►
From YouTube: Executive Committee Meeting 5/22/2018
Description
Executive Committee Meeting 5/22/2018 9:00 AM
A
B
B
A
You
I
have
no
public
comment.
Is
there
any
public
comment
today
have
no
slips.
Anybody
who'd
like
to
speak
all
righty,
then
seeing
none
moving
on
to
the
presentations
have
known
today.
Approval
of
the
minutes,
March
27,
2018
and
April
24th
2018
motion
to
approve
mr.
Bern.
Second,
mr.
Sirois,
all
those
in
favor.
Those
opposed
motion
carries
now
I'd
like
to
ask
if
we
can
get
a
motion
to
amend,
so
we
can
go
right
into
the
new
intergovernmental
agreement
for
Will
County
juvenile
detention
center.
Mr.
Liu
just
motion
to
amend
the
agenda.
Mr.
A
Hess,
all
those
in
favor
those
opposed
motion
carries
all
right
if
you
could
get
that
going
for
me
figure.
This
would
be
the
most
robust
discussion
in
question
it's
by
far
on
my
time
on
the
board,
this
is
probably
the
best
financial
news
that
I
have
seen
and
I.
Don't
know
how
possibly
we
could
top
and
I'll
take
that
as
a
channel
to
see
if
we
can
do
more
as
we
go
down
the
road.
A
But
for
those
you
know,
I've
tried
to
keep
the
board
at
least
in
step
with
what's
been
going
on
the
last
year
and
a
half.
If
you
could
flip
to
the
next
slide,
we'll
go
there
now,
the
the
actual
draft
of
the
agreement
is
in
your
packet,
okay,
I've
mentioned
to
start
off
with
that.
The
will
County
Board
has
already
adopted
this.
They
have
already
passed
this
at
their
full
board
meeting
last
week,
so
this
is
now
in
our
court
to
adopt
so
I'll
go
through
the
the
details
in
the
history
a
little
bit.
A
The
original
lease
was
signed
back
in
96.
That
was
a
time
when
we
had
well
over
20,
sometimes
25
juvenile
detainees.
The
court
methodology
has
changed
quite
a
bit
since
then,
but
it
was
a
good
deal
for
both
counties
back
then
we
had
a
lot
more
census
to
take
care
of
that
was
between
the
well
PBC,
the
will
county
government
and
Hanke
county.
This
facility
was
built.
A
It
was
a
30
year
agreement,
but
only
20
of
the
years
had
financial
terms,
it's
kind
of
an
odd
type
of
arrangement
and
for
whatever
reason,
I
don't
have
any
real
history
of
why
they
did
that,
but
they
did
it
and
that
ended
in
November
30th
of
2016
right
as
I
took
the
seat
and
the
board
changed,
and
we
you
may
remember
and
I'll
to
get
into
a
little
bit.
We
got
that
phone
call
that
says:
hey
where's,
our
last
bond
payment,
that
was
a
nice
Christmas
present
that
we
got
throughout
middle
of
December.
A
So
anyway,
we
owned
25%
of
that
building
on
the
infrastructure
in
will
County
owns
75%
of
it,
but
likewise
we
have
the
liability
ownership
in
the
same
percentage.
So
anytime
a
roof
needed
to
be
done.
We
had
we
have
to
pay
for
25
percent
of
that,
even
though
there's
no
financial
arrangement
as
it
currently
stands
right
now,
that's
what
we
were
on
the
hook
for
so
then
it
didn't
again
November
30th
2016,
and
we
had
not
made
that
final
bond
payment.
You
were
as
I
just
mentioned,
so
we
were
kind
of
in
a
bind.
A
We
had
to
figure
out
where
that
was
gonna
come
from.
They
ended
up
taking
that
payment,
as
you
remember
out
of
the
OEM,
the
maintenance
fund,
that
was
up
there
and
they
made
that
final
payment,
which
satisfied
all
of
our
the
bond.
So
again,
the
bond
is
satisfied,
so
there's
nothing
hanging
out
there
as
far
as
what
we
owe
as
far
as
the
bond
goes
and
flip
to
the
next
slide.
A
So
then,
at
that
point,
I
figured
you
know,
I
got
to
know
every
detail,
this
agreement,
and
so
I
started
to
go
through
it
and
I
started
to
look
at
the
historical
payments
and
the
cost
I
began
to
talk
with
Tom
Latham
who's,
the
head
of
probation
here
in
Kankakee
County,
it's
technically
his
area
to
work
with
the
chief
judge
to
make
sure
that
those
that
juvenile
detention
process
and
program
and
all
the
costs
and
everything
and
everything
that's
associated
with
that
is,
is
documented
and
it
flows
right.
That's
one
of
his
mandates.
A
So
we
started
to
look
at
that
and
we,
you
know
the
picture
became
clear,
that
this
is
not
financially
in
our
best
interest
and
I
can
get
into
those
numbers
and
those
are
available.
If
anybody
wants
to
talk
about
it,
but
on
a
typical
year
we
could
pay
like
a
twenty
ten
around
1.2
million
and
if
we
were
paying
the
going
rate
like
what
DHHS
does
with
us,
we'd
be
paying
around
four
hundred
thousand.
So
there's
this
big
gap
and
we're
paying
into
infrastructure.
A
A
We're
gonna
continue
with
that
under
the
terms
of
the
new
agreement,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
this
was
more
of
a
financial
lever
that
needed
to
be
turned
and
in
consequently
or
I
guess
also
will
County
feels
the
same
type
of
economic
pressure
up
there
they're
not
using
as
much
as
they
thought
that
they
would
as
well
so
for
both
parties.
It
was
like
wow.
This
is
costing
us
a
lot,
so
we
began
negotiations
in
February
2017
on
a
new
agreement.
We
continued
discussions
on.
A
It
should
be
into
the
future,
not
on
both
here
and
up
in
Wolfe
County
involved
in
those
were
Tom
Latham
Steve
McCarty,
our
Director
of
Finance.
The
state's
attorney,
went
up
there
with
us
at
one
point
to
have
some
discussions
Jim
row
to
make
sure
you
know
we
had
some
legal
things
covered,
so
this
just
wasn't
like
something
that
happened
over
a
weekend.
This
is
something
it's
been
a
long
process
and
figuring
out
where
the
agreement
is
and
where
we
need
to
go
so
when
I
finally
decided.
A
A
So
we
continued
through
mid-april.
On
the
negotiations
I
mean
this
has
been
fluent
up
until
a
week
before
the
will
County
Board
voted
on
this.
So
we
had
the
basic
terms
and
everything
agreed
upon
and
again
was
approved
on
5:17
the
negotiating
team,
as
I
mentioned,
were
the
the
people
and
a
si
Graham
Quinn
he
drafted
the
IGA
did
was
a
elegant
document
in
terms
of
legal
structure.
A
It
has
what
we
need,
there's
a
different
set
of
standards
that
we
have
to
be
adhere
that
have
to
be
adhere
to
when
you're
talking
about
juveniles,
and
but
we
had
to
get
our
cost
in
line.
We
needed
to
provide
long
term
stability
for
costs
and
services.
That's
both
for
will
County
and
for
us
they
want
us
to
remain
a
partner
in
the
use
of
that
facility.
A
We
had
to
realize
as
much
capital
as
pops
possible
in
a
buyout,
considering
the
finances
of
the
county,
but
in
a
fair
and
equitable
manner
with
will
County,
because
really
we
are
in
a
partnership
here.
You
know
we
just
weren't,
it
wasn't
a
grab
and
run.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
this
was
fair
for
all
parties
and
then
to
ensure
that
framework
for
continued
partnership.
A
So
here's
the
financials
I
mentioned
it
was
by
1.2
million
a
year
with
about
ten
detainees
back
in
2017.
We
had
on
the
average
of
about
twelve,
if
we're
just
paying
a
customer
we
between
but
depending
on
the
medical,
would
be
paying
between
four
and
six
hundred
thousand,
because
the
the
basic
day
rate
doesn't
include
the
medical
cost.
A
So
it's
hard
to
predict
without
going
back
and
auditing
what
every
detainee
had
done,
which
is
no
small
task,
so
so
we're
paying
for
that
infrastructure,
but
really
only
owning
the
liability,
and
so
after
the
end
of
right
before
yeah
at
4:30
2018,
we
owed
will
County
two
million
dollars
for
the
past
year
and
a
half
or
two
years,
roughly
of
of
those
fees
under
the
old
agreement.
But
there
was
no
agreement
in
place.
That's
why
we
did
not
pay
is
because
we
hadn't
agreed
on.
There
was
no
financial
structure
to
anything.
A
So
during
this
whole
negotiation
process,
they
knew
what
I
was
doing.
We
knew
what
they
were
doing.
We
just
did
not
pay
until
we
figured
out.
Maybe
it
wasn't
gonna
be
that
amount.
It
would
have
been
something
less.
Mr.
ole
talked
that
agreement
had
expired.
Is
that
correct,
yeah,
the
financial
part
right,
but
the
rest
of
it
was
still
in
place
and
that's
what
this
new
IgA
is
replacing
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
on
that.
It
was
kind
of
an
odd
situation.
There's
like
well.
A
A
2
million
will
wipe
out
that
accounts
payable,
and
it's
going
to
be
pay
out
of
that
liquidity
that
we
have
in
the
building
and
then
another
two
and
a
half
million
remains
as
a
payment
for
the
detainees
from
430
of
when
this
would
take
place
to
11:30
2022
per
the
schedule.
That's
a
big
deal
because
we
won't
have
to
pay
for
the
folks
that
we
send
up
there
out
of
until
that
is
completely
exhausted,
that
next
two
and
a
half
million
dollars.
It's
addition
by
subtraction.
C
A
Basically,
a
credit
exactly
any
overages
over
12
we're
guaranteeing
them
12,
because
that's
about
what
our
average
is
and
we
think
that's
gonna
be
consistent
without
knowing
what's
gonna
happen
in
Springfield
or
anything
else.
It's
you
can't
predict,
but
just
like
20
or
20
years
ago,
we
couldn't
predict
that
we
wouldn't
be
sending
25
people
there,
but
we
do
have
predictability
on
knowing
what
12
is
going
to
cost
us
and
then
there
we
have
a
guarantee
up
to
20
beds.
A
So
if
we
need
more
they're
gonna,
be
there,
we're
not
gonna
have
to
send
them
somewhere
else
in
it.
If
it
is
over
12,
it
comes
out
of
the
kitty
and
then,
when
all
that
is
done,
we
pay
$150
per
detention
day
or
whatever
they're
going
rate
is
at
that
time.
If
they
raise
their
prices
to
160
170
or
if
it
goes
down
for
some
strange
reason,
I
don't
see
that
happening.
Nothing
ever
goes,
but
if
that
actually
happens,
then
we
have
to
pay
a
hundred
and
fifty
per
day.
Did
you
have
a
question.
D
D
A
A
That's
just
a
basic
rate
for
food,
shelter,
education,
I
think
and
the
basic
services,
and
we
can
get
you
a
list
if
you
need
that
the
real
cost
is
the
medical
and
the
site,
psychiatric
services
that
are
typically
ordered
by
the
judges
in
those
situations.
So
but
again,
that's
where
we're
stretching
that
out
till
that's
more
than
likely
going
to
be
met
or
towards
the
end
of
2022
per
the
schedule.
So
financially,
you
know
win
this
PBC
by
the
way.
We're
PVC
paperwork
is
finalized.
A
A
The
two
hundred
seventy
five
thousand-
that's
outside
of
that
there's
another
part
to
this
that
will
wrap
up
later
that
is
involves
the
PVC
will
get
that
and
it'll
be
only
for
infrastructure,
so
courthouse
for
the
a
DA
stuff
is
kind
of
what
I'm
thinking
for
that
more
than
likely
or
if
that
elevator
cost
us
more
than
we
think
it
will.
Mr.
Levesque
well.
E
A
F
A
A
F
The
53,
because
it's
about
$4,500
a
month,
if
you're
talking
30
days
and
forty
six
hundred
and
fifty
dollars,
if
you're
talking
31
days
so
if
they
have
an
individual
there,
because
this
prize
that
I'm
talking
about
is
the
murder
rates.
This
that
is
happening
that
we
might
not
anticipate
with
all
this
stuff
is
going
around
the
country,
so
I'm
looking
at
fifty
three
thousand
for
one
individual.
F
So
if
you
deal
with
that,
fifty
three
thousand
and
you're,
looking
probably
about
say,
you
got
ten
folks
up
in
there
you're
looking
at
a
half
a
million
dollars
easily,
would
I
not
be
right:
okay,
but
I'm.
Looking
at
a
half
a
million
dollars
that
we're
looking
at.
If
we
have
ten
individuals,
then
for
about
a
year
or
whatever,
because
remind
yourself
that
when
we
got
in
when
we
did
this,
we
were
paying
an
exuberant
amount
of
monies
when
we
had
to
send
them
out
at
that
particular
time.
F
Good
thing
to
know
crime
rate
kind
of
reduce,
but
as
we
now
see,
it's
increasing
so
we're
looking
at
that
half
a
million
so
I'm.
Looking
at
we're.
Looking
at
a
lot
of
this
or
whatever
but
I'm,
looking
at
even
the
buyers
out
of
the
me
and
I
was
in
cash
in
two
years.
However,
we
have
what
this
we'd
like
to
pay
anything
long
as
we
under
the
twelve
dos
20
on
the
no
it's
12
no
over
under
12,
but
we
have
we're.
F
20,
so
when
you're
looking
at
those
numbers,
I'm
looking
at
at
the
small
end
or
whatever
the
what
is
so,
the
one
that
says
that
we're
using
12,
you
can
look
at
that
somewhere
around
a
half
a
million
dollars
and
if
using
the
whole
twenty
by
the
million
that'll
be
taken
out
in
one
year.
If
we
max
I'm,
not
gonna,
saying
I
just
want
to
look
at
most
to
the
picture.
So
if
we're
looking
at
just
the
twelve
we
come,
just
one
person
will
be
53,000.
F
We
need
to
keep
in
consideration
the
benefit
and
I
like
to
see
it
in
like
a
five
or
ten
year,
not
just
the
immediate
but
a
five
or
ten
year.
What
would
happen
in
the
what?
If,
if
this
is
the
case
or
whatever
so
before,
you
make
any
economical
decision
for
a
million
bucks,
and
then
you
jump
in
the
fire
it
having
to
pick
out
several
million.
So
I
would
like
to
see
a
five
year
to
ten
year,
just
as
a
picture
of
a
whatever.
G
Mr.
Lapp,
sir
thank
Thank
You
mr.
chairman.
The
reason
that
we're
getting
out
from
underneath
this
juvenile
center
is
the
laws
have
changed
on
how
you
have
to
try
jouvens
now
correct.
They
have
to
be
tried
within
24
hours
or
at
least
presented
to
a
judge
in
24
hours.
So
wouldn't
that
cut
down
the
beds
that
we
possibly
might
use
going
forward
if
the
law
has
changed.
A
G
Mr.
Latham
this
this
was
brought
up
in
criminal
justice
and
this
tries
his
department
because
he
has
to
have
availability
to
run
these
guys
back
and
forth
that
happens
on
a
weekend
or
a
holiday.
Nothing
stops
right.
The
24
hour
time
period,
so
correct,
I,
like
us
getting
out
of
the
ownership
part
of
it
and
just
rented
if
we
need
to
but
I
think
we'll
rent
less
going
forward
because
of
that
new
loss
possible
well.
A
But
what
we
have
is
to
speak
in
a
little
bit
to
mr.
Snyder's
point.
We
have
predictability
now
and
in
any
scenario,
$500,000
is
less
than
1.2
million
dollars
and
with
no
liability
of
having
any
other
costs.
I
have
not
mentioned
that
we
don't
have
to
pay
for
the
pension
for
the
the
corrections
officers
up
there,
which
is
a
positive
in
fact
back
to
the
tort
fund,
also
the
positive
impact
of
the
tort
fund.
A
There
are
other
savings
that
are
involved,
that
it
is
stark
cash,
we're
getting
five
and
a
half
million
dollars
from
a
facility
that
is
going
to
not
only
take
care
of
the
current
problems
we
have,
but
also
be
able
to
fund
the
current
problems
we
have
going
forward.
As
far
as
the
cost
and
predictability
provide
us
with
a
million
dollars,
cash
that
we
need
and
the
two-point
Center
$275,000.
So
we
can
work
on
the
ad
a
quarter
in
the
ramp
but,
most
importantly,
I'm
a
little
bit
floor
by
the
the
question.
Mr.
A
Snipes
I'm,
not
beating
you
up,
I,
just
I,
don't
quite
understand
how
how
you
can
have
that
type
of
a
thought
process.
Nobody
knows
what
tomorrow
is
gonna
happen.
We
have
twenty
years
ago.
We
would
have
never
done
this
deal
if
we
knew
that
we'd
have
ten
people
at
these
current
days.
We
overpaid
for
that
facility
knowingly
now
almost
a
million
dollars
a
year
for
the
whole
time
period,
but
it
wasn't
a
bad
deal
because
we
had
a
good
facility
for
the
people
to
go
to
right.
A
Now
we
spent
the
last
year-and-a-half
negotiating
a
deal
that
were
isn't
in
the
best
financial
interest
of
the
county
and
also
taken
into
consideration.
We
have
to
have
a
place
for
these
juveniles
to
hopefully
put
them
through
the
system
and
get
them
back
into
being
productive
citizens
in
our
in
our
society.
I,
don't
know
how
it
could
be
any
better.
A
I,
don't
see
a
downside
to
any
of
the
finance
financial
situation
here
at
all,
it's
only
a
win,
and
if
we
end
up
having
30
people
in
there,
we
would
have
to
have
paid
for
those
anyway,
under
the
old
agreement
you
know,
so
we
would
have
had
all
those
extra
costs
anyway,
plus
they
would
have
had
to
hire
more
cos.
They
would
have
had
more
medical
costs,
so
there
is
no
downside
to
this
agreement.
A
H
You
mr.
chairman
I
just
want
to
commend
you
and
the
negotiating
team.
I
mean
to
my
time
on
the
board
since
2011
between
this
agreement
and
then
having
the
Union
labor
contracts
down
for
five
years,
I
mean
if
you
look
at
what
we've
done
in
just
a
short
period
of
time.
I
mean
financially
it's
a
win-win
for
everybody.
H
A
The
financial
slide
now
down
there
did
you
go
back
ii,
go
down
one
more
one,
more
right,
that's
the
slide.
I
need
to
show
okay.
This
is
the
money
slide.
Okay,
this
is
what
this
is.
What
Finance
is
really
going
to
get
into
beyond
2018
tomorrow?
This
is
the
finances
of
what
this
does.
If
you
look
back
in
2008
and
I
have
a
copy
of
that,
if
you
would
like
to
copy
of
it.
Mr.
Giuliani
D,
at
the
end
of
2016,
we
had
a
4.8
million
dollar
deficit
in
the
general
fund.
A
If
you
look
under
2016
okay,
we
had
an
overall
debt
of
4.08
million
dollars.
If
we
pass
this
today,
we
not
only
take
our
2017
and
wipe
away
the
two
million
dollar
payables,
which
is
actually
in
our
audit
that
we're
gonna
approve
tomorrow.
It
takes
our
fund
balance
between
all
three
funds
down
to
2.0.
What
is
those
8
million
and
then
at
the
end
of
this
budget
year,
will
be
only
945
thousand
dollars
in
the
red
on
the
general
fund,
with
a
1.2
million
dollar
surplus
between
all
three
funds.
A
Two
years
ago
we
had
with
for
point:
was
it
it's
hard
for
me
to
see
here,
4.0
eight
million
dollars?
It
is
a
massive
swing
in
our
finances.
That's
not
just
us!
That's
the
DHS
programs,
that's
everybody
run
and
tight
and
lean
and
mean,
and
not
hiring
a
bunch
of
people
that
we
don't
need,
but
this
deal
allows
us
to
get
out
of
the
hole
and,
if
product
provides
us
cost.
A
If
you
look
at
what
happens
next
year
and
that'll,
be
tomorrow's
discussion
in
finance
we'll
have
we
predict
to
have
over
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
surplus
in
the
general
fund
the
following
year,
it's
gonna
be
up
over
close
to
two
million
we're
gonna
be
back
to
2008
levels.
It
looks
like
by
2021.
This
is.
We
thought
we
had
a
generational
hole
to
dig
out
Oh.
Mr.
H
Bern,
thank
you
again,
mr.
Sherman,
ladies
well
there's
those
of
us
that
were
in
the
group
of
five.
Just
a
few
years
ago,
we
were
talking
a
decade
of
getting
out
of
a
hole,
I
mean
when
we
were
putting
the
numbers
together
in
that
process.
That
summer
I
mean
this
is
astonishing
when
you
think
about
it.
It's
my
own
two
cents,
mr.
Haas
Thank,.
A
Got
sent
back
to
Rules,
Committee
I
believe.
Is
that
correct
and
and
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
going
to
come
back
out.
There
are
issues
with
it.
They
send
it
to
rules
committee
that
you
typically
a
place.
They
go
to
die
bills,
do
but
I'm
not
gonna,
say
it
won't
come
back
in
some
form.
I
know
that
there
was
some
consternation
about.
How
are
you
gonna
house,
a
20
year
old
in
the
same
facility
with
a
12
year
old?
That
was
part
of
the
the
issue
and
I
think
they're
gonna
work
through
that.
I
You,
mr.
chairman,
there
was
discussion
of
that
bill
at
UCI
and
there
there
is
continuing
conversation
on
that.
Clearly
Cook
County's
having
an
impact
on
that,
but
there
is
no
way
downstate
counters
II,
particularly
even
further
south
than
us,
would
be
able
to
afford
that
kind
of
a
shift
and
so
I
think
the
general
assembly
ultimately
going
to
understand.
They
may
figure
out
some
way
to
segregate
in
statue
counties
over
3
million
in
those
under
3
million.
I.
Think
that's
happened
before
sure.
A
K
J
J
Yes,
that's
out
there
there's
a
lot
of
issues
tied
to
that
bill,
they're
non
related
to
detention
that
caused
a
lot
of
problems
for
us
detentions,
one
issue
of
raising
the
age,
but
there's
a
lot
of
other
supervision
and
court
related
issues
that
are
a
lot
of
problems
with
that.
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
people
making
a
lot
of
noise
about
it,
not
just
on
the
detention
side,
which
is
a
major
problem,
but
it's
also,
you
know
a
lot
of
other
things.
J
J
We
have
carry
about
2,900
detention
days
on
average,
we'd
had
to
have
close
to
10,000
days
to
get
to
down
to
that
one
$150
mark
or
down
to
the
daily
rate
we'd
have
to
have
like
9600,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
deal
going
forward
and
I
think
it
was
bleeding
so
bad
before
we
just
had
to
say
well
we'll
worry
about
legislation
later
and
deal
with
it,
but
I
still
think
they
raise
the
agents.
Gonna
be
a
lot
initiatives
from
the
state
to
not
to
detain
minors
and
to
get
them
out
of
custody.
J
F
F
Deal
with
the
detentions
and
we're
talking
Juba
now.
Is
there
an
unrest
because
of
what
is
happening
that
could
possibly
escalate
the
detention
rate,
because
I'm
looking
at
I
think
there's
a
misunderstanding
as
to
the
what
I
consider
to
be
almost
a
non-criminal
but
they're
not
selling
me
charges
where
they
let
them
in
and
out
versus
those
that
are
felony
of
the
concerns
where
the
courts
feel
that
is
unsafe
and
they're
going
to
detain
these
individuals
I
understand
the
48.
I
will
turn
it.
F
J
Of
course,
anything
could
spike
up
a
little
bit.
I
think
that's
why
we
went
over
10
years
of
numbers.
The
last
10
years
went
over
them
and
looked
at
them,
and
you
know,
that's
I,
think
the
best
predictor
of
what's
going
to
happen.
I
think
you
know
we
did.
We
just
didn't
look
at
the
last
two
years
and
say
well:
here's
what
we
had
last
year.
Let's
that's
our
average.
J
It's
we
looked
at
10
years
of
it
the
went
through
it
and
debated
it,
and
everything
like
that
and,
like
I
said,
like
I,
said
the
numbers
we
have
are
true
what
happens
going
forward
and
some
sort
of
spike
and
areas
of
course
that
can
happen.
I
mean
I'm,
not
gonna
here
and
say
something
couldn't
happen,
but
I
think
the
trend
has
been
detaining
less
and
less,
and
that's
why
the
estimated
revenue
side
from
other
counties
using
this
facility.
J
We
would
get
part
of
that
revenue
for
our
agreement
that
never
materialized
the
way
they
said
it
would
because
initiatives
were
not
to
detain
juveniles,
and
so
the
revenue
was
very
little.
Other
counties
didn't
utilize.
A
facility
like
we
thought
they
would
so
yeah
the
spikes
I'm
sure
there
will
be
at
times,
but
I
think
the
numbers
we
have
are
a
good
indicator
of.
What's
gonna.
A
Now
any
other
questions
for
mr.
Latham
all
right.
Mr.
McCarty,
do
you
have
any
statements,
at
least
on
the
numbers
that
we
have
run
in
the
predictive
modeling
that
we
have
here?
Maybe
we'll
talk
more
in
finance
about
1920-21,
but
is
there
anything
that
you
have
to
add
or
any
questions
anyone
have
any
questions
on
the
financial
aspect
of
this
for
Steve.
So
it's
really
open-ended.
Do
you
have
anything
Steve.
E
One
of
the
discussions
that
we
had
as
the
group
negotiating
this
just
to
put
the
financials
in
a
little
bit
different
perspective,
was
for
the
going
operations.
We
were
through
the
original
IgA
required
as
cover
25%
plus
infrastructure,
and
if
you
look
at
our
head
count
average
headcount
versus
that
25%.
We
are
anywhere
between
8
to
15%
of
actual
bed
space,
but
paying
25%.
E
K
A
I
also
want
to
draw
into
attention
to
that
we're
not
doing
another
20
or
30
year
agreement.
This
we
when,
when
the
kitty
runs
out,
is
when
we
start
talking
about
what
the
rate
is
going
to
be
for
the
next
five-year
agreement,
if
we
so
choose
to
do
that,
so
this
is
not
something
that
is
binding
us
for
a
long
period
of
time.
So
if
that's
the
C's
do
change
we're
able
to
react
to
that
and
then
negotiate
in
good
faith
towards
what
that
needs
to
be
for
the
future.
So
mr.
A
J
Say
another
county
wanted
to
run
a
bed.
There
was
a
formula
in
the
agreement.
How
many
beds
here
well
county
had
available
how
many
bits
we
had
available
and
that
determined
how
much
of
that
money
the
150
we
got
so
any
bed
rented.
There
was
a
little
bit
of
a
you
know,
a
formula
to
it.
Another
thing
I
want
to
point
out
about
the
spike
possibly
talked
about
you
have
to
remember.
In
the
current
agreement
we
paid
25%
of
operations,
but
we
also
paid
25%
of
salaries
that
weren't
reimbursed.
J
J
One
month,
three,
eight
five,
eight
three
hundred
eighty
thousand
five
hundred
I
mean
it
was
a
drastic
and
a
huge
bill
based
on
the
fact
that
grant
aid
was
cut,
they
voucher
for
the
salaries
they
didn't
get
paid
back,
what
they
to
cover
it
and
that
we
got
a
25
bill
for
25
percent
of
that,
so
that
has
gone
away
since
my
grant
Nate's
been
better
so
as
theirs,
but
that's
something
that
could
change
in
the
coming
years
and
we'd
be
get
hit
with
that
bill.
So
mr.
there's.
F
So
when
you
ask
the
questions
and
those
questions
are
being
answered,
you
are
taking
a
logical
perspective
in
order
to
basically
just
dress
to
what
is
and
that's
what
I
need
to
do.
That's
to
say
that
I'm
going
to
vote
against
something
will
not
being
sport
of
it,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
when
I
make
a
decision,
it's
a
contrary
decision.
D
A
A
It
was
a
different
arrangement
that
wasn't
as
favorable
towards
us
and
so
because
they
say
you
got
to
be
prepared
to
walk
away
from
a
deal
in
order
to
make
it
happen.
So
that's
what
I
did,
but
we're
here
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
by
having
Tom
talk
and
Steve
talk
that
and
knowing
that
you
know
he's
done
while
he
doesn't
speak
for
the
chief
judge,
the
chief
judge
is
really
responsible
for
this
he's
in
agreement
that
this
works
for
us
now
this
committee.
A
A
I
A
This
is
to
the
full
board.
You
guys
are
voting
on
the
idea.
Yeah
finance
I'll
just
go
through
the
numbers
with
them,
because
it
it
impacts
what
we
may
do
as
budget
amendments,
because
it
does
impact
Seventeen's
audit
which
will
be
presented
tomorrow.
That's
why
we
had
to
approve
this
here
because
we're
adjusting
off
the
two
million
ap
last
year.
So
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts.
Here
we
went
basically
from
last
year
we
went.
A
L
B
A
Yeah,
exactly
we'll
be
able
to
get
a
lot
text
here
in
a
couple
of
years
now.
I
just
want
to
mention
that
9:45
and
I'll
tell
finance
we're
still
cash-poor.
We
still
the
general
funds
not
out
of
the
hole,
so
we're
not
done.
We've
still
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
but
what
it
means
is
we're
gonna
borrow
less
money
from
ourselves
and
from
other
people
as
we
go
forward
and
that
we
can
consolidate
our
borrowing
just
two
outside
sources
instead
of
internally
I
mean
this
is
a
big
step
towards
the
good
huge.
B
A
I
I
I
To
the
extent
that
provisions
of
the
bill
say
the
Supreme
Court
will
establish
guidelines
and
there's
been
discussion
with
the
Supreme
Court
suggesting
they're
not
prepared
to
do
that
at
all.
So,
even
if
the
bill
were
to
pass,
probably
it
would
not
have
an
impact,
but
it
it's
one
of
the
things
that
we
need
to
be
aware,
that
somebody's
come
up
with
an
idea
and
it
may
end
up
being
legislation.
I
Another
bill,
that's
being
trapped
for
quite
a
while,
because
of
a
situation
in
one
County
is
going
to
require
the
state
to
create
its
own
insurance
company
for
a
liability,
and
that
would
create
some
competition.
That
is
going
to
be
very
difficult
in
terms
of
computation
of
moving
a
public
entity
and
private
insurance
companies
once
again
that
bills
on
track
to
pass.
But
it's
at
this
point
a
little
unclear
exactly
how
that's
going
to
turn
out.
I
I
A
All
right,
interesting,
I
I
had
gotten
some
information
that
the
the
assessment
part
of
the
solar
farm
bill
down
in
Springfield.
There
was
an
agreement
made
on
everything,
except
for
they're
figuring
out
the
valuation.
Is
it
going
to
be
on
the
low
end
like
the
industry
wants
and
I
think
I've
mentioned
this
once
before
and
or
the
high
end,
like?
Obviously,
we
want
and
they're
trying
to
meet
somewhere
in
the
middle
so
that
negotiations
still
ongoing
and
it
doesn't
look
like
it's
gonna
break
down.
A
They're
gonna
come
up
with
something
remember
that
none
of
these
solar
farms
being
built
this
year,
they're
all
gonna,
be
built
next
year,
so
just
wanted
mentioned,
will
have
at
least
a
firm
number
at
some
point,
hopefully
by
the
end
of
this
session.
Thank
you.
Mr.
Lee
I
appreciate
it
information
services.
Mr.
Duvall,
do
you
have
anything
today.
M
We've
taken
that
out,
so
you
can
still
have
room
for
your
paperwork
for
your
going
forward
meetings
and
we've
tied
that
into
the
sound
system
both
for
mics
and
for
speakers.
The
next
phase
that
we're
working
on
we
just
didn't
have
time
to
do.
It
is,
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you're
comfortable
with
that
is
I
plan
on
dedicating
that,
just
purely
when
we
do
a
remote
I,
don't
know
what
we
call
it
remote
conferencing
or
whatever
that
TV
we're
gonna
dedicate
for
the
viewing.
M
So
we
can
see
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
there
and
then
the
other
tools
still
be
available
for
agendas
or
whatever
you
want
to
do.
We'll
just
switch
the
input.
We're
gonna
run
lines
to
that
we're
gonna,
keep
them
out
of
the
way
again
we're
trying
to
make
sure
we
don't
obstruct
your
movement
around
the
board
meeting,
and
you
can
still
do
everything
you
need
to
do
so.
You'll
witness
that
you'll
witness
the
people
there
in
part
of
that
meeting
and
you'll
see
the
presentations
going
on
at
the
other.
M
Two
we've
also
have
to
do.
Additional
wiring
back
to
the
computer
is
actually
doing
the
streaming,
so
we
can
do
what
ultimately
has
to
be
done,
which
is
proved
that
the
to
prove
to
the
public
that
the
people
that
are
that
we
are
saying
remotely
are
voting.
We,
the
public,
can
witness
them
actually
doing
that.
Basically,
what
we're
going
to
do
is
run
another
system
tie
it
into
our
streaming
computer,
so
we'll
have
picture
in
picture
and
not
disrupt
the
ultimate
goal.
M
On
top
of
that
is
to
make
sure
we
don't
disrupt
your
normal
meeting,
I
want
it
to
make
it
as
close
to
what
you
normally
do
here
as
a
meeting
as
possible.
So
we
move
forward
to
that.
We've
just
got
to
put
the
wiring
in
there.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
more
questions
to
that
you're
still.
What
you
still
need
to
do
is
not
go
through
me.
You
need
to
address
through
through
the
fifth
floor,
the
Chairman
needs
to
approve
any
future
meetings.
M
I
have
discussed
another
board
member
with
another
board
limit
about
going
forward.
That
person
said
they're,
probably
going
to
be
showing
up
the
physically
at
the
next
meetings,
but
I'm
still
moving
forward,
as
you
asked
to
have
something
in
place
for
that.
The
one
thing
I
do
ask
this
has
more
to
do
with
board
members
and
not
board
members
with
department
heads
the
county
board
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
here,
these
county
board
meetings
are
the
county
boards
meeting,
so
in
any
department
head
or
anybody
representing
a
department.
M
It's
going
to
have
a
presentation.
I
would
ask
that
you
get
that
information
presentations
PDFs
to
the
fifth
floor
by
that
Friday,
because
what
we
need
to
do
is
allow
the
fifth
floor,
the
ability
to
get
the
documents
to
the
people
they're
going
to
be
remotely
dealing,
because
we
have
no
way
to
get
that
back
to
them.
So
if
they're
going
to
be
voting
on
something-
and
you
mean
to
have
a
presentation-
you
need
to
get
plenty
of
time
for
the
fifth
floor
to
be
able
to
get
the
documents.
I
would.
A
A
A
E
M
At
tinker's
home
she
acts,
hers
was
pretty
simple
because
of
work.
She
does
with
the
college,
she
does
podcasting
or
a
moment.
So
actually
we
have
planned
it
going
out
there
and
setting
it
up
for
we
didn't
need
to
this
case.
She
had
everything
she
needed
to
so
week.
I
know,
there's
she
had
a
laptop,
she
had
a
Mac.
What
we
basically
did
is
sent
the
email
out
to
her.
She
clicked
and
we
tested
two
days
before
similar.
M
E
M
A
Sir,
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
when
you
see
it
on
the
screen.
If
we
have,
you
know
someone
who's,
you
know
laid
up
with
knee
surgery
or
whatever,
and
they
want
to
vote
at
the
full
board.
That's
the
whole
point
of
the
situation.
It's
it's!
Not
a
convenience!
Ii
order
to
to
be
an
oh
I,
don't
know
Arizona
or
something
that's
out
of
time.
A
We
want
people
to
be
here
about
something
down
the
road
right
and
the
other
thing
is:
is
we
don't
want
to
use
county
or
taxpayer
resources
to
be
out
setting
up
people's
homes
to
be
remote
locations?
To
do
that
they
would
have
to
have
their
own
laptops.
You
know
their
own
equipment
to
do
this
stuff.
You
know
we
can
just
facilitate
it.
So
that's
important.
We
don't
talk
about
it,
but
that's
it's
very
difficult
for
us
to
to
take
that
resource
to
be
able
to
leave
here.
It's
actually
kind
of
a
proper.
A
So,
no
beyond
that,
the
reason
that
we
started
all
this
was
because
I
said
we
may
be
the
only
people
that
still
with
the
type
of
production
quality
that
we
have
still
broadcast,
live
our
meetings
that
have
all
of
them
recorded,
and
we
started
that
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
and
you
know
we
don't
have
10,000
people
watching
us
every
day,
but
it's
still
out
there.
People
can
still
come
to
the
meetings
from
their
phone
as
they
happen,
so
to
speak,
so
it
usually
doesn't
happen,
at
least
in
this
area.
A
L
M
A
M
A
C
A
N
N
N
B
A
O
Morning,
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
update
everybody
on
what
I've
been
doing
for
the
last
first
30
days
and
kind
of
give
you
an
idea
of
what
my
thoughts
are
for
the
next
between
30
and
90
days,
so
you
kind
of
have
a
feel
for
what
my
priorities
have
been
and
what
I
see
them
over
the
next
couple
months.
You
do
have
the
staffing
report
for
the
last
month
in
front
of
you,
there
are
some
increases.
You'll
see
increases
there,
especially
down
in
the
sheriff's
and
corrections
area.
O
The
first
30
days
really
started
off
with
a
civil
rights
compliance
questionnaire
that
is
required
for
the
probation
state's
attorney
and
sheriff's
departments.
They
have
some
federal
grants
that
are
administered
by
the
Illinois
criminal
justice
information
Authority.
This
questionnaire
is
maybe
20
questions,
but
a
relate
to
our
EEOC
policies,
our
a88
policies
and
our
LEP
or
limited
English
proficiency.
O
'pliance
questionnaire
is
due
May
30th
I
actually
received
it
in
my
email,
the
day
I
started,
so
that
was
a
nice
introduction.
So
I've
been
working
with
those
three
departments
on
getting
that
done.
I
sent
drafts
to
probation
and
state's
attorney
yesterday,
I'll
finish
the
sheriff's
today
and
then
hopefully
get
those
out
I
want
to
have
those
done
by
Friday
so
that
those
are
off
to
where
they
need
to
be.
O
We
had
several
HR
related
issues
starting
day,
two
that
required
about
my
first
week,
two
weeks
of
focus
and
really
what
came
out
of
that
is
that
led
to
a
decision
during
discussions
with
Andy,
that
we
need
some
additional
training
for
both
our
employees
and
for
our
leaders
of
our
departments.
So
I'll
be
talking
a
little
bit
more
about
that
as
I
move
forward,
but
it's
been
identifying
some
resources
for
some
additional
training
so
that
we
can
all
be
more
focused
on
the
right
processes
to
follow.
O
We
are
making
progress
on
the
courthouse,
ABA
compliance
activities,
everything
excluding
the
ramp
and
the
courtroom.
So
there's
a
lot
of
things
like
brochure
holders
interpreter
office,
signage,
some
rescue
mats
that
needed
to
be
ordered.
Those
are
all
on
order
and
everything
should
be
installed
by
next.
Friday
is
our
goal,
so
once
we
get
that,
then
the
only
two
things
left
would
be
the
ramp
and
the
courtroom,
so
hopefully
we'll
be
in
pretty
good
shape.
O
With
everything
else
will
be
checked
off
the
list,
then
we'll
be
making
photographs
and
then
Andy
will
draft
a
letter
to
the
Attorney
General,
so
kind
of
give
them
an
update
on
where
we're
at
with
all
those
I
did
meet
with
our
the
county's
liability
carrier
and
submitted
to
them
all
our
policies
and
our
risk
management
policy
to
have
them
review
it.
They
have
a
no
charge
service
where
their
attorney
looks
at
our
policies.
Some
of
them
are
I
would
say
dated
the
computer
policy
and
social
media
policy
are
dated
2012.
O
So
obviously
things
have
changed
since
then
they
need
a
fresh
set
of
eyes,
so
we'll
go
through
that
process.
First
with
them
at
no
charge
they're
willing
to
do
that
for
us.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
happens
and
then
I
did
meet
with
people
et
Cie
down
the
road
to
talk
to
them
about
a
discussion
review,
not
from
a
legal
standpoint,
more
of
an
HR
standpoint.
O
Looking
at
those
same
policies,
I
want
to
have
take
advantage
of
the
free
service
first
so
that
there
we
can
minimize
the
time
that
we
have
anybody
that
we're
paying
to,
hopefully
save
us
some
dollars.
I
also
talked
with
them
about
frontline
training
for
our
managers,
so
I
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
training
and
there
are
two
free
services
that
we're
going
to
take
advantage
of.
O
First
before
we
look
to
people
et
Cie,
there's
a
series
of
training
that's
available
on
the
web
via
Paylocity
our
payroll
service,
so
I
laid
out
training
over
the
next
seven
months
for
both
employees
and
employers.
So
there's
diversity,
training,
let's
see
anti-discrimination
anti-bullying,
their
supervisor,
only
training
for
HR
employment
law
and
wage
and
hour
law,
and
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
assign
one
training
every
month.
So
it's
not
overly
burdensome.
O
I
took
one
of
the
trainings
and
it
took
me
probably
two
hours,
but
there
were
interruptions
so
I
think
you
could
probably
do
it
in
an
hour.
So
we'll
asset
you
can
assign
those
through
the
payroll
service
and
then
we'll
get
back
a
notice
when
it's
all
completed
so
we'll
be
able
to
track
that
people
are
taking
the
proper
training.
So
again,
that's
at
no
charge
to
us
other
than
our
team
members
time.
The
other
no
charge
one
is
our
liability
carrier
as
well.
O
We've
had
a
couple
policies
or
a
couple
instances
where
we
don't
know
that
there's
a
worker's
comp
claim
until
the
carrier
calls
us.
We
need
to
shore
up
our
policies
and
then
do
a
better
job.
I.
Think
of
communicating
with
our
department
heads
on
what
that
procedure
is
and
how
we
can
work
together
with
them
to
the
situation
and
be
consistent
about
how
we're
addressing
that
initial
report
of
injury.
A
So
I
guess,
if
I
could
I
just
mentioned
the
the
first
month
was
supposed
to
be
kind
of
ease
into
it,
and
the
fire
hose
got
turned
on
right
away
and
almost
everything
was
really
high
level,
HR
related,
and
so
one
of
the
things
I
had
asked.
Anita
about
and
I
actually
talked
to,
Jo
Ann
and
the
I'll
call
it
the
risk
management
committee.
But
it
was
really
just
a
safety
committee.
Not
just
I
mean
all
they
did
was
safety
stuff
were
we're.
A
We
have
the
head
of
risk
management
for
all
of
the
administration
and
really
the
the
entire
county.
If
you
will
to
be
able
to
help
look
at
work,
comp
liability
safety.
All
of
these
things
within
that
risk
management.
So
a
big
part
of
the
administrators
job
is
facilitating
this
overall,
not
only
financial
projections
and
modeling,
and
all
of
that
it's
this
whole
program
of
how
do
we
reduce
the
risk
and
obviously
work
with
our
state's
attorney's
office
to
help
mitigate
that
too,
as
well.
A
O
It's
an
HR
payroll
service
firm
that
is
located
a
block
down
and
they
outsource.
They
assist
companies
both
in
their
HR
and
payroll
needs.
They
do
a
lot
of
payroll
processing
which
we're
not
interested
in,
but
another
function
is
HR,
it's
HR
resources.
So
what
eventually
I'd
like
to
have
them
do
is
look
at
all
our
HR
forms.
I,
don't
think
some
of
them
seem
dated
to
me
on
first
blush
I'd,
really
like
somebody
to
take
another
look
at
them.
There
can
be
things
questions
on
there.
Our
application
is
one
that
we
drafted.
O
A
O
O
What
do
I
want
to
say
webinars
for
different
levels
in
the
organization,
so
some
that
are
more
all
employee
focused,
so
anti-bullying
anti-violence
within
the
workplace.
But
then
there
are
also
others
that
are
more
leader
team
leader
focused,
so
you
would
split
it
between
the
employees
would
see
a
different
webinar,
then
their
supervisor
would
the
supervisor
would
see
one
that
is
more
focused
on
them,
recognizing
what's
going
on
within
their
department
and
then
what
actions
they're
responsible
for
taking
to
resolve
that
situation.
So
it
could
be
all
of
them.
O
F
It's
kind
of
similar
to
the
gcn
training
kind
of
like
we
take
it
to
district
or
whatever,
where
it
has
a
list
of
different.
The
other
concern
is
if
we,
if
this
training
is
being
kind
of
mandated,
is
this
going
to
be?
Is
there
gonna
be
time
on
their
available
jobs
for
them
to
do
this,
or
are
we
gonna
have
to
stick
up
the
expense
of
them
if
they
have
to
take
it
outside
of
that
job
time
to
cover
D
or
L
complaints
that
could
arise?
The.
A
The
only
mandates
that
we're
able
to
make
is
within
the
administration
department.
Those
folks
will
have
the
computers
available
either
at
their
workstations
or
within
other
places
where
they
can
congregate
and
do
this
on
during
the
work
hours.
I
would
hope
that
the
elected
department
heads
would
see
value
in
this
and
would
allow
their
employees
to
do
that.
We
obviously
know
we
don't
have
dominion
over
how
the
sheriff
or
the
recorder
or
anybody
else
operates
their
own
office.
It's
up
to
them.
We
can't
require
this
of
them.
A
It's
in
their
best
interest
to
make
sure
that
these
employees
have
documented
training
in
these
areas
if
a
situation
should
arise
so,
but
as
far
as
those
other
departments,
they
will
make
their
own
call.
We
will
definitely
make
sure
it's
available
to
all
of
them,
though,
and
I
don't
see,
I
can't
see
why
they
wouldn't
allow
it,
but
it's
in
their
best
interest
and
their
employees
as
well,
so,
but
no
nothing
off
hours
if
they
so
choose
to
do
that,
that's
they'll
have
a
link.
They
could
do
it,
but
there.
L
O
Is
a
procedure
to
notify
their
supervisor
I
there
seems
to
be
some
maybe
needs
to
be
shored
up
a
little
bit
and
and
reminders
given
and
in
the
form
itself.
One
of
the
notices
came
without
the
right
form,
I
think
there's.
Maybe
it
hasn't
been
reinforced
recently
and
I
guess.
That's
kind
of
my
thought.
Process
and
I
talked
to
Andy
about
this.
So
many
of
these
trainings
a
lot
of
times
and
you
see
it
across
organizations
a
lot
we
have.
We
have
a
Handbook
which
is
given
to
every
employee
the
day.
They
start.
O
It
really
takes
more
than
handing
someone
a
handbook
on
day
one.
It
takes
constant
reinforcement
of
what's
going
on
both
at
an
employee
and
a
team
leader
level,
and
that's
what
we'll
be
looking
to
do
is
is
kind
of
make
remind
everyone
of
what
our
processes
are,
making
sure
that
we've
got
everything
buttoned
up.
Thank.
L
A
A
And
the
reappointment
of
john
Jericka
md
to
the
Kankakee
County
Board
of
Health,
I,
guess
I'll
start
with
mr.
hinder
Leiter.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
mr.
Siraj
mr.
Snipes,
all
those
in
favor
and
those
opposed
moving
on
to
dr.
Jerrica
motion
to
approve
mister
all
talk,
mr.
Washington,
all
those
in
favor.
Those
opposed
motion
carries
openings
to
openings.
You
want
to
accept
that
Craig.
L
A
Do
we
do
we
have
to
I'm
just
here
doing
but
I
said
proper
yeah,
just
ok,
resign
Oh
a
motion
to
approve
the
resignation
of
mr.
basted
mr.
Washington
mr.
Vickery
I'm,
making
you
second
mistake.
All
those
in
favor
those
opposed
I
have
to
look
that
one
up.
Do
we
have
to
approve
a
resignation?
If
we
don't,
what
do
we
do.
C
A
We
accept
the
resignation,
ok,
I
see
it
was
my
first
time
on
that
one:
two
openings
Regional
Planning
Commission,
one
opening
manteno
drainage,
district
number
3,
another
opening,
manteno
number
9
drainage
district.
Another
opening
will
can
Regional
Development
Authority,
two
openings
on
the
Essex
Township
Fire
Protection
District,
and
just
so
you
know,
that's
been
on
there
for
a
few
months.
I've
called
them
left
messages.
I
am
not
hearing
back
from
that
district,
so
mr.
Hess
may
know
better
than
I.
Can
they
vote
on
anything
I?
Had
it's
different.
D
A
A
This
is
just
another
opening
moving
on
to
other
business
approval
of
the
circuit,
clerk's
monthly
report
for
April
2018
motion
to
approve
so
mr.
Atif
mr.
Vickery.
Second,
all
those
in
favor
those
opposed
by
the
way
these
are
from
the
cancel
of
criminal
justice
committee.
So
we
can
move
into
the
full
board
approval
of
the
public
defenders.
Monthly
report,
March
2018
motion,
mr.
Levesque.
Mr.
roll
talk,
all
those
in
favor
those
opposed
and
the
approval
of
the
state's
attorney
grand
jury
report
motion
to
approve
mr.
Washington
mr.
Sirois,
all
those
in
favor.
A
A
C
A
K
Morning,
everybody
first
and
foremost,
Sandi
wanted
to
be
here
if
she
had
a
scheduling
conflict
and
sends
her
apologies
for
not
being
here
in
person,
but
she
asked
our
office
to
come
up
with
some
language
in
terms
of
changing
the
designations
in
her
office.
For
small
claims
cases,
I
took
a
look
at
the
clerk
of
the
courts
act.
What
you're,
looking
at
fun
of
you
is
in
line
with
that
there's,
no
real
legal
issue
to
do
so.
K
I
think
it
was
just
a
convenience
back
in
2009
when
this
was
originally
set
up
to
split
the
small
claims
cases
between
two
thousand
two
hundred
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
ten
thousand
into
two
different
categories.
Now
that
her
office
is
becoming
more
digital,
less
paper
going
through
the
systems
are
having
a
hard
time
talking
to
one
another,
with
these
five
designations
that
don't
line
up
with
the
clerk
of
the
court.
Precisely
since
she's
asking
to
combine
those
two
back
into
the
same
category
and
keep
the
fee
as
is
appropriate,
that's
$75!
B
A
K
B
D
A
D
A
I
mean
I,
wanted
to
lease
this
committee
to
no
because
it
may
come
up
in
in
pza
and
I've
alerted
the
media
to
this
and
I've
alerted
the
developer,
and
apparently
the
the
opposition
group
knows
it
as
well
that
in
our
haste
to
or
after
the
the
solar
farm
at
Highland
Road
was
not
approved.
Okay,
we
failed
to
do
the
findings
of
fact.
A
That's
the
email
I
sent
to
all
the
dissenting
votes
saying
we
have
to
get
that
on
the
record,
so
we
have
to
write
that
down
and
I'll
read
it
in
the
record
or
you
can
say
it
in
the
record
or,
however,
to
get
it
in
there,
which
one
of
the
criteria
was
not
met
accordingly.
In
our
PZ,
a
committee
meeting
when
I
was
discussing
that
there
was
a
motion
made
on
the
floor
by
this
person.
A
That
was
in
the
majority,
because
that's
an
important
there
was
a
motion
made
by
person
and
majority,
which
was
the
dissenting
vote
for
a
motion
to
reconsider,
to
send
it
back
to
the
full
board,
and
that
was
passed.
So
at
the
the
board
meeting
there
will
be
a
motion
to
reconsider
as
executive
committee.
You
shouldn't
know
this
and
what
the
procedure
is.
Basically,
that
vote
will
come
and
people
could
say
no
I'm
fine.
A
We
shouldn't
reconsider
this
or
yes,
I
want
to
reconsider
it
and
they
can
keep
their
vote
the
same
or
do
whatever
they
want
to
do,
but
regardless
there
will
be
the
findings
of
fact
to
mix
into
that
whole
view
of
information.
That's
going
on
whether
we
reconsider
it,
whether
we
don't
reconsider
it,
whether
the
new
vote
fails
or
passes.
There
will
be
a
findings
of
fact
to
find
out
why
all
the
dissenting
votes,
which
one
of
the
criteria
was
not
met,
that
is
the
only
horse
I
have
in
this
race,
is
to
do
it.
G
A
A
Would
come
immediately,
it
can
only
happen
at
the
next
meeting.
Okay
I
have
a
full
board,
and
so
just
so
you
know
the
motion
would
be
to
accept
the
zba
findings
and
approve
the
variance
or
the
special
use.
Excuse
me
or
then.
If
it
fails,
then
you
do
the
finding
it
back
for
the
no
votes.
If
it
passes
you've
accepted
you
don't
need
to
do
the
finding
of
fact,
because
that's
already
been
accepted,
so
I
went
through
all
the
details
and
that's
why
I
sent
that
email
out
saying
we
never
did
the
finding
of
fact.
A
So
we
can
do
that
and
read
it
into
the
record
at
the
next
board.
That's
my
only
horse
on
the
races
to
do
it
the
right
way
and
if
you
so
choose
to
not
reconsider
it,
that
vote
stands
and
then
we
do
finding
a
fact
from
those
17
people
does
that
make
sense.
I
know
it's
clear
as
mud,
but
we
have
to
go
through
this
procedural
measure.
Mr.
Washington
I
was.
P
We
acted
more
on
emotion
than
we
did
on
facts
and,
as
I
looked
through
the
finding
of
facts,
I
couldn't
find
any
reason
to
disagree
with
those
finding
of
facts.
So
to
me,
it's
it's
a
simple
thing:
we
need
to
look
again
into
ourselves
and
think
about
what
this
board
is
here
to
do,
rather
than
what
we
feel
emotionally
about
people
campaigning
against
a
particular
project.