►
Description
Committee of Adjustment meeting from July 20, 2020. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/2D100Np
A
All
right
we're
now
live
mr.
chair
thanks
very
much
okay
good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
on
your
screen.
You'll
see
members
of
our
committee
of
adjustment.
Now
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
this
evening
and
even
though
you
won't
see
them,
you
will
hear
them
chime
in
from
time
to
time.
A
Our
secretary
treasurer
is
Lindsey
stamen
and
we
also
have
clerks
James,
Thompson
and
Derek
O'shea,
who
are
hosting
the
meeting
and
running
the
zoom
platform
from
behind
the
scenes
for
sure
they're
authorized
to
interrupt
the
meeting
as
the
need
arises
and
we're
sure
to
hear
their
voices
from
time
to
time.
The
agenda
and
schedules
for
this
meeting
have
been
posted
on
on
the
city's
website
and,
if
you
don't
have
those
documents
and
you'd
like
to
follow
along,
you
might
want
to
access
them.
A
Now
we
have
four
agenda
items
this
evening
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
the
format
that
we'll
be
using
to
navigate
through
each
of
the
applications
I'm
going
to
start
by
introducing
an
application
and
then
I'll
give
each
applicant
or
their
agent
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further.
If
you
are
the
applicant
or
the
agent-
and
you
have
nothing
further
to
add,
then
just
simply
say
so.
Next
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
at
that
time.
A
I'll
invite
members
of
the
public
to
raise
their
virtual
hand
and
zoom
if
they
have
any
questions
or
comments
in
respect
of
the
application.
Now,
if
you
do
have
a
question
or
if
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer.
It's
during
this
public
portion
of
the
meeting
that
we
will
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments,
and
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
A
Will
the
questions
and
comments
be
addressed
by
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff,
to
be
sure
I'm
going
to
call
three
times
for
public
comments
before
I
close?
The
public
portion
of
the
meeting
next
I'll
invite
the
applicant
and
staff
to
address
the
public
comments,
after
which
I'll
turn
to
the
committee
and
I'll
ask
them
to
make
a
motion
so
that
we
can
deliberate
on
the
application
at
that
time.
A
If
you're
the
applicant
you're
free
to
leave
the
meeting,
then
we
just
rinse
and
we
repeat,
I'll,
be
using
the
same
format
for
each
application
this
evening.
So
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell.
Now,
if
you
have
any
personal
interest
in
any
part,
their
application
and
you'd
like
to
receive
written
notice
of
tonight's
decision,
then
please
send
an
email
with
your
name
and
address
to
our
secretary
treasurer
Lindsey
stamen.
Her
email
address
is
LS
th
a.m.
a
NN
at
city
of
kingston
dot
CA.
A
A
A
First
of
all,
can
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
so
moved
by
Paul
and
seconded
by
us
for
a
second
or
so
seconded
by
Vincent.
Any
discussion
on
that
I
see
none.
So
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimously
carried
again
all
right.
Are
there
any
disclosures
of
pecuniary
interest
this
evening?
A
Shake
your
head?
No,
if
there
are
none,
none
I
see
none
okay
and
there
are
no
delegations
and
there
are
no
requests
for
deferral
and
there
are
no
returning
deferred
items.
So
the
first
piece
of
new
business
we
have
this
evening
is
the
appointment
of
a
secretary
treasurer
and
the
deputy
secretary
treasurer.
So
can
I
ask
a
committee
member
to
move
this
by
reading
the
motion,
as
in
the
agenda.
B
A
A
D
E
So
this
is
the
minor
variants:
application,
D,
1301
or
2024
194
Johnson
Street.
The
purpose,
in
effect
of
the
application,
is
to
permit
additions
to
connect
the
existing
dwelling
to
an
enlarged
garage
while
adjusting
the
parking
requirements
to
permits
to
front
yard
parking
spaces
with
one
parking
space
within
the
enlarged
garage.
The
application
seeks
to
convert
the
existing
single
detached
structure
and
existing
detached
garage
into
a
rooming
house
with
seven
habitation
units
next
slide.
Please
sorry,
can
we
have
the
slide
up?
That
has
the
variance
table.
That's
yeah!
Thank
you.
E
E
Parking
spaces
are
required
to
be
enclosed
or
behind
the
midpoint
of
the
structure,
and
the
applicant
has
requested
one
enclosed
space
in
two
parking
spaces
within
the
front
yard.
Variant.
Six
relates
to
design
standards
in
the
appropriate
maneuvering
areas
for
for
vehicles
on
the
property
and
the
the
applicant
has
requested
permission
for
2/10
and
Parton
parking
spaces,
and
the
last
variance
relates
to
the
provision
of
accessible
parking.
The
bylaw
requires
one
type,
a
space
and
the
applicant
has
requested
to
provide
zero
accessible
parking
spaces
next
slide.
Please.
E
This
location
map
demonstrates
where
194
Johnson
Street
is
between
Sydenham
Street
and
baguette.
Street
opposite
hotel-dieu
hospital
next
slide.
Please,
the
site
plan
shows
where
the
proposed
additions
would
be
situated
on
the
property.
The
yellowish
area
is
the
proposed
common
room,
which
would
be
the
connection
between
the
existing
detached
structure
and
the
existing
detached
garage.
It
also
illustrates
the
location
and
dimensions
of
the
proposed
rear
addition
to
the
garage
and
also
front
addition
to
the
garage.
The
green
area
demonstrates
the
courtyard
that
would
be
formed
after
the
common
room
addition.
E
E
This
shows
the
floor
plans
as
the
ground
floor,
a
couple
of
habitation
units
on
the
ground
floor,
the
existing
structure,
a
common
kitchen,
the
common
room
addition
and
then
the
transition
of
the
rear,
sorry
transition
of
the
detached
garage
into
a
habitation
and
also
still
retaining
that
garage
function.
Next
slide,
please.
E
These
are
the
the
second
floor
plans
again
habitation
units
within
the
existing
detached
structure
and
showing
the
proposed
partial
second
floor
edition
above
the
enlarged
garage
next
slide,
elevations
that
have
been
submitted
with
the
application.
These
demonstrate.
The
proposed
development
is
focused
towards
the
rear
of
the
property
windows
have
been
arranged
so
that
views
are
directed
into
the
rail
yard
or
out
towards
Johnson,
Street
and
away
from
abutting
residential
properties
and
next
slide.
Please
recommendation
the
requested
variances
maintain
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
Official
Plan
and
zoning
bylaw,
eight
four,
nine
nine.
E
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure
requested.
Variances
are
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
of
subsection
45,
one
of
the
Planning
Act,
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
additions.
E
Approval
of
this
application
will
enable
additions
to
be
made
to
the
existing
dwelling
detached
garage
to
transition.
The
structure
from
the
single
detached
dwelling
to
a
rooming
house
with
seven
habitation
units
that
respects
the
heritage
designated
structures.
The
proposed
development
is
not
anticipated
to
have
any
adverse
impacts
on
the
abutting
residential
properties
or
streetscape
back
to
you
sure,
okay,.
A
F
D
A
B
I'm
a
couple
of
questions
that
mr.
chair,
maybe
the
first
one,
is
just
staff
if
I
may
I
understand
from
the
report
that
that
this
was
going
for
a
heritage,
application
and
I
think
the
meeting
was
held
a
few
days
ago
and
we
were
just
wondering
if
there's
any
update
on
the
July
15th
heritage
meeting.
Thank
you.
E
B
Good
another
question
mr.
chair:
if
I
may,
this
is
medium
yeah
agent,
the
current
use
of
the
property,
is
it
currently
being
used
of
some
rooming
house
already
my
understanding,
it's
been
listed
in
under
Queens
for
some
time
for
basically
rooms
for
rent
I'm,
just
wondering
if
that's
the
current
use.
D
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
so
the
current
owners
are
my
understand,
the
body
as
the
intention
to
use
it
as
kind
of
a
co-op
for
seniors.
Essentially,
so
they
would.
You
know
the
two
partners
would
live
there
in
the
kind
of
the
larger
unit
and
then
they
would
have
the
additional
rooms
available
as
kind
of
a
seniors
housing
co-op
under
the
umbrella
of
a
boarding
house,
essentially
so
the
living
in
common
together.
E
Through
year,
mr.
chair
I
have
not
received
any
any
comments
from
abutting,
abutting
neighbors
or
any
any
members
of
the
public
on
this
particular
application.
As
as
noted
in
the
report,
the
the
windows
do
to
focus
the
views
into
the
rear
yards
and
there
is
quite
a
quite
a
fair
amount
of
existing
vegetation,
including
some
fairly
large
trees
in
the
rear
yard
that
are
proposed
to
remain
and
are
indicated
and
the
the
tree
preservation
plan
to
to
be
retained.
So
I
think
that
that
would
would
help
resolve
any
potential
concerns
of
overlooked
or
privacy
etc.
E
A
E
Three,
mr.
chair,
I
can't
speak
to
how
how
common
it
is
there.
There
wasn't
a
great
deal
of,
I
suppose,
awareness
of
recent
rooming
house
applications
being
made
to
the
city.
The
definition
in
the
zoning
bylaw
is
perhaps
not
as
robust
as
we
would
hope,
but
I
understand.
The
interpretation
that
has
been
made
in
the
city
in
the
past
is
that
it's
not
a
dwelling
unit
unless
it
has
a
full
kitchen.
Okay,.
D
E
So
a
condition
has
been
included
in
the
proposed
condition
has
been
included,
is
as
part
of
exhibit
a
that.
The
kitchen
nets
that
are
labeled
on
the
floor
plans
are
to
not
have
essentially
a
stove
or
an
oven
to
remain
as
kind
of
an
accessory
cooking
type
facility.
You
know
a
small
fridge,
maybe
a
hot
plate
or
a
microwave
for
kind
of
convenience
food,
but
that
the
main
cooking
facilities
would
be
contained
within
the
common
kitchen,
and
then
that
does
meet
the
definition
of
rooming
house.
Okay,.
E
Yes,
I
understand
the
previous
interpretations
that
have
been
made
in
in
the
city
have
have
required.
The
removal
of
full
stoves
ranges,
those
types
of
things
that
that
are
on
their
own.
You
know
220
volt
circuit,
but
if
there's
a
you
know
a
small
sink
or
a
small
convenience
fridge
or
a
microwave,
or
something
like
that
that
that
level
of
cooking
facilities
has
been
permitted
in
the
past
and
it's
it's
thought
to
be
similar
to
you
know:
people
have
a
rec
room
or
something
in
the
in
the
basement.
E
B
E
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
the
the
requested
variance
for
the
accessible
parking
has
been
I.
Suppose
it's
kind
of
twofold
that
the
the
site
plan
demonstrates
the
the
site
is
quite
tight
with
respect
to
space
available
for
parking.
The
location
of
the
two
existing
heritage
structures
means
that
it's
not
possible
to
get
a
driveway
into
the
rear
yard
to
provide
parking
in
the
rear
yard
and
the
driveway
width
as
it
as
it
is
today
at
six
meters
and
as
shown
on
on
the
plans,
is
the
maximum
width
for
residential
driveway
and
in
the
municipality.
E
A
No
I
see
none
okay,
so
we'll
I'll
open
up
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
ask
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
here
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
194,
Johnson,
Street
and
I,
don't
see
any
attendees
in
the
public
galley,
but
there
might
be
somebody
else
in
attendance.
I'll
just
call
one
more
time.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
here
that
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
194
Johnson
Street?
A
A
C
E
E
The
key
map
shows
the
location
of
the
property
within
a
developed
plan
of
subdivision.
Similar
single
detached
structures
are
developed
on
on
either
side
and
opposite
the
subject.
Lands
and
subject
lands
back
onto
a
water
course
in
stormwater
management.
Pond.
That's
part
of
Highgate
Highgate,
Creek,
sorry,
which
is
a
water
course
that
is
regulated
by
Cataraqui
region,
Conservation
Authority
for
flooding
and
erosion
hazards.
Next
slide,
please,
the
site
plan
shows
the
existing
dwelling
garage
on
on
the
property
and
in
green
show
us
that
proposed
deck
and
stairs.
E
And
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
it
shows
in
a
little
greater
detail.
So
the
proposed
deck
does
conform
with
the
rear
yard
setback
requirement
of
4
meters,
but
the
proposed
stairs
encroaches
within
that
requirement
to
a
distance
of
two
point:
seven
nine
meters,
so
that
is
the
first
variance
and
the
second
variance
is
an
increase
in
law
coverage.
Given
the
size
of
the
deck
which
is
proposed.
Sorry,
the
law
coverage
is
proposed
to
increase
from
the
permitted
35
percent
up
to
thirty
eight
point,
five
percent
and
the
next
slide
has
the
recommendation.
E
The
requested
variances
maintain
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
City
of
Kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
70
626.
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure,
and
the
requested
variances
are
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
development
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection
45
one
at
the
Planning
Act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
E
A
A
B
E
3
mr.
chair
CR
CA
did
review
this
proposal.
They
have
commented
the
the
applicant
revised
their
submission
in
order
to
conform
with
comments
coming
in
from
CR
CA,
specifically,
the
the
deck
was
was
pulled
back
towards
the
house
by
a
fairly
minor
amount.
The
the
applicant
is
aware
that
CR
CA
does
require
a
permit
for
this
proposed
development,
but
CR
CA
has
issued
no
no
concerns
with
the
proposal
and
is
of
the
mindset
that
the
they'll
be
able
to
issue
the
the
necessary
permit
under
their
regulation
under
the
conservation
authorities.
Act
thank.
A
You
great
any
further
questions
from
committee
members,
so
I
don't
see
any
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
or
any
members
of
the
public
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
one
two,
one:
nine
Catherine
Crescent,
please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
again
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
in
the
public
gallery
so
I'll
call
one
last
time.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
here
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1219
Catherine
Crescent?
A
A
C
H
D
H
Got
the
next
slide,
this
report
provides
a
recommendation
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
regarding
an
application
for
minor
variance
for
the
property
located
at
153
mowett
Avenue.
The
variance
is
requested
to
reduce
the
minimum
rear
yard
requirement
in
the
one
family
dwelling
a
5
zone
in
zoning
bylaw
number
8
499
the
applicant
proposes
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
6
meters
to
3
meters
to
permit
the
construction
of
a
22-point
2
square
meter.
H
Addition
under
the
raised
deck
in
the
rear
yard
the
owner
applicant,
proposes
to
convert
an
area
under
the
raised
deck
to
provide
additional
living
space
to
the
second
residential
unit
in
the
basement.
The
22.2
square
meter
area
is
currently
a
patio
which
provides
private
amenity
space
for
the
basement
unit.
The
addition
will
provide
an
entrance
or
vestibule
and
additional
living
space
in
the
living
room.
The
addition
and
it's
windows
will
provide
extra
natural
light
into
the
basement
below
you
will
see.
H
H
The
property
is
close
to
the
corner
of
mowett
Avenue
and
Baden
Street.
Some
of
you
may
have
recognized
this.
This
used
to
be
part
of
21
Baden
Street,
which
received
a
consent
application
in
order
to
sever
153
mowett
Avenue
mowett
Avenue
previously
was
given
at
the
time
of
consent,
a
minor
variants
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
in
order
to
keep
in
line
with
the
existing
buildings
along
the
street
frontage.
H
Next
slide
there
please,
okay,
so
the
site
plan
shows
the
existing
two-story
frame
dwelling
and
the
proposed
addition,
which
is
at
the
rear.
We
have
asked
that
the
plan
show
a
an
additional
private
amenity
area
for
the
basement
unit,
which
the
applicant
has
that
is
the
cross
hatch
section
that
you
see
on
the
bottom,
which
looks
like
a
stone,
so
that
would
be
the
outdoor
private
amenity
space
for
the
basement
unit.
The
upper
unit
will
still
maintain
the
upper
portion
of
the
deck
for
the
private
amenity
area.
H
H
H
H
H
Show
it
too
well
here
on
the
North
North
elevation,
however,
that
little
portion
I
do
see.
That's
actually
the
doorway
going
into
the
second
unit
there
next
slide,
so
the
requested
variance
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
City
of
Kingston
Official
Plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
eight,
four,
nine
nine.
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure,
and
the
requested
variance
is
minor
in
nature.
H
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection
45,
one
of
Planning
Act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
Approval
of
this
application
will
permit
the
construction
of
a
twenty
two
point:
two
square
meter
addition
at
the
rear,
the
dwelling,
the
addition
will
provide
additional
living
space
and
vestibule
to
the
basement
unit.
A
A
F
Have
a
couple
of
comments:
I'm
just
note
that
the
footprint
stays
the
same,
we're
building
just
underneath
the
existing
deck,
and
the
reason
for
this
is
that
the
the
owners
parents
are
coming
to
live
in
there
at
the
house.
They
come
from
the
East
Coast
and
the
mother
tikki,
there's
an
incredible
gardener.
F
It's
along
the
south
side
of
the
building
received
a
new
Terrace
Gardens,
that's
gonna,
be
that
that's
gonna
be
quite
explained
and
some
Gardens
for
her
and
that,
with
the
her
space
to
work
on
and
and
as
I
mentioned
before,
you
know
the
without
those
additional
wind
doesn't
old
addition.
It
made
the
living
room
very
dark
because
of
the
grade
there,
so
this
allows
lighting
in
the
living
room.
Space
allows
the
mother
to
have
a
great
place
to
garden
and
I.
Think
the
rest
of
it
is
per
10
min
later.
A
Have
you
put
the
motion
up
on
the
screen?
Please
and
the
recommendation
is
that
minor
variance
application
file,
number
D,
13
0
2
0
2024,
the
property
located
at
153
mowett
Avenue
to
reduce
the
minimum
rear
yard
requirement
to
construct
a
22.2
square
meter
addition
under
arrays
deck,
which
projects
into
the
rear
yard
be
approved
and
that
approval
of
the
application
be
subject
to
the
conditions
attached
as
Exhibit
A
to
report
number
Co,
a
2004
1
so
can
I.
Have
a
member
of
the
committee
move,
move
that
please.
A
A
C
For
you,
mr.
chair,
this
application
is
for
a
consent
and
minor
variants
at
4:38,
Aragon
Road.
Please
note
that
these
are
two
separate
applications:
d-10
2
0,
3,
2020
and
D
13
0,
2
2020.
A
separate
boat
can
be
made
for
each
file.
Number
Tim
Fisher
is
the
planner
on
the
file
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
him.
Ok,.
H
H
The
only
reason
why
it's
actually
coming
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
is
because
it
it's
a
technical
variance
in
this
case,
so
they're,
looking
at
variance
to
reduce
the
road
frontage
of
the
retained
a
lot.
The
reason
why
the
variance
is
required
before
we
get
into
it
is
because
the
retained
lot
is
required
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of
the
bylaw,
so
that
includes
road
frontage,
lot
area,
that
type
of
thing,
so
we
have
to
recognize
the
existing
lot
frontage.
So
it
is
technical
nature
here
next
slide.
H
So
this
is
a
report
to
recommend
approval
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
regarding
applications
for
Mayer
variance
and
consent
for
the
purpose
of
a
lot
addition
to
an
abutting
agricultural,
a
lot
from
the
property
located
along
Aragon
Road.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
sever
a
8.9
hectare,
parcel
of
undeveloped
land
with
no
road
frontage
and
have
it
merge
on
title
with
a
landlocked
parcel
to
the
north.
The
retain
1.2
hectare
parcel
of
undeveloped
land
will
maintain
the
existing
11
metres
of
road
frontage
on
Aragon
road.
H
I
also
would
like
to
add
here
that
a
right-of-way
is
also
requested
over
a
portion
of
the
retained
lot
in
order
to
provide
access
to
the
landlocked
parcel
or
the
new
newly
merged
parcel
of
land,
and
also
to
the
abutting
land
at
its
residential
development,
which
currently
has
access
over
to
that
property
or
over
that
property.
So
the
the
the
right-of-way
will
actually
give
it
legal
access
next
slide.
H
So
again,
as
I
previously
stated,
we're
actually
legalizing
that
driveway
to
make
it
into
a
shared
driveway,
so
that
362
will
actually
have
legal
access
over
348
in
order
to
access
their
property.
The
other
right-of-way
well
actually
we'll
see
in
the
draft.
Our
plan
will
continue
up
over
the
retain
portion
and
to
provide
access
onto
the
Severn
next
slide.
H
H
H
So
our
recommendation,
there
were
the
requested
minor
variants
and
are
consistent
with
the
general
purpose
and
general
intent
of
both
the
City
of
Kingston
Fisher
plan
is
only
bylaw.
76
26,
the
minor
variance,
meets
all
four
tests
under
the
Planning
Act
and
as
such,
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions,
and
I
would
actually
like
to
point
out
that
a
hydrogeological
study
is
required.
An
archeological.
H
A
F
G
Yes
I
if
I
may,
I
would
like
to
add
first
of
all
like
to
thank
mr.
Fisher
for
his
overview,
as
well
as
that
of
committee.
For
you
know,
working
through
these
trying
times
and
and
going
to
the
lengths
of
holding
applications
and
considering
applications
on
zoom'.
It's
very
much
appreciated
for
moving
applications
forward,
as
mentioned
through
the
overview
for
mr.
Fisher.
This
is
considered
to
be
an
application
of
Locke
consolidation
and
primarily
that
consolidation
revolves
around
the
high-quality
agricultural
lands,
farm
lands
that
are
located
on
this
property
Oh,
as
mentioned
by
mr.
G
The
city
would
be
then
assured
that
the
protection
of
agricultural
land
is
that
and
carried
forward
into
the
future
to
prevent
the
loss
of
prime
quality
agricultural
lands.
So
for
that
reason,
I
think
this
application
is
a
very
good
and
in
conformity
with
respect
to
the
to
the
city
of
Kingston's
official
plan,
now
I'm
I
think
mr.
Fisher
for
referencing
the
conditions
contained
or
proposed
within
for
your
consideration
as
it
relates
to
the
two
minor
variant,
go
to
the
minor
variants
and
to
the
severance
or
consent
for
a
lot
addition
application.
G
G
The
third
paragraph
of
condition.
Five
before
you
tonight
on
exhibit
a
page
96.
It
states.
If
the
applicant
wishes
to
not
establish
a
well
and
a
hydrogeology
assessment
on
the
retained
parcel.
The
applicant
may
wish
to
apply
for
a
holding
provision
on
that
law
until
the
successful
development
of
that
parcel.
G
Essentially,
until
that
development
may
proceed
in
the
construction
of
a
single-family
dwelling,
I
would
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
clarify
through
staff,
because
it's
my
understanding
that
the
parcel
no
municipally
or
identified
municipal
as350
for
which
is
landlocked
through
this
application,
with
no
frontage
aside
from
a
right-of-way
easement
in
my
reading
of
76
26,
it
would
not
be
permitted
to
be
developed
with
the
construction
of
a
single-family
dwelling.
So
if
that
is
true
or
if
I
am
correct,
I
don't
see
the
necessity
for
applying
for
a
holding
symbol
on
the
retained
portion
of
3:54.
A
H
Yes,
sir
you're
there,
mr.
chair
mr.
sands,
is
correct
that
it
has
to
be
considered
a
developable
lot.
The
newly
merged
lot,
because
it
does
not
have
frontage
on
an
open
and
maintained
Road,
is
not
considered
a
developable
a
lot.
However,
we
are
looking
at
it
as
it
has
the
potential
later
on
down
the
road
so
like
if
it
was
to
obtain
some
sort
of
frontage.
H
At
that
time,
we
may
it
will
become
developable,
so
it'd
be
beneficial
if
they're
good
after
establishing
a
well
on
the
severed,
Arashi
I
should
say
on
the
retained
portion
that
they
they
may
want
to
entertain,
establishing
a
well
on
on
the
newly
merged
lot
as
well
too.
At
the
same
time,
however,
we
did
put
a
rider
in
there
saying
that
if
they
wanted
to
go
through
a
rezoning
process
and
put
a
holding
symbol
on
it,
they
can
hold
off
on
it
and
then
at
a
later
date,
go
ahead
and
put
that
on
yeah.
H
F
F
A
G
I
may
continue
chair,
appreciate,
appreciate
that
I,
just
as
we
are
discussing
this
point
and
before
I
leave
that
you
can
acknowledge
and
understand
that
this
is
again
highly
valuable
farmland.
Agricultural
land
that's
been
tiled
drained.
There
is
absolutely
no
desire
to
construct
a
dwelling
on
350
for
Aragon
in
a
landlocked
form,
nor
do
I
see
any
frontage
in
the
future.
G
The
the
only
opportunity,
I
suppose,
would
be
extending
unity
Road
from
Battersea
the
intersection
of
unity
and
Battersea
to
the
east,
again
I
I.
Suppose
it's
a
potential
I,
just
there's
a
there's,
a
desire
for
that
for
the
applicant
or
the
owner
to
not
require
to
come
rezone
or
instill
a
hydro
or
a
well
and/or
a
holding
symbol
on
the
retained
parcel
as
you
as
you
can
imagine.
Okay,
thanks.
G
And
I,
just
the
only
other
comment
I
would
like
to
make
is
just
clarification
from
staff
and/or
members
of
the
committee
that
condition
six,
which
speaks
to
hydrogeology
illogical
assessment.
My
apologies
that
the
archeological
assessment
is
is
scoped
in
nature,
so
that
it
is
applicable
to
the
area
of
the
subject
parcel
subject
to
development
I'm.
Just
the
retained
and
severed
parcel
and
in
my
world
is
somewhat
confusing
when
we're
talking
about
this
application,
just
just
based
on
merged
a
lot
shifting,
lot
lines,
etc.
G
So
I'd
just
like
to
clarify
that
recognizing
its
proximity
to
a
unesco
world
heritage
site
with
the
Rideau
Canal
the
opportunity
or
the
requirement
for
that
that
it's
limited
to
again,
not
the
entire
50
acre
parcel,
rather
the
one
hectare
site
of
the
development
and
not
of
even
the
1.2
hectare
site
that
incorporates
the
access
on
the
eastern
portion
of
the
property.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
B
I'm
a
little
more
confused
now
with
the
with
the
diagrams
and
with
the
new
I
guess
some
residential
addresses,
but
I
just
wanted
to
confirm.
Maybe
maybe
staff
could
put
up
the
site
find
document
again
and
I
would
reference
my
question
to
that
yeah.
So
my
understanding
is
the
small
square.
If
you
will
under
where
it
says
a
lot
concession
that
is
the
proposed
severance
of
1.2
3
Hector's
and
my
understanding
is
that
that
will
have
access
through
a
proposed
easements
to
Aragon,
Road
and
I'm,
not
sure
about
the
retained
lot
to
the
north.
H
H
Pshape
is
what
you'd
be
looking
at
as
the
retained
the
cross-hatching
area,
which
is
the
eight
point,
seven
seven
hectare
area
that
is
considered
the
severed
portion,
which
is
actually
going
to
be
merged
to
the
northern
portion
here,
where
it
actually
says,
George,
Patrick
Kerry,
and
it
says
a
one
zoning
just
to
the
north
of
it
there.
Okay,
so
that
northern
portion
or
the
portion
to
be
merged
will
have
a
right-of-way
or
an
easement
over
the
retained.
H
A
Good
any
other
questions
from
committee
members,
yeah
I,
do
have
a
question
here.
One
dealt
more
with
the
road
widening,
so
there
was
some
discussion
about
the
survey
or
having
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
road
would
have
to
be
widened.
Am
I
to
understand
that
when
the
road
is
widened,
will
the
city
be
be
assuming
any
responsibility
for
that.
H
Through
mr.
chair
yeah,
it's
standard
for
any
applications
for
consent
to
ask
for
a
road
widening,
so
we
we
typically
ask
the
surveyor
to
verify
our
whit's
for
our
roadways
and
if
the
allowance
isn't
there
already,
we
just
ask
them.
Can
you
please
provide
X
amount
of
meters
of
additional
property
in
order
to
provide
that
road?
Finding,
so
we're
not
too
sure
if
it
is
required
or
not,
and
then
what
would
happen
is
they
would
deed
that
portion
on
to
the
city
and
then
the
city
would
then
assume
that
portion
of
the
road
widening
so.
A
H
I
I
also
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
I
did
review
the
fee
bylaw
so
currently
to
go
through
a
rezoning
process
to
place
the
H
symbol
on
the
property
you're,
looking
at
almost
four
thousand
dollars
in
an
application
fee:
okay
and
the
feet
currently
to
remove
that
H
symbol
is
about
$2,300,
so
in
the
future.
That
fee
actually
could
go
up.
Okay,.
A
Sure,
okay,
I,
just
I,
was
just
interested
because
III
was
thinking
that
you
know
to
take
that
out.
It
might
even
be
better
for
the
applicant
to
go
ahead
with
the
you
know:
drilling
a
well
and
a
hydrogen
I.
Think
the
wells
in
that
area
are
not
very
deep
anyway
and
just
add
the
hydro
G
at
the
same
time,
and
it
would
just
be
an
incremental
cost,
as
opposed
to
a
doubling
of
it.
But
anyway,
that's
that's!
A
No
I,
don't
see
any
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
or
any
members
of
the
public
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
Aragon
Road
3,
4,
8,
Aragon,
Road,
I,
don't
see
anybody
in
the
public
gallery
so
I'll.
Ask
one
more
time.
Is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
three
for
a
tarragon
Road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I,
don't
see
any
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
and
Derek
and
I.
A
First,
please:
ok,
moved
by
Paul
and
seconded
by
Jordan.
Any
discussion
on
that
raise
your
hands
all
right.
So
any
discussion,
none
okay!
So
if
all
in
favor
raise
your
hands-
and
that
would
be
carried-
and
the
second
motion-
that
the
minor
variance
application
file-
number
D
1302
to
2020-
to
reduce
the
minimum
lot
frontage
requirement
to
recognize
the
retain
lot
through
consent,
application
file,
number
d-10,
Oh,
23
2020
be
approved
and
that
the
approval
of
minor
variance
application
file,
number
D
1320
to
2020,
be
subject
to
the
conditions
attached.
A
A
A
I,
don't
believe
we
have
any
motions.
There
are
no
notices
of
emotion,
motions,
there's,
no
other
business,
anything
for
other
business
at
all,
I,
don't
see
any
delegated
authority
applications
in
progress.
Have
you
had
a
chance
to
review
those?
You
have
any
questions
or
comments.
Okay,
so
we'll
move
on.
There
was
no
correspondence
and
it
looks
like
there
will
be
another
meeting
scheduled
for
August,
the
24th
2020,
so
just
FYI,
and
now
we're
just
looking
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
moved
by
Paul
and
seconded
by
Somnath.