►
Description
Planning, Zoning & Agriculture Committee Meeting 6/17/2020 9:00 AM
A
A
C
D
E
B
E
A
B
B
B
G
B
A
A
A
H
H
Permit
I
have
been
inspected
by
the
Illinois
EPA
air
and
water
divisions,
the
Kankakee
Soil
and
Water
Conservation,
the
Kankakee
County
Health
Department,
the
Illinois
State
Police,
the
Kankakee
County
Sheriff's
Police,
the
limestone
Fire
Department,
the
Kankakee
County
Highway
Department,
the
limestone
township
road
commissioner
and
the
Buckeye
pipeline.
Every
one
of
these
agencies
have
inspected
what
the
complaints
they
were
brought
to,
my
property
for
and
some
of
them
multiple
times
and
at
one
time
has
there
been
a
violation
or
a
ticket
written.
H
The
Illinois
EPA
has
given
me
suggestions
to
consider
to
reduce
the
neighbor
complaints
and
to
date,
I
have
followed
every
one
of
them.
Asphaltene,
the
first
400
foot
of
my
entrance
installing
bit
max
material
on
the
driveway
that
is
gravel
that
reduced
the
dust
installing
a
water
system
on
the
crushing
equipment,
planting
750,
evergreen
trees
to
have
a
natural
vegetation
border
between
the
neighbors
and
I,
and
now
working
with
the
county
to
become
compliant
for
the
business
that
we
do.
I
have
approached
the
county,
not
the
other
way
around.
H
There
are
countless
businesses
operating
within
a
few
miles
of
my
property
that
are
not
zoned
correctly,
and
some
of
them
have
operated
for
dozens
of
years.
I'm,
really
not
sure
how
you
fix
that
fairly.
The
business
that
I
built
for
the
last
14
years
on
this
property
has
become
a
need
in
our
community
I'm,
trying
very
hard
to
offer
a
service
and
yet
be
respectful
as
possible
to
my
neighbors.
This
is
why
I
want
to
become
compliant
with
the
Kankakee
County
I.
Believe,
if
you
listen
to
the
facts
of
this
case,
you
will
see.
H
A
I
I
A
J
J
Represent
mr.
and
mrs.
Larry
Scheffer,
the
owners
of
the
property
located
at
274,
South,
5,000,
W
road,
Kankakee,
Illinois
I,
understand
that
this
is
just
public
comment,
so
I'll
keep
it
to
that.
I.
Do
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
today,
as
we
know,
there's
a
request
for
a
two
variations:
the
property
for
the
property
situated.
It's
that
I
haven't
described
as
section
17
of
limestone
township
I
think
we're
all
familiar
with
the
property
at
issue.
Here.
J
I'm
particularly
focused
on
the
request
for
special
use
in
my
comments
for
the
special
use
permit,
and
we
think
it
should
be
declined
and
I
just
want
to
go
over
without
again
public
comment.
Just
what's
I
see
strictly
what's
in
the
record,
based
on
the
testimony
of
the
petitioner
and
based
on
the
testimony
of
the
several
property
owners.
So
I
say
this
for
about
proximately
three
years
the
property
at
issue
has
been
used
as
an
industrial
cement,
crushing
facility.
You
know,
make
no
mistake
about
it.
J
The
Zoning
Board
voted
three
to
three,
as
you
know,
regarding
machiners
application
again
based
on
public
comments
here,
we
think
the
vote
really
should
have
been
six
to
nothing.
It's
cleared
that,
based
on
the
testimony
at
public
hearing
that
150
trucks,
according
to
the
petitioner,
now
enter
an
exit
in
a
minimum
on
this
property
and
we're
talking
about
semi
traffic
truck
the
trucks
come
and
go
and
on
the
weekends.
J
Despite
there's
some
debate
about
that,
but
despite
you
know
whether
it's
weekends
or
not,
and
despite
the
petitioners,
attempts
to
keep
dust
from
kicking
up
dust
continues
to
kick
up.
There
were
pictures
presented
at
the
hearing.
The
trucks
make
noise
in
an
otherwise
really
an
otherwise
country
setting.
J
It
is
clear,
as
that
the
neighbors
all
the
neighbors
who
testify
the
complaint
of
loud
noises,
vibrations
from
the
petitioners
activities
on
the
property,
there's
burning
of
material,
that's
happening,
the
petitioner
uses
front
loader
tractors
to
dump
the
cement
in
the
semi
trailers,
making
loud
noises
dump
trucks
come
in
dumping
and
picking
up
various.
You
know
cement
pieces
for
crushing
this
constant
dust
and
smoke
and
noise
from
the
activities
of
petitioners
business.
As
I
mentioned,
the
trucks
are
loud,
the
local
roads.
J
We
don't
see
any
right
to
use
the
local
roads
for
this
type
of
industrial
traffic.
All
of
this
information,
as
I
mentioned,
is
contained
in
the
record
before
the
planning
zoning
board.
The
petitioners
request
for
a
special
use
permit
should
not
be
granted
for
two
reasons.
First,
the
petitioner
really
did
not
provide
any
evidence
at
the
Zoning
Board
hearing
that
the
property
and
the
you
know
the
use.
J
The
high
industrial
impact
can
meet
the
standards
for
the
issuance
of
a
special
use
permit
and,
quite
honestly,
the
record
reveals
that
the
that
they
can't
meet
it
unequivocally.
The
standards
cannot
be
met
and
without
belaboring.
It
I
think
you
all
know
what
the
standards
are,
and
there
are
several
the
establishment,
maintenance
or
operation
of
the
special
use
will
not
be
detrimental
or
endanger
the
public,
health,
safety,
morals,
comfort
or
general
welfare.
J
To
the
contrary,
it
does
endanger
public
health,
safety,
morals,
comfort
in
general,
welfare,
the
property
owner
and
all
the
adjacent
property
owners
to
the
petitioners.
Property
all
testified
again
that
there's
a
hundred
and
fifty
weekly
parade
of
semi
trucks
kicking
up
dust
dirt.
Creating
noise
smoke,
it's
a
public
nuisance
in
an
agricultural
country,
style
atmosphere.
The
parks
are,
you
know
the
trucks
park,
sometimes
on
the
roadway,
the
roadways
being
torn
up
as
I
mentioned.
A
J
Item
one
second,
that
special
use
will
not
be
injurious
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
other
property
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
I
think
it's
been
a
clearly
proved
that
it
will
there's
been
testimony
that
dust
collects
on
people's
houses
from
the
I.
Don't
know
within
the
dust.
No
one
knows
what's
in
the
dust
and
even
if
it's
not
harmful,
it's
still,
you
know
emanating
from
the
use
of
the
petitioners
property.
It's
a
heavy
industrial
cement,
crushing
business.
The
noise
is
her
end,
based
on
the
record
the
dust
from
the
cement
crushing
operations.
J
J
Somebody
testified
that
the
the
trucks
were
all
dust
ends
up
on
their
house
plants
or
grass
or
driveways,
etc,
and
somebody
also
testified
one
of
the
neighbors
that
they
can't
even
open
up
their
windows
when
these
operations
are
going
on
and
again
I
mentioned
this,
because
it's
all
in
the
record
3,
the
establishment
of
the
special
useful,
substantially
impede
the
normally
normal,
orderly
development
and
improvement
of
Stronach
property.
No
person's
gonna
ever
want
to
develop
any
property
next
to
this
type
of
use.
J
That
I
really
think
that
if
you,
if
you
have
a
buyer
or
homeowner
that
wants
to
buy
one
of
the
neighbor's
property,
it's
just
it
I
think
they're
gonna,
look
at
this
type
of
use
and
just
there's
no
there's
just
no
wedding.
The
adequate
of
utilities,
actress
access,
road
drainage
or
necessary
facilities
have
been,
or
will
be,
provided
again,
focusing
on
the
roadways
if
they're
just
not
made
nor
allowed
for
this
type
of
heavy
duty.
Industrial
type
of
business,
adequate
measures
have
been
will
be
taken
to
provide
ingress
and
ingress.
I
think
I've
already
mentioned.
J
Why
that
it's
not
happening
so
I
won't
belabor
that
point
and
finally
number
six
that
the
special
use
permit,
in
all
other
respects,
conforms
the
applicant
applicable
regulations
of
the
district
in
which
it
is
located
and
that's
not
at
all
clear
from
the
record.
The
petitioner
claims
that
the
EPA
is
passed
on
the
use
of
the
property,
the
pollution,
the
noise,
diesel
pollution
truck
traffic,
the
only
Testament.
The
only
evidence
of
that
is
the
petitioners
testimony.
J
We
don't
know
if
there's
a
safety
hazard
to
the
other
homeowners
or
other
adjacent
homeowners
who
are
not
even
aware
of
the
application
for
this
special
use
permit.
So,
in
the
end,
as
I
think
clearly,
the
petitioner
cannot
meet
the
standard
for
the
issuance
of
a
special
use
permit
as
I've
outlined
the
blob,
even
if
it
was
a
close
call.
It's
not
the
negative
impact
to
the
adjacent
neighbors
is
so
great
that
the
request
should
be
denied
in
really.
J
K
A
A
K
L
Morning,
my
name
is
Brian
Scott
and
I
represent
the
petitioner
in
VBA
case
1915
Ron
Sallie
O'connor,
on
behalf
of
municipal
bank
Trust
2583.
My
client
has
been
a
local
businessman
in
this
county
for
over
35
years.
He
supports
the
local
economy
and
other
local
businesses
that
would
otherwise
end
their
money
outside
Kankakee
County
for
the
services
he
provide
at
the
location
of
his
business.
This
business,
while
located
in
areas
zoned
a1,
is
located
along
a
street
with
at
least
two
other
businesses
that
are
non
agricultural
related.
L
One
is
an
auto
body
shop,
the
other
apparently
fabricated,
storage,
tanks
for
a
variety
of
purposes.
My
client,
after
opening
his
business
and
working
with
the
I
EPA
and
the
EPA
learned
he
should
ensure
his
business,
was
properly
zoned
and
undertook
this
process
with
the
desire
to
ensure
he
legally
operate
the
business.
During
this
time
he
has
worked
to
be
a
good
neighbor
by
attempting
to
REM,
be
neighbor
concerns
and
his
people
along
the
way
throughout
this
process.
All
he's
wanted
is
a
fair
process
that
has
reviewed
back
to
grant
him
the
thought.
L
A
for
special
use
permit
to
operate
a
heavy
processing
facility
in
this
location
as
permitted
under
the
a1
zoning
ordinance.
My
client
has
acknowledged
such
a
state
long
way
during
this
process.
These
mistakes
are
a
far
cry
from
the
many
false
accusations
and
baseless
claims
made
by
some
venting
from
obtaining
this
permit.
My
client
continues
to
work
hard
to
ensure
a
minimally
intrusive
on
his
neighbor's,
while
working
at
his
business,
as
evidenced
by
the
conditions
he
has
volunteered
life
on
himself
with
painless.
Permit,
never
left
as
you
listen
to
concerns
raised
by
neighbors.
L
L
The
facts,
which
include
letters
from
Road,
commissioner
and
Fire
Department
and
others
in
this
case,
should
be
closely
scrutinized
to
come
to
the
conclusion.
If
my
client
wants
to
operate
a
legally
permissible
business
under
the
zoning
ordinances,
it
specifically
the
a1
zoning
ordinance
with
conditions
to
ensure
he
does
not
offend
his
neighbor's.
He
would
like
to
continue
to
operate
wofully
under
both
state
and
federal
law
to
ensure
both
his
livelihood
and
the
businesses
in
the
area
that
rely
on
him.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Thank.
A
M
B
A
A
D
The
building
report
for
May
of
2020
we
issued
94
permits
with
a
valuation
of
4.9
million
dollars,
three
of
those
were
new
homes
and
brought
in
total
revenue
of
thirty-seven
thousand
nine
hundred
and
one
dollars,
which
was
a
very
good
month
for
us.
That's
almost
double
what
we
brought
in
in
May
of
last
year,
if
you
factor
out
the
large
CSL
bearing
permit
that
was
issued
last
May.
I
I
M
B
M
A
D
D
Since
the
Zoning
Board
was
unable
to
make
a
recommendation
on
this
case,
staff
made
some
recommendations
for
or
some
recommended,
findings
and
some
conditions
on
it
for
you
to
consider,
and
it's
totally
up
to
the
board
whether
they
would
like
to
accept
these.
It's
certainly
write
your
own
or
come
up
with
your
own
under
finding
number
one,
which
is
that
the
establishment,
maintenance
or
operation
with
special
use
will
not
be
detrimental
to
or
endanger
the
public,
health,
safety,
morals,
comfort
or
general
welfare.
D
Taken
from
the
discussions
from
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals,
they
found
that
it
will
not
be
detrimental
to
the
health,
safety,
morals,
comfort
or
general
welfare,
but
the
testimony
did
indicate
that
property
owners
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
operation
may
be
affected
by
dust
emanating
from
trucks
entering
and
leaving
the
the
property.
So
the
following
two
conditions
were
placed
on
a
1.
The
operation
must
maintain
all
required
permits
from
the
IE
EPA,
Kankakee,
County
and
other
agencies
at
all
times,
including
a
valid
loss
permit
and
must
comply
with
all
directives
issued
by
the
iepa.
D
Keep
in
mind
it's
if
I
didn't
go
through
the
testimony.
One
of
the
suggestions
by
the
iepa
to
minimize
dust
was
the
application
of
a
bit
max
spelled
bit
max
material
to
the
driveway,
and
mr.
O'connor
did
paid
the
first
400
feet
of
the
driveway
to
keep
dust
out.
So
that
was
one
of
those
type
of
directives,
and
he
did
he
did
do
both
of
those.
In
fact
that
was
all
done
before
he
even
applied
for
a
special
use
permit.
D
Secondly,
limiting
the
location
on
the
property
where
this
can
occur.
The
processing
and
storage
of
materials
is
limited
to
that.
Well,
should
be.
The
processing
of
materials
is
limited
to
the
rear,
1,000
feet
of
the
property
and
the
storage
of
materials
will
be
allowed
in
the
rear,
1,500
feet
of
the
property.
A
D
Well,
those
two
conditions
there.
Those
are
the
conditions
that
Mister
failing
was
talking
about.
That's
two
of
them
on
the
second
finding
there
are
four
conditions:
hours
of
operation
for
processing
and
shipping
and
receiving
at
the
facility
shall
be
Monday
through
Friday
from
8
a.m.
to
5
p.m.
and
Saturday
from
8
a.m.
to
2
p.m.
D
can
be
processed.
Only
used,
concrete,
brick
rocks
uncontaminated
soils
play
or
similar
similar
materials
in
accordance
with
the
ordinance
related
to
the
special
use.
Permit
shall
be
accepted
at
a
facility
for
processing
so
that
limits
them
to
just
what
they
are
currently
doing.
Open
burning
shall
be
permitted
on
the
rear,
1500
feet
of
the
property
and
a
speed
limit
of
10
miles
per
hour
shall
be
imposed
on
all
vehicles
operating
on
the
property.
It
will
be
placed
along
the
driveway
indicating
the
speed
limit.
So
that's
for
more
conditions,
all
of
them.
D
Okay,
we're
still
going
there's
six
kinds
of
fact
and
there's
conditions
on
at
least
four
okay.
I
think
this
might
be
the
last
one
under
finding
the
number
for
the
property
owner
shall
cause
a
drainage
study
of
the
property
to
be
conducted
at
their
expense
to
evaluate
the
effects
of
elevating
the
property
has
had
on
the
surrounding
nature.
This
study
shall
be
completed
within
24
months
of
approval
to
special
use
and
any
improvements
or
changes
to
drainage
shall
be
completed
within
24
months
of
the
date
of
the
completed
study
at
the
owner's
expense.
D
A
A
D
That's
where,
in
the
beginning
about
two
weeks
ago,
I
sent
all
of
you
a
large
packet
I
think
Kelly
did
actually
I
didn't
do
it
went
out
to
you,
which
had
all
of
the
evidence
all
of
the
testimony
the
transcripts
and
basically
everything
I
am
on
this
case.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
you
had
plenty
of
time
to
review
it.
So
you
have
all
of
that.
You
have
it
with
you.
You
can
follow
along
we'll
be
going
over
some
of
that.
D
D
Currently,
the
property
is
used
for
the
recycling
of
used,
concrete,
concrete
is
crushed
into
gravel
and
Reba.
The
rebar
is
removed
and
recycled.
They
also
recycle
soil
in
clay,
it's
screened
to
remove,
rocks
and
other
foreign
materials,
and
then
we
soil
and
clay
is
sold
as
polarized
dirt.
I,
don't
know
what
they
pulverized
the
clay.
The
facility
has
been
operating
without
approval
for
a
couple
of
years
now
and
mr.
O'conner
came
to
us
stating
that
he
wanted
to
be
legal.
What
did
he
need
to
do
to
make
that
happen?
D
Okay,
it's
a
33
point:
H
5
acre
parcel
its
own
a1
agriculture.
It's
located
on
the
west
side
of
an
siting.
Road
in
limestone
Township
recycling
operation
occurs
to
the
rear
of
the
property,
a
large,
almost
20,000
square
foot.
Pole
barn,
sits
at
the
front
of
the
property.
There
are
several
buses
located
on
the
property
and
we
have
notified
the
owner
that
he
is
not
applying
for
a
junkyard.
The
buses
must
be
removed.
D
There
are
several
shipping
containers
located
on
the
rear
of
the
property
and
he
also
uses
the
property
for
agricultural
purposes
by
raising
bees
and
pumpkins
on
the
property
and
I
have
witnessed
at
least
the
bees.
I
have
not
witnessed
pumpkins,
but
when
I
was
out
there
doing
my
site
visit,
there
are
beehives
on
the
property.
D
D
D
D
D
D
Zba
did
not
make
a
recommendation,
so
there
are
two
choices
for
this
committee.
You
can
make
a
recommendation
to
the
county
board
yourselves
and
develop
your
own
findings
effect
or
you
could
send
it
back
to
zba.
That
is
the
choice
of
the
committee.
I
tell
you,
there's
probably
no
guarantee
he
would
get
any
different
outcome
from
CBA
by
sending
it
back
pertinent.
Testimony.
D
Burnin
testimony
on
the
case,
one
of
the
objections
is
that
there's
been
open,
burning
occurring
on
the
property
and
the
objectors
have
alluded
to
that
and
stated
that
the
fire
department
had
been
called
out
on
several
occasions.
If
you
look
in
your
packet,
exhibit
II
is
a
letter
from
the
fire
chief
stating
that
there
have
been
no
costs
of
the
property
that
have
indicated
any
illegal
burning,
all
of
their
all
of
their
calls.
D
Either
burning
has
occurred
within
the
legal
parameters
that
you
are
allowed
to
burn
with
one
one
incident
where
there
was
an
accidental
burning
one
of
the
buses
caught
fire
I
believe
it
was
lightning
strike
either.
Alignment
is
right
for
somebody
just
remember
loss,
but
anyway
it
was
determined
that
that
was
accidental.
D
D
His
evidence
for
burning
on
the
property,
what
seeing
which
one
offhand
right
now,
but
that
was
part
of
Exhibit
B
that
he
mr.
Schaefer.
Similarly
going
back
to
this
now,
mr.
O'connor
contends
that
the
burning
on
the
property
consisted
of
landscape
waste,
generated
from
the
property
and
he's
within
the
law
to
burn
this
waste,
which,
if
that
is
true,
he
is.
You
can
burn
waste.
That
is
just
a
landscape
waste
that
is
generated
from
your
own
property,
providing
you're
not
doing
it
within
a
thousand
feet
of
a
municipality.
D
D
Open
burning
something's,
not
right,
I
apologize
for
this.
This
is
a
little.
Let's
go
to
dust.
Various
photos,
especially
an
exhibit
B,
show
that
dust
is
present
during
the
operation
of
the
facility
to
counteract
this.
As
I
said,
Mr
O'connor
has
paved
the
front
portion
of
the
driveway
and
installed
bit
max
on
the
remainder
for
IEP
age
recommendation.
D
Went
over
the
road
issues,
Fire
Department
issues,
we
already
tell
fire
department
issues.
Continued
objectors
also
stated
that
they
believe
trucks
waiting
to
enter
the
property
are
blocking
access
to
the
limestone
Township
Fire
Department,
which
is
about
a
quarter
mile
north
of
this
site.
Also
in
that
letter
from
the
fire
treaty
states
that
this
is
not
an
issue
for
them.
D
Drainage
and
storm
water
issues,
objectives,
belief,
site,
improvements
to
the
property,
have
caused
flooding
and
storm
water
issues.
Mr.
O'connor
has
done
some
billing
and
some
site
improvements
on
the
property
without
a
stormwater
permit,
you
not
get
a
stormwater
permit,
which
is
required
by
it
from
our
office.
One
of
those
activities,
which
is
why
there's
a
a
condition
on
the
property,
are
on
the
approval
to
do
one
after
the
fact.
D
Basically,
a
drainage
study
would
be
performed
and
he
would
need
to
make
any
improvements
to
alleviate
any
draining
issues
that
are
discovered
if
there
are
any
they
have.
Objectives
have
provided
photos
of
standing
water,
but
the
source
of
that
water
is
inconclusive.
There
are
a
fair
number
of
natural
wetlands
in
the
area
and
the
stream
very
well
be
photos
of
those
neighborhood
land
use.
Objectors
have
contended
that
the
neighborhood
is
a
residential
area
area,
zoned,
a-one
agriculture.
D
D
The
operation
has
a
valid
Ross
permit,
which
is
a
regulation
of
smaller
sources
from
the
I
EPA
that
permit
had
its
monitored.
There
are
inspections
that
occur,
I
do
not
work
for
the
IE
EPA,
but
I
have
not
seen
any
any
reports
that
anything
has
been
found
out
there.
That
would
be
a
big
hazard
and
outside
of
the
guidelines
of
the
Ross
permit.
D
Plenty
of
exhibits
on
this
on
this
case
we
went
all
the
way
to
our,
which
is
very
unusual
for
us
there's
a
list
of
all
of
the
exhibits
and
all
of
those
were
were
distributed
to
you
about
two
weeks
ago.
I
can
go
through
some
of
the
pictures
you
know
put
them
up
on
the
screen.
Exhibit
B
was
several
boards
with
photographs
on
it,
showing
trucks
entering
leaving
the
property
dust
on
the
property
and
some
general
photos
of
the
property
and
I'll
just
slowly
scroll.
Through
these,
give
you
guys
an
idea
to
look
at
them.
D
D
There's
a
board
that
shows
some
liquid
trucks
that
entered
the
property
and
unloaded
mr.
O'connor
testified
that
that
was
water
to
water.
His
pumpkins,
the
lower
pictures
show
the
standing
water
across
the
street,
which
is
also
a
natural
wetland,
so,
as
I
said
and
I
said,
before
it's
inconclusive
as
to
whether
that
water
has
anything
to
do
with
mr.
O'connor's
operation,
or
that
is
just
a
natural
occurring
situation
there,
they
show
pictures
of
degradation
in
the
roadway.
D
The
township
road
Commissioner
does
not
seem
to
have
any
issues
with
how
the
roadway
is
being
utilized.
There's
some
more
pictures
of
drugs,
Exhibit
B
here
this
is
photos
of
some
of
the
files
in
Iowa
concrete
waiting
to
be
crushed,
there's
a
pile
of
playing
dirt
on
the
left,
the
middle
picture
on
the
top
as
the
photos
of
the
buses
as
I
said,
those
need
to
be
moved
and
some
other
general
pictures
of
the
operation.
D
D
D
D
These
are
pictures
of
a
nursing
home
in
the
city
of
Kankakee
that
was
demolished
and
the
concrete
was
taking
out
taken
out
to
that
site
for
processing
I
think
some
of
the
bridge
team.
Possibly
they
did
have
the
proper
permits
from
the
Aeta
to
do
that,
and
the
truckloads
were
tested
for
contaminants,
and
now
we
get
to
the
findings.
D
I
did
not
have
a
slide
of
every
exhibit
up
there,
because
some
of
them
just
such
as
the
letters
did
not
bode
well
for
putting
it
on
the
screen
and
I
think
that
you
can
just
read
those
yourself
from
your
packet.
So
that's
why?
There's?
Not
all
all
of
the
exhibits
were
on
my
screen
getting
to
the
findings.
I
already
read
the
first
finding
earlier
when
you
were
making
a
motion,
but
so
I.
Won't
we
do
that
one,
but
that
is
for
establishment,
maintenance
and
operation
of
the
special
use
suggested.
D
Finding
number
two
number
twos
finding
that,
and
these
are
the
standards
that
the
special
use
will
not
be
injurious
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
the
other
of
other
property
in
the
immediate
vicinity
for
the
purposes
already
permitted,
nor
substantially
diminish
or
impair
of
property
values
within
the
neighbourhood.
Finding,
for
that
is
the
board,
finds
the
subject
property
in
the
area
surrounding
the
subject.
D
Suggested
fining
number
three
that
the
establishment
of
the
special
use
will
not
substantially
impede
the
normal
and
orderly
development.
Improvements
of
the
surrounding
property
for
use
is
permitted
in
the
district.
The
answer
to
that
is
the
board
finds
of
the
subject:
property
and
the
area
surrounding
the
subject.
Property
is
zoned,
a1
agriculture.
The
board
further,
finds
that
the
development
and
surrounding
properties
for
agricultural
purposes
and
uses
permitted
within
the
agricultural
district
will
not
be
impeded
by
the
establishment
of
the
special
use
permit.
D
Number
four
that
adequate
utility
access,
roads,
drainage
or
necessary
facilities
have
been
or
will
be,
provided
the
Board
finds
that
all
utilities
needed
to
operate
the
facility
have
been
provided,
and
then
an
access,
road
or
driveway
has
been
provided
to
access
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
board
further
finds
that
there
are
no
identified
drainage
issues
on
the
property.
However,
the
property
may
have
been
elevated
over
time
through
the
use
of
fill
which
may
have
cause
an
adverse
effect
on
the
drainage
in
the
area
in
general.
D
D
Number
five
is
that
adequate
measures
have
been
or
will
be
taken
to
provide
ingress
or
egress
so
design
as
to
minimize
traffic
congestion
in
the
public
streets
board,
finds
that
the
owner
has
provided
a
33
foot
wide
entrance
at
Van,
siding
Road
to
accommodate
truck
movements
into
the
facility
and
that
an
access
road
has
been
established
on
the
property.
The
board
also
finds
that
this
access
road
has
been
paid
for
the
first
400
feet
and
if
it
max
dust,
control
is
used
on
the
remainder
of
the
access
road.
D
The
board,
by
further
finds
that
the
township
road
Commissioner
has
provided
a
written
statement
in
the
form
of
a
letter
indicating
the
truck
traffic
to
and
from
the
facility
has
not
been
an
issue
for
the
road
network
and
number
six.
The
special
use
will,
in
all
other
respects,
conform
to
the
applicable
regulations
of
the
district
in
which
it
is
located,
except,
as
such
regulations
may,
in
each
instance,
be
modified
by
the
board.
The
board
finds
that
the
applicant
is
not
seeking
any
variation
to
the
county.
Zoning
regulations
in
regard
to
this
request.
D
The
board
further
finds
the
special
use
permit
will
comply
with
all
aspects
of
the
county,
county,
zoning
ordinance
and
all
conditions
placed
upon
the
special
use
permit.
The
board
also
finds
that
the
conditions
placed
on
the
special
use
permit
will
require
the
special
use
permit
to
be
in
compliance
with
regulations
beyond
those
imposed
by
the
zoning
ordinance
and
those
are
the
findings
and
that's
my
presentation.
Thank.
A
You
del
we'll
start
off.
We
have
the
motion
in
the
second,
so
we'll
have
questions
for
del
about
any
of
this,
of
their
unique
clarification
on
the
the
evidence
that
was
presented,
and
you
see
that.
But
do
we
obviously
I
want
to
draw
attention
the
fact
that
we
need
to
consider
evidence
and
not
hearsay
so
to
the
board
any
questions
to
del.
A
A
For
good,
okay,
sorry
about
that,
we
had
some
internal
stuff
in
the
room
here
we
had
to
fix
so
with
the
original
person
who
made
the
motion.
Is
that
acceptable
with
the
as
the
motion
is
originally
presented?
What
mr.
Barr,
is
that
acceptable
with
you
that
that
becomes
the
motion?
Yes,
okay,
so
then
we
won't
have
to
do
an
amendment.
It
will
just
that's
your
restating
your
motion,
including
those
recommendations.
A
K
G
Building
that
may
or
may
not
be
complete.
It
must
be
that
nineteen
thousand
five
hundred
square
foot
building
that
must
have
been
built
in
the
last
year
too.
I
noticed
that
it
came
before
this
CBA
Committee
first
time
in
December.
On
what
basis
was
that
building
built?
Was
it
for
agricultural
purposes
or
how
was
it
stated
and
what
design
code
was
used?
What
it
was
approved?
It's.
D
D
D
D
Are
suggested
by
me
for
your
consideration,
since
the
Zoning
Board
did
not
make
findings
either.
The
planning
and
zoning
committee
needs
to
make
their
own
findings
or
send
it
back
to
the
Zoning
Board
for
them
to
make
findings
I,
don't
think
sending
it
back.
The
Zoning
Board
is
going
to
get
a
much
of
a
a
better
result.
So
to
help
planning
and
zoning
committee.
I
suggested
findings.
You
by
all
means
can
change
them
any
way
you
see
fit.
It
was
just
a
starting
point
for
you
guys
to
start
with
the.
N
N
D
D
D
N
D
A
D
D
D
F
D
I
know
of
the
property
is
that
former
owners
have
used
it
for
various
uses
that
involve
be
moving
of
dirt,
possibly
the
dirt
rock
some
possibly
similar
to
this.
It
has
been
used
for
other
that
tight
odd
for
the
dumping
of
dirt
gravel,
concrete
things
of
that
nature,
and
that
probably
goes
back
at
least
50
years.
A
D
Is
correct
if
all
of
the
conditions
are
not
met
and
maintained,
the
county
board
can
pull
the
special
use
permit,
which
means
if
he
does
not
keep
a
valid
Ross
permit,
then
the
he
is
in
jeopardy
of
losing
his
special
use.
Permit
I
would
assume
that
if
something
were
to
occur,
where
the
Ross
permit
was
in
jeopardy,
that
the
county
board
would
give
him
time
to
correct
it,
just
like
the
Ross
permit
would.
But
yes,
all
those
conditions
that
are
placed
on
it
must
be
met
at
all
times.
F
F
D
D
D
G
This
is
probably
one
of
the
hardest
votes
and
one
of
the
hardest
decisions
that
I've
made
since
my
time
on
this
board
and
because
I'm
a
strong
property
rights
individual
and
believe
that
the
owner
of
property
should
have
the
right
to
move
forward
in
the
direction
that
he
can
go
and
as
long
as
he
doesn't
negatively
impact
and
impede
the
neighbors.
This
property
news
getting
active
while
houses
were
built
on
the
surrounding
property,
I
drilled,
the
property
and
looked
at
mr.
G
Connors,
not
a
very
nice
job,
but
that
question
unit
sets
within
500
feet
of
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
house
is
too
quick.
Yes,
I
just
saw
it
through
the
bushes
there's
houses
on
all
sides,
the
houses
of
it
were
there
long
before
he
ever
started
using
this
property
for
that
purpose,
and
so
my
vote
would
be
not
to
grant
the
special
use
permit
for
the
very
reasons
that
Mister
screaming
horns.
G
F
F
A
person
who
believes
in
the
property
rights
of
owners
to
be
able
to
make
a
living
off
of
what
they
own,
but
I
do
also
believe
that
the
proximity
to
all
of
these
residences
that
obviously
existed
long
before
current
use
of
that
property
existed,
it
risk
their
health
and
safety
I.
Think
because
of
the
dust
we
don't
know
what
to
make
concrete.
We
don't
know
what
is
in
the
other
construction
material
and
we're
going
to
put
this
dust
in
the
air
the
office.
Also.
The
other
thing
that
bothers
me
is
the
water
run
up.
D
A
D
A
No
okay
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
disagreeing
with
your
comments.
I
just
want
to
get
that
on
the
record
it
has
there
been
in
the
evidence
submitted.
Was
there
any
evidence?
I
didn't
see
it
that
documented
any
I.
Don't
know
chemicals
in
the
water
or
in
the
land,
or
anything
like
that.
Any
of
the
documents
that
were
submitted,
I
didn't.
N
G
Yes,
oh
yeah,
yeah
sure
when
I
was
went
by
that
I
couldn't
take
the
liberty
of
getting
out
of
my
vehicle.
The
doors
were
open.
There
was
no
floorboard
I
think
that
the
building
is
not
complete.
It's
just
the
shell
and
I
would
stake.
My
recommendation
on
mr.
skimmer
horns
report
that
it's
1,600
feet
away.
The
pressure
has
got
to
be
closer
than
that
to
the
one
house,
but
that
does
not
complete
to
my
house
anything.
F
N
D
Now
to
the
left,
yeah
actually
yeah,
that
is
just
dirt
I-
think
mr.
O'connor
actually
turned
some
of
these
trucks
around
down
there.
That
is
a
neighboring
property
owned
by
someone
else.
I
do
not
know
their
name.
I
do
know
that
they
came
in
a
few
years
ago
for
a
pole,
barn
for
a
tree
nursery
I
believe
that
that
property's
used
as
a
tree
nursery.
M
No
I,
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me.
I
don't
have
my
desk
here.
Do
you
tell
us
some
of
the
special
uses
that
are
allowed
into
an
agricultural
district
that
if
someone
builds
a
house
and
on
the
farm
land
or
on
a
piece
of
property
out
in
residential
area,
all
the
different
types
of
things
that
could
be
built
next
door?
Well
sure.
D
It's
not
a
residential
area,
it's
an
agricultural
area,
but
yes,
give
me
just
one
moment.
Also.
If
you
follow
up
on
mr.
Fairfield's
question
about
the
pole
bar
and
the
palm
bar
is
completed,
the
building
permit
has
been
closed
on
it.
It
has
a
dirt
floor
inside
I
was
in
the
Bulldog.
It
is
virtually
sitting
there
empty
right
now.
There
were
some
pallets
of
I
believe
seed
or
fertilizer
sitting
inside
there.
D
M
D
Consider
the
use
is
considered
to
be
somewhat
compatible
with
agriculture.
Yes,
reason:
it's
a
spent
was
compatible
with
agriculture.
It's
a
permitted
use
especially
uses
because
it's
somewhat
compatible
in
most
cases.
Ninety
percent
of
the
time
they
offer
they
can
operate
without
any
issues,
but
because
there
may
be
issues,
it's
a
special
use
permit
which
allows
the
board
to
scrutinize
the
specifics
of
that
particular
use
and
also
allows
the
board
to
put
conditions
on
it
in
case
there
are
issues
that
arise
that
they
can
mitigate.
D
If
you
have
a
negative
issue
and
you
can
impose
a
condition
to
turn
it
into
a
positive
issue,
that's
what
you
would
do
with
a
special
use
permit.
So
if
you
look
at
the
proposed
findings
and
the
proposed
conditions,
dust
may
be
a
problem.
So
one
of
the
things
you
do
is:
how
can
we
alleviate
that
issue?
We
put
conditions
on
it
that
he
must
have
a
slow
speed
limit
on
the
property.
You
know,
yeah,
we
pretty
much
federal
operation
and
things
of
that
nature
to
alleviate
those
issues.
D
M
And
if
someone
somewhere
wages
a
complaint
against
the
special
use
permit
property?
What
would
that
comes
back?
Forty
I'm
sorry
I
did
not
give
me
if
someone
wages,
a
complaint
to
you
to
your
office
about
the
property
mm-hmm
require
a
questionable,
a
questioned
by
the
pga
or
their
zoning
board
of
appeals
to
respond
to.
If.
D
Someone
complains
about
an
issue
on
the
property.
Yes,
I
would
not
necessarily
take
that
to
be
za.
I
would
look
to
see
if
they
are
in
violation
or
not
okay.
If
they
are,
then
the
appropriate
tickets
would
be
issued.
Okay,
thank
you.
I
would
bring
it
to
PGA
if
County
Board,
if
we
needed
to
revoke
the
special
use
permit,
that's.
D
I
heard
at
some
point
time
they
continued
to
business
that
had
been
long-running
there
by
the
previous
owner.
Can
you
confirm
that
you
have
information
on
that?
As
far
as
I
know,
this
particular
business
was
started
by
the
O'connor
family,
but
the
property
may
have
been
used
for
similar
or
other
types
of
uses.
That
would
be
along
these
lines
for
several
decades,
so
that
didn't
just
pop
up
overnight
with
the
O'connor's,
the
core
stone,
maybe
I
do
not
have
that
kind
of
history
on
it.
A
All
righty
well
just
as
a
member
of
the
committee
and
I'm
running
it
for
John
today,
but
as
a
member
I
appreciate
the
comments
and
the
thoughts
everybody
had,
I
have
I
think
they
with
thee.
The
changes
at
Delbert
has
has
recommended
of
this
committee.
It
addressed
everything
that
I
had
questions
about,
and
some
things
I
didn't
really
consider
so
I'm,
supportive,
I,
just
I
think
it
meets
all
findings
of
fact
in
every
case,
so
especially
since
this
use
has
been
going
on
for
a
while.
It's
the
it's
known.
A
What
has
been
there
and
what
construction
use
has
been
going
on
at
that
and
I
the
the
owner
has
come
forward
and
trying
to
get
the
proper
zoning
rather
than
us,
pushing
him
into
this
process.
So
those
are
the
two
things
that
were
outstanding
in
my
head.
That
I
have
been
know
had
been
solved
by
the
findings
of
fact.
Any
other
thoughts
comments.
A
N
A
M
M
N
I
F
B
A
D
D
All
right,
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
our
acres
from
a1
agriculture
to
re
rural
estate,
located
on
9,000
North
Road,
the
south
side
of
the
village
of
Grant
Park.
In
fact,
if
you
look
at
the
map
there,
that
green
kind
of
a
olive
green
area
is
the
village
of
grant
parks
limits,
Jason
and
Sarah
Stenhouse
Valley.
Let
me
back
up
Harry
and
Deborah
Stan
House
on
24
acres.
This
is
the
larger
parcel.
D
They
have
a
home
on
there
that
they
live
in
and
then
there's
a
mobile
home,
Jason
and
Sarah
Stenhouse
lived
then
Jason
and
Sarah
would
like
to
have
their
own
properties
yet
still
live
close
to
there
close
to
the
parents
so
that
they
can
take
care
of
them.
So
they
would
like
to
rezone
the
four
acres
outlined
in
red
on
this
map
to
rural
estate
so
that
they
could
build
their
own
home
there,
but
you
got
to
still
be
next
door.
D
The
parents,
the
mobile
home,
would
be
removed
from
the
remaining
twenty
acre
site
to
accomplish
this.
Maybe
not!
That
parcel
also
does
not
meet
the
driveway
spacing
requirements
which
our
ordinance,
which
allows
for
one
driveway
for
every
330
feet
of
frontage.
Unfortunately,
the
parents
driveway
already
has
taken
that,
so
they
are
also
requesting
a
variance
for
driveway
spacing
to
allow
another
draw
way
along
9,000
North,
Road,
Zoning
Board
heard
this
case
on
June
8th
and
voted
five
to
zero
to
recommend
its
approval.
A
H
K
A
I
G
D
Mr.
Barton
would
like
to
buy
this
property
from
Michael
and
Anne
Wyatt
and
build
his
home
on
it.
It's
10
acres
its
own
day,
one
agricultural
currently,
which
our
ordinance,
which
requires
20
acres
to
build
a
home.
So
in
order
to
accomplish
this,
it
needs
to
be
zone
3
zone
2
a
to
agriculture
which
would
allow
the
building
of
a
home
on
a
10
acre,
parcel
Zoning
Board
heard
the
case.
D
Part
of
the
testimony
was
given
is
that
this
is
marginal
farmland
at
best
and
should
be
used
for
residential
purposes,
whereas
as
an
agricultural
purposes,
I
do
believe
that
mr.
Burton
testified
that
the
back
portion
of
the
10
acres
may
still
be
farmed
by
a
neighboring
farmer.
Zoning
Board
heard
the
case
on
June
8th
as
well,
and
they
also
voted
5
to
0
to
recommend
the
approval
of
this
one.
O
B
A
A
D
The
mom
ice
cream
back
over
you
don't
mind.
This
is
a
minor
subdivision
request
our
doctor
Slutsky,
who
owns
a
former
detention
pond
in
Riverside
Country,
Estates,
first
edition,
as
as
a
platted
detention
pond,
that
parcel
is
unbuildable
as
it
is
set
aside
and
designated
as
any
pension.
Not
it
has
not
been
used
as
it
as
a
detention
pond.
D
There
is
a
storm
sewer
line
put
in
to
help
drain
the
subdivision
along
the
north
side
of
the
lot,
and
this
plat
does
recognize
that
with
a
20-foot
storm
sewer
easement
along
the
north
property
line
allow
access
for
repairs.
Milk
of
that
as
the
progress
is
privately-owned,
even
though
it's
a
Claddagh
to
the
detention
pond
that
is
privately
owned
by
mr.
smudski
or
dr.
splints.
The
excuse
me
and
he
would
like
to
make
the
parcel
biblical
I
believe,
possibly
for
sale
or
incorporation
into
his
home,
that
he
he
lives
next
door
to
this
mr.
D
A
D
Note,
mr.
chairman,
that
this
went
out
for
a
45-day
review
and
all
surrounding
property
owners
were
notified
and
we
had
no
comments
of
any
of
any
substance
received.
The
only
comment
we
had
was
from
County
senator
mark
Rogers
at
County
Highway.
He
reminded
us
that
we
needed
to
put
have
that
storm
sewer
easement
on
the
plant,
which
has
been
corrected
so.
D
G
Yes,
sir
I've
developed
a
few
subdivisions
and
engineering
love
decree
retention
ponds
and
take
massive
areas
of
property
for
detention
ponds.
This
is
the
first
one
that
I've
ever
heard
where
they
want
to
take
back
a
detention
pond
and
make
it
a
buildable
lot,
I'd
like
to
know
what
changed
and
why
we
don't
need
to
detention
find
anymore.
D
Mr.
Tyson
handle
that,
if
you
don't
Dave,
it
was
designated
as
a
detention
pond
originally
when
they
only
was
original
developer
of
this,
and
that's
why
it
was
saved
or
held
at
that
time.
It
never
was
developed
into
a
detention
pond.
The
company
required
it.
The
only
thing
the
county
did
do
is
I
believe
it's
about
six
years
ago
they
put
a
new
storm,
so
we're
along
the
north
side
of
this
land
to
convey
the
water
from
both
Riverside
country
estates,
a
portion
of
that
and
also
Riverside
country
estates.
G
D
G
D
Business
way,
mr.
Kinzinger,
for
quite
a
few
years
there
was
a
water
problem
along
the
first
edition
of
Riverside
Country
Estates,
and
that
was
corrected
by
the
county
and
a
big
drainage
project
that
was
done,
like
I,
said
by
I
think
is
five
years
ago
might
be
longer
to
take
care
of
that.
The
water
is
always
released
in
the
same
direction
and
it's
being
released
right
now
and
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
any
problems
or
any
complaints
about
that.
Thank.
N
M
D
The
way
it
works,
I
mean
I,
lived
out
in
that
subdivision
for
about
15
years,
and
that's
that's
what
happens?
Is
the
road
ditches
do
fill
up
on
Brill
heavy
rains
since
there's
the
the
culverts
and
the
roads
have
been
restricted?
Basically,
the
water
sits
in
the
ditches
for
a
period
of
time
and
then
they
drains
away.
There
was
a
problem
where
it
wasn't
draining
away
and
that's
when
they
put
this
larger
culvert
and
some
new
catch
basins
on
the
north
side
of
what
is
the
proposal.
Hablan
de
river
side,
country
estates,
third
edition,
so.
N
C
Just
have
a
statement,
mr.
chairman,
yes,
last
night,
ivory
actually
received
a
call
from
someone
out
in
diverse
attack
and
there
is
a
detention
pond
out
there
that
is
not
being
maintained,
its
own
private
privately
and
it's
not
being
maintained
in
his
house
this
year.
He
did
contact
dull
about
it,
who
recommended
he
contact
the
owner
and
the
owner
doesn't
really
see
a
need
to
do
anything
to
help
the
situation
out.
The
detention
pond
there
also
when
it
gets
full
floods
on
to
the
manteno
Golf
Course.
C
So
it's
not
even
doing
you
know
it's
its
job
there.
So
you
know
my
comment
and
is
possibly
if
we
take
this
detention
pond
away
from
this
subdivision,
and
there
are
problems
down
the
line
there,
there's
no
going
back
to
get
the
property
back
to
get
the
detention
pond
in
to
alleviate
any
future
problems.
So
that's
just
my
statement,
so
I
think
that
the
property
should
be
maintained
for
a
detention.
A
E
D
A
You
I'm
sorry
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
it's
it's
never
been
a
pond.
It
was
just
put
on
the
paper
that
it
was
a
pond
and
there
are
no
flooding
issues
as
it
stands
right
now
on
that
area
and
anything
that
was
there
was
solved
by
drainage
on
the
other
side
of
the
road
that
was
installed
by
the
county.
D
It
was
solved
by
the
drainage
on
the
other
side
of
the
road,
as
well
as
a
as
a
storm
sewer
that
was
put
along
the
north
side,
his
properties,
that's
why
mr.
Rogers
wanted
to
have
a
20
foot
easement,
we
had
admit
we
had
a
10
foot
easement
in
there.
He
wanted
a
20
foot
easement
for
maintenance
reason,
so
we
changed
it
from
senator
20
I,
see
so.
A
C
I
M
F
B
F
M
O
Then
I'm
here,
sir,
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
I
guess
one
of
them
may
be
the
previous
CBA
meeting
or
maybe
a
County
Board
meeting
chairman
wheeler
had
alluded
to
some
of
the
programs.
We
look
into
at
the
staff
level
and
I've
got
a
couple
that
came
up
that
aren't
necessarily
programs
that
the
county
would
apply
for,
but
I
want
the
members
of
the
committee
in
the
board
to
be
aware
of
anyway.
O
It's
kind
of
we
work
towards
digital
under
the
federal
commerce,
commission,
there's
something
called
lifeline
and
it's
a
it's
individual
application
to
to
lifeline
program
under
the
under
USAC
and
that
allows
an
individual
user
to
be
discounted
up
to
it's
like
$10
per
month
for
telco
services.
So
if
you've
got
internet
services
or
cell
phone
services,
depending
on
whether
you
qualify
under
the
program,
any
individual
can
can
try
and
apply
it's
just
it's
a
very
simple,
so
I'll
send
a
like
a
quick
summary
of
these
to
chairman
wheeler.
O
So
we
can
distribute
to
all
of
you.
Have
you
got
any
residents?
You
want
to
share
it
with
it's
a
great
opportunity
if
they
qualify
to
get
a
little
bit
savings,
the
other
one
that
came
through
from
Department
of
Commerce
on
the
fourteenth.
We
get
a
new
mailer
from
the
the
team
of
regional
economic
development
team,
I
apologize.
O
The
payment
protection
program
through
SBA
still
has
one
hundred
and
thirty
billion
dollars
in
it,
applications
are
still
in
qualifying.
Applications
will
be
taken
through
June
30th,
so
again
any
businesses.
You
know
that,
are
you
know
that
are
meeting
of
funds.
You
know
we're
trying
to
it's
their
responsibility
as
an
individual
business
to
apply
the
SBA.
It's
not
something
we
would
handle
it
the
county
level,
but
just
keep
it
in
mind.
There's
still
plenty
of
funds
left
on
that
program.
O
From
kind
of
the
Alliance
side,
we've
got
a
new
dialogue
with
EDA
surrounding
the
comprehensive
economic
development
strategy.
Our
economic
development
strategy
expired
in
2019,
so
we're
looking
for
a
funding
mechanism
and
funding
opportunity
with
EDA
under
some
of
their
new
economic
assessment
programming.
So
we
will
be
likely
the
the
fiscal
agent
for
this
one
is
the
responsible
entity
to
look
for
funds
for
updating
our
five-year
economic
development
strategy
for
the
for
the
entire
county
and
really
the
region.
O
That's
all
I
have,
as
far
as
an
update
just
for
kind
of
a
an
informal
update
that
we've
the
there's
a
pleasure
of
the
committee.
We
can
move
on
to
the
rural
transit
update.
I've
got
them
new
numbers
for
our
third
quarter,
a
little
over
ten
thousand
trips
and
what's
really
cool
about
those
ten
thousand.
O
But
everybody
should
know
we
received
a
grant
about
two
years
ago
for
bus
shelters
or
that
commuter
out
that
that
6,500
users
are
using
each
corner.
We've
received
a
new
type
manual,
so
we're
moving
forward
in
the
procurement
steps
to
get
a
bus,
shelter
placed
in
the
village
of
moments
and
in
Sun
River
Terrace
that
will
tie
into
the
shelters
in
downtown
Kankakee
here
at
the
proposed
transfer
station
site.
So
they'll
be
a
little
little
warmer,
a
little
drier
before
for
users
to
use
it
on
those
days
that
are
a
little
more
inclement
and
then.
O
So
we've
got
just
kind
of
an
update,
just
this
is
for
the
public
that
you
know
if
anybody
needs
to
know
commuter
trip
is
$2
roundtrip,
so
anybody
that's
commuting
for
the
moments'
line
and
we
run
for
a
to
5:00
p.m.
and
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
get
back
forth
to
work
running
every
day
and
then
the
demand
rides
demand
response
rights
so
that
could
be
from
a
location.
You
you
define
to
any
location
you
go
within
the
county,
which
is
traditional.
Transit
service.
Are
four
dollars
a
ride.
O
A
O
So
on
Friday,
chairman
wheeler,
mr.
Rogers
and
I
had
a
call
with
with
mr.
Gonzalez
Roy
pure
who's,
our
government
affairs
contact
and
Maureen
Powell
who's
kind
of
our
our
front
person
for
for
outreach
from
CSL.
They
still
have
some
landscaping
to
be
done
at
the
entrance,
but
the
lighting
is
up
and
operational.
O
The
guard
tower
is
up
and
installed
and
they've
been
utilizing
that
that
entrance
exit,
so
that
will
be
for
public
and
private
entry,
so
for
well
when
most
COBIT,
when,
when
the
facilities
and
taking
visitors,
all
visitor
injuries
to
CSL
will
be
happening
through
that
meeting
happening
to
that
main
entrance
and
they
will
still
utilize
the
existing
entrance
off
of
Harbor
Road.
So
there
David
I,
don't
want
to
say
exponentially,
but
they've
streamlined
their
exits
for
their
employees,
and
this
is
a
big
boon.
O
If
you
work
there,
you're
not
sitting
in
20
20
minutes
half
hour
trying
to
get
out
of
your
your
job
every
day.
So
that's
that's
up
and
running
it's
what
it
needs
to
be.
You
know,
obviously,
as
the
project
comes
to
a
conclusion,
we'll
do
a
little
land
skill
with
a
we'll.
Do
a
little
landscaping
out
out
there
and
bring
it
up
a
little
bit,
but
it's
a
it's
an
awesome
project
that
took
a
good
bit
of
heavy
lifting,
maybe
maybe
some
more
for
heavy
lifting
that
should
have.
A
O
A
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
the
other
way
around.
Well,
we'll
verify
that
cuz
they
haven't
officially
opened
it,
but
I
believe
what
they
wanted
to
do
is
have
visitors
go
in
the
other
way,
and
then
employees
just
use
that
entrance
or
both
employees
use
both.
But
visitors
only
go
to
one
so
yeah.
Well,
we
don't
want
to
definitely
misrepresent
that
so
we'll
clarify
to
get
it
back
to
you.
A
The
other
thing
was:
is
we
we've
been
working
with
the
high
dot
District
three
on
the
armored
Road
route,
50
intersection
and
The
Associated
improvements
to
put
traffic
lights
up
where
the
stop
signs
are
by
the
entrance
of
Denny
there
and
time
all
that,
and
so
we
don't
have
any
real
updates.
It's
in
Phase
three
engineering,
which
is
basically
the
the
funding
and
jurisdiction
side
of
this
bourbon.
A
A
Township
is
going
to
take
jurisdiction
of
that
stretch
of
road
there,
the
sponsoring
entity,
if
you
will,
but
it's
still
CSS,
obviously
still
in
the
county,
so
that
is
moving
forward
at
a
glacial
pace,
but
once
it
does
hit,
it
will
be
fast
and
and
really
moving
quickly,
potentially
to
link
up
with
the
bridge
project
that
is
down
the
street
from
there.
That
goes
over
the
railroad
tracks
heading
west,
so
you
know
we,
we
use
the
joke,
pull
the
band-aid
off
all
at
once.
A
A
Just
that's
still
moving
forward,
it's
just
once
once
it
hits
it
will
hit
and
everybody's
pushing
hard
to
get
that
done.
We've
been
given
eight
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
this
project
in
the
capital
bill.
That
was
a
hard
work
by
a
lot
of
people,
get
it
in
there
and
we're
appreciative,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
when
the
time
comes
that
were
able
to
take
advantage,
so
I
just
want
to
update
the
Committee
on
those
two
things,
because
those
are
two
big
planning
issues
also
Hopkins
Park.
A
O
Yes,
so
it
relates
the
project
we're
when
we
talk
to
a
couple
times
about
this
about
several
phases
of
the
project.
It's
our
intention
at
the
staff
level,
with
the
Chairman's
signature
to
submit
a
grant
application
to
Department
of
Commerce
for
what
we're
calling
in
phase
one
so
that
would
be
about
440
homes
could
receive
direct
service.
I
know
that
senator
Joyce
had
announced
previously.
He
received
a
million
dollars
capital
appropriation
for
for
this
project.
O
The
intent
for
that
we
have
four
active
bills:
two
in
the
house
and
two
in
the
Senate,
as
those
move
through
senator
Joyce's,
indicated
he's
attempting
to
get
the
Senate
bill
on
veto
session,
but
either
way
we'll
be
going
we'll,
be
shooting
for
either
veto
session
or
the
102nd
General
Assembly
to
take
action
to
fully
flush
out
that
project
and
make
it.
You
know
the
maximum
opportunity
for
the
region,
but
this
allows
us
to
get.
O
You
know
continue
the
momentum
get
the
project
moving,
get
the
main
main
line
installed,
while
then
flushing
out
exactly
how
the
details
of
the
further
reaching
of
the
project
work.
So
it's
it's
moving.
Pretty
fast,
we've
got
13
days.
We've
got
pretty
much
the
pieces
we
need.
I
actually
have
another
nikkor
call
today,
with
kind
of
our
point
lead
on
infrastructure,
development
and
she's.
Gonna.
Give
me
a
final
update
from
there
and
on
final
costs
and
a
couple
mapping
pieces,
I,
I
know
this.
O
Isn't
the
Finance
Committee,
but
I
do
want
to
give
a
big
things
to
both
Steve
and
Chris
in
the
finance
department.
I
I
asked
him
for
something
yesterday
and
by
8:30
this
morning
it
was
in
my
email.
I
mean
they're
they're
really
quickly
turning
things
around
for
us,
so
we
can
get
it
done
and
I
not
that
I
wouldn't
expect
them
to
do
that.
But
I
really
certainly
appreciate
it.
Yeah.
A
This
is
this:
grant.
Opportunity
is
not
just
a
little
bit
it's
a
five
billion
dollar
ceiling,
I
believe
and
yes
in
the
billion
dollar
senator
Joyce
had
set
aside
was
to
get
it
from
the
main
into
the
homes
and
the
conversion
into
the
homes.
I
believe
that
was
the
the
way
that
was
laid
out.
So
we
it's
not
enough
to
bris
bring
the
pipeline
into
Hopkins
Park,
you
have
to
get
it
to
the
homes,
then
you
also
have
to
have
customers
and
that's
another
thing,
that's
being
worked
out
by
nikkor.
A
So
all
in
all
you
know
this.
This
first
step
is
the
grant
opportunity
that
could
happen
potentially
before
a
veto
session
when
the
Senate
bills
start
going
through.
So
I,
don't
to
say
it's
an
insurance
policy.
It
is
something
that
couldn't
in
fact
be
our
best
bet
to
get
phase
one
done
and
totally
paid
for
that
it
meets
all
the
rubrics
that
has
qualifies
it
to
be
a
major
project.
A
I
think
everybody
wants
this
to
happen,
and
now
it's
a
it's
a
statewide
initiative
because
there's
other
areas
I
believe
east
peoria
is
one
of
them
where
they
want
to
do
something
similar
to
take
natural
gas
to
underserved
areas.
So,
thanks
to
Ben
for
just
birddog
in
this
and
he's
got
a
lot
of
work
between
now
in
the
end
of
the
month.
A
I
just
wanted
the
committee
to
know,
because
this
falls
under
our
planning
department
a
little
bit,
and
sometimes
you
don't
get
all
the
the
detail,
the
details,
how
the
sausage
is
made,
so
to
speak,
so
just
so
he's
able
to
you
can
call
him
directly
and
he
can
fill
you
in
on
any
details
as
we
go
through
this
anything
been
anything
else.
Mr.
cap,
yes,
mr.
feather
Lee
I'd.
A
They're
too
primal
development
projects
and
you're
welcome
it's
it's
something
that
well
it's
long
overdue
and
it's
by
the
trying
to
get
something
done
for
10
years
and
I
I
can't
thank.
We
wouldn't
be
anywhere
without
senator
Joyce.
On
this
we
have
just
banging
our
fist
on
the
table.
He's
actually
made
it
happen
and
he
deserves
a
lot
of
the
credit
for
the
Hopkins
Park,
getting
it
to
the
point
of
being
fun
and
Lindsay
Parkhurst
as
well.
Putting
her
bill
into
the
house
they're
working
together
as
a
team
and
those
bills
mirror
each
other.
A
A
A
One
opening
on
GBA
three
openings
on
the
Regional
Planning
Commission.
If
you
know
anybody
who
would
want
to
be
part
of
this
group,
they
are
the
I
want
to
say
the
vetting
arm
of
the
County
Board.
They
look
at
new
projects
when
things
need
to
be
updated,
I
want
to
say,
try
to
think
of
something
real.
You
know
when
we
need
to
update
our
solid
waste
plan,
which
probably
has
to
be
coming
up
here
soon,
though
I
would
imagine
I
think
we
have
to
do
it
like
every
five
years.
Well,
actually,
that's
changed.
A
All
right,
but
it's
things
like
that
to
be
doing
work,
to
make
bring
things
and
make
recommendations
of
the
county
board
based
on
things
that
come
before
them,
so
it's
kind
of
a
fun
committee.
If
you
know
anybody
who
wants
to
be
part
of
that,
please
tell
them
to
reach
out
or
send
them
an
application.
Kelly
can
get
you
the
app
to
be
on
it.
I
think
Chad
you're!
Still
on
that
correct!
Yes,.
E
A
It's
it's
community
based,
you
know
it's
it's
people
out
from
all
corners
of
the
community.
We
can
use
any
any
input
we
can
get
well.
At
least
three
spots,
chorim's
become
an
issue.
So
that's
why
we
need
to
make
sure
that
it's
a
full
full
house
so
and
then
also
we
have
one
opening
on
the
gis
committee
for
a
county
board
member.
If
you
know
a
guy
or
gal
as
they
say,
please,
let
us
know
we
need
to
get
that
spot
filled.
It's
been
it's
been
about
six
months,
so
I
need
a
board
member.
A
Otherwise,
if
you
don't
show
up
to
a
meeting
I'll
appoint
you
that's
the
way
it
works.
So
beyond
that
any
any
other
comments
under
new
business.
Is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn?
Oh
ho,
that's
who
was
a
motion
for
a
mr.
Frank?
Second
by
mr.
long,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
oh,
how
about
a
roll
call?
Oh
yeah,
yeah
John.