►
From YouTube: Community Meeting, September 14, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
A
C
Yeah
I
mean
you
have
seen
that
conversations
by
MJ
and
me
and
it's
like
so
MJ
did
a
lot
of
work.
Theory
picking
I
know
20
commits
so
we
split
up
this
big
one
all-in-one
commit
into
smaller
ones,
by
package
or
by
area
more
or
less
staging
Repository
and
out
of
those
MJ
did
the
majority
of
the
work
and
I
I
followed
up
with
API
extensions,
API
server
and
now
I'm
on
control
plane.
C
C
So
I
think
that
the
majority
of
the
work
was
an
API
extension
API
server.
So
MJ
tried
a
couple
of
times:
I
tried
at
least
twice
there's
one
big
Pi
in
Upstream,
which
got
reverted
so
and
we
got
a
PR
there,
and
this
was
already
I,
don't
know
everywhere
through
API
extensions
and
they
got
reverted.
So
we
had
to
repair
that
to
rebuild
it
like
to
the
revert
of
the
river.
C
It
was
a
rebase
of
the
reward
as
well,
so
it
was
complicated
what
we
still
have
in
kcp
and
we
should
discuss
that
this
conversion
code
by
RCL,
so
basically
a
prototype
from
any
volstein
about
conversion.
C
So
there's
an
object:
I,
don't
remember
the
name,
API
called
version
or
something
so
the
external
object
to
crd
sort
of
JPI
and
resource
schemas,
and
you
can
Define
conversions
just
in
the
objects
without
any
that
hook,
it's
pretty
cool,
but
it's
I
think
it's
something
we
have
to
get
into
Upstream
I'm,
not
sure
there
is
so
much
value
to
continue
that
work
in
kcpe
and
I.
Think
this.
This
big
reverted
change
was
for
that
purpose
right.
C
So
we
could
think
about
that.
After
the
base,
that's
something
we
don't
have
to
decide
now,
but
probably
it's
something
that
we
can
make.
The
viewers
even
simpler
I
can.
C
I
think
it's
it's
more
like
a
priority
question
Upstream.
So
there
are
those
what's
the
name,
admission
policies
or
something
like
that
based
on
CL,
this
was
promoted
to
better
I
think
so
it's
there
was
a
focus.
Basically
and
conversion
is
in
Focus
it's
in
scope,
but
hasn't
been
started.
Building
business
is
a
product
right
hand
Joby,
it's
so
Upstream.
He
is
also
aware
of
that.
So
it
won't
go
through
either
way
like
this
is
a
proposal
or
it's
a
kick.
C
Okay,
yes,
has
nothing
to
do
with
with
kcp
there's,
of
course
a
use
in
kcp,
because
if
you,
if
you
think
about
having
a
multi-regional
kcp,
then
having
a
web
hook,
has
got
to
trip
here
right,
you
have
to
make
it
available
everywhere.
So
that's
why
yeah
reproof
is
not
a
good
fit
so,
and
you
invested
into
this
conversion
by
SEO.
C
So
it's
cool
but
I'm,
not
sure
so
I
have
doubts.
We
should
carry
that
and
the
question
maybe
for
for
you
is
anybody
using
that
at
the
moment.
D
I'm
hearing
about
it
for
the
first
time,
but
this
would
be
essentially
to
convert
between
different
versions
of
an
API
export.
C
Is
no
question
I'm
just
saying
it's
it's
it's
kind
of
misplaced
in
in
kcp.
That's
what
I'm
saying,
because.
C
End
yeah!
Yes,
please
try
again!
So
if
we
have
Cycles,
please
do
so
I
pasted
the
link
to
the
conversion.
If
you
want
to
take
a
look,
so
I
think
the
pr
from
Andy
was
good
Upstream.
It's
not
that
it's
not
useful.
I'm
saying
this
feature,
that's
the
only
reason
that
we
maintain
this
giant
PR
on
our
side,
maybe
not
a
good
idea.
C
C
Yeah
and
yeah
the
simple
answer
about
state,
so
you
can
compile
Cube
API
server
at
the
moment,
so
it
was
basically
our
milestone
and
as
good
as
we
were
able
to
do
it,
we've
fixed
or
we
rebased
the
commits.
So
there
might
be
issues.
C
B
B
C
I
think
this,
this
is
what
I
could
get
it
compiled
right.
It's
not
relevant
for
kcp
I,
believe
so
the
topic
is.
We
have
code
generation
for
informers
for
cluster,
aware
informers
and
there's
a
scoped
version,
so
you
can
scope
cluster
and
format
down
to
one
workspace,
but
what
you
get
out
is
just
I
think
a
dynamic
informal
or
something
like
that.
So
all
those
groups
and
versions
and
resources
are
not
available.
C
So
the
idea
was
to
return
basically
a
shared
in
form
of
factory
which
matches
the
Upstream
interface,
so
you
can
put
it
everywhere
where
Upstream
wants
a
non-scoped,
non-cluster
and
Trauma
I
think
this
works
up
to
the
point
where
you
want
to
handle
keys
or
have
indexes
which
up
for
the
whole
informal,
of
course,
and
the
question
is
whether
I
mean
if
this
has
value
to
scope
down
in
format
when
a
compatible
interface?
C
C
C
B
So
that
and
I
think
when
I
was
rebasing,
there
was
few
other
minor
ones
which
you
can
try
to
get
option
like
a
context
adding
and
things
like
that
in
the
older
paths,
on
a
cube
where
we
still
don't
use
context
around
the
place,
but,
like
honestly
I
expected
it
to
be
way
way
worse,
when
replacing
from
all
the
previous
steps,
so
I
think
it's
it's
moving
to
the
right
direction.
In
general,.
C
That's
just
the
mismatch,
so
something
changed
like
withinformas
again.
This
topic
shows
up
as
well,
so
like
we
have
to
buy.
We
have
to
buy
us
through
a
non-clustering
format
for
priority
and
fairness.
That's
what
I
noticed
was
the
last
thing.
I
think
I'm
not
sure
what
we
did
before.
Maybe
we
had
a
second
informal.
B
D
Okay
and
yeah,
if,
if
there
are
things
coming
up,
as
you
said,
like
distribution,
the
work
I
would
love
to
hear
about
that,
something
that
Asian
people
can
pick
up.
Yeah.
C
B
It's
it's
only
five
minute
lightning
talk,
so
I
bet
most
of
my
presentation
on
gifts
like
showing
CLI
and
showing
how
it
works,
and
the
organizers
exported
my
presentation
to
PDF.
This
means
no
moving
pictures,
so
it
kind
of
improvised
on
the
stage
so
yeah
don't
rely
on
moving
pictures
in
your
flights.
Lessons
Learned.
B
E
It's
called
TMC
yeah,
yeah,
I
I've
done
some
refactoring,
and
now
it's
compiling
you,
you
know
for
I
mean
for
having
it
as
a
layered
version
or
over
kcp.
E
Normal
version,
it
is
walking
except
things
like
alternating,
that's
always
working
but
yeah
for
having
it
as
a
layer.
Thing
I've
done
some
refractorings
and
it's
compiling,
but
they
are
still
quite
a
few
items
that
I
haven't
addressed
so
also
the
things
on
rolling
out
as
a
configuration
replacing
the
the
bootstrapping
of
the
CRT
and
the
access
and
I
I
haven't
even
tested.
Whether
you
know
it's
doing
something
so
I
still
have
got
some
work
on
that
and
well
I
haven't
much
time
in
the
coming
two
weeks.