►
Description
Committee of Adjustment from August 16, 2021. For the full meeting agenda, visit https://bit.ly/2UoSh4X.
A
Okay,
hello
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
on
your
screen.
You
will
see
members
of
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
behind
the
scenes
we
have
staff
members
that
you
will
hear
from
time
to
time.
Our
secretary
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsay
staman
and
our
clerk
is
elizabeth
fossett,
who
will
be
hosting
the
meeting
tonight.
A
A
A
C
C
We
also
have
joining
us
this
evening
from
staff,
james
barr
manager,
development
approvals,
lindsey
stamen,
planner
and
secretary
treasurer,
sarah
old
oldenburger,
a
planner
ashley,
anastasio
planning,
intern
shahida,
hawk
planning,
intern
and
julia
mccarty-jansman
is
joining
us
as
our
meeting
host
this
evening.
I'm
elizabeth
fawcett
committee
clerk
for
the
committee
of
adjustments.
We
currently
have
six
agents
and
applicants,
seven
agents
and
applicants
joining
us
on
the
call,
as
well
as
five
members
of
the
public
in
the
gallery
this
evening,
mr
vice
chair,
and
that,
with
that
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
A
A
A
A
A
E
F
No,
I'm
muted.
Can
you
hear
me
okay,
yep,
wonderful
good
evening
and
for
you,
mr
chair,
this
application
is
for
520
bagot
street.
It's
a
permission
and
minor
variance,
and
can
we
advance
to
the
next
slide?
Please,
the
purpose
and
effect
of
this
application
is
to
replace
the
existing
rear
mudroom
with
a
new
single
story,
rear
edition
and
add
a
new
set
of
steps
which
would
project
westward
from
the
proposed
edition.
So
the
existing
rear
mudroom
is
approximately
1.8
square
meters.
F
The
proposed
single-story
addition
would
be
approximately
8.2
square
meters,
and
the
proposed
set
of
steps
which
are
new
would
be
approximately
2.1
square
meters.
The
existing
dwelling
is
non-complying
status
and
requires
permission
to
expand
as
it
does
not
meet
the
current
side
guard
and
law
coverage
requirements
in
zoning.
Bylaw
number
8499
next
slide,
please,
in
addition
to
the
requested
permission,
this
proposal
also
necessitates
a
variance,
as
there
is
a
new
deficiency
for
landscape
open
space.
F
This
would
be
under
section
6.30,
minimum
percentage
of
landscape
open
space.
The
requirement
for
this
provision
is
30
of
the
total
lot
area
and
the
proposed
would
be
27.2
percent
of
the
total
lot
area,
necessitating
a
minor
variance
of
2.8
percent
of
the
total
lot
area.
Next
slide,
please,
the
subject:
property
is
located
at
520
baggett
street,
as
you
can
see
on
the
key
map
here,
as
indicated
from
the
black
lines.
This
is
near
the
intersection
of
raglan
road
and
bagot
street,
which
are
two
local
roads.
F
This
is
the
site
plan
that
was
submitted
by
the
applicant.
So
if
you
look
closely
here,
you
can
see
the
location
of
the
existing
edition
to
be
removed,
which
is
indicated
at
the
rear
of
the
property
on
the
north
side.
Here
it
has
a
jagged
white
line
and
there's
a
location
of
the
proposed
edition
in
the
cove
here
of
the
building.
F
I
wish
you
could
see
my
mouse
and
also
there's
some
steps
projecting
westford
from
the
proposed
edition,
so
the
existing
edition
would
be
removed
completely
and
there'd
be
a
new
edition
put
on
as
well
as
the
proposed
steps
next
slide.
Please
here
are
the
floor
plans
which
show
a
little
bit
more
clearly.
Please
note.
The
orientation
of
these
is
slightly
different,
just
for
ease
of
view.
So
on
the
left
here
we
have
the
location
of
the
proposed
shed
in
the
top.
F
So
if
you
look
on
the
top
left
side
of
the
screen,
you
can
see
where
the
shed
is
in
the
in
the
cutout
of
the
building
there,
and
so,
if
you
look
on
the
right
picture
here,
that's
where
the
new
one
story
edition
would
go
as
well
as
the
proposed
steps.
So
those
are
indicated
in
blue
and
purple
next
slide.
Please.
F
Here
we
have
the
elevations.
This
is
showing
the
north
elevation
of
the
property
of
the
proposed
edition
as
well
as
you
can
see
the
steps
next
slide.
Please-
and
here
we
have
the
west
elevation-
that's
proposed
by
the
applicant.
So
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
door
in
the
steps,
as
well
as
the
existing
building.
Next
slide.
Please
there
have
been
no
comments
received
from
the
public
at
this
time.
F
F
The
use
and
height
of
the
proposed
edition
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
bylaw
and
represents
appropriate
and
desirable
development
of
the
law
and
will
be
functional
for
the
continued
residential
use.
The
requested
variance
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
8499.
F
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure,
and
the
requested
variance
is
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection
45.1
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions
which
are
available
in
exhibit
a
of
this
report.
F
Approval
of
this
application
will
allow
for
the
existing
mud
room
to
be
replaced
by
an
approximately
8.2
square
meter,
rear
single
story
edition
and
an
approximately
2.1
square
meter
set
of
steps
projecting
west
from
the
proposed
edition,
I
believe
as
well.
We
have
the
applicant
sam
carls,
carlstrom
and
planner
mark
tau
to
speak
to
the
application.
Should
there
be
any
additional
questions,
I'm
here
as
well,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
oh
yeah,
and
we
don't
need
to
share
those,
but
I
have
some
additional
information
should
we
need
it?
F
G
H
A
I
D
J
A
I
K
L
A
E
F
F
F
It's
a
little
bit
tricky
to
see
here,
but
the
black
outlined
parcel
shows
both
three
and
one
church
street
the
ones
a
little
bit
close
to
the
property
boundary,
so
it
merges
in
with
the
image
a
little
bit,
but
please
note
that
one
is
on
the
south
portion
of
the
property
facing
king
street
and
the
rear
frame
dwelling
is
in
three
next
slide.
Please,
oh
sorry,
can
we
go
back
just
one
slide.
F
All
right
next
slide!
Please
here
are
the
elevations
submitted
by
the
applicant
as
well
as
a
nice
photo,
which
shows
a
little
bit
more
clearly
the
the
frame
versus
the
stone
stone
structure
on
the
top
right
of
the
screen.
So
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
expand
the
the
frame
dwelling
on
the
top
left.
You
can
see
there
is
a
smaller
portion
which
we're
extending
to
have
a
second
story,
so
it
currently
is
one
story
and
it's
being
requested
that
it
be
allowed
to
extend
to
a
second
story
next
slide.
F
Please
here
is
the
north
and
the
west
elevations,
so
you
can
see
what
the
proposed
elevations
will.
Look
like.
Please
note
that
this
is
an
inherited.
This
is
a
heritage
property
and
these
elevations
have
been
reviewed
and
supported
by
heritage.
Kingston
next
slide,
please
all
right
as
well.
We
have
the
east
elevation,
which
shows
the
side
of
the
frame
structure
which
about
665
king
street
west,
and
this
indicates
the
height
as
well
as
where
the
neighbor's
arbor
is
fastened
to
the
wall.
F
Next
slide,
please
as
well
here
are
the
floor
plans
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant,
which
shows
the
additional
living
space
that
this
expansion
will
allow
next
slide
please
as
well.
There
were
no
comments
that
were
submitted
in
regard
to
this
file.
Next
slide,
please,
the
requested
application
for
permission
is
consistent
with
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
8499.
F
The
use
and
height
of
the
proposed
second
story
edition
and
new
and
new
roofline
are
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
bylaw
and
represents
appropriate
and
desirable
development
of
the
law
and
will
be
functional
for
their
continued
residential
use.
Approval
of
this
application
will
allow
for
the
expansion
of
the
existing
attached
frame
dwelling
to
permit
a
second
story
addition
and
a
new
fruit
roof
line
on
the
existing
footprint,
which
has
existing
non-complying
yards.
I
believe
as
well.
F
A
M
I
J
K
A
Call
again
is
there
anyone
wishing
to
speak
to
the
application
of
three
or
one
church
street
the
third
and
final
time?
Does
anybody
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
of
three
and
one
church
street,
seeing
as
none
I
will
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
now
I'll
turn
to
the
committee
for
a
motion.
A
E
G
G
This
is
a
site
plan
submitted
for
the
application
indicating
the
placement
of
the
shed
on
the
exterior
side
yard
at
stonework
drive
and
the
heat
pump
on
the
interior
side
yard.
The
pink
line
represents
the
proposed
fencing
to
be
installed
around
the
property
for
privacy
and
visual
screening
purposes.
G
G
G
K
J
K
A
K
A
A
E
N
N
The
permission
is
requested
to
demolish
and
reconstruct
an
existing
legal
non-conforming
cottage.
Currently
in
a
state
of
disrepair,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
enlarge
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
by
approximately
140
square
feet,
as
well
as
increase
the
shoreline
setback
from
2
to
8
meters.
As
per
crca
regulations.
N
N
N
A
sign
was
posted
on
the
property
notice
was
mailed
to
non-recipients,
and
a
courtesy
ad
was
printed
in
the
wig
standard.
At
the
time
this
presentation
was
finalized.
One
public
comment
was
received
in
support
of
the
application
next
slide.
Please,
this
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval.
A
O
J
O
A
Now
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
meeting
and
ask
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
of
36
harrison
lane,
please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
anybody
wish
to
speak
to
the
application.
36
harrison
lane.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
the
third
and
final
time.
If
anybody
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
36
harrison
lane,
please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
we'll
come
back.
Our
yeah
we'll
turn
to
the
committee
for
a
motion.
A
E
E
Here
are
the
key
map
and
neighborhood
contacts
maps
for
reference.
As
you
can
see,
the
existing
clubhouse
building
is
on
the
north
side
of
the
property.
Next
slide.
Please,
the
applicant
is
seeking
permission
to
expand
the
existing
non-complying
clubhouse
building,
which
involves
increasing
the
non-conformity,
with
the
minimum
side
yard
setback
requirement,
as
shown
in
the
table
on
the
slide
next
slide.
Please.
E
E
E
Q
E
E
Next
slide,
please,
a
sign
was
posted
on
the
property
notice
was
mailed
to
the
surrounding
property
owners,
and
a
courtesy,
odd
was
placed
in
the
wig
standard,
and
no
public
comments
have
been
received
for
this
application
next
slide,
please,
the
planning
department
recommends
approval
of
this
application
and
I
leave
this
in
your
hands.
Mr
vice
chair.
A
R
Good
evening,
mr
chair,
my
name
is
mike
keane
and
I'm
a
land
use
planner
with
photon
consultants
located
on
fort
carrockway
street,
and
I'm
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
tennis
club
and
I'm
also
joined
with
raymond
zaybach.
The
architect-
and
I
know
a
couple
of
our
our
members-
are
also
observing
from
the
tennis
club
itself
and
I
don't
have
anything
to
add
to
lindsay's
presentation,
but
I
would
be
pleased
to
assist
with
any
questioning
that
might
arise.
Thank
you.
A
A
L
L
Mr
race
chair,
thank
you
very
much.
I
am
jennifer
conklin.
I
live
at
15
napier
street
directly
beside
the
apprentice
club.
My
question
is:
with
the
increase
in
the
size
of
the
building,
I'm
assuming
their
their
plan
is
to
be
able
to
accommodate
more
people.
What
is
the
noise
level
going
to
be
like
for
residents
in
the
area,
as
people
are
already
at
the
tennis
club
until
11
p.m?
Most
nights.
R
B
R
R
Start,
mr
chair
and
and
I
can
allow
other
members
of
our
team
to
add
or
staff,
if
needed,
I'll
start
in
the
reverse
order,
with
respect
to
the
sign.
The
sign
for
this
application
is
an
11
by
17
paper,
size
11
by
17,
bright
orange
sign
that
is
attached
to
the
the
fence
along
napier
and
fair
enough.
If
the
the
person
didn't
was
not
able
to
see
that
sign,
it
is,
it
is
posted
it's
it's
zip
tied
to
the
fence
of
the
property
and
as
point
of
view
as
possible.
R
The
second
question
related
to
to
more
of
a
noise
question.
The
the
purpose
of
the
application
is
to
revamp
the
entire
clubhouse
and
not
because
of
any
size
change
to
membership.
But
if,
if
folks
know
the
building
at
all,
it's
actually
a
seasonal
building
and
it
it's
shut
down
in
the
winter,
and
it
will
remain
that
way.
A
R
That's
that's
correct
to
you,
mr
chair
right
now
the
the
change
rooms
are
inadequate
and
that's
really.
The
primary
reason
for
this
change
is
is
both
for
storage
and
to
make
proper
change
rooms
available
to
people.
This
is
not
going
to
become
an
olympic
event
by
any
means
olympic
stadium
style
event.
It
really
is
to
service
the
current
membership
and
and
really
just
to
to
address
some
some
larger
renovations
that
are
hoped
for
the
building.
D
Can
I
add
to
this?
Yes,
my
name
is
jason
taylor,
I'm
on
the
board
of
directors
of
the
tennis
club.
So
our
intention
is
not
to
increase
our
membership
and
we
still
are
only
gonna
have
seven
courts,
so
nothing
is
changing
and
and
as
far
as
parties,
they've
always
had
socials,
but
their
intent
is
not
to
have
more
socials,
you
know
or
barbecues.
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
that
you
know
same
number
of
courts
and
there
won't
be
any
difference
in
noise.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned.
Q
Q
The
building
is
in
need
of
a
lot
of
repairs,
there's
some
structural
work
that
needs
to
be
done
and
we
are
eliminating
through
this
project.
There's
a
small
storage
shed.
I
think,
lindsay's
site
plan
showed
it
on
the
north.
End
of
the
property
that
is
coming
down
and
what's
being
stored
in
there
is,
will
be
stored
inside
the
building.
Now.
A
Q
P
P
That
appeal
was
withdrawn
by
the
applicant,
who,
I
guess,
went
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
redesigned
their
proposal
and
submitted
a
building
permit
for
and
a
detached
second
residential
unit.
Now,
in
our
zoning
bylaw
provisions,
there
are
different
regulations
for
both
attached
and
detached
second
residential
units
and
the
three
variances
that
formed
part
of
the
report
of
the
attached
recommended
sorry
of
the
attached
second
residential
unit
that
staff
had
recommended
are
not
applicable
to
the
detached
second
residential
unit.
P
So
I
was
speaking
with
the
deputy
building
official
and
the
chief
building
official
about
this
and
the
file
planner,
who
reviewed
the
building
permit
and
through
that
building
permit
process.
The
detached
second
residential
unit
actually
meets
all
zone
provisions
for
a
second
residential
unit,
and
that's
why
the
building
permit
was
issued
so
because
it
was
zone
compliant.
There's
no
notice
requirements
like
a
planning
act
application
and
then
the
permit
can
be
issued.
A
H
I
A
So
now
there
was
one
piece
of
correspondence
received
which
was
an
addendum
for
support
for
36
harrison
lane
that
we
all
read
and
we
went
through
so
now.
The
date
of
the
next
meeting
is
september
20th
at
5
30
pm,
and
can
I
call
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
move
by
somnath
and
second
by
paul
all
in
favor.