►
Description
Committee of Adjustment meeting from December 12, 2022. For more details visit https://bit.ly/3UVfZiq
A
If
you
do
have
a
cell
phone
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
double
check
it
now,
to
be
sure
the
ringer
is
turned
off
and
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
with
us
this
evening.
If
you
have
an
interest
in
any
particular
application,
please
be
sure
to
fill
your
name
and
address
on
the
sign
up
sheets
that
are
located
at
the
back
of
the
room.
A
So
I'll
Now
read
the
following
notice:
the
notice
of
decision
for
the
applications
we
review
this
evening
will
only
be
forwarded
to
those
who
have
either
presented
a
written
request
for
the
decision
or
to
those
who
have
recorded
their
names
on
the
sign
up
sheets
on
the
back
at
the
back
of
the
room.
Furthermore,
a
formal
request
is
necessary
to
be
advised
of
a
possible
Ontario
land
tribunal
hearing
on
these
matters
and
in
order
to
be
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
to
the
Ontario
land
tribunal,
which
is
otherwise
known
as
the
Olt.
A
If
you
are
following
remotely
and
you'd
like
to
be
notified
of
any
decision
or
any
appeals
that
may
result,
please
send
an
email
to
our
secretary
treasurer
Lindsey
stamen.
Her
email
address
is
l-s-t-h-a-m-a-n-n
at
city
of
Kingston
dot.
Ca
thanks,
please
be
sure
to
put
your
full
name
and
address
and
the
file
number
of
the
application
so
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
now
the
five
part
format
that
I'm
going
to
be
using
as
we
navigate
through
each
application
this
evening
in
the
first
part,
I'm
going
to
introduce
the
application.
A
So
if
you
are
the
applicant
or
the
agent
I'm
just
going
to
ask
you
to
come
up
here
to
my
right
to
the
speakers
area
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
state
your
name
and
your
address
for
our
record
and
then
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further
to
your
application.
In
Step
number,
two
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff,
and
then
in
the
third
step,
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
A
Now,
members
who
of
the
public
can
either
line
up
at
the
speaker's
Center
to
the
right
or
you
can
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
when
I
recognize
you
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
your
questions
or
make
your
comments.
Now
each
speaker
will
be
allotted
five
minutes
and
I'll
be
sure
to
give
a
warning
at
the
4
minute.
Mark
it'll
be
helpful
if
speakers
do
not
repeat
the
same
issues.
A
So
if
somebody
has
already
covered
a
point
that
you
want
to
raise,
then
please
don't
feel
compelled
to
repeat
that.
That's
just
not
very
helpful.
So
during
this
portion
as
well,
don't
expect
an
immediate
response,
because
it's
at
this
point
we'll
physically
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments,
and
it's
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
B
Good
evening
through
you,
Mr
chair,
I,
can't
confirm
we
do
indeed
have
Quorum
with
no
member
members.
Absent
I
also
can
confirm.
We
do
have
members
of
Staff
in
on
the
zoom
and
in
person,
and
we
also
have
members
of
the
public
present
in
the
chamber,
and
we
have
one
attendee
in
the
public
viewing
gallery
on
Zoom.
How
could
you
turn
back
over
to
you
great.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
so
I'll
Now
call
the
meeting
to
order
at
5,
33
pm
and
I'll.
Refer
you
to
the
agenda
committee
members.
Now
there
were
two
addendums
one
went
out
on
Friday
and
one
this
afternoon
around
one
o'clock,
everybody
received
those
addendums
okay,
so
I'm
asking
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
with
the
addendums
moved
by
Paul
and
seconded
by
blame.
A
A
A
I
see
none
so
that
we'll
move
on.
There
are
no
delegations,
we
have
no
requests
for
deferral
and
we
have
no
returning
deferred
items
so
we're
on
to
our
first
piece
of
new
business,
which
is
number
8A,
which
is
an
application
for
minor
variants.
Lindsay
can
I.
Please
have
you
read
this
into
the
record.
C
D
E
E
The
property
is
located
at
the
corner
of
Princess
Street
and
mcdonell
Street
in
the
Williamsville
neighborhood
and
contains
a
commercial
Plaza.
The
proponent
is
daf
brewing,
who
has
operated
the
existing
patio
for
about
three
years,
and
the
existing
temporary
patio
is
not
subject
to
front
yard
setbacks.
E
E
The
proposed
deck
is
to
front
onto
Princess
Street,
taking
place
of
the
existing
temporary
patio.
As
you
can
see
here,
and
here
you
can
see
conceptual
sketches
of
the
proposed
deck.
The
Planters
are
to
be
integrated
into
the
deck
and
are
to
be
retained
within
that
one
meter
or
outside
excuse
me
of
that
one
meter.
Setback
from
the
sidewalk,
the
deck
is
to
be
slightly
raised
off
the
ground
to
be
at
consistent
height
with
the
existing
concrete
porch.
E
All
public
notification
requirements
were
met.
Regarding
this
application,
we
have
received
no
public
correspondence
with
regards
to
the
application.
It
is
detailed
in
the
report
presented
to
the
committee.
The
application
meets
the
four
tests
to
approve
a
minor
variance,
as
outlined
in
the
planning
act.
It
is
staff's
recommendation
to
approve
the
application
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
E
A
A
A
A
G
A
A
Do
we
have
anybody
with
us
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
for
768
Princess
Street,
please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
one
person.
Oh
there's
your
people,
okay
and
third
and
final
call.
Is
anybody
here
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
768
princess
I,
see
none
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion?
So
it's
moved
by
Paul
and
seconded
by
Jordan.
A
A
C
H
Hello,
thank
you
Mr,
chair
through
you,
we
have
a
application
or
actually
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
reduce
the
minimum
interior
setback
to
construct
a
partial,
Second
Story
at
the
Southwest
corner
of
the
existing
one
and
a
half
story.
Dwelling
next
slide
here,
please,
the
subject:
property
is
designated
as
residential
in
the
official
plan.
Zone
Heritage
District
3,
which
is
old
Sydenham
in
zoning,
bylaw
number
2022-62
and
the
property
is
developed
with
a
one
and
a
half
story.
Single-Family
dwelling
and
a
shed.
H
H
H
So
the
requirement
is
1.2
meters
from
the
side
Lot
line
and
they
are
proposing
0.06
meters,
so
they
are
requiring
a
variance
for
1.14
meters.
So
the
view
that
you
do
see
there
is
actually
the
rear
lot
line.
However,
it
just
gives
you
a
good
idea
of
where
they're
they're
proposing
condition
next
slide.
H
H
H
And,
as
you
can
see
here,
the
roof
line
will
not
be
higher
than
the
existing
the
existing
building
itself,
so
it
would
not
be
visible
from
the
roads.
The
applicant.
It's
also
important
to
note
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
a
6.82
square
meter
vestibule
along
the
eastern
wall
of
the
dwelling.
However,
that
actually
complies
with
all
the
provisions
of
the
zoning
bylaw
next
slide.
H
Public
media
notification
was
provided
by
advertisement
in
the
forms
of
signs
posted
on
the
subject
site
10
days
prior
to
the
meeting.
In
addition,
notices
were
mailed
to
a
total
of
49
Property
Owners
within
60
meter,
radius
of
the
property
and
the
courtesy
courtesy
notice
was
placed
in
the
Kingston
wig
standard
next
slide,
so
the
requested
variance
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
Kingston
official
plan
and
zoning.
H
The
Proposal
is
desirable
and
appropriate
development
for
the
land.
Therefore,
the
proposal
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection,
45
1
of
the
planning
Act.
Approval
of
this
application
will
provide
additional
living
space
to
an
existing
single
detached
dwelling
through
the
construction
of
the
partial
Second
Story
Edition
for
future
owners.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
I'll
leave
it
in
your
hands.
A
B
A
A
That's
great
thanks
any
other
questions
from
committee
members
I
see
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening?
Who
would
like
to
speak
to
the
application
for
42
Wellington
Street?
Please
raise
your
hand
or
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom.
Okay,
there's
nobody
in
the
public.
Is
there
anybody
here
this
evening
wishing
to
speak
to
this
application?
None
okay,
so
everybody's
shaking
their
head?
A
A
C
C
C
So
here
we
have
the
key
map
and
should
have
the
neighborhood
contacts
map
pop
up
there
for
reference.
332
mcdonell
street
is
zoned
ur5
in
zoning
Biola
2022-62
next
slide,
please,
the
minimum
required
aggregate
interior
setback
in
the
bylaw
is
3.6
meters
and
the
applicant
has
requested
to
reduce
this
to
2.7
meters.
C
The
second
variance
is
to
increase
the
maximum
building
depth
from
18
meters
to
18.6
meters
next
slide.
Please
so
I've
included
these
renderings
to
provide
some
context.
It's
worth
noting
that
this
proposal
has
a
unique
front,
configuration
that
the
second
floor
projects
further
forward
than
the
ground
floor.
C
You
can
see
that
vest
on
the
top
two
renderings
here
and
basically
what
that
means
is
that
the
front
yard
setback
is
actually
measured
to
the
second
floor
wall
rather
than
the
foundation
wall,
as
we
would
typically
see,
and
also
the
required
parking
space
for
this
proposal
is
to
be
located
partially
underneath
the
second
floor
next
slide.
Please
so
here
I've
got
a
simplified
site
plan
just
to
illustrate
the
required
variances.
C
The
first
variance
is
shown
with
two
blue
lines:
that's
the
aggregate
interior
setback
calculated
by
adding
the
smallest
setback
on
the
North
side
to
the
smallest
setback
on
the
south
side.
In
this
case,
the
total
requested
aggregate
is
2.7
meters.
Each
side
yard
still
complies
with
the
individual
minimum,
which
is
0.6
meters,
and
it's
worth
noting
that
the
proposed
new
aggregate
interior
setback
will
provide
for
a
net
improvement
over
the
existing.
The
existing
aggregate
setback
is
only
2.3
meters
for
the
existing
house
shown
with
the
blue
footprint
there.
C
The
building
does
comply
with
the
minimum
aggregate
side,
yard
setback
and
I've
also
just
included
a
green
line
on
the
front
of
the
house
here
to
demonstrate
the
proposed
front
yard
setback
that
green
line
marks
the
second
floor
overhang
front
wall
next
slide,
please,
okay,
so
we
posted
a
sign
mailed
the
notice
and
a
courtesy
ad
was
in
the
newspaper.
We
did
receive
one
public
comment
on
this
file,
which
was
included
in
the
second
addendum
that
went
out
to
you
today.
C
A
A
J
A
A
There's
nobody
here
and
the
only
two
people
here
are
shaking
their
heads:
no
okay,
so
I'm
actually
going
to
come
back.
I
do
have
a
question
for
staff,
for
you
Lindsay
it's
about
the
archaeological
assessment.
Now
on
page
on
page
71
of
the
report,
recommendation
number
four
is
a
recommendation
for
an
archaeological
clearance.
However,
on
page
65
we
just
go
back
a
couple
Pages
here.
A
C
Those
are
two
separate
classifications,
so
a
property
can
be
designated
a
Heritage
under
the
Heritage
act
which
would
trigger
the
need,
for
example,
a
Heritage
permit
or
a
Heritage
impact
statement.
The
archaeological
requirements
comes
from
our
archaeological
master
plan
and
archaeological
mapping,
which
is
also
in
the
official
plan
and
that's
a
different
category
where
something
might
have
limited
potential
or
a
higher
potential
for
archeology
and
the
just.
The
requirement
for
an
archaeological
study
comes
from
that
mapping
layer
and
it's
not
tied
to
the
Heritage
mapping.
C
A
D
A
K
Thank
you
and
through
the
chair,
this
is
an
application
for
minor
variance
at
30
to
purpose
and
effect
of
this
application
is
to
construct
a
Revere
uncovered
duct
deck,
which
exceeds
the
maximum
surface
area
provision
for
decks
greater
than
1.2
meters
above
finish,
grade
next
slide.
Please,
foreign.
K
The
subject:
property
is
located
in
the
West
End
of
Kingston,
southeast
of
the
intersection
of
Westbrook
Road
and
creekford
Road,
and
is
located
on
Ottawa
Street,
just
east
of
Leyden
Avenue.
Next
slide.
Please,
a
variance
to
the
maximum
service
area
for
decks
with
a
height
greater
than
1.1.2
meters
is
required
to
facilitate
the
proposal.
The
variance
requested
is
for
an
additional
5.3
square
meters.
Next
slide,
please
shown
here,
is
the
site
plan,
drawing
which
is
included
in
exhibit
h
of
the
report.
K
The
site
plan
shows
the
proposed
rear
deck
and
exterior
stairs
it's
a
little
small,
but
it's
there
next
slide.
Please
shown
here
is
the
South
elevation
which
details
the
proposed
rear
deck
and
set
of
stairs,
so
that
would
be
facing
to
this
out
next
slide.
Please
here
are
the
West
and
East
elevations,
which
show
the
deck
and
stairs
from
the
side
lot
lines
next
slide.
Please,
and
finally,
here
is
the
floor
plan,
which
shows
the
proposed
deck
and
stairs
with
further
information
on
measurements.
Next
slide,
please
one
sign
was
posted
on
the
property.
K
47
notices
were
mailed
out
and
an
ad
was
placed
in
the
Kingston
standard.
No
comments
had
been
received
regarding
this
application.
Next
slide,
please
The
Proposal
meets
all
four
tests
under
the
planning
act
and
is
being
recommended
by
staff
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
In
exhibit
a
approval
of
this
application
will
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
rear,
uncovered
Deck,
with
an
area
of
35.3
square
meters
that
has
a
height
over
1.2
meters.
K
A
I
A
A
A
Any
discussion,
no
discussion
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
physical
hands
and
that
is
unanimously
carried.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right
on
to
item
number
nine
of
the
agenda.
We
have
no
emotions.
We
have
no
notices
and
motions,
there's
no
other
business.
The
correspondence
was
we
did
receive
today,
which
is
a
part
of
the
addendum
date
of
the
next
meeting,
is
Monday
January
16th.
So
now
we're
looking
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
moved
by
Greg
and
seconded
by
Blaine
any
discussion
so
yeah
Paul.
A
Thank
you
for
that
and
I
Echo,
that
with
staff
they've
just
been
an
absolute
dream
to
work
with
in
every
way,
both
on
the
planning
and
on
the
clerk
side.
So
thanks
for
making
it
a
great
transition
and
actually
a
nice
transition
back
to
people
time.
So
thanks
all
right.
So
all
in
favor
of
adjournment
raise
your
hands
and
that's
unanimously
carried
to
a
meeting
adjourned
at
603
PM
thanks
everybody
and
Merry
Christmas
or
happy
holidays.