►
From YouTube: Kingston Ontario - Heritage Kingston - June 19, 2019
Description
Heritage Kingston meeting from June 19, 2019. For the full meeting agenda visit http://bit.ly/2M2bqTB
A
Otherwise,
seeing
none
a
mover
for
the
amended
agenda,
Mathieu
seconded
William,
thank
you,
those
in
favor
those
opposed.
Do
you
have
an
agenda?
The
minutes
of
May
the
15th
move
her
to
approve
the
minutes,
somebody
who
was
present
at
the
meeting
done
seconded
by
Bridget.
Thank
you
comments
on
these
minutes
improvements
Corrections,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
motioning
to
approve
those
minutes,
those
in
favor
those
opposed.
They
are
approved,
all
confirmed,
sorry,
pecuniary
interest
in
either
of
the
items
presently
on
the
agenda.
A
A
B
You
so
the
subject
property
everybody.
The
subject:
property
is
on
the
northwest
corner
of
Gore
Road
in
Kingston
Road
15
on
the
east
side
of
the
great
cataract
very
River.
The
property
is
about
18
hectares
in
size.
It
contains
in
1866
once
and
a
half
story,
limestone
former
dwelling
with
a
number
of
historic
names
and
host
the
Hawthorn
Hoffman
cottage.
B
So
in
terms
of
its
cultural
heritage
value,
as
I
mentioned,
it
was
designated
under
part
four
in
2007,
some
of
the
relevant
heritage.
Attributes
from
that
bylaw
include
the
Hawthorn
cottage
itself
and
his
exterior
limestone
construction,
its
main
front
entrance
windows,
etc.
The
traditional
dry
stone
wall,
that's
just
south
of
the
dwelling,
the
evidence
of
historic
gardens
and
agriculture
activities
on
the
property,
as
well
as
its
pathways
and
views
of
the
degree
Karaka
River.
It
has
associated
value
with
United
Empire,
Loyalists
and
farmer.
B
John
Ratan
was
a
Reeve
of
Pittsburg
Township
and
the
property
has
contextual
value.
I
said
is
a
direct
link
to
the
rural
history
of
the
area
and
a
landmark
along
case
Road
15.
So
this
is
the
property,
as
we
know,
the
Hawthorn
cottage
in
yellow
and
the
dry
stone
wall
as
it
exists
today,
just
to
the
south
west
of
it.
B
The
application
before
us
today
is
an
alteration
under
section
33
of
the
Heritage
Act.
It
is
to
gain
formal
Heritage,
Act
approval
for
the
works,
installation,
site
alterations
and
construction
associated
with
the
east
embankment
portion
of
the
third
crossing
bridge
over
the
great
cut
our
River.
The
new
bridge
is
to
cross
the
river
and
connect
John
Callender
Boulevard
in
the
west
to
Gore
Road
in
the
east.
B
The
project
also
requires
the
dismantling
of
this
dry
stone
wall
portion
of
it.
You
see
pictures
of
it
here
before
you.
These
application
is
to
dismantle
store
and
reconstruct
a
16
metre
portion
of
this
wall
to
accommodate
the
the
widening
and
realignment
of
Gore
Road.
So
what
you're
seeing
in
the
bottom
left
is
the
corner
right
next
to
the
Hawthorne
cottage
itself.
B
B
So,
in
terms
of
our
review,
the
the
impacts
onto
this
particular
property
are
easily
our
best
categorize
by
looking
at
the
attributes
that
they
are
affecting
at
the
on
the
property,
and
so
they
categorize
this
the
drawings
to
wall
itself,
the
impacts
and
changes
to
it,
as
well
as
the
overall
cultural
heritage,
value
and
character
of
the
property.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
the
agricultural
remnants,
as
well
as
the
paths
and
lanes
and
the
views
of
the
cataract
River,
are
all
heritage
attributes
of
this
property.
B
B
It
is
a
significant
heritage
after
the
property
built
around
the
same
time
as
the
cottage
in
the
sort
of
mid
1860s,
probably
by
the
same
Mason's,
the
hey
brothers,
that
did
the
house
it
it
likely
was
constructed
to
help
protect
the
the
orchard
and
gardens
that
were
in
the
front
of
this
building.
At
one
point,
according
to
the
applicant's
heritage
impact
statement
and
I
quote
the
surviving
walls
of
this
quality
and
exhibiting
so
fully
their
traditional
vernacular
origins
are
quite
rare.
On
quote
so.
The
original
looks
over.
B
The
original
extent
of
this
wall
has
been
diminished
over
time
and
and
is
reduced
to
only
this.
It's
approximately
55
meters.
Long
now
so,
what's
being
altered,
it's
about
a
quarter
of
the
of
the
remaining
wall
in
order
to
accommodate
the
necessary
widening
with
Gore
Road,
including
the
drainage
swales.
It's
a
small
retaining
wall,
the
proper,
properly
aligned
with
the
intersection
of
Gore,
Road
and
Kingston
were
15
without
impacting
the
neighbors
to
the
south.
B
The
portion
of
this
wall
is
to
be
dismantled.
The
stones
are
to
be
stored
and
then
recreated
recreate
the
60
metre,
long
portion
of
the
stone
wall
at
a
location,
roughly
perpendicular
to
the
existing
wall
and
run
towards
control
15.
The
H
is
the
notes
that
the
proposed
location
of
the
reconstruction
of
the
wall
has
no
historic
origin
and,
even
though
the
wall
will
be
carefully
dismantled
and
document,
some
new
material
will
be
needed,
particularly
in
the
corner
at
the
corner.
B
At
the
elbow
of
the
of
the
turn,
while
it
is
never
desirable
to
from
a
heritage
conservation
perspective
to
permit
the
removal
of
a
portion
of
a
heritage
attribute.
The
third
Crossing
represents
a
monumental
infrastructure
improvement
project
that
will
have
benefits
to
the
growth
of
vitality
of
the
city
of
Kingston
for
generations.
The
impact
of
this
particular
heritage
attribute
must
be
reviewed
against
against
this.
B
The
benefits
that
this
project
will
have
to
the
people
of
Kingston
in
the
future,
the
city,
the
dry,
stone
wall,
while
an
important
character
defining
feature
is
not
the
only
heritage
attribute
on
the
property.
The
landmark
limestone
dwelling
will
not
be
altered
by
this
by
this
improvement
and
and
will
still
be
have
a
presence
on,
but
will
become
a
rather
important
intersection
at
Kingston,
Road,
15
and
Angora
wrote
the
stone
wall.
As
I
noted,
the
alterations
are
limited
to
roughly
one
quarter
of
at
the
current
length.
B
The
remaining
portion
of
the
original
wall
we
assessed
and
restored
or
require
the
new
section
of
the
wall
is
recommended
to
be
built
to
resemble
the
original
to
original
proportions,
but
with
with
any
width
sorry,
but
with
any
recreation,
the
new
material
needed
it
will
be
distinguishable
on
close
inspection
which
does
align
with
standard
nine
of
the
Parks
Canada
standards
and
guidelines.
It
is
recommended
by
the
applicants.
B
Eh
is
that
an
interpretive
panel
be
installed
near
the
stone
wall
in
order
to
provide
historic
history
of
the
wall,
its
construction
type
and
how
it
has
changed
over
time.
This
will
allow
the
public
to
better
understand
the
cultural
heritage
value
of
this
feature
and
its
evolution
and
staff
have
included.
That
is
a
discretionary
condition
of
approval
in
this.
In
this
application.
B
So
going
back
to
this
sketch
here,
you
can
see
the
majority
of
the
construction
of
the
eastern
portion
of
this
embankment
of
the
third
crossing
is
located
on
the
subject
property.
It
will
involve
whole
scale.
Clearing
and
substantial
grading
changes
in
the
work
area
and
I
note
that
at
one
time
the
area
was
considered
a
rural
area,
a
large
active
farms,
look
we're
located
along
Kenneth,
Hingston,
Road
15,
the
subject
property
by
way
of
its
heritage.
Attributes
helps
to
conserve
the
former
real
character
of
this
area.
B
The
Hawthorn
cottage
is
a
good
example
of
a
typical
farmhouse
in
the
mid
19th
century
and
reflects
what
would
have
been
common,
a
common
sight
along
the
rural
areas
of
Kingston
from
the
19th
and
early
20th
centuries,
remnants
of
the
former
orchard
and
former
farm
buildings.
The
grass
yards,
the
wall
itself
and
sloping
property,
overlooking
the
cataract
River
are
all
contributing
factors
that
can
serve
this
culture
heritage
value
while
a
substantial
structure
and
one
that
will
change
this
size
and
configuration
of
the
subject
property.
B
B
Now
why
only
temporary
the
large
staging
area
will
also
have
an
impact
to
this
property?
There's
an
access
road
proposed
in
from
Kent
Road
15,
some
tree
vegetation
removal
is
gonna,
is
planned
to
accommodate
that
and
change
it
to
the
existing
pathways.
Some
impacts.
The
existing
views
of
the
river
will
also
be
impacted
because
of
this,
as
noted,
though,
in
the
designated
vial
of
those
paths
and
use
our
heritage
attributes.
But,
interestingly,
unlike
most
heritage
attributes,
these
have
become
attributes
or
time
and
more
recently,
as
the
property
is
used
for.
B
The
intent
is
to
retain
and
improve
as
many
of
these
pathways
and
viewpoints
as
possible
and
to
reinstate
them
as
needed
in
order
to
conserve
those
those
air
heritage,
attributes
that
the
public
has
has
come
to
expect
on
the
property.
Further,
it's
the
intent
of
the
property
to
formalize
and
make
more
defined
viewpoints
as
on
this
property,
as
well
as
on
the
bridge
itself,
to
to
provide
interpretive
educational
displays
to
help
improve
the
public's
and
experience
an
understanding
of
the
world
heritage
site
and
the
grotto
River.
B
So
all
that
in
mind,
staff
have
looked
at
this.
The
Official
Plan
the
eight
guiding
principles
in
the
province,
as
well
as
the
Parks
Canada
standards
and
guidelines,
and
and
as
well
as
the
submitted
material,
and
that
the
H
is
provided
by
the
applicants
and
their
detailed
drawings
and-
and
we
are
supportive
of
this
application
with
a
number
of
conditions
that
are
outlined
before
you,
the
we
circulate
this
application.
Some
of
the
technical
comments
we
received
building
permit
may
be
required
for
for
the
wall
itself.
B
Forestry
is
asking
for
detailed
on
landscaping,
plan
tree
inventory
and
preservation
plans
as
part
of
this
project.
The
Parks
Department
has
reiterated
that
they'll
be
working
with
the
third
crossing
team
for
parks,
improvements
and
enhancements,
as
well
as
the
multi-use
trail
connectivity
portion
of
the
project.
This
application
was
also
circulated
to
to
the
Heritage
Committee.
Are
those
comments
are
summarized
in
the
agenda?
B
There
was
committee
members
requested
that
the
quote
mitigation
measures
that
were
outlined
in
the
H
is
specifically
those
that
require
regard
or
that
request
documentation
of
the
existing
conditions,
monitoring
and
mitigating
of
any
effects
during
construction
that
those
be
implemented
as
part
of
this
approval
and
staff
have
included
those
as
a
condition
of
approval
in
this
recommendation
and
mr.
chair
would
recommend
approval.
Thank
you.
A
C
Yeah
I
was
somewhat
concerned
about
like
making
sure
that
a
qualified
contractor
would
do
the
work
because
it
there's
not
a
deep
inventory
of
like
those
types
of
walls
of
dry
stone
walls
in
even
the
area
really
and
that
one's
got
a
particularly
notable
cope
at
the
top
is
like
pretty
impressive.
It's
also
very
like
well
done,
including
the
butt
end
of
the
wall.
It's
like
it's
really
tiny
and
a
it's
a
significant
asset.
C
Until,
although
it's
like
well
stated
in
Andres
report,
like
you
can
say,
those
sorts
of
things
but
they're
not
executed
on
then
and
so
I
think
that
needs
to
be
followed
up
with
like
make
sure
that
there's
qualified
contractor
that
does
the
work.
So
I,
don't
know
if
we're
particularly
the
clients
here
or
hatch,
is
doing
it
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
kingston,
but
I
think,
maybe
a
recommendation
to
get
Seavey's
from
the
contractors
or
something
because
typically,
what
happens
in
these
situations?
Is
they
just
get
butchered
and
then
we
lose
it.
B
Mr.
chair
I'm
I'm
happy
to
the
question
on
my
colleague
under
Shimon
who's
here,
working
on
behalf
of
the
third
crossing
team,
but
I
would
note
I,
believe
we've
included
condition.
Four
and
a
recommendation
is
that
the
owner
shall
carefully
select
the
Mason
with
experience
and
documenting
disassembling,
repairing
and
reconstructing
historic
dry
stone
walls
in
order
to
undertake
the
realignment
of
historic
dry
stone
wall
so
I.
B
D
A
D
E
With
all
the
different
features,
the
you
know,
it
has
a
batter
on
it
and
it's
an
angled
wall.
It
has
those
that
wonderful
coping,
the
and
yeah
it's
a
very
particular
beast.
It
has
a
very
there's,
a
traditional
end
of
all
treatment
that
this
one
does
have
at
at
the
at
Gore
Road
right
now
and
that
would
be
transferred
to
the
new
end
of
wall
and
the
the
the
the
the
Mason
who
does.
The
work
would
have
to
know
how
to
make
the
traditional
corner
of
a
dry
stone
wall
too.
E
There
they
don't
always
go
together
either
those
skills
don't
always
go
together
either
so,
but
that
whole
package
is
essential
to
the
responsible
treatment
of
that
wall,
so
just
to
just
to
finish
not
to
go
on
at
finite
them.
But
you
know
the
the
work
at
st.
Mark's,
st.
Mark's.
You
stand
all
the
boundary
walls
at
st.
marks
in
Barry
field
were
dry,
stone
walls
of
sort
of
similar
to
what
we
have
at
ad
gore
and
then
all
gone,
but
then
the
the
ones
that
the
front
have
been
recently.
E
F
Little
more
information
about
I
think
there's
reference
to
a
swale
alongside
the
road
and
do
I
understand
that
this
will
be
a
built-up
area,
a
built-up
mound
sort
of
between
the
new
Gore
Road
and
the
stone
house.
And
if
I
understand
that
that
is
what's
happening.
Of
course
it's
good
and
that
it
would
reduce
vibration
and
so
on
and
noise
in
the
library
from
traffic.
But
if
it's
very
high
swell
means
people
on
Gore,
Road
really
will
not
be
able
to
see
the
stone
wall
or
the
historic
building.
G
Three
Minister
chair
just
in
terms
of
a
page
reference
in
your
package:
it's
Exhibit,
C,
page
25.
You
have
the
cross
section,
drawing
that's
on
the
screen
there
and
the
soil
itself
appears
to
be
an
inverse
will
so
it's
actually
a
depressed
Swale,
so
it
would
not
obstruct
views
to
the
reconstructed
portion
of
the
stonewall.
B
A
H
I
A
J
F
E
The
HIAS
point
of
view
from
the
review
that
that
I
undertook
it
is
recommended
that
there
be
monitoring
undertaken,
so
that
would
involve
as
many
ways
it
can
be
done,
but
certainly
initially
it's
a
sort
of
a
photographic
documentation
of
the
two
built
elements,
so
the
dry
stone
wall
and
the
house
particularly
elements
of
both
interior
and
exterior,
so
that
that
becomes
your
baseline
and
then,
as
the
various
activities
proceed.
There's
some.
E
You
know
consistent
monitoring
going
on
to
see
if
there's
any
effects
such
as
cracking
in
the
stone
cracking
in
the
in
the
interior
wall
plaster
that
wasn't
it
wasn't
there
prior
to
that,
that's
all
you
need
that
baseline
stuff
can
be
done
in
many.
It
can
be
done
in
many
different
ways
and
it
both
high-tech
and
low-tech.
You
know-
and
you
know
where
there
are
where
there
are
existing
cracks-
there
can
be
Telltale's
put
on
those
cracks
to
see
if
they
widened
significantly
during
during
construction
activities,
so
yeah.
C
It's
just
worth
noting
too,
that
it's
probably
the
most
forgiving
like
wall
assembly
for
settlement,
so
I
think
like
if
it
were
to
settle
it
like
just
kind
of
accommodates
it,
it
would
be
unfortunate
and
I
think
like
rather
than
road
or
construction
vibrations.
Your
biggest
problem
will
probably
be
the
fact
that
it's
all
gonna
be
on
disturbed
soil
like
on
the
beginning.
So
unless
it's
coming
down
to
bedrock
anyway,
so
just
to
speak,
your
concern.
E
Well,
I
raised
that
to
the
design
team,
the
Hat
hatch
and
also
at
the
city,
and
they
assured
me
that
blasting
would
not
take
place.
There'd
be
no
blasting,
there's
still
be
hole.
Ramming
they'll
still
be.
You
know.
Heavy
construction
vehicle
vibration,
but
no
blasting,
which
makes
does
make
a
big
difference.
I
appreciate.
I
A
You
thank
you
dump
the
chair
for
a
moment.
Yes,
sir
I
realize
you
a
couple
of
questions.
When
the
World
Heritage
Site
was
declared,
we
realized
that
there
was
no
exact
definition
of
the
boundaries
of
the
site
and
I
certainly
was
at
a
meeting
with
all
of
the
townships
involved
in
the
whole
canal,
which
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
about
that.
Has
it
had
ever
been
defined?
What
is
the
boundary
the
site
boundaries
of
the
World
Heritage
Site.
B
Mr.
chair,
when
we
did
our
recent
update
to
the
official
plan,
we
asked
that
very
question
of
Parks
Canada
and
the
response
we
got
was
the
high-water
mark,
so
the
high-water
mark
on
either
side
of
the
body
of
water
and
then
the
South
causeway
at
the
South
End
causeway,
not
being
part
of
it,
but
the
edge
of
that,
and
so
the
about
the
mitigation
and
the
management
plans
for
the
World
Heritage
Site
also
included.
B
B
A
A
One
of
the
points
of
the
dry
stone
walls
was
that
they
were
built
so
that
they
could
be
easily
moved
when
you
suddenly
wondered
what
a
gateway
through
it.
The
farmer
did
not
have
to
break
up
concrete
and
cement
and
everything
so
there's
nothing
particularly
new
in
making
the
change,
not
that
that
means
you
don't
take
all
the
possible
care.
K
In
terms
of
timing,
if
the
wall
is
to
be
dismantled
and
rebuilt,
or
at
least
a
portion
of
it,
there
is
no
statement
of
time
I
mean.
Is
it
going
to
be
dismantled
and
immediately
put
back
up
before
the
rest
of
the
construction
is
done?
Is
it
going
to
be
done
at
the
end,
once
everything
is
planted
and
dusted
and
put
back
to
the
way
that
it's
supposed
to
be?
That's.
K
E
Yeah
I
think
the
answer
to
that.
Although
you're
right
I
mean
there's
been
no,
you
know
because
there's
no
construction
schedule,
it
hasn't
been
actually
indicated
exactly
you
know.
Obviously
it
should
be.
You
know
it
should
be
recorded
and
dismantled
before
any
activities
take
place
and
and
be
well
recorded
and
and
I
think
it
should
be
retained.
E
Are
the
the
stones
should
be
retained
on
site
but
in
a
very
safe
manner,
on
pallets
and
cetera,
et
cetera
and
and
then
reconstruction
construction
reconstruction
also
restoration,
because
we're,
including
the
restoration
of
other
portions
of
the
wall,
including
that
section
near
the
the
library
itself,
which
has
never
been
sort
of
up
to
scratch?
That
would
that,
to
my
mind,
should
be
should
be
done
once
all
the
construction
activity
is
really
completed.
K
A
A
A
Construction
may
be
the
best
word
that
it
that
the
wall
be
demolished,
may
all
be
taken
down.
Yeah
disassembled,
as
I
was
a
tree
trunk
before
heavy
construction
start
and
not
be
reassembled
until
heavy
construction
is
complete,
and
should
that
be
an
extra
clause
or
can
it
go
on,
for
which
would
you
prefer?
Does
it
matter
through
it's
an
extra
clause
then,
as
probably
a
seven
you've
got
that
down,
then.
D
L
L
E
There's
a
1969
image,
the
it's
the
Ordnance
Survey,
so
it's
very
meticulously
done.
It
includes
the
property
there's
a
little
snippet
of
it
in
my
heritage
impact
statement
that
covers
the
property
and
it
seems
to
show
the
wall
it's
hard
because
a
lot
of
the
line
weights,
at
least
in
the
versions
that
we
have
we
have
now-
are
a
little
hard
to
discern
because
you
get
topographic
information
plus
you
get.
E
If
you
will
of
the
of
the
house
so
but
but
that's
the
image,
if
you
want
to
refer
to
it,
I
mean
that's
the
earliest
image
and
it's
quite
early
because
the
surveys
were
done
for
this
were
done
in
1866
to
1868,
and
this
map
is
dated
1869
and
the
house
is
supposedly
sort
of
1866.
You
know
sort
of
right
in
there.
So
thank
you.
A
A
A
And
also
that
this
remain
in
effect
for
five
years
normally
motions
passed
here
are
good
for
three
years.
I,
if
you're
doing
work
on
your
house
and
you
get
approval.
You
need
to
do
that
work
within
three
years
because
of
the
complexity
of
this
project.
There
is
a
recommendation
that
the
current
bylaw
be
amended
so
that
this
stays
in
effect
for
five
years.
A
So
if
I
can
have
a
mover
of
the
motion
as
printed
move
by
Williams
seconded
by
Zoe,
thank
you
and
the
proposed
amendment,
which
I
think
came
from
from
Zoe.
Is
that
wording
up
good
for
you
in
red?
Well,
that's
neat
that
the
disassembling
of
the
wall
be
completed
before
any
heavy
construction
work
is
started
that
the
stones
we
kept
on
site
and
that
the
wall
be
reassembled
when
heavy
construction
is
complete,
move
by
Zoe
seconder
for
Jeremy.
A
F
Like
to
another
minor
amendment,
I
think
we've
had
a
discussion
about
how
important
it
is
that
the
Mason
in
charge
of
really
of
the
war
is
well
qualified
and
I.
I.
Think
the
wording
in
Sector
part
4
is
is
really
not
quite
adequate.
It
says
the
owner
shall
carefully
select
well,
the
owner
can
still
select
anybody.
They
want
so
I
think
I'd
like
to
make
a
change
so
that
it
would
read
the
owner
shall
select
to
the
satisfaction
of
heritage
planning
staff,
a.
M
F
F
F
A
Okay,
so
the
amendment
moved
by
done
that
in
number
three,
the
owner
shall
select
a
Mason
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
Heritage
planning
staff
with
experience
to
etc.
Is
there
a
seconder
for
that
William?
Thank
you.
Discussion
on
that
amendment
done.
You
probably
made
your
point
before
seeing
no
further,
those
in
favor
of
the
amendment
to
Clause
3
those
opposed
that
is
carried
further
amendments
to
the
motion,
then,
as
on
the
screen,
with
two
amendments.
Looking
for
remover
of
the
amended
motion,
Mathieu
and
seconder
Jeremy.
Thank
you
discussion.
A
O
A
A
A
D
A
Thank
you
for
that.
We'll
just
wait
for
Matthew
to
come,
and
what
we've
put
up
on
the
screen
to
avoid
a
complicated
procedural
movement
is
to
have
left
the
amended
motion
in
three,
but
added
that
same
words
where
originally
we
intended
didn't
to
be
in
four,
and
thank
you
was
that
done.
Who
pointed
that
out
that
we
put
it
in
the
wrong.
O
Consequence
of
leaving
it
in
there
is
that
you've
actually
relieved
the
city
of
all
obligation
to
mitigate.
If
you
read
the
word,
you've
assigned
that
to
the
Mason
and
the
Mason
has
no
authority
within
the
construction.
So
the
reason
it
should
be
assigned
to
the
owner
that
the
owner
directly
ensures
mitigation
occurs.
O
A
A
A
A
D
So
what
we
can
do
here
is
a
motion
to
amend
whereby
we
will
delete
the
wording
we
added
in
Clause.
Three,
all
the
words
in
red
will
be
deleted
and
then,
as
part
of
that,
the
wording
in
red
in
clause
4
will
be
added.
So
it's
to
undo
what
we
did
10
minutes
ago
and
add
the
wording
in
for
now
before
we
do
anything
else.
We
should
see
if
there's
any
other
parts
of
this
that
wish
to
be
amended
at
this
time.
So
we
don't
have
to
go
back
again
and
I.
Think
mr.
chair
yeah.
A
C
O
A
D
A
A
A
B
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
so
this
application
is
nine
Wellington
Street,
it's
at
the
southeast
side
of
Wellington
Street
between
West
and
lower
Union
streets
in
the
old
Sydenham
Heritage
Conservation
District.
The
property
contains
the
north
half
of
a
two
and
a
half
story,
brick
semi,
detached
dwelling
that
was
constructed
in
1879,
which
shares
the
property.
B
So
the
building
is
the
left
on
your
screen
left
half
of
this
semi
in
terms
of
the
cultural
heritage,
value
of
the
property
it
is
in
the
it
is
designated
under
part
five
as
part
of
the
district
and
it's
in
the
north
baguette
sub
area
of
the
plan.
Both
the
district
and
the
sub
Barrie
have
their
own
heritage
attributes.
So
we've
listed
some
of
the
applicable
ones
here,
including
the
varying
ages
and
styles
and
types
of
buildings
in
the
area.
B
The
compact
scale
of
the
street
and
the
building
heights
and
setbacks
vernacular
buildings
in
this
particular
sub
area
are
predominant
and
views
of
the
city
park,
especially
at
the
terminus
of
Wellington
Street,
are
important
character.
Defining
elements
of
this
part
of
the
district.
The
building
is
noted
as
a
significant
building
to
the
district
and
the
building
itself
through
it,
the
inventory
list,
a
few
noted
features,
including
the
one-story
bay
window,
with
the
flat
roof
and
play
entablature
the
paired
windows
top
with
solid
ashlar
hoods
that
are
slightly
arched.
B
The
pair
of
rectangular
windows
with
simple
wood
surrounds
on
the
second
story
and
the
inner
Bay's
that
are
slightly
projected
that
contain
the
entrances.
So
this
is
a
close-up
of
the
view
of
the
property
from
at
bird's
eye.
So,
as
I
said,
the
building
is
on
the
left
of
this
semi.
Here's
a
close-up
of
the
building
and
the
side
of
it,
which
the
entrance
on
the
side
will
become
part,
is
part
of
this
application.
B
The
applicants
also
proposed
to
remove
two
windows
in
the
basement
level
and
two
doors,
one
on
the
on
the
front.
Elevation
of
one
on
the
side
elevation,
the
the
windows
in
the
basement
lover,
our
vinyl
sliders
they're,
proposed
to
be
installed
with
new
metal,
clad
wood,
casement
style
windows
painted
white.
The
new
windows
will
be
designed
with
a
for
pane
glazing
pattern
with
arched
tops
to
resemble
a
period
appropriate
window
in
discussion
with
staff.
The
applicants
have
agreed
to
consider
as
an
option.
B
Double
casement
windows
with
arch
tops
that
would
pay
tribute
to
the
original
windows
on
the
pattern
of
the
building.
In
terms
of
the
two
doors
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
replace
them
with
metal,
clad
wood,
sash
windows
of
a
similar
size
to
ones
that
are
on
the
front
of
the
building,
with
a
lower
decorative
spandrel
panel
made
of
wood
to
retain
the
existing
opening
sizes.
So
plans
are
attached
to
your
agenda
package
in
terms
of
our
review.
B
The
concrete
existing
concrete
porch
is
not
a
historically
appropriate
and
does
not
contribute
to
the
character
of
the
building
or
the
district,
and
its
removal
is
supported.
Section
4,
3
or
the
district
plan
recommends.
The
portrait
should
replicate
period-appropriate
porches
conveniently
enough.
The
building
next
door
appears
to
have
its
original
porch
it.
The
district
plan
discourages
use
to
fiber
glass
or
plastic
replicas.
B
A
number
of
the
committee
members
responded
suggesting
that
the
applicant
should
consider
replicating
the
porch
next
door
and
I
understand
the
long-term
intent
is
to
do
that,
but
currently
the
the
porch
is
quickly
that
is
quickly
deteriorating
in
the
applicants
wish
to
provide
a
safe
means
of
egress
for
for
his
tenants
and
and
will
construct
the
wants
to
construct
just
the
bottom
portion
of
this
porch.
At
this
point,
with
with
a
goal
to
do
the
upper
portion
at
a
later
date.
B
Section
5
3
2
of
the
district
plan.
Is
these
a
window
policy
section?
The
intention
is
to
replace
the
two
windows
and
one
door
on
the
front
and
one
door
on
the
side.
Again.
The
windows
on
the
neighboring
property
7
Wellington
up
on
the
basement.
You
can
see
them
in
the
bottom
right
of
your
screen
appear
to
be
the
original
case
of
Windows
for
this
for
this
row
and
the
applicants
are
encouraged
to
to
replicate
that
design
as
best
as
they
can.
B
However,
the
the
change
in
grade
over
time
of
this
building
has
reduced
the
length
of
these
windows
so
making
it
replicating
the
original
size,
difficult
and
impractical.
The
owner
intends
to
remove
the
infill.
You
can
see
in
the
picture
of
the
top
right,
the
infill
that
has
been
done
around
those
these
windows.
The
applicant
wish
to
remove
that
to
re,
reopen
the
original
opening
size
and
install
windows
that
are
fit
appropriately
within
that
opening
size
with
in
the
district
plan
allows
simulated,
divides
and
metal
clad
wood
windows.
B
The
owner
is
considering
as
an
alternative
to
the
one
case
of
window,
with
our
top
a
double
casement
window.
With
our
tops
to
pay
tribute
to
those
windows
next
door
and
on
staff
have
built
that
into
the
recommendation.
The
proposed
alterations
to
the
basement
windows
is
a
great
improvement
from
what
exists
currently
and
complies
with
the
district
plan
in
terms
of
the
two
doors
they
currently
don't
provide.
B
Egress
from
the
building
the
in
they're
treated
as
windows
and
the
owner
intends
to
retain
and
conserve
the
existing
openings
as
they
are,
and
in
response
to
comments
from
the
committee
members,
they
the
side
window
the
wanting
to
see
on
the
left.
They
will
not
be
reducing
the
length
of
the
day,
opening
they're
going
to
retain
it
from
an
authenticity
perspective.
B
Certainly
replacing
the
inappropriate
altered
doors
with
period-appropriate
doors
is,
is
the
most
desirable
and
one
committee
members
suggested
that
a
half,
glazed,
half
paneled,
fixed
door
in
place
of
the
windows
and
in
lower
panel
is
proposed,
as
proposed
for
the
two
openings
and
staff.
Of
course,
staff
support
this
recommendation.
However,
the
owner
wishes
to
proceed
with
their
plans
to
install
the
sash
windows
of
similar
length
to
those
on
the
front
of
the
building
and
and
use
a
removable.
B
Infill
bottom
portion
of
wooden
bottom
portion
panel
that'll
be
painted
to
match
the
trim
of
the
other
on
the
building,
as
the
original
openings
will
remain
unchanged.
New
doors
could
be
installed
in
the
future
and
without
the
second-story
and
the
porch,
or
the
steps
on
the
side
of
the
building
had
doors
hanging
in
midair
seem
inappropriate
and
appear
out
of
place.
B
So,
in
summary,
the
proposed
alterations
will
improve
the
appearance
of
the
subject
property
and
will
not
detract
from
heritage
attributes
of
the
plot
of
the
property
or
the
district,
and
we
reviewed
this
against
our
the
provincial
eight
guiding
principles.
The
district
plan
had
the
city's
official
plan
and,
of
course,
the
standards
and
guidelines
from
Parks
Canada.
We
also
circulated
this
day
application
building
staff.
Note
that
there's
a
building
permit
required
engineering
reminds
the
owner
that
they
are
not
to
encroach
into
the
city.
B
Road
allowance
with
the
new
porch
and
Kingston
hydro
has
reminded
the
owner
that,
if,
if
there
cannot
keep
a
safe
distance
from
the
hydro
lines
that
they
will
need
a
a
confinement
of
the
lines
so
when
we
did
circulate
this
through
committee
and
your
comments
are
summarized
in
in
the
agenda
and
one
the
where
a
number
of
design
suggestions
for
the
new
porch,
including
larger
posts
and
perhaps
turned
pickets
as
opposed
to
the
square,
and
we
have
no
objection
to
that,
we've
included
those
as
again
discretionary
conditions
for
the
applicants
consideration
in
mr.
chair.
A
K
First
I
have
a
question:
I
believe
if
I'm
correct
that
this
property
was
previously
for
sale
and
did
not
sell.
Is
that
correct?
No,
no
idea?
Okay,
based
on
that
assumption,
because
I
was
fairly
certain
that
when
I
saw
it,
I
remembered
seeing
a
for
sale
sign
out
in
front
of
it.
The
aesthetic
changes
that
I
imagined
the
owner
is
proposing
is
likely
in
order
to
actually
sell
the
building,
rather
than
restore
the
building.
I.
B
F
Guess
I
am
really
rather
disappointed
where
this
is
going.
This
is
a
very
nice
house.
It
would
be
wonderful
if
it
were
improved
that
you
know
the
intention
of
the
district
plan
and
and
guidelines
is
to
provide
guidance
and
advice
on
maintaining
and
improving
property
and
I
think
between
the
guidelines.
F
Members
of
this
committee
heritage
staff,
it's
quite
clear
what
should
be
done
on
this
property,
but
the
outcome
of
the
actual
recommendations
is
basically
they
can
do
what
they
want
and
that's
to
me,
that's
disappointing
as
the
same
now,
I
think
we
are,
this
committee
is
not
being
in.
The
past
has
not
been
unreasonable
in
forcing
owners
to
do
expensive
and
so
on,
work
and
I
guess.
This
is
a
good
illustration
here.
F
F
What
should
be
done
is
they
should
be
rebuilt
to
match
the
ones
in
the
other
half
of
this
building
yeah
the
grounds
that
was
changed,
but
an
hour's
work
was
a
shovel
with
lower
Z
would
open
the
space
to
allow
the
original
to
be
done
and
I
think
most
owners
of
landlords
would
like
to
have
more
light
into
their
basement.
So
I
think
that's
a
very
be
very
reasonable
to
require
the
original
basement,
openings
and
windows
that
match
the
ones
that
are
next
door.
F
F
P
P
C
Think
all
those
concerns
are
super
valid.
It
seems
to,
though,
like
you
know,
they're
not
doing
any
irreparable
damage
to
the
building
like
to
the
core
of
the
structure
which
is
nice
and,
like
you
know,
the
typical
life
span,
even
an
aluminum,
clad
wood
sash
window,
if
you're
lucky
you're
gonna
get
30
years
out
of
it
so
like
there
is
a
timeline
to
those
which
is
a
bummer,
because
you
have
to
look
at
it
for
30
years,
but
you
know
they're
already
getting
the
best,
the
worst
anyways
they're
getting
aluminum
clad
wood
windows.
C
So
you
know
I,
think
on
that
grounds,
and
we
haven't
seen
an
example
of
what
that
panels.
Gonna
look
like,
but
I
mean
it's
pretty
typical,
probably
like
something
with
the
sill
for
the
window
to
sit
on
with
the
thing
and
I
don't
know.
Sometimes
it
seems
ownerís,
like
kind
of
like
what
Don
was
saying
about
the
porch.
You
know
it's,
you
can't.
You
can't
ask
these
people
to
spend
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
the
porch,
because
I
look
at
the
porch
next
door
and
that's
what
you're
looking
at
it.
C
So
you
know
these
sorts
of
things,
I.
Think,
like
that's
what
I'm
thinking
in
my
head,
you
know
like
they're,
taking
an
interest
in
taking
care
of
the
property
they're,
putting
in
a
stopgap
solution
for
the
porch,
something
there
I,
don't
know,
that's
what
I'm
thinking
yeah
no
to
discredit.
But
you
know
they
are.
You
know
they're
not
putting
vinyl
windows
in
which
is
nice,
so
anyways,
okay,.
A
A
C
D
D
F
O
A
A
But
what
the
mandate
for
for
Derek
to
write-
and
there
myself
to
approve
this
report
does
not
say
is-
it
does
not
include
work
that
Ryan
and
his
department
have
done,
which
does
not
reach
this
committee
and
that's
a
huge
amount
of
work
and
I
talk
privately
with
Ryan
about
this
and
we're
wondering
if,
in
the
future
and
councillors,
you
may
take
note
of
this
if
there
is
some
way
of
rewording,
the
by
law.
That
says
that
committees
have
to
report
that
it's
not
just
a
work
that
actually
goes
on
at
this
table.
A
A
M
Think
through
you,
I
I
just
want
to
raise
an
issue
that
has
been
brought
several
times
before
this
committee
for
consideration.
There
is
currently
no
member
of
this
committee,
who
is
sitting
on
the
cultural
heritage
working
group
and
we've
had
a
great
deal
of
attrition
in
that
working
group
over
the
last
several
weeks
months.
M
This
group
has
approved
now
the
work
plan
for
that
working
group,
which
you
saw
was
intense
and
the
amount
of
items
that
are
on
it
that
need
to
be
covered
so
I'm,
just
I,
guess
making
a
plea,
not
if
you
and
as
individuals
are
not
able
to
sit
respectfully
of
your
time
and
other
commitments,
but
if
you
could
use
your
position
perhaps
to
consider
sharing
with
others
that
you
know
have
interests
in
this
sector
and
whether
or
not
they
might
be
interested
in
joining
the
working
group.
This
isn't.
Actually
you
see
in
the
notes.
M
A
Not
just
you
it's
with
an
interest
in
that
area.
Your
email
is
City,
email,
easy
to
get
in
touch
with
and
part
of
your
job
before
July
is
to
troll
for
new
members.
Excellent.
Thank
you
for
mentioning
that
any
questions
any
any
of
those
reports.
Then
emergency
approvals
need
a
motion.
Sorry
just
to
approve
committee,
all
three
at
once
a
motion
then
to
approve
the
three
working
group
reports
move
by
dawn
seconded
by
a
Jane.
A
A
Do
you
formal
motion
to
thank
break
for
all
the
work,
help
that
he's
given
us
move
by
John
Taylor
seconded
by
Councillor
Doherty,
those
in
favor,
good
I,
don't
have
to
say
anybody
against.
Thank
you
so
much
for
well
I've
watched
one
I've
been
on
the
committee.
All
that
the
the
work
that
you've
done,
the
the
new
ideas
that
you've
brought
in
and
I'm
sure
Ryan
is
hoping
he
gets
half
as
good
a
successor
yeah.
So
thank
you
and
good
luck.
Thank
you.
It's
been
my
pleasure.
Thank
you
indeed.
A
Then
twelve
visits
and
I
just
hope
that
you
have
read
these
this
letter
carefully,
because
and
I
would
thank
Don
and
the
finless,
and
maybe
you
could
carry
on
the
thanks
to
the
Finley's
for
a
really
carefully
worded
comment
on
the
proposed
revisions
to
the
Heritage
Act.
It
was
a
very,
very
difficult
thing
to
do
because
it
was
so
amorphous
what
the
government
put
out
and
I
read
about
10
different
criticisms
and
comments
on
it
and
I
think
he
went
down
to
some
really
simple
points
which
affect
Kingston
in
particular
and
I.
I
Be
asking
Greg
to
do
this
if
he
wasn't
leaving
tomorrow,
but
bill
108
has
a
lot
of
impacts
on
planning
and
on
heritage,
and
some
of
them
aren't
really
clearly
defined
yet
so
at
some
point
in
time.
I
think
a
briefing
both
to
this
committee
and
to
the
planning
committee
on
what
the
potential
impacts
of
108
are
would
be
really
helpful.
Some
of
it
is
left
in
the
purview
of
council
to
choose
whether
we
want
to
change
okay.