►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 2/24/2021
Description
Finance Committee Meeting 2/24/2021 9:00 AM
A
B
A
E
B
E
A
F
F
So
I
sent
the
information
that
we
received
last
week
from
illinois,
the
igfoa
association
and
iml.
The
there's
also
proposed
increase
or
change
to
corporate
loopholes,
they're,
calling
it
to
close
or
modify
it,
which
potentially
could
absorb
or
be
more
than
what
they're,
reducing
us.
The
amount
for
just
for
discussion
purposes.
At
this
point.
Just
so
we're
all
aware
at
ten
percent
the
the
first
report,
the
normal
monthly
reports
that
I
put
behind
this
document
was
the
income
tax.
F
So
at
this
point
it
might
be
a
minimum
change
to
our
current
fiscal
year,
but
it's
something
that
we
have
to
keep
an
eye
on
down
the
road,
especially
for
fiscal
year.
22
and
beyond,
we'll
see
what
happens
with
the
trend
and
all
of
you
will
be
able
to
see
it
because
we
watch
it
monthly
here
as
we
go.
So
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
cover
that
and
include
the
income
tax
report
right
in
front
of
it
and
then
answer
any
questions.
If
there
are
anything
on
that
subject,.
G
A
They
they
just
increased
mft
a
year
ago,
I
believe
yeah,
and
so
it's
substantially
more
than
it
was
the
local
part.
Of
course
they
their
part
grew
as
well
on
the
state
side
yeah
more
than
ours
did,
but
that's
okay.
I
guess
I
just
so
you
know
I
just
if
they
start
to
roll
that
back.
Then
that's
what
I'm
worried
about
yeah
any
other
questions
regarding.
F
D
D
A
H
A
And
some
call
it
what
some
one
man's
I
guess
corporate
loophole
is
is:
is
one
person
survival
survival
and
again
without
any
personal
ire,
I
will
say
that
the
assault
on
county
finances
continues
out
of
springfield.
Unfunded
mandates
are
pushing
everything
to
us,
and
that
means
less
services
locally.
A
F
F
We
just
ended
our
fiscal
year
as
far
as
sales
tax
and
use
tax,
and
so
you
can
see
we
were
down
for
fiscal
year
20
as
far
as
how
this
hits
our
fiscal
year
compared
to
the
months.
You
know
when
we
receive
it
down
about
eight
percent,
an
fy
20
in
total,
so
about
360,
000
different
from
fy
19
to
fi,
20,
total
of
sales,
tax
change.
F
Use
tax
is
up
29,
a
275
thousand
dollar
increase
from
prior
year,
so
some
positive
news
in
there
and
then
I
also
included
bradley
bourbon,
a
kankakee
city
kankakee.
Just
following
even
though
they're
fiscal
year,
I
follow
our
same
fiscal
year.
So
we
can
just
watch
apples
to
apples
and
see
what
their
trend
is
as
compared
to
ours
and
how
that
you
know
how
their
trend
impacts.
F
Our
trend,
I've
kept
bradley
separate
for
now,
with
their
new
income
tax
I'll
have
to
blend
that,
because
I'll
run
out
of
space
as
far
as
analysis
wise.
But
you
know
I
have
that
just
to
show
at
least
through
the
covered
months
you
know
and
how
ours
represented.
So
that
way,
it's
an
apples-to-apples
analysis
and
as
well
as
the
bed
rental
information
as
well.
So
if
there's
any
questions
on
the
rest
of
them,
but
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
a
few
highlights.
H
H
D
F
That
the
next
set
we'll
discuss
is
our
cash
flow
analysis
or
update.
We
are
heading
into
the
lowest
time
of
the
year.
If
you
will
for
cash
flow,
then
you
have
may
and
june
highlighted
there
may
in
june,
of
21
highlighted
showing,
where
we're
at,
if
you
take
a
moment
and
flip,
and
look
at
may
and
june
of
20
you'll
see
that
we're
slightly
above
or
very
similar
in
those
two
months.
F
F
So
for
all
the
department
heads
that
may
be
listening,
please
understand
that
we're
coming
into
the
the
toughest
four
months
of
the
year
for
cash
flow
and
if
you
have
any
large
items,
if
it
could
be
held
off
to
july,
please
do
that
and
we'll
manage,
keep
close
eye
on
and
manage
it,
because
these
are
month
ending.
Sometimes,
when
accounts
payable
shows
up-
and
we
just
you
know,
get
through
payroll
and
the
timing
of
when
these
revenues
show
up
you
know
the
weeks
can
look
a
little
different
than
what
the
month
does.
F
So
we
have
to
we
watch
this
very
closely
as
we
go
through
and
the
line
that
could
get
affected
excuse
me
would
be
the
miscellaneous
vendor
payments
on
the
outflows.
If
we
and
then
also
in
the
past,
we've
had
to
affect
that
line.
We've
also
had
to
slow
down
potentially
slow
down
the
imrf
payment.
So
those
are
two
areas
that
could
get
hit
depending
on
timing,
and
when
you
know
the
the
revenue
flows,
the
actual
cash
shows
up.
F
So
so
it's
not
the
roof
is
not
collapsing
or
falling
in,
but
it
is
cautionary
and
what,
since
we're
heading
into
those
months,
that
everybody
will
be
aware
of
that
and
and
know
that
some
fluctuation
may
take
place.
Because
of
that,
so
that's
an
update
there.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
questions
or
not
from
the
committee.
C
F
A
C
A
A
It's
a
lot
of
money.
I
don't
know
how
it
would
get
paid
for
in
a
lifetime
if
everybody's
getting
that
kind
of
money,
but
just
to
mention
I
don't
know,
that's
what
we'll
see,
but
originally
there
was
no
strings
attached
and
now
I
think,
they're
adding
strings
to
it.
So
you
have
to
be
able
to
directly
attribute
it
as
it
stands
now
to
covet.
So
that
was
the
same
question
from
two
different
angles
for
what
the
people
are
going
to
get
in.
A
F
Well,
my
originally,
I
went
to
the
cure
grant
the
monies
that
we
received
during
fy
20
for
cobit
related,
and
we
had
to
provide
backup
invoices
information
to
prove
that
it
was
coveted
related,
and
I
mean
that
they
paid
pretty
quickly
as
far
as
grant
related,
but
there's
still
a
turnaround,
even
even
with
that
kind
of
reimbursement.
Even
when
we're
allotted,
if
we're
a
lot
of
this
new,
you
know
something
new
for
fy21
code
related,
there's
a
there's
still
a
turnaround
time
before
we
get
reimbursed
for
things
that
we've
expensed,
okay,.
A
Sure
it's
it's
a
little
bit
different.
This
time,
though,
I
won't
say
that
that
when
robin
or
congresswoman
kelly
called
me,
oh
geez,
I
want
to
say
november
when
this
was
first
submitted.
There
were
no
strings
attached,
it
wasn't
like
cures
or
cares.
It
was
different.
You
could
use
it
to
just
for
whatever
in
the
county
and
now
they're
starting
to
put
those
strings
on
it.
A
So
what
started
as
one
thing
is
probably
going
to
go
into
something
else,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
it
could
be
used
for,
because
you
know
job
loss,
mental
health.
You
know
the
court
systems.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
you
know
we
need
to
deal
with
because
covet's
not
going
away.
It's
just
a
vaccine's
coming
around,
but
it's
still
going
to
be
here
for
years
to
come.
I
think-
and
I
think
most
people
realize
that
so
go
ahead.
Steve
mr
siroi
yeah.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
or
mr
mccarty,
for
the
colleagues
in
the
room,
and
maybe
those
that
are
new
watching
on
youtube.
Can
you
explain
the
wormhole
of
the
taws
that
we
were
in
a
few
years
ago
and
why
it's
a
a
pleasure
not
to
have
to
have
taws
and
the
problems
that
they
could
cause
going
forward
with
the
borrowing
and
our
our
our
rate
of
operating
yeah
rating
bond
rating
that
we
had
to
like
twist
some
arms
of
local
banks
to
borrow
against
so
either
one
of
you
men?
F
I'm
I'm
trying
to
forget
it,
but
you
know
I'll
I'll,
explain
it
the
the
depth
of
our
our
borrowing
with
the
tax
anticipation
warrants,
which
is
borrowing
against
your
next
property
tax
cycle,
your
levy
that
was
as
high
as
5
million
plus
nf
on
borrowing.
I
believe
we
were
up
nearly
at
the
10
million
dollar
mark
to
try
to
get
through
the
springtime
at
our
worst
time.
A
Yeah
we're
spending
next
year's
taxes
this
year
just
to
survive,
that's
about
the
best
way.
To
put
it
and
that's,
it
can
become
a
death
spiral
yeah
and
we
got
out
of
it,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
were
going
to
talk
about
it,
steve
but
steve.
We
were
looking
at
our
our
fund
balance
totals
you
brought
me
in
the
numbers
and
where
we
were
in
2015.
A
When
I
don't
know,
if
you
guys
remember
that
who
weren't
on
the
board,
but
those
that
were
here,
we
amended
the
budget
on
the
floor
and
crafted
a
whole
new
budget
that
and
it
took
us
from
losing
another
2
million
back
and
broke
us
even
for
that
year.
Basically,
that
was
the
start
of
it.
That
was
15
and
it's
11
million
dollar
turnaround.
Since
then,
yeah
it's
substantial
and
we
don't
borrow
the
money
and
we
paid
back
money.
We
owed
it's
big
difference,
yeah
huge,
huge,
I'm
sorry,
anything
else,
steve
on
that
topic,
t.a.w.s.
F
F
A
Well,
when
the
time
comes,
we'll
have
a
motion
to
approve,
combine
and
approve,
but
they
all
need
to
be
explained.
The
first
one
is
the
auditor
has
said:
there's
no
public
purpose
for
the
county
board
picture
that
we
had
done,
and
so
he
rejected
that
claim
as
saying
that
it
shouldn't
recommend
it
for
payment.
That
was
the
first
one.
I
did
the
same
thing
last
year
as
well,
so
the
public
officials
don't
get
the
group
photo
for
the
the
walls
and
the
whatever
else.
So
that
was
one
of
them.
A
The
second
one
is.
We
joined
the
illinois
state
association
of
counties,
as
you
remember,
and
the
first
bill
it
was.
We
negotiated
that
down
to
three
thousand
and
on
the
auditor's
notes.
He
rejected
that
one
saying
that
I
am
not
signing
yeah,
I'm
not
signing
this.
As
recommendation
for
approval,
this
organization
has
a
policy
statement
and
direct
conflict
with
the
current
law.
We
will
not
support
paying
dues
to
such
an
organization
like
it
matters
what
he
thinks
on
what
organization
the
county
board
joins.
A
A
A
So
their
position
is.
Is
that
the
counties
if
they
have
to
pay
the
fines
so
to
speak,
then
they
should
actually
decide
the
risk
involved
in
the
internal
controls,
which
management
always
does.
So
it's
the
position,
statements
against
the
auditors
instead
of
the
law,
you
understand
what
I'm
saying
they
want
it
changed
so
again,
the
other
one
was
a
rejection
of
a
bill
for
the
cell
phones
at
animal
control.
I
Yeah,
I
would
just
say
that
the
ledgers,
if
you
will
of
of
numbers
called,
is
the
same
reason.
We
don't
provide
them
for
our
deputies,
because
we
are
calling
people
involved
in
some
criminal
cases,
and
especially
in
this
case,
we
actually
have
a
case
where
someone
in
the
auditor's
office
is
a
witness
in
one
of
our
cases,
a
non-cooperating,
a
non-cooperating
witness,
I
might
add,
and
so
there
is
no
reason
for
anybody
in
that
office
to
see
who
we're
calling
and
what
numbers
we're.
Calling
the
the
bill
is
the
bill.
I
G
A
F
A
Is
the
motion
in
court
just
paying
the
verizon
bill
for
animal
control
what
fiscal
year
we
don't
have
to
keep
doing
this
dance
every
month?
Are
you
okay
with
that
on
the
second?
Okay?
That's
the
roll
call
vote.
Then
it's
the
other
two
are
situate,
or
this
one
instance.
The
other
one
is
is
for
the
entire
year
and
I'm
sure
we'll
come
back
here
and
do
it
again
for
next
year.
E
A
A
E
A
A
D
F
F
F
So
it's
it's
a
very
positive
thing
that
we
ended
up
positive.
If
you
will
a
couple
of
things,
why
it's
a
draft
number
there,
we
there's
a
possibility
of
the
general
fund
increasing
approximately
eighty
thousand
dollars
yet,
and
that
is
due.
We've
had
some
missing
quarterly
grant
reports,
it's
first
time
it's
ever
happened
and
it
happened
right
at
the
time
when
kobet
hit
and
everybody
shut
down
and
changed
how
they
were
doing
business
and
including
the
state.
F
F
F
So
at
this
point
the
the
numbers,
the
positive
numbers,
the
general
fund,
ended
up
about
366,
000,
positive,
the
tort
fund,
626
thousand
dollar
positive
and
the
pension
fund
right
at
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
positive
for
a
combined
total
of
a
million
four
hundred.
Ninety
two
thousand
three
hundred
and
seventy
three
for
the
is
a
change
between
fiscal
year:
nineteen,
the
fiscal
year
20.
F
F
If
you
look
at
the
change
in
those
five
years
and
how
the
draft
number
of
20
is
just
over
11
million
dollar
change
in
fund
balance,
so
the
fund
balance-
and
you
know
the
cash
numbers
we
were
just
talking
about.
You
know
kind
of
closely
correlate
to
why
we
had
the
bar
on
why
we
were
not
having
to
borrow
as
much
and
we're
almost
out
of
the
borrowing
cycle
at
this
point,
so
it's
an
unbelievable
change.
The
combined
total
right
now
is
about
6.5
million
for
the
three
funds.
F
We
have
surpassed
2009,
but
we're
not
back
to
our
original.
If
you
would,
if
you
would
the
original
amount
in
2008
before
the
economic
crisis
and
all
the
other
things
that
happened
in
those
pre-preceding
years,
the
three
total
of
9.6
million,
so
we
still
got
a
little
ways
to
go
to
be
back
to
say
we
were
back
where
we
started,
but
we've
certainly
made
unbelievable
strides
in
the
last
five
years.
So
congratulations
to
committee
and
the
board
and
all
the
department
heads
it's
taken,
a
collective
effort.
F
You
know
to
be
able
to
have
this
conversation
right
now,
the
other.
The
other
thing
I
I
don't
want
to
forget
that
just
hit
me
that
I
have
in
my
notes
for
the
general
fund.
I
definitely
want
to
talk
about
two
things
related
with
covet
and
the
cure
grant.
One
was
the
cost
savings
by
departments,
especially
the
sheriff's
department.
I
included
the
general
fund
comparative
and
its
totals
by
department
that
and
the
cost
saving
efforts
as
well.
F
As
you
know,
you
look
at
things
that
could
impact
the
general
fund
enough
to
for
us
to
be
positive,
the
two
things
that
created
that
were
cost-saving
efforts
and
then
reimbursement
from
the
cure
fund.
So
those
two
were
large
enough
to
impact
and
without
either
one
of
them.
We
would
be
having
a
different
conversation
today
about
how
the
general
fund
ended,
and
then
there
are
also
some
departments
that
the
cure
grant
caused
to
go
over
budget.
F
One
of
the
criteria,
if
you
remember
with
the
cure
grant,
was
it
was
to
be
above
and
beyond
budgeted
information.
You
know
your
original
budget
for
items
to
related
to
covet
and
your
you
know
our
response
to
cobit
and
that
did
create
some
flow
that
caused
some
departments
to
go
over
budget
just
because
of
that
those
transactions.
F
So
it
was
covet
related,
we'll
we'll
correct
that
next
month,
with
the
contingency
above
contingency
budget
adjustment,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
you
know
I
identified
those
as
a
very
important
and
put
that
asterisks
on
there
and
thank
all
the
departments
for
all
the
work
and
adjustment
that
they
did
during
the
year.
So
that's
a
lot
of
information,
I'll,
stop
and
and
answer
any
questions
of
anyone.
Who's
got
anything.
A
A
That
was
new
expense,
but
we
had
had
to
do
those
types
of
things,
but
it
was
also
the
department
heads
and
our
labor
partners
who
helped
us
during
this
situation
by
reducing
expenses
and
working
with
us
going
forward
can't
say
thank
you
enough
who's,
the
team
you
know
and
if
either
wouldn't
have
happened,
we
would
have
went
the
other
direction,
which
is
the
way
most
governmental
units
went
last
year,
so
words
and
music.
Today
it
works
anything
else
for
for
on
this
subject
for
steve.
F
F
F
This
dollar
amount
is
a
very
specific
dollar
amount
associated
with
our
urine
clothes
and
where
we're
at
specifically
so
as
mentioned,
we
have
the
two
what
we
still
owe
highway
and
there
are
two
funds:
the
matching
tax
and
county
bridge
that
total
1.9
million,
and
that
those
are
the
two
amounts
that
we're
in
upon
borrowing.
So
for
those
of
you
that
have
been
on
the
board
a
while
and
lived
through.
F
What
we
went
through
you'll
know
that
the
senate
fund
borrowing
number
was
quite
higher
than
than
1.9
million,
so
we've
it
shrunk
down
to
our
final
two
interfund
borrowing
amounts,
and
hopefully
hopefully
we
can
have
a
discussion
sooner
in
the
coming
years
or
we're
not
having
this
discussion.
I
guess
and
that
we've
ended
it
so
at
this
point,
that
the
the
in
a
fun
borrowing
as
as
of
11
30,
would
be
1.9
million
dollars.
A
We'll
say
that
most
municipal
governments
do
this:
we
just
do
it
openly.
We
list
the
amounts.
Really
it's
true.
We
just
do
it
openly.
There's
almost
everybody
has
to
take
from
the
vacation
fund
to
pay
the
water
bill
at
some
point
you
know
just
like
the
rest
of
everybody
else
when
you're
not
getting
revenue,
and
you
have
to
do
those
things
as
long
as
it's
balanced
at
the
end
of
the
year.
A
A
A
B
A
A
So
we'll
you
know,
we
expect
it
now,
every
year
right!
Okay,
just
let
you
know
what
has
it
been?
How
many
years
in
a
row,
five
in
a
row,
five
in
a
row,
nice
alrighty,
moving
on
treasurer's
office,
mr
africano,
we
have
the
county,
treasurer's
report,
collectors
and
resolutions.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
miss
parker?
Second,
miss
polk.
Let's
do
a
roll
call
please!
Mr.
B
B
I
I
Those
numbers
significantly
dropped,
so
the
number
that
you're
going
to
see
in
the
upper
portion
of
of
change
as
far
as
the
fact
that
we
have
brought
in
less
money
in
the
first
three
months
that
will
that
should
level
out
a
little
bit
as
we
get
into
april
and
the
rest
of
the
year,
because
that's
where
our
number
ended
up
and
that's
where
it's
still
at
so
just
to
give
you
a
heads
up
on
that
number.
Hopefully
I
can
preempt
a
couple
questions
regarding
ice.
J
K
I
So
the
prices
I
got
it
were
all
inclusive.
Oh
so,
oh
yeah,
they
were
they're
all
inclusive
because
we
have
to
have
it
so
hopefully
it'll
be
something
that
this
board
will
see
as
obviously
by
law.
Now
we
have
to
have
it
so
now.
Technically,
in
all
transparency,
we
don't
our
county
is
not
required
to
have
body
cams
until
january
of
2023,
due
to
our
size.
I
H
I
I
You
have
a
he
said.
He
said
he
said
she
said
whatever.
Now
you
have
it
on
video
and
it's
it's
right
there
and
pure
color.
So
I
just
think
it
will
help
us
liability
wise
as
well.
We
already
have
body
cams
in
the
jail,
so
we
already
utilized
those
in
in
inside
the
jail
and
they've
worked
out
very
well
and
just
as
I
said,
they've
protected
our
staff.
I
We
have
not
had
one
issue
where
our
officers
did
something
inappropriate,
but
we've
had
others
where
we've
had
things
that
were
said
that
weren't
accurate.
So
I
think
it's
a
benefit
for
our
staff.
I
think
it's
a
benefit
for
our
community
and
I,
I
think
hopefully
we'll
move
forward
with
it.
The
price
will,
you
know,
tell
us,
you
know
how
far
we
go
so
thank.
K
If
it
were
not
for
the
so
anyway,
we
were
calling
to
take
a
look
at
the
video
and
we
ascertained
that
it
was
justified.
So
you
know
it
kind
of
insures
you
from
some
certain
amount
of
liability
when
you
got
it
black
and
white.
In
color,
as
the
sheriff
has
indicated,
we
as
three
individuals
from
the
naacp
separately
went
in
and
viewed
the
the
you
know
the
video,
so
it
protects
you.
A
I
Well,
the
state's
attorney
obviously
will
want
copies
for
their
cases
as
well
and
foy
under
foia.
Anybody
has
a
right
to
foia
this
information,
so
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that'll
be
a
slow
process
starting
out,
so
we're
not
looking
to
increase
our
staff
yet,
and
that
would
be
more
of
a
probably
a
clerical,
slash
computer
person
who
can
do
that
and
one
thing
that
I
think
this
committee
should
know
as
well
as
the
thousands
that
are
watching.
I
According
to
the
chairman,
you
know
one
of
the
issues
brought
up
with
the
body
cameras
and
you
know
part
of
the
language,
about
officers
being
able
to
review
their
body
camera
footage
while
they're
writing.
The
report,
which
doesn't
this
bill,
doesn't
allow
them
to
do
that.
The
the
reasoning
behind
that
is
because
there
was
some
misinformation
out
there,
that
body
cam
footage,
as
somebody
referred
to
editing
it
earlier.
You
cannot
edit
it
you
can't
edit
it
it's
all
watermarked,
so
you
know
there's
nothing!
I
That's
going
to
happen
to
any
sort
of
body,
cam
footage
as
far
as
editing
or
anything
like
that.
So
you
know
those
are.
But
but
again
we
will
have
to
do
some
redactions
on
certain
things,
whether
it's
faces
or
places
or
whatever
so
that'll
all
factor
into
how
much
we
actually
need
for
personnel
to
do
that.
Sarah.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
sheriff
now
I
don't
know
how
these
things
work,
but
they're
probably
are
they
on
24
7
or
are
they
triggered
when
your
officer
gets
out
of
the
car?
Because
my
concern
is,
I
heard
that
maybe
an
officer
if
the
body
camera
is
not
on
could
face
a
very
stiff
penalty
and
in
the
heat
of
a
moment
I
know
how
things
can
go
sideways,
sometimes
and
in
the
heating
moment
hold
on
wait
a
minute.
Let
me
make
sure
I'm
ron
rhett,
you
know,
make
sure
I'm
filming
it.
You
know.
I
G
G
I
If
he
forgets
to
do
that,
then
there's
some
obviously
some
severe
consequences
that
could
happen.
Yeah
so
yeah
and
the
other
side
of
that
is
is
technology
when
it
works
when
it
doesn't.
If
you're
in
a
foot
chase
and
the
camera
falls
off
or
if
you
you
know,
I
mean
there's
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
make
excuses
for
you
know
people
doing
our
jobs,
but
you
know
those
things
happen
and.
G
I
Well
and
that's
going
to
be
obviously
there's
some
discretion
from
the
state's
attorney's
office,
because
the
state's
attorney
will
be
the
one
charging
whether
or
not
the
officer,
you
know
had
intentions
to
violate
that
part
of
the
new
law.
So
you
know
we
hope
it
doesn't
happen
and
that's
not
our
goal
because
again
it
protects
us
more
than
it
protects
anybody
else
and-
and
I
think
I
know
our
staff
firmly
believes
that
and
and
again
that'll.
I
J
I
I
A
All
right.
Moving
on
to
old
business
asked
to
put
this
on
the
agenda.
This
came
up
out
of
pza
and
dell
will
kind
of
kind
of
give
you
the
amounts
and
everything.
But
basically,
at
one
point:
oh
geez,
a
couple
years
ago,
it
seems
like
we
were
talking
about
demolishing
some
homes
through
a
fema
program
where
they
were
continually
flooded
out
uninhabitable,
but
they're
just
sitting
there
and
there's
federal
money
passed
through
the
state.
A
We
were
unsure
at
that
point
whether
the
state
would
try
to
keep
the
money
or
disperse
it,
or
we
had
enough
money
on
the
front
end
to
outlay
to
have
these
homes
demolished
and
they
have
to
it
lays
fallow
you,
you
can't
build
anything
on
there
again.
It
becomes
basically
riverfront
property
in
that
situation.
That's
open
and
the
county
would
own
it,
but
I
don't
what
was
the
amount
that
we
had
capped
you
at
at
one
time,
250.
A
E
A
And
so
I
thought
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
bring
it
back
to
see
once
we
get
reimbursed
for
this,
and
since
we
started
this,
two
of
the
homes
are
no
longer
available,
correct,
correct
and
so
we're
looking
at
just
another
two
another
two
owned
by
the
same
person
so
right
next
door
to
each
other.
My
thought
was
is
to
get
permission
for
him
to
act
on
the
next
two:
try
to
do
some
economies
of
scale
with
demolition,
while
they're
there
they
can
take
two
houses
down.
A
A
They're
out
by
the
old
tierra
del
mar
skeeters
fisherman's
wharf
17
and
the
bridge
there
that
neighborhood
right
back
in
there
friskies
there,
you
go
yeah,
hey
yeah
bones
just
dated
himself
but
yeah,
the
it's.
Those
homes
are
back
right
on
the
river
back
in
there
right
on
17.
Before
you
get
to
sun
river
terrace.
A
So
if
could
we
relax
the
250
and
say
within
judgment,
within
the
judgment
of
if,
as
long
as
we
get
our
money
back
on
this
one,
which
we
will
it's
a
federal
program
state
can't
sweep
that,
but
we
have
the
cash
flow
to
cover
it,
and
it's
with
steve
on
there
mccarty
as
long
as
we're
not
out
there
waiting
for
a
year
and
a
half
for
our
money,
steve
in
your
opinion,
could
we
handle
that
on
a
short,
throw
basis,
not
right.
Now,
obviously
we
have
to
wait
until
after
july.
Well,.
F
E
I
would
not
think
that
would
be
an
issue.
First
of
all,
we
have
to
demolish
this
one
and
show
proof
that
the
the
parcel
has
been
turned
back
to
to
a
seated
level
parcel.
Then
we
can
turn
in
our
bills
for
reimbursement.
I've
been
told
that
they're
running
about
40
days
from
the
time
we
send
them
the
bills
to
the
time
we
get
a
check
so
and
then,
of
course,
we
have
to
get
things
geared
up
with
title
searches
and
all
of
that
on
the
other
two
part.
F
A
A
Be
in
21.
so
we'll
book
the
we're
crewing
it
through
to
20.
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
what
we
were
doing
there
it'll
it
could
be
marginally
over
250.
It
could
be
260
265
somewhere
in
there.
So
once
we
get
our
money
back,
we're
asking.
Can
we
just
do
the
next
two
properties,
our
estimates,
our
purchase
price
is
going
to
be
somewhat
similar,
so
which
means
we
could
just
go
over
the
250..
So
I
was
hoping
that
the
committee
would
allow
the
discretion
if
it
goes
over
300.
How
about
I
come
back?
A
C
C
I
know
I
understand
what
they
go
through
in
the
office
in
there
we're
trying
to
get
one
done
and
open
another
one
and
get
it
done.
I
just
like
to
it,
since
it
takes
two
years
to
get
it
processed
and
buy
it
and
get
it
set
up
and
demolish
it
and
everything
I'd
like
to
see
the
planning
department
be
able
to
have
you
know
one
being
in
motion
and
the
other
one
being
in
the
paperwork
process.
You
know
the
part,
the
legal
part
of
the
process
so
that
we
always
have
something
happening.
A
E
D
D
A
A
Yes,
and
if
it
does,
you
got
to
come
back
to
finance
and
let
us
know
all
right,
thank
you
and
maybe
give
us
an
update,
or
you
can
tell
me
whenever
that
number
becomes
available,
what
it
is
and
then
we'll,
because
we
have
to
bid
out
the
demo
again
so
it'll
be
completely
transparent.
That's
why
the
full
board
doesn't
need
to
vote
right
now,
because
they
will
then
all
right
good
deal
thanks:
dell
yep
approval
of
the
ida,
strong
communities,
funding
agreement
and
resolution
ben.
Do
you
just
want
to
give
him
a
brief,
intro.
L
Sure,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
So
we
have.
We
passed
the
ability
for
chairman
wheeler
to
sign
a
the
letter
of
commitment
letter
and
at
the
time
we
were
talking
with
mr
coughlin
in
the
state
attorney's
office,
and
we
didn't
want
to
offer
an
omnibus
action
for
the
board,
because
we
hadn't
seen
this
program
funding
agreement.
The
resolution
is
a
very
straightforward
document.
It
basically
says
that
we're
accepting
a
grant,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
appropriate
action
was
taken
on
the
program
plumbing
agreements.
L
We
received
a
700,
sorry
175,
000,
grant
from
ida
for
the
acquisition,
demolition
of
abandoned
properties
within
the
county,
and
this
document
just
outlines
all
of
the
definitions,
requirements
kind
of
of
what
we
would
be
doing,
what
we're
responsible
for
and
then
also
what
ida
is
responsible
for,
as
it
relates
to
the
distribution
of
funds.
You
know
how
we
would
get
requisition
and
things
along
those
lines.
So
there's
a
lot
of
forms
involved
in
this.
L
L
L
Once
we
got
confirmation,
we
received
the
grant,
we
have
to
put
some
priority
items
together
and-
and
I
know
that
you
know-
I
don't
know-
if
pca
will
be
handling-
that
chairman
wheeler
will
give
us
guidance,
but
we're
going
to
have
to
at
the
staff
level,
bring
some
properties
forward.
We
think
of
the
ideal
properties
and
candidates
for
this.
H
L
H
K
A
The
the
the
thought
we
had
was
is
if
we
have
this
175-
and
I
know
dell
because
I've
I've
talked
to
dell
about
this.
I
know
dell
has
a
list
already
of
rural
properties
that
are
abandoned,
nuisance
properties
and
a
few
years
ago,
had
one
like
out
past
quail
hollow
that's
in
the
the
county,
but
the
you
know
they
had
holes
in
the
roof.
A
Kids
were
hanging
out
and
partying
in
there
and
the
swimming
pool
was
a
mosquito
factory
and
we
actually
had
some
board
members
go
out
there
and
board
the
place
up
and
just
try
to
fix
it.
So
people
can
go
in
there
like
a
volunteer
thing.
So
this
would
address
those
types
of
properties,
but
it
also
would
be
money
that
the
land
bank
could
use
to
acquire
properties
and
then
get
them
rehabbed
and
back
on
the
tax
rolls.
So
the
the
purview
that
the
land
bank
would
have
would
be
obviously
kankakee
in
the
rural
areas.
A
But
that's
why
we
want
other
communities
to
join
it
because
then
they
can
they.
They
would
get
home
rule
powers
on
these
abandoned
properties
and
we
don't
have
to
wait
two
years
for
some
bank
in
texas
that
thinks
they
have
a
500
000
house
when
it's
squatters
living
there.
You
know
what
I
mean
it's
it's
there's
we're
able
to
move
on
stuff,
really
quickly,
that's
the
benefit
of
a
land
bank
and
why
I
was
so
passionate
about
it.
A
We'd
love
to
be
able
to
do
that,
bradley
and
bourbon
and
everywhere
else
that
they'll
have
us.
I
would
say:
okay.
Well,
I
guess
we
need
a
motion
on
that.
I
would
I
would
guess
this
allows
the
this
is
the
executing
agreement.
We
voted
in
mr
payton
with
the
motion.
Second,
miss
weber.
I
will
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Can
we
with
no
more
questions?
B
A
Thank
you,
I'm
wrestling
with
something
here.
I'm
just
gonna
go
ahead
and
say
it
because
I'm
getting
calls
from
employees
and
department
heads
asking
the
the
our
auditor
has
have.
Has
another
audit
request
where
the
basic
demand
is
employee,
social
security
numbers
again,
and
it's
because
there
was
some
kind
of
a
report
of
fraud.
A
Okay,
so
there's
two
things
that
that
aren't
gonna
happen,
we're
just
not
gonna
handle
our
employees
and
their
dependents
and
their
spouses
and
social
security
numbers.
People
are
allowed
to
do
audits,
but
they
have
to
sample
things
and
they
can't
just
have
everybody's
number.
So
we
we
do
that
as
part
of
our
outside
audit.
Every
year
on
payroll,
they
say,
give
me
pull
these
10
people.
I
want
to
see
their
their
payroll,
but
inside
the
payroll
system
is
all
their
dependents
information.
A
A
Okay,
that
is
solely
the
job
of
the
sheriff
in
the
case,
if
they're
being
investigated,
the
state
police
and
then
there's
limited
roles
of
the
state's
attorney,
so
I
don't
care
what
anybody
says:
they
have
no
authority
in
the
auditor's
office
to
investigate
fraud.
Okay,
that
is
not
their
job
by
statute
of
the
state
of
illinois.
A
A
A
It's
problematic
what's
going
on,
and
it's
not
us
that
are
the
bullies.
It
never
has
been.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
again
and
then
I'm
not
going
to
talk
about
this
again.
I'm
done.
Okay,
so
I
had
to
say
that
for
the
employees
I
had,
I
had
to
say
that
for
the
employees,
because
they're
really
worried
yeah
and
we
have
an
obligation
to
protect
their
personal
information.