►
From YouTube: Government Contract Review Committee - (5-10-22)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
Next
order
of
business
is
consideration
in
the
agenda,
including
the
deferred
list,
personal
service
contract
list,
the
psc
amendment
list
memorandum
of
agreement
list
the
memoranda
of
agreement,
amendment
list
and
kentucky
entertainment
incentive
program
agreement
list,
except
for
those
items
selected
for
further
review.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
consider
the
contracts
reviewed
without
objection.
A
A
E
I'm
voting
no
on
this
today
there
are
just
a
number
of
contracts
throughout
and
it's
just
too
many
to
call
individually
relating
to
voting
equipment
specifically,
and
there
could
be
others,
but
that's
the
one
I
want
to
bring
out
today
voting
equipment
in
a
lot
of
our
counties,
obviously
we're
getting
into
election
season.
E
It's
not
the
first
time
we've
bought
these
machines.
It's
not
going
to
be
the
last
apparently,
but
it
will
be
the
last
soon.
Hopefully,
I'm
looking
forward
to
that,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
to
spend
millions
of
our
taxpayers
dollars
or
prove
that
on
machines
that
we
know
are
not
secure
and
claim
that
they
are
certainly
there's
a
need
for
better
election
processing
in
the
state.
But
it's
definitely
not
the
answer.
Thank
you.
E
A
A
Aye
motion
carries
okay
in
order
to
accommodate
an
agency,
the
first
item
on
the
pulled
list
with
economic
development
office
of
the
secretary,
and
they
are
number
94
and
95
on
the
routine
psc
green
list.
Representatives
are
here
you're
already
moving
forward.
Please
identify
yourself
for
the
record.
A
A
G
G
So
we
have
been
working
with
him.
He
has
helped
us
with
various
projects.
We
have
several
german
companies
here
that
they've
helped
us
with
with
locating
as
well
as
additional
expansions
over
in
euro
and
asia.
We
have
in
japan,
mike
takahashi.
We've
had
his
contract
as
well
and
again,
especially
because
of
the
pandemic
in
kovitt,
he's
been
able
to
help
with
us
with
projects.
I
know
in
the
past.
G
During
the
pandemic,
we
worked
on
a
big
project,
that's
going
to
be
locating
in
louisville
house
foods,
it's
a
tofu
company
and
that's
going
to
also
be
helping
with
ag
because
they're
going
to
be
sourcing
some
of
their
products
from
locally
here
in
kentucky
as
well.
So
we
they,
they
have
been
managing
the
offices,
we
work
with
them.
G
They
help
find
projects
and
then
they
kind
of
work
with
our
project
managers
here
in
the
united
states,
so
that
we
can
perform
the
site
visits
when
representatives
from
japan
or,
if
they're
here
in
the
united
states
visit
kentucky
they
transition
and
work
with
our
project
managers
here
locally,
so
that
they
don't
have
to
travel.
Sometimes
they
do
travel,
but
that's
kind
of
how
these
these
two
contracts
work.
They
are
our
representatives
overseas
and
working
with
the
companies.
I
Thank
you
appreciate
the
additional
documentation
that
you
gave
us,
particularly
with
regard
to
mr
vice.
I'm
surprised,
I
didn't
see
the
same
thing
for
mr
takahashi.
I
You
know
I
I
like
what
you
give
me
that
during
his
tenure
we've
seen
14
000
jobs,
4.6
billion
in
new
capital
investments,
but
we
didn't
see
comparable
numbers
for
the
further
contract,
and
you
know
I'm
not
questioning
whether
we
need
these.
We
certainly
do,
but
I'm
just
curious,
particularly
long-standing
relationships
that
are
so
source.
I
I
Is
that
directly
related
to
him
or
is
it
just
natural
growth,
some
of
the
companies
we
already
have
here
so
again,
I'm
not
really
questioning
the
integrity
or
value
of
either
one
of
these
individuals.
Just
how
do
you
measure
their
effectiveness
in,
even
though
it's
a
long-standing
relationship?
How
do
you
know
someone
else
might
not
be
more
effective
in
those
roles?
So
again,
I
guess
I'm
just
looking
at
the
process.
H
The
project
managers
here
in
business
development
work
with
them
really
in
a
really
well
coordinated
manner,
so
it
is,
it
is
fairly
evident,
I
guess,
to
the
project
managers
and
the
day-to-day
business
development
team
as
to
whether
there
is
assistance
being
provided
there
and
there
are
valuable
services
being
provided
there,
whether
that
be
outreach
overseas,
whether
that
be
event,
translation
services,
whether
that
be
navigating
business,
culture
and
the
formalities
of
foreign
business
entities
etc.
So
again,
we
completely
understand
that
concern.
It's
a
very
valid
concern
do
know
that
we
work
hand-in-hand
with
them.
H
G
As
well
as
they
have
a
weekly
one-on-one
meeting
with
our
cabinet
secretary
to
talk
about
the
activities
and
the
projects
that
they're
working
and
so
if
the
performance
is
not
there,
we
don't
wait,
we
could
we
kind
of
communicate
back
with
them
as
to
okay.
You
know
this
you've
been
doing
a
lot
of
trade
shows,
but
now
we
want
to
have
some
more.
I
I'm
curious
how
we
cover
the
rest
of
the
world
because
it
looks
like
these
generally
are
covering
europe
and
in
southeast
asia.
But
how
do
we
cover
the
rest
of
the
world?
There.
H
Is
a
international
affairs
director
out
of
the
cabinet
for
economic
development
and,
of
course,
the
business
development
team
to
try
and
capture
some
of
those
opportunities
I
mean.
Would
we
like
to
see
additional
coverage
based
on
sort
of
geography?
Yes,
we
of
course
need
more
operational
resources
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
in
the
meantime,
that's
how
we
do
it.
It's
not
like.
H
We
just
serve
those
or
focus
on
those
two
geographic
areas,
every
other
opportunity
we
do
our
best
to
capture
from
here
from
from
kentucky
from
the
cabinet-
and
that
is
that
includes
you,
know,
outreach
it
includes
attending
conference.
It
includes
assistance
to
trade
shows.
I
know
we're
getting
ready
for
select
usa,
which
is
kind
of
a
major
event
in
dc
to
meet
with
foreign
businesses
from
all
over
the
world
who
are
interested
in
investing
here.
G
So
for
the
renewals,
for
that
we
do
not
do
an
rfp,
we
do
the
not
practical
to
bid,
because
we
have
been
working
with
these
vendors
for
for
a
while,
I
know.
Historically,
at
the
beginning
there
was,
I
believe
in
rfp,
and
that's
when
we
we
had
responses
and
interested
vendors
and
then
they
continue
to
work
with
us.
I
know
in
asia
and
japan
and
japan
for
a
while.
We
also
had
for
years.
Jiro
hashimoto
was
also
one
of
our
vendors
for
quite
some
time
as
well.
G
When
we,
the
difficulty
sometimes
with
the
rfps,
is,
I
know
when
there
was
an
rfp
there.
There
was
a
visit
to
japan
to
sit
down
to
actually
do
one-on-one
interviews
with
the
various
vendors
and
then
that
that
has
happened
a
couple
of
times,
but
because
of
the
working
relationship
and
the
performance
that
we
have
with
mr
takahashi
as
well
as
mr
vice.
H
I
I
would
say
that
there
are
some,
not
practical,
practical
sort
of
logistical
challenges
with
this
particular
operations
again,
because
we're
not
talking
about
vendors
that
are
even
just
by
virtue
of
what
they
do
here
in
the
united
states
right
they
are
in
foreign
territories,
so
we're
looking
at
individuals
that
are
uniquely
qualified
to
really
bridge
that
gap
between
kentucky
business
culture
and
a
foreign
culture.
So
that's
difficulty
number
one
difficulty
number
two,
of
course,
is
the
cost
of
what
it
would
take
us
to
create
this
rfp
process.
H
As
you
mentioned,
it
would
potentially
require
us
to
travel
abroad
to
understand
who
the
vendors
are
over
there,
not
even
the
vendors,
but
anyone
who
applies
or
decides
to
submit
for
this
rfp.
I
mean,
in
addition
on
the
practical
to
bid
kind
of
requirements.
H
One
of
the
recognized
kind
of
exemptions
for
this
is,
of
course,
any
type
of
like
foreign,
translation
services,
etc.
Of
course,
these
offices
do
a
lot
more
than
that
right,
but
they
also
provide
us
types
of
services
for
us
on
on
the
business
side.
I
hope
that
at
least
answers
some
of
your
question
senator.
A
Yes,
sir,
any
further
questions
or
follow-ups.
D
A
A
I
Thank
you
co-chair
cook,
just
for
the
other
committee
members,
historical
perspective,
I've
been
on
this
committee
since
2018
and
every
year
we
see
these
contracts
and
this
isn't
a
criticism
you
folks
at
all.
I
understand
the
need
for
them,
but
I
am
curious
as
to
you
know.
Every
year
these
are
multi-million
dollar
contracts
and
local
tenants
are
never
a
inexpensive
proposition
that
so
I'm
just
curious
as
to
what
the
impediments
are
to
hiring
recruiting
hiring
full-time
staff.
So
we
don't
have
to
rely
so
much
on
locums.
I
I
know
this
will
always
be
part
of
what
you
do,
but
is
there
a
plan
in
place
to
try
to
recruit
permanent
staffing,
so
we
don't
have
to
rely
so
much
on
these
because
again,
it's
a
very
expensive
proposition
that
when
we
do
it
so,
but
if
there's
some
significant
impediments
to
recruiting
permanent
people,
I'd
appreciate
knowing
what
that
is
too.
So
I
guess
in
summary,
just
curious
what
the
plan
is.
J
So
currently
we
do
recruit
doctors,
doctors
locally,
all
of
our
physicians
are
contracted,
but
the
majority
of
those
are
contracted
through
the
community
mental
health
centers
that
are
partnered
with
the
psychiatric
hospitals
that
are
in
those
areas.
I
think
right
now
we
have
38
physicians
for
our
state
operative
facilities.
Eight
of
those
are
through
locum
tenant
contracts.
J
28
are
through
the
community
mental
health
centers
that
we
work
with,
and
then
there
are
two
that
are
on
personal
service
contracts,
so
we
we
do
recruit
heavily
and
again,
for
the
most
part
are
able
to
hire
through
those
community
mental
health
centers.
But
we
do
support
with
local
tenants
when
necessary.
J
Staffing
has
been
extremely
challenging
for
the
past
three
years
and
that's
for
all
of
our
facilities
and
really
almost
all
physician
types,
whether
it's
correctional
officers,
nurses,
physicians
and
we
have
had
a
lot
of
longevity.
We
have
some
good
doctors
through
the
community
mental
health
centers
that
have
been
with
our
facilities
for
quite
some
time.
But
there's
been
a
couple
years.
We've
tried
to
recruit
in
and
there's
been
some
challenges.
J
I
J
Yes-
and
we
typically
do
not
use
that
we
try
to
leave
the
contracts
enough
on
that
each
one
of
our
facilities
needed
a
couple
of
the
different
physician
types
that
there
would
be
room
for
that.
But
I
think
last
year
we
spent
around
three
and
a
half
million
in
total
on
all.
I
C
I
guess
this
will
this
will
be
a
day.
I
actually
say
something.
I
just
have
one
quick
question.
I
noticed
that
that
all
the
all
the
the
vendors,
the
agencies
that
we're
using
are
out
of
state
what
are
the
impediments
to
finding
vendors
within
the
state
of
kentucky,
so
we
can
keep
some
of
our
money
in
kentucky.
J
We
we
actually
when
this
these
contracts
were
bid.
I
think
in
2018
and
the
rfp
was
open
for
a
month
and
there
were
21
vendors
notified
and
we
awarded
contracts
to
every
responsive
vendor.
So
had
there
been
responsive
vendors
in
the
commonwealth,
we
would
have
awarded
a
contract
to
them.
A
Senator
douglas,
it
seems
to
be,
I
think
we
see
that
a
lot
where
and
then,
when
we
ask
the
question
it's,
you
know
why
I
know
kentucky
vendors
and
nobody
ever
never
applied
and
never
never
filled
out
the
rfp
process.
So
I
don't
know
what
the
reason
for
that
is
but
seems
to
ongoing
thing
as
well
as
staffing
issues.
That's
not
just
a
health
care
issue.
That's
that's
across
the
board,
from
from
agriculture
to
health
care,
it's
it's
everywhere!
A
K
I
I
do
appreciate
you
joining
us
this
morning
and
when
we
last
looked
at
this
contract,
a
lot
of
concern
and
consternation
about
the
history
of
this
saying
I
won't
for
you
folks,
are
repeating
that,
but
as
a
direct
result
of
that,
we
passed
senate
bill
42
this
last
session
that
tried
to
address
one
of
the
issues
related
to
this
contract
and
this
service.
So
I
guess
my
question
is
in
light
of
the
passage
of
senate
bill
42.
How
does
that
impact
this
contract.
K
In
this
case
that
that
was
not
what
happened
this
lobbyist
was
the
lobbyist
involved
in
this
was
not
convicted
in
any
way.
In
relation
to
the
third
party
administrative
contract
that
we're
talking
about
you.
I
K
So
what
I
was
saying
senator
is
that
we
don't
believe
that
senate
bill
42,
impacts
this
contract
and
that
the
reason
for
that
is
that
we
don't
believe
that
we
that
this
particular
lobbyist
in
question
was
convicted
of
anything
in
relation
to
this
third-party
administrative
contract
for
workers.
Comp.
I
K
A
I
Thank
you
coach
cook
and
thank
you
folks
for
being
available
to
us
this
morning.
You
know,
I
don't
have
any
problem
the
contract
per
se,
but
just
I'm
curious
as
to
where
this
water
district
is
in
light
of
its
past
history.
We
know
it's
had
some
significant
issues.
I
know
we've
made
some
investment
in
to
it.
I
guess
I'm
surprised,
given
the
history
of
this,
that
really
90
000
is
not
a
significant
amount.
L
Okay,
so
this
is
a
continuance
of
an
existing
contract
that
was
probably
started
back
in
2018,
and
this
is
some
remaining
funds
that
they
had
on
the
first
contract
and
it
expired
at
the
end
of
the
year.
L
So,
given
the
fact
that
they've
had,
I
think
some
changes
and
delays
in
grand
administrators
changing
engineers
changing
this
project
had
been
delayed,
but
now
that
they
have
still
have
this
pot
of
money
left,
we
needed
to
go
back
into
a
new
moa
just
so
they
could
have
expenditures
for
this
year
to
which,
of
course,
the
deadline
will
be
december.
30Th
and,
of
course,
the
scope
of
work
is
listed
there
in
the
contract
as
to
what
they
plan
on
finishing
out.
The
remainder
of
the
funds.
L
L
Jeff
would
you
want
to,
since
you
were
the
minister
on
this
project?
Would
you
want
to
make
any
comments
as
to
where
you
think
they
may
be.
D
Good
morning,
basically,
this
helps
with
some
of
their
problems,
but
they
have
a
whole
lot
of
issues
that
are
going
on
down
there
and
you
know
there's
a
whole
lot
of
money,
that's
needed
to
fix
all
of
their
issues,
but
this
definitely
helps
them
fix
a
few.
I
I
It
goes
back
several
several
years
and
I
I
guess,
I'm
just
a
little
bit
perturbed
disturbed
that
we're
making
an
investment
we're
not
moving
this
along
again,
not
putting
you
people
on
the
spot,
not
being
critical
of
you,
but
I
guess
I
want
to
know
what
the
plan
is
to
get
them
where
they
need
to
be
so
that
everybody
in
martin
county
has
access
to
clean
water.
A
L
I
don't
have
knowledge
of
that.
That
actually
goes
through
our
kentucky
infrastructure
authority,
but
we
can
get
that
information
for
you.
A
I
D
A
I
M
M
Yes,
sir,
not
only
just
health
departments,
but
also
facilities
who
have
health
care
providers
that
are
involved
so
we'll
be
able
to
provide
continuing
education
training
for
those
folks
that
are
involved
in
the
front
lines.
This
includes
front
line
infection
prevention,
control
and
quality
measures.
M
Well,
actually,
it's
not
directly
kovitzer.
It's
all
infection
prevention
and
quality
control,
which
happened
to
be
in
existence.
Long
before
covet,
came
about
and
continues
to
exist
after
covet
infection.
Prevention
and
control
are
measures
that
are
necessary
for
all
types
of
infection,
and
we
we've
realized
through
covid
that
we've
perhaps
not
done
as
well
in
infection
prevention
and
control
in
the
last
year
as
we
had
previously,
and
we
need
to
ramp
up
retrain
folks,
the
cnas,
the
folks
that
are
on
the
floor
that
are
working.
M
I
M
I
K
M
This
funding
is
through
multiple
federal
grants
that
are
available
to
us
from
the
epidemiology
and
laboratory
capacity,
enhancing
detection
grant,
and
that
is
a
grant
that
we've
had
for
a
long
time
there's
additional
funding.
Now
that
has
not
been
available
in
the
past
to
get
this
established
and
there
are
requests
to
have
this
train
request
from
the
grantors
to
have
this
training
implemented.
I
M
So
we
have
had
a
long-standing
relationship
with
the
nationally
renowned
infection
preventionist,
dr
ruth
carco,
who
is
at
norton's,
and
so
this
is
an
extension
of
a
long-standing
relationship
we've
had
with
dr
carrico
and
the
staff
for
infection
prevention,
with
the
additional
federal
funding
that
is
currently
available
to
us,
we'll
be
able
to
enhance,
create
webinars
that
we
can
that
we
can
house
for
continuous
use
after
they're
developed,
we'll
be
able
to
do
regional
trainings
where
on
hand,
training
can
be
conducted
in
the
participants
can
receive
continuing
education
credit
at
the
same
time,
through
this
federal
grant,.
M
C
I
Appreciate
just
absolutely
kind
of
see
what
the
historical
trends
are
sure
all
right.
Thank
you.
That's
all
I
have
mr
chair.
A
A
F
Hello,
mr
chairman,
I'm
mike
mange
and
I'm
commissioner
of
the
department
of
tourism
with
me
today
is
our
deputy
commissioning
commissioner
jewitt
and
our
executive
director
of
the
finance
department
for
the
cabinet,
melissa,
brooke.
N
C
L
A
A
I
Yeah,
thank
you
all
for
being
here
this
morning,
and
certainly
the
screening
programs
are
great
and
the
more
funds
we
can
put
into
them.
I
think
the
more
successful
we
can
be
in
addressing
these
horrific
diseases,
I'm
curious
as
to
how
this
is
coordinated
with
our
managed
care
organizations
who
you
know
are
responsible
for
now
over
a
third
of
our
population
in
the
state
so
and
and
they're
supposed
to
be
improving
the
health
of
our
population.
So
I'm
curious
as
to
how
this
interfaces
with
their
efforts.
N
Our
program
was
designed
for
uninsured
only
so
that's
our
population,
it's
a
safety
net
program,
that's
been
in
existence
for
30
years,
and
it
it
targets
those
that
don't
have
any
other
insurance.
So
while
we
conduct
outreach
to
all
women,
we
we
target
the
uninsured.
So
it
does
not
really
interface
with
medicaid
and
managed
care.
When.
N
I
I
N
Both
can,
I
say,
both
yeah.
We
still
continue
to
do
outreach
for
those
folks,
because
we've
learned,
as
you
all
probably
know-
that
even
though
you've
got
a
medicaid
card
doesn't
mean
you've
you're
going
to
go
get
screened.
So
we
certainly
do
outreach
to
all
all
women.
N
That
doesn't
mean
they're
automatically
covered
as
far
as
their
preventive
health.
You
know,
so
you
need
to
to
navigate
them
and
identify
them.
Reach
them.
Pull
them
in
and
get
them
screened
is
our
job.
I
N
We
go
to
the
racetrack,
we
go
to
health
fairs
and
that's
dedicated
to
their
profession
and
try
our
best
to
reach
them.
N
That's
a
wonderful
question:
it's
it's!
A
hundred
percent
funded.
We
have
a
huge.
We
have
an
issue
with
the
undocumented
that
they're
not
eligible
for
medicaid.
I
I
certainly
appreciate
that,
and
you
know
I
try
to
educate
people
that
there's
a
significant
cost
of
doing
nothing
and
that
we
don't
measure
sometimes
and
that's
why
I
have
such
an
interest
in
this,
but
certainly
appreciate
the
work
that
you
all
do
and
to
see
that
kind
of
decline
over
the
years
is
commendable.
So
thank
you
appreciate
the
information
this
morning
and
I
thank
you,
but
michelle
throwing
the
question
I'll
move
any.
E
N
N
G
A
K
D
A
F
A
Welcome
thanks
for
being
on
here
with
us
this
morning,
co-chair
co-chamber.
Meredith
has
a
question.
I
I
do
thank
you
appreciate
you
joining
us
this
morning
and
you
know
obviously
several
contracts
here
when
you
told
them
a
significant
amount
of
dollars,
but
the
description
that
we
have
for
each
region
just
says
multi,
and
I
guess
I'm
curious
is
how
are
these
dollars
expended
and
how
do
you
keep
track
of
of
how
they're
expending
and
what
they're
expended
for.
F
Sure
I
understand
what
the
description
where
the
confusion
would
come
in
this
funding
is
federal
funding
came
from
the
economic
development
administration
under
the
arpa
program,
each
state
tourism
office
was
given
an
allocation
of
money
under
a
formula.
Kentucky
received
five
million
three
hundred
forty
six
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
with
that.
F
F
So
the
process
that
we
put
in
place,
pardon
me
is
that
once
we
officially
received
the
funds
we
put
together
an
application
process,
each
eligible
organization
had
to
send
us
their
plan
how
they
were
going
to
spend
the
money
it
had
to
fall
under
the
similar
guidelines
of
our
existing
matching
funds
program
that
has
been
in
place
for
many
many
years,
so
similar
eligible
costs
under
the
contract.
They
must
report
to
us
back
on
the
roi
on
each
of
the
programs
and
its
effectiveness.
I
F
The
guidelines
did
not
call
for
a
follow-up
audit.
We
do
not
have
plans
for
that
at
this
time.
I
F
F
Have
to
submit
to
us,
for
example,
if
they
run
an
ad,
they
have
to
send
us
a
copy
of
the
ad
a
copy
of
the
invoice
etc.
So
it's
not
just
we're
not
just
taking
their
word
for
it.
They
have
to
show
us
the
documentation
of
what
they
spent
and
how
it
was
spent,
and
then
we
will
compare
that
to
the
application
to
make
sure
it
was
in
compliance.
F
I
can
send
to
you
chairman
the
guidelines
specifically,
but
is
primarily
marketing,
whether
that's
print
tv
digital.
It
can
be
research
as
well
for
the
local
community,
anything
that
helps
them
to
recover
from
a
marketing
perspective
to
pre-pandemic
levels.
I
F
F
Contracts
with
a
company
called
tourism
economics,
what
we
did
is
by
county.
We
took
the
total
economic
impact,
the
sheriff's
the
state
impact
so
for
in
that
example,
jefferson
county,
for
instance,
was
28.5
of
the
total
economic
impact.
Therefore,
they
were
eligible
for
28.5
of
those
funds,
and
we
did
that
for
every
county
in
kentucky.
I
I
F
Well,
keep
in
mind,
mr
chairman,
that
these
funds
again
were
for
recovery
marketing
trying
to
get
back
to
that
level.
I
will
tell
you
that
in
a
couple
of
instances,
I've
had
tourism
directors
come
up
to
me
and
say
that
that
even
smaller
amounts
that
they've
received
is
more
marketing
money
than
they've
ever
had
in
any
single
year.
I.
I
E
Thank
you,
the
5
million
something
that
you're
we're
talking
about
here,
that's
been
divided
up.
Is
that
the
same
formula
as
we're
familiar
with
that's
normally
in
approximately
like
2
million
or
so
with
the
marketing
dollars
that
we
do
to
each
of
the
tourism
groups
of,
or
is
this
no
ma'am.
F
E
F
It's
not
that
formula
was
compiled
by
the
economic
development
administration.
I
do
not
actually
have
a
copy
of
what
that
formula
and
the
allocations
were
for
each
state
office.
There
was
a
total
of
510
million
dollars
available
that
went
to
state
tourism
offices
and
the
5.3
million
is
what
kentucky
received.
I
can
try
to
track
that
down
from
you
before
you
from
the
eda,
if
you'd
like
it,
but
we
have
never
seen
that
final,
that
exact
formula
they
just
told
us
how
much
money
we
had.
F
E
Okay,
well
I'm
trying
to
get
to
the
bottom
of
how
many
total
funds
we're
going
to
see.
Is
this
the
total
all
5.3
million?
This
is
a
one-time
drop.
This
is
the
only
contract
we're
going
to
or
mo
whatever
we're
on
here,
moa
they're
going
to
see
or
they're
going
to
be
more
because
I
know
we
had
the
75
million
that
we
did
in
the
I
thought
it
was
75
could
have
been
something
different
now,
whatever
the
final
budget
number
was
that
we
were
expanding
from
the
arpa
funds
are.
E
F
No
ma'am,
you
are
correct,
it
will
be
coming
through
our
office
and
our
plans
right
now.
We
work
with
finance
cabinet.
Our
plans
right
now
are
to
have
a
similar
type
contract
situation.
All
the
partners
or
recipients
will
have
to
receive.
E
Signed
contract
to
come
through.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
just
want
to
make
note
here
in
historically,
and
we
heard
earlier-
it's
been
the
approximately
two
million
dollars,
I'm
aware
of
that
gets
allocated
to
the
different
local
offices
for
marketing
purposes,
and
now
we
come
to
find
out,
and
earlier
this
year
we
were
hearing
that
they
wanted
us
to
use
arpa
money
which
we
did
for
this
and
we
come
to
find
out.
There's
a
special
federal
fund
through
the
eda.
That's
been
5.3
million.
E
I
don't
remember
that
ever
coming
up
in
the
discussions-
and
you
know
when
you
talk
about
marketing
dollars,
it
does
concern
me
because,
as
I've
mentioned,
you
know
my
local
economic
building
office,
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
money,
there's
a
lot
of
locations
to
put
black
holes
in
marketing
and
it
concerns
me.
You
know
the
level
of
expertise
and
the
type
of
marketing
that
we're
doing
and
the
money
that's
going
into
marketing
right
now,
we're
talking
about
potentially
40
times
the
normal
money.
E
That's
not
just
getting
to
pandemic
levels,
that's
excessive
of
numbers
of
money,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
somehow,
through
these
contracts
or
somehow
the
next
ones
we
just
need
to
have
on
our
radar.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
these
dollars
are
being
spent
and
figure
out
some
kind
of
an
audit
process
on
how
it
went,
because
I
do
think
that's
going
to
be
a
major
concern
as
we
move
forward.
A
A
Items
on
the
agenda
are
three
exemption
requests
to
consider.
I
will,
if
you'll
take
a
quick
moment
to
look
at
numbers,
12,
13
and
14.
glance
those
over
and
then
we
needed
a
motion
to
approve
those
exemption
requests
and
we
can
do
those
one
at
a
time
or
we
can
do
all
three
together.
A
A
Aye
motion
carries
12,
13
and
14
exemption
requests
are
approved
before
adjournment.
Let
me
just
tell
everybody:
the
next
meeting
will
be
tuesday
will
be
tuesday
june
14th
and
the
july
meeting
will
be
thursday,
the
14th,
so
a
little
bit
of
change
so
tuesday
june
14th
for
the
june
meeting
july
meeting
will
be
on
thursday,
the
14th.
With
that
being
said,
we
haven't.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
adjourn.