►
From YouTube: Climate Protection Steering Committee - June 30. 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
As
was
just
noted
today,
six
cons,
six
conservative,
idealistic
members
of
the
united
states
supreme
court
eliminated
what
has
been
one
of
the
widely
recognized
one
of
the
most
powerful
tools
of
the
federal
government
to
regulate
pollutions
that
exacerbate
the
climate
crisis
and
that
including
myself
like
so
many.
Our
community
has
a
lot
of
folks
feeling
a
loss
of
hope.
B
I
remain
hopeful
and
others
do
as
well,
partly
because
most
because,
while
that
is
one
important
tool,
it
does
not
touch
on
another
important
tool,
and
that
is
the
role
of
states
and
specifically
the
jurisdictions
within
them.
Cities,
counties
local
governments,
trustees
of
local
communities
to
take
action
and
lead
the
way
in
forging
a
just
transition
to
a
better
energy
economy,
clean
energy
future.
Where
all
can
thrive,
and
I
think
the
process
that
this
committee
has
undertaken
the
way
it
was
carried
out
by
this
city.
B
A
C
E
On
my
community's
account,
whatever
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
that
happened,
but
I
just
want
to
take
the
opportunity
to
say
this:
is
this
is
adam
rossi?
I
live
in
the
third
district,
but
yeah
mostly
just
wanted
to
echo
billy
and
say.
Thank
you
so
much
for
to
the
committee
to
everyone.
Who's
attended
these
meetings.
All
the
public
who's
made
comments
and
gotten
this
thing
to
this
stage.
E
I
think
this
is
yeah
like
exactly
what
billy
said.
It
gives
me
a
lot
of
hope
that
that
kansas
city
can
come
together,
community
and
and
get
this
point,
but
let's
get
this
thing
passed
and
and
let's
keep
keep
fighting
the
good
fight
because
yeah,
as
others
have
already
highlighted,
you
know
it's
it's
it's
an
everyday
thing.
We
haven't
arrived
by
any
means,
so
we
have
to
keep
up,
keep
up
the
effort,
but
thank
you
for
everyone's
effort
on
this
committee.
So
far,
I
really
appreciate
the
hard
work.
A
A
And
I,
along
with
the
rest
of
the
members
of
climate
protection
steering
committee,
look
forward
to
having
those
conversations
pushing
for
those
changes
and
programs
and
policies
and
ultimately
making
kansas
city
the
more
sustainable
place
that
we
all
know
it
is
capable
of
and
must
be
for
ourselves
and
for
future
generations.
So
robin
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
F
F
I
really
appreciate
everyone's
hard
work
on
this
from
the
staff
to
the
consultants
to
our
environmental
justice
workers
to
the
countless
hours
the
committee
has
spent
and
and
all
the
members
of
the
public
who
have
have
supported
and
pushed
for
a
strong
plan
the
whole
way.
So
I
do
feel
thankful
that
we
are
at
this
point
today,
given
the
news
we
got
from
the
supreme
court
this
morning.
F
G
This
is
michael,
this
is
ellen,
I
mean
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
take
the
motion
and
let
me
talk
or
not
I'm
going
to
abstain
again,
but
I
haven't
want
to.
You
know,
of
course,
have
a
couple
comments
to
read
into
the
record
as
well.
So
if
you
want
that
now
or
if
you
prefer
to
take
the
motion
and
get
it
second
and
get
it
on
the
table,
that's
up
to
you.
G
However,
I
do
want
to
go
on
record
that
energy
is
very
supportive
of
many
of
the
provisions
of
the
plan,
and
you
know
the
ultimate
carbon
neutral
goal
for
the
city.
Energy
is
a
key
implementer
and
partner
for
the
city,
and
we
look
forward
to
continuing
the
dialogue
and
helping
the
city
obtain
its
carbon
goals
as
we
pursue
our
own
carbon
neutral
goals
by
2045..
G
Shutting
hawthorne
is
not
feasible
by
2025.
The
importance
of
hawthorne
plays
to
the
overall
grid.
Reliability
of
the
transmission
system
makes
it
technologically
and
practically
it's
not
feasible
in
the
short
term.
It's
a
long
process
to
address
the
transmission
issues
around
closing
hawthorne
to
address
this
issue.
It
takes
significant
studies,
applications
approvals
by
the
southwest
power
pole
and
the
state
regulators
and
then,
of
course,
construction,
and
all
of
that
is
a
you
know.
Roughly,
you
know
six
plus
year
process.
G
I
think
it's
you
know
suggested
by
me
at
an
earlier
meeting.
Intervening
and
energies
resource
makes
decisions
is
best
addressed
in
the
state
regulatory
process,
and
I
was
glad
to
see
that
the
committee
has
included.
That
is
one
of
the
top
priorities
in
the
energy
supply
section.
So
I
think
that
that
would
be
very
good
and
way
for
the
city
to
be
heard,
as
it
relates
to
resource
planning.
G
Everyday
is
committed
to
reducing
carbon
emissions,
70
percent
from
2005
levels
by
2030
across
our
whole
fleet,
but
we
don't
think
all
coal
is
feasible
in
that
time
frame,
while
preserving
reliability
and
affordability.
Specific
plant
closures
will
be
addressed
in
our
irp
process,
which
includes
robust
scenario,
analysis
around
reliability,
affordability
and
sustainability.
To
determine
timing.
Around
specific,
you
know,
plant
closures
I
did
on
also
want
to
mention
that
the
supreme
court
decision
today
will
not
change
our
focus
on
achieving
our
70
reduction
targets
by
2030
and
our
carbon
neutral
goals
for
2020.
C
Yeah,
I
kind
of
want
to
that's
kind
of
what
the
same
thing
that
we
brought
up
and
kind
of
piggybacks
on
stuff
that
that
cheryl
or
shirley-
and
I
both
brought
up
concerning
this-
and
that
was
what,
like,
I
said,
a
feasible
plan
to
actually
do
this,
because
the
electrical
grid
in
the
united
states-
and
so
it's
that's
kind
of
what
we're
talking
about
we're
all
for
that,
as
well
too,
with
the
ibw.
But
at
the
same
time
it
has
to
be
done
responsibly
and
and
realistically
as
well
too.
A
I
don't
think
it
would
be
fair
to
allow
yeah
so
okay,
so
with
all
of
that
being
said
by
members
of
the
committee,
if
there
aren't
any
other
objections
or
additional
comments
that
need
to
be
made,
I
I
will
make
a
motion
for
climate
protection
steering
committee
to
formally
endorse
this
draft
of
the
climate
protection
and
resiliency
plan
and
send
it
to
the
city
council
for
consideration.
Can
I
get
a
second.
A
D
F
F
H
So
we
shared
that
back
when
we
sent
the
meeting
announcement
out
so
happy
to
entertain
any
comments
you
might
have
to
that.
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
approved
by
the
steering
committee.
But
if
you
have
any
suggestions
happy
to
take
those
and
or
you
know
you
can
send
them
to
us
later,
if
you
want
to
do
that
plus,
I
know
robin
you
have
a
letter
that
you
wanted
to
share
with
the
steering
committee
to
formally
kind
of
document
your
endorsement
for
the
plan,
so
that,
however,
you
want
to
do
this.
F
H
So,
just
to
kind
of
give
a
little
bit
of
a
briefing
about
this
resolution.
It's
not
particularly
lengthy,
but
I
think
it
gets
to
the
point
of
what
we're
trying
to
do,
and
so
just
as
resolutions
will
often
have
your,
whereas
clauses
you'll
see
marley.
Can
you
just
scroll,
I
guess
down
there,
you
go
you'll,
have
your
standard,
whereas
clauses
where
we're
going
to
recognize
many
of
the
past
resolutions,
ordinances
that
the
city
has
passed
over
the
past
several
years,
going
back
to
2008
when
the
original
plan
was
adopted.
H
H
So
mayor
mayor
kelly,
has
asked,
as
well
as
tom
jacobs
they've,
been
meeting
with
other
cities
to
try
to
kind
of
gather
those
endorsements
for
the
regional
plan,
and
we
felt
that
it
was
appropriate
to
do
so
in
this
case
as
well.
So
those
are
the
three
top
things
that
we
were
asking
for
in
this
resolution.
I'm
just
kind
of
want
to
put
it
out
there
if
people
have
thoughts,
concerns
happy
to
entertain
those.
A
I
one
small
suggestion
I
wanted
to
see
if
I
could
add
in
with
the
list
of
ordinances
or
resolutions,
I
just
wanted
to
suggest
the
inclusion
of
ordinance
two
one:
zero,
nine,
six,
six-
that
ordinance
directed
city
staff
to
develop
a
plan
for
the
installation
of
protected
bike
lanes
throughout
the
city,
seeing
as
how
protected
bike
lanes
are
identified
as
one
of
the
yes
thank
you.
Laura
was
identified
as
one
of
the
strategies
under
the
transportation
piece.
I
This
is
kristen,
and
I
wonder
andy
if
this
wouldn't
be
the
right
place
to
also
state
something
about
the
importance
of
equity
as
part
of
this,
because
we
have
identified
that
the
people
likely
to
suffer
the
most,
if
you
will,
under
the
extreme
temperatures
driven
by
climate
change,
are
the
people
that
have
been
historically
oppressed
and
that
that
we
really
want
to
draw
the
the
council's
attention
to
this
as
an
opportunity
for
to.
In
some
sense
I
don't
know
if
make
amends
is
not
the
right
word.
I
H
H
We
like
to
share
the
fun,
but
no
absolutely
that's
a
great
idea
and-
and
it's
inherent
in
some
of
the
ordinances
resolutions
are
already
in
the,
whereas
clauses.
But
what
are
the
likelihood
that
council's
going
to
go
back
and
look
at
those
specific
ones?
So
that's
why
we
were
sort
of
focusing
on
the
climate
emergency
resolution
a
little
bit,
because
there
is
some
language
in
there
on
the
equity
as
well,
so
but
yeah.
If
you
want
to
help
me
with
that,
we'd
appreciate
that.
I
H
J
I
H
F
K
A
Taking
a
motion
on
this,
since
this
is
kind
of
we
already
go,
but
I
mean
if,
if
folks
would
like
to
I,
I
don't
I
don't
mind
letting
f,
I
mean
unless
someone
anyone
else
on
the
committee
has
any
objections
like
I
don't
really
have
any
objections
to
people
having
comment
requests
as
with
earlier
is
just
just
try
to
keep
them
somewhat
brief.
Michael,
you
have
your
hand
up.
First,
go
ahead.
L
L
I
think
that
this
resolution
regionally
goes
stands,
in
contrast
with
the
plan
that
we
want
to
do
here
in
kansas
city,
and
I
think
that
I
think
that,
quite
frankly
that
this
will
this
will
not
kansas
city,
has
an
opportunity
to
lead
here
in
setting
an
example
for
the
entire
region
and
tacking.
This
on
in
this
way
is,
is,
I
think,
like
not
democratic
and
runs
counter
to
like
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
in
kansas
city.
M
It's
really
you
know
it.
It
feels
to
me
to
and
to
a
lot
of
us
that
it's
it's
you're
not
taking
this
climate
protection
steering
committee
seriously
because
they
are
tasked
to
putting
this
together.
But
you
are
adopting
a
plan
that
is
so
flawed
and
belongs
to
someone
else
doesn't
belong
in
kansas
city,
missouri's
plan.
You
know
today.
We
know
that
mar
tom
and
karen
for
mark
are
out
in
in
somewhere
in
some
place,
talking
to
other
some
other
country
about
urban
planning
and
all
this.
M
But
none
of
that
that
they've
shared
in
their
playbook,
none
of
not
any
single
group
or
agency
or
city,
is
adopting
any
of
those
plans
other
than
maybe
you,
michael
with
some
of
the
the
bike,
the
transit
and
and
the
bike
bike
lanes,
and
all
that,
and
so
we
see
a
problematic.
You
know
touting
this
plan
all
around.
M
You
know
overland
park
across
the
cities
and
tell
them
adopt
this
fan
they
adopt
it
and
they
say
that
we're
doing
everything
we
can
around
climate
change
and
it's
not
composting
and
it's
not
planting
trees
and
that's
it's
not
recycling.
It's
not
public
transportation
that
we
need.
We
need
a
robust
plan
and
your
climate
protection
steering
committee
here
is
tasked
with
that
and
we
want
to
support
them,
but
we
cannot
as
a
community.
N
Thank
you
yeah.
My
name
is
leila
zadie,
I'm
speaking
as
just
a
resident
of
kansas
city
and
want
to
also
name
that
I
have
some
concerns
with
any
language
that
would
possibly
endorse
mark's
plan.
I
think
that
this
plan
was
actually
really
born
out
of
community
engagement,
that
we
that
I
helped
participate
in
that
I
helped
rally
other
community
members
to
participate
in.
K
Oh,
no,
no
you're,
fine!
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
letting
me
speak
real
quickly.
I
also
just
wanted
to
I'm
speaking
as
a
resident
of
kansas
city
missouri
and
also
have
some
concerns
about
this
plan,
and
I
think
I
I'd
like
to
also
just
highlight
to
everyone
to
be
careful
on
how
we're
using
the
term
equity,
because
a
lot
of
times
it's
been
used
as
a
fluff
word,
it's
been
thrown
around.
It
seems
like
a
really
great
term,
also,
along
with
anything
with
health.
K
I
would
like
to
see
more
of
some
measurable
outcomes
from
all
of
that.
This
plan
has
me
concerned
that
we're
not
really
considering
the
community's
expense
and
yes,
we're
putting
something
together
that
could
be
very
innovative
and
can
really
help
push
forward
kansas
city,
especially
in
a
time
when
supreme
court
is
even
opposing
anything.
K
That's
just
one
of
the
pieces,
there's
so
many
other
problems
that
are
also
occurring,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
actually
equitable
and
actually
measuring
what
that
means
and
how
we're
going
to
be
better
tomorrow
compared
to
what
we
are
today.
So
that
was
just
my
thoughts.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
tennis,
and
I
hope
I
I
hope
I
pronounced
it
correctly
that
time,
okay,
well,
acknowledging
that
I
mean
amongst
the
committee
members.
I
mean
my
my
reading
of
this
and
andy
correct
me
on
this.
If
I'm
wrong
on
this
is,
is
it
is
not
to
say
that
that
we're
essentially
folding
the
plan
that
we
have
developed
here
into
mark's
plan?
A
This
is
what
kansas
city
is
is
doing
within
the
context
of
some
of
the
other
things
that
are
happening,
including
with
the
climate
action
plan.
So
I
I
understand
where
folks
are
coming
from
with
their
concerns
about
it,
but
I
also
think
that,
in
my
understanding
of
this
is
that
the
resolution
isn't
saying
that
that
this
is
kansas
city's
plan.
A
And
I
to
michael's
to
michael's
question:
I
think
that
we
can
it's
just
that.
I
think
that
there
are
probably
going
to
be
questions
from
council
members
about
why
we're
why
we
are
adopting
a
plan
around
the
climate
that
doesn't,
at
least
in
some
way
acknowledge
some
of
the
regional
efforts
that
are
happening
as
well.
You
know,
bridget
has
her
hand
up
or
bridgette
really
quick
before
you
speak.
I
want
to
make
sure
if
any
had
anything
more
to
add
and
then
I'll
give
it.
H
Yeah
well
either
way,
but
michael
I
mean
yes,
you
summarize
that
pretty
well.
We
recognize
that
when
we
started
out
with
brendel,
we
allowed
them
access
to
the
08
plan
that
we
had
the
regional
plan.
That
was
that
had
been
passed
at
mark
as
a
starting
point,
but
we
knew
that
that
plan
didn't
go
nearly
far
enough
into
the
community
to
consider
equity.
H
So
we
just
used
it
just
as
a
framework
just
to
start
a
starting
point
and
that's
when
we
brought
on
the
equity
climate,
justice
workers
and
and
the
work
that
we
did
to
get
into
the
community
as
much
as
possible.
So
it
is
literally
just
a
you
know:
a
recognition
of
that
that
regional
work,
that's
being
done
that
we
we
feel
is
important,
but
it
is
certainly
not
to
circumvent
our
plan.
H
O
I'm
gonna
be
up
front
in
the
fact
that,
like
as
a
person
who
reads
a
lot
of
legislation,
I
too
honestly
was
a
little
confused
by
why
the
marks
plan
was
included.
So
I
kind
of
you
know
reiterate
what
all
the
community
members
who
just
talked
stated
as
well-
and
you
know
I
even
reached
out
to
robin
because
I
was
like
they
have
a
different
goal
than
we
do
so.
O
O
So
technically
we
do
endorse
it.
I
don't
I
don't
know
about
like
wordsmithing
or
whatever
I'd
have
to
sit
and
think
about
it
for
a
little
bit,
but
like
maybe
rewording
that
or
even
having
a
separate
resolution
that
endorses
the
marked
plan
from
our
climate
plan
as
well.
For
kansas
city,
I'm
not
really
sure,
and
I
would
love
to
hear
other
people's
opinions.
Because
I
again
I
read
a
lot
of
legislation
daily
and
I
was
also
confused
by
it
at
first
but
robin
kind
of
cleared
the
air
of
like
what
michael
was
saying
as
well.
H
Sure
sure
no
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
do
appreciate
everybody's
comments
about
this.
I
mean
this
is
just.
It
was
a
proposal
of
a
draft
to
kind
of
talk
for
your
consideration
and
I'm
actually
happy
to
hear
all
the
feedback.
Nothing
is
set
in
stone
and
we'll
certainly
have
more
conversations
internally
about
what
that
draft
looks
like
and
we'll
talk
to
council
as
well.
You
know
before
this
actually
gets
introduced
to
see
where
their
comfort
level
is
on
this
as
well.
H
B
Thank
you
I'll
make
this
even
shorter
than
my
last
comment.
Notwithstanding
all
the
comments
that
you've
heard,
which
I
appreciate
and
appreciate
staff
for
getting
input
from
the
committee-
and
you
know
be
reported
obviously
for
working
with
council
on
comfort
levels
on
this,
just
one
person's
opinion
again
as
a
resident
six
district,
you
know,
I
think,
part
of
an
outcome.
I've
been
really
impressed
with
through
this
process.
B
In
particular,
is
you
know,
living
the
examples
set
forth
by
the
regional
climate
action
plan,
and
so
I
would
support
if,
if
this
committee
were
to,
you
know,
support
this
language
and
the
resolution,
I
would
you
know,
add
some.
You
know
encourage
folks
to
add
something
to
the
effect
like
in
the
climate
protection
resiliency
plan
itself
and
in
some
of
the
other
resolutions
that
you've
done
the
city's
done
in
the
past,
where
it's
saying
the
city
will
advocate
and
where
possible,
where
it
can
for
other.
B
To
do
their
own
plans-
and
you
know
actually
you
know,
take
that
essentially
next
step
beyond
the
like
a
framework,
you
know
like
the
climate
action
plan,
you
know,
encourage.
You
know
that
bold
action
like
endorse
this,
but
then
do
you
and
you
know,
follow
this
process.
I
encourage
kansas
city
mo
specifically
to
do
that.
I
think
that's
really
important,
as
largest
jurisdiction
in
the
region,
widely
recognized
as
a
leader
in
the
region.
I
think
that.
K
H
H
And
if
any
of
you
have
comments
language,
so
you
want
to
send
me
email
that
would
be
great,
whether
it's
the
steering
committee
or
community,
I'm
happy
to
to
hear
that
we
still
have
time
till
after
the
holiday
to
to
kind
of
make
a
decision
on
where
we
go
with
that,
so
appreciate
any
any
comments.
People
have
so
with
that.
We're
good,
okay,.
F
All
right
thanks
everyone.
I
think
the
last
thing
that
I
was
hoping
to
discuss
today
was
a
a
letter
of
endorsement
to
send
from
our
committee
to
council,
along
with
the
plan
when
they
get
the
plan.
So
thank
you,
andy
and
marlaney
for
for
getting
that
out
to
folks.
Today,
sorry,
everybody
didn't
have
more
time
to
look
at
it,
but
I
wanted
to
try
to
get
something
in
front
of
all
of
us
during
this
meeting.
F
F
O
O
This
is
just
mostly
like
a
formatting
situation
for
me
and
my
scientific
little
brain,
but
I
see
that
you
put
you
know
like
the
different
strategies
like
for
mobility
and
stuff
like
that
in
there,
and
I
would
like
to
see
more
of
the
strategies
that
are
included
in
the
plan
like
protect
and
expand.
Natural
ecosystems,
I
know,
is
very
vague,
but
we
can
add
like-
and
I
don't
have
the
plane
in
front
of
me,
but
the
numbers
that,
like
legitimately,
include
that
or
any
of
the
like
building
strategies
as
well.
F
O
Yeah-
and
I
can
I
can
help
you
with-
I-
can
assist
you
with
that-
I
just
it
was.
It
was
more
like.
I
think
it
would
be
more
effective
for
the
city
council
to
just
like
not
that
I
want
them
to
not
read
the
entire
plan,
but
you
know
skip
ahead
to
what
we're
prioritizing
and
be
able
to
see
what
those
strategies
are
so
cool,
I'll
holler
at
you
robin.
We
can
work
on
that
together.
F
I
A
O
That's
fair
and
I
think
that
you,
tom
and
myself
can
can
have
like
a
quick
little
like
email
back
and
forth
or
a
meeting
or
anything,
but
from
what
I
remember
of
how
we
built.
This
is
like
the
things
that
could
be
are
either
currently
being
implemented
or
could
be
implemented
like
considering
cost
and
everything
like
that
and
then
also
what's
going
to
reduce
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions
as
quickly
as
possible.
O
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
was
it
bridgette
that
we
we
put
that
list
together
to
make
sure
that
city
council
was
aware
that
there
were
a
number
of
things
already
in
place
up
and
running,
that
we
didn't
want
to
to
lose
track
of
or
diminish,
and
I
I
think
some
of
that's
in
here
too.
What
I
can
tell,
and
and
maybe
for
purposes
of
this
letter,
if
we're
going
to
have
a
list
like
that,
we
should
we
should
frame
it
like
that.
D
O
And
and
I'll
also
add,
as
like
committee
members,
and
even
the
community
like,
if
you
all
have
bigger
priorities
like
within
that
frame,
I
guess
you
could
say
of
what's
best
for
the
community.
What's
best
for
greenhouse
gas
emission
reduction
cost
and
what's
already
being
implemented
like
you
know,
shoot
us
some
things,
because
it's
just
three
of
us
and
you
know
we'll
obviously
take
suggestions.
O
Yeah,
I
think,
let's
shoot
for
next
week,
some
point
just
so.
We
can
get
the
ball
rolling
on
this
as
quickly
as
possible
and
if
any
council
member
or
committee
members
have
suggestions
or
the
community
or
oeq,
you
know
like
send
it
to
us
by
tomorrow,
and
we
can
get
together
and
figure
this
out
and
I'm
sorry
robin.
That's
I'm
not
trying
to
take
over
anything.
But
I
think
that
that
would
be
the
best.
D
H
Yeah
council
won't
be
in
session
next
week,
so
that'll
be
fun
just
check
in
with
me
before
you
get
ready
to
transmit
this,
so
that
we
kind
of
time
it
in
in
with
our
resolution
and
everything
else
going
on.
So
we're
going
to
try
to
get
this
first
reading
in
for
the
following
week.
After
that,
so
that'll
be
well.
I
think
it's
the
14th
of
july
yeah,
fourth,
the
14th
of
july
would
be
the
first
reading
for
the
resolution.