►
From YouTube: Kankakee County Board Meeting 11/9/2021
Description
Kankakee County Board Meeting 11/9/2021 9:00 AM
C
A
All
righty
moving
on
to
actually
the
the
vote
for
those
on
presume.
I
guess
starting
in
our
left,
corner,
miss
parker.
You
were
asking
to
be
here
via
zoom
today.
Yes,.
G
Hopefully
I
I've
been
wearing,
I
had
injured
my
leg,
my
ankle
and
I'm
still
wearing
the
boot,
and
it's
hurting
my
dis
being
able
to
get
around
quickly
sure.
A
And
mr
featherling
still
recovering
from
your
surgery.
Yes,
sir
reconstruction,
you
want
to
make
sure
stated
for
those
reasons.
Mr
donille,
you
were
requesting
zoom
today.
H
I
I
am
I
to
our
quadricep
tenon,
have
surgery
tomorrow,
we'll
be
in
a
cast
for
six
weeks
after
that.
A
G
A
Second
and
then
well,
we
have
to
get
to
miss
peters.
First,
I
want
to
see
if
we
can
miss
peters.
You
were
asking
for
zoom
today.
D
Thank
you.
Yes,
I
had
to
pick
up
my
daughter,
my
special
needs
daughter
from
college
and
she's
home,
and
I
didn't
want
to
bring
her
and
expose
her,
possibly
to
anything
before
she
goes
back.
So
I'm
requesting
zoom
today
and
it
was
unexpected.
A
Okay,
as
noted
with
the
one
exception
to
mr
dunhill,
is
there
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
for
this
meeting?
Mr
hunter,
a
second,
mr
long,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries.
Thank
you
under
public
commentary,
we've
got
a
few
here.
The
first
one
is
steve
hunter.
Anybody
ever
heard
of
this
guy
he's
out
of.
I
The
boat,
real,
quick
and,
and
I'm
going
to
speak
for
my
seat,
and
I
I
appreciate
you
guys
permitting
me
to
do
so-
try
to
be
real
brief.
As
a
child.
My
parents
taught
me
to
show
appreciation.
Oftentimes
we'd
go
to
my
dad's
lab
where
he
read.
I
He
was
over
the
lab
at
mantino
mental
health
center
and
oftentimes,
the
his
co-workers
or
his
subordinates
would
give
my
brother
and
I
silver
dollars,
and
and
after
that,
my
dad
and
mom
always
said
make
sure
you
guys
send
them
a
little
note
and
show
appreciation.
My
mom
was
from
a
family
of
16.
I
third
of
16
children,
so
I
had
a
lot
of
aunts
and
uncles
and
often
times
they
would
provide
us
gifts
and
so
forth.
And
of
course
again
my
parents
would
say
make
sure
you
show
appreciation
by
saying.
I
In
terms
of
this
county
for
the
109
000
people
in
this
county,
ranging
from
east
pembroke
and
to
the
west
reddick,
what
I
would
appreciate
if
the
chair
would
indulge
me
for
a
moment
to
ask
him
if,
indeed,
we
could
send
a
letter
to
the
illinois
delegation,
the
bipartisan
partisan
delegation,
some
of
which,
most
of
which
that
some
of
which,
I
should
say,
voted
for
those
particularly
two
programs.
I
As
we
well
know
what
transpired
last
friday
late
the
infrastructure
bill
passed,
and
it
was
a
bipartisan
bipartisan
initiative
passed
by
some
individuals
from
the
republican
party
and
predominantly
the
democratic
party,
some
of
which
were
members
of
the
illinois
delegation.
I
I
would
further
ask
if
he
could
draft
a
communication
and
offer
those
individuals
on
the
county
board
who
would
be
signatories
to
that
letter
showing
appreciation
to
those
individuals
who
supported
that
legislation
which
will
not
only
benefit
the
county
residents,
but
also
the
the
original
areas
as
well
too.
There
are
some
projects
which
have
been
held
up
and
and
put
on
the
back
burner
for
some
particular
period
of
time,
one
of
which
is
exit
312..
I
You
think
in
terms
of
what
has
transpired
in
the
past
in
terms
of
exit,
308,
315
and
most
recently
318,
so
hopefully
that
particular
project
will
be
bumped
up
a
little
bit,
which
will
benefit
eastgate
as
well
as
other
possibilities
of
development
in
the
east
side
of
the
city
of
kankakee.
I
Additionally,
other
projects
could
could
help
as
well
too.
Just
talking
to
chad
about
broadband.
I've
learned
a
lot
in
terms
of
how
broadband
could
impact
the
ag
community
and
this
county.
So,
mr
chairman,
if
you
would
consider
sending
a
communication
to
the
illinois
delegation
for
those
supporters
of
the
legislation
which
I
just
referenced
and
offered
the
opportunity
of
the
county
board
members
to
be
signatories
to
that
particular
letter,
thank
you.
J
J
J
The
criticism
of
this
map
is
not
about
protecting
incumbents.
It
is
about
the
rights
of
certain
groups
to
have
representation
on
this
board,
as
it
has
been
stated
of
the
seven
democrats
on
the
board.
Four
mapped
into
primaries
out
of
four
active
union
members,
three
mapped
into
primaries
out
of
the
six
women
on
this
board,
four
mapped
into
primaries
and
out
of
the
five
african-americans
on
this
board,
two
mapped
into
a
primary.
J
J
So
what
do
you
do
if
you
want
to
reduce
opportunities
for
groups
like
african
americans
through
gerrymandering?
You
use
packing?
It's
been
done
for
years,
instead
of
five
six
or
seven
districts
that
have
fifty
to
fifty
five
percent
african-american
voters,
you
create
just
four
with
super
majorities
of
eighty
to
ninety
percent
african
american
voters.
J
I
would
also
note
there
was
one
group
of
incumbents
that
was
protected
by
this
map
white
men.
Now,
I'm
an
old
white
man
and
I
have
nothing
against
them.
However,
it
is
concerning
that
of
the
17
white
men
on
this
board.
Only
one
was
placed
in
a
primary
that
one
white
man,
larry
kirkstra,
happens
to
be
a
democrat
and
a
union
activist.
J
J
Another
argument
that
was
made
for
this
map
is
the
drop
in
population
in
the
city
of
kankakee.
It
did
drop,
but
the
only
districts
there
combined
were
those
represented
by
african-american
board
members
kind
of
strange
that
districts
represented
by
chris
tholen,
jacob
collins
or
joseph
swanson
were
not
merged
I'll
leave
it
to
the
public
to
question.
Why?
J
J
It
really
is
an
easy
fix,
rescind
the
current
map
take
the
previous
past
map
and
tweak
it
seek.
Some
public
input
show
the
public.
The
printed
maps
on
large
poster
boards
show
them
the
impact
of
the
changes
and
then
in
the
offending
districts,
simply
move
a
few
streets
here
and
there
to
meet
the
equal
sized
district
requirement.
K
Good
morning
my
name
is
john
howard
and
I
represent
kankakee
county
youth
intervention
agency,
which
is
located
in
hopkins
park
where
the
licensed
daycare
center
and
the
youth
agency
there
and
many
other
programs
come
through
our
agency.
We
are
the
second
largest
employee
in
pembroke
township
hopkins
park
on.
K
I
submit
a
proposal
to
the
county
board
on
august
16
2021
requested
funding
through
the
american
rescue
plan
to
upgrade
our
center
and
then
again.
On
october,
4th
2021,
I
submitted
a
funding
application
which
the
commissioner
payton
required
and
asked
the
business
out
there
to
submit
in
to
the
county
board.
K
I
think
it's
unfair
if
you're
going
to
post
something
in
the
newspaper
and
ask
for
those
requests
at
hopkins
park,
premier
township
being
the
most
impoverished
community
in
kankakee
county,
and
we
don't
get
a
response
now,
there's
only
approximately
two
or
three
business,
that's
out
in
hopkins
park
and
we're
the
ones
that
have
not
received
a
word.
K
L
Good
morning
my
name
is
marlene
aumiller,
I'm
a
secretary
of
the
illinois
democratic
women
of
kankakee
county,
as
well
as
a
community
activist
for
human
and
civil
rights.
I'm
here
today
to
ask
the
county
board
to
rescind
the
recently
passed
county
board
member
map.
The
revised
map
pits
four
women
against
each
other
in
the
primaries,
two
of
which
are
in
the
same
party.
This
is
completely
unnecessary
and
did
not
happen
in
the
previous
map.
L
L
However,
it
appears
that
the
kankakee
county
board's
leadership
is
trying
to
decrease
the
voices
of
women
in
kankakee
county.
This
is
2021
and
is
unacceptable.
Women
have
fought
for
the
right
to
vote
and
hold
elected
offices.
They
need
to
have
a
voice
in
the
decisions
made
in
kankakee
county
government.
The
map
reduces
women.
Having
that
voice,
you
need
to
invalidate
this
map.
A
Under
we
have
no
announcements,
appointments,
proclamations
or
certificates.
Today
we
have
the
minutes
of
the
last
meeting
october
12
2021.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
there?
Mr
carrico,
a
second
miss
polk,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
under
claims
committee
reports.
C
Mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
county
board
you're
committing
on
county
claim
to
beg
league
to
report
they've
examined
the
following
claims
presented
and
recommend
payment.
The
clerk
is
hereby
authorized
and
directed
to
issue
orders
to
the
several
claimants
total
claims.
For
the
month
of
september
2021,
8
million
480
691.16.
A
All
right
is
there
a
motion
on
that,
mr
lear.
Second,
mr
payton,
without
any
questions,
roll
call
please.
F
D
A
Motion
carries
under
department
reports,
just
wanna
note
that
there
is
no
billing
report
in
your
packet.
We
didn't
have
one
this
month
made
it
on
the
agenda.
Just
note
that
for
the
for
the
record,
we
won't
be
voting
on
that.
C
Recorder's
monthly
report
for
september
2021
disbursement
fees
paid
to
the
county,
treasurer
of
179
742
dollars
and
three
cents
county
clerk's
monthly
report
for
september
2001.,
2021
total
of
twenty
six
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
one
dollars:
thirteen
cents,
animal
control,
monthly
report
for
september,
two
thousand
twenty
one
total
of
twenty
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
and
ninety
three
dollars
the
iptip
building
fund.
6.37
total
animals
handled
87.
A
All
righty
is
there
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve?
Second,
mr
fairfield,
without
any
absent
any
questions,
voice
vote,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries.
Thank
you
under
consent.
The
first
consent
for
today
is
there
anything
to
be
removed
and
considered
separately.
A
A
Aye
motion
carries
under
highway
and
buildings,
just
the
general
concurring
resolution.
I
believe
that
is
the
tire
concurring
resolution
concurring
resolution.
Is
there
a
motion
to
pay
these
bills?
I
guess
is
the
way
to
put
it
mr
hildeberry
hildebrand
alexander,
mr
long
with
a
second.
Without
any
questions,
roll
call
vote.
Please.
C
Mr
hatch,
mrs
polk
aye,
mr
snipes,
all
right,
mr
sidroy
aye,
mr
lear
aye.
This
is
weber,
mrs
peters
hi,
mr
payton,
mrs
parker
aye,
mr
fairfield
aye,
mr
carico
aye,
mr
atkoff
aye,
mr
fatherling
aye,
mr
donnell
aye,
mr
miller
aye,
mr
long
aye,
mr
kirkstra
aye,
mr
hunter.
Yes,
miss
brian
aye,
mr
collins,
aye,
ms
hudson
aye,
mr
alexander
aye,
mr
gallagher
aye,
mr.
A
N
There
you
go
all
right:
this
is
a
request
by
property
owners,
vernon
and
jacqueline
osenga
and
applicant
larry
osango,
which
is
vernon's
brother,
to
request
a
variance
for
lot
with
road
frontage
on
a
2.35
acre
parcel
located
at
2510
2000
south
road
in
limestone
township.
You
can
see
it
on
the
screen
there
outlined
in
red.
The
parcel
was
created
in
1991,
utilizing
an
easement
along
the
right
hand,
side
of
that
farm
field,
and
our
ordinance
requires
that
you
have
actual
frontage
on
a
road.
This
one
does
not.
N
A
A
N
Tell
what
do
you
got
on
this
greg
and
michelle
osanga
not
related
to
the
previous
osingas?
As
far
as
I
know,
own,
a
6.03
acre
parcel
outlined
in
red,
they
also
own
the
farmland
both
to
the
east
and
west
of
that
property.
N
They
would
like
to
divide
out
the
0.81
acre
parcel
that
has
a
residence
on
it
that
is
outlined
in
blue
there's
a
there's,
an
easement
that
runs
along
through
there
there's
already
two
other
houses
along
that
easement.
It
has
an
existing
house,
they'd
like
to
be
able
to
divide
off
that,
to
sell
it
and
keep
the
area
that's
still
outlined
in
red
as
part
of
the
farm
and
merged
that,
in
with
the
other
two
parcels,
both
zoning
board
and
county
are
in
planning
and
zoning
recommended
the
approval
on
this
one
as
well.
A
There
a
motion:
are
you
going
on
this,
mr
miller,
to
approve?
Second,
mr
fairfield
seems
pretty
straightforward
anything
else.
Let's
do
a
voice
vote.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
same
sign,
osha
carries.
C
N
Okay,
leonard
and
linda
splett
own
the
40
acre
parcel
outlined
in
red
and
would
like
to
divide
that
into
two
20
acre
parcels.
The
one
outlined
in
blue
is
20
acres.
It
has
a
home
on
it.
The
entire
40
acres
is
owned,
r1
single
family,
residential
and
our
ordinance
requires
a
special
use
permit
for
residential
on
anything
larger
than
two
acres.
N
If
this
was
zoned,
a1
agriculture,
as
it's
being
used,
we
wouldn't
even
be
here
for
the
special
use
permit.
I
see.
Okay,
both
zoning
board
and
planning
and
zoning
recommend
approval.
N
A
A
motion
on
this
one,
mr
long
to
approve
second
miss
brian
second,
all
right.
Any
questions
about
this
one
voice
fold,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
same
sign.
Ocean
carries
moving
on
to
408.
C
A
Get
going,
is
there
a
motion
on
this
one,
mr
galler,
a
second,
mr
collins,
you
want
to
get
into
the
nature
of
this
sure.
N
We
currently,
our
ordinance,
allows
cannabis
dispensing
facilities
in
the
commercial
district
in
the
industrial
district.
But
when
you
look
at
the
county
map,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
area
that
is
zoned
either
industrial
or
commercial.
N
N
Also,
we've
had
a
few
inquiries
on
some
properties
and
we
would
like
to
change
the
minimum
setback
from
2500
feet,
which
is
almost
a
half
a
mile
to
1500
feet
a
little
over
a
quarter
mile
that
will
open
up
some
additional
viable
properties,
we'd
also
like
to
remove
manufactured
home
communities
or
parks
from
the
setback
requirement.
We
could
not
really
understand
why
that
was
put
in
there
in
the
first
place,
residential
is
residential
and
then
under
drive
through
services
and
under
outdoor
sales.
N
We'd,
like
the
text
added
that
says,
accept
that
those
are
not
permitted
but
except
during
times
when
indoor
sales
and
operations
are
not
possible
due
to
extraordinary
circumstances
and
we'd
like
that,
added
to
both
section
d
and
section
f,
both
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
and
planning
and
zoning
recommend
approval
of
this
text.
Amendment.
A
E
P
I
partially
agree
with
mr
hess.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
cannabis
distribution.
However,
I'm
very
disturbed
that
it
will
be
closer
to
schools,
churches,
playgrounds
prisons.
P
I
think
we
have
enough
land
in
the
county
that
we
can
provide
for
this
without
infringing
about
half
of
us
feel,
as
mr
hess
does,
and
others
of
us
are
somewhere
in
between-
and
some
of
us
are
very
pro,
I
just
don't
want
to
be
offended
offensive
to
persons
who
feel
very
strongly,
as
mr
hestos
and
others
many
others
and
put
it
in
very
close
to
their
front
yards
or
where
they
would
have
to
drive
by
taking
their
children
to
church
or
school.
P
A
Sure
any
others,
mr
crowlands.
Q
I
totally
agree
with
with
mr
hess
that
we
don't
need
a
dispensary,
because
it's
already
here,
marijuana
is
everywhere
in
our
county,
it's
everywhere
in
our
state
and
respectfully
it's
not
a
matter
of
our
feelings
of
whether
or
not
businesses
should
be
allowed
to
operate
within
the
guidelines
of
the
law
anywhere.
It's
not
a
that.
We've
lost
the
war
on
drugs
people,
the
drugs
won
they're
here,
so
we
may
as
well
put
a
nice
business
on
our
tax
roll
and
try
and
regulate
and
incorporate
it
into
our
society
as
much
as
possible.
Q
Q
M
I
probably
disagree
that
is
everywhere,
because
it's
not
in
my
house,
it's
not
in
my
sister's
in
them
houses
it's
not
at
our
church.
So
therefore
I
would
probably
object
to
the
fact
that
it's
everywhere
whether
drugs
win
or
not,
is
subjective.
I
don't
believe
that
drugs
win.
I
still
believe
that
god
wins.
M
I
think
it
has
its
primary
purposes
along
with
codeine
and
everything
else
when
it's
being
utilized
in
hospitals
and
medical
facilities,
but
just
for
recreational
purposes.
I
am
not
a
proponent
of
so
I
will
be
voting
no.
A
Any
other
thoughts
from
the
board
know
that
these
changes
were
based
on
what
the
market
dictates,
that
a
dispensing
facility
will
not
locate
in
the
middle
of
nowhere
in
rural
kankakee
county.
They
want
traffic
flow
and
those
places
in
the
county
that
are
advantageous
to
where
we
would
make
the
tax
revenue
are
in
those
locations
that
are
not
rural
and
remote
and
where
no
traffic
goes
by.
So
I'm
just
making
sure
you
understand
the
business
side
of
this
before
anything
else.
A
The
people
that
want
to
locate
are
looking
for
traffic
count,
and
so,
if
you
think
about
where
does
the
county
have
jurisdiction?
Where
there's
a
lot
of
people,
you
can
kind
of
put
things
together
that
that's
why
these
regulations
and
these
special
uses
have
been
honed,
because
that's
what
that
business
model
requires
for
them
to
be
viable.
So
it's
it's
not
just
us
saying
we're
going
to
stick
them
in
a
little
corner
of
the
county,
where
there's
three
houses
around
it,
and
so
the
kids
and
everybody's
safe
from
the
evil.
Devil's
lettuce.
A
Then
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
that's
not
a
viable
business
model
and
we
won't
get
anybody
to
support
the
county
services
that
are
being
attacked
by
the
legislation
in
springfield.
This
is
a
revenue
source.
This
is
not
a
marketing
program
to
get
children
to
go,
buy
weed.
Okay!
I
just
want
to
let
people
understand
that,
because
there
seems
to
be
somewhat
of
a
misconception
not
only
in
this
room
but
elsewhere.
A
R
Siroi.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
This
is
just
a
question
for
maybe
you
or
dell
or
any
any
other
board
member.
Do
we
know
what
the
state
of
illinois
pulled
from
marijuana
tax
revenue
last
year?
He
was
a
billion.
A
Dollars
a
billion
dollars,
I
think
that's
or
no.
That
was
the
start.
I
think
up
until
this
point
it's
been
a
billion
dollars
in
tax
revenue.
I
believe
that's
what
I
heard
I
may
be
wrong,
but
I
think
that's
total
from
day
one
to
now
is
a
billion.
If
anyone
out
there
has
that
number,
I
heard
a
billion,
but
I
just
don't
know
the
time
frame
collins,
mr
collins.
Q
I
don't
have
that
number,
but
I
do
believe
you're
in
the
ballpark.
I
would
also
point
out
that
illinois
probably
would
have
drawn
a
lot
more
than
they
did
last
year
if
we
didn't
have
the
highest
taxes
on
marijuana
in
the
nation
for
recreational
sales,
that's
literally
what
drives
your
black
market.
Q
So
when
mr
hess,
who
I
understand
you
have
a
very,
very
valid
concern
of
not
wanting,
I
don't
want
children,
smoking
pot
and
skip
in
school
to
get
high
at
the
state
park,
like
many
of
us
may
have
done
or
may
not
done
in
the
past.
But
the
fact
is
that
when
you
have
these
high
taxes
and
or
you
don't
allow
these
facilities,
you
drive
the
black
market
and
to
respond
to
mr
snipes.
Q
One
of
the
biggest
problems
facing
our
country
is
over
criminalization
and
the
laws
that
have
prohibited,
especially
marijuana,
have
driven
up
the
number
of,
in
particular
brown
people
being
incarcerated
in
our
country.
It
is
one
of
the
things
that
has
absolutely
decimated
your
community
in
our
community,
therefore,
because
we
we
end
up
with
so
many
people
that
are
non-violent
in
the
prison
system,
because
we
keep
trying
to
fight
this
war
on
drugs.
That
is
just
unwinnable.
A
A
M
You
let
me
realize
something
because
I've
worked
in
the
penitentiary,
so
I
kind
of
know
a
little
bit
about
it,
but
let
me
bring
it
back
home.
I
work
with
I
work
in
education,
so
therefore
I
see
the
other
effect
of
marijuana.
I
understand
that
people,
you
know,
have
the
right
to
smoke.
It
that's
21
and
over
not
under.
However,
those
that
are
under
21
are
smoking.
M
It
and
a
matter
of
fact
I'll
submit
to
you
that
the
children
that
don't
smoke
it
have
to
inhale
it,
and
not
only
that
it's
on
it's
on
their
clothes.
We
call
it
in
the
school
special
cologne
and
it's
not
the
fault
of
the
child,
but
the
other
children
are
disturbed
when
they
smell
it.
So,
as
a
result,
we
have
to
change
clothes
in
the
whole
nine
yards,
so
there
are
some
other
effects
that
goes
on
just
simply
passing
things
to
pass
it.
M
We
need
to
kind
of
look
at
it
in
a
in
a
more
broad
and
light
a
more
but
a
more
narrow
scope
when
it
comes
to
we're
just
saying
you
know
almost
like
the
commodores
when
they
wrote
the
song,
I
want
to
be
high,
so
I
not
everybody
want
to
be
high.
We
can
be
high
off
of
fun
and
other
things,
but
in
this
case
outside
of
medical
purposes
or
whatever.
M
I
think
we
forget
that
our
children
are
being
affected
by
this,
whether
they
want
it
or
not,
and
so,
when
you
go
buy
homes
and
have
to
do
home
visits,
it's
the
first
thing
you
smell
the
weather,
then
it
gets
in
your
clothes
and
that's
a
cleaning
bill.
So
I
I
see
the
other
side
of
this
that
you're,
not
the
not
so
pretty
side,
and
so
therefore
I
I
continue
to
stand
by
my
reasoning
that
no
we
don't
need
it.
You
got
one
that's
coming
out
in
bradley.
M
I
don't
believe
in
putting
in
areas
that
we
don't
have
sufficient
police
protection.
So
there
are
some
areas
that
I
just
I
see
the
other
side
of
the
pitcher
on
the
side
of
the
corn.
So
that's,
I
would
still
say
no.
P
Can
we
do
this
as
an
isolated
case?
I
don't
think
we're.
Gonna
have
20
dispensaries
in
our
town
and
I
would
hate
to.
A
To
answer
your
question,
this
is
the
framework
everyone
that
comes
before
the
board
will
have
to
meet
these
criteria
and
any
others
that
are
put
under
it
by
zba
pza.
So
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
baseline
framework
correct
me
if
I'm
wrongdel,
this
is
so
we
have
something
on
the
book.
So
when
people
approach
us,
they
know
what
our
rules
are,
we
could
come
in
and
say
hours
of
operation
limitations.
You
know
whatever
this
is
just
way
too
close
to
to
this
that
or
the
other.
This
doesn't.
A
N
That
is
correct
this.
This
is
just
the
regulations
and
in
fact
the
regulations
are
already
established.
This
is
just
some
changes
to
it
right.
So
a
no
vote
today
does
not
eliminate
the
regulations
just
the
changes,
but
it
is
a
special
use
permit
in
any
of
these
districts,
which
means
conditions
can
be
placed
upon
them,
so
you
can
take
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
An
example
would
be
hours
of
operation
days
of
operation,
various
things
like
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
P
M
A
Q
S
Q
A
All
right,
so
we
is
there
any
anything
else
now
I
think
we
covered.
A
Do
a
roll
call
vote
if
that's
okay,
just
to
get
that
over
with,
because
I'm
sure
someone
will
call
for
it
shortly.
So
we
can
go
with
the
roll
call
vote.
B
D
C
T
D
A
C
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
moving
on
to
executive
if
we
could
get
the
the
title
read
in
the
record
by
the
way,
thanks
for
your
debate,
that's
kind
of
the
way
it
should
work
resolution.
A
All
right
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
here
to
start
with
mr
lear.
Second,
mr
long
just
brief
explanation,
this
is
what
is
necessary
for
us
to
be
able
to
move
forward
on
paying
for
and
contracting
for
the
work
to
be
done
out
at
the
lift
station,
not
just
today,
but
in
phase
one
for
the
the
repair,
but
also
for
phase
two.
This
covers
basically
the
gamut
up
until
that
not
to
exceed
number
that
we've
already
established.
A
If
anything
else
needs
to
go
above
and
beyond,
it
would
come
back
through
the
finance
committee
and
then
back
to
the
board
for
an
increase
or
whatever
other
modifications
need
to
be
done
per
engineers,
and
things
like
that
and
you
know,
permits
that
have
to
be
applied
for
so
this
document
has
to
exist
to
remove
all
liability
from
the
county,
because
it's
not
our
project,
we're
paying
for
it,
and
so
just
for
explanation
sake
that
we
don't
want
to
carry
that
liability
forward
for
20
years
and
have
something
break
and
then
they
say:
well,
you
fixed
it.
A
You
got
to
pay
for
it
and
I
think
mr
payton
is
shaking.
He
understands
that
that
mentality.
You
know
we
don't
want,
because
we're
always
not
going
to
be
here
down
the
road.
This
needs
to
to
be
in
place.
So
did
we
get
motions?
Yet
we
did
okay.
So
any
other
questions
just
to
to
tighten
all
this
up
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page.
A
We
can
go
voice
vote
here.
Then
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
those
opposed
well.
Actually
this
will
spend
money
at
some
point.
Yeah
roll
call,
please
sorry.
A
Wheeler
aye
motion
carries
the
next
one.
If
we
get
that
read
the
title,
please
resolution.
A
All
right,
so
that
is
3-1-2.
That's
a
typo!
Okay,
just
want
to
make
sure.
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
to
approve
mrs
weber?
Second,
miss
polk
with
a
second
a
brief
explanation.
This
we
discussed
this
in
finance.
A
I
believe
where
we
started
to
run
into
a
problem
of
a
non-for-profit
applying
for
arpa
funds,
but
the
way
our
policies
were
set
up,
there
was
no
delineation
between
a
non-for-profit
that
is
just
for
operates
within
a
municipality
and
one
that
is
county-wide,
and
this
has
to
do
with
our
requirement
that
there
be
a
match
locally,
or
at
least
we
pay
for
half
and
they
have
to
go
to
the
city
for
the
other
half
it
would
I'll
use
an
example
like
harbor
house.
A
That's
a
county-wide
organization,
just
because
they're
in
kankakee,
we
shouldn't
limit
our
funding.
That's
what
this
resolution
is
saying
and
that's
what
finance
was
asking.
Should
we
codify
this
as
a
policy?
And
so
I
thought
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
ten
thousand
dollar
allocations
that
you'll
see
coming
up
for
these
not-for-profits
without
this
they'll
have
to
be
changed
to
five
thousand.
You
unders
because
they're
within
a
municipality,
so
that's
why
this
is
in
front
of
you
did.
I
explain
that.
A
Well,
our
current
policy
says
if
you're,
a
not-for-profit
within
a
you,
know,
municipality
that
you
you're
eligible
for
five
thousand
dollars,
basically
from
the
county.
This
would
say
if
you're
county-wide
and
you
could
document
that
by
maybe
zip
codes
of
those
you
serve
or
some
other
method,
we're
being
very
flexible
on
that
method.
U
Well,
what
I'm
asking
is
the
one
that
we're
talk
looking
at
is
from
september
september
14th,
but
where
is
the
one
that
we?
What
we
said
is
you
know
this
one,
the
one
that's
in
our
packet
is
is
the
you
know.
It
says
9
14,
which
means
we
approved
it
at
september,
14th
this
one
which
should
say
something
about
you
don't
have
to.
How
can
you
you
know
this?
One
doesn't
say
that
you
don't
have
to
do
the
50,
or
is
there
a
line
here
that
I'm
missing?
Do
you.
T
The
way
it
was
written
was
that
we,
as
the
chairman,
said,
we're
penalizing
our
are
not
prop
and
not
for
profits
they're
in
cities
and
by
forcing
them
to
get
a
second
a
match,
so
to
speak.
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
to
even
the
even
the
playing
field
so
that
not
pro
deserving
non-profits
are
not
penalized
that
we're
able
then
to
fund
appropriately
across
the
board
and
across
the
county.
A
So
if
the
not-for-profit
does
work
with
only
in
one
city
and
that's
what
their
main
focus
of
the
not-for-profit
is,
then
we
think
it
would
be
subject
to
that
to
that
requirement.
But
if
it's
their
county-wide
organization,
then
we
should
support
them
as
a
county.
Correct.
T
U
Your
question:
well,
it
ends,
I
perfectly
agree
with
everything
and
even
though
the
fun
projects
were
going
to
approve
result
in
those
things,
the
5
000.
But
I
I
wonder,
I
don't
see
how
this
is
an
amendment.
Where
is
the
amended
part?
If
this
is
that,
because
our
document
says
the
creation
of
the
rescue
plan
requirements
for
business
and
nonprofit
and
it
it
includes
the
50.
So
where
is
the
part
that
says
if
you,
if
you
serve
county
wide,
you
don't
have
to
meet
that.
A
Yes,
mr
leader,.
V
V
Page
30
33,
mr
chairman,
is
it
true
that
the
be
with
resolve
refers
to
requirements
that
are
not
mentioned
in
the
resolution?.
V
Lyrically,
I'm
sorry
the
be
it
resolved
the
first
paragraph
where
it
says
now,
therefore,
it
be
resolved.
The
resolution
refers
to
requirements
for
the
non-profit,
business
and
non-profit
organizations.
Those
requirements
are
not
stated
in
this
resolution.
I
think
that's
what
miss
weber's
referring
to
am
I
correct
miss
weber.
U
T
U
U
A
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
scott.
I
got
a
question
as
we
well
know,
we
listened
to
state
attorney,
rowe,
discussing
domestic
violence
and
the
escalating
numbers
and
the
special
court
treatment
of
those
particular
issues.
Now
we
just
heard
the
the
comments
regarding
caps
for
ten
thousand
dollars
for
macro
organizations,
keep
in
mind
that
the
numbers
that
roe
provides
to
us
regarding
domestic
violence.
I
Now,
what
kind
of
discretion
can
we
use
counselor
with
respect
to
not
adhering
to
that
ten
thousand
dollar
cap?
In
other
words,
let's
say,
for
example,
a
harbor
house
comes
forward
and
says
we
need
25
000..
Now,
how
might
that
be
accomplished?
A
We
would
have
to
go
back
through
that
legislative
process
through
executive
committee
and
establish
or
amend
the
current
policy
that
we've
adopted.
Okay,
we
also
can
reauthorize
another
round
of
this
down
the
road
and
that's
what
we
talked
about
was
is:
let's
not
jump
into
the
deep
end,
all
at
once.
Yeah.
Is
that
because
we
don't
know
how
cold
lawn
cover
was
going
to
last,
we
didn't
know
how
long
the
impact
was
going
to
last.
We
may
have
sustainable
injury
to
businesses
and
not-for-profits
for
years
to
come,
so
what
it
was.
A
I
Okay-
and
I
I
think
vice
chairman
cyril
may
have
mentioned
that
before,
if
my
memory
serves
me
correct,
because
for
for
example,
and
I'm
I'm
just
speaking
to
a
parallel
of
harbor
house
garden
of
prayer
garden
of
prayer-
I
mean
you
know.
If
I
had
you
know
if
I
was
a
really
rich
man,
you
know
I'd
make.
You
know
additional
donations
that
I
do
provide
for
that
particular
organization,
their
macro
they're,
a
five-star
organization.
I
Ten
thousand
dollars
is
nice,
but
they
need
more
than
that
and
it's
justified.
So
that's
all
I'm
saying
is
that
I
I
agree
with
you
and
yeah
and
you're
on
you're,
on
the
record
and-
and
I
do
reflect
or
go
back
to
what
todd
had
mentioned
some
time
ago
and
with
another
situation.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah,
it's
just
tough,
because
the
treasury
didn't
define
this
as
steve.
Mccarty
knows
you
know
really.
The
law
was
written
in
shades
of
gray
and
the
interpretations
are
basically
when
you
submit
your
quarterly
report
to
tell
us
how
to
spend
the
money.
We'll
tell
you
if
you
did
it
right
or
not,
there's
not
a
lot
of
clear
direction,
so
it
wasn't
in
our
best
interest
to
jump
in
and
the
other
side
of
it
is
anything
over
50
000.
A
They
have
to
be
data
certified
and
eligible,
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
businesses
out
there
that
are
able
to
to
say
that
so
those
caps
would
ultimately
fall
under
that
number
anyway.
I
think,
just
by
the
way
that
arpa
works,
I
mean,
if
you
think
about
it.
Logically,
most
most
people
are
only
get
a
compliance
certified
if
they
get
grants
and
things
like
that
right
now,
which
puts
it
in
the
not-for-profit
and
government
entity
area.
So
thank
you
for
your
comments.
Any
other
thoughts
on
this
all
right.
A
A
Motion
carries
moving
on
to
finance.
A
Second,
mr
long
any
questions
steve
is
here
on
this:
it's
kind
of
a
yearly
thing
we
do,
even
though
that
amount
has
become
increasingly
less
and
less
and
less
and
less
and
less
over
the
years,
so
otherwise
roll
call
vote.
A
Motion
carries
thank
you.
The
the
budget
number
411.,
the
title
of
that.
A
No
motion
to
prove
the
budget,
mr
lear.
Thank
you
for
that.
A
second
second
miss
hudson,
let's
dive
into
it,
is
there
any
questions.
It
was
a
pretty
expansive
document,
mr
hunter.
W
Some
of
the
highlights
we
covered
at
the
finance
committee,
the
general
fund,
total
balance,
32.6
million
the
debt
service,
debt
service
and
special
revenue
funds,
31.3
highway
funds,
30.3
million
and
health
department
911
9.6.
So
the
total
funding
you
have
you
for
you
with
total
budget
104
million
32
176.
W
it's
about
12
million
higher
than
our
original
fy21,
primarily
due
to
budgeting
of
the
arka
funds
and
the
the
fy
22
general
fund.
Expense
budget
is
1.4
million
less
than
the
fy21
budget
that
we're
currently
finishing
up.
Those
are
some
of
the
highlights
big
picture.
A
I
I
don't
remember
that
I
remember
I
remember
staff,
but
I
thought
it
was
somebody
for
for
steve,
but
you
know.
A
So,
and
and
your
estimate
on
that
steve-
that's
still
we're
keeping
our
head
above
water,
okay,
because
it's
not
like
all
the
other
stuff
stopped
when
arpa
got
here,
it
only
escalated.
So
any
other
thoughts-
and
I
just
the
the
one
of
the
the
things
that
you
should
note
is-
is
that
you
know
when
we
we
started
crawling
out
of
the
hole
was
was
basically
when
the
board
amended
the
budget
on
the
floor
back
in
2015
for
2016
year.
A
That
was
the
first
time
that
we
started
the
shift
and
we
took
control
of
the
finances
we
dug
ourselves
out
of
a
huge
hole,
but
now
that
that
that
wave
has
kind
of
got
to
the
top
covert
stopped
our
growth.
The
state
has
also
kneecapped
us
and
stolen
some
of
our
revenue
and
giving
it
to
other
states.
A
But
when
you
see
that
curve
it's
starting
to
dip
and
that's
because
we've
had
to
shift
the
levees
which
we'll
see
more
about
coming
up
by
by
not
allocating
as
much
to
the
tort
fund
and
pushing
that
to
the
general
fund
because
we're
a
tax
cap
county,
a
lot
of
people,
don't
know
that
we
can't
just
arbitrarily
increase
taxes
over
voluminous
amounts.
So
it's
it's.
We've
done
things
to
be
able
to
get
us
through
this
time
period
to
hopefully
wait
until
our
revenue
stabilize
in
the
future.
A
We've
made
plans-
and
we
could
do
this
for
a
year
two
years-
probably,
but
sooner
or
later
the
torque
fund
will
start
to
to
get
drained.
And
where
were
we
at
back
in
16
negative
in.
W
The
combined
the
three
major
funds
are
negative
4.6.
A
4.6
million
that
doesn't
include
the
4
million.
We
borrow
from
the
banks
every
year
that
doesn't
include
the
interfund
borrowing.
The
number
was
around
15
million.
We
were
behind
every
year
to
start
off
with
we're,
not
there
anymore
and
we're
not
going
to
go
back
there.
So
this
is
a
good
budget.
I
will
tell
you
that
and
steve
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
it.
A
Anita
steve
and
I
have
worked
on
it
tremendously.
We
thank
the
department
heads
for
their
input
and
then
basically
knowing
that
you're
realizing,
there's
not
a
lot
there
to
work
with.
We
haven't
seen
a
lot
of
big
increases
well
outside
of
the
arpa
spending,
so
that,
besides
that,
if
we
didn't
have
that
it
would
be
much
worse.
Obviously
any
other
questions.
W
A
Aye
motion
carries
we
go
to
412..
You
can
get
that
redmi
record.
A
Zero
motion
on
this
as
well
miss
polk
a
second,
mr
fairfield.
Pretty
much
standard
fare.
You
got
the
the
numbers.
I
don't
know.
If
there's
anything,
you
need
to
speak
on
anita
on
this.
If
there's
any
questions
for
anita
about
our
renewal
seems
like
we've
was
all
explained
at
finance
in
depth.
A
A
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
one
to
start
with
mr
ackoff,
mr
hunter,
with
a
second
anything
you
wanna
mention
dan
about
this.
C
When
you
had
voted
to
approve
the
pull
pads
before,
I
received
the
invoice
from
our
company
no
inc,
they
had
forgotten
to
include
the
tray
that
you
use
to
scan
the
driver's
licenses
on
it's
six
dollars
at
162
units.
It's
972
dollars
different
than
the
original
quote.
A
This
just
amends
that
so
we
had
a
motion
in
a
second
pretty
standard
comes
out
of
the
arpa
loss
revenue
fund,
so
not
general
fund.
We'll
call,
though,
please.
D
A
Hi
motion
carries
now
we
get
to
our
arpa
consent
agenda.
I
like
to
mention
that
413
there's
a
typo
in
there.
Instead
of
bourbon
a
it,
should
say
moments
we
just
used
the
same
template
from
the
other
park
district
that
we
initially
started
with
so
that'll
be
fixed
and
then
obviously
on
419
noted
what
mr
snipes
was
stating
from.
But
beyond
that
is
there
anything
that
needs
to
be
removed
to
consider
separately.
Okay,.
A
No
well.
Can
we
note
in
the
voting
record,
that
he's
abstaining
from
that
one
instead
of
pulling
it?
Thank
you
any
other
thoughts
there
motion
to
combine
and
approve,
then,
would
be
in
order,
mrs
weber.
Second,
mr
long,
we
should
probably
get
them
thread
into
the
record.
C
All
of
these
will
be
authorizing
expenditures
from
fiscal
year
2021
fund
95,
the
american
rescue
plan
fund
to
the
following
moments:
park
district
chiropractic,
associates
of
kangaki
merchant
street
art
gallery
good
shepherd
manor
chatterbox,
cafe:
options
center
for
independent
living
garden
of
prayer,
youth
center
child
network
kaneki,
county
recorder's
office,
21st
judicial
circuit
court,
kaneki,
county
circuit
clerk's
office
and
pembroke
township
pumping
station
repair.
They
don't
do
anything
all
right.
A
Motion
carries
we
have
some
openings.
I've
heard.
A
All
righty,
thank
you,
sir
moving
under
new
business.
Mr.
I
Chairman,
yes,
sir
yeah,
thank
you
very
much,
miss
chairman.
How
do
we
publicize
these
these
openings?
Because
I
know
I
I've
heard
some
concern
and
there
may
be
a
communication
being
sent
to
you
about
some
things
that
I
don't
think
quite
kosher,
but
for,
for
example,
there
was
something
open
there
was
opening.
Previously,
I
think
on
the
essex
fire
protection
district
or
something
there
were
some
concerns
about
people
of
color,
and
my
question
was:
do
you
have
any
people
look
like
me
who
live
in
essex.
A
Ridiculous
and
and
the
history
of
what
we've
done
here
has
been
completely
opposite
of
those
statements.
You
know
we,
we
didn't
have
african-american
representation
on
the
zba
as
far
as
I
ever
knew,
and
I
took
it
upon
myself
to
reach
out
in
the
city
of
kankakee,
because
you
have
to
have
one
from
each
one
board.
Member
from
each
township.
A
There
can't
be
two
from
the
same
one
and
found
somebody
who
had
robust
experience
in
the
kanken
key
planning
side
of
things,
so
the
other
side
of
it
is
you
have
to
live
in
these
areas
in
order
to
these
drainage
districts
to
be
on
that
board
or
you
you
can't
be
from
here
and
go
out
there,
you
have
to
own
property
or
live
there,
so
we
put
it
on
facebook,
we're
putting
it
on
our
website,
we're
doing
everything
we
as
board
members,
it's
kind
of
your
job
to
go
back
into
your
community.
A
If
you
live
in
these
areas
and
say,
do
you
want
to
serve
but
most
of
the
time
the
people
that
are
on
these
drainage
districts
we're
just
waiting
on
their
form
to
get
back?
It's
a
formality
to
announce
it,
and
if
there
is
competition
then
we
bring
that
in
here
as
a
recommendation
to
the
to
the
executive
committee.
So
I
would
fi
I
chuckled,
but
it's
really
disappointing
to
hear
those
comments.
A
So
the
moving
on
under
new
business,
the
approval
of
the
redistricting
committee
me
come.
Excuse
me,
committee
minutes
from
september
15th
and
approval
of
the
committee
of
the
whole
minutes
from
august
16th.
Is
there
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
mr
ekkov
in
a
second
with
miss
polk,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye.
A
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries.
Is
there
any
old
business
for
the
committee?
M
All
right,
kenky
county
again,
is
changing
and
so
much
kanke
county
government.
That's
why
we
should
pass
a
redistricting
map
to
advance
a
more
fair
and
equitable
kenki
county
and
allow
people,
voices
and
views
to
be
reflected
by
those
who
represent
them.
The
map
we
passed
on
october
12
showed
only
percentages,
not
the
boundary
changes.
This
map
stands
in
stark
contrast
to
the
fundamental
integrity
of
cross-gender
across
culture
across
ethnic
equality
and
the
fundamental
principles
of
justice.
We
need
a
fair
and
equitable
representation
for
minorities
that
serve
on
this
board.
M
The
decision
you
make
this
morning
will
either
be
troubling
or
transformative.
Dr
king
says
the
injustice
anywhere
is
a
threat
to
justice
everywhere.
As
a
minority,
I
take
personal
armors
against
non-minorities,
acting
as
trustees
for
magno
for
minorities
controlled
districts.
My
position
is
to
ossify
disparity
treatment
and
outright
injustice.
M
Sorry,
the
way
you
stated
it
yeah,
it's
it's
the
motion
of
reconsideration,
so
it's
the
most
the
motion
to
reconsider
the
motion
that
we
approved
at
the
of
adopting
the
redistricting
map
at
the
october
12th
county
board
meeting.
A
Yeah,
those
motions
need
to
happen
in
the
same
meeting,
so
the
motion,
as
I
feel,
is
out
of
order
to
start
with
the
question
is:
does
the
board
want
to
continue
and
go
ahead
and
vote?
Whether
you
want
to
reconsider
this
or
not?
And
I
think
it's
probably
in
the
best
interest
of
us
to
step
outside
of
robert's
rules
of
order,
because
we
can't
suspend
the
rules
and
we
can
operate
outside
of
robert's
rules
of
order?
That
motion
should
have
happened
when
you
first
voted
for
this
last
month,
mr
snipes.
M
A
And
I'm
leaning
towards
saying
recommending
that
we
do
have
the
re-vote.
We
all
know
it's
going
to
have
the
same
outcome.
This
was
an
open
and
fair
process
from
the
very
beginning.
Now
I'm
not
the
only
one
who
has
said
this:
there
were
three
political
parties,
part
of
the
process.
There
were
maps
all
over
this
room
for
months
and
if
you
didn't
involve
yourself
in
the
process,
that
is
not
there's
no
isms
or
risks
associated
with
any
of
that.
It's
just
laziness.
A
W
So
the
motion-
emotions
interfere.
I
mean
the
motion
to.
A
First
of
all,
he's
made
the
motion
to
suspend
the
rules.
Is
there
a
second
then
I'll
get
to
you,
mr
lear,.
W
H
A
A
Mr
collins,
is
that
your
second
to
suspend
the
rules?
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
of
suspending
the
rules,
so
we
can
have
a
motion
to
reconsider,
say
I
I
those
opposed
same
sign
all
right
noted
for
the
record.
The
eyes
take
it.
So,
mr
snipes,
do
you
have
a
motion?
Yes,.
M
A
Is
the
second
now
is
their
comment
on
the
motion
to
reconsider
it's,
not
a
new
map,
it's
a
motion
that
we
have
to
go
back
and
do
another
map
before
the
17th.
I
believe
of
this
month
is
when
the
state
law
says
we
have
to
have
it
done
and
by
the
way
this
is
the
second
map
we
have
done.
The
second
one
didn't
change
very
much
from
the
first
one
over
what
five
months
ago.
So
just
want
to
mention
that
mr
let's
go
with
mr
featherling
first
okay,
mr.
X
Chairman
we
had
several
meetings
over
a
month
or
two's
time.
The
maps
were
there.
I
was
involved
with
pga
with
gis
and
they
were
making
all
the
maps
and
we
had
all
different
variations.
Everything
was
put
in
front
of
us.
Straightforward
was
open,
meetings
were
open
to
the
public,
they
were
no
public
was
notified.
X
I
really
feel
as
though
coming
after
something
like
this
is
at
a
later
date
is,
doesn't
speak
for
the
process
of
what
we
did
a
few
months
back.
They
kept
moving
the
goal
post
on
the
date,
and
then
we
didn't
have
the
census.
Then
we
got
the
census
and
you
made
a
little
postage
stamp
type
changes
in
what
was
going
on
there
really
wasn't
anything
going
on
population
is
perfectly
divided
up,
not
perfectly,
but
within
a
few
people
divided
up
is
the
way
it
was
before.
X
So
we
didn't
have
the
census
at
the
time,
but
we
we
did
for
the
second
map.
It
was
a
while
back.
So
I
really
think
that
it's
it's
not
proper
to
come
back
and
want
to
make
a
change.
When
you
know
opportunity
was
there,
people
came
in,
we
discussed
them
before
the
meetings.
People
don't
get
there
before
the
meetings
and
discuss
them
with
people.
We
had
a
chance
to
walk
around
and
point
out
the
differences
with
the
people
that
weren't
involved
with
the
meetings
who
couldn't
be
there.
X
X
A
You
any
other,
mr
ekkov,
thank
you.
S
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
agree
with
what
mr
felling
said
and
yourself
it's
been
an
open
process.
I
heard
during
public
comment.
There
was
never
any
poster
boards
that
the
public
was
not
invited
during
this
process.
The
public
was
a
part
of
the
process.
The
one
person
that
spoke
during
public
comment
actually
submitted
a
map
that
was
illegal
because
the
percentages
were
way
off.
I
was
not
on
the
redistricting
committee.
I
watched
every
committee
meeting
you
can
you
do
that
on
youtube?
S
You
can
go
ahead
and
see
everything,
that's
been
transparent
throughout
this
whole
process
and
the
stuff
that
I
saw
in
the
newspaper
saying
that
this
was
not
fair.
They
were
going
after
minority
and
people
of
color.
I
don't
see
that
mr
snipes
went
ahead
and
made
the
comment
in
the
newspaper
and
even
during
a
meeting
exactly
mr
snipes
made
a
comment
that
oh
he
was
voting
on
percentages.
We
all
see
the
boundaries
right
here.
S
V
I've
heard
the
critics
of
the
map
say
that
they're
not
interested
in
protecting
incumbents,
but
as
I
listen
to
their
comments,
it
appears
that's
exactly
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
protect
incumbents,
there's
nothing
in
this
map
that
would
prevent
any
group
or
even
any
protected
class
by
law
from
having
a
candidate
run
in
the
districts
that
have
been
established,
districts
that
meet
the
requirements
of
both
the
state
and
in
terms
of
any
civil
rights
legislation
at
the
federal
level.
So
I
support
the
existing
map.
A
I
You
know
my
my
background
is
human
resource
and
I
also
was
the
manager
of
investigations
with
the
illinois
department
of
human
services,
and
I
have
a
couple
several
questions.
I'd
like
to
pose
to
the
body.
Mr
siroi
is
an
accurate
statement
that
you
were
the
chairman
of
the
redistricting
committee
and
vice
chair.
Peyton
was
the
vice
chair.
I
I
Mr
mr
payton
was
the
vice
chair.
I
was
just
a
member
of
the
committee
yeah
right.
Okay,
is
it
an
accurate
statement
and
pardon
me,
you
know
from
making
that
that
oversight
with
respect
to
specificity,
how
many
meetings
were
there
held
on
on
this
particular
committee.
E
I
That's
an
accurate
statement
and
how
many
times
was
states
attorney
row
at
those
meetings.
H
I
Is
it
a
accurate
statement
that
that
mr
rowe
made
a
comment
with
respect
to
any
violations
of
the
civil
rights
act
or
the
matter
that
that
speaks
to
gerrymandering
and
and
cutting
down
the
number
of
minorities
and
all
that
stuff?
That's
been
alleged.
H
I
With
with
respect
to
any
scintilla
of
evidence
that
the
process
process
was
in
air
in
any
kind
of
violations,
have
we
made
any
mistakes
whatsoever
regarding
that
process?.
H
No,
I
I
think
the
process
it
was
vetted,
it
was
extensive,
the
maps
you
know
we're
made
available.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
there's
anything
that
you
can
point
to
in
that
process
or
in
the
outcome.
That
would
nullify
the
map.
A
Yeah,
I
would
say
the
the
word
collusion.
I
think
it
was
participation
between
three
political
parties
to
have
an
open
and
fair
process
that
was
live
recorded.
It
could
have
been
viewed
by
any
board
member
where
we
zoomed
in
on
the
maps.
I
sat
upstairs
with
a
lot
of
board
members
in
here
that
wanted
to
take
a
look
at
their
area
and
everybody
had
that
opportunity.
A
Mr
kirkstra
asked:
can
we
see
the
street
level
we
made
delbert
available
to
go,
everybody
could
have
went
down
there.
He
asked
in
the
meeting
and
nobody
went
down
to
see
delbert
about
looking
at
their
their
district
air
quotes
because
it's
not
theirs.
It's
the
people
that
live
there.
So
I
don't
know
what
more
we
could
have
done,
except
scream
from
the
top
of
the
building.
Q
As
a
person
who
consistently
challenges
and
questions
the
role
and
motives
of
government
at
all
levels,
I
sat
on
this
redistricting
committee
and
I
was
I
was
really
pleased
and
given
hope
and
shocked
at
how
open
and
willing
to
explain
the
process,
not
only
with
the
way
census,
tracts,
work
and
the
way
the
program
works,
to
set
up
these
districts
and
to
realize
what
goes
with
the
thought
process
that
goes
into
it,
and
also
the
comparisons.
Q
What
a
beautiful
crisp
clean,
honest
map,
I
feel
like
we
propose
and
to
not,
like
you,
said,
only
to
to
go
through
the
process
twice
and
and
all
agree
that
we
were
working
together
as
three
separate
political
parties
that
agreed
that
we
were
being
fair
and
honest
and
forthcoming
with
each
other.
I
think
this
is
completely
inappropriate
as
well.
A
M
Point
to
the
manhole
basically
gave
us
or
whatever,
and
I
had
to
look
at
it
again
because
I
wanted
to
make
sure.
Can
you
tell
me
what
street
that
is?
M
Okay,
so
what
is
that
stream?
What
I'm
saying
is
there
are
no
streets.
All
it
says
is
percentages,
percentages,
change,
map,
one
map,
two
map,
three,
four,
five,
six
and
seven
all
says
the
same
thing.
If
I
was
support
here,
would
I
know
what
street
that
was
up
in
here?
No,
I
wouldn't
so.
I
wouldn't
know
how
you
would
withdraw
the
map.
That's
a
question
that
one
question
I
would
have
is
did
any
of
these
meetings
occur
at
night
because
a
lot
of
people
work
in
the
daytime.
M
So
how
many
meetings
did
you
have
at
night
on
this
redistricting
committee
to
really
involve
the
county?
That's
my
first
question
and
my
second
will
follow
up.
Anybody
have
an
answer
to
that.
Did
we
have
any
meetings
at
night
to
involve
people
that
did
not
work?
You
know,
I
think
so.
So,
therefore,
for
it
to
be
a
beautiful
process,
I
would
be
objected
to
it.
The
map
is
not.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
how
you
draw
a
map.
M
I
have
a
problem
when
your
map
is
drawn
and
it
draws
out
minorities
white
women
is
the
first
minority
used
to
be
blacks.
Was
the
second,
but
now
it's
hispanic.
Third
is
blacks.
So
therefore
the
voters
right
act,
supports
and
encourages
and
enforce
the
fact
that
minority
districts
should
be
empowered
and
preserved
doesn't
make
a
difference
who
lives
there.
Who's
going
to
run.
Anybody
can
run
against
anyone
in
any
particular
district,
but
the
18th
district,
how
they
come
all
the
way
from
clark
park
up
to
maple
street
and
cutting
my
black
and
out
amazes
me.
M
The
thing
is:
we're
not
saying
that
we
are
in
opposition
to
a
map
being
drawn,
we're
saying
that
it
should
not
eliminate
minority
districts,
and
in
this
case
it
has
a
potential
to
do
two,
and
so
for
that
particular
reason,
and
that
reason
alone,
I
don't
think
it
was
automatically
fair.
You
tr
is
fundamentally
unfair
when
you
say
that
people
have
to
come
in
the
daytime.
M
M
You
could
you
don't
have
a
voice
so
for
those
individuals,
white
women,
black
women,
black
men,
also
union
members
who
again
are
working
people,
because
I'm
one
and
I'm
the
president
of
the
union
and
those
individuals
that
are
disenfranchised
from
what
we
consider
to
be
government.
This
is
what
this
particular
fight
is
about,
and
so,
therefore
you
might
see
it
to
be
fundamentally
unfair.
M
I
didn't
really
hear
a
lot
of
women
jump
up
and
say
hallelujah.
Thank
you.
This
is
the
best
map
we
could
have
and
I
support
knocking
out
minority
women
or
knocking
out
minority
men
or
knocking
out
the
minority
as
far
as
the
party's
concerned.
Even
if
we
move
the
party,
it
is
fundamentally
unfair
to
women
and
black
men,
black
women
white
women
period.
Then
why
did
you
vote
for
it?
No
because
we
looked
at
the
percentages.
So
when
I
looked
at
percentages
I
thought
and
then
you
just
voted
for
it.
M
So
my
thing
is
that
when
we
voted
we
looked
at
the
percentages.
I
would
have
not
voted
to
knock
me
out
of
a
district
or
combine
a
district.
I
represent
district
18,
whoever
they
put
in
district
18.
I
don't
care,
but
I
protect
and
I
represent
district
18.,
I'm
sure
the
other
minorities
or
the
minority
parties
do,
which
would
say
the
same,
and
so
this
I
believe,
is
fundamentally
unfair
and
not
one.
M
A
All
right,
mr.
R
R
R
R
A
The
the
looking
for
more
comments,
I'm
sorry,
miss
bryant.
Please.
A
Everybody's
up
everybody's
up
for
election,
mr
fairfield.
A
It
was,
it
was
unanimous,
I
believe,
but
the
first
time
there
was
one
dissenting
vote.
Okay,
so
the
first
map
that
we
did,
I
think
there
was
one
dissenting
vote
and
then
the
second
map
there.
It
was
unanimous.
O
A
Chair,
oh
I'm
sorry!
Yes,
mr
featherling,
second
time.
X
Sorry,
all
those
meetings
were
broadcast
on
youtube,
available,
24
7
a
day
and
then
our
pack
up
for
the
board
meetings.
You
also
have
the
maps
in
there
for
the
packets
that
were
available
on
email
to
anybody
available
before
any
of
those
meetings
that
we
voted
on
that.
So
I
I
I'm
like
todd,
I
don't
really
understand
where
it's
coming
from.
I
really
don't
so
I'd
like
to
move
on
I'd
like
do.
We
have
a
motion
to.
A
Not
approve
it,
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
reconsider,
which
means
nullify
the
past
vote
that
was
unanimous
to
approve.
X
D
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
appreciate
they
called
on
me.
I
do
question
district
number
five.
It
was
said
that
this
was
a
clean
map
and
that
district
five
goes
from
the
little
county
line.
All
the
way
to
aroma
park
over
14
miles
long
includes
people
from
mantino,
bradley,
kankakee
and
aroma
park.
I
don't
think
that's
very
clean.
I
did
vote
against
the
map
the
first
time
and
I
just
feel
that
I
do
question
how
only
certain
people
were
affected
disproportionately.
D
I
don't
think
that
was
visible
until
people
other
people.
I
knew
I
was
affected,
but
I
knew
other
people
I
did
not
know.
Other
people
were
affected.
So
that's
my
comments.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
mr
lear.
V
A
It's
a
second,
and
this
motion
is
not
debatable,
so
we're
it
just
has
to
be.
If
anybody
objects
to
ending
debate
and
voting
on
this,
could
you
please
say
now
that
you
want
to
have
something
else
to
say.
I.
E
H
That
that's
because,
at
the
end
of
day
and
the
end
of
the
day,
this
is
not
about
protecting
the
incumbent
in
that
district.
I
think
you
know
there's
just
so
much
that's
been
thrown
out
today.
There's
there's
just
you
know
and
baseless
allegations
being
thrown
around
the
room.
I
can
see
it's
getting
personal
on
both
sides
of
this
issue
and
mr
snipes,
you
and
I
have
always
been
able
to
disagree
without
being
disagreeable,
and
I
appreciate
that
about
you.
H
So
I
hope
that
maintains
today,
because
I
I
just
simply
disagree
with
your
assessment
and
some
of
the
people
from
public
comment
today.
This
is
not
about
who
is
in
that
district.
Currently,
as
the
county
board
representative,
it
is
about
the
residents
of
those
districts
so,
for
instance,
to
say
that
miss
bryant's,
the
residents
in
miss
bryant's
district,
have
been
disenfranchised
from
having.
H
I
think
the
public
comment
was
a
white
female
represent
them
is
ludicrous,
because
there
are
still
many
white
women
within
that
district.
It
may
just
not
be
miss
bryant
this
time
and
she
has
an
opponent
and
I
believe,
mr
kirkstra,
your
districts
were
combined.
If
I'm
not
mistaken.
Mr
kirkster
and
the
white
female
incumbent,
miss
bryant,
voted
for
the
map
that
combined
their
districts
and
at
the
at
that
meeting
when
the
map
was
approved.
H
Mr
snipes,
I
specifically
remember
you
saying
that
miss
peter's
district
was
combined
with
miss
parker's
district.
If
I'm
correct-
and
you
said
you
thought
that
was
unfortunate,
because
they're
two
strong
board
members,
two
women-
and
I
remember
cringing
when
you
were
saying
that
solely
because
the
map
process
is
not
about
the
incumbent,
but
it
told
me
that
you
knew
that
those
ma
those
districts
had
been
combined
and
you
still
voted
for
that
map.
H
Even
though
there
were
two
white
women,
which
is
what
you
complain
of
today
and
when
I
look
at
this
map,
I
may
not
be
able
to
tell
you
every
little
street
inside,
but
is
there
anybody
that
can
honestly
look
at
this
and
not
tell
me
what
district
you
live
in
I
mean
you
can
see
the
major
barriers.
Those
are
listed,
45
52,
50,
17,
115
113,
you
can
see
where
57
is.
Everyone
knew
where
they
lived
in
this
map.
H
H
None
of
that
changed
what
district
each
member
on
this
current
board
was
in
is
consistent
still
today
from
the
first
map
to
the
second
map,
and
it's
only
a
problem
for
you.
If
you
are
worried
about
protecting
the
incumbent
in
that
district,
when
you
talk
about
well,
why
were
some
districts
changed
and
others
were
not?
H
You
diminish
the
ability
of
a
minority
to
get
elected
from
a
majority
minority
district,
and
then
you
run
a
file
of
the
voting
rights
act.
Then
your
map
becomes
illegal,
so
some
things
were
just
a
necessity.
One
of
the
other
things.
Why
were
the
districts
in
the
city
of
kankakee,
but
maybe
not
the
rural
communities
impacted
as
much
by
map
amendments
to
the
boundaries,
the
population,
the
census
turnout
was
abysmal
in
the
city
of
kankakee.
H
H
H
The
the
result,
but
we
haven't
eliminated
a
district
right.
You
are
in
one
district
and
there's
a
new
district
created,
which
I
don't
think
there's
any
incumbent
in.
Is
that
correct
correct?
So
so
what
you're?
What
you
would
have
to
be
saying
is
that
that
new
district,
that
there
is
no
possibility
of
an
african-american
or
perhaps
even
a
hispanic,
which
is
very
likely
because
of
the
changing
demographics
in
the
city
of
kankakee,
that
there
is
no
option
for
one
of
them
to
be
elected
in
that
newly
created
district.
H
H
H
It's
disingenuous
because,
let
me
tell
you,
I
was
in
those
rooms
10
years
ago
when
they
were
talking
about
them
from
a
partisan
standpoint
at
the
time
and
they
were
unhappy
as
hell
with
those
maps
back
then
there
were
many
considerations
to
review
them
and
challenge
those
maps.
None
of
them
ultimately
came
to
fruition,
but
to
act
like
they
were
so
happy
with
those
maps,
and
none
of
these
things
were
issues
back
then
it's
simply
that's
just
simply
not
true.
H
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
how
to
vote
on
this
motion
to
reconsider
if
you
do
move
to
reconsider
and
the
current
this,
the
second
map
that
was
approved
unanimously,
if
that
map
is
thereby
rescinded,
which
would
be
the
effect
of
a
motion
to
reconsider,
there's
a
very
short
window
of
time
where
you've
got
to
get
a
map,
or
else
that
map
is
going
to
be
drawn
by
a
committee
that
the
county
clerk
oversees,
not
that
we
wouldn't
trust
you
dan,
but
but
that
is
that
is,
quite
frankly,
that's
less
of
an
open
process.
H
It's
less
of
a
democratic
process,
not
to
go
down
that
road
and
that's
why
the
state
builds
that
into
the
statute
as
a
kind
of
the
final
step.
If
a
board
can't
can't
get
their
house
in
order.
I
don't
believe
that
this
map
violates
the
law.
H
I
think
that
the
map
accounts
for
population
shifts,
while
still
preserving
the
demographics
of
the
board.
E
May
I
follow
up
yes,
sir.
Mr
s,
thank
you
and
thanks
jim
also.
The
committee
came
to
the
point
where
can't
lost
3
000
people,
that
is
a
district.
The
committee
decided
to
keep
kankakee
intact.
Instead
of
letting
them
lose
a
district
which
would
have
made
the
mapping
a
lot
easier.
We
decided
to
keep
that
other
district
in
kankakee.
E
M
Again,
I
hear
what
you're
saying
and
I
think
the
point
keeps
being
invaded
you're
talking
about
a
beautiful
map,
you're
talking
about
protecting
a
person.
I
am
not
talking
about
protecting
a
person,
you
didn't
it
wasn't
a
a
person
that
we
basically
vote
on.
It
was
the
percentages.
M
When
we
looked
at
those
particular
maps,
you
didn't
see
where
boundaries
and
things
were
changed,
we're
not
talking
about.
I
got
a
hispanic
and
I
got
a
black
in
my
district.
I
applaud
you
we're
talking
about
minority
districts
that
have
been
one
or
whatever
they
they.
The
last
two
had
not
had
a
minority
in
it.
M
So
therefore,
two
women,
a
white
woman
and
a
black
woman,
one,
not
the
person,
but
who
want
from
the
district
after
all
of
these
centuries
that
we've
had
in
kankakee
county
as
they
begin
to
uprise
we're
saying
protecting
the
rights
of
minorities,
not
the
person
but
the
minority
district.
Now
you
I,
I
applaud
you
when
you
say
you
want
to
save
a
district
in
kangaki,
but
you
voted
for
28.
bought
me.
So
you
still
gonna
have
28
board
members.
M
The
issue
was
that
the
minority
districts
on
the
east
side
were
chomped
up,
but
what
happened
to
the
other
side
of
kankakee
all
of
the
white
republican
representatives?
We
could
not
look
to
draw
a
map
over
in
that
area.
Downsize
come
on
it's
a
little
bit
better
than
that.
Yes,
we
will
be
we.
We
disagree
on
a
lot
of
things,
but
you
do
know
that
we
argue
and
their
times
you
have
given
your
position
on
something
and
you've
conceded
snipes.
M
M
What
I'm
saying
is
that
it's
the
minority,
not
the
person,
we
saw
the
percentages,
not
the
boundary
lines
changed
that
was
not
put
to
us
and
if
somebody
said
that
they
saw
the
boundary
lines
they
probably
was
on
the
redistricting
committee.
To
make
it
fundamentally
fair,
I
would
have
opened
it
up
to
the
evenings.
So
that
people
could
come
in,
that's
why
I
propose
I'm
a
proponent
of
county
board
at
least
twice
a
year
or
better
have
evening
meetings,
because
people
are
at
work,
can't
look
at
a
math
at
work,
they'll
fire
you.
M
So
the
thing
is
I'm
saying
this
before
fundamentally
fair
of
protecting
the
minority
district.
That
would
want
war
one.
I
don't
care
if
desmond
two
two
run
or
queen
elizabeth
run
up
in
it.
It
still
was
a
minority
finally
realized
elected
district
and
it's
those
districts
that
are
the
minority
of
the
minority
of
the
majority.
Where.
M
M
To
the
redistricting
they
said
they
were
setting
the
rules
and
if
you
do
that,
what
if
I
don't
go
to
all
the
committee
meetings
at
night
and
all
the
different
ones,
I
trust
them.
That's
why
we
have
committees,
so
you
trust
them
to
do
the
right
thing
and
then,
when
they
don't
that's
when
we
begin
to
say,
hey
dude,
let's
look
at.
M
Them
you
said
these
are
percentage
changes
that
finally
came
in
from
the
census,
but
the
boundaries
didn't
that
just
because
you
can
have
a
percentage
change
and
then,
when
you're
going
to
do
the
boundaries,
that's
what
we
need
to
look
at
and
if
anybody
here
says
that
they
saw
their
bounties
with
the
streets,
I
have
never
even
10
years
ago
they
had
the
streets.
Where
you
can
look.
M
When
I
went
you
said,
go
to
deborah,
I
went
to
delbert
deborah
said
you
got
to
go
to
the
the
county
clerk
to
get
the
map,
and
so
he
says
I
went
down
there.
I
got
the
map,
I
saw
it
and
it
was
the
same
thing
I
saw
up
here.
It
was
percentages.
It
did
not
show
us
where
boundaries
were
when
you're
changing
boundaries.
M
You
incorporating
individuals
in
there's
some
other
things
that
are
being
involved
here,
that
we
were
not
made
privy
of,
and
even
when
I
looked
at
the
map
on
page
88,
it's
the
same
thing
I
saw
here
and
I
asked
everybody
in
the
community.
Can
you
tell
me
where
the
districts
are
and
it
was
a
resounding?
No,
that's
what
we're
arguing
and
you
voted
for.
A
Is
there
a
point
of
order?
That's
five
minutes.
Okay,
so
then
per
county
board
rules.
Five
minutes
are
up
second
time.
We
have
somebody
want
to
call
the
question,
but
all
right,
then,
second,
okay,
so
is
there?
If
do
we
have
to
vote
on
that
or
is
there
well
someone.
P
What
I
hear
them
saying
is.
I
hear
both
sides.
P
I
hear
the
persons
on
the
committee
did
a
their
best
work
and
they
did
their
best
and
that's
all
any
of
us
can
do
is
do
our
best
and
they
did
a
good
job
and
I
understand
the
feelings
of
not
seeing
enough
females
or
people
of
color
as
a
member
of
illinois
democratic
women
who,
as
they
have
repeatedly
said,
is
an
organization
that
promotes
women
participating
in
politics.
P
P
We
will
going
forward.
I
guess
if
we
want
to
see
that
on
the
map
we
will
have
to
have
people
run
and
as
a
life
member
of
naacp.
I
want
people
of
color
in
our
room
too.
I
want
everybody's
voice
heard
and
thank
you
robert.
I
think
you
know
for
saying
these
things,
but
it's
just
I
see
that
is
where
the
sore
spot
is
is
where
they
want.
We
want
more
representation,
and
the
map
just
happens
to
be
a
place
where
this
gets
vented
at.
P
A
A
H
A
E
D
A
Fails
moving
on
is
there
any
other
old
business.
A
Moving
on
now
this
is
informational.
I
had
asked
and
talked
with
anita
when
I
was
out
last
week
regarding
mandates
and
things
like
that,
osha
regulations,
so
if
somebody
has
to
go,
there's
nothing
to
vote
on,
but
I
hope
you
stick
around.
I
know
this
has
been
a
long
meeting
and
she's
prepared
some
things
here,
but
I
understand
this
is
long
and
some
people
may
have
things
to
get
to,
but
we're
not
going
to
be
voting
on
anything
per
se.
Y
Y
There
is
currently,
as
you
probably
read,
a
stay
on
the
implementation
of
the
rule
out
of
the
united
states.
Fifth
circuit
court
of
appeals.
Illinois
is
not
a
party
to
the
litigation,
so
there
is
an
argument
that
the
stay
only
applies
to
those
states
that
are
a
party
to
it,
regardless,
as
a
government
entity
in
the
state
of
illinois,
kankakee
county
is
subject
to
illinois.
Osha
regulations,
rather
than
the
federal
osha
federal
osha,
from
which
this
mandate
has
occurred.
Y
There's
a
strong
possibility
that
either
a
similar,
if
not
identical,
rule,
will
be
issued
from
illinois,
osha
in
a
relatively
short
period
of
time
and
the
webinar
I
was
on
on
friday,
indicated
probably
30
days
or
so
so
we'll
be
waiting
for.
That
essential
aspects
of
the
rule
include
the
following
number:
one
that
we
must
have
a
written
mandatory
vaccine
policy
or
a
policy
requiring
cova
testing
and
mass
for
unvaccinated
employees.
Y
Y
Employees
must
be
tested
at
least
once
every
seven
days
and
provide
documented
test
results.
Employers
must
maintain
records
of
each
employee's
vaccination
status
and
test
results
and
of
each
employee's.
Vaccination
says
and
test
results
as
confidential
medical
records
and
must
not
be
disclosed
unless
required
or
authorized
by
either
osha
or
federal
law.
Y
All
employees
not
vaccinated,
must
wear
a
mask.
Employer
must
require
each
employee
to
promptly
notify
the
employer,
if
they're
positive
for
covid
and
must
isolate
or
remove
them
from
the
workplace.
Y
Y
If
what
illinois
osha
distributes
is
similar
to
this
federal
rule,
it'll
be
onerous
it'll,
be
onerous
to
try
and
track
every
single
employee's
vaccination
status
as
it
occurs,
track
what
they
provide.
Keep
keep
a
copy
of
that
record
track
every
single
employee's
testing
every
week.
That's
unvaccinated!
Y
It
is
onerous
at
best,
so
we
will
keep
track
of
it.
I'm
sure
I'll
be
speaking
regularly
with
the
state's
attorney's
office
as
this
moves
forward,
but
that
is
where
we're
at
right
now.
A
So
onerous
equals
expensive
for
us.
I
will
probably
require-
and
I
believe
it's
a
appropriate
use
of
arpa
funds
to
to
do
all
of
this
stuff,
but
it
will.
How
much
is
that
going
to
drain
that?
We
just
don't
know
at
this
point,
because
we're
going
to
need
another
person
to
administer
this
there's
no
way
that
we
can
do
this
with
an
hr
staff
of
one,
that's
also
our
county
administrator.
A
A
Sorry,
two
hr
employees
get
something
thrown
at
me
here,
but
I
I
think
you
understand
it
and
it's
it's
it's
there's
it's
just
let's,
please
don't
get
into
a
big
fist
table
pounding
political
discussion
now
because
we
just
don't
know
what
it
is.
Yet
we
wanted
you
to
have
the
information
in
front
of
you.
A
So
if
people
ask
you,
this
is
kind
of
where
things
are
at
right
now,
but
know
that
the
county
is
different
than
the
businesses
in
the
community,
their
federal
osha,
where
state
and
state
hasn't
promulgated
those
rules
yet
but
know
that
I've
already
looked
into
testing
options,
maybe
people
that
can
come
to
our
buildings
to
help
reduce
that
kind
of
stuff.
I
did
that
when
this
first
came
out
what
a
month
and
a
half
ago
when
they
started
talking
about
this,
the
president,
so
anyway,
questions
to
start
with
mr
hunter.
E
A
Thank
you.
I've
had
feedback
for
organized
labor.
They
don't
like
having
all
this
shoved
on
their
throat
without
it
being
negotiated,
collectively,
bargained
and,
and
I
people
that
say
that
I'm
anti-union
they
bargain
for
those
rights
and
they
should
be
able
to
collectively
bargain
vaccination
status
seems
like
this
is
a
way
around
unions,
in
my
opinion,
but
that's
just
mine
in
a
lot
of
union
people's
opinion,
but
I'm
anti-union.
I
forgot
so
anybody
any
other
questions.
Mr
snipes.
M
I
am
a
I'm
kind
of
in
betwixt
in
between
only
in
this
regard.
M
I,
the
school
district,
is
already
in
the
process
of
doing
this,
and
so
I
know
the
tedious
task
or
whatever,
and
basically
he
asks
for
your
vaccination
card
or
you
have
to
be
tested
at
least
once
a
week
and
they
they
have
a
health
department
and
whatever
or
you
have
to
bring
it
from
someone
that
is
currently
a
health.
That's
certified
health,
they
don't
do
no
home
testing
and
an
individual.
I
was
with
the
the
the
doctor
in
the
state
of
illinois.
That's
out
there.
M
We
had
the
opportunities
here
at
the
nw
acp
meeting
and
asked
some
questions
whether
my
grave,
my
greatest
concern
was
many
of
the
individuals
that
says
that
if
they
can't
covet
the
they
have
to
use
their
sick
time
now,
because
they
don't
pay
for
the
10
days.
But
I
see
something
is
now
in
springfield
and
they
just
passed
the
governor,
I
mean
not
the
governor,
but
the
the
legislation
to
the
governor's
desk.
What
I'm?
M
What
I
probably
need
to
know
is:
even
if
we
did
the
testing,
I
know
it's
going
to
be
labor's.
Someone
says
leverage.
If
you
have
a
vaccination
card,
you
just
present
it
you
don't
have
to,
but
they
still,
we
still
wear
a
mask
if
we
are
in
because
I'm
vaccinated,
but
if
I'm
in
three
feet
of
students
and
all
of
that-
and
we
have
1500
students
and
been
going
strong
since
then.
M
So
what
I
do
is
I
wear
a
mask
as
a
as
a
way
of
protection
if
we're
going
to
set
up-
and
we
know
that
this
is
coming-
oh,
we
know
this
is
coming.
Are
we
making
any
type
of
provisions
to
have
a
file
cabinet
for
those
that
are
tested?
I
mean
that's
already
got
the
vaccination
card,
so
the
only
ones
that
we
then
we
have
to
focus
on
are
those
that
are
being
tested
and
then
that
would
have
to
be
every
week
or
two
weeks
or
whatever.
A
Next
year,
so
yeah,
that's
it
for
now.
Is
there
any
other
questions
about
this
more
to
come?
I
guess
we
don't
there's
no
definitive
answers,
it's
just
the
lay
of
the
land
as
it
stands
now.
Mr
collins.
Q
I'd
just
like
to
address
the
basic
tenets
of
our
country,
which,
if
you
look
at
the
bill
of
rights,
the
tenth
amendment
delegates
that
any
powers
not
clearly
outlined
in
the
constitution
are
given
to
to
be
issued
by
the
state
and
determined
by
the
state,
and
one
of
those
is
sovereignty
from
the
state
and
the
definite
I
mean
sovereignty
is
the
inherent
and
independent
right
to
do
all
that
is
necessary
to
govern
oneself.
Q
Q
Maybe
it
sounds
confusing
or
it
sounds
hyperbolic
or
it
sounds
like
I'm
trying
to
make
a
big
deal
out
of
something,
but
the
most
basic
human
rights
that
we
have
are
that
we
can
control
what
goes
into
our
own
bodies
and
sovereignty
is
one
of
the
most
core
tenets
of
liberty,
of
freedom
of
our
country,
of
our
constitution
and
our
way
of
life,
and
I
would
really
encoura
encourage
this
board
to
not
adhere
to
any
sort
of
osha
recommendations
or
any
other
recommendation,
no
matter
how
it's
voted
on
by
anybody.
Q
If
a
hundred
people
vote
that
you
don't
have
sovereignty
of
your
own
body,
that
does
not
make
it
so,
and
I
would
encourage
this
board
to
challenge
any.
I
mean
look
at
how
this
is
going
to
affect
us
from
the
financial
standpoint.
Q
If
we
do
have
to
track
all
of
these
issues-
and
we
do
have
to
individually
submit
for
testing
all
of
the
county
employees-
we're
not
just
talking
about
people
in
this
room,
it
would
be
a
massive
undertaking
and
we
know
where
this
is
going,
because
we've
seen
where
it's
gone
in
other
parts
of
the
country,
I
would
just
encourage
people
to
educate
yourself
on
what
personal
liberty
and
individual
freedom
is.
The
tenth
amendment
center.com
is
a
fantastic
resource
for
explaining
your
rights
and
sovereignty
from
the
state.