►
From YouTube: Budget Review Subcommittee on Transportation (8-4-21)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Just
to
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
as
well
shift
provides
a
mechanism
to
inform
priorities
for
various
types
of
projects,
including
safety,
improvements,
road
widening
reconstruction,
new
interchanges
and
new
routes,
but
that
does
not
replace
the
prioritization
processes
that
were
already
in
place
for
other
types
of
projects
such
as
early
municipal
aid,
mpo,
dedicated
projects,
other
federally
dedicated
projects
like
safety,
bike
pad
congestion
or
our
maintenance
projects
or
asset
management,
including
bridges
and
pavements
shift,
looks
at
five
components
to
compare
the
needs
across
the
state.
A
Just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
on
what
each
one
is
looking
at
the
safety
component,
we're
comparing
our
routes
previous
five
years
of
crash
performance
and
characteristics
of
the
roadway,
including
grade
width,
curvature,
things
that
make
the
road
the
road
next
for
asset
management
in
an
interest
of
of
making
sure
our
dollars
just
are
spent
efficiently.
A
We
consider
projects
that
also
have
a
pavement
bridge
or
recurring
maintenance
needs
so
that
we
can.
We
can
kill
as
many
birds
as
we
can
with
a
single
stone.
Next
congestion,
that
aids
in
identification
of
persistent
capacity
needs
on
the
network,
our
benefit
cost.
A
Through
shift,
we
have
two
level
levels
of
evaluation.
First
is
the
statewide
in
which
we
use
a
100
quantitative
evaluation,
and
with
this
we
have
those
five
components:
weight
of
the
scene,
safety,
25,
congestion,
economic
growth
and
benefit
costs
each
at
20
and
asset
management
at
15.
A
After
our
statewide
evaluation,
we
move
to
the
regional,
which
is
very
similar.
The
the
weights
are
slightly
reduced
with
a
maximum
of
safety
of
20
and
there's
two
additional
inputs
numbers
disappear.
I
apologize,
but
two
other
components
are
the
local
input,
where
we
look
at
local
priorities
from
the
kytc
district,
as
well
as
local
priorities
from
the
area,
development,
districts
or
mpos.
A
This
is
a
critical
important
to
get
these
boosts
from
our
local
planners
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
momentarily
now
to
get
into
the
into
the
the
schedule
the
shift
process.
We
began
back
at
the
first
of
the
year
by
identifying
needed
projects
through
our
through
our
local
planners.
A
Next,
we
need
to
narrow
that
list
down
to
a
manageable
number
and
you'll
see
why,
based
on
the
number
that
were
identified
through
the
projects
phase,
next
we
review
and
score
projects
using
the
quantitative
measures.
A
Then
we
take
those
projects
that
are
on
the
national
highway
system
or
our
arterial
network,
and
we
narrow
that
down
to
a
list
of
statewide
priorities,
the
balance
of
those
projects
we
send
out
to
our
regional
planners
to
incorporate
the
boosting
aspect,
which
is
what
we're
starting
today
and
from
there
we'll
combine
the
boosts
and
the
qualitative
or
the
quantitative
and
the
qualitative,
which
is
the
boost
to
help
inform
the
recommended
six-year
highway
plan.
B
A
Of
background
on
each
step,
the
project
cycle,
which
went
through
march
first
of
this
year,
we
identified
almost
four
thousand
projects:
totaling
over
70
billion
dollars.
A
That's
a
lot
of
projects
and
a
lot
of
dollars,
and
so
our
first
step
was
try
to
then
narrow
that
down
to
a
more
reasonable
number.
So
between
that
and
in
may,
we
identified
the
1200
projects,
approximately
1200
projects,
totaling
about
24
billion
dollars,
and
that
is
the
projects
that
we
put
through
the
shift
process
to
to
identify
the
qualitative
scores.
A
Next
step
was
the
state
wide
priorities
which
we
just
completed:
the
number
of
projects
that
were
identified
as
on
the
national
highway
system.
We
had
275
projects,
totaling,
11
billion
dollars,
and
out
of
that,
as
we
have
in
the
last
few
cycles,
we
identified
the
interstates
and
parkways
and
we
set
those
aside
as
as
projects
that
would
incorporate
up
the
statewide
priorities.
A
A
So
that
brings
us
up
to
project
boosting
which
my
colleagues
in
planning
are
going
to
distribute
today
and
that
continues
through
september
24th.
A
This
boost
project
boosting
contributes
30
percent
toward
the
final
score.
A
a
successful
boost
will
not
make
a
bad
project
good,
but
it
will
make
a
fair
project
attractive
at
the
end
of
the
day.
A
So
we
talked
before
about
opportunities
for
legislative
members
to
to
get
involved
in
the
shift
process
and
as
we're
kicking
off
the
project
boosting.
This
is
an
excellent
time
for
for
yourselves,
your
local
officials
or
your
constituents
to
get
involved
and
identify
those
elements
that
may
make
a
project
special
and
we've
been
asked
with.
We've
asked
our
local
planners
to
to
coordinate
and
to
respond
back
with
their
boost
by
september.
24Th.
A
Note
that
that
doesn't
mean
that
some
of
those
meetings
may
be
as
early
as
next
week,
or
it
could
be
some
at
the
end
of
this
week.
So
we
encourage
everyone
to
reach
out
to
the
local
planning
organizations
to
identify
when
those
meetings
will
be
and
how
you
can
get
involved
with
that
process.
A
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
john.
We
do
have
a
question
senator
webb.
D
Thank
you,
john,
and
you
know
we
appreciate
the
shift
diagram
and
its
application
most
of
the
time.
I
do
feel.
However,
some
local
planning
organizations
are
a
little
more
amenable
to
our
input
in
some
districts.
More
than
others
I
mean
we
are
the
appropriators
revenue.
We
are
charged
with
the
distribution
of
tax
money
and
I
feel
very
responsible
for
projects
in
my
district
and
that
impact
my
district
and
as
well
as
the
rest
of
the
commonwealth.
D
So
I
I
just
always
feel
compelled
to
remind
transportation
cabinet
of
that
and
the
local
planning
entities
like
I
said.
I've
got
some
great
ones,
but
it
it's
not
real,
consistent
throughout
the
commonwealth
and
how
we
are
included
or
accommodated
either
by
schedule
as
things
we're
here,
I'm
down
here
quite
a
bit,
I'm
120
miles
away.
D
So
you
know
I
would
go
one
step
further
and
say
that
the
local
planning
organizations
and
the
department
should
be
more
communicative
and
accommodating
to
our
schedules,
as
the
appropriator
of
funds
and
revenue
in
the
bienniums
to
allow
us
to
be
an
integral
part
of
the
decision-making,
because
we're
going
to
be
the
ultimate
decision
maker
in
in
a
way
here
in
the
budget
cycle.
D
So
I
I
just
think
especially
for
the
newer
members
that
those
planning
organizations
and
department
can
can
be
a
little
more
accommodating
to
our
schedules
and
a
little
more
receptive
to
our
input,
because
nobody
knows
our
districts
and
our
needs
like
we
do.
But
thank
you,
mr
chairman,.
C
Thank
you.
You
have
any
comments,
john
on
her
any
remarks.
A
C
Thank
you,
I'm
just
going
to
comment,
I'm
a
transportation
nut
and
I'm
constantly
calling
our
county
judges,
our
planning
organizations.
I
mean
I
do
it
myself
and
I
do
get
involved
in
just
like
everyone
else.
Your
time
is
valuable.
So
if
you
want
to
get
involved,
make
the
phone
calls.
That's
what
I
always
do.
E
Hi,
thank
you
for
your
time.
Today.
I
have
a
question
on
on
shift
scoring
as
it
pertains
to
new
projects.
So
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
the
shift
scoring
may
disadvantage
new
projects
specifically
like
around
safety?
You
know,
like
the
prevalence
of
accidents
on
a
on
a
non-existing
project,
is
going
to
be
zero
right,
but
as
soon
as
we
put
a
road
in
place,
then
we're
gonna
obviously
have
some
accidents
associated.
So
it's
it's.
A
It
does
have
benefit
because
we
in
lieu
of
ignoring
it,
since
there
is
no
crash
history
on
that
route,
we
identify
a
an
impacted
route
that
will
that
the
new
project
will
draw
traffic
from
and
we
use
the
crash
history,
as
well
as
the
various
criteria
about
that
route.
To
help
inform
the
shift
score.
A
There
are
aspects
that
that
that
do
not
get
get
benefit.
I
don't
believe
it
has
a
safety
benefit,
because
it's
uncertain
as
to
what
the
crash
reduction
would
be
of
that
new
route,
and
nor
does
it
have
asset
management
benefit,
because
it's
not
taking
any
it's,
not
improving
any
existing
payments
or
any
existing
bridges
through
the.
A
As
you
indicate
the
through
the
boost
process,
that's
an
excellent
time
to
provide
the
local
local
importance
of
a
project
and
that's
through
coordination
with
the
local
planners,
as
well
as
the
district
office
to
ensure
that
it
through,
as
we
call
a
double
boosting
it
indicates,
support
from
both
the
district
as
well
as
the
local
planning
level.
So
it's
it's
definitely
something
that
can
be
overcome,
but
it
it
is
an
aspect
of
the
shift
process
that
certain
criteria,
certain
components,
are.
C
Very
good
I,
like
you,
commented
early
safety
is
our
number
one
and
if
it's
a
safety
project
I
know
in
the
past,
we've
always
more
or
less
moved
that
ahead
or
pushed
it
forward.
Because
that's
what
we're
really
concerned
with
next
is
senator
turner.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I've
been
delegated
the
request
by
some
other
senators
representatives
to
make
it
known
the
department
of
transportation
that
the
mountain
parkway,
the
question
of
it
going
on
through
at
the
johnson,
basically
floyd
lining
there,
the
the
senators
turner,
wheeler
and
smith,
the
representative
lafferty
hat
and
mccool
and
blanton,
which
are
all
the
representatives
and
senators
in
question.
That
area
are
wanting
the
department
to
push
through
with
that
on
to
floyd
county
through
the
mountain.
We're
all
supportive
of
that.
B
There's
a
position
that
mr
one
of
the
other
gentlemen,
has
mr
blanton,
but
we
take
that
up
as
a
separate
issue,
but
we
just
want
the
department
to
know
that
there
was
some
concern
and
some
of
them
brought
it
to
my
attention.
So
please
pass
that
on
to
everybody
in
the
department
to
get
that
thing
up
and
running
with
this
consistency
of
this
group.
Thank
you
very
much,
sir.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
C
Thank
you.
If
there's
no
other
comments,
questions
john.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Next,
the
road
fund
revenue
robin
brewer
you're
ready
to
go
there.
You
are
thank
you.
F
Okay,
okay,
so
you
know,
as
the
committee
is
well
aware,
you
all
have
had
to
come
back
the
last
two
legislative
sessions
and
and
build
one-year
budgets
instead
of
a
biennial
budget,
as
we've
typically
done
in
the
past.
All
due
to
you
know
the
uncertainty
of
coba
19.,
and
because
of
that,
the
consensus
forecasting
group
or
the
cfg
has
also
come
in.
You
know
multiple
times
outside
of
their
normal
schedule,
just
to
prepare
revenue,
estimates
for
the
legislative
sessions
and
those
one-year
budgets
so.
B
F
C
Robin
excuse
me:
we
just
have
the
original
page
on
the
screen,
nothing's
pages
on
turning.
F
Is
it
on?
Is
it
showing
being
acted
in
the
actual.
F
So
so,
as
I
was
saying,
cfg
revised
their
estimate
to
the
one
billion
five
hundred.
Seventy
seven
million
seven
hundred
thousand
so
where
we
ended
up
for
the
fiscal
year,
was
actually
one
billion
six
hundred
forty
two
million
three
hundred
thousand.
So
that's
an
increase
of
10.1
percent
from
the
prior
fiscal
year.
F
F
F
Much
of
the
fourth
quarter
increase
was
the
result
of
depressed
collections
in
2020
as
the
pandemic
severely
limited
economic
activity,
growth
rates
for
the
four
quarters
were
1.9
percent
0.7
negative
0.4
and
43.8
road
fund
receipts
had
a
record-breaking
fourth
quarter.
With
total
collections
of
466
points
million
dollars.
F
F
G
F
F
F
F
F
The
official
enacted
road
fund
revenue
estimate
for
2022
is
one
billion,
six
hundred
nine
million
two
hundred
thousand,
for
which
the
budget
was
enacted.
In
april,
the
motor
field
tax
rate
has
been
set
again
at
the
statutory
floor
for
all
of
flight
2022,
according
to
the
quarterly
economic
and
revenue
report
for
the
fourth
quarter
of
fy
2021
from
the
office
of
the
state
budget.
Director
road
fund
revenues
are
forecasted
to
return
to
a
more
normal
growth
pattern.
F
Motor
vehicle
usage
taxes
are
forecasted
to
increase
2.8
percent
over
the
first
three
quarters
of
fy
2022,
while
collections
in
this
account
were
extremely
strong
in
2021,
and
expectations
are
that
automobile
sales
will
cool
off
receipts
in
this
account
are
still
anticipated
to
increase
through
the
first
three
quarters
of
the
year
motor
vehicle.
License
fees
are
expected
to
increase
1.3
weight.
Distance
taxes
are
expected
to
grow.
7.6
motor
vehicle
operators
licenses
are
forecasted
to
rise,
11.1.
F
F
And
so
this
is
a
slide
that
I
believe
you
all
have
seen
before.
I've
shown
this
before
in
other
committee
meetings,
it's
just
a
historical
view
of
total
road
funds
by
fiscal
year.
F
It
goes
from
2011
to
2021
and
it
just
really
kind
of
shows
a
lot
of
what
we've
talked
about
over
the
years.
You
know,
we've
talked
about
the
reference
to
fy14.
A
F
Was
before
we
started
to
have
a
gas
tax
decline
that
actually
occurred
in
the
last
quarter
of
fy15,
but
we
really
didn't
feel
the
impact
of
that
until
I
16.
you
can
see
that
in
the
in
the
numbers
there
you
know,
we've
talked
about
an
f119,
it
took
us
five
years,
but
we
finally
got
back
up
to
our
fy
14
revenue
levels
and.
F
You
know
again,
you
can
see
that
for
2020
and
then
our
most
recent
year
of
2021
being
a
very
strong
year-
and
you
know
again,
as
I
mentioned
earlier-
we're
we
still
are
at
the
status
24
for
the
gas
tax.
F
This
will
be
the
seventh
full
physical
year,
where
we've
been
at
the
saturday
for,
and
so
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
increases
that
we've
experienced
since
the
gas
tax
defined
has
really
been
in
our
motor
vehicle
usage
tax
revenue.
If
it
had
not
been
for
that,
you
know
it
would
be
very
different
situation
of
this
64.6
million
dollar
surplus.
52.3
million
of
that
was
the
usage
stack
and
it
has
just
been
beyond
unprecedented
levels
and
and
we're
very
appreciative
of
that.
F
Obviously,
but
we
you
know,
we
know
that's
not
a
long
term
growth
that
we
can
count
on
for
for
any
long,
long
period
of
time.
So
again
I
just
you
know
like
to
to
point
that
out
to
folks-
and
that
really
concludes
my
presentation.
C
They're
just
so
overwhelmed
with
these
great
numbers
that
we're
not
having
enough
support,
I'm
just
gonna.
I
just
want
to
say
one
brief
comment.
You
know
everyone
in
the
news
now
is
talking
about
some
infrastructure
funding
that
we
could
possibly
get.
Sorry
representative
hayward
has
a
comment.
G
Thank
you
robin
for
the
presentation,
even
though
the
numbers
are
looking
good,
I
still
feel
that
you
know
there's
still
a
lot
of
talk
for
a
usage
tax.
Is
that
something
you
know?
I
think
that
a
lot
of
us
looked
for
the
administration
to
come
out
with
last
session.
G
F
Well,
I
think
our
our
stance
has
always
been
we're
supportive
of
whatever
the
need
is
out
there
I
mean
we
we've
always
said
we'll
do
with
whatever
we
have
we'll
do
the
best
we
can
with
whatever
we
have,
but
you
know
I
mean
the
gas
tax
again
has
been
flat
for
seven
years,
and
construction
prices
are
going
up,
everything
is
costing
more,
so
it's
becoming
increasingly
more
difficult.
You
know
to
meet
those
demands.
G
I
appreciate
that
robin
and
that's
probably
more
of
a
question
for
secretary
gray
or
the
governor,
but
I
think
just
kind
of
to
make
a
comment
to
be
on
the
record
in
here.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
all
work
together
and
all
sides
come
together
to
have
this
conversation
and
to
move
forward
rather
than
putting
on
one
person
or
one
body
to
make
the
decision.
G
As
we
see
construction
rates-
and
you
know
everything
is
skyrocketing
right
now
and
until
we're
actually
going
to
be
serious
about
having
this
conversation,
you
know
it's
great
for
us
to
see
numbers,
but
you
know
I
think
it's
a
joint
conversation.
We
all
need
to
have
that's
not
necessarily
for
you
robin.
That's
just
more
of
a
comment.
So
thank
you
so
much.
C
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
the
comment
representative,
mcpherson.
H
C
Thank
you.
I
was
starting
to
comment
earlier
about
what
congress
congress
is
doing
with
an
infrastructure
package,
and
you
know
whatever
you
hear
it's
money
coming
from
dc,
but
we
will
probably
have
to
do
a
match
and
it
could
be
up
to
20
match.
So
the
legislative
body
is
the
one
hess
in
that
appropriation.
So
we
don't
want
that
money
to
go
to
montana
wyoming
and
california.
We
need
it
in
kentucky.
So
that's
just
my
comment
on
that.