►
Description
Committee of Adjustment meeting from June 20, 2022. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3HIBE8E
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
now
on
the
screen,
you'll
see
members
of
our
committee
of
adjustment
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
this
evening
who
are
working
hard
to
make
this
evening's
meeting
possible.
Our
clerk
is
lindsay,
I'm
sorry,
our
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsay
staman
and
our
clerk
is
ian
sullivan
and
together
they
are
hosting
the
zoom
platform
and
running
the
meeting
from
behind
the
scenes.
So
you
will
be
hearing
them
chime
in
from
time
to
time,
although
you
might
not
necessarily
see
them
now.
A
The
agenda
and
the
schedules
for
this
evening's
meeting
are
posted
on
dash
on
the
city's
website
and,
if
you
don't
have
those
documents
and
you'd
like
to
follow
along,
please
feel
free
to
access
them
now.
So
we
have
eight
items
on
the
agenda
this
evening
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
the
format
that
I'll
be
using
as
we
navigate
through
each
application.
A
I'll
start
by
introducing
an
applicant
and
I'll
give
the
applicant
or
their
agent
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further.
If
you
have
nothing
further
to
add,
then
simply
say
so
next
I'll
turn
over
to
the
committee
and
I'll
ask
members
of
the
committee
to
or
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant,
the
agent
or
staff
and
after
that
we'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
now
at
that
time,
I'll
invite
you
to
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom.
A
If
you
have
any
questions
or
you
wish
to
make
a
comment
in
respect
of
an
application.
Now,
if
you
do
have
a
question
or
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer,
because
it's
only
during
this
public
portion
of
the
meeting,
we
physically
record
the
questions
in
the
comments
and
it's
only
after
we
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
A
A
Now,
if
you
have
a
personal
interest
in
any
particular
application
this
evening
and
you'd
like
to
receive
written
notice
of
tonight's
decision,
then
please
send
an
email
with
your
name
and
address
to
our
secretary
treasurer
lindsay
stamen.
Her
email
address
is
l-s-t-h-a-m-a-n-n
at
city
of
kingston
dot,
c-a,
be
sure
to
include
your
name,
your
address
and,
most
importantly,
the
file
number
of
the
application
and
then
you'll
be
included
on
future
mail
outs.
B
Good
evening,
mr
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
I
did,
I
can't
confirm
we
do
have
quorum
with
regrets
from
jordan
to
keno's
levy
joining
us
from
staff.
This
evening
we
have
james
barr,
the
manager
of
development
approvals.
We
have
tim
fisher,
planner,
megan,
jason,
partridge,
planner,
megan
robbie
do
intermediate
planner,
we
have
lindsey
stayman,
the
intermediate
planner
and
secretary
treasurer
jared
gautier
is
also
the
deputy
acting
deputy
city
clerk
is
meeting
host
this
evening
and
I
am
ian
sullivan
the
committee
clerk.
A
Very
good
thanks
very
much
so
on
that
I'm
going
to
call
the
meeting
to
order
at
5,
33
p.m
and
I'll
refer
you
to
the
agenda.
So
committee
members,
I'm
sure
everybody
has
had
we've
received
an
addendum
late
this
afternoon.
Everybody
have
you
all
received
that
just
by
nodding
your
heads.
Okay,
we
see
that
so
I'm
going
to
call
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
with
the
addendum,
all
right
so
moved
by
vincent
and
seconded
by
greg
any
discussion.
A
A
A
C
Thanks
and
through
you
chair,
that
is
deferred
until
the
july
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
proper
notice
wasn't
given
to
the
planning
act.
The
sign
wasn't
posted
10
days
in
advance,
and
we
found
this
at
a
little
too
late,
so
we're
requesting
deferral
of
the
application
here
today
so
that
it
can
be
heard
on
the
july.
I
believe
it's
16th
and
ian
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
committee
of
adjustment
date.
A
D
A
Clear,
oh
well,
that's
actually
a
good
point,
everybody!
I
know
we've
received
that
I
that
was
listed
under
it
is
actually
in
fact,
in
the
agenda
or
on
correspondence.
Item
number
11..
Okay,
thank
you!
So
we'll
have
an
and
I'm
quite
interested
in
that
as
well.
So
I'm
glad
you
did
bring
that
up,
but
I
think
we're
covered
there.
Okay,
thank
you,
okay!
So
the
first
piece
of
new
business
we
have
is
an
application
for
a
minor
variance,
1177
bentley
terrace.
E
F
F
F
F
Zoning
bylaw
7626
includes
the
deck
stairs
and
landings
as
part
of
the
deck.
Therefore,
the
total
area
of
the
deck
is
actually
37
square
meters,
so
the
variance
that
is
being
sought
for
here
is
a
request
of
seven
square
meters,
and
it
is
important
to
note
that,
under
the
new
zoning
bylaw,
no
variances
would
be
required
as
it
would
comply
with
the
minimum
square
or
sorry
the
maximum
square
meters,
as
the
stairs
have
been
removed
from
the
definition
of
deck
and
under
a
separate
provision.
F
The
floodplain
setback,
the
variance,
is
also
requested
to
reduce
the
setback
from
a
floodplain
from
7.6
meters
to
6.1
meters
to
recognize
the
closest
point
of
the
deck
to
the
flood
plain,
the
variance
is
not
applied
to
the
entire
the
entirety
of
the
deck.
However,
the
variants
will
recognize
the
location
of
the
deck
next
slide.
F
Just
like
to
note
that
the
crca
comments
commented
that
they
have
no
concerns,
subject
to
obtaining
a
a
permit
under
o-reg
148-06
from
the
conservation
authority,
and
this
will
be
addressed
through
the
building
permit
application
process
again
through
the
new
zoning.
Bylaw.
No
variance
would
be
required,
as
the
definition
of
the
floodplain
has
changed
to
high
watermark
and
in
the
calculation
this
deck
would
actually
comply
with
the
high
watermark
setback.
F
The
requested
variances
are
considered
minor
as
there
are
no
anticipated
negative
off-site
impacts.
The
proposed
use
is
permitted
within
the
zoning
bylaw
and
the
proposal
will
comply
with
the
provisions
of
the
new
zoning
bylaw.
The
subject
property
drops
in
grade
at
the
rear
of
the
lot,
which
provides
a
walk-out
basement.
F
The
subject
property
will
continue
to
function
appropriately,
as
the
driveway
will
be
maintained
from
bentley
terrace
and
a
rear
yard
will
be
maintained.
The
existing
means
of
egress
and
ingress
from
the
dwelling
are
maintained
and
the
deck
will
provide
safe
outdoor
amenity
space,
which
will
be
accessed
from
the
main
level
with
safe
access
to
the
rear
yard.
The
variance
is
desirable
and
appropriate
use
of
the
land
and
will
be
in
line
with
the
zoni
violet
provisions
of
zoning
bylaw.
F
Twenty
two
six
two
next
slide:
public
consultation,
public
notice
was
mailed
to
all
property
owners
within
60
meter,
radius
of
the
properties,
signage
was
posted
on
site
and
a
courtesy
ad
was
posted
in
the
kingston
week
standard
to
date
we
have
received
no
public
comments
or
concerns
next
slide,
so
the
requested
variances
maintain
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
zoning.
Sorry
of
both
the
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
7626
and
the
provisions
of
zoning
bylaw
2020
to
62..
F
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land,
and
the
requested
variances
are
minor
in
nature.
Approval
of
this
application
will
permit
the
construction
of
a
rear
deck
to
an
existing
single
detached
dwelling.
The
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
conditions
attached,
as
exhibit
a
to
report
number
coa22050.
A
A
A
And
I'm
seeing
nunsal
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1177
bentley
terrace?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
I'll
call
a
second
time.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
11
77
bentley
terrace?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1177
bentley
terrace.
A
A
A
E
F
Hi,
thank
you
through
mr
chair.
This
application
is
for
minor
variants
for
295
emerald
street.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
to
construct
a
10.2
square
meter.
Three
season
unheated
room
in
place
of
an
existing
10
square
meter,
rear
deck
next
slide.
Please,
the
subject:
property
is
developed
with
a
bungalow
with
a
single
car
garage
fronting
on
emerald
street.
F
As
you
can
see,
the
requirement
is
six
meters.
The
applicant
is
proposing
4.6
meters
and
the
variance
requested
is
1.4
meters.
It
is
important
to
note
here
that
a
deck
is
permitted
to
be
within
this
location.
However,
the
three
season
sun
room
is
treated
as
living
space.
So
therefore
it
is
part
of
the
principal
structure
and
therefore
required
to
comply
with
the
performance
standards
for
the
the
principal
structure
and
not
the
dac
provisions.
F
F
Okay,
next
slide,
please
all
right,
so
the
deck
is
highlighted
in
yellow
or
sorry
the
where
the
deck
is
currently
is
highlighted
in
yellow
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
proposed
sun
room
with
the
elevations
on
the
the
left-hand
side.
So
the
subject
property
is
developed
with
a
one-story
single
detached
dwelling,
the
proposed
one
or
sorry
10.2
square
meter,
three-season
sunroom,
is
at
the
rear
of
the
dwelling
and
will
provide
living
space
to
the
residential
use.
F
The
variance
is
considered
minor
as
the
development
is
in
keeping
with
the
scale
and
design
of
the
existing
residential
development
in
the
neighborhood.
The
proposal
is
not
anticipated
to
have
any
negative
impacts
on
the
abutting
residential
uses.
The
sun
room
is
located
in
the
rear
yard
and
will
not
be
visible
from
the
street.
Therefore,
it
will
have
no
impacts
on
the
streetscape
or
character
of
the
neighborhood.
F
F
The
variance
is
considered
desirable
and
appropriate
use
of
the
land.
Next
slide.
Please
public
consultation.
As
for
the
planning
act,
public
notice
was
mailed
to
all
property
owners
within
the
60
meter.
Radius
of
the
property
signage
was
posted
on
site
and
the
courtesy
ad
was
placed
in
the
case
of
big
standard.
Today
we
have
received
no
public
comments
or
concerns
next
slide.
F
A
H
Good
evening,
mr
chair
and
the
committee
members,
my
name
is
sayad
ahmed
and
I
just
noticed
that
name
on
that
as
a
participant
is
andreanas.
Actually
I'm
the
agent
for
this
evening
meeting
and
I'm
nothing
else
to
add.
Everything
is
very
well
explained
and
said,
and
I
appreciate
if
we
can
get
that
application
approved
tonight,.
A
Very
good
thanks
and
thanks
very
much
and
welcome
okay,
so
committee
members,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
or
staff
and
none
so
I'll?
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
295
emerald
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
295
emerald
street?
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
do
we
have
any
members
or
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
295
emerald
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
and
I
see
none
so
I'll.
Now
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
blaine
and
seconded
by
greg
any
discussion,
and
I
see
none
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
physical
hands
and
that
is
unanimously
carried.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
Hey
thank
you
and
through
you,
mr
chair,
my
name
is
megan
robidu
and
I
am
the
planner
who's
been
processing.
This
application
for
permission
and
minor
variants
for
the
property
known
as
to
nina's
lane.
The
purpose
and
effect
of
the
application
is
to
permit
a
new
detached
dwelling
on
the
subject.
Property
next
slide.
I
I
There
are
four
existing
dwellings
on
the
subject:
property
addressed
as
2
3,
8
and
18
nina's
lane,
the
dwelling
known
as
eight
nina's
lane
has
recently
been
demolished,
while
three
and
18
remain
and
are
currently
subject
to
landlord
and
tenant
board
proceedings.
Disputing
ownership,
the
property
known
as
to
nina's
lane
is
proposed
to
be
converted
to
a
storage
building.
I
I
want
to
note
that,
while
the
city
is
well
aware
of
the
ongoing
proceedings
at
the
landlord
tenant
board
regarding
the
ownership
of
3
and
18
nina's
lane,
the
city
does
not
have
a
role
in
these
proceedings
as
it
is
a
private
dispute
between
private
parties,
and
so
this
application
has
been
reviewed
under
the
assumption
that
those
dwellings
known
as
3
and
18
nina's
lane
may
remain
indefinitely
next
slide.
Please,
the
property
is
designated
rural
and
environmental
protection
area
in
the
official
plan
and
is
zoned
limited
service,
residential
and
open
space
in
zoning
bylaw
3274..
I
I
The
existing
dwellings
on
the
subject
property
were
established
prior
to
zoning
bylaw
3274
coming
into
force
in
effect
and,
as
a
result,
are
legal,
non-conforming
and
legal
non-complying.
With
respect
to
several
provisions
of
the
lsr
zone,
permitted
residential
uses
in
the
lsr
zone
include
a
detached
single-family
dwelling
house
and
a
seasonal
dwelling
house.
I
Next
slide,
please,
in
addition
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
the
proposed
new
dwelling
house,
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
minor
variance
from
section
511c
of
zoning
bylaw
3274
lot
development
requirements
to
allow
the
lsr
zone
provisions
to
be
measured
from
the
lot
boundary
as
opposed
to
the
zone
boundary.
So
when
applied
in
this
way
as
requested,
the
proposal
would
meet
all
provisions
of
the
lsr
zone,
including
lot
coverage
and
setback
requirements.
A
Thanks
very
much
megan
and
just
for
a
correction.
I
think
there
were
three
pieces
of
letters
and
three
letters
in
support
of
a
correspondence
that
we
received
in
support
of
the
application
this
evening
that
came
in
the
addendum
today,
not
just
the
one
yeah
okay.
So
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
call
on
the
applicant
or
their
agent
to
identify
yourself
by
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
And
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
two
nina's
lane?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
I
do
see
one
in
the
gallery.
Connie
morrow.
If
you
could
please
state
your
full
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
Yes,
my
concern
with
the
building
of
the
new
house.
We,
I
do
live
at
18
nina's
lane
me
and
my
husband,
the
new
house
is,
and
the
three
nina's
lane
is
where
my
sister
lives
she's
with
me
now
here
too,
our
concern
is
this:
with
the
size
of
the
house,
whether
or
not
our
houses
need
to
be
removed,
are
they
going
to
be
forced
to
be
ripped
down?
I
think
megan
answered
that
question,
but
and
getting
to
the
houses.
K
K
We
we
own
our
house,
we
lease
the
land
for
mr
sutton
and
that's
our
concerns.
Like
we've,
been
there
our
whole
life,
it
was
our
to
live
to
forever
house
kind
of
thing,
and
our
concern
is
whether
or
not
the
houses
will
be
forced
with
this
new
construction
to
be
removed
or
tore
down
and
where
that
leaves
us.
K
L
Something
heather
hi,
my
name
is
heather
patterson.
I
live
at
three
nina's
lane.
My
concerns
are
very
much
the
same
as
we've.
I
myself
have
lived
in
the
home
that
I
own
down
there
for
almost
40
years.
It
was
to
be
my
forever
home
and
if
those
houses
have
to
be
torn
down,
my
concern
is
where
would
I
go?
I'm
on
a
pension?
I
can't
afford
the
price
of
the
apartments
and
housing
in
kingston
and
that's
a
major
concern
for
me.
A
Okay,
thanks
very
much
okay,
so
do
we
have
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
to
nina's
lane?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
application
for
to
nina's
lane.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom,
so
I
see
none
so
I'll
come
back
to
the
applicant
or
staff
or
yeah
to
address
some
of
these
comments.
So,
mr
sutton,
I
see
recognize
you.
M
M
M
mrs
patterson
had
only
resided
in
the
place
just
recently
with
her
husband,
bobby
patterson,
who
passed
away
not
too
long
ago,
and
these
are
seasonal
cottages
that
they
have
actually
squatted
in.
So
we
are
looking,
we've
been
in
a
four-year
landlord
tenant
board
issue.
They
have
decided
and
elected
to
try
to
claim
ownership
on
the
on
the
cottages
which-
and
we
have
no
concern
with
at
this
time,
but
the
land
is
ours.
I
Yes
through
you,
mr
chair,
so
as
I
mentioned,
the
those
ongoing
proceedings
of
the
landlord
and
tenant
board,
that's
not
something
that
the
city
has
a
has
a
role
in.
It
is
a
private
dispute
between
private
parties,
but
I
will
note
that
and
reiterate
that,
from
a
zoning
perspective
and
a
land
use
planning
perspective,
the
demolition
of
three
and
18
nina's
lane
would
not
be
required
in
order
to
accommodate
this
new
proposed
dwelling.
If
you
look
at
exhibit
h
of
the
staff
report,
it
does
illustrate
the.
I
So
that
exhibit
provides
a
sketch
of
the
proposed
dwelling
on
the
property
in
relation
to
these
other
existing
dwellings
and
illustrates
that
there's
no
overlap
there
and
that
there
is
sufficient
setback
provided
between
all
of
those
structures
to
allow
them
to
remain,
and
so,
from
the
city's
perspective.
We've
reviewed
this
application
under
the
the
assumption
that
there
is
a
possibility
that
those
dwellings
may
continue
to
remain
on
the
property.
A
I
Yes
through
you,
mr
chair,
so
the
access
to
of
the
property
from
the
private
laneway
known
as
nina's
lane
will
continue
to
the
property.
Perhaps
the
applicant
can
speak
to
the
existing
driveway
on
the
property
and
and
how
that
might
be
altered
through
the
through
the
proposal.
But
it
would
be
the
city's
position
that,
if
those
if
those
dwellings
are
to
remain
that
access
would
continue
to
be
provided
from
the
existing
driveway.
I
I'll
also
note
that
the
application
also
recently
went
underwent
a
holding
removal
as
well
submitted
by
the
owner,
and
the
purpose
of
that
was
to
enter
into
a
private
laneway
agreement
with
the
city
to
formal,
essentially
formalize,
the
existing
access
to
the
property
from
a
private
laneway
and
to
recognize
that
so
in
in
terms
of
the
issue
of
access.
That's
that's
worth
noting
as
well.
J
Yes,
I
do,
as
indicated
as
megan
has
indicated,
the
cottage
number
two
is
going
to
be
turned
into
a
storage
facility,
and
access
will
be
provided
to
that
cottage
and
through
that
access,
the
other
two
cottages
will
be
will
also
have
access.
Should
that
be
the
situation
that
continues
to
be
relevant.
A
A
A
N
E
I
Okay
through
you,
mr
chair,
this
is
an
application
for
consent
and
minor
variants
for
100
neighbor
street.
The
purpose
and
effect
of
the
application
is
to
sever
an
approximately
1800
square
meter
lot
in
the
south
side
of
the
subject:
property
with
approximately
34.9
meters
of
frontage
on
napier
streets.
Next
slide.
I
The
subject
property
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
napier
street
and
is
currently
home
to
the
kingston
lawn
bowling
club.
The
property
is
developed
with
a
central
one-story
building
with
large
lawns
on
either
side.
The
subject
property
is
located
adjacent
to
single,
detached
dwellings
in
all
directions.
I
I
Next,
under
the
new
zoning
by-law,
two
variances
are
required
for
the
retained
lands,
one
for
rear
setback
and
one
for
interior
setback
to
similarly
recognize
the
existing
configuration
on
the
retained
parcel,
as
those
variants
is
required
under
zoning
bylaw.
8499
next
slide,
please,
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
planning
act,
a
notice
of
statutory
public
meeting
was
provided
by
advertisement
in
the
form
of
sign,
a
sign
on
the
subject
property
14
days
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
I
Approval
of
this
application
will
result
in
the
creation
of
one
new
1800
square
meter
lot
with
approximately
34.9
meters
of
frontage
on
napier
street,
and
also
note
that
the
approval
of
these
applications
will
not
encumber
the
potential
for
consideration
of
any
future
land
use.
Changes
on
these
severed
or
retained
lots
through
a
separate
future
planning
act
process,
and
with
that
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thanks.
N
O
O
Just
one
thing
I
mean
megan's
done
a
very
comprehensive
overview
there.
Just
the
main
purpose
of
this
application
is
the
the
club
really
wants
to
stay
in
the
area
maintain
maintain
that
location
on
napier
street.
The
the
two
greens
has
just
become
a
bit
of
an
operational
financial
kind
of
liability
to
them
so
they're
just
looking
to
sever
it.
Just
to
reiterate
what
megan
has
said:
there's
no
change
to
the
proposed
uses
on
the
property,
or
we
remain
as
a
open
space
use.
O
O
The
club
is
not
looking
to
get
out
of
it.
They're
just
looking
to
defer
this
to
a
later
planning
act,
approval
stage
being
the
site
plan
control
agreement.
This
was
briefly
discussed
with
staff
and
it
was
agreed
upon
that
could
be
the
case.
So
I'm
just
not
sure
if
it's
just
slipped
in
here
by
kind
of
just
the
standard
template
or
what
the
situation
is.
N
P
Hi
there
I'm
actually
savas
angie
james,
his
husband.
We
both
live
together
at
315
wellington
avenue,
so
we're
backyard
neighbors
of
the
lawn
bowling
club
on
the
west
side
yeah
and
we
they're
they're
great
neighbors,
so
we're
we'd
like
them
to
stay
too,
but
we
realize
the
situation
that
they're
in
oh
and
then
thanks
to
megan
for
sending
me
a
link
when
there
were
technical
difficulties
too,
but
I
have
a
few.
This
is
a
new
process
to
us.
P
P
P
We
don't
know
what
the
potential
buyer
is
going
to
do
with
the
property
and
the
other
thing
just
the
feedback
on
there
was
a
public
notice
sent
out,
but
there
was
no
date
for
feedback
on
there.
There
was
just
a
blank,
it
said
by
4
30
on
blank,
and
there
was
no
concept
sketch,
so
the
neighbors
in
the
area
didn't
really
know
what
to
expect.
N
N
Q
Q
So
I
have
a
couple
concerns
about
this,
so
the
first
one
is.
I
understand
that
this
is
a
proposed
potential.
Recreational
use.
This
is
not
a
confirmed
use,
though
the
variances
that
have
been
asked
to
be
changed.
I
wouldn't
really
come
a
minor
variance.
I'd
call
them
quite
a
significant
variance.
Some
are
being
decreased
by
300
like
three
times
so,
for
example,
the
rear
variance,
I
think,
was
from
12
meters
to
three
meters.
Q
So
that
would
mean
that
I'm
understand
like
to
me.
That
seems
like,
like
not
really
a
minor
variance
against
the
back
of
our
yard.
I
also
have
a
question
about
how
megan
specifically
said
that
this
does
not.
If
these
variances
are
allowed,
it
would
not
restrict
a
new
owner
who
changes
the
use
to
a
different
use
to
keep
those
variances.
Q
So
I
think
a
very
clear
path
of
events
would
be
an
individual
would
be
if
these
experiences
are
agreed
to
an
individual
would
purchase
that
with
this
sort
of
friendly
idea
of
building
a
tennis
court
and
four
parking
lots
which
I
don't
think
anyone
would
be
against,
and
then
they
will
have
these
big
variances.
They
will
change
to
a
different
zoning
and
then
they
will
build
something
that
will
essentially
be
right
next
to
our
backyard
and
our
neighbor's
backyard
and
all
of
the
neighbors
that
run
on
earl
street's
backyards.
Q
Q
Q
I
think
it's
very
unfair
that
it's
being
called
a
minor
variance.
I
think
this
is
a
major
very
and
I
think
that
anyone
on
this
call
either
on
the
committee
or
listening
in
the
community
who
thinks
this
is
going
to
stay.
A
green
space
has
got
a
lot
of
unicorns
and
rainbows
in
their
world,
because
this
is
just,
I
think,
very
unlikely,
and
you
know
what
I
would
personally
love
if
this
was
a
tennis
court
and
a
parking
lot
for
the
tennis
court.
R
Yeah
thanks
so
much
for
having
me.
I
appreciate
your
guys
time
and
the
committee's
time
on
this.
You
know
it's
it's
a
bit
confusing
for
us
to
to
look
at
this
and
and
see
this
plan
that's
been
put
forward.
It
does
seem
a
little
bit
like
a
like
in
a
bit
of
an
arbitrary
green
space.
Sort
of
situation
has
been
cooked
up
in
order
to
kind
of
push
this
along
through
the
city
processes.
You
know
it's
a
very
particular
plan
that
they
put
forward.
R
You
know,
I
wonder
if
there
is
a
buyer,
you
know
or
some
sort
of
potential
individual
that
that's
proposed
this.
There
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
secrecy
surrounding
this,
and
and
and
and
that's
that's
a
bit
concerning
so
I
I
think
that
you
know
in
terms
of
proposing
what
I
would
call
these
major
variances
to
the
outline
of
the
property
we
would.
We
would
not
be
in
favor
of
those
that's
that's
all.
We
have
to
say
for
now.
H
N
O
O
The
variant
is
only
rec
when
you
go
through
a
planning
application,
you
look
to
recognize
existing
situations
which
don't
comply
so
that
ray
yard
is
only
applying
to
the
clubhouse.
Now,
obviously,
it
doesn't
meet
the
rear
yard
and
it's
three
meters
from
the
existing
property
line,
so
that
that's
the
only
reason
for
that
variance
that
three
meters
will
not
apply
to
any
buildings
on
the
suburb
lot.
O
There's
no
buildings
proposed
on
the
severed
lot,
which
is
why
you
know
a
concept's
not
been
put
forward
showing
a
building
and
nothing
showing
a
yeah
that
that
three
meters
is
not
required
for
the
severed
lot.
Those
are
the
main
concerns
I
heard
and
megan's
got
anything
else
to
add.
Please
go
ahead.
I
Through
you,
mr
vice
chair
yeah,
so
I'll
just
reiterate,
mr
adam's
point
is
correct
in
in
noting
that
the
relief
that's
required
for
rearguard
setback
on
the
retained
lands,
where
the
existing
kingston
lawn
bowling
clubhouse
is,
is
to
recognize
the
existing
distance
from
that
rear
building
wall
to
the
rear
lot
line
on
the
retained
land.
So
there
would
be
no
change
there
from
how
it
exists
today,
and
relief
is
not
sought
for
any
setbacks
on
the
severed
land.
I
So
if,
when,
when
a
development
proposal
comes
forward
in
the
future
for
those
lands,
they
would
be
required
to
meet
all
applicable
setbacks
for
that
severed
parcel
in.
In
terms
of
you
know,
some
questions
and
concerns
that
were
raised
around
the
potential
for
residential
or
commercial
uses
to
be
established
on
that
parcel
in
the
future,
and
I
want
to
clarify
that
the
parcel
is
both
designated
and
zoned
for
open
space
uses
in
the
official
plan
and
in
the
zoning,
bylaw
and
so
residential
uses.
I
Commercial
retail
uses
are
not
permitted
on
that
property
as
it
exists
today.
If
someone
were
to
want
to
contemplate
those
types
of
uses
on
the
property
in
the
future,
they
would
have
to
make
applications
for
likely
an
official
plan
amendment
and
a
zoning
by-law
amendment,
which
would
be
a
separate
planning
act,
a
very
public
process
through
which
those
applications
would
be
reviewed
on
their
own
merits.
I
But
that's
not
something
that
is
is
proposed
through
this
application.
This
application
would
would
facilitate
the
severance
of
the
property
to
be
used
for
any
uses
that
are
permitted
as
a
right
on
the
property
today.
So
I
hope
that
provides
some
clarity
there.
Please,
let
me
know
if
I,
if
I
haven't
addressed
any
portion
of
of
those
questions
and
comments.
N
O
I
To
you,
mr
vice
chair.
Yes,
that
was
what
I
had
raised
my
hand
again
to
address,
and
I
would
agree
with
with
mr
adams
comment
that
this
was
previously
discussed
and
reviewed
with
heritage
services
staff,
and
it
was
determined
that
the
requirement
for
archaeological
assessment
of
the
property
could
be
deferred
to
a
site
plan.
Future
cycling,
control
application,
and
so,
as
a
result
of
that,
we
would.
We
would
agree
that
those
conditions
of
approval
for
the
consent
and
minor
variance
could
be
removed
from
the
recommended
conditions.
S
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
with
respect
to
a
little
bit
about
what
the
member
of
the
public
had
to
say.
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
live
in
this
in
in
the
area
and
it's
it's
very
nice
and
neat
and
beautiful
to
see
that
property
as
it
is
right
now,
and
I
really
appreciate
it
as
it
is
right
now
and
that's
the
only
comment
that
I
wanted
to
add.
Okay,.
N
B
O
N
N
A
E
T
T
Next
slide,
please
so
the
two
variances
that's
been
requested
are
the
interior
side
width
and
the
rear
side
width.
So
the
first
one
that
requirement
is
91
meters
and
the
proposing
4.3
and
the
variance
requested
is
4.8
meters,
so
the
rear
yard
setback
requirement
is
15.2,
the
propose
is
5.2
and
the
total
variance
requested
is
10.
or
10
meters.
Even
so,
it's
important
to
note
with
this
property.
It
is
a
c3-15
zoning
and
it's
not
subject
to
2022-62
the
new
zoning
by
law.
L
T
T
Property
is
on
the
west
side
of
sydney.
Road
just
north
of
princess
street,
on
the
east
side
is
cataract.
Race.
Cemetery
next
slide,
please
so
on
the
bottom
of
the
picture.
Right
here
is
sydenham
road
kind
of
looking
to
the
west
going
to
the
north
of
us,
so
the
in
blue,
the
accessory
building,
is
placed
next
slide.
T
The
requested
variances
maintain
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
the
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
7626.
The
proposed
the
proposal
is
desirable
and
appropriate
for
the
development
or
use
of
land
building
or
structure,
and
the
requested
variance
is
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection,
45
1
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
Approval
of
the
application
will
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
one-story
accessory
building
within
the
rear
yard
of
the
property.
A
R
A
And
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
991
sydnum
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
do
we
have
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
991
sydenham
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
991
sydenham
road.
A
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
The
larger
building
at
the
back
of
the
property
is
a
two-story
coach
house
style
structure
and
the
smaller
green
building
on
the
bottom
of
the
site
plan
is
a
single
story
garage.
Currently,
the
yellow
areas
on
the
site
plan
are
showing
the
two
proposed
parking
spaces.
The
larger
space
is
accessible
and
it
includes
the
required
aisle.
Alongside
of
it.
The
smaller
space
is
a
standard
parking
space
size
from
bylaw
8499.
E
It
was
not
possible
to
accommodate
all
four
parking
spaces
on
this
site,
while
maintaining
conformance
with
other
zoning
provisions
and
while
providing
emergency
service
access
to
the
rear
building.
Just
because
of
the
way
the
existing
buildings
are
placed
in
the
lots
and
the
restrictions
from
those
buildings
and
there's
also
a
private
easement
that
serves
the
property
to
the
south
and
that
easement
runs
along
the
driveway
and
no
parking
spaces
can
be
proposed
within
the
easement
next
slide.
E
Please
so
a
sign
was
posted
on
the
property
notice
was
mailed
and
a
courtesy
ad
appeared
in
the
wig
standard.
Since
the
finalization
of
this
presentation,
we
have
received
seven
public
comments.
They
were
all
included
in
the
addendum
for
tonight's
meeting.
The
comments
were
generally
in
support
of
the
application.
E
A
U
U
A
D
E
N
Yeah
it's
about
those
two
five-minute
parking
zones.
I
think
in
some
of
the
feedback
from
from
the
letters
they
mentioned,
maybe
trying
to
have
more
a
few
more
added
to
to
help
alleviate
the
the
parking
situation
for
drop-off.
I'm
assuming
that's,
not
something
we
can
address
here.
There
would
have
to
be
a
request
to
the
city.
Probably
I
assume
it's
not
a
condition
we
could
add.
Would
it
just
out
of
curiosity.
C
I
can
jump
in
here
so
a
3u
chair.
That
is
not
something
we
can
add
tonight
to
its
decision.
That
is
a
matter
for
transportation
services
to
consider
through
any
right-of-way
changes
they
would
make
to
the
parking
arrangement
in
the
area.
This
area
is
already
heavily
regulated
and,
as
lindsey
has
noted,
there
is
the
five-minute
drop-off
spot
located
on
the
west
side
of
the
street,
where
all
of
the
available
street
parking
is
signed
for
this
area
and
that
can
accommodate
approximately
two
vehicles.
There
is
also
additional
street
parking
available
up.
C
The
entire
west
side
should
spots
be
available
for
parents
or
persons
or
workers
in
order
to
be
able
to
park
in
this
general
area.
It
is
part
of
the
commuter
parking
permit
area,
so
persons
who
commute
into
the
city
can
park
through
the
residential
neighborhood
with
the
appropriate
pass
if
they
work
in
the
general
vicinity.
This
is
also
steps
from
this
one
of
the
city's
busiest
bus
stations
at
albert
and
princess
street.
C
It
does
have
some
of
the
highest
volumes
in
the
city,
and
the
bus
station
on
the
north
east
side
is
currently
under
renovation.
With
the
new
10
story,
building,
that's
going
up
there,
it's
going
to
be
incorporated
into
there
and
with
the
renovations
to
4-8
for
albert
street,
which
is
the
princess
for
united
church.
That's
also
getting
an
upgraded
and
enhanced
bus.
C
What
do
you
call
those
things?
Bus
stop
with
shelters
associated
with
it,
so
there
is
a
variety
of
transportation
options
available
to
the
site
in
the
central
portion
of
the
city.
One
last
thing
to
note
is
that
in
some
of
the
reports
there
were,
there
was
a
lot
of
support
voice
for
this
application,
with
some
caveats
that
were
requesting
that
albert
street
be
one-way,
directed
southbound
through
this
area.
C
Transportation
services
has
not
raised
any
concern
with
the
ability
of
the
transportation
network
in
this
area
to
absorb
any
additional
traffic
that
may
result
from
this,
but
there
is
a
transportation
study
going
on
for
this
portion
of
princess
street
between
division
street
all
the
way,
through
kind
of
northwest
to
the
concession
bath
road
intersection.
Looking
at
the
available
transportation
options
for
it.
So
through
that
work
it
may
assess
different
transportation
needs
for
the
neighborhood.
A
I
actually
do
have
one
and
it's
kind
of
along
the
same
lines,
and
maybe
james
perhaps
you
can
address
this.
It's
in
reference
specifically
to
the
letter
we
received
in
the
addendum
from
dan
gale,
and
it
does
deal
with
parking
and
I'll
press.
My
comments
by
saying
he's
quite
clear
that
he's
in
very
much
in
support
of
the
of
the
application
and
they
just
love
the
facility
in
the
area
he
he
speaks
more
from
a
safety
perspective.
A
That's
at
least
how
I
interpreted
the
letter
and-
and
I
guess
his
inference
was
to
our
suggestion-
was
perhaps
to
make
that
section
of
albert
street
a
one-way,
really,
I
think
more
to
address
safety,
and
I
know
that's
beyond
the
purview
of
the
committee,
but
I
don't
want
him
to
think
that
his
comments
to
the
committee
have
gone.
You
know
unheard.
A
C
C
A
Perfect,
that's
great
thanks
very
much
james,
okay,
good
any
other
questions
from
committee
members.
Okay,
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
442
albert
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
the
chair
recognizes
mary
purcell.
V
The
concern
really
is
with
the
parking
on
albert
street,
and
it's
not
just
the
daycare,
although
the
daycare
use
is
intensifying
quite
substantially
so
there's
about
an
85
increase
in
the
number
of
staff
and
over
60
percent
increase
in
the
number
of
day
care
spaces
right
now.
People
who
are
picking
up
and
dropping
off
the
children
are
parking
in
the
five-minute
zone
facing
the
wrong
way
on
the
street.
V
V
V
There
were
11
cars
parked
there
with
no
permit,
and
there
were
two
cars
parked
at
expired
meters.
So,
as
I
say,
it's
very
rare
that
by
law
enforcement
comes
around
in
the
winter
time.
I've
lived
here
for
20
odd
years.
This
is
the
first
year
that
the
city
did
not
clear
any
snow
on
the
west
side
of
the
street.
V
Normally
both
sides
are
cleared
once
or
twice
a
winter,
and
people
were
parking
in
front
of
the
church
and
with
the
snow
parking
in
front
of
the
church,
people
were
stopped
at
the
stoplight
and
it
was
out
absolutely
impossible
to
travel
southbound
on
albert
street.
So
I
contacted
parking
several
times.
Not
much
happened.
I
contacted
the
counselor
in
the
area.
Counselor
neil
enforcement
was
stepped
up
and,
and
it
has
been
a
lot
a
lot
better,
but
that
was
a
very
dangerous
situation.
V
The
church
property
is
intensifying
and
it's
going
to
intensify
even
further.
As
far
as
I
can
tell,
there
are
no
visitor
spots
for
the
church
and
there's
no
parking
in
front
of
the
church
on
princess
street,
because
there's
a
bike
lane
and
there's
no
parking
in
front
of
the
church,
because
the
light's
there
and
impedes
traffic,
so
people
are
parking
in
the
accessible
space
in
front
of
the
church,
they're
still
parking
in
front
of
the
church.
They
are
parking
across
the
sidewalk
opposite
of
the
church.
V
There's
a
lot
of
construction
in
the
area.
So
there's
a
lot
of
traffic.
There
are
a
lot
more
students
now
living
on
princess
street,
as
I'm
sure
you're
aware
so,
there's
a
lot
more
traffic
on
albert
street.
That
includes
scooters,
longboards,
motorized
non-motorized,
so
there's
just
a
lot
of
activity
on
the
street
and
there
are
a
lot
of
dangerous
situations.
V
I'm
sure
there
are
lots
of
things
that
can
be
done,
probably
making
it
one
way.
Southbound
for
the
block
would
be
the
most
helpful
in
the
meantime
enforcing
the
permits,
I
think,
would
would
be
helpful
as
well.
So
that's
that's
really
all
I
have
to
say
and
hope
that
we
can
resolve
the
situation
so
that
the
daycare
can
expand
and
the
parking
and
traffic
flow
doesn't
get
any
worse
on
elder
street.
A
Great
thanks
very
much
for
your
comments.
Do
we
have
any
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
442
albert
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
do
we
have
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
442
albert
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I
see
none.
So
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
staff
or
the
applicant
to
address
the
the
comments
that
we've
just
heard
and
james.
C
Yuko
can
sweep
this
one
for
me
if
I
miss
anything,
but
I
just
wanted
to
jump
in
here.
My
apologies,
mary
purcell,
I
did
say
I
think,
dale
egan
rather
than
dan
gayle.
I
think
I
played
a
little
bit
of
letter
jumble
in
my
brain.
I
apologize
for
that,
so
I
will
take
dan
gale's
letter
and
pour
that
on
the
transportation
service.
C
The
the
the
concerns
of
the
letter
are
are
noted,
as
well
as
the
interface
with
everything
that's
happening
on
the
street.
A
lot
of
the
matters
that
were
raised
are
enforcement
matters
that
don't
necessarily
affect
land
use,
but
it's
it's
not.
It's
not
lost
on
staff
that
this
is
a
central
portion
of
the
city
and
there
are
nearby
areas
that
are
intensifying
with
the
development
that's
happening
on
princess
streets
to
this
daycare,
that's
happening
in
the
central
portion.
These
are
all
services
that
are
also
needed
to
support
a
growing
community.
U
U
The
in
terms
of
what
the
daycare
is
able
to
do
to
mitigate
against
any
parking
demand,
any
parking
need.
They
are
providing
an
additional
four
bicycle
parking
spaces
on
the
site
through
site,
plane,
control,
to
encourage
alternative
modes
of
transportation
for
their
staff,
they're,
also
working
with
their
staff
to
look
at
all
other
other
options
as
well
for
for
for
permit
parking
in
the
area,
but
also
to
encourage
active
transportation
and
use
of
public
transit,
so
they'll
be
working
with
their
staff
and
with
the
city
to
obtain
bus
passes
and
so
forth.
U
Anything
that
can
help
reduce
the
number
of
vehicles
generated
on
the
street
here
and,
finally,
the
from
a
timing
perspective.
I
think
that
was
sort
of
implicit
in
terms
of
the
transportation
study
there.
The
the
daycare
is
seeking
this
expansion
to
fill
an
immediate
need.
There
is
a
high
demand
for
the
types
of
spaces.
They're
providing
special
needs
spaces
infant
spaces
as
well
and
they're
looking
to
have
those
spaces
available.
U
A
N
I
want
to
mention
that
I
think
it's
great
that,
like
we
need
a
lot
of
daycare
spaces
and
and
all
the
good
things
you
hear
about
this.
This
daycare
and
I
like
how
that
it's
accessible
for
walking
a
lot
of
people
mention
that
they
can.
They
can
walk
there
without
having
to
drive
and
they
like
having
it
nearby.
N
A
Great
thanks
for
that,
and
you
know
I
have
to
echo
the
same
comments,
which
was
why
I
was
pushing
to
have
mr
gayle's
letter.
I
thought
it
was
thoughtfully
written
and
he
had
a
lot
of
really
good
ideas
in
there
that
I
would
not
have
otherwise
thought
about
and
to
have
it
all
prefaced
by
the
whole
concept
that
he
really
appreciates
and
approves
of.
The
of
the
daycare
I
thought
was
really
good
adds
a
lot
of
value
to
it.
Greg
you
have
a
comment.
A
S
Through
you,
mr
chair,
in
no
way
am
I
excusing
breaking
the
law
when
it
comes
to
parking,
but
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
comment
that
I
do
recognize
the
safety
issues
and
with
respect
to
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
the
member
from
the
public
brought
forward.
Thank
you
for
that,
but
people
I
just
wanted
to
state
that
people
do
what
people
do
when
they
park
and
they're
dropping
off
their
children
and
in
busy
streets
and
and
parking
the
opposite
direction,
and
all
these
sorts
of
things.
S
A
A
E
E
E
E
E
The
proposal
complies
with
all
other
provisions
of
the
zoning
bylaw,
including
maximum
density
required
bicycle
parking
and
required
amenity
space.
I'll
also
note
that
the
exact
same
variances
are
requested
under
the
new
zoning
bylaw
2262.,
as
the
site-specific
zone
that
applies
to
this
property
is
being
carried
forward
into
the
new
zoning
bylaw.
Exactly,
as
is
next
slide
please.
E
E
E
E
148
bicycle
parking
spaces
are
proposed.
That's
one
per
unit
and
they're
also
located
in
the
basement
here,
and
the
new
gym
is
proposed
in
the
bottom
left-hand
corner
of
this.
Drawing
next
slide,
please
so
a
sign
was
posted
on
the
property
notice
was
mailed
out
and
a
courtesy
ad
appeared
in
the
wig
standard.
E
A
A
N
So
my
question
is
so
you
mentioned
so
the
apartment
two
new
dwellings
will
be
done
at
the
lower
level.
Is
that
where
the
the
lighter
colored
brick
is
and
the
windows
are
right
at
the
sidewalk
and
you
mentioned
a
basement,
is
there
a
level
lower
than
that?
Or
is
that
technically
the
basement
where
those
windows
and
is
just
curious
to
because
in
our
documents
we
don't?
Really,
we
didn't
have
the
the
same
picture
that
you
just
displayed.
N
W
No
through
you,
mr
chair,
it's
actually
an
internal
space
to
the
site
that
looks
out
to
the
courtyard.
It
is
a
little
bit
of
amenity
space
and
a
little
bit
of
commercial
space
that
they
have
not
been
able
to
rent
so
moving
that
amenity
space
below
that
front
lobby
to
utilize
an
area
that's
not
being
used
to
make
up
for
it.
But
it's
these
units
aren't
facing
the
street
they're
fully
inside
that
courtyard.
W
W
W
A
Within
the
building,
very
good
thanks
for
that,
okay
committee
members,
any
other
questions
and
blaine
do
you
want
to
try
your
mic
again?
No
you're,
good,
okay,
all
right,
okay,
we're
good
all
right!
So
I'll
now
open
up
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
here
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
655
princess
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
we
have
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
655
princess
street.
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
my
third
and
final
call
is
anybody
with
us
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
655
princess
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
I
see
none
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
greg
and
seconded
by
paul
any
discussion
on
this.
A
So
all
in
favor
raise
your
physical
hands
and
that's
unanimously
carried
all
right
thanks
very
much
so
moving
on
in
our
agenda.
We
have
no
notices
of
motion.
Item
number,
10,
there's
other
business.
There
is
no
other
business
item.
Number
11
was
a
piece
of
correspondence
we
received
from
roland
billings,
dated
june
2nd
2022
regarding
32nd
37
ellerbeck
street.
A
C
Chair,
I
can
speak
to
this
correspondence
that
we
received
so
this
I
don't
know
how
many
members
of
committee
were
around
at
this
point,
but
in
2015
this
was
an
application
for
actually
blaine
raised
his
hand.
So
maybe
he
has
some
corporate
knowledge
on
this,
as
well
as
he's
been
around
for
this
approval.
So
this
was
a
a
consent
that
was
submitted
to
the
city
for
approval
that
was
zone
compliant,
so
it
didn't
have
any
minor
variances
that
went
along
with
it.
C
So
when
it
was
severed,
they
also
created
a
right-of-way
down
the
property
lines
to
service
both
39
and
37
ellerbeck,
not
because
there
was
an
existing
dwelling
there,
so
that
would
give
access
to
the
rear
yard
for
additional
parking
spaces,
because
there
is
no
ability
to
park
in
the
front
yard,
and
at
that
point,
under
our
zoning
bylaws,
there
was
no
ability
to
have
front
yard
parking.
It
was
approved
in
2015.
C
The
consent
was
finalized,
so
the
lot
was
created,
so
it
was
just
subject
to
the
applicable.
A
zone
category
which
you
know
averages
at
the
front
yard,
has
an
average
building
depth,
has
an
almost
11
meter
tall
height
with
the
right
of
way
that
was
there.
It
created
the
narrow
passage
way
to
get
back
to
the
rear.
You
know,
since
then,
there
have
been
several
changes
to
our
zoning
bylaws,
so
we
have
had
the
introduction
of
second
residential
units
for
buildings
as
of
right,
so
in
2015,
when
the
application
was
severed.
C
If
you
look
at
the
a
zone
provisions,
you
have
to
have
370
square
meters
per
unit
on
a
lot,
so
one
unit
on
a
lock
can
have
370
square
meters
a
lot
but
the
second
unit,
which
is
because
he
does
for
two
family
dwellings.
We
need
an
additional
370,
so
you're,
looking
at
like
700
and
bad
map
at
the
end
of
the
day,
20
or
740.
C
C
We
also
have
introduced
the
ability
to
have
front
yard
parking
with
specific
considerations
for
areas
across
the
city.
That
was
done
in
2019
when
we
updated
driveways
and
parking
fast
forward
to
today
we
have
a
building
permit
in
it's
a
single
detailed
strolling
with
a
second
residential
unit
with
rear
yard
parking,
so
residents
in
the
neighborhood
raised
concerns
about
the
building
that
was
there
in
terms
of
zone
compliance
and
fit
within
the
area.
C
And
when
you
look
at
the
images
of
the
building,
it
does
look
like
a
departure
in
terms
of
height
for
that
residential
neighborhood,
because,
as
we
find
across
the
city,
certain
zone
regulations
are
in
place,
but
buildings,
historic
or
not
have
not
been
built
up
to
them.
Think
I
think
red
and
dale,
which
is
you
know,
have
predominantly
been
one
one
and
a
half
story
buildings,
maybe
because
they
have
larger
lots
of
bungalows
on
them,
but
really
the
zoning
there
allows
for
a
larger
two-story
building
because
it
allows
for
a
height
of
10.7
meters.
C
The
same
thing
applies
in
this
portion
of
the
city,
so
when
this
property
came
in
for
development
and
the
building
started
to
go
up,
residents
raised
concern
with
zone
compliance
and
our
director
in
planning,
as
well
as
the
director
of
building,
so
the
chief
building
official
have
been
out
to
the
site
to
speak
with
the
residents
and
work
is
ongoing
on
that
site.
So
we're
actively
looking
at
it
for
zone
compliance
and
compliance
with
regulations
under
the
building
code.
A
A
It
seemed
that
I
mean
this
was
an
application
that
had
gone
through
the
committee
of
adjustment
under
and
it
was
approved
based
on
the
terms
and
conditions
and
recommendations
at
that
time,
but
then
it
appears
I
mean
there
are
at
least
two
inferences
in
this
letter
that
suggests
that
the
applicant
may
have
on
purpose
or
not
or
accidentally
changed
some
of
the
conditions
just
because
and
now,
they're
kind
of
being.
You
know
being
shouted
out
on
that.
A
C
That,
through
the
through
your
chair,
so
when
the
application
went
through,
committee
of
adjustment
did
have
a
wider
right-of-way
noted
on
the
plans,
and
that
was
revised
through
the
through
the
the
finalization
of
the
reference
plan
for
that
project,
noting
that
2.7
meters
was
sufficient
at
the
time
for
the
width
of
a
vehicle
to
traverse
through
there.
So
there
was
that
change
in
staff.
I
was
not
around
at
the
time,
but
staff
who
reviewed
the
application
deemed
it
to
be
satisfactory
for
the
purposes
of
access.
Okay,
through
the
final
consent
work
process.
C
This
is
an
interesting
application.
We
have
as
staff,
not
supported
something
similar
to
this.
In
modern
terms,
I
believe
if
anybody
remembers
the
application
for
macdonald,
I
do
was
one
something
mac
to
know.
This
has
echoes
of
that
again,
so
you
know
what
often
constitutes
good
land
who's
playing
at
one
time.
Might
you
know
not
further
down
the
road
either
given
change
in
policy
change
and
direction,
change
and
approach,
or
change
and
understanding
so
can't
say
we
would
or
would
not
support
an
application
here
like
this
today.
C
But
you
know
our
zone
regulations
are
being
updated
with
the
new
zoning
bylaw,
which
will
look
at
things
like
front
yard
setback.
We
are
scrapping
average
building
depth
and
going
with
a
static
building
depth
so
and
that
will
actually
apply
from
their
required
front
yard
setback.
So
it
prevents
people
from
moving
a
building
further
back
into
their
front
yard,
to
have
it
project
further
into
the
rear
yard,
because
that
18
meter
static,
front
yard
setback
will
apply
from
the
front.
C
What's
the
word,
I
want
to
look
for
here
and
we'll
have
a
bit
more
regularity
to
them
than
some
of
the
zone,
provisions
that
we
see
today,
but
the
concerns
have
been
noted
by
staff
from
mr
billings
and
we
are
going
through
the
normal
processes
that
we
undertake
when
reviewing
building
plans,
as
well
as
reviewing
when
someone
actually
builds
on
the
property.
How
inconformance
it
is
with
the
zoning
bylaw.
C
A
Okay,
good
yeah.
I'm
glad
to
hear
that.
I
I
think
it's
important
that
I
mean
you
hate
to
think
about
the
whistleblowers
and
people
that
complain
and
such
but
from
a
you
know
being
on
the
committee.
We
look
at
these
things
very
seriously
and
when
you
know
when
we,
you
know
come
up
with
a
decision
based
on
the
information
before
us-
and
you
know,
emotion
is
made
in
its
past
and
then
somebody
for
whatever
reason,
changes,
terms
and
conditions
down
the
road.
A
D
B
A
C
A
S
A
That's
a
good
question:
there's
not
a
lot,
we
can
do
as
a
committee,
so
I
would
hate
to
to
lead
them.
Give
them
a
false
hope
that
by
speaking
to
us
that
we
can
be
an
agent
for
change,
I
don't
really
think
we
can.
I
think
my
concern
is
just
that,
as
I've
just
said,
when
something
happens
after
the
fact
that
I
I
certainly
would
like
to
see
some,
you
know
a
resolution
to
it
anyway.
A
Okay,
yes,
okay,
good
any
other
comments
at
all
from
or
questions
from
committee.
Okay,
thanks
for
that-
and
you
know,
if
I
don't
know
if
mr
or
roland
and
susan
billings
are
with
us,
but
thanks
very
much
for
the
letter
and
bringing
it
to
our
attention
that
that's
I.
I
do
appreciate
that.
As
I
know,
the
committee
does
as
well.
Okay.
So
now
the
date
of
the
next
meeting
is
for
july.
18Th
at
5
30
p.m.
Everybody's
gonna!