►
Description
Administrative Policies Committee meeting from September 8, 2022. For full agenda details visit https://bit.ly/3RP39Rr
A
B
A
A
Counselor
Dougherty
councilor
osterhoff,
all
in
favor,
asked
unanimously
disclosure
of
pecuniary
Interest,
saying
none
will
move
along
delegations
I
see
none
briefings,
I
see
none
business,
the
redo,
Crest
home
Board
of
management.
There's
a
motion
he'll
need
a
first
and
mover
and
a
secondary
that
the
administrative
policies
committee
resolve
itself
into
the
board
of
management
for
riddle.
Crest
homes
moved
by
councilor
Baum
seconded
by
councilor
Aaron
Doherty.
We
are
now
resolved
into
the
board
of
directors
of
the
board
of
management.
C
C
C
The
second
was
on
our
third
floor,
which
was
declared
July
29th
and
was
active
4
22
days.
We
currently
are
coveted
free
at
the
home.
At
this
point,
the
Ministry
of
Health
wasn't
the
home
to
investigate
three
complaints
and
three
critical
incidents.
During
this
reporting
period,
inspection
protocols
related
to
Falls
prevention,
management
and
infection
prevention
and
control
were
used
during
this
inspection,
and
there
were
no
findings
of
non-compliance.
C
As
of
August
15th,
there
were
488
people
on
the
waitlist
for
Rita
Crest
home.
The
covid-19
pandemic,
as
we
know,
is
still
very
active
and
present
in
Ontario,
Canada
and
globally,
with
the
Rising
case
counts.
Over
the
last
several
months,
we
are
seeing
increased
hospitalizations
in
the
community
as
well
as
outbreaks
within
Long-Term
Care
Homes.
Again,
as
of
the
week
of
August
8th,
there
was
191
of
the
626
homes
in
Ontario
in
an
active
outbreak
with
just
under
1500
active
resident
cases
and
close
to
700
staff
cases.
C
Restrictions
have
been
updated
in
the
last
few
weeks
regarding
staff
working
who
have
had
contact
with
a
positive
case
as
well.
We
have
been
informed
that
the
release
of
the
new
vaccine,
which
is
specific
to
the
Omicron
variant,
is
expected
to
be
released
to
long-term
care
homes
in
the
coming
weeks.
We
are
also
awaiting
the
release
of
the
influenza
vaccine,
which
we
are
expecting
to
provide
to
our
residents
by
the
end
of
September.
C
The
approved
2020
operational
budget
for
Rita
Crest
home
is
just
over
6
million
dollars
in
Municipal
contribution.
As
of
the
end
of
July,
Rita
Crest
has
spent
52
percent
of
that
excluding
commitments
which
puts
us
584
thousand
dollars
under
budget.
A
majority
of
this
underspend
is
related
to
a
surplus
in
funding
related
to
the
pandemic,
as
well
as
staff
vacancies.
D
C
Thank
you
and
through
you,
unfortunately,
when
it
comes
to
our
resident
surveys,
we
don't
have
a
large
amount
of
respondents
able
to
to
provide
the
survey,
but
we
do
have
a
good
number
of
families
and
covet
has
definitely
been
the
top,
especially
for
the
last
two
years
on
the
satisfaction
survey.
It's
it's
the
number
one
thing
we're
dealing
with.
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
ask
for
a
motion
to
that.
The
administrative
policies
committee
arise
from
the
board
of
management
of
orbital
crest,
councilor
Doherty
councilor
bone
all
in
favor
past.
We
are
now
back
to
being
counselors
moving
on
to
business,
Item
B
public
notice
policy
amendments.
E
Always
are
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chair,
we're
here
to
provide
some
information
with
respect
to
the
public
notice
policy.
The
public
North
policy
requires
that
all
municipalities
adopt
and
maintain
a
policy
with
respect
to
the
circumstances
in
which
the
municipality
shall
give
notice
city
of
Kingston's
public
notice
policy
was
last
reviewed
in
2018
and
is
required
to
be
reviewed
at
least
once
every
four
years.
In
reviewing
the
public
notice
policy
staff
reviewed
a
number
of
policies
from
10
Ontario
municipalities
to
determine
the
best
practice.
E
It
is
also
important
to
note
that
the
2017
Council
approved
City's
engagement
framework
outlines
a
clear,
fair
and
Collective
engagement
process
between
residents
and
the
City.
The
public
notice
policy
Works
in
partnership
with
public
engagement
framework.
The
public
notice
policy
sets
out
the
minimum
requirements
for
notice,
but
does
not
prevent
staff
from
public
notice
above
and
beyond
those
requirements.
This
has
become
frequent
practice
since
the
approval
of
the
public
engagement
framework.
A
number
of
amendments
that
are
policies
include
deleting
several
items
from
the
existing
policy
that
do
not
meet
the
definition
of
public
notice.
E
In
many
cases,
the
items
contained
notice,
Provisions
for
specific
persons
and
did
not
have
any
noise
requirements
at
all.
Document
has
also
been
reformatted
to
meet
accessibility
guidelines.
We
have
added
references
where
appropriate
in
the
public
engagement
framework.
That
notice
is
provided
under
the
policy
will
be
consistent
with
the
principles
of
the
framework.
We've
also
added
the
role
of
the
city
clerk
and
the
ability
to
update
the
policy
to
reflect
changes
to
provincial
legislation.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
A
A
F
Thank
you
through
you
Mr
chair,
so
there
is
an
information
report
in
front
of
you
tonight,
which
is
a
follow-up
from
the
report
that
we
brought
believe
it
or
not.
Two
years
ago,
in
September
of
2020.,
a
few
things
related
to
the
pandemic,
that
put
some
things
on
hold,
in
particular
some
of
the
public
engagement
pieces
on
this.
F
So
but
we
are
back
tonight,
the
committee
will
recall
that
the
motion
to
approve
a
revised
or
an
updated
procurement
bylaw
was
deferred
and
a
number
of
things
that
staff
were
asked
to
look
at
and
to
bring
back
more
information
to
the
committee,
which
is
what
we're
doing
tonight.
So
you
will
see
within
the
report
detail
on
the
public
engagement
piece.
We
did
do
a
survey
we
had
about
I.
Think
90
people
participate
in
the
survey,
which
was
great
the
majority
who
were
not
vendors
of
the
city.
F
So
that
was
an
interesting,
interesting
point
as
well.
We
also
had
some
targeted
meetings
with
Kingston
construction
Association
and
the
Kingston
chamber
of
bombers
Brent
funnel
who's
to
my
right
here.
Who's,
our
new
manager
and
I
should
have
introduced
him.
Our
new
manager
of
procurement,
he
and
I,
went
and
and
met
with
both
those
groups
and
got
some
some
targeted
feedback
from
them
as
well
and
I.
Think
I
can
say
certainly
from
from
those
two
meetings.
The
meetings
talked
more,
maybe
even
not
necessarily
bylaw,
but
even
getting
into
some
of
the
process.
F
Day-To-Day
process
type
things
that
they
had
some
concerns
with.
So
I
think
it
was
valuable
in
terms
of
some
of
that
discussion
and
both
groups
have
agreed
to
to
additional
meetings,
as
we
start
to
roll
out
some
of
the
more
process
related
type
items
in
that
regard.
The
other
thing
that
you'll
see
near
the
end
of
the
report
that
I
just
wanted
to
point
out.
F
There
was
a
request
that
we
bring
back
some
more
information
around
councils
role
in
terms
of
discharging
its
responsibility
as
stewards
of
the
public
purse,
and
so
we
do
have
a
section
after
all,
of
the
public
engagement
piece.
That
does
talk
a
bit
about
the
responsibilities
of
council
and
the
responsibility
abilities
of
Staff
within
the
procurement
process,
and
so
just
a
couple
things
that
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on.
F
This
is
the
way
you
would
like
us
to
carry
out
procurement
processes
and
that's
the
bylaw.
That's
in
front
of
you.
Staff
then
have
a
responsibility
to
take
those
rules
and
create
processes
and
what
we're
going
to
be
calling
protocols
that
will
support
those
rules
and
that's
the
on
the
ground,
how
we
Implement
and
carry
out
that
bylaw
and
carry
out
those
rules,
and
so
there
needs
to
be
a
a
definition
with
respect
to
the
responsibilities
between
Administration
and
and
the
political
functions
in
that
regard.
F
F
So
what
the
criteria
is,
what
the
scoring
is,
and
so
that
all
has
to
be
laid
out
so
that
the
market
can
look
at
that
decide
if
they
want
to
propose-
and
they
know
exactly
how
they're
going
to
be
evaluated
as
part
of
that
process.
So
it's
important,
then,
that
we
follow
that
process
right
through
to
the
end
and
an
award
comes
out
based
on
the
highest
highest
scoring
proponent
within
that
process.
F
So
the
one
thing
that
we
never
want
to
do
is
put
put
counsel
then
in
a
position
where
we're
then
bringing
something
forward
to
council
and
saying:
do
you
want
to
approve
this
when
we've
already
followed
the
proper
process?
So
we
don't
want
Council
to
be
in
a
position
where
they
said
we
don't
like
vendor
a
we
like
vendor,
Bay,
vendor
B,
then
the
Integrity
of
that
process
and
the
Integrity
of
what's
required
under
the
bylaw,
is
then
put
in
question
by
the
market.
F
In
some
cases
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
the
case
and
and
assuming
if
I
was
in
your
shoes,
you
would
want
to
know
that
too,
that
we
are
following
the
rules
and
that
things
are
working,
and
so
that's
where
the
council
reporting
comes
into
play.
So
we
are
recommending
continuing
the
monthly
report
that
comes
to
council
with
delegated
authority.
That
report
will
be
the
new
threshold
of
a
hundred
thousand
rather
than
50,
and
that
just
aligns
with
the
hundred
thousand
threshold.
F
F
If
you're
between
the
actually
I
think
it's
15
and
100,
you
still
have
to
get
the
three
quotes,
so
there's
still
a
robust
process
around
fairness
and
transparency,
but
it's
not
an
open
market
process
until
we
get
to
a
hundred
thousand,
and
some
of
that
is
just
evaluating
the
risk.
The
risk
of
our
reputation
risk
Financial
Risk,
with
with
something
that's
between
50
and
100..
F
So
once
you
hit
a
hundred,
we
felt
that
not
only
do
you
need
an
open
competition,
you
need
something
that's
more
robust,
so
we've
changed
the
reporting
back
to
council
to
a
hundred
thousand,
but
we
also
are
going
to
be
increasing
that
reporting,
because
there
is
some
things
that
today
come
to
counsel.
For
instance,
if
we
don't
get
three
quotes
under
our
current
bylaw,
we
have
to
come
to
council
for
approval.
So
if
we
get
two
quotes,
we
do
the
whole
evaluation
process
that
stays
the
same.
The
highest
score
wins.
F
We
then
bring
that
to
council
so
between
50
and
100.
Right
now,
we
are
actually
having
counsel
have
to
actually
agree
to
that
which
is
probably
not
what
we
should
be
doing
so
we're
taking
that
away.
But
we're
also
saying
then,
some
of
that
oversight
needs
to
go
to
our
procurement
Division
and
to
Mr
funnel
and
his
team
to
make
sure
that
those
rules
are
being
followed,
but
because
we
follow
those
criteria.
Even
though
there's
only
two,
then
the
the
award
has
to
be
based
on
what
that
criteria
is.
F
So
we
would
not
be
bringing
that
to
council,
but
we
would
have
a
section
in
the
report
that
showed
those
we'd
also
have
a
section
that
would
show
where
we've
done
sole
source
so
rather
than
coming
to
council.
It
would
still
come
to
council
after
the
fact
is
sole
source.
So
as
Council
you'll
be
able
to
look
and
say,
wow,
there's
a
whole
lot
of
sole
source.
Are
we
doing
this
right?
F
Do
we
need
to
revisit
the
rules,
and-
and
so
it
gives
that
opportunity
then
to
have
that
discussion
overall,
because
you
will
see
that
reporting
on
a
monthly
basis,
so
I
think
that's
probably
the
more
important
piece
in
terms
of
oversight
for
Council
in
terms
of
what
their
role
is
over
and,
above
obviously,
approving
the
rules
that
are
within
the
bylaw.
So
I
will
stop
at
that
Mr,
chair
and
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank.
D
Thank
you
and
through
you,
Mr
chair
thanks
for
that
explanation
and
the
reports
that
were
offered
a
lot
of
detail.
That
was
helpful,
but
I
do
have
a
couple
questions
so
on
on
my
screen.
It's
the
the
pages,
don't
match
the
report
pages,
but
on
page
39
on
the
screen
it
speaks
to
some
of
the
feedback
from
Members
included
that
there
were
some
challenges
about
proof
of
certification
and
certain
requests
for
proposals.
I
wonder
if
we
could
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
more
because
it
seems
to
me
that
that's
an
important
request.
G
Thank
you,
a
three-year
chair.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
When
it
comes
to
the
certifications,
it
was
brought
up
that
in
some
procurements
there
are
what
was
deemed
to
be
unnecessary,
certifications
that
were
involved.
So
we
took
that
note
and
we
have
continued
from
that
point
on
to
scrutinize
rfps
that
are
created
and
we're
going
to
the
subject
matter,
experts
to
ask
them
if
those
certifications
are
actually
required.
D
G
Sorry,
yes,
actually,
absolutely
it
is
to
scrutinize
it
to
another
level,
just
to
ensure
that
it
is
properly
needed,
because
we
don't
want
to
be
asking
for
certifications
that
limit
those
who
would
be
bidding,
because,
therefore
we
would
be
receiving
less
bids
on
our
on
our
projects.
If
it's
not
needed.
Excellent.
D
Thanks
and
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
that
you're
incorporating
environmental
procedure
like
some
processes
for
for
that
and
I
wonder
for
the
staff
and
what
kind
of
education
will
be.
Will
that
include,
and
also
not
just
the
education.
But
how
do
you
assess
what
kind
of
point
system,
and
what
kind
of
when
to
include
that
and
when
you're
not
going
to
who's
going
to
make
that
decision.
F
Thank
you
and
through
you,
Mr
chair,
that's
a
great
question
because
you
write
the
the
bylaw
does
include
the
principles
that
allow
us
to
include
environmental
type
evaluation
criteria,
as
well
as
what
we're
calling
social
procurement.
So
some
of
the
EDI
living
wage
is
something
that
that
we've
had
some
conversation
in
the
past
about
and
how
you
evaluate
that.
So,
yes,
there
will
be
training.
Actually
what
we
will
be
doing
is
is
once
we
get
approval
for
this
bylaw.
F
We
will
be
developing
a
social
procurement
policy
that
will
kind
of
be
that
next
level
down
from
the
bylaw.
That
will
support
the
bylaw
in
terms
of
what
that
will
look
like.
So
it
will
have
some
some
guidelines
around
the
types
of
things,
the
types
of
evaluations
and
that
we
could
do
and
that
policy
will
then
get
rolled
out
to
staff
to
be
trained.
The
other
piece
of
it
in
in
those
rfps.
Is
they
all
go
through
Mr
funnel's
group?
F
G
Thanks
so
when
we,
when
we're
talking
about
environmental
considerations,
it
could
very
well
be
when
we're
when
we're
purchasing
Fleet
assets,
talking
about
the
particular
carbon
footprint
via
the
electric
piece,
the
total
cost
of
ownership.
So
it's
not
necessarily
when
you
buy
a
piece
of
equipment
and
you
know
for
its
life
cycle.
It
includes
the
end
of
life
as
well.
How
is
that
disposed
in
the
most
environmental
way
possible?
So
there
are
Avenues
to
go
down
and
it
will
be
a
learning
curve.
D
D
Cut
off
there
that
that
impacts,
the
environment
when
things
have
to
travel
very
far,
and
the
survey
clearly
showed
a
lot
of
people
were,
are
interested
in
us
procuring
more
local
and
I.
Just
wonder
this
is
kind
of
a
legal
question.
Actually,
if
we
have
in
our
procurement
process
that
we
want
the
products
to
travel,
come
from
a
closer
distance
because
of
the
environmental
impact
of
being
shipped
from
so
far
away.
F
So
thank
you
to
you,
Mr
chair.
So
that's
a
great
question
and
you're
correct
the
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
came
back
in
our
open-ended
question
that
we
had
in
the
survey.
I
would
say.
Probably
at
least
a
quarter
of
them
were
about
local
preference,
and
you
cannot
give
advantage
to
local
businesses
in
terms
of
permit
I.
Think
it's
under
the
discriminatory
business
practices
act
that
you
can
but
I'm
not
going
to
go
any
farther
than
that,
because
we
actually
do
have
Andrew
reason
with
us.
D
Thank
you.
It
might
be
something
we
look
at
when
we
try
to
count
our
emission
numbers,
and
that
might
be
then
a
reason
for
us
to
consider
that
so
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
and
I.
Just
my
last
question
is
just
a
really
quick
one.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
answer.
Also,
the
legal
answer
there.
The
non-standard
procurements
they're
obviously
still
need
to
be
items
in
the
budget
and
is
that
correct.
F
Yesterday,
Mr
chair,
absolutely
they
still
have
to
be.
Non-Statter
means
not
just
not
following
our
standard
process
of
you're
between
15
and
100
000,
you
have
to
get
three
quotes
over
100.
You
have
to
go
to
market,
so
emergency
procurement
is
a
great
example
of
that
it
may
be
over
a
hundred
thousand,
but
we
don't
have
time
to
do
a
full
open
competition.
So
that's
the
non-standard
piece,
but
yes
would
absolutely
have
to
do.
F
Budget
I
shall
clarify
that
we
do
have
had
a
couple
of
situations,
I
think
in
the
15
years,
I've
been
here
where
we
didn't
have
budget
for
an
emergency
and
we
kind
of
had
to
borrow
from
another
budget
because
it
was
an
emergency
situation.
But
but
in
most
cases
there
would
have
to
be
budget
before
we
can
do
any
kind
of
a
procurement
thanks.
I
I
So,
which
is
good,
I
mean
the
one
paragraph
which
is
makes
sense
to
me
on
page
40.
It
goes.
It
is
important
to
note
that,
in
accordance
with
Municipal
best
practice
and
trade
treaty
legislation,
there
is
a
need
for
Clear
separation
of
political
and
administrative
functions
with
respect
to
procurement
operations,
to
avoid
the
potential
appearance
of
bias
or
political
influence
and
procurement
award
decisions,
it
is
best
practiced
that
members
of
council
are
not
involved
in
the
competitive
procurement
processes.
I
Contract
Awards
need
to
be
based
on
the
objective
application
of
the
operational
processes
and
transparent
I,
totally
get
that
I
mean
I,
can't
imagine
in
all
my
years
so
far,
I've
never
really
thought
a
counselor
would
be,
but
it's
written
in
there.
The
question
I
have
is
related
to
that
kind
of.
How
do
we,
like
I,
do
have
a
situation,
that's
sort
of
never
quite
gotten
away
with
with
a
contractor
that
it
doesn't
feel
that
they've
been
given
a
fair
opportunity
and
what
are
the
checks
and
balances
within
the
city
structure?
I
G
Through
you
chair,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
question
there.
There
is
definitely
a
there
is
definitely
a
protest
section
with
within
our
within
our
bylaw
that
like
right
now,
it's
it's
section
22.4,
which
has
our
like
the
the
proposed
bylaw,
which
does
have
the
means
for
those
who
would
like
to
challenge
the
process.
G
If
that's
what
you
are
referring
to,
that
someone
may
have
seen
a
solicitation
but
did
not
agree
with
the
process
that
that
was
taken
or
did
not
agree
with
the
results
of
of
such
process.
There
is
also
a
debriefing
process
as
well
for
anyone
who
does
bid
on
our
projects.
That
is
clearly
stated
in
our
RFP
document.
That
does
allow
a
vendor
to
ask
questions
and
gain
a
bit
more
knowledge
on.
Maybe
why
they
weren't
successful
and
that's
definite
feedback
that
we're
very
much
promoting
these
days.
G
For
those
who
aren't
successful,
because
we
want
everyone
to
succeed
to
the
best
of
their
potential.
So
we
would
like
to
let
them
know
where
there
were
areas
where
they
may
not
have
scored
all
that
well
to
give
them
constructive
feedback.
I'll
call
it
to
sort
of
allow
them
to
to
to
to
possibly
do
better
on
the
next
procurement.
I
G
Through
you
again
chair,
yes,
it
would
be
procurement,
it's
not
specifically
stated
in
there,
but
there
is
that's
something
definitely
to
think
about,
but
in
most
cases,
if
there's
any
other
challenges,
we
do
have
my
informations
on
the
city's
site
and
most
most
citizens
would
definitely
go
there.
I
receive
calls
almost
daily
on
on
various
concerns
and
various
comments,
so
that
is
something
that
that
it
would
definitely
come
come
to
me
or
it
may
actually
come
to
the
RFP
contact
if
it
was
to
do
with
a
specific
RFP.
G
I
Okay,
and
so
it
is
pretty
clear,
though,
in
this
document-
thank
you
for
that
Andrea.
That's
helpful.
I
made
notes
there
in
this
document.
Can
you
point
out
that,
as
well
as
considering
the
counselors
of
political
bias,
not
you
know
Finding
making
sure?
Is
it
also
written
that
that's
also
like
staff?
It
can't
be
from
within
a
bias
has
to
be
looked
at
from
other
directions
as
well.
G
Yeah
I'm
just
I'm
through
you
again
sure
I'm
just
getting
down
to
the
section
myself.
My
screen
just
blocked
out
I'm
just
trying
to
refer
to
the
section
yeah.
So
so,
basically
it
right
now
it
doesn't
necessarily
State
who,
but
it
it
is
very
much
with
within
our
staff.
It
is
very
much
known
that
it
could
very
well
be
vendors.
G
It
could
very
well
be
internal
staff
as
well
that
we
need
to
ensure
that
the
ensure
that
the
proper
channels
are
being
met
and
that
the
the
bias
is
taken
out
and
we
we
sort
of
the
purchasing
or
the
procurement
department,
is
that
middle
ground
we're
the
ones
that
sort
of
dictate
and
sort
of
steer
the
ship
per
se
in
terms
of
what
is
ethical
and
what
is
reasonable
and
what
isn't
reasonable.
Exactly.
I
I
It
is
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
it
should
be
so
I
mean
that's
a
question
for
Council
to
consider
is:
is
there
is
there
guidelines
you
know,
or
is
there
a
whistleblower
kind
of
thing
you
know
do
we
have
you
know
where
something
isn't
fair?
You
know
and
you
see
it
or
is
there
a
protocol
to
ensure
you
know,
there's
no,
you
know
systemic
unfairness
within
within
procurement.
I,
don't
think
there
is,
but
I
just
wondered
if
because
they
mentioned
it
for
counselors,
should
we
also
mention
it
for
for
staff.
F
Thank
you
through
Mr,
chair
I
can
just
maybe
add
to
that.
There
is
a
couple
of
sections
I
believe
at
section
starts
at
Section
8,
which
is
the
roles
and
responsibilities
of
officers
and
employees,
and
so
it
does
talk
a
little
bit
in
there
about
staff
having
to
follow
the
procurement,
bylaw
and
so
I.
F
Think
inherent
in
that
is,
the
rules
that
are
within
the
bylaw
are
ensuring
that
that
we
aren't
biased
and
that
we
are
fair
and
transparent,
and
then
that
that
section
basically
is
saying
to
the
staff
that
you
have
to
follow
those
rules
within
so
I
think
that
might
be
where
you're
going
counselor
and
then
I
think
the
the
piece
that
Brent
talked
about
in
terms
of
that
ability
for
someone
to
to
put
put
in
a
complaint
against
that.
They
didn't
think
that
we
were
there
is
that
process
in
there
as
a
follow-up
piece.
I
F
F
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Any
other
comments
or
questions
from
the
committee.
Okay,
seeing
none
are
have
any
visitors
joined
us
online,
none
great,
so
we
have
just
finished
with
the
information
it's
now
time
to
crystallize
this
and
set
it
up
for
Council
to
Chisel
their
will
into
a
stone
time
to
adopt
the
new
procurement
bylaw.
A
20-027
may
I
have
a
mover,
councilor,
Baum,
counselor
Dougherty
any
comments
or
questions
at
this
time.
Seeing
none
I
will
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you.
Does
anybody
have
any
motions,
seeing
none?
No
any
notices,
emotions
nope,
any
other
business,
none
and
any
correspondence
just
one.
The
date
of
our
next
meeting
will
be
October
12th
2022
at
6
pm.