►
From YouTube: Business Meeting for Tuesday, November 16, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
A
A
C
Commissioners,
as
a
condition
to
the
merger,
evergy
agreed
to
file
an
earnings
report
and
sharing
plan
ersp
for
the
years,
2020
2021,
2022
and
2023,
to
explain
that
if
their
return
on
equity
exceeds
9.3
percent
in
any
of
those
years,
the
excess
earnings
will
be
split.
50
50
between
customers
and
shareholders.
C
The
the
current
ever
ge,
rsp
filing,
shows
that
evergy
kansas
metro
customers
are
entitled
to
a
bill.
Credit
of
443
420,
which
would
come
out
to
approximately
cents
per
customer
kerr,
believes
combining
the
1.73
the
1.73
bill.
Credit
with
the
annual
bill
credits
to
be
issued
on
march
22nd
eliminate
some
unnecessary
administrative
costs.
A
A
A
E
A
D
After
that,
the
commission
weighs
the
five
factors
found
in
ksa
66
1220a
and
makes
determination
as
to
whether
they
release
the
information
or
not.
Here
evergy
claimed
the
information
to
remain
confidential
because
it
contained
market
specific
information
related
to
services
in
competition
with
others.
D
A
A
B
A
I'm
sorry
absolutely.
I
would
second
that
it's
been
moved
in
a
second
that
we
approved
the
order
in
this
daca
any
further
discussion,
a
hearing,
none.
I
would
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye,
aye
motion
carries
the
order
is
approved
next
matter
up
on
our
notice
agenda
is
docket
number
22
dasio
and
s
days,
three,
two
o
two
day:
c-p-e-n,
it's
in
the
matter
of
the
failure
of
pollock
energy
llc
as
operator
to
comply
with
kar-82-3-120
and
ker-82-3-133
by
operating
under
a
revoked
license.
A
E
Good
morning,
thank
you
before
you
as
a
penalty
order
for
a
plateau
operating
corporation
whose
license
was
suspended
for
non-compliance
with
the
commission's
order
in
docket
22-cons
3083-cen
yesterday
operator
did
bring
itself
into
compliance
with
the
commission's
order
in
that
docket.
However,
while
its
license
was
suspended,
operator
performed
oil
and
gas
activities.
Therefore,
this
order
assesses
a
ten
thousand
dollar
penalty.
With
that,
I
would
recommend
approval
of
the
order
and
I'm
available
for
any.
A
A
The
operator
is
from
dallas
texas,
and,
what's
amazing,
to
me
about
this-
is
that
the
original
violation
was
the
failure
to
file
a
well-completion
report,
a
fairly
straightforward
regulatory
obligation,
fairly
simple,
to
comply
with,
frankly,
from
that
it
went
to
a
suspended
license,
and
then
from
that
we
come
to
the
point
of
having
the
operator
conducting
operations
under
a
suspended
license
seemingly
indifferent.
I
guess
to
the
fact
that
the
commission
had
issued
another
in
order
of
suspending
the
license.
A
I
think
in
this
particular
case,
the
ten
thousand
dollar
penalty
and
the
the
the
shut
in
order
and
the
all
that
goes
with.
That
is
there's
an
appropriate
penalty.
I'm
I'm
just
struck
that
such
a
relatively
innocuous
compliance
matter,
the
operator
would
allow
that
to
become
something
that
basically
jeopardizes
their
status
in
kansas
as
an
operator.
It's
just
astounding
to
me
to
be
quite
frank.
A
Very
good
appreciate
your
comments.
I
would
I
didn't
mean
to
to
gloss
over
too
quickly
again.
I
I
would
commend
ken
jones,
the
ecrs
in
this
particular
case,
for
being
as
conscientious
as
he
was,
especially
in
some
of
the
remote
parts
of
south
west
kansas.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
hearing
none?
I
would
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye
motion
carries
the
order
is
approved.
A
This
is
in
the
matter
of
the
failure
of
one
source
financial
services
inc
as
operator
to
comply
with
kar
82-3-120
and
ker
82-3-133
by
operating
under
a
suspended
license.
Once
again,
we
have
before
us
a
shut-in
order
involving
this
operator,
and
our
presenter
again
is
assistant
to
is
litigation
council,
tristan,
kimball,
tristan.
Please.
E
A
A
I
just
really
can't
commend
richard
enough
for
his
the
thoroughness
of
his
inspection
report
and
obviously
his
follow-on
and
the
level
of
detail
into
which
he
dealt
in
presenting
this
matter
before
the
commission.
Again,
we
have
an
operator
here,
wow,
it's
an
out-of-state
operator.
This
operator
is
based
in
mcallen
texas
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
really
concerned
here
about
what
is
the
seeming
level
of
indifference
by,
in
this
particular
case,
a
couple
of
out-of-state
operators
toward
the
compliance
requirements
of
the
state.
A
I
do
believe
in
this
particular
instance
that
the
twenty
thousand
dollar
penalty
under
the
circumstances
is
appropriate,
and
I
I
I
just
joined
with
commissioner
commending
the
staff
for
the
thoroughness
of
their
investigation
on
this
matter.
Any
further
discussion
carrying
out.
I
would
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
that
I
I
motion
carries
the
order
is
approved.