►
Description
Committee of Adjustment from Monday, June 21, 2021. For the full meeting agenda, visit https://bit.ly/2UijwNY.
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
now
on
your
screen,
you'll
see
members
of
our
committee
of
adjustment
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
this
evening
and
even
though
you
won't
see
them,
you
will
hear
them
chime
in
from
time
to
time.
Our
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsay
staman
and
our
clerk
is
elizabeth
fawcett,
who
will
be
hosting
the
meeting
and
running
the
zoom
platform
from
behind
the
scenes.
A
If
you
are
the
applicant
or
the
agent-
and
you
have
nothing
further
to
add,
then
just
simply
say
so
next
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
at
that
time,
I'll
invite
members
of
the
public
to
raise
their
virtual
hand
in
zoom
if
they
have
any
questions
or
comments
in
respect
of
the
application.
Now,
if
you
do
have
a
question
or
if
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer.
A
It's
during
this
public
portion
of
the
meeting
that
we
will
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments,
and
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Will
the
questions
and
comments
be
addressed
by
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff,
and
next
I'll
invite
the
applicant
and
or
staff
to
address
those
public
comments,
after
which
I'll
go
back
to
the
committee.
Ask
them
to
make
a
motion
and
then
we
will
deliberate
on
the
application
at
that
time.
A
If
you're
the
applicant,
then
you're
free
to
leave
the
meeting
now
I'll
be
using
the
same
format
for
each
application
this
evening.
So
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell.
Now,
if
you
have
a
personal
interest
in
any
particular
application
and
you'd
like
to
receive
written
notice
of
tonight's
decision,
then
please
send
an
email
with
your
name
and
address
to
our
secretary
treasurer
lindsay
staman.
Her
email
address
is
l-s-t-h-a-m-a-n-n
at
cityofkingston.ca.
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
strew
you.
At
this
time.
I
can
confirm
that
we
have
quorum
to
begin
the
meeting.
I
would
like
to
note
that
mr
lightfoot
and
mr
sinha
are
currently
not
a
part
of
the
meeting
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
watching.
I
would
like
to
let
you
know
that
we
do
have
staff
members
present
in
the
meeting
to
assist
with
this
evening's
applications.
B
Tim
park
acting
director
of
planning
services,
james
barr,
acting
manager
of
development
approvals,
lindsey,
lambert,
senior
planner,
nyle,
odie
senior,
planner
tim
fisher,
planner,
jason,
partridge
planner,
lindsay
staman,
planner
and
secretary
treasurer
for
the
committee.
Ashley
anastasio,
planning,
intern
and
julia
mccarty.
Jasmine
is
our
host
for
this
evening
and
I
myself
and
melissa's
faucet,
as
the
chair
has
already
noted
at
this
time.
Mr
chair,
we
have
seven
applicants
and
agents
present
to
assist
with
the
applications
as
well
as
two
members
of
the
public
watching
from
the
gallery.
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
through
you,
we
have
received
word
from
staff
that
there
is
a
request
to
withdraw
application
number
eight
b
at
233
colborne
street.
This
would
require
consent
from
the
committee
in
order
to
do
so
and
can
be
included
within
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
Perhaps
mr
barr
can
just
speak
to
the
matter
briefly
to
allow
the
committee
an
opportunity
to
decide.
C
Thank
you
through
you,
mr
chair,
so
the
staff
are
requesting
withdrawal
of
the
application
at
233
colburn
street.
This
is
a
minor
variance
for
an
as
built
building,
so
usually
with
larger
development
projects.
Part
way
through
the
applicants
provide
as
bill
drawings,
to
building
services,
to
confirm
that
they
are
building
within
zone
compliance.
C
This
application
has
undergone
an
address
change.
It
used
to
be
235
colburn
street.
It
received
a
site-specific
zoning
bylaw
amendment
that
was
passed
september
3rd
2019,
so
this
minor
variance
is
technically
within
the
two-year
timeout
period,
where
an
application
for
minor
variants
cannot
be
have
a
decision
made
on
it.
So
we're
asking
withdrawal
of
the
application
tonight
to
be,
in
conformance
with
the
planning
act
and
we'll
see
this
application
come
forward
at
a
later
date
either.
A
Great
thanks
very
much
for
that
james
okay.
So
then
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda,
move
by
paul
seconded
by
vincent
as
amended.
Are
you
okay
with
the
amendment
to
the
the
motion?
Okay,
any
other
discussion
on
this,
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that
motion
carries
unanimously.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
confirmation
of
the
minutes
for
the
may
17th
meeting.
Has
everybody
had
an
opportunity
to
review
them?
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
any
other
disclosures
of
the
cuny
area
interest
and
I
see
none.
Okay,
thanks
for
that
paul
this
evening
we
have
no
delegations
and
there
are
no
requests
for
deferral
and
finally,
we
have
no
returning
deferred
items.
That's
point
number
seven.
So
now
we're
on
to
our
first
piece
of
new
business,
which
is
an
application
for
minor
variants,
1295
centennial
drive
lindsay.
Can
I
have
you
introduce
that
to
the
record?
Please.
E
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
through
you,
my
name
is
lindsay
lambert
and
I'm
participating
this
evening
to
present
an
application
for
minor
variants
for
property
located
at
1295
centennial
drive.
The
purpose
and
effect
of
the
application
is
to
reduce
the
minimum
off
street
parking
requirement
for
the
existing
food
processing
facility.
F
The
proposed
reduction
is
from
90
parking
spaces
to
72.
or
from
one
parking
space
per
100
square
meters
of
gross
floor
area
to
0.8
parking
spaces
per
100
square
meters
of
gfa
next
slide,
please,
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
cataract
way:
states
business
park,
west
of
centennial
drive
and
north
of
venture
drive
next
slide.
Please.
F
F
F
There
are
proposed
additions
located
to
the
north
west
and
south
of
the
existing
building
denoted
on
the
site
plan.
Those
have
received
approval
through
a
site
plan,
modification
application,
and
the
current
application
for
minor
variants
is
to
eliminate
the
parking
spaces
shown
shaded
in
green
at
the
top
of
the
of
the
site
plan
there.
F
F
A
G
H
Yeah,
so
my
question
is:
I'm
glad
that
it's
going
to
be
nice
landscapes,
green
space
instead
of
parking,
but
I'm
just
want
to
make
sure
it
was
mentioned.
There
was
a
letter
that
said
that
it
had
enough
parking
space,
so
this
won't
result
in
people
needing
fine
parking
elsewhere.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
going
to
end
up
being
a
problem
in
the
long
run.
Thanks.
G
F
Thank
you
through
you,
mr
chair.
Just
to
summarize
the
the
number
of
parking
spaces
used
on
a
daily
basis,
as
documented
in
the
parking
letter
submitted
with
the
application.
It
was
noted
that
approximately
15
office
staff
are
in
the
facility
per
day,
as
well
as
15
employees
per
eight
hour
shift,
along
with
approximately
five
visitors
per
day.
D
G
A
A
A
And
finally,
any
members
of
the
public
or
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
12
25
centennial
drive.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion,
a
decision
so
moved
by
vincent
and
seconded
by
blaine.
A
E
J
J
J
Here
is
the
key
map
and
neighborhood
context
map
from
the
exhibits
for
reference.
The
property
has
frontage
on
both
union
and
center
streets.
Next
slide,
please,
the
application
is
a
permission
to
enlarge
three
legal
non-conforming
residential
dwelling
units
within
the
existing
building's
footprint
next
slide.
J
This
is
the
site
plan
for
the
proposed
permission.
There
are
no
proposed
changes
to
the
building
footprint.
There
is
vehicle
access
from
union
street,
which
includes
three
parking
spots
at
the
rear
of
the
building.
The
subject
property
includes
the
beth
israel
congregation
center
next
slide,
please.
J
These
are
the
floor
plans
with
the
proposed
interior
changes
submitted
by
the
applicant.
The
first
floor
of
the
building
contains
an
underutilized
common
area.
The
existing
common
area
will
be
reconfigured
into
one
self-contained
residential
dwelling
unit.
The
second
unit,
which
is
comprised
over
the
first
and
second
floors,
will
be
retained.
The
two
residential
dwelling
units
on
the
second
floor
will
be
converted
into
one
unit.
The
proposed
renovations
are
subject
to
an
ontario
heritage,
trust
easement,
the
requirements
of
which
will
be
addressed
during
the
building
permit
stage.
J
A
K
Good
evening,
mr
chair,
sorry,
it
just
takes
a
second
to
get
all
the
buttons
clicked
it
does.
My
name
is
mike
keane
and
I'm
a
land
use
planner
with
foten
consultants.
The
address
is
for
cataract
way
street
in
kingston,
ontario,
suite
315,
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
owner.
I've
assisted
them
with
the
permission,
application
and
have
reviewed
the
recommendations
of
staff,
and-
and
I
have
I
have
nothing
to
add
at
this
time,
but
I
am
very
familiar
with
the
application
and
I'm
pleased
to
assist
with
any
questions.
A
A
A
And
are
any
members
of
the
public,
or
is
anybody
here
with
us
this
evening?
Who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
124
center
street?
Please
raise
your
hand
virtual
hand
and
I'll
call
a
final
time
or
any
members
of
the
public,
or
is
anybody
here
with
us
this
evening?
Who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
124
center
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I
do
see
mr
babin
yes
paul.
D
Sorry,
mr
chair,
I
just
maybe
this
question
is
more
to
staff
than
to
the
applicant
and
it
would
be
okay
to
ask
that
question.
Now.
That's
fine
yeah!
You
would
do
that.
I'm
a
little
confused
here
that
this
application
has
been
conditionally
approved
by
the
city
earlier
this
spring
and
for
some
reason
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
including
both
the
exterior
and
the
interior
changes,
or
is
that
part
of
the
building
permit
itself.
A
K
Just
briefly,
if
I
may,
mr
chair
just
for
the
committee's
benefit,
whenever
there
is
an
application
that
involves
a
heritage,
we
often
seek
advice
of
the
heritage
committee
first,
so
that
we
have
that
answer
when
we
come
to
you
for
the
actual
permissions
that
are
necessary.
So
that's
a
large
part
of
why
you're
seeing
a
little
bit
of
to
and
fro
and
and
because
they
are
wanting
to
start
a
lot
of
that
restoration
work
to
the
outside.
K
A
Okay,
so
on
that
note,
I
have
I'll
call
for
actually
a
fourth
time
for
any
public
comments.
Is
there
anybody
else
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
124
center
street,
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
so
formally
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
turn
it
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
paul.
A
A
L
L
Perfect,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
so
we
have
an
application
for
consent
and
minor
variants.
The
reason
why
the
consent
is
being
brought
forward
here
is
because
it
is
tied
in
with
a
minor
variance.
So,
therefore,
we
cannot
go
through
with
the
delegated
authority
process,
so
we
have
to
bring
both
applications
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
for
for
review
and
approval.
L
L
So
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
sever
a
1.6
hectare,
parcel
of
land
with
approximately
110
meters
of
road
frontage
on
horning
road
and
will
maintain
the
existing
single
detached
dwelling
and
detached
garage.
The
retained,
8.6
hectare,
parcel
of
undeveloped
land
will
have
approximately
80
meters
of
road
frontage
on
horny
road.
The
retained
parcel
is
also
subject
to
the
minor
variance
application
to
reduce
the
minimum
lot
frontage
requirement
from
100
meters
to
80
meters
to
recognize
the
retained
lot.
Frontage
next
slide.
L
Please,
as
we
see
here,
the
top
left
corner
would
be
the
proposed
separate
portion
and
the
gray
area
would
be
retained.
The
subject
property
is
adjacent
to
the
township
of
south
front,
which
is
actually
on
the
north
side
of
horning
road
and
is
in
a
location
which
abuts
a
majority
of
other
residential
uses.
L
L
So
the
requested
variance
here
section
10
to
be
two
minimum
lot
frontage.
The
requirement
here
for
lot
severances
for
a
retained
portion
is
100
meters.
The
proposed
lot
frontage
is
80
meters
and
the
requested
variance
is
20
meters.
Next
slide,
please,
as
you
can
see,
the
severed
portion
has
a
wider,
lock
frontage
and
the
reason
for
that
is
actually
to
accommodate
the
existing
development,
that's
actually
on
the
severed
lot.
L
L
We
are
looking
here
at
what
did
I
say
here:
approximately
eight
eight
hectares
next
slide
here,
please,
at
the
time
of
this
meeting,
we
have
received
no
written
public
comments
or
objections
which
that
we
received
the
date
and,
let's
see
here
so
the
the
proposed
sorry
here,
I'm
just
trying
to
go
through
something
real,
quick.
So
the
minimum
lot
frontage
or
retained
portion
provides
two
things.
L
So
if
we
do
look
at
road
frontages
within
hornet
road,
we
do
see
a
mixture
of
different
road
frontages
and
the
proposed
road
frontage
that
they
are
are
requesting
is
very
similar
to
the
existing
global
frontages.
So
it
is
going
to
be
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
of
the
neighborhood
and
also
will
not
change
the
the
streetscape
as
well
next
slide.
A
M
M
A
N
Another
question:
for
tim:
yes,
jordan,
tim,
it's
a
it'll,
be
a
quick
when
the
the
severed
parcel.
So
you
obviously
you're
splitting
this
bigger
lot
into
two.
Is
it?
Is
it
desirable
for
for
the
neighborhood
for
that
appropriate
development,
and
that
use
is
it?
Is
it
going
to
be
unusual
to
have
to
if
you
know,
if
the
second
parcel
becomes
a
residential
property?
Is
that
going
to
be
two
houses
closer
closer
to
each
other
than
anywhere
else
on
on
horning
road.
L
A
I
see
none
so
I'll
open.
The
public
portion
of
the
meeting
are
any
members
of
the
public
or
here
or
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
2355
horning
road.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
are
any.
Is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
2355
horning
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
third
and
final
call.
Is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
2355
hoarding
road?
A
A
A
L
D
L
L
Let's
see
and
is
within
an
established
residential
neighborhood,
which
is
developed
with
one
and
two
story:
dwellings:
the
site
is
within
walking
distance
to
third
avenue
park
to
the
north
and
also
the
kingston
memorial
center.
There
are
commercial
and
industrial
uses
along
princess
street
and
concession
street,
which
is
pretty
much
west
to
south
of
the
subject.
Property
next
slide,
so
the
variances
that
are
being
requested
here.
We
have
the
minimum
front
yard
depth.
The
requirement
for
this
is
7.5
meters.
L
L
L
As
you
can
see,
the
front
of
the
house
is
kind
of
designed
where
the
garage
actually
currently
sticks
out
from
the
house
and
then,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
right
side
on
the
west
elevation
there,
the
majority
of
the
house
is
actually
set
back
into
the
dwelling,
so
what
they
are
proposing
is
actually
bringing
the
face
of
the
building
out.
So
there's
I
guess
more
profile
to
the
to
the
front
of
the
dwelling.
L
L
Currently,
the
garage
projects,
approximately
two
meters
from
the
entrance
of
the
dwelling,
the
two-story
addition
to
the
front
of
the
dwelling,
will
square
off
the
front
and
is
designed
to
be
in
keeping
with
the
character
and
design
of
the
existing
dwellings.
A
side
yard
is
provided
on
either
side
of
the
dwelling
to
provide
access
to
the
rear.
L
L
The
proposal
is
desirable
and
appropriate
development
and,
as
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection,
41
error,
45
1
of
the
planning
act
and
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions
for
approval.
I
leave
this
in
your
hands
and
available
for
any
comments.
A
I
I
Hi
I'm
matt
girvin.
I
can't
seem
to
get
my
video
on
well
there.
We
are
okay,
good.
I
am
the
agent
for
the
applicants.
As
you
can
see
from
tim's
coverage.
There's
a
security
minor
application.
It
doesn't
stick
out
past
the
existing
building
in
the
sides.
They
just
they've
had
a
really
tough
entrance
way.
So
this
really
opens
up
the
entranceway
and
gives
them
an
extra
bedroom,
and
I
think
it
I
think
it
looks
better
too
the
house
being
stronger
than
the
actual
garage
itself.
I
A
A
So
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
or
is
anybody
here
this
evening
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
85
conaut
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
the
thermal
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
85
cannot
stream?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
and
I
see
none
so
I'll.
Come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
vincent
seconded
by
blaine.
A
A
E
O
Perfect,
as
lindsey
mentioned,
it's
a
permission,
application
for
137
resource
road,
the
purpose
and
effect
of
the
application
is
to
clarify
the
definition
of
professional
office,
which
is
to
enable
additional
professions
to
operate
under
this
permitted
use
within
the
m623
zone
of
zoning
biola
7626
next
slide.
Please.
O
I
suppose
the
the
darker
thicker
border
and
the
lands
are
currently
owned
by
the
city
of
kingston
as
part
of
the
cataract
way
estates
business
park
and
the
city
and
the
applicant
have
entered
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
to
purchase
the
lands
that
are
approximately
identified
by
the
red
rectangle
there
at
137
resource
road,
so
the
lands
themselves
again
they're
they're
located
within
the
cataract,
the
estates
business
park,
they're,
surrounded
by
similar
light
industrial
buildings
generally
located
east
of
gardner's,
road
and
south
and
west
of
centennial
road.
Next
slide.
Please.
O
So
the
request
of
permission
here
is
the
lands
are
in
the
m623
zone,
which
permits
professional
offices
as
a
permitted
use,
and
the
definition
of
professional
offices
is
provided
here
as
a
office
in
which
a
service
or
consultation
is
given,
and
there
are
a
variety
of
professions
listed
as
examples
within
the
definition
with
similar
uses
also
included
in
the
definition,
and
so
the
request
of
permission
is
actually
to
clarify
that
the
similar
uses
referenced
within.
That
definition
applies
to
the
requested
professions
by
the
the
applicant,
which
is
kingston
athletic
therapy
center.
O
The
uses
that
they're
seeking
to
establish
there
are
athletic
therapist,
massage
therapist,
concussion
rehabilitation,
psychologist
nutrition,
coach
and
life
coach
next
slide.
Please,
the
site
plan
that's
been
submitted
with
this.
Application
is
actually
concurrent
with
a
formal
site
plan
application.
O
That's
currently
going
through
the
technical
review
phase
right
now,
that's
d11005
2021,
so
the
the
concept
that's
that's
shown
here
is
is
actually
just
the
first
submission,
so
that
there's
likely
to
be
revisions,
but
the
general
gist
is
that
the
applicant
is
developing.
The
vacant
lands
with
a
four
unit,
light
industrial
building,
be
one
and
a
half
stories
in
height
surface
parking
to
the
north
and
to
the
west
on-site
storm
water
management,
pretty
pretty
typical
industrial
park
development
next
slide.
Please.
O
Industrial
building
the
first
floor
plan
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
screen
shows
professional
offices
they're,
taking
up
about
about
forty
percent
I'd
say
of
the
gfa
of
the
building,
and
that
is
the
proposed
unit
for
kingston
athletic
therapy
center,
the
operation
of
that
that
business
there's
a
wide
range
of
breadth
of
services
that
they
offer
and
it
doesn't
doesn't
fit
neatly
within
the
definition
of
professional
offices,
but
from
a
land
use
compatibility
perspective.
It
makes
sense
for
them
to
locate
there.
O
So
the
nature
of
this
application
is
just
to
tweak
that
definition
to
identify
the
the
professions
that
they
employ.
The
second
level
would
just
be
accessory
office
space
for
those
four
units.
Next
slide,
please
sample
elevations
that
have
been
submitted
with
the
application.
Just
confirmed
the
the
one
and
a
half
story.
Building
the
design
details
of
these
of
this
building
are
going
to
be
worked
out
through
the
concurrent
site
plan
application,
so
the
the
built
form
and
the
building
itself
really
doesn't
have
much
of
a
bearing
in
this
particular
application.
O
O
O
The
uses
associated
with
kingston
athletic
therapy
center,
as
described
in
the
report,
appear
to
conform
to
the
general
intent
of
professional
office,
as
defined
in
section
411a
of
zoning
biola
7626,
and
also
the
complementary
use
policies
for
general
industrial
designation
of
the
official
plan,
and
with
that
I
welcome
any
any
questions
from
the
committee.
Thank
you.
A
P
Q
A
I
actually
have
one
it's
more
for
staff,
I'm
just
wondering.
Does
the
tweaking?
Maybe
you
for
you
nile,
does
the
tweaking
of
this
definition.
I
think,
have
any
impact
on
future
applications
in
similar
zones.
I
mean
perhaps
extending
that
in
the
next
review,
say
of
either
the
official
plan
or
zoning
bylaws.
Will
this
profession
be
added
in
to
that
kind
of
grouping
for
zones
like
this.
O
O
No,
I
I
don't
think
so,
because
each
application
is
going
to
be
reviewed
individually
on
a
kind
of
a
case
by
case
basis
and
making
sure
that
any
of
the
permission
application
is
is
making
sense
from
a
lender's
compatibility
perspective.
So
the
as
part
of
the
review
of
the
report,
we
took
a
look
at
what
those
professions
were
that
were
listed
within
the
professional
office
definitioning
already
and
they're
they
don't.
O
A
A
So
are
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
137
resource
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
I'm
seeing
none.
So
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
137
resource
road.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
say
none
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
jordan.
A
A
E
E
E
E
In
this
site
plan,
drawing
I've
highlighted
the
side
yard
setback
in
yellow
that
we're
referring
to,
and
the
increase
in
the
building
depth
is
highlighted
in
green
in
the
zoomed
in
image
on
the
bottom
left,
you
can
see
the
increased
footprint
of
the
proposed
edition
a
little
more
clearly
here,
and
also
note
that
this
property
is
designated
under
the
ontario
heritage
act.
The
heritage
permit
associated
with
this
proposal
has
been
approved
next
slide,
please.
E
E
Next
slide,
please
signage
was
posted,
a
notice
was
mailed
and
a
courtesy
ad
was
placed
in
the
wig
standard.
No
public
comments
have
been
received
for
this
application.
Next
slide,
please.
In
summary,
the
planning
department
recommends
approval
of
this
application
subject
to
the
conditions,
in
exhibit
a
of
the
report.
I
leave
this
in
your
hands.
Mr
chair.
A
I
Matt
girvin
again
256
mode
out
of
new
case
in
ontario
and
the
agent
for
the
applicant.
I
think
that
lindsay
covered
it
pretty
well
just
a
couple
of
things
the
I
had
in
the
letter
that
I
sent
to
to
the
committee
adjustment.
I
had
noted
that
the
building
this
was
built
in
1998
1985
was
actually
1995..
I
I
actually
built
that
back
then,
when
I
first
might
collect
doing
this
renovation
for
this
edition.
I
looked
very
familiar,
but
I
couldn't
remember
until
a
couple
days
later
that
we'd
actually
built
it
way
back
when
time
flies.
It's
a
very
minor
addition.
You
know
in
terms
of
we're
going
a
couple
of
feet
back
and
it,
although
it's
it's
a
very,
very,
very
deep
light.
It
goes
back
behind
about
three
houses
on
on
on
the
street
next
door
and
there's
almost
no
front
yard.
I
A
No,
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
73
gore
street?
Please
raise
your
hand
virtual
hand.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
73
gore
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
73
gore
street.
A
A
E
E
E
E
So
the
applicant
is
requesting
two
variances.
The
first
is
to
increase
the
maximum
building
height
for
an
accessory
building
from
5
meters
to
5.9
meters.
This
is
to
help
accommodate
the
roof
peak
and
also
loft
space.
The
second
variance
is
to
reduce
the
setback
from
a
right-of-way.
In
this
case.
This
is
the
setback
from
the
point
road,
which
is
not
a
municipally
maintained
road
and
is
classified
as
a
private
right-of-way.
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
R
A
R
H
I
think
my
question
is
more
to
staff.
Say:
does
this
when
this
variance,
if
it
passes,
is
it
will
it
be
based
off
the
the
lowest
point,
not
the
grade
point?
Where
say,
I'm
not
saying
that
they
would
do
this,
but
like
go
higher
than
they
would
if
they,
if
it
was
at
the
granite
part,
do
you
know
what
I
mean.
E
E
For
you,
mr
chair,
the
way
that
the
zoning
bylaw
has
us
measure
height
in
this
case,
the
height
of
the
garage
that's
shown
here-
is
5.2
meters.
The
the
variance
of
5.9
would
allow
them
to
shift
the
garage
just
slightly
off
of
that
granite,
if
required.
Okay,
if
it
was
shifted
off,
it
would
measure
at
5.9.
A
A
A
Is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
11
the
point
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
one
third
and
final
call:
does
anybody
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
11
the
point
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
jordan.
A
Any
any
questions
or
discussion.
No,
I
thought
it
was
a
great
idea
or
recommendation
from
staff
to
build
in
the
5.9
meter.
I
thought
that
was
that
was
good
and
very
client
centered,
so
kudos
to
you.
So
then
all
in
favor
therefore
raise
your
hands,
and
that's
unanimously
carried
just
noting
that
paul
has
declared
a
pecuniary
interest.
A
A
I
don't
see
anything
there.
There
is.
I
have
no
correspondence
at
all
and
the
date
of
the
next
meeting
has
been
noted
to
be
monday
july
19th.
So
I
guess
right
now.
We've
come
to
the
point
where
I
need
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
moved
by
paul
and
seconded
by
blaine
and
mosh
on
all
in
favor
raise
your
hands
and
that's
unanimously
carried
motion
adjourned
at
6
35
pm.