►
From YouTube: Climate Protection Steering Committee - April 6, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
B
C
F
C
C
A
J
I
C
C
That's,
although
very
alarming,
to
say
the
least
is
also
hopeful,
because
it
does
say
that
we
have
all
the
technology
we
need.
We
just
don't
have
much
time
at
least
50
percent
reductions
and
emit
current
emissions
are
needed
by
2030,
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
in
relation
to
to
our
our
plan,
because
our
committee
has
recommended
reducing
current
emissions
by
about
54
by
2030
and
the
consultant
brendel
group
has
said
that
that
is
actually
a
feasible
goal.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
let
those
community
members
who
are
on
today
to
know
that
that
we
are
trying
to
align
with
where
the
ipcc
says
we
need
to
be
so.
In
light
of
that,
I
hope
we
can
all
double
down
our
efforts
to
pass
a
strong
plan
in
the
coming
weeks
and
and
move
ahead
with
getting
to
work
on
it.
So
anyone
have
anything
else.
They
want
to
add
about
the
ipcc
report.
Before
we
move
on.
B
B
C
Okay,
well,
the
purpose
of
today's
meeting
really
is
to
go
through
the
public
comments
we've
received
to
date
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
michael
in
a
minute
to
do
that,
and
then
we
do
have
the
the
last
40
minutes
or
so
of
the
meeting
set
aside
for
public
comment
period
again-
and
I
am
so
that's
how
today's
meeting
is
is
going
to
go.
Do
we
have
rachel?
Do
we
have
the
chat
available?
C
C
E
C
B
K
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay.
Well
again,
we
in
in
talking
with
robin
about
how
to
be
able
to
kind
of
assess
the
the
the
the
public
comments
that
we
have
received
up
to
this
point.
What
we
ultimately
decided
on
was
was
trying
to
identify
some
of
the
key
themes,
so
we
know
that
we
have
the
various
emphasis
areas:
mobility,
natural
systems,
homes
and
buildings,
etc,
and
so
we
we
knew
that
there
were.
B
B
The
numbers
are
not
going
to
equal
up
to
a
hundred,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
there
were
a
couple
of
comments
that
were
left
blank
in
terms
of
being
assigned
to
an
emphasis
area,
but
also
because
there
were
a
couple
specifically
related
to
implementation
that
didn't
really
fit
in
any
of
these
categories
as
well
in
terms
of
the
theme
percentages.
So
the
theme
percentages
are
basically
how
much
were
the
themes
that
were
identified
here
mentioned.
B
Was
there
like
some
word
or
some
phrase
related
to
these
themes
that
showed
up
in
the
comments
for
this
emphasis
area
and
so,
for
example,
with
with
natural
systems?
58
of
the
comments
included
some
sort
of
emphasis
or
mention
of
planting
trees
or
tree
canopy,
and
so
that
is
why
it
was
one
of
the
ones
that
emerged
as
a
common
theme
amongst
those
comments.
B
So
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
go
through
these
these
each
relatively
quickly
and
then
I
will
leave
the
rest
of
the
time
to
to
try
to
answer
questions
as
best
I
can
from
the
other
members
of
the
committee,
and
so
obviously
people
are
welcome
to
drop
their
their
questions
or
comments
in
the
chat.
I
can't
see
them,
but
I
will
try
to
address
those
when
I'm
when
I'm
done
with
my
initial
remarks.
B
So
in
terms
of
of
the
general
emphasis
area,
this
was
kind
of
just
general
overviews
thoughts
about
the
the
plan
as
a
whole.
These
made
up
a
little
over
16
and
a
half
percent
of
all
of
the
comments
that
were
submitted
up
to
this
point.
The
first
theme,
as
you
can
see
here,
was
public
engagement
and
education.
B
B
It
has
been
lacking
in
some
cases
and
that
they
would
very
much
like
to
see
more
more
engagement
done
if
possible,
as
as
the
plan
continues
to
move
forward
and
is
shaped,
and
so
acknowledging
that
that
city
staff
are
are
trying
to
engage
ages
as
much
as
they
can
that
that
was
still
a
comment
that
emerged
in.
It
was
still
a
theme
that
emerged
in
the
comments
for
the
general
section
moving
on
to
implementation
and
finance.
B
B
How
are
we
making
clear
that
that
we're
we're
meeting
those
goals,
whether
it
be
in
terms
of
policy
or
in
terms
of
specific
projects
or
programs
that
have
been
implemented
just
so
that
we
understand,
and
then
the
other
part
of
that
was
understanding
the
finance
piece?
So
people
wanted
to
to
understand
more
about
what
are
the
potential
opportunities
we
have
to
finance
these
changes?
Sustainability
is
an
important
endeavor,
but
it
is
going
to
take.
B
So
moving
on
to
the
mobility
section,
this
made
up
about
12
percent
of
all
of
the
comments
that
were
submitted
in
terms
of
public
comment.
Up
to
this
point,
the
first
one
was
with
regards
to
transit
improvements
and
and
transit
is
already
something
that
is
transit.
Improvements
is
something
that's
already
identified
in
the
plan,
not
just
in
terms
of
it
being
specifically
m3
in
terms
of
improving
transit,
but
this
is
also
something
that
the
the
mobility
work
group
of
the
climate
protection
plan
recently
spoke
about
as
well.
B
So
I
want
to
acknowledge
that,
in
addition
to
the
public
comments
here,
members
of
the
climate
protections
hearing
committee
have
been
continuing
to
work
to
try
to
find
ways
to
to
make
sure
that
we're
emphasizing
to
the
city
council
that,
in
improvements
to
transit,
are,
are
very
important.
So
in
in
terms
of
the
comments
specifically
noted
here,
there
were
several
pieces
that
all
spoke
to
different
aspects
of
transit
improvements.
B
This
included
things
like
more
trees
at
bus
stops
and
trying
to
find
ways
to
increase
shade
coverings
for
people
who
may
have
to
either
wait
out
when
it's
very,
very
hot
and
sunny
or
who
may
be
having
to
wait
out
when
it's
storm
when
it's
raining
or
snowing
hastening
the
adoption
of
electric
buses.
I
I
I
will
note
that
I've
I've
spoken
with
folks
from
the
kcata
and
they
have
noted
that
they
they
are
receiving
support
from
the
federal
government
and
trying
to
to
move
to
transition
as
quickly
as
possible.
B
But
it
is
still
going
to
take
them
some
time,
but
also
greater
adherence
to
the
tod
policy.
So,
for
those
who
aren't
familiar,
tod
is
short
for
transit
oriented
development,
and
so
the
idea
is
that
transit
works
best.
It
works
most
effectively
when
it
is
built
in
in
the
context
of
dense
urban
developments,
and
so
as
much
as
possible.
B
In
terms
of
green
infrastructure,
this
was
just
under
19
of
the
comments
of
the
total
mobility
comments,
and
so
this
spoke
mostly
to
several
different
elements,
including
working
with
with
modot,
on
trying
to
plant
more
more
trees
and
and
bioswales,
making
bigger
requirements
for
green
infrastructure
in
development
projects.
So
what
are
the
ways
that
we
can
ensure?
There's
things
like
native
plant
species?
How
can
we
ensure
that
we
are
having
more
medians
with
greenery?
B
So,
with
regards
to
natural
systems,
this
made
up
a
very
small
amount.
Less
than
one
percent
of
the
total
comments
submitted
in
terms
of
what
was
submitted.
Planting
more
trees
was
a
a
far
and
away
overarching
theme,
and
so
the
idea
was
basically
we
need
to
do
more
to
support
our
tree
system
to
increase
our
tree.
B
The
other
thing
that
was
noted
with
the
with
natural
systems-
and
this
was
about
a
quarter
of
all
of
the
comments
were
submitted
here-
was
water
runoff.
So
several
of
the
comments
spoke
about
the
need
to
better
manage
stormwater
runoff,
and
we
we
all
know
that
with
the
increased
rain
and
snow,
this
is
obviously
going
to
be
a
challenge,
and
so
this,
this
idea
of
of
trying
to
find
more
ways
to
support
more
water
to
capture
more
water.
B
I'm
pretty
sure
that
that
the
water,
runoff
and
community
gardens
pieces
are
already
included
in
the
natural
systems,
and
if
someone
wants
to
correct
me
later
on,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
incorrect,
I
apologize
for
making
that
mistake.
So
moving
on
to
homes
and
buildings,
the
homes
and
buildings
as
a
total
percentage
of
public
comments.
Up
to
this
point,
made
up
about
27
and
a
half
percent
of
of
all
the
comments.
So
so
of
all
of
these
listed
here.
B
B
So
what
what
I
mean
by
this
is
that
many
of
the
people
who
spoke
about
the
buildings
in
in
homes
were
trying
to
kind
of
either
redefine
existing
roles
that
had
already
been
identified
and
somewhat
explained
in
the
plan
to
maybe
say
differently
how
they
might
be
involved
in
implementing
that
strategy.
But
the
other
part
of
it
was
trying
to
expand.
Who
is
involved
in
those
conversations,
so
that
specifically
included
more
language?
B
B
So
I
know
that
that
is
something
that
we
have
are
still
trying
to
get
resolved,
but
I
also
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
that
was
something
that
emerged
in
in
a
number
of
the
comments
related
to
energy
in
terms
of
public
comment
for
the
plan.
Overall,
I
only
have
two.
I
only
have
two
more
left,
so
in
terms
of
wasting
materials,
this
was
a
very
small
portion
as
well
less
than
one
percent.
B
B
One
comment
spoke
to
the
idea
of
an
educational
approach
using
mailers,
but
there
was
also
a
specific
push
in
one
of
the
comments
to
consider
policies
which
would
increase
recycling
opportunities
for
people
who
live
in
rental
or
multi-resident
housing.
So
this
was
66
percent
of
the
comments,
the
other
comment
and
this
this
was
really
just
just
one
comment,
but
I
did
want
to
note
this
was
there
was
a
request
for
a
ban
on
plastic
bags
or
grocery
stores?
B
I
I'm
sure
someone
who
works
more
in
state
policy
can
correct
me
on
this,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
there's
currently
a
ban
on
banning
plastic
bags
in
grocery
stores
in
missouri.
Unfortunately-
and
so
I
did
want
to
acknowledge
that
comment,
but
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
I
think,
as
a
city,
we
might
be
preempted
by
the
state
from
being
able
to
take
that
step
at
this
time.
B
B
I
apologize
the
big
comments
both
of
these
folks
who
submitted
comments,
said
we
need
to
find
more
ways
to
limit
food
waste
through
a
combination
of
partnerships,
reduced
purchasing
composting
and
public
education,
and
I'm
fairly
certain
that
at
least
the
composting
and
partnerships
are
spoken
of
in
the
plan,
but
I'm
not
sure
about
the
public,
education
and
reduced
purchasing.
So
if
someone
else
wants
to
correct
me
on
that
later
on
as
well,
please
feel
free
and
because
they're
those
were
really
the
main
things.
B
C
J
B
H
B
E
F
B
And-
and
I
will
note
that
the
the
city
staff
comments
weren't
included
in
the
numbers
and
themes
that
I
I
drew
up,
that
was
specifically
from
from
members
of
the
public.
I
know
that
someone
has
asked:
can
guests
ask
questions
or
comments?
You
are
welcome
to
to
drop
the
drop,
your
question
or
comment
in
the
chat
and
and
as
robin
had
mentioned
earlier,
we
will
have
a
period
of
public
comment
later
on
as
well.
B
B
C
F
So
I
think
what
we'll
do
just
like
we
discussed
is,
I
think
we
have
a
second
round
of
working
group
meetings
to
probably
go
through,
so
what
we
can
do
is,
if
you
know,
break
them
down
by
the
working
groups
and
and
go
through
more
of
these
comments
and
then
conversations
so
those
will
we'll
have
to
schedule.
Those
second
rounds
still
to
be
done.
J
G
F
C
A
Yeah,
so
we
won't
have
the
finalized
plan
at
that
point,
because
brendell
still
has
that
week
to
incorporate
the
plan
comments.
I
can
tell
you
that
I
have
already
extended
our
time
with
them
a
little
bit
just
preemptively.
We
don't
have
the
budget
in
this
budget
year
to
do
anything
else
that
way,
but
we
have
extended
the
time
of
the
contract
in
case
this
does
run
long.
We,
of
course
we
want
a
plan,
so
we
can
get
active
and
moving
and
get
the
budget
stuff
in.
But
this
is
important
stuff.
A
So
what'll
probably
happen
is
you
guys
will
go
through
the
comments?
The
next
round,
we'll
have
all
the
comments
in
just
like
kind
of
like
you
did
today
put
them
in
buckets,
and
I
apologize
because
I've
missed
some
of
the
meeting
today,
but
kind
of
put
those
in
buckets.
The
the
big
overarching
pieces
that
come
out
of
that
that
you
guys
think
need
to
be
added
worded
into
the
plan,
is
what
we
can
do
and
then
we
can
get
the
then.
A
A
Plan
the
the
plan
is
to
have
it
ready
for
you
to
vote
on
by
the
18th.
You
guys,
I
think
brendall
was
talking
about
trying
to
get
it.
I
misunderstood
your
question.
Get
those
comments,
the
final
comments?
Well,
no,
it's
not
going
to
be
ready
for
you're
still
debating
comments.
Yeah
we're
probably
going
to
have
to
move.
I
mean
I
wouldn't
necessarily
you
can
move
your
meeting
or
you
can
have
an
additional
meeting,
whichever
you
might
like,
if
you
want
to
have
your
meeting
on
the
18th
to
kind
of
talk
through.
A
B
So
so
robin
I,
I
think,
because
the
main
thing
we've
been
we've
been
meeting
about
is
is
regarding
the
plan
I
mean,
I
think
it
would
be
fine
for
us
to
push
back
the
meeting
so
that
we
don't
have
to
have
two
meetings,
because
I
feel
like
outside
of
the
plan.
We're
probably
not
gonna
have
a
whole
heck
of
a
lot
to
talk
about
on
the
18th.
So.
A
A
B
C
A
Yeah
and
brindle's
getting
the
comments
at
the
same
time,
you
are
if
there
are
easy,
logistic
changes
like
adding
a
couple
words
here
to
strengthen
something
or
small
edits
like
that
they're
just
incorporating
them
as
we
go
so
so
the
plan
will
be
ready
to
launch
with
the
the
new
comments
if
the
city's
like
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
great
idea,
add
geothermal
to
this
or
whatever
easy
stuff
that
we
know
everybody's
going
to
be
on
board
with,
but
everything
else
is
going
to
come
through.
You
guys.
C
L
L
I
know
I've
put
comments
in
the
sheets
that
were
up
in
google
drive,
I
don't
see
them
reflected
at
all
and
it
could
be
that
the
person
reading
them.
I
mean,
first
of
all,
it's
hard
to
reduce
comments
into
something
that
will
fit
in
the
boxes
and
I'm
not
talking
about
length
of
comment
I'm
talking
about
what
it
addresses,
because
natural
systems
you're
not
going
to
get
to
in
a
reductive
process.
You
can
talk
about
parts
of
them,
but
you
can't
get
to
an
actual
solution
that
is
addressing
the
system.
L
So
I
will
I'll
make
my
comments
in
an
email,
but
I
I'm
really
concerned
you
know
with
energy.
It
may
be
more
likely
or
it's
easier
for
people
to
see
what
the
system
is
and
to
address
it.
But
in
natural
systems,
planting
trees
is
not
that's,
not
a
solution,
that's
something
you
do
as
part
of
it.
It's
like
saying,
you
know,
take
your
vitamin
and
now
you've
got
human
health.
L
A
E
A
Because
she
missed
the
strategy
session
and
came
back
in
afterwards
and
added
her
comments,
and
I
don't
know
those
were
all
sent
back
into
brindle
I
can.
I
can
try
to
pull
some
of
those
out
of
that
hillary
as
well,
but
yeah
if
you've
got
specific
ideas
on
how
to
strengthen
natural
systems.
If
you
want
to
send
it
to
the
oeq
email,
or
I
mean
we
can
even
have
a
phone
call,
I
haven't
talked
in
a
while.
So.
C
M
M
So
I
would
really
encourage
you
all
to
come:
we're
going
to
be
providing
forums
and
opportunities
for
them
to
get
public
comment
on
the
plan
as
well.
We're
going
to
have
speakers
from
casey,
tennant
stand
up,
kc
operation,
liberation
and,
of
course,
clean
air.
Now
would
really
like
you
all
to
attend.
M
As
far
as
the
actual
plan
itself,
I've
been
pretty
clear
that
I
think
this
plan.
I
think
it's
pretty
hard
for
working
people
to
see
themselves
in
this
plan.
I
don't
know
what
affordable
means,
what
affordable
to
who
define
affordable.
I
don't
I
don't.
I
don't
know
how
that
like.
I
don't
know
that
the
costs
aren't
going
to
be
passed
on
to
me
as
a
resident
of
kansas
city.
I
think
it's
interesting
that
we've
talked
a
lot
about
funding
as
kristin
riot
as
you
brought
up
funding.
M
I
think
it's
really
interesting
that
we're
giving
millions
of
dollars
to
the
kansas
city
police
department.
I
think
it's
really
interesting
that
ever
g
has
record
profits.
Every
year
pays
zero
taxes.
They
could
probably
pay
for
the
plan.
I
feel
like
the
plan,
could
address
those
concerns
and
and
talk
about
those
those
solutions.
M
N
N
What
we
have
in
the
2008
climate
action
plan
includes
very
kind
of
loosey-goosey
language
about
it,
which
resulted
in
as
billy
and
a
few
others
on
this
call,
and
I
have
engaged
with
the
city
to
try
to
come
to
the
iecc
2021
have
have
meant
that
we
had
headwinds
the
entire
way
and,
at
every
step,
we're
encouraged
to
compromise
and
water
down
those
those
the
adoption
of
those
codes.
So
to
me,
those
are
to
the
most
critical
pieces
that
this
plan
really
needs
to
get
right,
I'll.
Stop
there
thanks.
F
G
G
He
him
the
resident
of
the
sixth
district
will
not
repeat
all
the
comments
that
have
been
shared
just
going
down
my
list
of
things
that
I
had
had
to
say
that
already
been
said,
but
just
in
the
following
up
on
what
has
been
previously
said
about
kind
of
you
know,
cod
of
using
this
planning
process
and
implementation
is
also
a
way
to
codify
some
good
practices.
Folks
mentioned
the
energy
code.
I
think.
G
G
I
really
think
this
is
an
amazing
opportunity
that
has
been
led
by
the
folks
in
this
room,
folks,
who
are
volunteers
and
some
folks
for
our
staff,
finding
ways
to
codify
and
memorialize
a
dedication
to
striving
to
connect
with
more
people
and
bringing
more
community
voices
and
centering
community
voices
in
these
important
processes
and
putting
their
needs
first.
Just
will.
It
would
encourage.
C
G
This
body
and
we'll
reflect
this
in
more
detail
and
written
comments,
but
just
to
ensure
that
the
final
iteration
of
the
plan
reflects
a
strong
commitment
to
public
engagement
and
ensuring
very
transparent,
inclusive
governance
for
the
establishing
these
policies.
That
will
impact
people's
lives
so,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
your
continued
work
and
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
watch
you
all
serve.
Thank
you.
C
O
O
Services
isn't
really
captured
in
the
plan,
and
I
I
do
take
a
little
bit
of
responsibility
for
not
making,
and
you
know
for
not
kind
of
harping
on
this
as
the
plan
was
being
developed,
but
we'll
provide
some
comments
in
the
hopes
that
we
can
kind
of
create
a
little
bit
of
room
in
there
at
this
very
late
process,
and
I
apologize
to
lara
for
even
saying
this
today,
as
opposed
to
three
months
ago.
So
I'm
gonna.
That's
all.
O
A
Yeah,
this
is
just
a
follow-up
kelly
at
this
late
in
the
game.
It
would
be
better
if
you
think
that
there
needs
to
be
a
strategy,
focus
that
you
have
clear
wording
at
this
point
of
what
that
needs
to
look
like.
So
we
can
just
pass
that
directly
on
to
brindle,
and
then
this
group
can
debate
it
instead
of
kind
of
an
overarching
thought
that
we
have
to
put
a
lot
of
work
into
developing
a
strategy.
So
if
you
could
make
sure
it
comes
pretty
concise,
that'd
be
great.
B
I
did
want
to
take
a
moment
to
also
acknowledge.
I
know
laura
answered
this
question
already,
but
someone
had
asked
if
there
was
any
intention
of
filling
the
vacancies
in
the
cpsc
before
the
plan
is
approved.
Laura
already
spoke
to
this,
but
I
do
want
to
make
it
very
clear
that
the
current
members
of
the
cpsc,
unfortunately
don't
have
any
control
over
it
and
neither
do
staff
I
it
is.
It
is
not
us
trying
to
cop
out
it's
it's
just
that's
that's
the
nature
of
this.
B
The
cpsc
members
here
are
doing
the
best
that
we
can,
but
I
would,
I
would
definitely
say
that
we
would
be
helped
by
having
having
those
vacancies
filled
as
I'm
as
I'm
sure,
staff
would
probably
feel
the
same
way
too.
But
it's
it's
really
important
for
electeds
to
hear
from
you,
because
they're
they're,
ultimately
the
ones
who
make
the
decisions
on
appointing
those
vacancies
and
they
will
be
the
ones
who
will
be
debating
whether
or
not
to
actually
adopt
the
plan
when
it
is
finalized
by
us.
B
C
H
I
would
like
to
hear
more
from
michael
about
michael
wolff
about
the
specific
ideas
that
he
has
regarding
the
the
income
situation
that
many
many
many
kansas
citians
are
in.
That
is
not
addressed
by
the
plan,
so
I
I
would
love
to
have
the
opportunity
to
hear
more
about
that.
Michael,
I
don't
know
if
we
we
can
do
it
offline
or
if
you
have
more
comments
to
make
now
either
one.
C
M
H
Yeah,
it's
I
mean
I
would
say
about,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
about
a
full
third
of
households
in
kansas
city
or
are
in
the
situation
that
you're
describing
and
it's
clear
that
that
is
it.
That
needs
to
be
a
focal
point
and
we
have
had
a
lot
of
kind
of
offline
discussions
about
it.
But
I
I'd
really
like
to
hear
more
of
your
ideas
and
I'm
sorry
that
I
can't
make
it
to
the
thing
tonight.
M
M
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
concerns
about
like
I
I
for
one.
I
think
there
just
needs
to
be
specificity
about
like
what
is
affordable.
What
is
low
income
and
using
like
using
real
metrics
to
back
that
up
and
making
that,
like,
like
really
really
defining
that,
because,
what's
affordable
to
one
person
is
not
necessarily
affordable
to
another
like
even
just
being
able
to
like
have
internet
connection
can
be.
M
You
know
a
problem
as
far
as
like
concrete
things
within
the
plan,
I
don't
know,
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
laudable
ideas
in
the
plan
like
one
is
to
expand
access
to
like
composting,
for
instance,
as
a
working
person.
I
look
at
that
and
I
go
okay.
Does
that
mean
the
cost
is
going
to
be
passed
on
to
me?
M
Am
I
going
to
be
required
to
like
pay
for
composting
now
as
an
addition
utility
bill
like
is
that
is
that
a
thing
is
there
a
way
that
that
service
can
be
like
more
affordable
to
me?
I
think
there
is
also
I'd,
like
I
think,
there's
also
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
be
more
flexible
with
the
the
water
department,
which
is
an
area
that
the
city
has
a
lot
of
control
over.
Quite
frankly,
the
water
department
is
atrocious
and
like
atrocious
to
navigate
for
a
number
of
different
reasons.
M
I
think
yeah.
I
think
it's
also
like
when
we
talk
about
even
defining
other
terms
like
convenient,
like
the
plan
mentions,
convenient
public
transportation.
What
does
convenient
actually
mean
like?
Does
that
mean
I
can
catch
a
bus
every
five
minutes?
Does
that
mean
I
can
catch
a
bus,
every
20
minutes?
Where
can
that
bus?
Take
me
like
affordability
like
when
public
transit
is
expanded.
We
talk
a
lot
about
green
gentrification
in
kansas
city
like
all
along
the
streetcar
rents
are
being
where
the
streetcar
is
being
built.
M
Rents
are
being
raised,
and
you
know
I
think
we
sunrise
takes
a
lot
of
inspiration
from
or
takes
notice
of
a
lot
of
things
that
happened
with
the
yellow
best
movement
in
france,
right
where,
where
people
revolted,
because
they
were
having
like
the
the
costs
of
greening
the
community
passed
on
to
them
right-
and
I
think
that
is
a
very
real
concern
that
the
city
could
face.
You
know
we're
already
seeing
rising
rising
gas
prices
like
so.
I
think
I
think
we
should
be.
M
We
should
be
very
concerned
about
the
ways
in
which
greening
our
econ
greening
our
world
and
our
economy
can
actually
perpetuate
classism.
So
those
are
those
are
just
a
number
of
things.
I
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
working
people
who
will
be
at
the
town
hall
tonight
who
will
have
a
lot
more,
who
have
a
lot
more
specifics
than
than
I
could
get
into
here,
but.
I
Yeah
I
was
going
to
thank
you,
know,
kristen,
for
calling
and
michael
and
asking
for
more
specifics,
because
I
think
these
are
things
you
know.
As
we
are
nearing
the
you
know,
11th
12th
hour
of
the
public
comment
period.
They
are,
you
know,
components
that
we
really
need
to
take
into
consideration,
and
I
also
think
you
know
some
tensions
that
we've
all
worked
through.
I
So
you
know
if
we
are
giving
out
if,
if
we're,
if
this
is
a
plan
that
that
is
if
this
is
a
plan,
that
is
further
subsidizing
development
because
of
energy
efficiency.
But
that
means
that
this
these
dollars
are
pricing
out.
You
know
poor
black,
often
oftentimes.
You
know
black
folks,
oftentimes
brown,
folks
and
working
class
folks,
then
you
know
that
is
not
a
responsible
way
to
you
know
address
sustainability.
I
We
have
a
lot
of
sustainability,
amenities
in
the
city
which
I
personally
enjoy.
I
mean
I
personally
love
using
the
streetcar,
but
to
michael's
point
you
know,
a
lot
of
our
neighbors
are
being
displaced,
as
development
is
going
up
around
the
streetcar.
You
know
a
lot
of
us
celebrated
the
passive
housing
construction
in
the
river
market.
That
is
the
first
passive
housing
construction.
I
believe
in
the
country
it
costs
hundred
dollars
for.
H
H
But
those
are
the
things
that
I
think
are
showing
up
and
really
high
on
surveys
of
citizens
and
citizens,
don't
necessarily
know,
for
example,
to
ask
for
help
with
energy
efficiency,
which
could
be
putting
money
back
in
in
their
pockets.
So
it's
a
lot
to
to.
I
mean
it's
a
hairball
to
try
and
figure
out
all
of
this,
and
I
think
we
need
further
conversation
about
it.
A
I
absolutely
love
all
this
dialogue,
that's
going
on
because
this
is
all
really
really
true,
big,
crazy,
hairy
stuff,
and
so
I'm
just
this
is
my.
This
is
my
call
out
to
all
of
you
that
have
put
so
much
effort
into
getting
this
plan
across
the
finish
line.
Understand
that-
and
I've
said
this
in
the
last
and
several
meetings.
A
Please
email
the
oeq
address
and
say
I
want
to
be
at
the
table
when
we
discuss
housing
or
I
want
to
be
at
the
table
when
we
discuss
mobility,
because
that's
that's
where
we're
gonna
have
those
big,
deep
metrics
and
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
come
up
with
with
costs
and
how
things
are
gonna
work.
So
yeah
love
to
have
you
all
continue
to
be
at
the
table
going
forward.
B
Sure,
and-
and
I
I
will
note
too,
that
I
I
definitely
understand
michael's
point
and
agree
with
laura
like
we-
we
definitely
want
want
you
and
other
folks
to
be
be
involved
with
us.
Cpsc
can
can
only
do
so
much
in
terms
of
being
involved
with
this
process,
but,
oh,
oh
man,
I
think
I
lost
one
of
my
recycling
bins
to
the
win
I'll
say
really
quickly.
B
I
just
I
think,
just
just
to
clarify
and
this
this
does
not
mean
that
we're
we're
finalizing
this
at
all,
but
kind
of
to
laura's
point
the
contribution
from
from
michael
about
specifically
asking
about
what
is
affordable
and
what
is
convenient.
I
think
it
is.
It
is
not
lost
on
this
group,
but
the
plan
is
really
meant
to
kind
of
get
the
terms
into
consideration
so
that
when
the
policies
come
down,
that
would
be
the
specific
place
where
they're
defining
what
is
what
is
convenient?
What
is
affordable?
B
So
it's
it's
not
that
we're
trying
to
avoid
having
that,
but
we
just
want
to
specifically
acknowledge
that
the
way
that
that
the
plan
is
is
kind
of
guiding
the
city
in
terms
of
consideration
that
that's
kind
of
what
the
the
idea
is
at
least
at
the
moment,
and-
and
so
I
I
did
want
to
note-
there
was
one
other
comment
and
then
I'll
get
to
the
folks
in
in
the
chat
who
have
their
hands
raised.
Eslin
did
know-
and
I
just
wanted
to
read
this
in
case
folks-
are
watching.
B
This
is
also
an
opportunity
for
how
we
move
forward,
to
not
only
tackle
climate
change,
but
to
also
address
our
many
disparities
and
defend
human
rights
and
democracy.
This
plan
can
also
be
a
platform
for
spurring
new
jobs
and
economic
loan
in
the
region.
Creating
clean
energy
jobs,
good
paying
jobs
for
working
people
and
commercial
activity
needed
to
transition
us
to
a
clean
energy
future,
that's
more
affordable
and
equitable
and
inclusive,
and
then,
let's
see
okay.
B
K
Yes,
yes,
I
do.
A
number
of
things
occur
to
me,
michael
I'd
like
to
address
to
you,
but
it's
obviously
not
focused
on
you.
You
simply
brought
up
some
of
the
issues
that
that
obviously
need
to
be
addressed.
If
not
clarified,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
need
to
think
about
how
if
we
define
affordable,
is
it
something
that
needs
to
be
included
in
a
modified
text
or
is
it
something
that
can
be
included
in
a
glossary?
K
The
other
question,
the
other
part
of
that
is
when
you
try
and
identify
or
define
what
is
affordable
as
an
example,
do
we
just
use
it?
Would
it
would
seem
to
me
that
it
would
be
the
easiest
to
use
the
existing
federal
programs
guidelines,
department
of
housing
and
urban
development?
As
an
example
has
definitions
of
affordable
housing
that
are
modified
by
the
metropolitan
statistical
areas?
K
K
I
think
with
regard
to
whether
or
not
this
is
a
perfect
plan,
I
think
we're
never
going
to
get
to
a
perfect
plan,
and
I
think
that,
just
as
we
did
with
the
current
climate
plan,
we
need
to
see
this
plan
as
our
next
base
for
moving
ahead.
The
next
jumping
off
point,
if
you
will
and
and
and
we've
said
it
a
number
of
times,
making
sure
that
we
see
this
plan
as
something
dynamic,
which
means
it's
going
to
change
over
time.
Based
on
our
our
experiences
that
occur.
K
K
K
I
don't
profess
at
this
point
to
have
an
answer
to
that,
but
I
think
the
the
the
your
your
participation
in
helping
the
city
staff
to
better
define
that
and
to
talk
about
how
do
you
begin
to
think
about
implementation
of
those
of
those
of
those
things
very
specifically
in
in
a
way
that
addresses
what
your
concerns
are
for
the
people
that
you're
cons
that
you're
you're
you're
representing
and
what
you
say.
So
that's
enough
rambling
at
this
point.
O
Yeah,
just
a
quick
follow-up.
Thanks
michael
I
I
opened
with
an
apology
that
I
didn't
say
anything
earlier.
We
did
actually
comment
immediately
on
the
the
title
change
from
transportation
to
mobility
and
and
asked
that
the
the
committee
and
the
planning
team
not
kind
of
forget
about
other
aspects
of
transportation,
especially
commercial
transportation,
but
it
obviously
wasn't
added,
as
the
plan
was
being
flushed
out,
so
we'll
email,
the
oeq,
with
specific
recommendations
as
requested,
but
for
the
form
of
our
recommendations.
O
B
A
Yeah
definitely,
you
said
something
before
about
adding
strategies
or
sections
or
something
and
yeah.
We
won't
be
adding
any
more
sections
to
the
plan
and
the
the
names
and
titles
that
went
into
that
plan
were
vetted
through
some
community
members,
with
our
early
surveys
and
the
climate
justice
workers
just
to
make
sure
we
weren't
capturing
something
that
left
out
modes
of
mobility.
So
it's,
but
definitely
we
can
add
something
to
transportation.
As
like
the
whole
section
description-
and
we
can
probably
add-
I
mean
I
don't
know
that
we
can
necessarily.
O
P
P
P
If
we
we
own
that,
if
we
own
the
way
that
that's
happening,
if
we
own
and
underwrite
the
funding-
and
that's
what
scares
me
about
when
we
you
know
honestly
the
funding
paragraph,
I
found
it
sad
that
we
have
immediately
have
to
just
resort
to
our
tax
base
is
low,
so
we
have
to
rely
on
third-party
grants.
I
know
it's
not
oeq's
fault,
you
are
only
given
the
money
you
have
by
the
city,
but
that's
fundamentally
where
I've
I'm
fear,
because
you
know
I
want.
P
I
want
the
like
immigrant
owned
businesses
down
the
street
for
me
to
be
able
to
have
solar
panels
on
their
buildings.
I
want
the
neighborhoods
that
I
you
know
I
was
around
or
the
communities
I
was
around
to
have
access
to
these
things
and
I
think
another
aspect
of
that
is
that
the
benefits
should
not
necess
as
when
we
educate
people
should
not
necessarily
even
be
framed
as
a
climate
goal.
P
I
know
that
you
know
it
should
be
that
this
bus
system
is
getting
better
and
it's
making
my
life
easier
to
take
that
bus
and
I'm
gonna.
Take
it
right.
This
food
system
growing
food
in
my
neighborhood.
It
feels
better
for
me,
it's
better
for
my
life,
it's
more
accessible
to
me,
so
I'm
gonna
do
it
and
I
think
too
often
we
rely
on
things
like
you
know,
I
think,
about
electric
vehicles.
P
I
don't
know
if
a
lot
of
people
see
that
at
least
my
community
see
that
as
like
something
that
will
benefit
their
life
right
now,
but
it's
just
something
they're
told
to
do
because
it's
good
for
the
climate
and
that's
when
we
rely
on
those
kinds
of
individual
choices.
I
find
it
really
not
compelling
for,
for
you
know
like
the
pakistani
aunties,
who
really
don't
care
about
the
climate.
P
As
far
as
I
I'm
concerned,
because
they
don't
they
don't
know,
and
I
think
it's
like
the
gas
stove
thing
is
like
similar
to
that
right,
like
I
just
think
at
scale.
Remove
building
de-conversation
is
super
important,
but
individually
asking
different
people
is
not
going
to
produce
much
right
because
in
my
immediate
lifetime
it's
not
accessible
for
me
because
it's
expensive,
it's
not
you
know
my
you
know
the
my
life
is
not
has
already
been
functioning.
This
way.
P
Does
that
make
sense,
so
I
think,
like
bringing
people
in
who
have
been
forgotten
is
really
important,
and
that's
why
the
jobs
to
me,
like
is
also
really
critical.
I
want
publicly
backed
publicly
funded
jobs
from
this
plan
and
I
think
that
would
be
amazing,
because
we
can
build
bus
lines
off
of
that
it
pumps
money
into
our
economy.
We
can
provide
dignified
labor.
P
You
know
all
of
that,
so
those
are
just
some
of
the
things
that
come
up
for
me.
That
really
why
I
really
really
really
want
to
see
public
investment
in
this,
and
the
elephant
in
the
room,
in
my
mind,
is
that
there
are.
There
are
departments
in
our
city
that
are
very,
very
well
funded,
and
that
is
the
police
department.
It
is
incredibly
well
funded.
There
are
other
departments
that
are
very
well
funded
and
nobody
questions
it,
and
so
it's
time
to
really
think
about
you
know
we're
presented
with
this
choice
of.
P
Do
we
continue
to
invest
in
things
that
aren't
working
or
do
we
invest
in
something
that
will
have
a
direct
measurable
impact
on
people
and
benefit
everyone's
livelihood.
So
that's
kind
of
all.
I
have
to
say,
but
I
really
look
forward
to
the
changes
that
will
come
out
of
this
and
I
don't
think
it's
a
perfect
plan,
but
I
think
that
it
can
be
transformed
into
something
that
will
really
benefit
people.
B
B
Please
also
make
sure
that
your
your
mayor
and
your
council
members
are
hearing
about
this
as
well,
because
we
we
definitely
want
to
advise
them
and
want
to
share
these
comments,
but
it's
also
really
important
that,
in
addition
to
hearing,
in
addition
to
sharing
your
thoughts
with
us,
that
you're
you're
sharing
your
thoughts
with
them
as
well.
So
again,
thank
you
to
everyone
who
took
the
time
to
share
their
comments.
We
really
do
appreciate
you
all
taking
the
time
to
do
that.
B
B
Angela,
just
wanted
to
say
said:
I
think
we
learned
a
lot
about
public
messaging
from
these
past
couple
years.
For
many
people,
a
message
of
for
the
greater
health
of
the
community
doesn't
resonate.
They
need
to
understand
individual
impact
beyond
climate.
As
you
know,
it
will
likely
be
true
for
many
people
when
it
comes
to
this
climate
plan.
B
Michael
wolf
said:
yes,
jobs
are
the
other
big
component.
I
was
blanking
on
when
kristen
asked
earlier,
raising
the
gap
enemies
here
already
talking
about
this,
but
I'm
struck
by
the
need
for
good
pain,
dig
to
five
jobs
with
access
to
collective
bargaining
and
then
don
wallace
laura's.
Just
points
are
amplified
by
michael
kelly's
follow-up
regarding
the
policy
implementation
phase,
especially
describing
how
the
public
will
further
involve,
will
be
further
involved
following
the
adoption
of
the
plan
are
very
helpful
for
understanding
the
plan's
power.
B
These
points
delineated
in
the
plan
not
quite
sure
what
that
means.
This
would
be
helpful
for
the
public's
understanding
of
the
breadth
of
this
plan.
So
hey
don.
I
appreciate
your
point.
I
don't
quite
understand
your
question,
so
we
do
have
a
minute
if
you
wanted
to
try
to
explain
or
if
you
want
to
just
follow
up
offline.
That's
fine
as
well
so
sure,
let's
see
here.
Q
Q
Oh
okay,
you
hear
me,
oh
I'm
sorry,
I'm
thinking
to
myself
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
raise
the
hand.
So
no
all
I
was
saying
was
just
laura's
laura's
point
what
you
said,
michael
about
more
public
engagement
here
after
this
plan
is
finally
adopted
in
terms
of
just
policy
implementation.
That's,
and
I
think
that
would
help
be
helpful
for
the
public
to
understand
exactly
how
this
plan
runs
into
into
the
the
process
of
how
it's
going
to
be
implemented.
Q
So
I
I
think
I
think
it's
very
helpful
just
just
for
our
understanding
of
how
how
all
this
stuff
works
and,
and
especially
the
fact
that
more
there
will
be
more
public
engagement
as
this
thing
as
as
laura
was
indicating
in
requesting
michael
wolff
to
be
engaged
in
this
stuff.
So
right
right,
that's
the
point
I
was
trying
to
get
at
so
okay.
J
A
So
we
don't
know
what
we
do
know
is
that
once
we
have
all
these
strategies
together
and
brendol
is
in
the
process
of
creating
kind
of
a
prioritization
framework
for
the
climate
protection
steering
committee.
So
because
we
know
we
got
to
do
all
of
these
things.
So
the
next
step
after
we
get
the
plan
adopted
is
for
us
to
go
back
to
all
of
those
implementation
leaders
and
all
of
these
different
areas
that
are
in
the
short
term
implementation
plan
and
go
okay.
A
We
got
to
start
moving
on
this
who's
got
it
because
we
at
the
city,
I
mean
we're
still
sitting
right
about
70
staffing,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
get
the
staffing
on
board
to
do
this
in
some
of
these
departments
we're
good
it
all
takes
time.
So
it's
all
going
to
start
moving
kind
of
at
the
same
time
and
things
that
we're
going
to
need
really
really
strong
policies.
A
A
A
A
This
is
what
we
need
to
implement
this
and
then
we're
going
to
start
bringing
people
to
the
table
to
figure
out
how
we
fund
and
how
we
do
policy
so
and
then
we
what's
going
to
happen,
is
we
can't
just
ask
council
for
money
in
the
middle
of
the
year?
You
guys
can
do
that.
For
us,
it
doesn't
always
happen,
but
what
we
have
to
do
is,
by
december
of
this
year,
maybe
even
november,
to
submit
a
budget
decision
package
to
council
and
the
city
manager.
A
That
says
this
is
the
money
we
need
to
do
the
work
that
we
said
we
would
do
in
this
plan
and
those-
and
it
can't
just
be-
we
need
70
million
dollars
for
affordable
housing.
It's
going
to
have
to
be.
It's
got
to
be
exact,
we
need
you
know,
50
million,
to
install
heat
pumps
and
low
income
homes.
We
need
this
much
to
do
it's.
It's
got
to
be
line
by
line
for
it
to
get
approved
for
our
offices
to
do
these
things
so
gosh
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
climate
tax.
B
Absolutely
well
lara.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
explanation
again.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for,
for
taking
the
time
to
be
here,
to
to
share
your
comments
and
to
listen
to
various
people
here,
ramble
myself
included.
I
I
definitely
would
encourage
folks
to
if
they
they
feel
so
inclined
to
to
attend
the
public
town
hall
this
evening,
I
I
apologize
myself.
I
won't
be
able
to
attend,
but
definitely
another
opportunity
for
for
folks
to
to
get
involved
as
well.
B
C
Thanks
michael,
this
has
been
a
great,
a
great
meeting,
great
conversation
today,
so
I
really
appreciate
everyone
being
here
and
so
our
next
meeting
it
sounds
like
will
be
april
25th,
and
I
guess
we
can
talk
laura
and
committee
about
about
whether
it
needs
to
be
at
3
30
or
whether
we
could
do
it
in
the
evening.
So
I
guess
we
can
check
people's
availability
and
we'll
do
and
we
will
make
it
a
point
to
give
the
public
as
much
notice
about
the
time
of
that
meeting
as
possible.