►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Along
with
this
one,
so
some
of
the
members
aren't
able
to
be
here.
We
do
not
have
a
quorum,
but
we
do
not
have
any
minutes
to
approve,
and
this
is
informational
hearing
only.
So
we
will
proceed
in
a
lot
of
that
fact.
A
So
I
want
to
welcome
everyone
this
morning
and
I'm
now
going
to
call
the
to
order
the
budget
review
subcommittee
on
general
government
and
they
asked
everyone-
please
silence
any
type
of
noisemaking
devices,
your
phone
specifically
or
place
it
on
airplane
mode,
so
that
it
does
not
interfere
with
our
electronics
devices
that
we're
using
to
communicate
the
meeting
to
others.
A
If
you're
attending
this
meeting
remotely
and
would
like
to
ask
questions,
please
notify
us
in
the
chat
room
that
you
have
a
question
to
ask,
and
I
would
also
ask
that
you
please
leave
your
devices
on
mute
until
you
do
desire
to
speak,
to
prevent
us
from
getting
any
background
noises
and
with
that
being
said,
I'll,
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
roll.
B
A
Present
in
the
room,
all
right,
then
we
will
move
forward
and
the
issue
that
we
have
before
us
today
is
to
deal
with
the
budget
requests
from
the
state
board
of
elections
related
to
the
e-polling
system,
and
the
update
is
on
what's
going
on
with
that
system.
So,
as
we
begin,
I
would
like
to
ask
any
and
all
the
presenters
that
they
state
their
names
their
titles
for
the
record
and
then
raise
your
right
hands.
So
karen
I'll
begin
with
you.
D
E
A
D
I
know
that
everyone
has
a
lot
on
their
plate
today,
so
we
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
come
here
and
want
to
be
respectful
of
your
time,
so
we'll
try
to
move
through
our
request
for
funding
to
bring
our
e-pull
book
system
engineer.
Mark
ott
is
with
us
and
system
engineer.
Mark
ott
is
with
us
and
tom
watson,
who
is
also
a
system
architect
both
with
sbe,
unfortunately,
rachel
poynter.
Her
name
is
on
here.
She
was
not
able
to
be
with
us
today.
D
So
we
want
to
start
out
by
saying
we're
here
again
for
administration
of
the
e-poll
books
to
be
moved
to
sbe
as
background
the
paper
rosters
were
what
people
used
to
sign
in
to
vote
to
be
eligible
to
vote.
They
would
show
their
eligibility
present
their
id
information
paper.
Rosters
are
a
slower
way
to
sign
in
and
there
is
no
ability
to
stop
double
voting.
D
D
There
are
no
vote
centers
without
e-poll
books
and
now
h.b
574,
which
went
into
law
in
june
of
well
june.
29Th
of
2021
county-wide
vote
centers
are
approved
and
require
real-time
knowledge
of
a
voter.
Checking
in
paper.
Rosters
do
not
allow
this
e-poll
books
are
not
a
luxury.
Now
they
are
a
requirement
if
a
county
has
vote
centers.
Otherwise
there
will
be
no
vote
centers
without
e-poll
books.
D
A
F
F
Thank
you
all
for
having
us
here
today.
We
appreciate
it,
it's
quite
an
honor
for
us.
We
we
take
serving
the
commonwealth
very
seriously
at
state
board
of
elections,
and
we
we
thank
you
in
advance
for
hearing
us
out
just.
I
will
keep
this
very
brief
so
that
there
can
be
questions.
I'm
sure
you'll
have
some.
F
F
Once
I
got
mark
on
the
team
mark-
and
I
have
worked
on
enterprise
systems
around
the
world
with
large
corporations
mark-
and
I,
together
with
our
our
team
of
our
small
team
of
programmers,
we
do
believe
we
can
do
this
with
the
proper
funding
and
we
do
believe
that
the
administration
is
right
and
we
probably
should
so
we're
here
to
lay
out
a
few
reasons,
and
then
you
can
ask
any
questions
you
may
have.
F
The
first
reason
is
a
compelling
one:
it's
data
control
by
having
it
in
house
the
data
passes
through
fewer
hands.
That
sounds
simple,
but
it's
extremely
important
and
I'll
get
into
that
a
little
bit
in
a
minute
archiving.
You
all
know
how
important
archiving
data
is
for
the
state.
There's
rules,
regulations,
laws
with
a
vendor
involved
that
archiving
process
is,
is
clunky
at
best.
They
do
a
good
job.
I
have
no
problem
with
vendors,
but
they
can't
do
it
as
well
as
we
can
in-house,
and
that
leads
to
reporting
and
monitoring.
F
We
are
elections
and
there
is
a
lot
of
reporting.
There
are
literally
hundreds
of
reports
that
are
generated
before,
during
and
after
an
election
by
having
it
in
house
that
reporting
is
simpler.
We
can
automate
it,
we
can
make
sure
it's
correct
and
monitoring
also
is
a
continuous
thing,
especially
before,
and
during
an
election
there
is
monitoring
of
data
on
many
levels.
Next
slide,
please
that
leads
us
right
into
security.
We
are
federally
mandated
to
have
the
highest
standards
we
did
before.
We
became
critical
infrastructure.
F
F
So
again,
regarding
security,
the
data
passes
through
fewer
hands
and
that's
important,
because
the
the
security
is
completely
on
us.
That's
a
huge
responsibility,
but
but
we
accept
that
responsibility.
We're
not
perfect.
No
system
is
perfect,
but
we
take
it
extremely
seriously.
On
behalf
of
the
commonwealth
and
you'll
see
in
parentheses,
state
networks
again,
nothing
against
vendors.
Vendors
are
wonderful,
but
some
of
their
systems
are
not
on.
F
Behind
the
firewalls
and
protection
layers
that
are
included
in
the
state
network
by
bringing
this
in-house
all
aspects
of
it
are
on
the
state
network
and
under
our
umbrella
of
security.
So
it's
layered
security
that
is
is
of
a
much
higher
nature.
Next
slide.
Please,
flexibility
is
extremely
important.
F
We
have
to
have
the
ability
to
adapt,
grow
and
respond
to
emergencies
like
covet.
2020
was
a
horrible
year
in
a
lot
of
ways.
For
many
many
people,
it
was
extremely
difficult
for
elections.
F
It
was.
It
was
difficult
for
all
of
us
at
all
levels
in
government,
but
we
were
able
to
make
it
through
with,
I
think,
very
clear
success,
because
we
already
had
done
the
entire
vrs
system
and
ancillary
systems
in-house.
F
F
We
grew
new
systems
we
adapted
to
that
situation
and
I'm
very
proud
of
the
state
board
of
elections
and
and
the
secretary
of
state
and
the
governor,
and
you
folks.
We
made
it
through
that
and
that's
because
of
flexibility
and
having
this
system
in-house
gives
us
that
flexibility
next
slide.
Please
this
one
is
not
in
my
wheelhouse,
but
I'm
going
to
mention
it
and
then,
if
you
have
questions,
others
can
pick
that
up.
F
Basically,
the
bid
system
has
worked
really
well
for
kentucky.
Obviously
it's
it's
not
about
a
dislike
of
that
or
anything
it's
that
in
this
particular
situation.
F
It
does
give
the
board
a
little
less
control
over
vendor
selection,
and
there
are
situations
where
we
could
end
up
with
multiple
vendors,
such
in
different
situations
like
that,
and
that
goes
back
to
the
passing
through
fewer
hands
and
the
security
next
slide,
and
the
last
thing
it's
not
the
last
reason
we
have
many
reasons
we
just
wanted
to
limit
it
and
then
find
out
what
your
thoughts
were.
F
The
last
one
is
agency
expertise
by
having
an
in-house
staff
of
dedicated
people
who
understand
the
laws
who
understand
kentucky
the
commonwealth,
who
have
the
tools
and
the
institutional
knowledge
to
deal
with
this
and
other
things.
That's
that's
why
brs
the
voter
registration
system
is
in-house.
F
It
allows
for
real-time
analysis
because
again
we're
not
having
to
go
through
the
layers
of
cost,
and
you
know
the
different
vendors,
so
we
can
troubleshoot
and
customize
and
you'll
notice
there.
It
says
customization
required
when
working
with
120
counties
that's
important
because.
F
I
worked
for
large
corporations
and
and
was
basically
around
teams
that
were
vendors
and
they
do
the
best
they
can
and
our
vendors
are
excellent.
We
love
working
with
them,
however,
they
can
never
understand
the
needs
of
120
different
counties,
they're
all
very
different.
Some
of
them
have
tiny
budgets,
some
of
them
have
huge
budgets
and
they
each
have
unique
situations.
F
By
bringing
this
system
in-house,
we
can
accommodate
not
only
large
counties,
but
the
small
counties
who
are
struggling
with
things.
We
can
work
with
them
to
customize
solutions
that
solve
their
particular
problems.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
In
a
nutshell,
that
is
our
basic
premise
on
this
and
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
karen.
A
Thank
you,
tom,
by
the
way
you
and
mark
come
very
highly
recommended
by
the
members
of
the
board
karen
and
her
crew.
They
speak
very
highly
of
you
and
I
can
see
why
now,
but
karen
thank
you.
D
I
mean,
I
think,
that
you
know
listening
to
tom
hearing
our
reasons
for
in-house.
I
think
you
also
understand
that
we
absolutely
cannot
have
elections
fail
in
kentucky.
We
have
an
excellent
team
that
brought
us
through
many
years
of
elections
in
particularly
2020,
which
was
a
significant
year
and
many
changes
that
year.
D
This
has
been,
you
know,
proposed
and
is
ongoing
in
other
states,
not
just
kentucky
this
isn't.
We
are
not
an
island
on
considering
this
going
forward,
but
we
hope
that
we've
been
able
to
answer
your
questions
or
at
least
give
you
some
more
information
about
why
we
feel
moving
this
poll
book
administration
in-house
is
is
key
for
kentucky
and
the
commonwealth,
and
again
it
would
be
a
domestic
service
in
the
commonwealth.
A
Sure,
thank
you
karen
and
you
know
a
couple
questions
here
and
and
before
I
begin
with
with
questions
just
a
quick
statement,
keep
in
mind.
These
e-poll
books
have
been
what
was
used
in
the
last
election
cycle
here
in
kentucky.
Yes,.
A
And
there
was
no
foreign
entity
that
had
any
contact
or
control
of
our
ebooks
here
in
kentucky,
just
just
for
clarification
purposes
out
there,
and
this
is
all
about
providing
a
safe,
secure
election
contrary
to
a
lot
of
the
rhetoric,
that's
out
there.
So
I
I
do
have
a
few
questions
and
representative
donahue
has
a
question
I'll
I'll.
Let
him
begin
with
his
question.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thanks
for
the
presentation
tom,
if
I
may
call
you
tom,
representative,
donny
here,
there's
quite
mentioned
quite
a
bit.
First
of
all,
y'all
do
a
terrific
job,
okay
and
and
the
folks
that
work
in
my
district
are
near
and
dear
to
my
heart,
they're
great
folks.
They
take
it
with
pride
and
and
are
very,
very
labor-intensive
what
they
do,
but
they
do
a
terrific
job.
C
So
I
want
to
say
that
first,
the
conversation
was
meant
to
mention
vendors
and
I
in
in
the
previous
jobs
I
used
to
do
I
dealt
with
vendors,
a
lot
and
and
the
use
of
vendors
to
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
we
usually
we
use
those
folks
because
they
can
provide
the
technology
or
the
equipment
or
the
some
of
the
resources
that
we
don't
have
available.
So
what
we're
looking
for
is
to
bring
this
in-house
and
do
it
ourselves,
and
if
we
do
that,
can
you
give
me
the
pros
and
cons
of
that?
F
Long
term
we
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
We
have
given
you
numbers
that
we
think
are
accurate,
but
one
of
my
concerns
is
that
we
undersell
the
cost
it's.
This
is
not
a
project,
it
has
to
be
about
cost.
We
are
trust
me.
We
are
very
conscious
of
cost.
We
we
are
on
a
shoestring
budget
have
been
for
years
and
and
we
we
are
very
conscious
of
that,
but
this
particular
project
is
its
overall
goal
is
not
to
save
cost.
Maybe
we
will
later
it's,
but
it's
going
to
cost.
F
Probably
you
know
a
million
dollars
for
the
first
year
and
then
six
hundred
fifty
seven
hundred
thousand
after
that,
because
to
actually
support
this
kind
of
growth.
We
have
to
have
that.
As
karen
said,
elections
are
something
that
can't
fail
and-
and
I
always
rush
to
say
that
I'm
I'm
not
guaranteeing
100-
that
we
that
things
can't
fail.
Sometimes
they
do
systems
break,
but
I
can
guarantee
that
we
take
that
extremely
seriously.
We
have
the
know-how,
we
use
triple
redundancy
and-
and
so
there
are,
I
don't
mean
to
go
too
far
afield.
F
Let
me
be
more
direct
in
my
answer.
One
of
the
big
concerns
has
been
vendors
and
we've
seen
this
in
kentucky.
They
they
sometimes
go
under.
They
sometimes
move.
They
sometimes
come
under
some
kind
of
influence
that
one
party
or
another
doesn't
approve
of
so
that
kind
of
continuity
is
also
something
that's
been
of
huge
concern,
not
not
so
much
to
me,
I'm
in
the
I.t
realm,
but
to
the
administration-
and
I
understand
that
I
understand
that
concern,
and
especially
the
counties
they're
concerned
about
that.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
may
I
have
one
more.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment.
I'm
here.
I
support
you
folks,
110,
okay,
I
think
y'all
do
a
tremendous
job,
I'm
proud
of
the
job
you've
done.
If
you
look
across
the
nation
what
the
state
of
kentucky
has
done
and
I'm
here
I
just
wanted
to
figure
what
kind
of
dollar
figure
we're
looking
at
as
I
go
out
in
and
sing
your
praises,
okay
to
make
sure
we
move
forward.
So
anything
I
can
do
along
with
my
fellow
legislators.
A
A
F
I'll
I'll
answer
that
real
quickly
karen,
if,
if
you
want
to
chime
in
I,
we
do,
we
do
extremely
thorough
analysis
from
an
I.t
perspective.
We
look
at
security,
we
look
at
controls,
we
look
at
adaptability,
we
look
at
redundancies,
we
look
at
cost.
We
look
at
all
those
things
we
do
compare
to
other
states
and
there
is
somewhat
of
a
movement
moving
a
lot
of
this
stuff
in
house
in
other
states.
F
Mark
would
you
mind
if,
if
mark
spoke
a
little
bit
sure,
because
I
think
I
think
mark
you
could
add
to
this.
If
you
wouldn't
mind.
A
E
All
right!
Well,
if
I
understand
the
question
correctly
and
the
the
amount
of
analysis,
I
think
our
analysis
is
not
in
the
financial
level
other
than
what's
presented
in
terms
of
the
cost
that
we
hope
you
can.
E
E
What
in
terms
of
like
what
tom
was
a
was
alluding
to
or
describing,
I
think,
one
of
the
biggest
problems
that
we
have
right
now
and
is
is
one
of
I
would
put
it
from
my
perspective,
staying
out
of
the
staying
out
of
the
papers
right
and
that
all
lends
itself
back
to
perceptions,
security,
the
ability
to
be
flexible
and
when
there
are
issues
that
come
up
during
the
particular
election,
there
are
always
going
to
be
system
failures,
as
time
mentioned,
various
areas
where
we
have
to
be
able
to
adapt
and
change.
E
Both
hardware
maybe
make
corrections
to
issues
that
people
come
across
in
terms
of
I
hate
to
say,
the
idea
of
bugs,
but
things
that
come
up
that
don't
work
because
of
a
new
something
that
was
missed
and
maybe
even
some
and
greater
detail
on
what
wasn't
even
conceived
at
the
time.
E
I
think
that's
paramount,
and
that's
one
of
the
issues
that
I
think
that
we
have
when
we
deal
with
vendors
externally,
we
have
to
accept
the
systems
they
have
or
in
their
own
good
graces.
They
do
some
modifications
within
that
limited
budget
that
we
have
to
make
changes
to
their
system,
which
they're
selling
to
many
many
states
for
many
many
counties
and
so
from
a
financial
analysis.
E
It's
only
looking
at
it
from
the
standpoint
of
what
we
think
we
can,
what
we
believe
we
can
do,
comparing
that
to
what's
out
there,
the
I
guess
the
current
bidding
process
when
the
current
vendor
was
selected
is
was
one
of
the
best
at
the
moment,
but
to
modify
it
and
to
integrate
it
more
into
our
system
would
just
drive
that
cost
up.
E
A
A
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it
next,
I
would
ask
it's
my
understanding
that
the
board
of
elections
was
was
given
money
from
the
from
the
federal
side
of
things
to
pay
for
the
current
operating
system
and
equipment
that
kentucky's
using
and
what
will
the
future
funding
source
be
if
we
develop
a
new
system
and
we
bring
this
all
in-house,
where,
where
does
the
funding
come
from.
D
So
we
probably
have
about
a
four
weight
four
year
runway
using
federal
dollars,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
but
as
we
transition
to
a
say,
a
system
like
this
we're
hoping
we
have
the
opportunity
to
explain
further
the
other
maintenance
areas
and
the
the
needs
at
sbe
with
it
going
forward
on
particularly
maintenance
of
vrs
absentee
portal,
because
those
have
been
sustained
as
well
as
rit
staff
through
federal
java
dollars.
A
A
Another
question
would
be
one
of
the
part
of
your
all's
budget
request
was
from
was
for
hiring
additional
programmers,
and
do
you
have
the
capacity
to
hire
enough
programmers
to
build
out
this
operating
system?
This
building
out
operating
systems
is
not
a
simple
task.
It's
a
major
major
undertaking
and
you
know,
do
you
have
the
capacity
to
hire
enough
programmers
to
do
that.
A
D
F
Yeah,
I
can.
I
can
speak
to
that,
it's
an
excellent
question
and
we
we
believe
that
we
can.
If,
if
this
plan
were
approved,
we
can
put
that
into
place
over
a
multi-year
timeline
test.
It
make
sure
it
didn't.
You
know
the
plan
includes
equipment,
our
our
equipment
is
housed
at
cot.
We
have
an
agreement
with
them;
they
protect
it
and
provide
redundancy,
they
don't
touch
it.
F
We
do
that
and
it
has
to
be
that
way
because
of
our
security
needs,
and
so
yes,
we
do
believe
that,
with
this
budget,
we
would
be
able
to
have
the
people
we
need
to
build.
This.
F
F
I
think
that
we're
very
accurate
in
this
in
this
in
this
accounting
that
we've
put
together
for
that,
but
I
think
the
larger
question
that
you
may
be
getting
at
is
even
if
that
happens,
and
and
forgive
me
for
going
there,
but
even
if
that
happens
in
four
or
five
years
most
of
our
programmers.
We
don't
have
that
many
by
the
way,
there's
only
a
few
of
us.
You
know
we're
going
to
have
to
go
because
there
won't
be
federal
money
to
sustain
us.
F
So,
even
if
this
plan
is
approved
which-
and
I
do
think
we
can
do
this
long
term
there-
there
are
some
real
budgetary
problems.
A
That
brings
up
another
concern,
obviously
is-
and
this
is
just
me
speaking
out
loud
if
we
bring
this
in-house
and
they
develop
the
program,
we
got
to
make
sure
we
keep
people
like
tom
on
staff,
that
we
can
keep
this
program
up
and
off
and
up-to-date
technology
is
constantly
changing.
So
you
know
that's
definitely
a
concern
that
we
got.
We
have
to
make
sure
to
do,
but
while
we're
on
the
programmers,
let
me
let
me
ask
this
question
as
well:
what
would
the
programmers
role
we?
A
We,
I
guess
we
kind
of
figure
out
what
the
role
is
going
to
be
on
on
election
day,
but
what
would
their
role
be
on
election
day
and
then
on
a
non-election
day?
What's
the
role
of
the
programmers.
F
F
We
are
senior
software
engineers
and
we
come
from
similar
backgrounds,
and
we've
worked
together
at
like
lexmark
in
the
past,
we're
very
lucky
to
have
mark
that
kind
of
expertise
is
not
easy
to
find
or
to
secure,
and
so
I
we
don't
necessarily
need
more
system,
architects.
F
We
have
a
couple
of
good,
we
have
another
senior
joe
songer
and
he's
excellent
and
we
have
a
mid-level
and
alan
hess,
and
then
we
have
a
junior
and
trust
me.
There's
plenty
of
work
for
them
to
do
so.
Those
that
are
in
this
budget
are
people
who
their
their
programmers
probably
mid
to
senior
level.
F
Who
will
take
the
architecture
and
the
plans
that
mark
and
I
put
together
and
help
us
to
implement
that,
so
they
will
help
us
build
the
server
network,
the
all
the
various
parts
of
the
software,
it's
very
complicated
to
work
with
the
devices
themselves.
F
I
I
could
go
into
details
that
you
don't
need,
but
there
are
many.
This
is
a
very
complex
thing.
Many
moving
pieces
working
with
the
you
know,
can
it
be
on
an
an
ipad
and
another
device.
All
of
those
things,
upgrading,
locking
those
devices,
so
their
jobs
will
be
a
mixture
of
coding
to
standard
for
what
we
need
and
also
we
may
try
to
get
some
content
experts
in
areas
like
apple
working
with
apple
technologies,
not
that
we
all
can't
do
that.
F
But
again,
that's
that's
a
moving
target,
it's
very
complex,
so
they
would
need
to
be
pretty
senior
people
at
the
start
for
at
least
the
first
couple
years
once
that's
over,
then
it's
mostly
support
making
sure
that
each
county
is
ready
for
an
election.
What
are
their
particular
problems?
You
wouldn't
believe
the
numbers
of
problems
that
are
unique
to
each
county,
so
we
have
to
have
people.
F
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
you
can't
just
get
somebody
and
throw
them
on
a
desk
and
say:
hey
answer
the
needs
for
you
know
for
fayette
county
they
they
can't
do
that.
They
don't
know
those
people,
they
don't
know
the
clerks,
they
don't
know
the
deputies,
they
don't
know
the
laws,
they
don't
know
the
systems
so
working
with
this
kind
of
system
or
these
kinds
of
systems
is
complicated.
F
So
you
have
to
have
good
people
who
care
and
who
can
respond
to
those
situations
under
our
auspices
we
take
care
of
the
larger
picture
and
so
to
get
specific
on
election
day.
It's
handling
everything
that
comes
up
immediately
and
there
are
hundreds
of
things
that
come
up
technology
issues,
people
issues
so
surrounding
an
election.
It's
it's
constant.
It's
it's
a
constant
endless
flow
of
problems,
and
we
accept
that.
That's
what
we
do.
You
know
we
we've
got
to
get
the
election
done.
F
F
They
have
to
learn
what
that
equipment
means
where
it's
stored,
how
you
maintain
it?
We
do
in-person
trainings,
we
do
trainings,
we
have
them.
Come
to
us,
and
sometimes
we
go
to
them,
put
on
regional
trainings,
so
so
training
customization
troubleshooting.
That
is
an
ongoing
thing.
We
work
for
months
prior
to
an
election
to
make
sure
the
counties
are
ready
to
get
their
data,
lined
up
to
make
sure
that
each
precinct
is
ready,
and
it's
not
just.
I
t
it's
the
whole
sbe.
So
I
I
hope
that
answered
your
question
somewhat.
It's
it.
F
It
isn't
a
situation
where
there's
ever
a
day,
that's
for
idle
hands!
It's
it's
a
24
7
operation,
really.
A
D
That
has
come
up.
We
actually
have
a
work
group
with
the
state
board
of
elections,
the
board
members,
and
we
are
looking
into
those
areas.
We've
had
one
meeting
we'll
have
another
chairman,
chandler
appointed
two
members.
We
have
a
county
clerk
representative
secretary
of
state
represents
and
looking
into
that
opportunity
that
the
I
guess
what
you're
saying
is
an
e-pull
book
vendor
other
than
if
it's
us
or
the
current
tax,
and
we
are
working
with
that
as
a
work
group
through
the
board
to
develop.
A
D
I'll
defer
that
to
tom,
but
I
would
answer
yes.
If
it's
our
system,
they
respond
right
now
to
the
current
vendor.
If
there
are
questions
and
they
don't
reach
the
current
vendor,
tom's
team
is
right:
there
ready
to
respond
to
them
as
well.
A
Thank
you.
That's
that's
good
enough.
I
thank
you
all
for
coming
today.
I
do
like
the
the
fact
that
you're
exploring
the
possibilities
of
moving
things
in-house.
I
think
it
brings
a
lot
of
options
of
security.
A
That
is
a
big
concern
right
now
with
people
across
the
country
and
what
we
want
our
folks
to
know
here
in
in
the
commonwealth
is
we
do
provide
safe,
secure
elections.
This
past
election
was
a
safe,
secure
election
in
the
commonwealth.
I
have
no
doubts
that,
and
so
we
appreciate
you
all
coming,
but
I
do
want
to
give
an
opportunity.
We
have
some
folks,
I
think,
from
the
secretary
of
state's
office
here
today
and
maybe
from
the
clerks.
Do
we
have
a
clerk
here
today?
A
Yeah,
I
thought
and
do
you
all
have
anything
you
all
want
to
add
or
need
to
add?
Okay,
if
not
karen
your
folks,
anybody
have
anything
else.
They
want
to
add.
F
D
A
Well,
we
certainly
thank
you
all
for
coming
and
presenting
today
try
to
do
everything
we
can
to
help
you
all
to
do
your
jobs,
it's
about
providing
you
the
resources,
and
in
this
case,
that
resource
is
funding,
and
so
I
appreciate
you
coming
and
anything
we
can
do
to
be
of
help.
Please
let
us
know
with
that.
If
there's
nothing
else,
then
to
come
before
the
committee,
we
shall
be
adjourned.
Thank
you.