►
Description
Committee of Adjustment from April 19, 2021. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3ejmnwE.
A
Well,
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
the
meeting
good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
on
your
screen.
You'll
see
members
of
the
committee
of
adjustment.
Now
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
this
evening
and
even
though
you
won't
see
them,
you
will
hear
them
chime
in
from
time
to
time.
Our
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsay
staman
and
our
clerk
is
elizabeth,
fawcett
and
they'll
be
hosting
the
meeting
and
running
the
zoom
platform
from
behind
the
scenes.
A
Now
the
agenda
and
the
schedules
for
this
meeting
have
been
posted
on
dash
on
the
city's
website
and,
if
you
don't
have
those
documents
and
you'd
like
to
follow
along,
you
might
want
to
access
them
now.
So
we
have
10
agenda
items
for
this
evening
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
the
format
that
I'll
be
using
to
navigate
through
each
application.
A
I'm
going
to
start
by
introducing
an
applicant
and
I'll
give
the
applicant
or
their
agent
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further.
If
you
are
the
applicant
or
the
agent,
and
you
have
nothing
for
the
dua,
then
just
simply
say
so.
Next
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Now
it's
at
that
time,
I'm
going
to
invite
members
of
the
public
to
raise
their
virtual
hand
in
zoom
if
they
have
any
questions
or
comments
in
respect
of
the
application.
A
If
you
do
have
a
question
or
if
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer.
It's
during
this
public
portion
of
the
meeting
that
we
will
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments,
and
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Will
the
questions
and
comments
be
addressed
by
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff
next
I'll
invite
the
applicant
or
staff
to
address
those
public
comments,
after
which
I'll
turn
back
to
the
committee
I'll
ask
them
to
make
a
motion
and
then
we
can
deliberate
on
the
application.
A
So
at
that
time,
if
you're
the
applicant
you're
free
to
leave
the
meeting,
now,
I'm
going
to
be
using
the
same
format
for
each
application
this
evening.
So
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell.
Now,
if
you
do
have
a
personal
interest
in
any
particular
application
and
you'd
like
to
receive
written
notice
of
tonight's
decision,
then
please
send
an
email
with
your
name
and
address
to
our
secretary
treasurer
lindsay
stamen.
Her
email
address
is
l-s-t-h-a-m-a-n
at
city
of
kingston.ca.
A
A
And
all
in
favor
raise
your
hands
and
that's
unanimously
carried
okay.
Now
we're
on
to
confirmation
of
the
minute.
So
can
I
have
somebody
move
that
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
from
march
22nd
be
approved,
say
moved
by
jordan
and
seconded
by
paul
any
discussion
on
those
okay,
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that
would
be
carried.
A
B
A
I
see
none.
Okay,
thanks
very
much
for
that.
We
have
no
delegations
this
evening
and
there
are
no
requests
for
deferral.
Nor
are
there
any
returning
deferred
items.
So
our
first
piece
of
new
business
that
we
have
is
actually
number
eight
a
which
is
an
application
for
minor
variants.
Lindsay.
Can
I
have
you
read
this
into
the
record.
Please.
C
C
D
D
The
three
variances
in
question
as
mentioned:
are
the
projections
into
yards,
which
relates
to
an
existing
entrance
where
the
there's
a
proposed
covered
porch
to
be
to
be
built
and
the
minimum
front
yard,
which
relates
to
the
third
floor
addition,
it's
relief,
basically
on
the
up
in
the
third
floor
and
the
maximum
building
height,
which
is
in
regard
to
the
design
of
the
specific.
The
specific
design
of
the
edition
proposed
next
slide.
Please.
D
So
this
is
the
you
can
see
in
red
the
footprint
of
the
house
in
question.
I'd
like
to
just
note
for
you
that
there
is
an
encroachment
which
is
permitted
currently
by
the
city
at
the
front
of
the
house.
That's
existing
and
so
currently
the
the
applicant
is
not
proposing
any
change
to
the
footprint
of
the
of
the
home
for
either
the
covered,
porch
proposed
feature
or
the
third
floor
edition.
D
So
this
is
the
front
and
west
the
the
southern
elevations
here
on
the
on
the
left
and
the
on
the
west
elevations
on
your
right
hand,
side
there.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
the
the
relief
for
the
height
of
the
flat
roof
is
for
the
the
element
at
the
top
they're
proposing
to
raise
slightly
the
existing
height
of
the
building,
and
but
there
is
not
going
to
be
any
requirement
for
relief
from
the
overall
height
of
the
building.
D
It's
just
for
the
fact
that
it's
a
flat
roof
and
again
you
can
see
that
the
in
the
in
the
right
hand
side.
It's
a
gives
you
a
better
view
of
both
the
covered
porch
element
on
the
front
as
well.
You
can
see
that
the
third
floor
element
that's
proposed
is
not
actually
going
to
be
directly
over
the
front
wall-
the
house,
but
will
be
set
back
as
well
from
the
front
wall,
but
they're
still
requesting
relief
in
order
to
accommodate
the
the
minimum
front
yard
next
slide.
Please.
D
There's
no
change
intended
for
the
single
detached
dwelling
from
a
used
perspective
we
did
require.
We
did
receive
one
query
and
since
the
creation
of
this
presentation,
actually
there
was
a
comment
received
and
it
was
in
support
of
the
application,
and
I
believe
the
members
of
committee
have
received
that
as
an
addendum.
D
So
ultimately,
the
recommendation
is
that
the
the
requested
variances
be
are
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions,
which
are
also
part
of
the
exhibits
provided,
and
the
intent
here
is
that
the
the
approval
of
the
application
is
going
to
permit
the
construction
of
the
third
floor
edition
and
the
the
covered
porch
for
weather
protection.
And
again,
this
is
all
over
an
existing
building.
Footprint.
A
A
E
A
A
A
And
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
are
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
149
ordinance
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'll
call
one
third
and
final
time
or
any
members
of
the
public
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
149
ordinance
street.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
I'll
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion.
A
A
A
F
The
file
number
is
d13003
2021
next
slide,
please,
the
applicant
has
constructed
a
new
in-ground
swimming
pool
and
a
pool
shed
and
is
proposing
a
pergola
in
the
rear
yard
variants
from
zoning
bylaw
number
3274
is
required
to
reduce
minimum
setback
from
floodplain
for
the
subject,
development
three
variances
has
been
requested
and
one
is
for
the
swimming
pool,
which
the
variance
requested
is
eight
point
three
meters
for
the
pull
shed,
the
variance
request,
that
is
five
meter
and
for
the
pergola.
The
variance
requested
is
four
meters.
F
Next
slide,
please,
in
1998,
a
minor
variance
application
was
approved
by
the
committee
of
adjustment
to
permit
a
setback
of
10
meters
from
the
floodplain
to
accommodate
a
swimming
pool
and
an
accessory
pool
shed
on
the
subject
property,
the
construction
of
the
new
swimming
pool,
a
pool
shed
and
a
pergola
involved,
the
removal
of
the
existing
swimming
pool
and
accessory
structure
next
slide.
Please.
F
The
property
is
currently
developed
with
a
two-story
single
detached
dwelling,
an
in-ground
swimming
pool
and
an
accessory
structure
used
as
a
pull
shed.
The
subject
property
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
kenwood
circle
and
about
cataract
river
to
the
west
and
single
detached
dwelling
houses
to
the
north,
east
and
south,
many
of
which
have
in-ground
swimming
pools
and
accessory
structures.
F
Next
slide,
please,
the
applicant
has
constructed
a
new
in-ground
swimming
pool,
a
pool
shed
and
is
proposing
a
percola.
As
you
can
see,
see
on
the
side
plan.
Drawing
a
new
1.8
meter,
wood
fence
is
proposed
to
be
erected
around
along
the
north,
south
and
west
property
lines.
A
new
deck
is
proposed
within
the
existing
deck
footprint
at
the
rear
of
the
house,
and
an
existing
retaining
wall
is
proposed
to
be
further
built
up
next
slide.
Please,
the
subject:
property
is
designated
residential
and
environmental
protection
area.
F
The
primary
use
of
the
property
is
single-family
dwelling,
which
is
proposed
to
remain
unchanged.
Uses
within
epa
are
limited
to
open
space
conservation
and
flood
protection
and
must
be
approved
in
consultation
with
the
karaki
region
conservation
authority.
This
application
has
been
reviewed
by
crca
and
the
applicant
has
been
informed
about
the
required
permit
next
slide.
Please,
the
new
pool
is
located
closer
to
the
water
than
the
original
pool.
However,
the
new
pool
remains
behind
the
existing
retaining
wall
at
the
shoreline.
F
F
However,
engineering
services
has
requested
a
revised
grading
plan
to
further
ensure
that
their
drainage
will
be
prevented
from
flowing
onto
adjacent
properties.
Next
slide,
please
subject:
property
is
not
on
the
city's
heritage
register.
However,
it
is
adjacent
to
a
portion
of
the
riddle
canal,
ward,
here,
world
heritage
site,
reorientation
of
the
pool
should
have
no
further
impact
on
the
heritage
value
of
the
whs.
F
F
Several
properties
contain
swimming
pool
and
accessory
structures
in
this
area.
The
site
layout
provides
for
adequate
and
desirable
amenity
and
landscape
area
next
slide.
Please,
the
property
is
zoned
residential
type,
1
and
flat
plane
in
the
zoning
bylaw
number
3274,
as
per
section
522,
no
building
or
structure
other
than
a
marine
facility
or
marina,
shall
be
located
less
than
15
meters.
From
a
flat
plain
zoning
byla
defines
flood
plain
as
the
area
below
the
high
water
mark
of
a
water
body.
F
F
Access
for
safe
ingress
and
aggress
is
primarily
intended
for
buildings
and
structures
and
is
not
a
concern
in
this
circumstance.
The
new
development
is
outside
the
erosion
hazard
limit
and
given
the
amount
of
previous
disturbance
at
the
site
and
the
fact
that
new
development
is
not
encroach
closer
than
the
existing
retaining
wall
near
the
water.
It
is
not
anticipated
to
impose
negative
impacts
to
the
provincially
significant
wetlands
next
slide.
F
Please,
the
variances
are
appropriate
and
desirable
development,
as
it
will
allow
the
renovation
of
the
amenities
of
the
rear
yard
and
is
consistent
with
the
nature
of
the
waterfront
development
in
the
area.
The
variances
are
minor
in
nature,
as
the
proposed
reduction
of
minimum
setback
from
floodplain
is
considered
a
minor
change
to
the
existing
development
and
to
date
no
written
or
oral
submissions
have
been
received
relating
to
this
application.
Therefore,
the
approval
of
the
subject
application
is
recommended
to
the
community
of
adjustment,
subject
to
the
conditions
outlined
in
the
report.
Thank
you.
A
G
Good
evening,
mr
chair,
my
name
is
mike
keane
and
I'm
a
land
use
planner
with
photon
consultants,
and
our
office
is
located
in
the
woolen
mill
for
cataract
way
street
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
owner,
and
I
I
don't
have
anything
to
add
to
golsa's
presentation
tonight.
It
was
very
clear
I
will
remain
in
the
audience.
Should
committee
or
or
any
members
of
the
public
have
questions
that
require
my
assistance.
Thank.
A
A
A
So
are
any
members
of
the
public
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
60
kenwood
circle?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom,
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll.
Ask
one
more
time.
Are
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
60
kenwood
circle?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
we'll
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
vinson
seconded
by
greg.
A
A
C
H
So
we
have
an
application.
The
address
is
292
dalton
avenue.
The
application
type
is
for
permission,
file,
number
d13,
011
2021,
the
purpose
and
effect
of
the
application.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
further
define
the
industrial
uses
which
are
defined
in
the
industrial
m
zone
to
include
a
truck
and
trailer
training
center.
A
truck
or
freight
terminal
is
currently
permitted
within
the
m
zone
in
zoning
by
law.
Number
8499
next
slide.
H
H
Oh,
I
forget
what
it
is
now
sorry,
I
think
they're
called
happy
anyways
there's
the
motorcycle
sales
place
right
across
the
street
and
friendly
fires
across
the
street
as
well
too,
to
the
east
is
a
door
and
window
manufacturing
and
actually
to
the
south.
We
have
a
truck
repair
facility,
which
is
at
five
cocktail
place
and
at
four
cattail
place
is
actually
a.
H
A
construction
depot
next
slide
there
please,
so
a
request
for
permission
is
a
little
different
than
a
minor
variance.
This
is
actually
under
section
45
2b
of
the
planning
act,
which
states
that,
in
addition,
in
addition
to
the
powers
of
the
committee
of
adjustment
under
section
45
1,
the
committee
upon
any
such
application,
where
the
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure
permitted
in
the
bylaw
are
defined
in
general
terms,
may
permit
a
use
of
any
land
building
or
structure
for
any
purpose.
H
That,
in
the
opinion
of
the
committee,
conforms
with
the
uses
permitted
in
the
bylaw.
So
in
this,
so
to
summarize
it,
the
committee
has
the
authority
to
permit
a
use
which
is
similar
to
the
existing
uses
that
are
currently
in
the
bylaw.
So
if
it's
silent
on
a
certain
type
of
use
or
it's
very
similar,
but
it's
not
overly
defined
in
the
bylaw,
the
committee
has
a
right
to
permit
that
use
if
it's
very
similar
to
the
existing
uses
that
are
already
committed
next
slide.
H
H
So
at
this
time,
there's
no
written
comments
or
objections
received
from
the
public
prior
to
tonight's
meeting.
Regarding
the
proposal,
there
was
one
general
comment
from
the
budding
landowner
to
the
east,
which
is
the
door
and
window
manufacturer.
They
just
had
a
general
question
in
regards
to
civic
addressing,
but
that
issue
was
dealt
with.
It
wasn't
an
issue
with
the
proposal
next
slide.
H
As
the
training
facility
is,
we
feel
accessory
to
a
a
trucking
facility
if
a
if
the
owner
built
a
trucking
facility
and
then
wanted
to
put
in
a
training
center
as
an
accessory
use,
he
would
have
been
able
to
do
that
without
coming
to
the
committee,
but
because
the
training
facility
is
actually
going
to
be
a
or
a
primary
use.
That's
the
only
reason
why
he
is
here
to
to
ask
for
this
to
be
a
primary
use,
next
slide
and
that's
it.
A
A
Okay,
and
are
you
the
the
applicant
or
the
agent,
I'm
the
obligant
okay,
and
is
there
anything
further?
You
wish
to
add
to
the
presentation
we've
heard
this
evening.
Definitely
nothing
here,
the
team
it
covers
most
of
the
part,
okay,
very,
very
good.
So
I'll
pull
it
over
to
the
committee
now
and
ask
committee
members:
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
or
for
staff
and
I'm
seeing
a
silent
committee?
So
I
don't
have
any
any
questions.
A
Okay,
so
I'll
turn
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
now
and
ask
for
members
of
the
public.
Are
you
interested
in
speaking
to
the
application
for
292
dalton
avenue?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
again
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
292
dalton
avenue?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
I'm
seeing
none
and
I'll
ask
one
more
time.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
292
dalton
avenue?
A
A
A
C
J
E
K
It's
actually
very
fortuitous
that
I
came
after
mr
fisher
there,
because
mine
is
also
a
permission,
as
you
can
clearly
see,
and
he's
already
correctly
summarized
where
that
comes
in
the
planning
act,
so
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
go
through
this
and
save
some
time
next
slide,
please,
okay!
So
in
this
case
this
proposal
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
operate
independent,
exterior
entrance
and
exit
for
permitted
clinic
use.
K
However,
this
clinic
uses
are
only
permitted
to
have
interior
entrances,
and
this
is
in
this
clinic
use
is
permitted
in
the
area
that
the
building
would
be
operating
in
just
a
flag.
One
other
thing
that
mr
fisher
said
just
to
really
bring
it
home
is
that
an
application
for
permission
under
the
planning
act
for
52
or
40
45
2b
has
the
two
following
tests
that
we
need
to
satisfy
here
in
order
to
approve
this
application.
K
This
would
be
a
similarity
between
the
uses,
and
the
second
would
be
whether
the
proposed
use
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land.
So
now,
coming
back
to
the
presentation
over
here,
the
main
thing
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
is
this
clinic
definition?
So
I
will
read
it
in
full
here.
K
So,
in
this
case,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
have
a
separate
entrance
for
their
clinic
instead
of
having
to
be
within
one
clinic
itself
with
multiple
entrances
to
different
practices
inside
so
approval
of
this
application
will
permit
an
additional
entrance
and
or
end
or
exit
to
be
utilized
by
the
clinic
operating
at
812
john
mark's
avenue
for
a
single
medical
practitioner's
office
to
be
accessed
from
the
exterior
entrance
or
exit
next
slide.
Please.
K
Okay,
so
looking
at
the
first
on
the
left
and
then
going
into
a
circle
here,
this
is
the
location
of
the
property.
It's
actually
located
in
the
new
medical
campus,
that's
being
built
in
this
area.
Here
to
the
right.
You
can
actually
see
it.
There
highlighted
a
little
bit
of
blue
at
the
bottom
right
of
the
second
picture.
That's
where
it
will
be.
K
You
can
see
the
same
at
the
bottom,
which
is
an
aerial
view
and
then
looking
at
the
last
switches
to
the
bottom
left,
that's
actually
what
the
building
is
going
to
look
like
in
terms
of
its
site
plan.
The
red
arrow
denotes
where
the
second
entrance
would
be.
The
first
entrance
would
be
where
those
two
accessible
parking
spaces
are
a
little
bit
further
south.
K
K
So
this
is
the
same
image
as
the
one
we
just
saw,
but
focused
in
the
red
arrow
is
where
the
proposed
entrance
would
be
the
independent
entrance.
In
this
case,
the
building
is
connected,
as
you
can
see
to
the
rest
of
the
business
park
with
internal
walkways
and
roadways.
It
is
kind
of
as
a
medical
campus
would
be.
K
So,
as
we
can
see
here,
this
is
a
building
rendering
of
where
that
entrance
will
be
the
red
arrow
and
the
second
image
again
denotes
where
that
will
be
so.
The
new
entrance
is
anticipated
to
be
within
10
meters
of
the
main
building
entrance
and
10
to
15
meters
from
both
accessible
parking
spaces.
The
newly
proposed
entrance
would
open
up
to
the
internal
walkway
area
of
the
site,
like
the
entrances
of
the
subject,
building
and
other
adjacent
clinic
buildings.
K
Excuse
me,
this
permission
is
not
anticipated
to
change
the
intensity
of
the
use
at
the
permitted
clinic
site
as
there's
no
additional
uses
being
proposed.
It
is
the
same
use
but
with
a
different
configuration,
and
it
will
not
change
the
flows
of
traffic
change
in
function
or
will
not
impact
or
inhibit
neighboring
buildings
from
functioning
as
intended
and
as
you
can
see
at
the
bottom
here.
One
of
our
major
concerns
here
was
that
we
don't
want
people
get
confused
as
most
people
in
this
case
in
this
area,
one
clinic
entrance
standard.
K
So
we
did
make
a
condition
here
that
says
for
clinic
use
with
more
than
one
entrance
where
one
entrance
allows
independent
access
from
the
exterior
of
the
building
for
clinic
use
prior
to
applying
for
a
building
permit.
The
owner
shall
apply
for
and
obtain
a
separate
civic
address
of
a
different
unit
number
than
that
used
for
the
other
building
entrance.
So
in
this
case
it
will
be
clearly
separate
from
the
other
building
that
is
there,
and
there
will
be
two
different
unit
numbers
to
clearly
denote.
K
One
is
separate
from
the
other
next
slide,
please
so
we've
already
gone
over
the
definition
of
clinic
here
again
before
I
summarize
my
points
in
the
next
slide.
I
just
want
to
focus
in
again
at
the
bolded
word
down
there,
so
the
bolded
wording
is
the
part
that
does
trigger
this
permission,
and
so
again,
it's
provided
that
all
such
uses
have
access
only
from
the
interior
of
the
building
or
structure
next
slide.
Please.
K
K
A
new
entrance
slash
exit
for
one
building
within
this
medical
campus
appears
to
fit
the
intent
of
this
policy,
as
the
entire
medical
campus
is
considered
as
one
want.
Despite
the
campus
not
being
not
being
a
building
or
structure,
it
is
a
single
entity
in
terms
of
its
zoning
considerations
and
its
overall
functionality
as
a
single
medical
campus,
the
campus
has
its
own
internal
walking
network
parking
and
driving
network
with
multiple
other
clinic
users
in
close
proximity.
K
So
we
are
recommending
that
this
application
is
is
approved
because
it
is
consistent
with
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan.
Zoning
bylaw,
70
3274
and
the
use
complies
with
the
general
intent
of
the
site,
specific
bd2
zone,
and
it
is
a
permitted
use
of
the
official
plan
and
it
is
a
permitted
use
and
it
is
the
permitted
use
for
the
entire
st
lawrence
medical
campus
and
next
slide,
and
that's
it.
K
We
have
our
three
typical
conditions:
there,
so
limitation,
no
adverse
impacts,
building
from
requirements
and
that
civic
address
requirement
that
I
said
earlier
for
you
guys.
So
with
that
in
mind,
if
anyone
has
questions
or
comments,
I'd
be
more
than
willing
to
to
address
them.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
J
A
I
A
A
No,
so
are
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
8
12
john
mark's
avenue.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'll
call
one
last
and
final
time.
If
anybody
is
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
812
john
marks
avenue,
please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
not
seeing
any
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
greg
and
seconded
by
paul.
A
A
C
M
M
So
the
purpose
and
effect
of
this
consent
application
is
to
sever
off
one
lot.
So
the
one
lot
would
be
454.9
square
meters
and
it
would
have
lot
furniture
along
school
street.
The
retained
portion
will
be
646
square
meter
lot
with
a
lot
of
furniture
along
spruel
and
westbrook
road.
The
retained
parcel
land
will
have
a
existing
single
family
dwelling
and
an
attached
rear
deck
on
the
property
as
well.
So
the
next
slide
please.
M
M
M
The
two
proposed
application
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
bylaw
and
represents
appropriate
and
desirable
development
for
the
two
lots
next
slide.
Please
so
there's
four
variances
that
are
being
applied
for
one
is
lot
area,
so
they
only
need
to
ask
for
9.6
square
meters
from
the
minimum
lot
area
for
both
lots.
The
other
lot
that
has
the
existing
single
family
dwelling
is
in
the
600
square
meters,
so
it's
well
over
the
minimum
and
a
lot
of
frontages
so
step
back
from
the
rear.
M
So
this
is
for
the
new
single
family
dwelling
it's
to
permit
the
second
floor,
balcony
deck
and
the
staircases
at
the
front.
So
going
moving
back
to
the
existing
single
family
dwelling,
it
would
need
a
setback
from
the
rear
lot
line
for
the
existing
dwelling
and
the
existing
deck.
So
that's
variances
three
and
four
next
slide
please.
M
So
this
property
is
located
betw
on
the
corner
of
westbrook
road
and
sprual
street,
it's
in
the
westbrook
area,
so
you
can
see
the
existing
single
family
on
the
left
and
the
new
proposed
single
family
on
the
hash
mark.
There
next
slide,
please
so
here's
the
plot
plan,
so
you
can
see
the
existing
deck
and
the
existing
single
family
dwelling.
The
garage
is
attached
now,
that's
another
one.
I
want
to
point
out
and
the
exist,
so
the
proposed
single
family
dwelling
is
on
the
right
with
the
staircases
and
the
setbacks
located
there.
M
E
M
Construction
of
this
elevation
next
slide,
please
so
the
requested
variances
and
consent
applications
maintains
the
intent
and
purposes
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaws
766..
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
their
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure
and
requested
variances
are
minor
in
nature
assets.
The
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
in
the
subsection
45
1
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
M
A
K
A
A
L
A
L
A
A
A
A
M
E
M
So
I
can
go
over
the
questions
they
asked,
so
they
asked
three
specific
questions
on
one
of
them:
yeah
in
terms
of
servicing
so
for
water
and
septic.
So
I've
directly
spoken
to
utilities
kingston
on
this
matter
so
and
they've
come
back
and
informed
me
that
the
creation
of
a
new
single-family
dwelling
will
not
have
any
negative
effects
on
the
neighboring
properties
for
water
capacity
or
sewer
sewage
capacity.
M
M
Sign
off
that
this
will
not
negatively
negatively
affect
any
of
the
properties
in
terms
of
the
number
three
question:
traffic
issues
or
anything,
and
there
was
like
emergency
services
coming
down
the
street.
So
the
proposal
and
the
existing
single
family
dwelling
provides
one
parking
spot
and
more
so.
The
proposed
single
family
dwelling
has
a
two-car
garage
plus
the
appropriate
zoning
bylaw
measurement
of
frontier
parking
spot
six
meters
by
two
point:
seven,
so
they
provide
one
parking
spot
plus
additional
parking
inside
the
garage.
The
existing.
M
I
guess
retained
lot
on
the
left
so
currently
addressed
144
squirrel
street.
They
have
a
two-car
garage
and
a
very
large
driveway,
so
they
could
in
theory,
provide
more
than
the
minimum
one
yard
or
one
car
for
the
single
family
dwelling.
Also,
I've
talked
to
mark
the
owner
of
the
property,
and
I
have
no
zoning
concerns
for
the
use
of
the
property,
if
someone's
renting
it
out
or
use
it
or
if
the
owner's
living
there.
M
It
is
a
single
family
dwelling
and
there's
no
zoning
issues
in
terms
of
that
rental
apartments,
and
also
important
to
note
in
the
west
brook
meadows
area,
secondary
suites
aren't
permitted
as
of
right
now
to
just
go
to
the
building
permit
stage
and
get
one.
So
it's
one
fan
one
single
family
dwelling,
one
kitchen
in
each
single
family
dwelling.
A
Okay,
thanks
for
that,
I
think
that
what
I
inferred
from
the
letters
from
the
neighbors
was
that
the
that
you
know
from
mr
willis
will
adds
in
not
being
on
site
and
renting
it
out.
The
neighbors
are
actually
a
problem.
If
I'm
reading
the
letters
correctly,
I
mean
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
and
the
question
is
what's
going
to
happen
with
this
new
property,
is
it's
just
going
to
double
the
existing?
A
L
Yeah
I
already
talked
to
my
tenants
and
the
thing
is
two
of
them
changed
occupations
and
they
had
two
vehicles
at
the
time
and
I
wasn't
aware
that
they
and
they
were
over
parking,
their
privileged
rights
and
and
they're
they're.
Addressing
that
now
and
the
the
only
the
only
there
there's
enough
cars
for
for
everyone
that
lives
in
the
house.
The
park
in
the
driveway
and
whoever
else
is
parked
in
front
of
the
house-
is
either
visiting
or
or
whatever,
and
that's
really
out
of
my
control.
L
M
A
A
Any
discussion
on
this,
the
only
discussion
I
had
I've
already
made
is
just
about
you
know,
responsible
ownership,
and
you
know
making
sure
that
this
fits
and
is
aligned
well
with
the
neighborhood,
but
any
other
discussion
from
any
other
member
okay.
So
we'll
call
for
the
vote.
All
in
favor
raise
your
hand,
and
that
is
unanimously
carried
thanks
very
much.
A
C
N
Wonderful,
thank
you
and
through
you,
mr
chair,
my
name
is
sarah
oldenberger,
I'm
a
planner
at
the
city
of
kingston,
and
this
is
for
11
gardner
street,
and
it
is
a
permission.
Application
next
slide.
Please
all
right.
The
purpose
and
effect
of
this
application
is
to
expand
the
existing
existing
single
family
dwelling
to
include
a
second
story.
Addition
replace
the
existing
porch
with
a
new,
enclosed,
mudroom
and
add
a
covered
porch
and
a
new
set
of
stairs
on
the
north
elevation
of
the
proposed
mud
room
which
lead
to
the
driveway.
N
All
right
can
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
all
right!
So
we've
got
the
map
here,
which
shows
the
subject
property
at
11
gardner
street.
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
on
the
east
side
of
gardner
street
in
between
union
and
king
street
west,
and
it's
just
across
from
aberdeen
park
all
right
next
slide,
please!
N
N
So
on
the
bottom,
in
this
picture
of
the
existing
or
the
proposed
mud
room
and
then
have
a
set
of
stairs
going
from
there
as
well,
which
will
be
easier
to
see
on
the
next
slide
in
the
elevation.
So
can
we
go
there
now,
all
right,
so
in
the
top
left
you
can
see
a
better
configuration
of
that
or
what
it's
going
to
look
like.
So
you
can
see.
There's
the
second
story
there,
as
well
as
the
mud
room
with
the
covered,
porch
and
proposed
stairs
as
well.
N
All
right
next
slide,
please
all
right!
So
we've
got
some
floor
plans
as
well
provided
by
the
applicant,
which
are
great
so
you
can
see
here.
This
is
the
main
floor,
as
well
as
the
proposed
mud
room,
the
proposed
covered
porch
and
the
stairs
that
will
be
leading
to
the
driveway
and,
as
you
can
see
this,
these
proposed
changes
will
increase
the
functional
living
space
of
the
area,
as
I
mentioned
before,
by
approximately
88.78
square
meters.
N
N
The
use
lot,
coverage
and
height
of
the
accessory
structure
is
inc
or
sorry.
The
height
of
the
that
should
read
primary
structure
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
by-law
and
represents
appropriate
and
desirable
development
on
the
lot
and
will
be
functional
for
the
continued
residential
use.
As
such,
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval,
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
N
A
No
problem
so
at
this
point,
can
I
please
call
on
the
applicant
or
their
agent
to
identify
themselves
by
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
please
give
me,
mr
chair,
can
you
hear
me
okay,
I
can
hear
you
fine,
yes,
wesley
and
kristen
brooks
and
our
our
place
of
residence
is
1283
kings,
princess
street.
A
A
A
Now,
I'm
not
seeing
any
attendees
in
the
in
the
public
gallery.
Well
I'll
I'll
still
call
two
more
times
or
any.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
eleven
gardner
street?
Please
raise
your
hand
in
zoom
and
the
third
and
final
time
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
11
gardner
street?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll,
pull
it
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
all
right
so
moved
by
paul
seconded
by.
A
O
A
C
N
N
All
right
next
slide,
please
so
the
key
map.
Here
you
can
see
the
property,
the
subject
property
at
226
and
228
king
street
east.
It's
located
mid
mid-block
through
facing
king
street
east
and
in
between
earl
street
and
william
street,
and
so
the
proposed
garage
would
be
in
the
backyard
of
the
subject.
N
Property
and
the
access,
as
I
mentioned
before,
would
be
provided
through
the
neighbor's
driveway
over
which
there's
a
right-of-way
registered
on
title,
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
here
as
well
that
the
subject
property
is
designated
under
part
four
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
it's
also
located
within
old
sydney,
conservation
district
under
port
5
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act.
All
right
next
slide,
please
all
right.
So
here
is
the
site
plan
and
also
landscaping
plan
provided
by
the
applicant,
and
it
shows
the
proposed
changes.
N
Those
are
both
going
to
be
removed,
and
I'd
also
like
to
mention
that
the
shed
is
not
of
heritage
value
and
then
on
the
right
you
can
see
there
is
a
new
garage
being
proposed
as
well
as
a
driveway.
These
propose
change.
Po.
These
sorry
excuse
me
all
the
proposed
changes,
except
for
the
size
of
the
new
garage,
meet
the
requirements.
N
So
that's
the
only
thing
that's
being
requested
tonight.
All
right
can
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
all
right.
So
these
these
are
preliminary
floor
plans.
I'd
also
like
to
mention
that
the
measurements
are
a
little
different.
This
is
with
the
the
packaged
garage
that
is
being
used,
but
the
applicant's
actually
going
to
be
making
it
larger
than
this,
so
the
actual
measurements
are
23
feet
and
six
inches
by
22..
So
these
are
the
drawings
there.
N
So
you
can
see,
there's
a
side
door
like
a
one
you
can
walk
through
and
then
there's
the
big
front
of
the
garage
and
both
of
those
the
side
door
be
facing
the
subject:
property,
the
interior
and
the
largemouth
would
be
facing
the
driveway
there.
All
right
next
slide.
Please
all
right
and
here's.
Some
elevations
I'd
like
to
mention
that
heritage
kingston
granted
conditional
approval
of
these
plans
and
was
satisfied
with
the
designs,
and
that
was
on
january
12.
2021.
N
next
slide.
Please
all
right!
The
requested
variance
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
number
8499.
The
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
land
building
or
structure,
and
the
requested
variance
is
minor
in
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
meets
all
four
tests
under
subsection,
45
1
of
the
planning
act
and
the
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
the
proposed
conditions.
N
So
approval
of
this
application
will
allow
for
the
construction
of
an
approximately
7.2
meter
by
6.8
meter
garage
in
the
rear
yard,
which
has
a
lot
coverage
of
16.5
percent
of
the
subject.
Property.
I'd
also
like
to
note,
there's
been
no
complaints
about
this
so
far
and
I
believe
the
applicant
brandon
potter
from
pc
construct.
Custom
construction
is
here
tonight
as
well
to
speak
to
the
application
as
well.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
about
this
application.
A
A
A
I
P
A
Thank
you
great.
That's
a
good
question,
all
right
committee
members,
any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
or
the
staff,
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
here
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
226
228
king
street
east?
Please
raise
your
hand
virtual
hand
and
zoom.
A
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
226
228
king
street
east?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
third
and
final
call
do
we
have
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
226
to
228
king
street
east?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
paul
and
seconded
by
somnath
any
discussion.
A
A
C
C
All
right,
so
the
purpose
and
effect
of
this
application
is
to
reduce
the
minimum
drive
aisle
width
and
to
reduce
the
combined
dimension
of
the
drive,
aisle
and
parking
space
length
in
order
to
accommodate
30
parking
spaces
for
the
stacked
townhouse
development
at
809
development
drive
next
slide.
Please
here
is
the
key
map
and
the
neighborhood
context
map
from
the
report
exhibits
for
reference
next
slide.
Please.
C
C
What
I've
done
is
shown
the
dry
vial
width
in
the
with
the
yellow
line
and
the
green
line
shows
the
proposed
combined
parking
space
length
and
drive
aisle
width
of
16.4
meters.
Just
so,
you
can
get
an
idea
of
what
these
two
variances
are
measuring
and,
while
we're
looking
at
this
site
plan
I'll
just
note
that
parking
space
number
29,
that
was
the
space
that
was
located
in
the
bottom
right
hand,
corner
of
the
plan
has
been
removed
by
the
applicant
based
on
recommendations
of
the
parking
study
that
was
completed.
C
C
So
I've
included
a
summary
of
the
recent
applications
for
this
property
on
this
slide
here.
For
you,
this
development
was
brought
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
twice
in
2020,
so
it
may
seem
familiar
to
you
in
june
2020.
There
was
an
application
for
consent
regarding
access
and
stormwater
easements
that
was
bumped
up
to
the
committee
and
again,
in
november
2020,
we
saw
a
minor
variance
application
that
one
was
d
13
0
3,
0
20
20.,
that
was
the
application
for
variances
to
the
height
of
a
front
porch
and
the
length
of
accessible
parking
spaces.
C
A
O
A
I
Is
that
to
lindsay,
if
I
may,
she
put
up
a
slide
a
few
minutes
ago
with
a
yellow
and
a
green
highlighted
area,
and
that
was
very
helpful.
But
actually
it
confused
me
a
little
as
well.
I'm
just
wondering
if
it's
possible
put
that
back
up-
and
I
was
trying
to
understand-
is
the
yellow,
highlighting
variance
one
in
the
green,
highlighting
variance.
C
Two
through
you,
mr
chair,
the
yellow,
is
highlighting
variance
one.
So
that's
the
width
of
the
dry
vial,
it's
being
proposed.
The
proposed
variances
from
6.5
meters
to
6
meters
and
the
green
is
highlighting
variance
2..
That's
a
provision
in
the
zone.
Zoning
bylaw
that
measures
basically
the
length
of
one
parking
space
plus
the
length
of
the
drive
aisle
plus
the
length
of
the
other
parking
space.
On
the
other
side.
I
A
Good
thanks
any
other
committee
members
have
questions
for
the
applicant
or
staff.
I
see
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
809
development
drive.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom,
and
is
anybody
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
809
development
drive?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
third
and
final
call.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
809
development
drive?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand.
A
A
C
E
C
C
C
C
So
here's
the
site
plan
on
the
floor
plan
for
the
proposed
garage,
the
heavy
gray
line,
indicates
the
walls
of
the
existing
house
on
the
drawing
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
screen
and
the
highlighted
yellow
areas
are
subject
to
the
minor
variants.
It's
the
setback
from
the
garage
walls
to
the
lot
line.
C
C
C
A
A
Great
is
there?
Is
there
anything
further
you
wish
to
add
to
the
application
we
have
before
us?
No
there's
nothing
to
add
at
this
point.
Thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you,
so
committee
members,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting?
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
here
that
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
867
woodbine
road?
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and,
as
I'm
looking
at
the
remaining
people
who
are
in
the
meeting,
I
don't
think
we
have
any
other
members
of
the
public.
So
I'll
just
ask
one
more
time.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
867
woodbine
road?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
somnath
and
seconded
by
greg
any
discussion,
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that
is
unanimously
carried.
A
C
C
The
purpose
of
this
application
is
to
reduce
the
minimum
setback
for
a
drive-through
to
reduce
the
required
number
of
parking
spaces
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
and
to
increase
the
maximum
gross
floor
area
in
order
to
further
develop
the
existing
shopping
center
site
by
adding
three
new
buildings
next
slide.
Please.
C
C
C
C
C
The
applicant
has
requested
a
reduced
ratio
of
4.5
spaces
per
100
square
meters.
What
this
works
out
to
is
158
parking
spaces.
This
number
is
supported
by
the
parking
study
that
was
submitted
by
the
applicant.
However,
the
applicant
is
actually
showing
174
spaces
on
the
site
plan.
At
this
time,
they
have
requested
the
lower
number
identified
by
the
parking
study
for
the
variants
to
allow
for
flexibility
in
the
future,
if
needed.
C
Variance.
Three
is
to
reduce
the
minimum
front
yard
setback
from
midland
avenue
for
an
automobile
service
station.
This
is
from
50
feet
to
18
feet.
This
applies
only
to
the
proposed
oil
change
facility
on
the
lot,
and
the
last
variance
is
to
increase
the
maximum
gross
leasable
floor
area
on
the
site
from
2000
square
meters
to
3510
square
meters.
C
C
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Accordingly,
the
owner's
seeking
relief
for
several
minor
variances
to
support
the
continued
development
of
the
shopping
center
to
include
the
automobile
oil
change
operation,
an
expanded
drive-through
facility,
a
restaurant
and
a
building
containing
retail
commercial
uses
along
the
northern
property
line.
Given
that
staff,
the
staff
report
is
very
detailed
and
covered
all
the
relevant
material.
We
have
nothing
for
further
to
add
at
this
time.
Q
I'll
just
conclude
that
we
have
read
the
staff
report
and
are
in
agreement
with
the
staff
zoning
assessment,
along
with
the
staff's
findings,
that
the
requested
variants
are
considered
minor
in
nature
and
are
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
and
use
of
lands
and
building
on
earth
structure.
Furthermore,
the
requested
minor
variants
are
consistent
with
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
the
zoning
bylaw.
Q
We
also
agree
with
staff's
recommendation
for
approval
of
the
minor
variances
to
include
the
four
conditions
outlined,
in
exhibit
a
of
the
staff
report,
and,
additionally,
we
agree
with
staff's
report
that
the
proposed
application
meets
all
the
four
tests
under
section
45
subsection,
one
of
the
planning
act.
So
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
at.
A
I
I
I
thought
I
heard
lindsey
mention
that
the
drive-through
is
at
a
greater
distance
than
50
meters
to
the
closest
residential
housing
that
backs
on
that
property.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
that
that
is
what
I
heard
and
I
really
wasn't
sure
what
the
requirement
is:
50
meters
from
the
closest
part
of
a
drive-through
to
a
zone
that
permits
a
residential
use.
So
I'm
assuming
that
this
building
permits
a
residential
use
and
they're
not
using.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
those
two
points.
Thank
you.
C
This
proposed
drive-through
is
much
more
than
50
meters
away
from
the
nearest
residential
property
and
the
variance
is
based
on
what
we
might
call
a
quirk
to
the
current
zoning
bylaw,
the
c2
zone.
That's
the
zone
that
this
property
is
in.
It's
also
the
zone
both
to
the
north
and
the
south
of
this
property.
C
A
Thank
you
great
thanks
for
that
committee
members.
Do
you
have
any
other
questions
for
staff
for
the
applicant
or
their
agent
and
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
are
any
members
of
the
public
here
with
us
this
evening
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1093
midland
avenue.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
and
I'll
just
ask
one
other
time.
I
think
we're
all
staff
and
applicant
here
is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
1093
midland
avenue.
A
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
I'm
seeing
none
so
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
vincent
seconded
by
jordan.
Any
discussion
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that
would
be
unanimously
carried
thanks
very
much.
Thank
you
good
night
good
night.