►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I'm
here
and
we
have
a
quorum
so
we're
duly
constituted
to
do
business.
We
have
we're
going
to
bounce
around
our
agenda
a
little
bit.
Gentlemen,
ladies.
First
on
the
item
on
our
agenda
is
senate
bill
88
senator
gibbons
bill
he's
in
the
back
there.
He
is.
D
Chairman
mills,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
and
the
invitation
to
be
in
front
of
your
committee
and
thanks
to
each
of
you
serving
on
this
committee,
we
do
have
in
front
of
us
senate
bill
88,
something
that
you're
familiar
with
and
have
seen
and
staff
late
yesterday
afternoon,
as
we
were
doing,
one
final
bill
review
found
a
a
technical
correction.
What
I
refer
to
as
a
technical
correction
that
is,
is
available
to
us
as
a
sub.
Mr
chairman,
if
you
would
consider
entertaining
that
sure,
is
there
a
motion
on
the
sub.
D
Think
the
staff
is
going
to
pass
that
out
and
I
can
I
can
very
easily
direct
you
to
what
the
sub
does.
If
you
look
on
the
printed
copy
that
you
have
of
senate
bill
88,
it
strikes
the
language
online
lines,
9
and
10
language.
That
says,
during
which
time
the
general
assembly
shall
act
on
appropriations,
legislation
and
resolutions.
D
It
strikes
that
language
to
make
the
language
conform
with
the
language
in
paragraph
one
effectively,
not
restricting
the
general
assembly
to
solely
appropriations,
legislation
and
resolutions
now
backing
up
from
that.
We
have
a
sub
in
front
of
us.
Mr
chairman,
members
of
the
committee.
What
the
what
this
piece
of
legislation
does,
as
you
recall
from
last
year,
this
is
the
enabling
legislation.
E
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
get
a
little
better
handle
on
this
idea
of
having
the
bills
and
I'm
on
page
one
section:
five
at
the
bottom
page,
one
the
idea
of
having
the
bills
rolling
over
because,
as
I
read
this
and
as
I
understand
the
constitutional
amendment,
a
joint
proclamation
is
kind
of
the
same
ideas
we
think
of
calling
for
a
special
session.
E
What
are
we
here
for?
Why?
Why
a
special
reason?
Why
can't
this
wait
in
senator
thayer's
words,
nine
more
months,
and
obviously
it's
going
to
be
for
a
reason
right.
So
why
would
it
be
for
a
special
reason
that
has
just
come
up?
We
can't
wait
nine
more
months,
but
yet
it's
a
bill
that
had
already
been
filed
in
a
previous
session.
D
Southwest
great
question-
and
you
and
I
had
a
bit
of
this
conversation
just
moments
ago
and
I
referenced
back
to
house
bill
4
of
last
year-
the
language
around
house
bill
4.,
and
I'm
going
to
read
this,
mr
chairman,
if
it
pleases
the
committee,
because
it's
a
little
bit
of
an
insight
into
the
the
workings
of
why
we
would
be
back
sure
the
language
says.
D
D
D
D
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
just
for
clarity.
President
gibbons
this
is
this
is
just
enabling
legislation.
Should
the
constitutional
amendment
fail.
This
is
irrelevant
anyway,
exactly.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
maybe
to
make
senator
southworth
feel
better.
I
was
just
going
through
a
stack
of
notes
from
the
last
session
and
there
were
a
lot
of
bills
there
at
the
end
that
got
almost
through
and
just
at
the
end,
things
were
really
really
crazy.
C
Last
session
with
covet
and
all
the
things
we
were
dealing
with,
and
so
there
were
bills
that
were
on
the
precipice
of
passing
the
senate
that
had
already
come
through
the
house,
and
there
were
bills
on
the
precipice
of
passing
the
house
that
didn't
pass
the
senate
all
you
know
they
had
their
readings
and
leader
rudy,
and
I
were
going
through
multiple
lists
going
into
the
war
room,
deciding
what
we
were
going
to
do,
what
we
weren't
going
to
do,
what
we
had
the
capacity
to
do
what
we
didn't-
and
this
was
one
of
those
bills
that
was
on
that
list
that
didn't
make
it
through,
but
it
nearly
did,
and
but
we
knew
we,
we
had
time
to
come
back
and
do
it
this
session,
because
the
constitutional
amendment
isn't
on
the
ballot
until
this
fall.
A
F
My
vote
explain.
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I'm
going
to
vote,
I
knowing
that
it's
enabling
legislation
and
as
I've
thought
through
the
course
of
this,
and
I
voted
for
the
constitutional
amendment
last
time,
because
I
think
that
people
have
kind
of
demanded
that
based
off
of
the
governor's
actions
previously,
but
I
don't
think
the
constitutional
amendment's
a
good
idea.
F
I
think
this
is
a
march
towards
a
full-time
general
assembly
that
will
get
paid
to
be
a
part-time
general
assembly
and
we
are
opening
doors
that
we
don't
necessarily
want
to
open,
but
but,
in
the
event
it
goes
through.
I
think
this
is
a
good
way
to
handle
it,
and
if
that
is
the
will
of
the
people,
then
that's
what
we
should
react
to
and
that's
what
we
should
be
prepared
to
do
so
I'll
vote.
Mr
chairman,.
A
E
I
believe
I'm
going
to
vote
I
right
now,
and
I
I
don't
like
the
I
don't
like
the
underlying
amendment
language
and
I
understand.
Of
course
the
will
of
the
people
is
what's
important,
but
the
will
of
the
legislature
is
what
hands
them
the
up
or
down
question
the
up
or
down.
Question
has
not
been
well
written,
and
so
as
much
as
I
do
not
like
the
idea
of
having
everything
stay
status
quo
because
there's
a
need,
sometimes
I
don't
feel
like
the
option.
They're
gonna
have
it's
gonna,
be
two
bad
choices.
E
This
fall
for
our
constituents
and
I've
talked
a
number
of
constituents
about
that
and
that's
one
thing.
I
would
like
to
see
this
body
work
on
cleaning
up
this
year,
so
they
have
a
better
ballot
question,
but
should
the
ballot
question
go
through,
as
is
standing
where
we
are
right
now
december
31st
is
the
end
of
the
session
with
no
constraints,
and
that
is
a
huge
problem.
E
The
only
thing
that
stands
between
that
happening
and
where
we
stand
now
is
this
bill,
which
at
least
temporarily
until
we
change
it.
Next
time
sticks
with
the
march
30th
and
april
15th
and
tries
to
cut
down
on
the
number
of
straggler
days.
That
could
happen
at
any
point
under
the
cur
the
new
proposed
constitution.
E
It's
the
only
reason
I
would
vote
for
this,
but
I
am
going
to
work
on
some
of
this
cleanup
language.
I've
talked
with
a
sponsor
about,
and
hopefully
we
can
maybe
get
at
least
a
few
of
the
doodads
cleaned
up
as
best
we
can,
but
I
would
ask
everybody
to
consider
better
language
on
house
bill
4
from
last
year
as
well.
Thank
you.
E
A
C
C
C
G
Looking
at
this
is
the
committee
sub.
Is
that
correct?
Mr
chairman,
as
I've
reviewed
the
committee
stuff,
I
haven't
passed
right
now.
A
A
H
H
I
know
over
in
western
kentucky
and
bowling
green,
never
seen
that
level
of
devastation,
but
let
me
say
that
our
police
departments,
fire
departments,
emergency
management
and
emergency
services
that
we
have
that
respond
in
these
issues
truly
truly
are
exposed
to
a
lot
of
things
that
cause.
What
we
see
is
trauma
post.
H
I
can
tell
you
this
that
I
just
can't
imagine
some
of
the
things
that
they
view
and
then
have
to
go
home
every
day
and
be
a
father
and
a
husband
and
live
normal
lives
within
the
community,
the
dispatchers
that
are
on
the
phones
dealing
with
these
stressful
issues
and
things
that
they
go
through
the
emergency
medical
services
that
things
that
people
see.
Firemen.
I
Thank
you
chairman
mills
and
members
of
the
committee.
I
am
brianna
carroll
director
of
public
affairs
for
the
kentucky
league
of
cities
senate
bill
4
simply
creates
confidentiality,
protections,
64.
senate
bill
64.
What
did
I
say?
Yes,
ms4
senate
bill
4.
senate
bill
64
simply
creates
confidential
confidentiality
protections
for
first
responders
involved
in
peer
counseling
programs
in
our
local
communities.
I
We
want
to
make
sure
that
those
who
choose
such
an
option
do
not
inadvertently
give
up
confidentiality
senate
bill.
64
could
potentially
benefit
tens
of
thousands
of
kentuckians.
There
are
eight
thousand
law
enforcement
officers
and
twelve
thousand
firefighters
in
kentucky.
Our
our
cities
employ
600
ems
and
more
than
300
dispatchers
specialty
ambulance
districts
have
nearly
900
ems
personnel,
and
our
cities
want
to
take
care
of
these
people
both
physically
and
mentally
senate
bill
64
helps
ensure
they
do.
They
can
do
so
without
fear
of
personal
information
becoming
public
knowledge.
I
Communications
shared
during
those
peer
counseling
programs
would
remain
confidential
and
are
not
subject
to
open
records,
except
for
the
following
situations:
an
explicit
threat
of
suicide
threat
to
a
clearly
identified
or
reasonably
identifiable
victim
information
on
the
abuse
or
neglect
of
a
child,
an
adult
or
a
vulnerable
person,
admission
of
criminal
conduct,
information
required
by
law
to
be
expo
to
be
disclosed
and
also
providing
confidential
confidential
peer
support.
Counseling
helps
communities
recruit
and
retain
the
quality
law
enforcement
officers,
firefighters,
ems
and
dispatch
staff.
I
J
J
J
It
also
provides
the
privilege
of
disclosure
in
any
civil
and
criminal
proceedings
with
the
burden
of
loss
of
assistant
chief,
terry
and
the
new
sponsored
program
and
confidentiality
protections.
I
started
working
towards
a
peer
support
program
with
the
city
of
bowling
green
as
the
director
of
human
resources.
I
support
all
of
the
departments,
and
I
knew
from
the
very
beginning
that
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
none
of
our
peer
supporters
or
our
first
responders
were
left
behind
in
august
of
2020.
J
I'd
like
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
what
peer
support
is
and
why
it's
so
important.
I
learned
very
quickly
that
being
a
first
responder
is
a
truly
unique
job.
The
events
that
police
officers
and
firefighters
experience
on
the
job
are
abnormal
to
the
average
person.
The
events
they
experience
are
horrific
and
traumatic.
J
The
u.s
department
of
veteran
affairs
describes
a
traumatic
event
as
one
that
is
shocking
and
dangerous.
They
go
on
to
say
that
sixty
percent
of
men
and
fifty
percent
of
women
will
experience
one
traumatic
event
in
their
life.
On
average,
however,
a
police
officer
or
a
firefighter
will
experience
a
traumatic
event
on
a
regular
basis
throughout
their
career,
potentially
more
than
one
in
a
single
shift
because
of
this
dramatic
difference
from
the
general
population.
J
Finding
a
mental
health
professional
with
first
responder
experience
is
not
common.
We
do
not
have
one
in
bowling
green.
We
do
have
access
to
a
fantastic
one.
In
lexington,
dr
trevor
wilkins,
he
runs
thin
run
thin
line
counseling,
but
due
to
the
geographic
distance,
the
meetings
have
to
be
virtual
and
due
to
his
busy
schedule,
people
have
to
wait
two
to
four
weeks
to
get
an
appointment
with
him
in
preparing.
For
today,
I
asked
dr
wilkins
about
peer
support
programs.
J
The
big
lie
is
that
they
have
to
be
strong
all
the
time
and
any
sign
of
weakness
might
by
peers
or
supervisors
might
be
a
sign
that
they
cannot
do
their
job.
Fear
of
having
their
badge
taken
away
or
being
pulled
off.
The
truck
will
prevent
a
police
officer
or
firefighter
from
seeking
help
if
they
don't
have
the
confidence
that
their
conversations
are
protected
and
confidential.
J
J
Peer
support
provides
education
and
resources
to
first
responders,
as
immediately
as
they
need
it.
There's
no
need
to
make
an
appointment,
no
need
to
worry
if
the
person
is
going
to
understand
what
they
are
going
through
done
correctly.
These
conversations
happen
anonymously,
there's
no
rank
structure
and
peer
support.
J
We
did
the
very
best
that
we
could,
but
I
never
want
our
police
officers
dispatchers
and
firefighters
to
go
through
another
critical
incident
like
that
without
a
plan
and
a
program
in
place
to
help
each
other.
Thank
you
for
your
support
of
our
local
heroes
and
please,
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
C
This
is
a
really
good
bill
thanks.
Mr
chairman,
senator
wilson.
I
spent
a
long
time
talking
about
it
earlier
this
week.
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
senate
bill
64
be
reported,
favorably
motion
same
shall
pass.
Do.
A
E
Yes,
I
was
looking
at
well.
Thank
you
for
this.
I
think
this
is
some
a
lot
of
things
you
said
are
spot
on.
I
was
looking
at
an
issue
relating
to
the
rules
of
evidence
and
I'm
wondering
are
we
going
to
have
any
issues
in
keeping
this
privilege
in
a
courtroom?
I
G
Thank
you.
I
cast
and
I
vote
for
committee
today
to
move
this
bill
along.
I
understand
we
need
help.
I
do
have
some
some
reservations
about
the
absolute
bar
in
this
language
right
now
and
hope
that
we
can
continue
to
work
on
that
just
a
little
bit
to
make
sure
that
that
everyone
is
protected
in
all
circumstances.
As
we
move
this
bill
to
the
floor.
Thank
you.
C
A
I
senate
bill
64
passes
a
letter
is
approved
11-0
and
we
will
be
reported
favorably
to
the
senate.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
A
K
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
committee,
I'm
jimmy
higdon
state
senator,
and
I
have
with
me
bo
craycraft
with
the
judicial
retirement
fund,
the
ppob,
which
many
of
you
are
familiar
with.
We
address
issues
during
the
interim,
and
this
was
on
the
list
of
legislation
that
we
recommended
to
be
heard
this
session
and
so
senate
bill
32.
K
What
it
does
with
the
judicial
reform
retirement
plan
is
is
bring
it
up
to
date
with
some
of
the
changes
we've
already
made
to
kppa
and
and
so
the
if
you
look
at
the
main
thing,
with
any
retirement
bills
or
actuarial
analysis,
and
if
you
look
at
the
actuarial
analysis,
you'll
find
that
one
might
one
of
the
things
that
we've
centered
thayer's
bill
back
in
2013
when
we
created
ppob,
we
had
a
lot
of
issues
that
took
place
prior
to
that
that
we
passed
bills
that
had
a
analysis,
but
they
said
it
was
indeterminable
what
it
would
cost
us
and
indeterminable
was
not
a
status
quo.
K
We
should
never
take
anything
that
you
can't
determine
what
what
the
cost
will
be
and
that's
why
we
have
actuarial
analysis,
but
the
first
three
pages
of
this
bill
are
primarily
what
the
bill
is
is
all
about.
The
the
following
pages
are
all
clean
up
for
the
language
that
was
inserted
with
senate
bill
151
that
was
found
unconstitutional
several
years
ago.
K
So,
if
you
look
through
past
past
page
three,
all
that
language
that
struck
is
is
language
from
151
and
so
section
one
of
this
senate
bill
32,
starting
with
the
23
2023
actuarial
evaluation.
The
unfunded
actuarial
accrued
liability
will
be
amortized
over
a
20-year
closed
period.
K
If
there's
a
surplus,
it'd
be
amortized
over
a
20-year
open
period.
Section
2
administrative
expenses
shall
be
contained
in
a
bi-annual
budget
request
and
sections
3
2
10
deal
with
cleanup,
and
also
it
changes
this
to
a
a
level
dollar
payroll
growth,
which
is,
as
we
all
know,
is
a
good
thing.
If
you
look
on
the
front
page
of
the
actuarial
analysis,
you
see
check
there,
it
makes
makes,
makes
this
system
more
sound,
and
I
think
that's
what
you're
looking
for.
Mr
chairman,
be
glad
to
entertain
any
questions.
A
A
A
L
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
committee,
I'm
pleased
to
testify
today
to
ask
for
your
consideration
on
senate
bill
66
this
past
interim.
I
had
the
pleasure
to
meet
a
constituent
by
the
name
of
stacey
burnett
who's
with
us
here
today.
Burnett's,
a
family
practice
nurse
practitioner
who
reached
out
for
a
meeting
to
consider
drafting
some
legislation
with
regards
to
educational
requirements
for
our
coroners
and
her
story
is
a
bit
of
a
sad
one
in
tragic
and
I'm
gonna.
Let
her
introduce
herself
and
provide
that
story
here
today.
M
Hi
I'm
stacey
burnett.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
our
story
and
considering
this
bill.
This
is
my
husband,
john
burnett.
So
I'll
just
show
you
quickly.
This
was
my
son
nathan
burnett.
He
was
a
senior
at
henry
clay
high
school
and
was
about
to
graduate
on
march
29th.
He
left
for
spring
break
with
his
best
friend's
family
to
go
snowboarding
in
park
city
utah
of
this
past
year
on
march
30th.
It
was
a
beautiful
unusually
warm
day
here
in
kentucky
I'd
taken,
my
youngest
son
to
bernheim
forest.
M
M
Sorry,
I'm
nervous,
so
I
could
see
john's
expression,
which
was
fear
and
shock,
and
he
started
to
pull
back
into
the
driveway
and
our
two
boys
got
out
of
the
car
and
by
time
the
coroner
had
gotten
out
of
the
van
and
came
up
to
the
house.
John
had
come
to
meet
me
and
immediately
we
just
started
asking,
is
he
dead
is
he
did
and
the
coroner
said?
M
I
have
no
details,
you
need
to
call
utah,
and
so
he
had
this
little
piece
of
paper
and
his
business
card
and
it's
the
summit
county
sheriff
in
utah,
and
it
says
john
and
sherry
barnett,
which
were
done
in
stacy,
burnett
and
nathan
and
again
we
kept
saying:
is
he
dead?
Is
he
dead
and
the
coroner
said?
I
have
no
details,
you
have
to
call
utah
and
he
just
walked
away.
M
So
he
left
me
screaming
on
the
front
lawn.
My
two
younger
children
watching
and
john
had
to
compose
himself
and
call
utah.
M
M
I
would
have
been
home
completely
alone
when
the
coroner
showed
up
at
my
house
and
if
nobody
was
there,
I
don't
doubt
that
he
would
have
just
stuck
this
on
our
door
with
his
business
card
because
he
didn't
have
a
phone
number
for
us
on
here.
M
So
when
something
so
terrible
or
so
great
in
your
life
happens,
whether
it
be
the
birth
of
your
child
or
a
death
of
a
child.
You
remember
every
detail
about
that
day
and
that's
much.
It's
etched
in
your
mind
forever
how
you
find
out-
and
I
feel
that
the
way
we
were
informed
was
cold
and
personal
and
professional.
It
caused
a
lot
of
extra
trauma
for
my
two
younger
sons
and
I
feel
like
the
way
we're
notified
robbed
the
acknowledgment
of
the
life
and
importance
that
our
son
meant
to
us.
M
So
I
just
don't
want
any
other
families
to
be
notified.
This
way,
we
want
just
some
basic
standards,
which
are
very
basic,
basically,
that
you
have
to
be
notified
in
person
that
they
need
to
have
details
and
be
able
to
tell
you
what
happened
that
they
stay
with
you
until
you
can
contact
somebody,
but
we
just
don't
want
any
other
families
to
go
through
what
he
went
through.
L
Unfortunately,
members
of
the
committee,
the
burnett
story,
is
not
unique.
On
the
recent
past,
we
also
heard
of
a
death
notification
that
occurred
in
another
kentucky
county
where
the
decedent's
family
was
not
present
when
the
coroner
went
to
their
residence,
so
the
information
was
pinned
to
their
front
door,
and
that
story,
I
think,
made
the
news
after
it
occurred.
I
realize
that
we
can't
legislate
compassion
or
empathy
or
basic
human,
kindness
or
decency.
L
I
also
realize
that
our
coroners
are
elected
officials
that
have
to
answer
for
their
actions.
However,
I
believe
it
is
important
that
we
provide
our
coroners
every
educational
opportunity
to
know
how
to
deliver
the
worst
news
a
family
may
ever
hear
in
their
lifetime.
I
reached
out
to
my
clark
county
coroner
robert
gehart,
and
asked
for
his
input
on
how
this
could
be
accomplished
and
senate
bill.
66
is
a
product
of
that
work.
L
A
L
You,
mr
chairman,
the
bill
basically
adds
language
to
the
coroner
training
that
within
three
years
of
assuming
office,
a
coroner
must
complete
a
course
of
at
least
four
hours
provided
by
doc,
jt.
That
includes
instruction
on
the
grieving
process
and
best
practices
for
providing
a
notice
of
death
to
next
of
kin.
L
If
the
decedent's
next
of
kin,
however,
is
in
their
jurisdiction,
then
they
need
to
notify
emergency
medical
personnel
that
a
notification
is
going
to
take
place
and
confirm
that
they
can
respond
for
the
notification.
They
need
to
arrange
for
another
person
to
accompany
them
either.
A
deputy
coroner
law
enforcement,
clergy,
member
grief,
counselor
or
another
respected
member
of
the
community
to
help
they
have
to
provide
the
notification
orally
and
in
a
respectful
manner,
assist
the
next
of
kin
in
contacting
a
family
or
friend.
L
If
they're
alone
provide
information
regarding
the
handling
of
the
remains
contact,
information
for
the
coroner's
office
and
information
for
grief
counseling,
and
they
also
should
conduct
a
follow-up
communication
within
48
hours,
some
of
the
changes
you
see
in
the
sub
is
the
we
went
from
eight
hours
to
four
hours
of
education
that
was
on
request
from
the
coroner's
association
and
also
the
notification
process.
The
original
bill
had
language
that
it
would
tell
an
ems
or
a
medical
person.
L
They
would
have
to
tell
them
where
they
were
going
and
if
that
happened,
they
were
worried
that
might
get
out
into
social
media
before
they
had
a
chance
to
let
the
next
next
of
kin
know.
So
we
made
sure
that
we
cleaned
that
up
to
tighten
it
where
that
couldn't
be
the
case,
but
that
if
a
medical
problem
occurred
after
they
notified
someone
that
they
would
be
able
to
contact
them
and
let
them
know
where
they're
at.
A
A
L
Thank
you
for
that
question.
As
I
explained,
if
they've
already
taken
the
course,
then
there's
no
need
to
take
it
again
if
they've
already
taken
it,
it's
an
option
for
current
coroners,
but
unfortunately
a
lot
of
the
coroners
don't
choose
this.
They
choose
for
the
things
to
help
with
financial
issues
in
their
office.
So
there's
no
grandfathering
if
they're,
if
they
haven't
taken
the
course
before
they're
going
to
have
to.
L
Well,
I
think
it's
some
of
that's
already
provided
in
some
of
their
initial
training
for
the
coroner's
office,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
four-hour
course.
So,
there's
already
a
powerpoint,
that's
provided
by
the
coroner's
association.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
being
provided
and
for
everybody
that's
coming
in.
G
My
vote
and
explain
mr
chairman.
Yes,
you
may
cass
and
I
vote
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all.
I
know
how
hard
it
is
to
testify
about
personal
matters
and
for
you
all
to
have
the
courage
to
do
this
and
to
turn
your
pain
and
to
action
and
prevent
other
people
from
going
through
it.
You
should
be
commended.
Thank
you.
N
Mr
chair
explain
my
I
vote.
Yes,
she
may
I
vote
I
and
senator
alvarado
thank
you
for
bringing
this
bill.
Thank
you
to
the
witnesses
for
testifying
today.
I
know
I've
talked
to
you,
there's
always
the
concern,
especially
with
deputy
coroners,
how
hard
it
is
to
find
deputy
corners.
However,
I
think
you've
done
a
good
job.
I
think
this
is
pretty
reasonable.
N
You
know
not
not
way
too
long
and
having
constituents
who
somewhat
similar
stories
just
hearing
firsthand.
It's
definitely
a
need
in
our
commonwealth.
So
thank
you.
B
A
I
vote
I
and
senate
bill
66
passes
or
is
approved
eleven
to
zero,
and
thank
you
to
the
burnett's
for
your
testimony
and
senator
alvarado
today.
If
there
are
not
any
other
business
before
the
committee,
we
standard.