►
Description
Committee of Adjustment from October 18, 2021. For the full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3BX96EA.
A
D
Your
screen-
yes,
second
peter-
I
have
to
do
a
little
intro
before
you
get
into
yours.
That's
a
new
thing.
We
have
to
do
so.
Okay,
sorry
I'll
just
quickly
go
over
confirm
that
we
have
all
members
in
attendance
tonight,
with
the
exception
of
paul
babin
and
samnath
sinha
for
staff
in
attendance.
We
have
james
barr,
the
manager
of
development
approvals,
jason
partridge,
planner
ricardo,
peggy,
planner,
tim
fisher,
planner,
stephen
chu,
senior
planner
and
lindsey
staman,
the
secretary
treasurer.
D
A
Okay,
thanks
very
much
so
good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
now
on
your
screen.
You'll
see
members
of
our
committee
of
adjustment
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
who
have
worked
hard
to
make
the
meeting
possible.
Our
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsey
stayman
and
you've
already
heard
from
our
clerk
derek
o'shea.
A
So
we
have
five
agenda
items
this
evening
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
the
format
that
I'll
be
using
to
navigate
through
each
application,
I'm
going
to
start
by
introducing
an
application
and
then
I'll
give
each
applicant
or
their
agent
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further.
If
you
have
nothing
further
to
add,
then
simply
say
so
next
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
at
that
time.
I'll
invite
you
to
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom.
A
If
you
have
any
questions
or
comments
you
wish
to
make
in
respect
of
an
application.
Now,
if
you
have
a
question
or
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer.
It's
during
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
that
we'll
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments,
and
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion.
Will
the
questions
and
comments
be
addressed
by
either
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff.
A
I'm
going
to
be
calling
three
times
for
public
comments
before
I
close
the
public
portion
next
I'll
invite
the
applicant
or
staff
to
address
those
public
comments,
after
which
I'll
come
back
to
the
committee,
ask
them
to
make
a
motion
and
then
we'll
ultimately
deliberate
on
the
application.
At
that
point,
if
you're
the
applicant
you're
free
to
leave
the
meeting,
then
we
just
rinse
and
repeat:
we
repeat
because
I'll
be
using
the
same
format
for
every
application
this
evening
and
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell.
A
A
So
I'll
now
call
on
derek
our
clerk
to
confirm
quorum,
derek
chair,
we
do
have
quorum.
Thank
you.
So
now
I'll
call
the
meeting
to
order
at
5,
33
p.m
and
I'll
refer
you
to
the
agenda
committee
members.
Can
I
call
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda,
please
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
vincent
and.
A
Yep
blaine
and
vincent
everybody
received
the
addendums
today:
okay,
very
good.
Yes,
thanks
very
much
for
that.
So
any
discussion
all
in
favor
raise
your
physical
hand
and
that's
unanimously
carried
all
right.
So
we
now
are
down
to
confirmation
of
the
minutes
of
the
september.
The
20th
meeting
everybody's
had
a
chance
to
review
the
minutes.
A
A
No,
I
see
they're
all
head
shaking.
No,
so
that's
good
are
there.
We
have
no
delegations
and
there
are
no
requests
for
deferral
and,
furthermore,
item
number
seven,
there
are
no
returning
deferred
items.
So
the
first
piece
of
new
business
we
have
is
for
an
application
for
minor
variants
and
consent,
3224
creekford
road
lindsay.
Can
I
please
ask
you
to
introduce
this
into
the
record.
E
F
F
The
purpose
and
effect
of
this
of
the
consent
application
is
to
sever
off
lands,
municipally
known
as
three
two
two
four
creek
river
road
to
create
a
new
parcel
of
land.
The
summer
parcel
is
proposed
to
have
an
area
of
1.02
hectares
and
will
have
approximately
61
meters
of
lot
frontage
along
creekford
road.
The
retained
lot
will
have
21.47
hectares
of
land
with
88.5
meters
of
front
edge
along
creek
river
road.
F
The
purpose
and
effect
of
the
minor
variance
application
is
to
request
relief
from
the
minimum
lot
frontage
of
within
an
a2
zone
of
zoning
bylaw
7626
from
the
required
1.6
meters
to
88.5
meters
for
the
severed
land.
Only
next
slide,
please
so
the
minor
variance
is
for
bylaw
7626
lot
frontage.
The
proposal
is
88.5
meters
and
the
requirement
is
100.6
meters
and
the
requested
variance
is
12.1
meters
next
slide,
please.
F
F
So
this
is
the
site
plane
right
here.
So
at
the
bottom
is
the
severed
lot,
which
would
be
1.02
hectares
of
land
and
the
retained
law
which
is
in
the
hash
mark,
would
be
21.47
hectares
of
land
next
slide,
please
so
the
requested
consent
application
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
the
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
by
le
7626.
F
Appropriate
conditions
are
included
in
the
conditions
of
consent
as
permitted
under
section
5312..
The
proposed
minor
variance
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection,
45
1
of
the
planning
act.
An
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
propose
conditions.
Approval
of
this
application
will
create
a
new
lot
with
a
single
family
dwelling
use
on
each
on
each
lot.
A
G
G
G
In
short,
the
single
family
dwelling,
that's
on
the
existing
parcel
is
proposed
to
be
severed
off
on
that
bait
on
that
proposed,
one-hectare
severed
parcel,
while
the
retained
lot
would
be
vacant,
approximately
50
acres
in
size
and
future
developed
with
a
single
family
dwelling.
We've
reviewed
both
conditions
before
you
this
evening,
as
it
relates
to
the
minor
variance
application
and
that
of
the
consent
application,
and
we
have
no
objections
or
concerns
with
any
of
those
included
for
consideration.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
behalf
of
the
owners.
A
A
Again
I'll
call
for
a
second
time:
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
or
anybody
in
the
gallery
this
evening?
Who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
3224
creekford
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
my
third
and
final
call
do
we
have
anybody
with
us
this
evening
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
3224
creekford
road.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I
see
none.
Oh
I
see
vincent.
You
have
a
question
or
a
point.
A
Okay,
so
if
you
are
logged
in
through
the
telephone
and
you
wish
to
raise
your
hand,
press
star
9
and
then
we
can
log
you
into
the
meeting
and
I'm
not
seeing
a
sternum
unless
it's
a
rotary
dial,
but
no,
I
think
we're
good
thanks
for
that
vincent.
So
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
somnath
and
seconded
by
greg.
A
A
A
C
C
C
It
is
subject
to
site-specific
zone
b
303
zone
b-303
in
2015
was
amended
to
allow
the
following
on
each
property:
a
single
unit
dwelling
at
111
williams,
street,
a
doctor's
office
and
dwelling
unit
at
180,
182,
baggett
street
and
the
subject
property
at
184
baggett
was
allowed
a
single
unit.
Dwelling
parking
for
180
182
baguette
was
to
be
provided
on
184
and
in
2021.
C
C
C
Four
parking
spots
are
located
at
the
broad,
the
back
of
the
property
accessed
by
a
shared
driveway,
with
194
bagot
street
to
the
north
and
skip
ahead.
Please
for
more
context.
Here's
a
rendering
of
the
proposed
dwelling
with
the
existing
neighboring
properties
next
slide,
please
so
variance
number
one
is
for
the
length
of
the
parking
stalls
which
are
required
to
be
6
meters
long.
The
reduction
in
length
is
to
allow
for
vehicles
to
more
easily
exit
the
site
next
slide.
C
The
parking
spots
satisfy
the
requirements
of
zone
b303
to
provide
four
parking
spots,
three
of
which
are
for
180
182
baggett
street
next
slide.
Variance
two
is
to
increase
the
exterior
wall,
height,
0.2
meters.
Above
the
seven
meter
requirement,
it
is
noted
that
the
overall
height
of
the
building
is
within
the
building
height
requirement
of
10.62
meters.
C
C
I
note
that
there
is
one
piece
of
cor
public
correspondence
related
to
access
that
we
receive
today,
and
I
also
note
that
the
property
is
currently
subject
to
a
site
plan
control
application
for
the
construction
of
the
house
site
plan
control
was
required
as
the
property
is
located
in
a
designated
heritage.
District.
A
G
In
short,
in
summary,
the
site-specific
zoning
on
the
adjacent
parcels
has
caused
some
challenges
with
respect
to
adhering
to
zoning
requirements
on
this
parcel
184
bagot
street,
and
the
fact
that
the
use
single
family
dwelling
has
been
long
standing
as
it
relates
to
what
has
been
proposed
on
the
site.
The
variances,
in
our
opinion,
are
appropriate.
G
Most
importantly,
I'd
like
to
point
out
the
fact
that
heritage
permit
has
already
been
received
approval
through
heritage
kingston,
as
it
relates
to
this
infill
project.
I
think
that's
noteworthy
as
it
relates
to
an
underutilized
urban
parcel
that
can
be
adequately
infilled
with
a
with
a
single
family
dwelling.
G
As
mr
pegia
mentioned,
site,
plan
control
is
required
and
it's
ongoing
through
the
technical
process,
technical
review
process
and
it's
anticipated
that
that
be
concluded
in
the
near
future.
Should
approval
be
granted
this
evening
to
ensure
that
the
rest,
the
actual
confines
of
the
building,
are
prescribed
and
registered
on
title
to
limit
what
may
be
developed
on
that
site,
given
the
the
single
family
dwelling
use
again,
I'm
on
one
further
point.
G
The
the
piece
of
correspondence
received
this
late
today
is
related
to
the
right-of-way,
the
rear
of
the
property
in
providing
access
to
adjacent
parcels,
and
through
this
application
I
think
you
can
see
clearly
in
the
slides
presented
that
the
proposal
does
not
seek
to
adhere
or
inhibit
access
across
that
right-of-way.
It's
proposed
to
be
maintained,
so
there
would
be
no
adverse
effect
on
the
neighboring
property
owners
with
respect
to
access.
A
I
G
G
I
could
be
somewhat
off
with
my
date,
but
but
if
I,
if
I'm
accurate,
the
site,
specific
zoning
originally
came
into
effect
in
2015
for
this
parcel
and
the
30
landscape,
open
space
came
into
effect
in
2017,
so
the
the
landscaped
open
space
really
was
an
afterthought
with
respect
to
the
overall
development
of
this
parcel
and
should
or
would
or
or
sorry
have,
the
applicant
constructed
the
single-family
dwelling
in
advance.
In
that
two-year
time
frame,
then
it
would
have
been
recognized
as
legal
non-conforming
at
at
nine
percent
plus
or
minus.
J
Thank
you
for
you,
mr
chair.
I
do
I
am
unable
to
turn
on
my
video
at
this
time.
It
says
I
cannot
start
my
video
because
it
has
been
stopped
there
we
go
excellent.
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
mr
sands
is
correct
in
his
recollection
that
landscaped,
open
space
was
only
added
to
the
zoning
by
law
in
2017,
so
when
the
property
was
initially
zoned
in
2015,
that
was
not
a
requirement
when
the
properties
were
rezoned
in
well.
I
guess
this
property
was
not
rezoned
in
2020.
J
the
southern
parcel
was
the
provisions
were
not
amended
for
this
northern
partial,
so
there
was
no
reconsideration
of
that
at
that
time.
If
you
look
at
the
myth,
the
the
merits
of
this
project
in
the
staff
report,
it
is
identified
that
there
is
a
very
low
landscape,
open
space
already
on
this
site,
because
it
is
used
as
a
parking
lot.
J
I
think
the
landscaped
open
space
is
at
two
or
three
percent,
so
the
increase
in
the
increase
of
landscape
open
space
on
this
property
is
really
a
creature
of
the
redevelopment
of
it.
So
we
are
seeing
a
positive
net
increase
in
the
amount
of
landscape
open
space
being
developed
on
this
site,
while
still
accommodating
all
of
the
required
parking
for
both
parcels,
as
well
as
new
development,
which
intensifies
our
urban
area,
while
increasing
the
green
and
landscaped
open
space
within
the
city.
H
J
J
No
thank
you
and
it's
a
great
question.
This
is
an
interesting
property
because
in
the
site
specific
zone,
there
is
a
requirement
that
an
accessible
parking
space
be
provided
for
the
doctor's
office
on
the
adjacent
property,
so
at
180,
182,
bagot
street,
but
182
182
vega
street
was
recently
rezoned
and
no
longer
requires
the
office
space
to
be
developed.
J
So
there's
no
longer
a
requirement
for
an
accessible
parking
space,
and
if
you
read
the
zoning
bylaw
for
accessible
parking
spaces,
triplex's,
which
is
what's
being
developed
next
door
is
not
required
to
have
an
accessible
parking
space.
Much
like
a
single
detached
dwelling
or
a
semi-detached
dwelling
or
a
second
residential
unit.
So
no
accessible
parking
spaces
are
proposed
to
be
developed
required
to
be
developed
on
this
site.
J
So
it
would
only
be
anticipated
that
regular
vehicle
movements
would
be
accommodated
in
that
back
portion
because
they
actually
do
not
have
the
room
in
order
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
accessible
parking
space
in
terms
of
width,
as
well
as
the
accessible
aisle
that
will
be
required.
Next
to
it.
H
J
I
could
defer
maybe
to
mr
sands
for
the
long-term
knowledge
on
the
rezoning
of
this
property,
but
it
does
meet
all
requirements
of
our
zoning
bylaw
for
aisle
width
and
access.
So
I
imagine
there
would
be
some
flexibility
while
it
would
be
tight,
it
could
accommodate
vehicle
movements.
I
don't
know
if
mr
sands
has
anything
to
supplement
my
answer,
but
I
defer
to
him.
G
G
A
5.2
meter,
parking
stall,
depth
and
or
a
6
meter
parking
stall
depth
is
augmented
by
a
6.0
meter,
wide
access
aisle
to
facilitate
that
in
and
out
movement
in
in
that
in
that
area.
So
this
proposal,
from
as
it
relates
to
to
greater
development
that
that
you
typically
see
access
aisles
and
again
I'm
drawing
the
parallels
to
sort
of
a
commercial
type
development
because
of
the
lack
of
of
comparison
in
this
area.
G
It
actually
exceeds
the
width
by
0.91,
nearly
an
extra
meter
so
from
from
site
functionality,
perspective,
there's
confidence
from
the
applicant
that
there
would
be
maneuverability
and
access
in
and
out
of
one
of
those
5.2
stalls
back
out.
So
there
could
be
driving
in
and
out
of
that
site,
as
opposed
to
forcing
someone
to
reverse
out
of
the
entirety
and
back
out
onto
baggage
street.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
committee
members.
Thanks
for
that
jason
and
james
okay,
I
see
none.
So
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
open
up
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting?
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
180
for
bagot
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
do
we
have
anybody
here
this
evening?
Who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
184
bagot
street?
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
I'll
call
one
third
and
final
time
to
have
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
184
beggar
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
jordan
and
seconded
by
blaine.
A
A
E
F
F
The
purpose
and
effect
of
the
minor
variance
application
is
to
request
relief
from
the
requirements
regarding
the
interior
yard
width
in
the
rear
yard,
depth
setback
to
build
an
approximately
52
square
meter
accessory
building
within
the
rear
yard
of
the
property.
The
resulting
new
new
rear
yard
accessory
building
complies
with
all
minimum
front
yard,
depth,
height
landscape,
open
space
requirements
next
slide,
please
so
there's
two
minor
variances
for
this
project:
one
is
for
the
interior
side,
width
and
they're,
proposing
1.83
meters
and
the
requested
variance
is
2.67
meters.
F
F
F
Next
slide,
please,
the
requested
variants
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
by
law
3274..
The
proposal
is
desirable.
Appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
instruction
requested
variances
are
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection
45
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
F
A
A
All
okay,
very
good,
so
committee
members,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
or
for
staff
and
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting?
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
2649
sixth
concession
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
address
or
speak
to
the
application
for
2649
concession
road?
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
the
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
2649
sixth
concession
road.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
emotion,
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
somnath.
A
A
E
K
The
property
is
designated
residential
in
the
official
plan
and
zoned
one
family
dwelling,
a
one
zone
in
zoning
by
law,
eight,
four,
nine
nine.
The
site
is
developed
with
a
single
detached
dwelling
or
a
bungalow.
In
this
case,
with
a
subgrade
attached
garage,
the
subject:
property
is
located
in
the
strathcona
neighborhood.
K
The
site
is
adjacent
to
one
and
two-story
single,
detached
dwellings
to
the
north,
south
and
west.
The
site
backs
onto
strathmona
park,
which
is
east
of
the
site
and
there's
also
a
pathway
leading
from
hampstead
heath
to
the
park,
which
is
located
along
the
northern
lot
line
between
the
subject,
property
and
33
amsterdam.
K
K
However,
the
the
proposed
site
plan
was
read
inc
incorrectly.
Due
to
there
was
two
lines
that
appeared
to
be
possibly
the
the
property
line.
However,
it
was
determined
that
the
property
line
was
actually
the
one
that
was
set
back
further,
so
we
had
to
amend
the
variance
here.
Therefore,
the
the
variance
being
sought
tonight
is
the
requirement
is
7.5
meters.
K
The
proposed
is
six
meters
and
the
variance
requested
is
actually
1.5
meters,
so
the
intent
of
the
minimum
front
yard
setback
requirement
actually
has
two
functions.
The
first
function
is
to
provide
a
minimum
setback
for
residential
development,
resulting
in
a
uniform
development
and
streetscape,
while
providing
a
landscape
buffer
between
the
street
and
the
facade
of
the
dwelling.
K
So
the
proposed
six
meter
setback
will
be
in
keeping
with
the
existing
built
form
and
their
existing
setbacks
along
hampton
heath
and
will
not
have
any
negative
impacts
on
the
streetscape.
The
proposed
setback
will
also
maintain
the
minimum
length
requirement
for
parking
space
on
the
subject
property
within
the
driveway
itself.
K
So,
as
we
could
see
here
from
the
site
plan
on
the
left,
we
have
the
existing
and
on
the
right
is
the
proposed.
They
are
proposing
a
two-story
addition
and
a
vestibule
for
the
front
entry.
I
like
to
just
make
note
that
the
vestibule
actually
complies
with
all
requirements,
so
the
requirement
or
I'm
sorry,
the
variance
requested-
is
for
the
for
the
for
the
two-story
edition,
which
is
for
the
for
the
garage
and
the
second
story.
K
So
the
variance
is
considered
minor,
as
the
dwelling
and
its
addition
will
remain
largely
consistent
with
built
form
and
size
of
the
properties
in
the
immediate
area
and
specifically,
the
adjacent
residential
properties.
No
adverse
impacts
on
neighboring
properties
will
result
from
will
result.
Sorry
from
the
partial
two-story
addition
to
the
west,
half
of
the
existing
structure.
G
K
Switch
slides,
so
this
is
a
proposed
elevation
of
what
the
of
what
the
house
could
look
like.
The
proposed
edition
will
allow
for
a
more
functional
residential
unit
by
relocating
basement
bedrooms
to
the
second
story.
Actually
we'll
switch
slides
here
here
we
go
so
as
you
can
see
the
first
story
and
second
story.
K
The
master
bedroom
will
also
be
maintained
on
on
the
ground
story.
Here,
the
current
subgrade
garage
results
in
drainage
and
also
functionality
issues
the
proposed
act
grade
attached
garage
will
be
accessible
for
parking
and
address
draining
issues
or
drainage
issues
to
the
dwelling.
Direct
access
to
the
garage
from
the
dwelling
will
be
located
within
the
proposed
fourier,
and
the
requested
variants
will
maintain
a
surface
parking
space
in
front
of
the
garage
which
will
comply
with
the
minimum
length
of
a
parking
space.
K
K
At
this
time
there
are
no
written
public
comments
or
objections
received
to
date,
and
I
am
unaware
if
there
is
anybody
attending
to
speak
to
this
next
slide
there
please,
the
recommendation.
The
requested
variance,
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plane
and
zoning
bylaw.
A
A
A
No,
I
see
all
head
shaking
no
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
here
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
39
hampstead
heath,
and
I
think
I
see
the
only
two
public
attendees
or
the
applicants,
but
I'll
I'll
continue
to
call.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
39,
hamsted
heath?
A
A
L
L
L
L
L
L
This
is
the
key
map
for
the
neighborhood.
It's
part
of
a
plan
of
subdivision
I'd
like
to
draw
to
the
committee's
attention
that
the
lot
in
question
is
deeper
than
the
lots
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
street
and
the
lots
in
general.
Overall.
This
is
one
of
the
deepest
lots
in
the
subdivision,
and
it
is
approximately
10
meters
deeper
than
a
typical
lot
in
the
subdivision.
L
L
The
actual
setbacks
from
the
yar
from
the
lot
lines
actually
complies
with
the
zoning
bylaw
and,
as
you
can
see,
there's
still
29
feet
approximately
from
the
the
large,
the
the
deck
to
the
the
rear
lock
line
and
that
there
are
still
substantial
side
yards
around
the
deck
next
slide.
Please
this
is
a
updated
or
additional
site
plan
provided
by
the
applicant.
L
So
the
the
front
of
the
lot
is
on
the
lower
left
side,
which
is
finth
street,
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
house
extends
back
from
that
areas
and
then
the
the
darkened
hatched
area
is
the
proposed
pool
deck
around
the
pool
and,
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
more
detailed
distance,
the
shortest
distance
to
the
rear.
Lot
lines
or
the
the
back
part
of
the
lot
is
27
feet
and
a
bit
and
more
than
31
feet
for
the
rest
of
it.
L
B
L
L
Next
slide,
please,
the
recommendation
is
that
the
requested
variants
maintain
the
general
purpose
and
intent
of
the
city's
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw,
the
proposed
application,
or
the
proposed
pool,
structure
or
deck
structure
and
the
requested
minor
variances
are
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
it
is
recommended
that
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
of
subsection
45,
one
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
attached
conditions.
A
L
A
There
wasn't
anyone
else
all
right.
Well,
that's
fine!
So
committee
members,
you
have
any
questions
for
staff
or
if
the
applicant
were
here
a
question
for
them,
I
see
all
heads
shaking
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1079
finch
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom.
A
A
All
right
so
moving
on
with
our
agenda,
there
are
no
motions.
We
have
no
notices
of
motions,
no
pieces
of
other
business
listed
here
unless
committee
members
you
wanted
to
bring
something
up.
I
don't
see
anything
there,
there's
no
correspondence,
so
the
date
of
the
next
meeting
is
set
for
november,
the
15th
at
5
30
pm.