked
you
she
just
didn't.
You
know
what
she
thought
that
it's
like
it's
gonna,
be
a
hundred
and
eight
in
the
shade.
L
I
don't
know,
but
we
have
not
had
any
urgent
or
are
super
pressing
issues
with
that.
We've
responded
to
a
couple
calls
and
you
know
easy
corrections
and
and
making
sure
again.
We
cannot
force
someone
to
bring
that
animal
into
an
air-conditioned
area.
Unless
you
know
that,
if
that
animal
is
in
distress
and
down
we,
you
know
we
can
say:
they've
got
to
get
to
a
veterinarian
right
away,
but
as
long
as
that,
animal
has
ample
fresh
water.
Nice
shade
to
get
into
they
do
not
seem
in
distress.
L
Chief
of
st.
Anne
called
me
yesterday
and
talked
to
me
about
getting
a
couple
calls,
and
we
discussed
that
situation.
He
said
the
dogs
did
not
appear
to
be
panting
heavily,
they
had
large
buckets
of
water,
they
had
shade,
they
had
dog
houses
and
I
said
really
that
you
know
you
can't
force
them
beyond
that.
L
A
L
Yes,
I
will
cover
that
as
well.
So
if
there
aren't
any
other
questions
on
my
my
report,
I'll
talk
about
the
property
first,
because
that's
really
brief,
you
know
we
had
approved
that
I
can
work
with
an
architect.
I
have
just
a
very
small
draft
of
a
layout
that
he
has
envisioned
for
the
property,
because
the
property
is
very
narrow,
five
acres
but
narrow
you.
L
Certainly
his
vision
for
the
layout
wasn't
anything
that
I
had
thought
of,
and
that
would
be.
Why
he's
the
architect
nuts,
but
I-
do
have
a
copy
of
it
here.
If
anybody
would
like
to
look
at
it
or
we
want
to
pass
it
around,
you're
certainly
welcome
to
see
that
I
hope
to
be
speaking
with
him
again
soon
to
start
looking
at
a
little
bit
more
of
the
insides,
you
know
of
the
actual
structures
and
I'm
I'm
gonna
cross.
My
fingers
that
maybe
I
can
have
something
a
little
bit
further.
L
L
You
know
we
have
the
three
buildings
there.
We
have
the
the
Southside
barn,
that's
going
to
be
used
for
large
animals.
We
have
the
Northside
barn
that
will
be
used
for
a
garage,
large
equipment
storage.
We
have
the
three-car
garage
that
doesn't
have
a
specific
purpose
yet,
but
I
have
a
lot
of
thoughts
and
visions
for
it,
things
that
it
can
be
used
for
and
then
what
he
did
was
put
a
lay
of
going
in
and
where
parking
would
be
and
looking
at
this
multi-phase
process.
L
K
Guess
the
only
question
I
have
is:
if
you're
taking
it,
you
take
those
in
two
phases:
there's
an
aggregate
cost
and
then
there's
your
what
you
got
in
savings
or
whatever
to
try
to
look
at
what
vision.
You
can
start
like
right
now
and
we're
looking
at
that
every
cost.
What
do
you
as
to
the
completion,
because
you
got
about
five
acres
there?
We.
L
Roughly,
just
from
a
you
know,
an
aerial
view,
just
just
in
boxes,
it's
he
has
not
gotten
bit
real
in
depth
with
a
rendering
I
think.
That's
our
goal
is
to
be
able
to
get
a
color,
rendering
I
think
in
past
committees.
I'm,
not
sure
that
if
you
were
here
on
that
one,
we
talked
about
maybe
talking
to
the
Career
Center
and
seeing
if
their
students
could
maybe
help
in
getting
us
a
tabletop
model,
or
you
know
future
uses
and
interest
in
the
community.
L
K
L
A
picture
yeah
it
is,
and
I
appreciate,
working
with
mr.
Jarvis
legislative
updates.
There
were
several
bills
out
there.
The
Senate
bill
2270
refers
to
the
mandatory
rabies
for
cats
in
Illinois's,
be
it
has
passed
both
houses.
It
has
not
yet
been
sent
to
the
governor
that
passed.
Both
houses
on
May,
30th
I
anticipate
that
that
it
will
be
sent
on
up
the
54
77
animal
shelter
transfer
report.
It
looks
like
it's
kind
of
probably
gone
by
the
wayside
for
this
session.
There
was
no
action
as
of
May,
31st
and
I.
L
Think
that
was
a
deadline.
Date
I
think
some
there,
an
amendment
was
troubled
from
another
bill
and
they
tried
to
tack
it
onto
there
and
I
think
it
gummed
up
the
the
waters
of
that.
So
then
it
did
not
move
any
further
from
as
I
understand
it.
The
Senate
bill,
23
13
county
animal
safety
funds
that
puts
all
of
the
money
collected
by
the
counties
back
in
the
county
where
they
belong.
That
has
passed
both
houses
on
May
18th
and
on
June
15th.
L
L
It
really
puts
that
definition
and
some
language
in
there
of
holding
the
owner
accountable
for
their
reckless
actions
and
not
always
punishing
a
dog
for
doing
what
a
dog
will
do
if
they
can
get
out.
You
know
if
they're
allowed
to
run
they're,
probably
going
to
and
putting
that
responsibility
really
with
the
owner
that
has
passed
both
houses
but
has
not
yet
been
sent
to
the
governor
and
House
bill.
49
19
that
49
91
I
believe
I
apologize.
L
L
And
there's
already
language
that
addresses
it
again.
I
think
it
was
discussed
that
you
know
if
an
individual
truly
was
you
were
at
that
midnight
hour
and
that
dog
was
gasping
aura,
you
know
a
child,
you
would
do
what
you
have
to
do
and
it
would
probably
be
unlikely.
You
know
that
a
civil
jury
would
really
punish
you
harshly
for
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
without
actually
going
in
and
making
more
language.
That
would
just
may
encourage
people
to
be
overzealous
and
do
it.
L
L
We
decided
to
take
a
little
different
approach
and
be
very,
very
diligent
on
information
and
education
out
there
we
had
a
team
of
us
went
out
there
at
5:00
in
the
morning,
and
we
approached
every
person
that
had
a
dog
or
a
cat,
whether
they
were
walking
in
with
their
own
pet,
whether
they
had
them
there
for
sale
if
they
had
him
there
for
sale
and
they
had
him
on
the
ground.
Thank
goodness,
it
was
a
really
beautiful
cool
day.
They
were
told
to
up
off
the
ground
into
their
vehicles.
L
They
could
not
talk
to
people
about
selling
them
that
that
was
not
allowed
anybody
that
was
there
with
their
own
dog.
We
told
them
that
we
had
copy
of
our
ordinances
with
us
and
and
said
this
is
no
longer
allowed.
This
is
your
last
warning.
The
Pigeon
Club
Act
did
have
some
handwritten
signs
up.
That
said,
no
dogs
or
cats
allowed,
but
as
they
approached
they
still
let
them
in,
and
we
did
have
someone
show
up
in
my
opinion,
I
think
that
these
folks
came
down
hoping
to
get
some
attention.
L
I
think
they
have
a
bird
refuge
or
something
in
West,
Union
County.
If
I'm
saying
that
right
and
it's
somewhere
very
far
down
south
I'm,
not
even
really
sure
hadn't
heard
of
the
area
and
I
think
they
they
raised
these
foxes
that
had
been
there
in
May,
not
the
same
people,
but
they
also
raise
and
sell
these
foxes.
And
this
time
they
showed
up
with
a
monkey
open
on
their
shoulder.
Monkeys
are
not
legal
in
the
state
of
Illinois
in
2011
law
was
passed
that
put
them
on
the
danger
dangerous
animals
list.
L
If
you
had
a
monkey
prior
to
Earl
of
2011,
you
had
to
register
it
with
York
County.
In
order
to
keep
it,
we
do
have
a
couple
registered
in
our
county
beyond
that,
you
are
not
allowed
to
purchase
them
own
them.
Unless
you
have
a
severe
mobility
impairment,
and
in
that
case
you
can
have
one
capuchin
monkey
that
must
be
trained
through
an
accredited
service
organization.
L
L
We
asked
them
to
leave.
The
organization
asked
them
to
leave.
They
got
very,
very
angry,
very
verbal,
and
the
sheriff
was
called
the
sheriff
expressed
concerns
about
getting
into
that
fairgrounds.
If
an
emergency
happened,
if
they
had
to
get
an
ambulance
in
there
because
of
the
line
of
people
that
go
from
the
fairgrounds
2:57
and
trying
to
get
in,
there
was
really
hard
for
them.
L
E
E
Just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
only
regulate.
You
said
you
could
have
removed
the
monkey.
Yes,
where
is
the
line
between
what
the
Department
of
Ag
has
the
authority
to
do,
because
I
people
complaining
about
birds-
and
you
know-
Facebook-
blew
up
about
other
stuff
that
was
out
there.
So
I
couldn't
talk
intelligently
about
this.
When
people
ask,
where
does
your
line
stop
and
the
Department
of
Ag
takes
over
you.
L
You
know
I
think
if
you're
looking
at
a
a
real
humane
care,
neglect
abuse
situation,
we
have
some
authority
to
step
in
and
say
hey.
This
is
not
allowed.
We
had
somebody
that
bought
some
chickens
and
they
wanted
to
put
him
in
plastic
bags
and
hold
them
in
their
car
until
they
left.
We
said
no,
no!
You
you
need
to
take
these
home.
L
These
animals
were
just
going
to
die
in
there,
I'm,
not
sure
where
the
thought
process
that
that's
okay
to
do,
but
we
we
did
say
no
I,
have
talked
with
the
Department
of
Ag.
I,
have
invited
them
down
multiple
times
and
please
we'll
be
here
to
help
you
come
come
and
make
a
presence
there.
I've
talked
to
DNR
on
on
that
same
level.
L
I
was
told
that
in
the
may
event,
when
there
were
foxes
there,
there
was
also
a
hidden
alligator
in
a
trunk,
and
you
got
the
hush-hush
come
back
here
and
I
think
I
think
the
event
club
members
are,
they
know
I
think
they
do
know
so.
I
think
that
the
presence
of
having
the
Department
of
Ag
and
DNR
I
think
would
go
a
long
way
to
help
clarify
that.
As
far
as
you
know,
I've
seen
a
goat
that
was,
he
was
kind
of
hogtied
and
the
guy
was
carrying
him
I.
L
Don't
think
that's
right,
but
I
don't
know
that
that's
necessarily
illegal
and
I
could
say
you
must
stop
and
untie
that
goat
and
carry
him
cradle
him
in
a
manner
in
which
most
of
us
would
like
to
see
them
handled.
I
do
understand
that
a
lot
of
these
animals
purchased
there
are
being
taken
home
for
a
food
source
for
their
families.
I
get
that
I
can
live
with
that.
L
It's
the
treatment
and
kindness
to
the
animals
up
to
that
point,
and
and
when
that
animal
then
becomes
at
that
food
source,
I
think
there's
the
the
big
difference
in
treating
and
kindly
and
humanely
you
know.
I
can
certainly
ask
for
a
legal
opinion
from
the
Department
of
Ag
on
exactly
where
that
line
is
and
and
how
far
can
we
go
on
these
farm
animals?
If
you'd
like
me
to.
L
Active
involvement,
yeah
and-
and
maybe,
if
I,
if
I,
put
in
a
a
request
for
a
because
they
have
their
own
legal
team
down
there
with
the
Department
of
Ag.
If
I
ask
for
a
legal
opinion
of
you
know,
if
you
guys
can't
come
and
make
a
presence,
then
we
need
to
know
exactly
where
that
line
in
the
sand
is
in
our
community,
so
that
we
can
provide
the
best
advice
and
resources
out
there
for
the
welfare
of
the
animals.
I'd.
C
H
Our
goal
actually
to
make
that
done
right
or
shut
it
down.
I've
been
there.
It
is
a
zoo.
Okay,
literally
it's
a
zoo
and
I've
actually
bought
some
goats
there.
One
time
put
them
in
the
back
of
my
car
and
brought
them
all
they
squealed
all
the
way.
Oh,
but
at
any
rate
you
know
and
I,
don't
think
that
air-ground
I've
had
several
calls
from
board
members
and
and
Tammy
out
there
they're
not
sold
on
having
that
there
at
all.
They
must
pay
your
rent.
The
club
must
pay
rent
to
use
it.
I'm.
L
Sure
they
do
I
I,
don't
know
what
that
cost
is.
I
can
tell
you
that
I
guess
I
would
I'd
really
be
interested
in
knowing
just
how
many
people
come
through
those
gates.
They
charge
$3
a
head
to
the
citizen,
that's
just
coming
in
to
shop.
They
charge
more
for
vendors,
they
charge
even
more.
If
you,
if
you
come
in
with
just
animals,
if
you
come
in
with
the
truck
you
more.
L
L
Know
I
think
when
the
the
gentlemen
came
initially
when
we
first
talked
at
the
committee
here
about
an
ordinance,
that's
what
they
said:
you're
trying
to
shut
us
down
and
at
that
at
that
day,
I
said
no
I'm
trying
to
address
the
situation
with
domestic
animals
and
hope
that
you
will
improve
the
presentation
and
care
and
treatment
of
any
other
animals
that
are
there.
I
think
that
you
know
this
has
been
around
for
decades
and
you
know.
L
H
L
Because
in
our
County,
then
we
have
an
ordinance
to
cover
that
if
they
leave
our
County,
then
that's
not
something
that
we
can
cover
and
they
do
hold
these.
These
Grundy
may
or
Kendall
I'm,
not
sure
which
other
counties
have
them,
but
there
they
are
out
there,
but
we
can
only
handle
or
manage
what's
in
our
own
County.
J
Thank
you.
Madam
chairman,
compliment
you
on
your
efforts
to
educate,
rather
than
to
slap
citations
onto
people,
I
think
in
the
overall
scheme
of
things
that
will
improve.
You
know
that
not
only
are
you
going
to
improve
our
area,
but
they're
gonna
get
in
the
habit
of
doing
things
better,
just
because
you're
requiring
it
here
so
I
want
to
compliment
you
on
that.
That
being
said,
can
you
comment
on
the
incident
with
the
puppy
that
was
picked
up
by
animal
control
and
two
police
officers?
J
L
Was
a
situation
that
happened
that
a
individual
picked
up
a
puppy?
They
called
our
office
and
said
that
they
were
concerned
about
the
puppies
health.
They
were
concerned
about
handing
it
back
to
an
owner.
If
an
owner
came
forward,
they
stated
if
we
wanted
them
to
bring
the
puppy
to
us.
They
would
we
said
yes
that
would
be
best
that
way
we
can
document
and
notate
initial
health
of
the
puppy.
We
can
hold
an
owner
accountable
if
an
owner
comes
forward
and
after
a
small
period
of
time
the
individual
called
back
stated.
L
They
had
talked
to
other
people
and
that
there
was
they
felt
there
was
nothing
mandating
them
that
they
didn't
have
to
bring
the
puppy
to
us
and
they
were
not
going
to
do
it.
They
asked
for
specific
language,
and
my
shelter
manager
stated
that
you
know
she
needed
to
look
that
up.
If
they
would
come
on
in,
she
would
be
happy
to
provide
that
they
were
very
adamant,
their
demeanor
and
disposition.
L
According
to
my
shelter
manager,
who
I
work
with
daily
I
trusted
her
her
judgment,
did
a
180
from
I'll,
bring
it
in
to
you
to
no
way?
No,
how
and
oftentimes
if
we
feel
that
a
situation
is
getting
difficult
or
you
know,
we
have
no
idea
when
we
go
to
someone's
house
just
how
angry
what
kind
of
resistance
or
violence
we
may
be
met
with,
we
often
have
to
call
police
out.
Sometimes
we
know
ahead
of
time
and
go.
We
need
police
mostly.
L
We
just
want
their
presence
there
for
safety
for
our
officers,
first
and
foremost
just
to
keep
the
peace
and
really
that's
all.
They
went
for
on
that
day
as
well,
because
the
the
conversation
and
the
demeanor
did
a
180.
When
my
officer
went
out
there
to
get
the
animal
we
felt
at
best.
Just
to
have-
and
you
know
officer
on
scene,
for
keeping
the
peace
and
providing
assurance
to
my
officers
is
icing
them
out.
L
You
know
they've
been
out
on
properties
where,
shortly
after
you
know,
within
a
week
or
two
all
the
sudden
there's
been
a
triple
homicide
at
that
residence.
We,
you
know,
respond
to
places
where
all
of
a
sudden
we
find
out,
usually
after
the
fact
that
there's
some
you
know,
it's
really
scary
situations
that
my
officers
walk
into
my
officers
do
not
carry
firearms.
L
J
I
guess
I
felt
like
she
called
you.
You
know
to
say
that
she
had
the
puppy
and
she
was
taking
care
of
it.
So
did
you
feel
that
the
puppy
was
in
danger
at
some
point
that
it
had
to
be
picked
up,
I
mean,
and
if
you
were
gonna
bring
out
officers,
maybe
you
could
have
specified
that
that's
our
policy,
you
know,
we
don't
know
the
situation,
we're
bringing
our
officers
with
us.
I,
don't
know
if
she
just
felt
pretty.
J
She
made
statements,
I'd
come
and
on
Facebook
and,
like
I
said,
other
people
were
kind
of
well.
You
know
if
I
find
a
puppy,
then
I
don't
call
animal
control,
because
they'll
send
out
cops
to
come
and
pick
them
up.
You
know
and
she
was
just
trying
to
do
the
best
thing
for
the
puppy
and
she
felt
like
she
wasn't
treated
very
fairly
and
I.
J
Don't
think
that
the
puppy
was
in
danger,
but
I
understand
that
your
your
animal
control
officer
but
I
think
it
escalated
and
I
thought
we
were
making
some
good
progress
on
things,
but
so,
but
you
did
explain
why.
But
can
you
understand
why
a
person
you
know
if
you
came
to
my
my
door
with
two
officers
I
feel
very
intimidated,
so,
yes,
I
think.
L
We
discussed
this
in
the
Advisory
Committee
she
was
there.
I
told
her
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
sit
down
told
her
more
than
once
my
doors
open,
I'd,
be
happy
to
sit
down
and
discuss
this,
and
you
know
try
to
make
sure
that
that
the
communication
and
things
that
we
can
do
going
forward,
I
think
if
we
both
went
back
to
that
day,
we
both
on
both
sides
could
have
maybe
made
a
couple
different
decisions
that
would
have
resulted
in
a
more
positive
outcome.
L
Certainly
there
have
been
times
when
people
take
animals
in
and
they
just
simply
disappear.
You
know
it
I
see
it
on
social
media.
All
the
time
I
found
a
dog,
oh
I'll,
take
it
give
it
to
me
I'll,
take
it
I'll,
take
it
and
there's
there's.
You
know
some
real
concerns
there.
It
was
what
last
year
in
Chicago
on
social
media,
that
dogs
were
found,
and
somebody
said
oh
they're
mine,
and
they
handed
them
to
this
person
and
they
went
and
throw
them
off
of
a
fifth-floor
garage.
J
But
I
don't
think
you
should
assume
that
there's
that
many
bad
people
out
there
I
know
you
see
probably
the
worst
of
the
worst
but
I
think
most
people
have
good
intentions.
What
were
the
circumstances
that
the
puppy
got
transferred
right
away
to
Decatur
and
did
your
office
take
it
down
there
Department?
Don't.
L
The
probably
didn't
get
transferred
right
away,
it
stayed
for
a
legal
hold
and
actually
you
know
we
had
to
make
sure
that
it
was
cleared
medically
cleared
from
a
legal
hold.
We
transferred
the
puppy
to
one
of
our
shelter
partners
that
come
regularly
to
us.
They
were
coming
down
to
take
a
few
other
animals,
so
we
allowed
that
one
to
go
as
well.
We
transfer
probably
majority
of
our
animals
out
as
opposed
to
spending
time
and
resources
on
adoptions
and
adoption
fairs,
and
this
was
normal,
regular,
routine
activity
to
us
these.
L
L
We
could
not
get
anybody
to.
You
know,
take
that
dog
on
and
they
stepped
up
and
and
came
and
got
that
dog
as
well,
so
they've,
really
they
take
the
good
they
take
the
bad,
they
take
the
the
old
and
they
were
coming
anyway,
so
that
dog
was
transported
or
transferred
to
them
via
via
their
services.
Okay,.
L
L
L
I
mean
I,
guess,
wouldn't
you
know
when
the
shelters
say:
I'm,
sorry,
we're
full
and
they're
turning
away
owner
surrenders
and
we've
got
other
partners
up
north
that
are
just
you
know,
opening
their
doors
readily
to
us
driving
down
to
pick
them
up.
I
can't
see
any
reason
for
saying
no
and
letting
them
go.
It's
really
what's
in
the
best
interests
of
the
animal
and
if
it
can
get
adopted,
much
quicker
and
into
a
home
through
a
shelter.
That's
that's
out
of
our
area.
L
Them
or
they've
been
a
you
not
generally
I
mean
they're
taking
on
a
lot
of
you
know,
medical
expense,
especially
you
know,
for
taking
the
heartworm
treatment
dog.
They
have
to
then
do
the
treatment
on
that
dog.
But
no
generally,
we
don't
with
any
of
the
shelters
that
we
transfer
animals
to.
They
generally
don't
pay
us
for
them,
or
anything
like
that.
You.
A
L
L
I
think
they
should,
and
you
know,
they're
the
law
does
state
that
they
can
take
it
to
a
shelter
and
there's
specific
guidelines
for
that.
I
know
that
I
am
talking
with
the
state's
attorney
to
maybe
help
see
what
kind
of
language
that
we
can
maybe
put
in
place
to
help
better
clarify
what
people
are
to
do.
L
L
There
are
concerns
and
you
know
we
want
people
to
do
good
things,
but
we
want
people
to
do
the
right
thing
and
I
certainly
don't
want
anybody
to
ever
come
to
me
and
say
well,
you
know
this
person
picked
up
my
dog
and,
and
now
it's
just
gone,
they
said
it's
and
and
I
have
no
recourse
to
help
that
person.
So.
A
E
You
I
talked
to
Julie
on
the
day
or
the
next
day
after
the
incident
that
mrs.
Peter
was
talking
about
the
part
that
gets
skipped
over
here
and
that
that
not
bothers
me.
It's
just
it's
just
something
that
that
is
gonna,
be
we
it's
just
gonna
keep
happening.
Is
that
gray
area
between
when
the
phone
call
came
in
and
said,
tell
me
what
allows
you
and
gives
you
the
authority
to
demand
this
animal
and
then
the
trigger
to
go
pick
it
up.
E
Okay,
it's
my
understanding
that
the
law
doesn't
specifically
say
that
you
have
that
authority.
There's
a
gray
area
there
that
is
undefined,
but
it
doesn't
say
that
somebody
else
has
the
authority
to
rescue
animals
on
their
own
without
the
involvement
of
other.
So
it's
almost
like
there's
an
omission
there
on
these
statutes
that
nobody
really
knows
where
they
stand,
the
the
discussion
of
right
and
wrong
and
what
they
should
do.
Then
there's
the
discussion
of.
E
When
do
we
send
the
sheriff's
police
out
because
there's
they
they
come
with
legal,
they
don't
come
with,
should
want
right
wrong
and
they
come
with
a
violation
of
law.
In
my
opinion,
and
that's
where
I
think
that
we
are
walking
into
a
wood
chipper,
if
we
don't
figure
that
out,
because
we
are
never
going
to
get
to
the
point
of
trust
with
the
public
and
I,
don't
know
how
to
get
to
that
point.
E
To
be
honest,
I
would
just
say
that
I
hope
we
don't
react
and
I
think
that's
where
you're
talking
about
things
could
have
been
done
different
on
all
sides.
Someone
could
not
have
dug
their
heels
in.
We
could
have
not
just
said:
okay,
send
the
police
out
there
I
think
that
if
we're
going
to
do
things,
there
better
be
more
than
just
this
one
situation
with
this
one,
because
it
causes
a
lot
of
trouble
that
we
should
probably
pick
our
battles
better.
E
But
then
there's
also
the
law
doesn't
say,
but
somebody
else
can't
and
that's
where
we're
at
you
know
so
I
just
want
to
explain
that.
But
I
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
being
we're
doing
the
best
we
can
customer
service
wise
but
it'd,
be
nice
of
our
employees
knew
where
that
line
was.
L
If
I
can
elaborate
on
that,
and
that's
exactly
what
I
told
chairman
Wheeler
looking
at
the
laws
that
I
review
and
and
and
I
have
to
go
back
to
them,
I
can't
always
pull
them
right
out
of
my
hat,
but
I
pretty
much
know
where
to
go.
Sometimes
it
takes
a
minute
to
find
it
in
the
Animal
Control
Act.
It
gives
us
the
authority
to
pick
up
stray
animals
I.
Think
the
there
was
a
lot
of
concern
throughout
the
state
of
shelters
taking
in
strays.
I
was
asked
by
the
Department
of
Ag
at
one
time.
L
What
gives
animal
control
the
authority
to
take
in
an
owner
surrender
you're
supposed
to
be
picking
up,
strays,
that's
exactly
what
they
told
us
and
we
said
well.
We
take
in
owner
surrenders
under
the
guidance
of
the
humane
care
act,
because
the
humane
care
act
addresses
shelters
who
are
supposed
to
be
taking
in
owner
surrenders
so
that
you
know
the
gray
is
just
it.
Probably.
The
entire
acts
need
to
be
started
over
and
rewritten.
L
However,
this
is
what
we
have
to
work
with
and
so
about
a
year
or
so
ago
they
amended
the
Animal
Welfare
Act,
even
though
the
Animal
Welfare
Act
tends
to
deal
with
breeders
and
cut
shops,
but
they
amended
that
act
to
say
if
an
individual
finds
an
animal
and
they
want
to
take
it
to
a
shelter
they
can.
The
shelter
is
then
supposed
to
vary
civically.
Do
report
to
us.
It
must
be
turned
over
to
us.
L
If
there's
a
chip,
an
ID,
a
tag
or
something
found,
we
can
ask
for
the
animal
and
in
our
ordinance
it
specifically
says
we
can
you
shall
turn
the
animal
over
unless
we
give
a
waiver
to
say
you
can
keep
it
again.
This
situation,
this
individual
stated
and
even
in
a
statement
that
she
read
at
the
meeting
that
she
had
already
called
a
private
shelter
and
they
said
we'll
take
it
in
under
our
umbrella
and
you
can
foster
it
for
us.
L
It's
even
more
complicated
because
the
head
of
that
shelter
had
told
me
in
my
office
just
a
month
or
two
before
that
they
were
no
longer
doing
their
dog
program
and
the
individual
that
gave
us
permission
was
not
allowed
to
take
any
dogs
in
so
it
you
know.
A
lot
of
these
things
are
why
we
responded
in
the
way
that
we
did
and,
as
chairman
Wheeler
said,
even
though
this
law
says
you
have
the
authority,
this
law
says
this
organization
could
do
it
under
this
Authority
in
this
guideline?
L
Nowhere
in
the
law
does
it
say,
but
an
individual
is
strictly
prohibited.
It
kind
of
puts
that
that
implication,
that
this
is
your
job
and
that
you
can
do
this
too,
but
it
doesn't
specifically
say-
and
that's
I'm,
going
to
try
to
work
with
our
own
state's
attorney
for
on
a
local
level,
and
I
would
like
to
talk
to
some
legislators
in
a
next
session
to
try
to
say
look
throughout
the
state.
This
is
a
concern
and
a
problem.
L
J
Thank
You.
Mr.
mrs.
chairman,
compliment
you
on
the
education
then,
because
even
you
admitted
that
you
had
to
look
up
some
of
these
things.
Well,
they
don't
have
it
at
their
fingertips.
You
know
to
look
up
and
if
you
ever
go
into
the
county
site,
there's
everything's
there.
It's
really
not
that
easy
to
find.
So
you
know
I
appreciate
that.
That's
the
direction
that
you're
taking
and
I
think
that
yeah
it's
gonna
take
some
time
to
heal.
You
know,
and
that
wasn't
a
good
situation,
but
let's
use
it
as
a
learning
experience.
J
A
K
Makers
real
briefly,
we
get
there
Express
nothing
between
peace,
officer,
police
officer
live
challenging
domestic
situations.
You
have
to
take
a
common-sense
approach
to
it
or
whatever.
If
you
reasonably
believe
that
you
know
you
want
to
basically
keep
the
peace
just
because
the
police
officer
shows
up
does
not
mean
that
the
law
is
been
broken.
Sometimes
you
can
ask,
and
I
will
do
that.
K
I'm,
unsure
I'm,
going
to
a
parents
house
and
the
individual
tends
to
be
very
aggressive
in
conversation,
whether
in
order
to
make
sure
that
nothing
escalates
and
I
reason
believe
that
there
is
going
to
be
some,
it
could
be
a
situation
that
could
ear
up
to
something
else.
You
have
a
officer
there,
also
the
peace
officer
until
you
make
them
a
police
officer
that
makes
sense.
A
Anything
else,
thank
you
for
all
your
presentation
today.
Then
next
we
have
the
recorders
report.
Let's
get
our
voices.
Is
there
our
motion
to
accept
that
report?
Mr.
Moore
are,
is
there
a
second
for
misnomer?
This
is
poker
all
in
favor
of
accepting
reports
say
aye
all
in
favor,
say
no,
and
the
motion
carries.
A
M
Busy
right,
we
actually
June,
is
turning
out
to
be
exceptional,
so
things
are
progressing
and
moving
in
the
right
direction,
as
we
had
kind
of
predicted.
Just
to
give
you
an
update
on
office
activities,
we
participated
in
law
week
out
at
KCC,
and
we
last
week
participated
in
the
senior
fair
at
the
quality
and
through
the
state's
attorney's
office,
our
property
fraud
promotion
that
we've
been
going
around
and
doing.
We
are
now
up
to
sixteen
hundred
and
seven
individuals
signed
up
for
property
fraud
alert.
M
Last
week
we
did
62
at
the
senior
fair,
so
things
are
catching
on
and
going
well
with
that
program
other
than
that
the
staff
just
continues
to
keep
working
on
backlog,
doing
an
exceptional
job,
we're
gonna
in
current
work,
assisting
customers
and
then
working
on
the
older
images
and
indexing
so
kudos
to
them
for
staying
on
track,
and
it's
really
about
all
I
have
right.
Now.
There.
A
M
Oh
yes,
I'm
two
months
ago,
ahead
to
go
and
testify
the
grand
jury
to
issues
warrants
for
two
individuals
on
a
property,
County
West
and
then
last
month,
I
was
contacted
by
a
person
whose
own
family
member
has
manipulated
the
property
in
their
own
name.
So
just
continuously
working
on
stuff,
like
that
utilizing
the
ordinance
that
this
committee,
you
know
worked
with
me
on
and
brought
to
the
full
County
Board
and
past,
allowed
me
to
go
to
directly
to
the
courts
when
they
is
a
fraudulent
activity
happening.