►
Description
Committee of Adjustment from July 19, 2021. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/2ToAR83.
A
Well
good
evening
and
welcome
to
our
virtual
committee
of
adjustment
meeting
on
your
screen,
you'll
see
members
of
our
committee
of
adjustment.
Now
behind
the
scenes.
We
have
many
staff
members
with
us
this
evening
and
even
though
you
won't
see
them,
you
will
hear
them
chime
in
from
time
to
time.
Our
secretary
treasurer
is
lindsay
staman
and
our
clerk
is
elizabeth
fawcett,
who
will
be
hosting
the
meeting
and
running
the
zoom
platform
from
behind
the
scenes.
A
Now
the
agenda
and
the
schedules
for
the
meeting
have
been
posted
on
dash
on
the
city's
website
and
if
you
don't
have
those
documents-
and
you
want
like
to
follow
along,
you
might
want
to
access
them
now.
So
we
have
four
agenda
items
this
evening
and
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
the
format
that
I'm
going
to
be
using
to
navigate
through
each
application,
I'll
start
by
introducing
an
application
and
then
I'll
give
each
applicant
or
their
agent
an
opportunity
to
add
anything
further.
A
If
you
are
the
applicant
or
the
agent-
and
you
have
nothing
further
to
add,
then
simply
say
so
next
I'll
invite
members
of
the
committee
to
ask
questions
of
either
the
applicant
or
staff
and
then
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Now
at
that
time,
I'm
going
to
be
inviting
members
of
the
public
to
raise
their
virtual
hand
in
zoom
if
they
have
any
questions
or
comments
in
respect
of
the
application.
A
If
you
do
have
a
question
or
you
wish
to
make
a
comment,
please
don't
expect
an
immediate
answer,
because
it's
during
this
public
portion
of
the
meeting
that
we
will
be
recording
your
questions
and
comments
and
only
after
I
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting.
Will
the
questions
and
comments
be
addressed
by
the
applicant,
their
agent
or
staff
next
I'll
invite
the
applicant
and
or
staff
to
address
the
public
comments,
after
which
I'll
turn
to
the
committee
ask
them
to
make
a
motion
and
then
we'll
deliberate
on
the
application
at
that
time.
A
B
B
Members
of
staff
who
are
joining
us
are
jim
james,
barr,
acting
manager
of
development
approvals,
jason
partridge,
planner,
ashley,
anastasio,
intern
planner,
matthew,
leblanc,
intern
planner,
lindsay
staman,
planner
and
secretary
treasurer
and
julie.
Mccarty
jasmine
will
be
our
host
for
this
evening.
I
would
confirm
at
this
time
we
have
approximately
seven
agents
and
applicants
in
the
meeting,
as
well
as
two
members
of
the
public
in
the
gallery.
A
Very
good
thanks
elizabeth,
so
I'm
now
going
to
call
the
meeting
to
order
at
5
32
pm
and
refer
you
to
the
agenda.
Now
committee
members
you'll
recall
that
an
addendum
was
received
last
week.
That
was
cur
that
corrected
a
duplicate
condition
on
the
morton
street
application
and
it
also
added
a
fourth
file
for
this
evening.
So
the
clerk
confirmed
with
me
that
proper
notice
was
given
for
the
inclusion
of
this
fourth
file,
so
committee
members.
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
A
Okay,
so
no
disclosures
of
the
interest.
There
are
no
delegations
this
evening
and
we
have
no
requests
for
deferral
and
there
are
no
returning
deferred
items.
So
item
number:
eight.
The
first
item
of
new
business
on
our
agenda
is
an
application
for
consent
for
highway
number
38..
So
lindsay.
Can
I
have
you
introduce
this
into
the
record?
Please.
F
G
A
A
G
All
right,
so
do
you
miss
chair.
This
is
an
application
for
33,
21
and
3311
highway
38..
It
coincides
with
file
number
d1008,
2021
and
d1009
20
21.
next
slide.
Please,
the
purpose
and
effect
of
the
two
consent
applications
is
to
sever
off
two
parcels
of
land
at
the
property
located
at
three
three:
two
one
and
three:
three
eleven
highway:
thirty,
eight,
the
seventh
application
for
file
number
d1008,
2021,
we'll
sever.
F
G
One
hectare
parcel
of
land
at
the
northern
part
of
the
property
and
we'll
have
approximately
61
meters
of
lot
of
furniture
along
highway
38..
The
segments
application
for
file
number
d1009
2021
will
suffer
off
another
one-hectare
personal
land
at
the
southern
pressure,
part
of
the
property
and
we'll
have
approximately
61
meters
of
frontage
along
highway
38.
The
retained
lot
will
have
11.51
hectares
of
land
with
62
meters
of
block
frontage
along
highway.
38
next
up
slide,
please.
G
E
F
G
Aerial
view
of
the
property,
it's
south
of
orchard
road
and
north
of
van
order.
Road
next
slide,
please
so
the
d1008
2021
is
the
northern
lot
in
blue
and
the
southern
lot
lot.
Three
is
d1009
2021.
on
advice's
advice
from
staff.
It
was
requested
that
lot
one
of
the
northern
parts
should
be
reshaped
to
make
a
less
irregular
shaped
lot,
and
this
is
also
noted
in
the
notice
of
decision
drawing
that's.
G
G
G
The
cataract
rate
conservation
authority
was
circulated
for
this
application
and
they
have
a
review.
The
two
consent
applications
have
no
objections
towards
the
approval
of
applications
within
the
cataract
conservation
authority.
Review
of
that
application
they
considered
negative
impacts
towards
natural
heritage,
features,
natural
hazards
and
water
quality
protection
in.
G
That
an
environmental
impact
assessment
is
not
needed
to
support
these
consent.
Applications
next
slide.
Please
recommendation
the
requested
consent.
Applications
contain
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
official
plan
and
the
zoning
bylaw
7626.
The
proposal
is
under
section
51,
53
1
of
the
planning
act.
The
two
consent
applications
requested
do
not
require
a
plan
of
subdivision
and
have
regard
to
provisions
of
section
5124.
G
A
H
H
I
I
think
mr
partridge
gave
a
a
solid,
clear
overview
as
to
the
two
applications
before
you
this
evening.
My
only
comment
would
be
that
and,
as
noted
in
the
information
update
provided
by
mr
partridge,
there's
a
slight
change
to
the
lot
one
configuration
on
the
northern
portion
and
that
largely
coincides
with
ensuring
consistency
with
the
regular
shaped
policy
within
the
city's
official
plan
and
ensure
a
greater
setback
from
the
wetland
area
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
A
Thanks
so
just
to
confirm
so
the
the
change
was
to
get
rid
of
the
so
we're
talking
the
most
northerly
lot
to
get
rid
of
the
little
sliver
and
and
sort
of
square
it
off.
Is
that
the
change
absolutely
correct?
Okay,
very
good!
Thank
you!
Okay!
So
committee
members,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
mr
sands?
A
G
A
A
Okay,
good
thanks
very
much.
Okay,
so
I'll
now
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
ask
are
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
3321-3311
highway
38-
and
I
see
mr
farrell
you've
got
your
hand
raised.
So
yes,
please
I'll!
Just
have
you
identify
yourself
by
name
and
address.
D
D
D
D
Now
that
being
said,
I
know
in
the
letters
that
we
submitted
that
are
in
the
application
that
there
was
groundwater
concerns,
I'm
very
tested
with
my
barn
water
at
this
time
of
year,
especially
with
livestock.
My
well
goes
goes
really
shallow,
really,
quick.
In
the
summer
months,
we
are
prone
to
groundwater
contamination
here,
big
time.
If
we
get
heavy
rains,
water
will
turn
brownish.
D
Whatever
is
going
to
impact
the
habitat
out
here,
I'd
like
to
say
this
area,
this
450
meter
stretch
of
road,
my
driveway
is
at
the
top
of
the
hill.
So
to
the
north
of
me
is
a
blind
hill
because
it
drops
severely
at
orchard
road
and
goes
down
the
hill
to
the
south.
It
is
downhill
grade
and
there's
a
turn
when
she
went
under
the
power
lines.
D
If
you
go
a
little
farther
north
towards
van
order,
there
was
even
a
fatality
up
there.
So
it's
a
very
bad
stretch
of
road.
In
my
driveway,
when
I
pull
out
to
go
south
towards
kingston,
I
have
to
run
down
the
side
of
the
road
and
have
to
be
very
careful
getting
into
traffic
depending
on
the
time
of
day
because
of
highway
38
and
the
traffic
has
more
than
doubled.
Since
we
moved
in.
D
If
I
want
to
go
north
at
five
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
I
have
to
travel
south
and
turn
at
van
order
in
order
to
travel
north,
so
it
becomes
a
real
problem.
I
think,
for
public
safety
to
put
three
more
accesses
below
my
driveway
and
when
you're
standing
at
3311,
you
can't
see
my
driveway
at
the
top
of
the
hill,
so
it's
still
quite
steep.
So
that's
the
public
safety
concerns
that
we
had
in
closing.
D
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
not
the
type
of
person
for
telling
people
that
own
their
land
what
they
can
or
can't
do
with
that.
But
I
have
a
real
problem:
when
a
numbered
company
comes
in
and
buys
a
piece
of
property
and
immediately
tries
to
sever
it,
and
I
the
only
reason
is
being
severed
is
for
profit,
so
I
have
a
I
have
an
issue
with
that.
I
don't
think
that's
right.
I
do.
D
I
do
want
to
state
that
the
farm
at
34
39,
which
is
60
acres,
which
runs
on
the
west
side
of
me,
so
34
39,
would
be
north
of
me,
but
his
property.
If
you
look
at
the
the
map,
it's
the
one
running
right
beside
mine
is
62
acres,
that
in
2014
after
we
had
moved
in
there
was
an
application
for
severance
on
that
property
as
well,
and
I
believe
it
was
going
to
be
three
houses
put
in
there.
D
D
I
understand
the
process
of
building
houses,
but
I
strictly
see
this
as
this
is
a
profit,
a
profit
thing
for
somebody,
because
the
property
had
sold
way
over
asking
price
with
houses
that
were
condemned
and
everything.
Now
there
was
a
comment
made,
and
I
this
is
a
question
I
have
for
the
committee.
There
was
a
comment
made
about
the
two
addresses
and
when
I
look
at
it
you
list
33,
21
and
33
11.
now,
33
21,
I
believe,
is
the
original
log
house
from
back
when
the
homestead
was
originally
done.
D
D
now
the
parcel
of
land
sold
as
a
33
acre
parcel
as
one
property,
not
two,
so
I
don't
know
why
it
has
two
addresses
unless
it
was
back
in
the
day
when
they
did,
farms
were
allowed
to
build
a
second
house
on
their
farm.
As
long
as
it
was
a
relative
or
a
farmhand
worked
in
that
or
lived
in
that
house,
and
I
believe
when
the
emery's
originally
owned
it.
D
The
son
al
was
the
one
who
built
the
second
house
on
the
property,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
how
that
happened,
that
there
was
two
houses
on
one
property.
Maybe
somebody
could
answer
that
for
me.
If
that's
why
there
was
two
houses
there.
I
know
originally
the
emery's
lived
in
the
old
log
house
for
a
while,
but
that
hasn't
been
lived
in
since
I've
moved
here,
I'm
not
sure
when
exactly
they
had
left
so
anyway.
D
A
A
B
A
G
Within
the
hydrogeological
report
for
the
well
water,
the
professional
engineer
or
professional
geoscientist
will
have
to
look
at
quality
quantity
and
interference
and
provide
a
report
to
our
environmental
service
division.
For
so
basically,
the
engineer
signs
off
on
the
report
and
then
our
environmental
division
signed
off
on
the
report
as
well.
So
the
what
well
water
is
looked
at
and
it's
only
and
it
must
meet
within
one
year
or
the
consensus.
A
G
In
terms
of
the
driveway
concerns
in
the
notice
of
the
decision,
the
engineering
department
has
reviewed
the
application
and
it
won't
be
three
driveways
the
southern
portion,
the
southern
lot,
so
d1009
2021
we'll
have
to
enter
into
a
private
right
away
with
the
retain
lot.
So
that's
the
center
lot
and
only
two
entrances
will
be
permitted,
and
so
that's
on
the
notice
of
decision
for
the.
G
G
G
The
applicant
has
noted
that
they
will
be
removing
all
structures
on
the
property
and
then
that's
included
in
the
notice
of
decision
under
the
building
requirements
that
the
applicant
must
apply
for
demolition
permits
and
complete
the
permits
before
the
issues
of
the
certificate
can
be
done.
So
they
must
complete
that
first.
A
F
G
They
follow
the
policy
of
the
official
plan
and
the
zoning
by
law.
They
can
sever
a
lot,
however,
there's
other
conditions.
They
must
meet
so
like
minimum
separation
distance,
so
that
takes
into
an
account
of
the
barns
in
the
area,
and
it's
like
that.
A
lot
furnitures
to
keep
separations
stuff
like
that.
So.
C
G
G
A
F
G
C
C
G
D
H
J
Thank
you
through
you,
mr
chair.
I
have
nothing
additional
to
add.
I
was
just
going
to
provide
some
context
that
there
are
existing
smaller
one
to
two
hectare
parcels
in
the
area
that
are
specifically
sized
for
residential,
only
purposes
which
is
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
rural
land
use
designation
in
this
area.
Remember
this
isn't
designated
prime
agricultural.
We
are
in
the
rural
lands
designation,
which
allows
for
limited
residential
development
in
accordance
with
the
two
severance
policy
as
well
as
farming
uses.
A
Okay,
now,
just
on
the
note
of
we
had
a
discussion
earlier
in
our
pre-meeting
today,
I
my
concern
was
we
had
a
numbered
company
that
bought
a
piece
of
property,
and
you
know
we
wanted
to
sort
of
kind
of
drill
down
to
who
are
the
beneficial
owners
of
the
the
shareholders
of
the
company?
Vincent
was
suggesting
that
you
know
that's
important
for
us
to
know
whether
we
need
to
declare
a
pecuniary
interest,
but
mr
farrell
was
suggesting
it
looks
like
a
numbered
company.
A
J
E
Yes,
I'll
I'll
pipe
up,
yeah
jordan
and
I
think
I
was
just
going
to
touch
on
what
james
said
as
well.
Corporation
can
own
land,
and
you
know
on
on
one
hand,
it's
it's
strange
to
not
know
the
name
of
the
company
director.
On
the
other
hand,
it
actually
keeps
us
more
independent
in
the
sense
that
we
don't
know
who
it
is
we're
not
bias
in
any
sense.
When
mr
farrell
spoke
up,
I
think
there
was
many
things
that
he'd
mentioned
that
aren't
aren't
really
relevant
for
the
committee's
consideration.
E
G
So
I
can
answer
that
so
for
consent
applications.
We
look
at
the
zoning,
bylaw
and
official
plan
so
for
the
zoning
by
law.
Each
law
needs
to
meet
a
minimum
requirement
of
what
frontages,
which
they
do,
a
lot
areas
and
the
official
plan
allows
for
each
law
in
a
rural
environment
to
suffer
twice
prior
to
1998,
and
this
is
what
they
are
doing
in
terms
of
that.
It
also.
I
G
A
A
A
It
sounds
like
there
are
some
homes
that
have
been
abandoned
and
haven't
been
there
for
a
while,
and
it's
maybe
you
know,
cleaning
up
some
of
the
land
in
the
area
or
developing
it
when
developed
development
is
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing,
and
I
do
see
that
3311
will
be
retaining
the
bulk
of
the
land,
although
it
seems
to
be
some
of
the
zoning,
I'm
not
sure
if
we
get
into
yeah
the
retained
lands,
I
don't
know
some.
How
much
of
it
is
is
designated?
A
A
100,
I
I
hear
all
of
that
and
I
I
live
in
the
country
myself
on
rural
property
and
I
I
I
echo
those
comments
as
well,
but
we're
still
retaining
the
bulk
of
the
a2
zone.
So
you
know,
hopefully
I
think
you
know
any
smart
and
busy
person
would
use
that
and
continue
on
the
use
of
you
know
for
hobby
farming.
C
A
A
K
Okay,
great,
oh
good
evening,
mr
chair
and
members
of
committee,
this
is
an
application
for
minor
variants.
The
applicant
is
seeking
relief
from
side
yard
and
rear
yard
setbacks,
as
well
as
parking
space
requirements
to
support
the
development
of
a
self
storage
building
at
95.
Terry
fox
drive
next
slide.
Please.
K
K
K
A
I
Please
good
afternoon
or
evening,
my
name
is
mark
tau,
I'm
a
planner
with
ibi
group,
so
we
are
representing
the
owner
and
mr
paul
martens
also,
I
think
in
the
meeting
as
well.
So
he
is
available
to
ask
questions
we
or
answer
questions.
We
didn't
have
any
particular
comments
beyond
the
staff
report,
so
we
are
able
to
answer
questions
if
there
are
any,
though.
I
Answer
three
years,
chair
yeah.
No,
it's
a
certainly
at
first
glance.
It
looks
odd
and
I
think
the
interesting
thing
about
the
way
these
self-storage
units
operate
is
that
there
are
a
few
spaces,
probably
needed
for
people
who
are
coming
to
like
rent
a
unit
for
the
first
time,
and
so
they
would
park
by
the
main
door
go
into
the
office
and
rent
a
unit.
Otherwise
what
the
owners
found
is
that
once
they're
rented
up
pretty
much,
everybody
just
goes
in
and
parks
by
the
units
that
has
external
access.
I
There
are
some
units
that
are
internal
access
only,
and
so
they
would
use
that
shared
parking,
but
we
also
went
back
and
reviewed
all
the
signing
logs
for
the
for
the
existing
self
storage
operation.
That's
there
as
well
as
some
of
the
other
self
storage
operations,
and
so
the
number
of
people
that
would
come
through
the
site
in
a
day
was
very
limited,
like
one
per
hour
kind
of
thing
two
per
hour.
I
A
A
And
are
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
95
terry
fox
drive?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
my
third
and
final
call:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
95
terry
fox
drive?
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
and
I
see
none
so
I'll.
Come
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
so
moved
by
jordan
and
seconded
by
somnath.
A
A
A
F
L
Through
you,
mr
chair,
the
purpose
and
effect
of
this
application
is
to
provide
the
applicant
with
relief
from
the
required
front
and
rear
yard
setbacks,
as
well
as
from
provisions
relating
to
dormers
to
accommodate
the
construction
of
a
new
two-story
dwelling
with
an
attached
garage
next
slide.
Please,
okay,
so
displayed
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen.
Here
is
the
key
map
associated
with
this
application
and
on
the
right
is
the
neighborhood
context
map,
both
of
which
were
taken
directly
from
the
report.
Exhibits
for
reference
next
slide,
please.
L
So
in
order
to
accommodate
the
proposed
redevelopment,
the
applicant
is
requesting
four
variances
in
total,
all
of
which
relate
to
specific
provisions
listed
under
section
6.3
of
bylaw
8499,
so
the
first
variance
is
being
requested
to
reduce
the
minimum
required
front
yard
setback
from
4.5
meters
to
1.2
meters,
and
the
second
variance
is
being
requested
to
reduce
the
minimum
required
rear
yard
setback
from
7
meters
to
5.8
next
slide.
Please.
L
Additionally,
the
proposed
attached
garage,
which
will
be
shown
later
in
this
presentation,
includes
three
partial
dormers,
for
which
the
third
and
fourth
variances
are
being
requested
to
accommodate.
The
third
variance.
Will
be
to
decrease
the
proposed
dormer
setback
from
the
building's
main
front
wall
from
40.6
centimeters
down
to
zero,
and
the
fourth
and
final
variance
is
being
requested
to
increase
the
combined
length
of
all
dormers
from
4.6
meters
to
6.07.
L
L
L
The
east
yard
is
recognized
as
the
rear
yard,
despite
the
fact
that
each
of
these
yards
function
as
side
yards
so
as
mentioned,
the
lot
has
frontage
on
morton
way,
which
is
a
private
road
located
on
the
tet
center
and
isabelle
bader
properties
at
370
and
390
king
street
west,
respectively,
over
which
the
owner
currently
has
a
right-of-way
next
slide.
Please,
so
here
are
the
north
and
south
elevation
renderings
of
the
proposed
dwelling
and
attached
grass.
L
So
for
reference,
the
north
wender
rendering
represents
the
view
of
the
dwelling
from
the
neighboring
property
at
356
king
street
west,
while
the
south
rendering
represents
the
view
from
the
shoreline
of
lake
ontario
next
slide.
Please,
and
finally,
here-
are
the
east
and
west
elevation
renderings
again,
the
east
rendering
for
reference
represents
the
view
from
the
neighboring
property
at
350,
king
street
west
and
the
west,
rendering
at
the
bottom
represents
the
view
from
morton
way.
Next
slide,
please
so
since
morton
way
is
a
private
road.
L
The
purpose
of
this
supplemental
report
is
to,
as
you
said,
correct
a
duplication,
error
and,
aside
from
this,
no
additional
or
revised
conditions
are
being
proposed
at
this
time.
I'll
note
that
the
revised
recommended
conditions
are
attached
to
the
supplemental
report,
as
exhibit
a
and
are
referenced
in
the
notice
of
decision
accordingly.
Next
slide,
please
to
conclude
this
application
is
being
recommended
for
approval.
I
now
hand
it
back
to
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Everyone.
A
I
I
A
I'm
completely
done
as
well
yeah
any
other
committee
members,
no
okay,
so
I'll
open.
The
public
portion
of
the
meeting
are
any
members
of
the
public
with
us
this
evening,
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
nine
morton
way.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
call
number
two,
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
nine
morton
way.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
in
zoom
and
third
and
final
call:
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
who
we
wish
to
speak
to
the
application
for
nine
martin
way?
A
B
A
A
A
Any
discussion
so
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that's
again
unanimously
carried
thanks
very
much.
Thank
you
all
right
and
our
final
application
this
evening
is
number
eight
d,
which
is
an
application
for
minor
variants
for
colborne
street,
so
lindsay.
Can
I
have
you
introduce
that
to
the
record,
please.
F
G
The
resulting
16
unit
residential
in
this
building
will
be
390
square
meters
in
size
and
complies
with
all
minimum
side,
yard,
height
and
landscape,
open
space
requirements
in
the
zone
next
line,
please
so
the
one
of
the
minor
variants
is
for
the
weary
art
setback.
The
requirement
is
5.7
meters.
The
proposed
is
5.9
meters.
590
meters
requested
meters
is
a
total
of
0.11
meters.
G
Next
next
slide,
please
the
subject
property
is
located
between
and
I
believe
it's
montreal
street
on
the
right
next
slide.
Please
here's
the
cycling
of
the
under
construction
property
right
here.
So
what
happened
was
during
the
building
permit
process.
They
were
asked
to
send
an
as-built
survey
and,
upon
review
from
the
planning
department,
was
determined
that
the
rear
yard
setback
did
not
meet
and
we
asked
them
to
do
reminder
variants
to
practice
and
legalize
the
under
construction,
16-minute
residential
building
next
slide.
G
It's
recommendation
requested
variants
and
application
maintains
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
both
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan,
and
the
zoning
by
e-499.
Propose
proposal
is
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land,
building
or
structures
and
the
requested
variances
of
minor
nature.
As
such,
the
proposed
application
detailed
four
tests
under
subsection
forty
five
one
of
the
planning
academic
application,
is
being
recommended
for
approvals
subject
to
proposed
conditions
approval.
This
application
will
allow
for
the
legalization
of
an
existing
under
construction,
16-unit
townhouse
building
on
the
property.
A
D
A
A
I
don't
have
any
as
well,
so
I'll
open
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
or
and
okay.
I
see
no
members
of
the
public
here,
but
I'll
call
anyway
or
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
the
application
for
233
colborne
street.
Please
raise
your
virtual
hand
and
zoom
and
lindsey.
Can
you
confirm
that
there
we
have
nobody
in
the
the
public
realm
here.
A
A
Agenda
so
the
next
item
in
the
agenda.
We
have
no
motions
for
this
evening.
No
notices
of
motions,
there's
no
other
business.
Unless
any
committee
member
wants
to
bring
something
up,
which
I
don't
see
head
shaking.
No
so
no
pieces
of
correspondence,
so
the
date
of
the
next
meeting
is
august,
the
16th
at
5
30
p.m.
We
all
have
that
date.
So
now
we
are
looking
at
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
moved
by
somnath
and
seconded
by
jordan.
Any
discussion
well
all
in
favor
raise
your
hands.