►
From YouTube: Kingston, Ontario - City Council - June 16, 2020
Description
City Council meeting from June 16, 2020. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3hBR29e
A
Okay,
I
good
evening,
everybody
say:
go
Amy
Buju
in
do
watch
a
quake
way
as
the
mayor,
the
city
of
kingston.
I
offer
these
words
in
the
spirit
of
this
gathering
the
spring
our
good
minds
and
hearts
together
as
one
to
honor
and
celebrate
these
traditional
lands
as
a
gathering
place
of
the
original
peoples
and
their
ancestors
who
are
entrusted
to
care
for
mother
earth
since
time
immemorial.
A
B
A
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands,
so
you
will
continue
on.
We
have
no
presentations
this
evening,
but
we
do
have
two
delegations.
First
Jeanette
Lauren
resident
will
appear
before
council
to
speak
to
new
motion
number
two
with
respect
to
the
quiet
street
implementation
and
just
reminder
to
our
delegations
that
you
have
five
minutes.
So
now
you
have
the
floor.
D
D
I
really
appreciated
all
your
questions
and
the
discussion
that
said
it
came
about
really
helped
to
further
refine
this
idea
hone
in
on
what
was
happening
elsewhere
and,
most
importantly,
it
sparked
a
larger
conversation
with
an
informal
networks
of
people
in
groups
who
see
the
potential
value
of
this
idea
next
slide
and
I
guess
actually
the
next
slide.
Sorry
after
that,
so
it's
it's
been
a
really
exciting
month.
D
So
I
just
want
to
speak
to
the
qualities
of
this
motion
that
I
think
are
smart
for
several
reasons:
I,
it's
a
workable
motion.
It's
based
on
local
context
and
resources.
It's
achievable.
It's
really
exciting,
to
see
how
community
engagement
can
add
capacity
and
then,
obviously
the
argument
is
strong.
D
So
last
time,
I
present,
if
I
shared
these
two
databases
and
what's
really
interesting-
is
that
in
coming
more
familiar
with
with
this
issue
and
reading
more
its,
it
sort
of
become
clear
to
me
that
the
bigger
cities
have
really
been
better
poised
to
quickly
implement
more
robust
plans
and
earlier
on.
So
what
I
can
gather?
D
There's
some
budgetary
and
capacity
challenges
that
make
it
difficult
for
smaller
cities
like
Kingston
to
do
the
same
to
the
same
extent,
and
so
for
me,
that's
what's
really
excite
about
this
motion
is
that
Kingston
could
be
an
important
example
for
other
cities
and
how
a
community-based
approach
can
be
very
productive
during
these
times,
which
just
underscores
the
value
of
engagement
during
normal
times.
So
the
way
that
Kate
has
worked
with
city
staff
over
the
years,
how
its
shown
leadership
developed
strong
reputation
within
the
city.
It
all
makes
this
motion
practical,
very
specific
to
Kingston.
D
So
really
it's
the
working
in
good
faith,
part
between
cake
out
in
the
city,
that's
special
and
notable,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
share,
come
back
and
share
that
as
a
citizen
I'm
really
pleased
how
this
is
taken
off
and
I'm
personally,
looking
forward
to
working
with
cake
hat
on
on
building
quiet
streets.
Thank
you.
C
D
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that
question.
I
I.
Definitely
think
that
there
are
lots
of
lessons
learned
about
how
to
do
the
work,
and
especially
in
this,
with
respect
to
this
motion.
I
I,
don't
know
the
intricacies
of
the
working
arrangements
for
other
cities
and
and
I
think
I
mentioned
last
time.
That
I
think
that
that
will
become
more
apparent
as
time
goes
on,
like
what
the
arrangements
are.
But
as
far
as
I
know,
this
is
the
first
like
formal
arrangement
as
a
as
an
example
with
the
community.
E
Thank
You
Orsha
is
your
worship,
Thank
You
Jeanette,
for
your
dedicated
work
in
this
regard,
so
this
I've
got
questions
about
as
something
that's
in
the
motion
you
may
or
may
not
be
familiar
with
it.
I
need
to
ask
you
if
you
know
anything
about
it,
so
cause
six
Jews
delegated
authority
to
staff.
Just
you
know
or
suspend
the
program
Pilate
exactly
what
it
says.
Is
the
transportation
services
department
be
granted
delegated
authority
to
suspend
limit
or
expand
this
program
as
safety
reviews
or
resources
permit
through
2020
know
about
that
clause?
E
D
I
I'm
sure
Roger
Healey
who's
who's
going
to
be
doing
a
delegation
after
me
be
able
to
speak
to
this
Furley
but
further,
but
just
quickly,
I
I
think
it
sort
of
speaks
to
the
pilot
Ness
of
this
motion.
So
you
know
that's
sort
of
the
beauty
of
it
where
the
final
say
is
still
held
within
the
city.
So
essentially
it
means
that
it
can
be
dialed.
The
work
can
be
dialed
back
or
dialed
up,
depending
on
how
things
go.
D
D
I'm,
assuming
so
there's
I,
you
know
that
I
think
that
that
just
means
that
you
know
given
the
conditions
of
winter,
that
sigh
you
know,
they're,
not
the
plows,
aren't
gonna
be
stuck.
You
know,
working
around,
you
know
temporary
installation,
so
I
think
it's
the
cleanup
clause,
but
you
know
obviously
there's
there's
literature
to
suggest
how
designs
can
be
made
to
support
this
type
of
infrastructure
into
the
winter,
particularly
coming
out
of
Montreal.
D
A
F
If
your
worship
I
threw
you
I,
have
one
question
for
the
delegation
thanks
so
much
for
the
presentation.
I
already
have
one
Street
that
wants
to
put
his
name
forward
to
be
considered
a
quiet
street,
so
I
just
wondered
if
this
passes
tonight.
What
is
the
process?
Do
councillors
submit
the
street
like
I'm
staff
or
to
k-kat,
or
just
somebody
from
this
street?
You
know
like
I'm
a
resident
a
representative
resident.
Did
they
submit
it
like
what
would
be
the
next
step
that
this
passes
tonight.
D
A
G
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
greetings
to
council.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
this
I
wanted
to
first
of
all
mention
that
there
are
two
other
members
of
k-kat
on
the
line
have
prepared
to
answer
some
questions,
and
so
I
am
speaking
so
there
in
the
background
there
and
listening
to
what
goes
on
so
were
the
title
is
creating
safe
spaces
for
active
mobility
and
I'll.
G
We
were
started
as
a
Community
Coalition
in
2008
and
and
that
was
made
up
of
city
staff
and
and
health
unit,
Public
Health
unit
staff
and
members
from
Queens
and
members
from
the
public,
and
that
started
in
as
I
said
in
2008
we've.
Our
aim
was
to
promote
active
transportation
in
Kingston
and
and
to
be
an
advocate
on
policy
infrastructure,
programming
and
we'd
been
very
active,
including
we.
G
The
first
thing
we
started
was
an
act
of
living
charter
that
was
in
2009
we're
quite
involved
in
the
Williamsville
Main
Street
study
that
was
into
2012-2013
the
Kingston
transportation
master
plan
was.
It
was
a
big
thing
in
2015,
waterfront
master
plan,
the
age-friendly
advisory
committee
and
then
last
but
not
least,
the
active
transportation
master
plan,
which
was
in
2017
2018
and
then
the
act
of
transportation
implementation
plan
which
was
started
in
2019.
G
So
so
we've
been
active
throughout
that
as
participants
in
the
studies
and
what
I've
got
listed
next
is
the
princess
Street
Promenade,
and
that
was
something
that
we
we
were
certainly
helpful
to
get
it
started
and
has
turned
out
to
be
a
very
successful
thing.
Finally,
the
eastern
on
it
we
were
all
set
to
host
the
Eastern
Ontario
act,
active
transportation
summit
and
it
was
cancelled.
It
was
supposed
to
be
held
in
early
June,
so
so
there
we
go,
but
k-kat
so
Kangana
has
been
quite
involved.
Think
thanks
for
the
Derek
next
slide,
please.
G
G
In
this
time
we
we
need,
so
we
noticed
the
need
for
adequate
space
on
our
streets,
and
we've
also
noticed
a
lot
of
novice
and
young
cyclists
and
walkers
and
scooters
and
everything
and
they
need
protection
on
our
on
our
streets
and,
of
course,
the
last
thing
is:
we've
noted
that
there's
been
a
limited
capacity
for
kingston
transit
to
to
provide
access
to
essential
services
and
jobs.
Okay,
next
slide,
please.
So
what
is
being
proposed
is
that
we
focus
initially
on
on
central
Kingston
to
align
the
new
street
modifications
to
the
downtown
core.
G
So
it's
very
important
that
we
have
a
link
to
the
downtown
core,
Street,
redesigns
and
and
but
throughout.
We
will.
We
will
hope
to
designate
corridor
routes
that
connect
neighborhoods
to
key
destinations,
while
still
allowing
for
proper
physical
2-meter
physical
distancing.
And
these
things
will
look
like
there.
There
will
be
temporary
barricades
and
signs
to
encourage
slow
and
local
traffic
and
I
have
a
photo
of
an
example
and
they're.
G
We
mainly
just
want
to
be
able
to
alert
motorists
that
they're
entering
a
shared
space.
So
next
slide,
please
so
we've
we've
set
up
a
executive
team
and
we
will
the
question
was:
we
will
have
consultation
with
stakeholder
groups
neighborhood
associations,
then
we
will
select
some
candidate
streets,
they
will
be
reviewed
by
staff
and
then
we
will
engage
in
consultation
with
the
with
the
staff
with
the
neighborhoods
and
that's
that's
pretty
much
the
plan
and
all.
A
I
I
Considerable
amount
of
biking
and
I
was
wondering
first
question
is:
is
there
a
rural
component
to
your
plan
and
considerations
and
also
I
think
it
is
also
important
to
consider
that
bikes,
bikers
bicyclists
are
not
always
quiet
for
one
and
they're,
also
not
always
slow,
so
I
wonder
if
you
can
address
that,
because
I
have
two
communities
in
the
rural
area
that
have
experienced
concerns
about
that.
Bikers
are
going
very
fast
in
quiet
areas
and
they're
very
loud,
and
so
they
have
a
lot
of
real
social
thing
going
and
I'm
not
against
that
I.
I
G
G
But
part
of
the
reason
we're
asking
for
this
space
is
to
allow
for
a
little
bit
of
selectivity
on
the
part
of
mobility
devices
and
and
and
people
cycling
and
walking,
so
that
they
can.
They
have
more
room
to
share
the
space
as
far
as
being
loud.
Well,
I
really
can't
control
that
and
I
don't
know
if
I
don't
have
any
magic.
H
G
F
Thank
your
worship,
I
questions
for
mr.
Healey.
One
is
with
regard
to
timing,
so
we
know
that
it's
already
on
mid-june
and
these
fixtures
will
have
to
be
gone
by
November,
and
so
do
we
have
any
ideal
timing
that
like
we
would
want
this
pilot
to
start
up
in
August
or
start
up
by
Labor
Day.
Is
there
any
timing
that
you
have
in
mind.
G
Yeah
well,
we
would
certainly
like
to
get
going
as
soon
as
possible
where
we've
got
things
scheduled
to
go
tomorrow.
If
council
agrees
to
this
motion-
and
we
we
think
we
can
get
moving
with
a
few
very
sort
of
no-brainer
tight
streets
that
are
pretty
much
ready
to
go,
we
could
deal
with
them
very
quickly,
maybe
hopefully
by
first
of
July
we're
not
talking
about
extensive
modifications
into
the
streets.
G
In
fact,
if
you
just
saw
on
the
one
of
the
last
pictures
of
the
slide,
it's
mainly
just
a
barricade
at
the
beginning
of
the
street,
a
barricade
at
the
end
of
the
street
saying
please
slow
down,
and
then
all
the
intersecting
streets
have
a
similar
barricade,
maybe
not
as
big.
So
it's
it's
pretty
simple
in
concept
and
it's
pretty
simple
in
in
in
execution
and
installing
in
and
and
tearing
it
down.
G
At
the
end,
we
will
ask
city
staff
to
review
these
things
and-
and
everything
will
be
according
to
their
their
guidelines,
of
course,
but
the
other
thing
is
there:
the
the
Kingston
transportation
implementation
plan,
the
first
phase
of
the
master
plan
is
already
establishing
very
good
corridors
that
we
would
like
to
sort
of
build
on
and
maybe
do
this
in
advance.
So
so
I
hope
that
answers
your
question
and
your
earlier
question
from
Janette
LaRue
about
how
we
would
go
about
I.
G
Think
I.
Think
I
tried
to
get
it
on
that
one
slide
there
were
we
would.
We
would
first
consult
with
the
neighborhood's,
including
of
course,
the
councillor
and
and
and
ask
for
suggestions,
but
but
it
would
come
forward
from
them
and
and
if
they
don't
want
any
quiet
streets,
that's
fine.
You
know
we
and-
and
the
number
that
we
will
actually
be
prepared
to
do-
will
be
based
on
the
number
of
resources,
the
amount
of
resources
we
have
in
the
number
of
volunteers,
and
so
on
that
we
have.
F
And
then
that
leads
into
my
second
question,
which
was
I'm
in
this
last
slide.
You
showed
you
had
that
one
bullet
about
neighborhood
associations
and
there's
some
districts
like
in
the
West
End
or
even
a
countryside
that
might
not
have
a
neighborhood
association
so
when
it
exclude
an
area
from
participating
just
because
they
do
not
have
the
neighborhood
association.
Is
that
right
or
is
this.
J
G
K
G
Yes,
very
much
so
they're
called
like
boulevards
greenways,
neighborhood
greenways.
That
kind
of
thing
so
there's
a
variety
of
names
and
terms
for
them,
but
that's
that's
essentially
what
a
quiet
street
would
be.
There
would
be
no
changes
in
in
parking
restrictions.
No
changes
at
all
they're,
very
similar
you
would.
G
You
would
be
very
similar
to
what
you've
seen
many
times
is
a
an
area
of
construction
where,
where
an
area
is
defined
as
local
traffic,
only
and
that's
that's,
basically
a
quiet
street
without
the
construction.
So
I
just
wanted
to
just
ask
if,
if
some
of
my
colleagues
here
are
on
the
phone
dr.,
Patricia,
Collins
and
Bruce
Percy,
if
I
have
anything
to
add
to
that.
L
Yeah
it's
Patricia
Collins.
Thank
you
very
much.
Roger
I
think
I.
Just
add
that
I
think
bike
boulevards
are
certainly
very
similar
to
quiet
streets,
but
quite
streets
are
kind
of
a
step
beyond
because
of
the
attempt
to
exclude
non-local
traffic
explicitly,
whereas
bike
boulevards.
Don't
necessarily
do
that.
I.
Think
bike
boulevards
are
really
about
just
alerting
drivers
to
the
fact
that
there
may
be
more
cyclists
on
that
street
than
your
typical
Street,
whereas
the
quiet
street
is
a
very
deliberate
attempt
to
create
space
for
cyclists
and
reduce
the
amount
of
through
traffic
I.
K
E
If
you
worship,
Thank,
You,
Roger
I'm,
a
question
you
or
Holmes
can
answer
this
I
shaped
a
couple
questions
so
there's
the
question.
That's
asked
Jim
Jeanette,
which
was
about
the
winter
situation,
so
many
places
that
have
traffic
restrictions.
For
this
reason,
for
example,
the
annex
in
Toronto,
which
is
had
this
five
streets
type
of
thing
and
the
public
call
it
that,
but
the
local
traffic
only
types
of
restrictions
they're
permanent
and
they
go
through
the
winter.
They
acknowledge
the
fact
that
active
transportation
users
are
year-round.
E
E
G
Yeah
I'll
I'll
take
a
crack
at
that.
I
I'm,
like
you,
I,
think
I
cycle
all
year
round,
I.
There
are
certainly
blizzards
and
things
that
that
get
me
on
a
bus
and
so
on
from
time
to
time,
but
I
think
there's
a
growing
number
of
people
who
are
out
and
and
again
we're
targeting
not
just
cyclists
but
but
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
use
use
these
quiet
streets
or
would
use
them
through
the
winter.
G
I
think
the
the
winter
maintenance
thing
has
to
do
with
removing
bollards
that
are
that
are
screwed
into
the
pavement
and
would
interfere
with
plowing
but
I
again,
I
think
as
part
of
the
the
act
of
transportation
master
plan,
it
was
envisaged
that
that
went
certain
winter
corridors
would
be
established
and
and
there's
a
recognition,
of
course,
of
the
increased
maintenance
to
to
make
sure
there's
snow
cleared
and
so
on.
But
you
may
recall:
well,
every
winter
seems
to
be
slightly
different
now
and
we
had
a
lot
of
snow
in
early
November
and
I.
G
Think
that
you
know
once
that,
hit
everyone
kind
of
shut
down
and
put
their
bicycles.
Okay,
expecting
it
to
be
like
that,
all
winter
and
it
and
it
turned
out
to
be
a
fairly
minor
winter,
first,
no
snowfall,
so
I
was
you
know,
and,
and
so
so
it
can
be,
it
can
be
variable.
I.
Think,
like
I
said,
we
have
to
establish
corridors,
main
corridors
that
connect
neighborhoods.
That
will
be
used
year-round
from
no
doubt,
but
but
for
this
purpose
we
want
to.
E
Yes,
thanks
Roger,
you
know,
that's
that's
way,
satisfied
for
mulch
ain't,
that
a
conundrum-
and
my
second
question
has
more
to
do
with
what
I
was
saying
about
these
long-standing
measures
for
local
traffic
restrictions
in
the
annex
in
Toronto,
which
is
the
first
place,
I
notice
it
because
I
was
a
student
at
University
of
Toronto.
This
was
back
in
the
90s,
so
it's
not
a
new
concept.
How
does
this
putt
quiet
streets
with
temporary
barricades
differ
from
that
more
permanent
model
that
we
see
in
the
annex
in
Toronto
and
I?
E
Don't
think
so
the
wall
since
and
how
is
that
I
have
as
a
completion
moved
away
from
that
type
of
model
of
the
local
traffic
restrictions?
You
know
one-way
streets
that
meet
up
head-on
in
the
middle
of
the
block
and
and
it's
impossible
to
through
traffic.
They
hear
impossible
to
use
as
commuter
route.
That
kind
of
thing
is
this:
is
that
a
completely
different
set
of
restrictions
from
quiet
streets?
And
if
so,
why
is
that
not
part
of
this
wide
streets
behind
okay.
G
I
think
I
know
what
you
mean
where
certain
streets
are
say
interrupted,
so
that
cars
can't
just
physically
can't
get
through
them
and
that
that's
more
I
think
what
Patricia
Collins
was
talking
about.
The
the
the
slight
difference
is
that
bicycle
boulevards
really
try
to
restrict
cars
completely
I
think
the
quiet
streets
are
being
introduced
mainly
because
well
it's
really
to
give
people
a
taste
of
what
it
would
be
like
to
have
more
permanent
Street
barricades.
G
That
kind
of
thing
probably
should
continue,
because
we
don't
want
to
disrupt
residents
that
much,
but
the
the
notion
that
it's
really
just
one
step
further
to
close
off
a
street
and
and
make
it
less
than
less
desirable
or
impossible
for
cars
to
use
and
therefore
more
attractive
for
for
cyclists
and
pedestrians.
And
that
would
allow
individual
neighborhoods
to
identify
those
streets
after
they've
seen
them
with
a
quiet
street
model.
L
Okay
can
I
just
add
to
Rogers
great.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
there's
certainly
no
shortage
of
opportunities
in
Kingston
to
create
those
kinds
of
permanent
installations
that
would
quiet
traffic
on
on
local
residential
streets
and
enable
more
active
transportation,
and
certainly
k-kat
would
be
in
favor
of
any
of
that
kind
of
work.
L
And
so
so
that's
what
this
motion
is
about
and
I
think
what
cake
had
is
mindful
of
is
the
priorities
that
have
already
been
identified
in
the
active
transportation
implementation
plan
and
really
not
wanting
to
detract
from
those
priorities.
And
you
know
the
work
that
that
needs
to
be
done
to
achieve
to
achieve
that
plan.
So
so
I
think
that's
also
sort
of
behind
the
the
rationale
for
the
November
13th
end
date.
L
A
A
Right
next,
we
do
have
a
motion
of
condolence
move
by
Mayor
Patterson
seconded
by
Councillor
bone.
That's
the
sincere
condolences
of
Kingston
city
council,
be
extended
to
the
family
and
friends
of
retired,
volunteer
fire
captain
Dale
Hodgson's,
who
passed
away
on
June,
9th
2020
after
a
courageous
battle
with
amyotrophic
lateral
sclerosis,
also
known
as
Lou
Gehrig's
disease.
They
all
spent
his
career,
helping
people.
In
addition
to
being
a
volunteer
fire
ferret
II.
He
was
a
paramedic
for
more
than
40
years.
Our
thoughts
are
with
Dale's,
family
and
friends
join
difficulty.
A
K
K
A
So
we've
separated
number
one
and
number
four.
So
if
there
are
no
other
separations,
the
first
deal
with
the
clauses
that
have
not
been
separated
so
Clause
2,
+,
3,
+,
Boy,
Scouts,
land,
lease
642
of
MacDonell
street
and
Clause
3
encroachment
agreement,
3,
Drummond
Street,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
and
that's
scary.
M
N
A
M
Joyce,
thank
you
and
through
you
turn
net
provides
information.
They.
Actually
we
get
information
from
M
pack
and
Terra
net
I
can't
speak
to
what
specific
information
is
transferred
between
M
pack
and
Terra
net
other
than
that
there
is
likely
a
fair
amount
of
sharing
of
property
information,
ownership,
information.
M
A
K
P
Here
we
have
been
through
you
just
just
a
quick
question
to
staff.
In
reading
the
report,
it
kind
of
listed
the
expenses
for
services
as
a
whole.
Is
there
a
totalization
of
yearly
services?
The
total
cost
that
it
would
be
yearly,
because
I
know
that
this
contract
runs
greater
than
one
year
if
it
passes,
and
how
does
that?
Compare
to
the
previous
value
that
we've
gotten
on
this
contract.
O
Through
you,
your
worship,
we
didn't
provide
a
total
because
it's
based
on
the
actual
number
of
events.
So
the
way
the
contract
has
been
designed
in
in
previous
years
as
well,
that
the
contractor
only
activates
at
the
call
of
city
management,
and
so
it
depends
on
the
number
of
winter
events.
We
have
the
nature
of
the
winter
events
for
the
duration
of
them,
whether
it's
a
snow
storm
versus
just
de-icing
in
advance
of
ice
storm
forecasts.
So
that
is
why
we
didn't
provide
that
information.
O
P
O
Screw
you
your
work.
Last
year,
staff
presented
an
updated
winter
maintenance
policy
and
that
policy
is
based
on
the
guidelines
that
are
established
through
the
minimum
maintenance
standards.
So
that
is
the
whole
basis
of
the
policy.
It's
not
and
it's
established
is
based
on
classes
of
roads
and,
and
it
is
not
our
intent
to
bring
that
policy
forward
again.
It
was
just
presented
last
fall.
A
She
fell
I,
don't
dispute
that
this
is
an
important
issue,
but
the
key
item-
that's
before
us
is
an
award
of
contract
for
snow
plying
in
the
East
End.
So
I
think
that
what
you're
addressing
is
more
on
the
winter
maintenance
policy,
so
staff
about
4,
but
obviously,
if,
if
you
want
to
bring
a
motion
tree
visit
it-
and
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
separate
from
this
sytem
okay,
if
there
are
no
other
questions
or
comments,
then
I
will
call
the
vote
on
clause
for
all
those
in
favor
opposed
and
that's
carried.
A
Okay,
so
the
first
Clause
approval
of
the
administrative
plan,
City
of
Kingston
heritage
fund,
2022
2021
and
the
appointment
of
councillors
to
participate
in
the
City
of
Kingston
heritage
fund
Gerry
review
process
in
2020,
we'll
see
in
the
recommendation
that
we
are
looking
for
a
councillor
to
serve
for
the
review
committee
for
project
grants
and
then
a
also
a
council
representative
to
participate
in
the
review
committee
for
operating
grants
can
I
have
a
volunteer
or
two
for
both
both
committees.
Councillor
Neill,
thank
you.
A
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much,
okay.
So
with
that
just
noting
a
councillor
Neill
and
Cal,
so
Kylie's
participation
in
those
two
review
committees.
We
will
call
the
vote
all
those
in
favor
opposed
and
that's
character,
plus
two
renewal
of
the
service
level
agreement
between
the
City
of
Kingston,
the
Kingston
Theatre
Alliance,
including
support
for
modified
version
of
the
2020,
kick
and
push
Festival
all
those
in
favor.
Well,
I!
Sorry,
counselor!
Kylie!
Did
you
have
a
question.
C
Q
I
Thank
You
mr.
Maron,
through
you
I,
did
have
director
Wigington
on
here,
but
I.
Don't
quite
see
him
right
now,
but
that's
okay!
Thank
you
for
the
question.
Counselor
Kiley,
don't
anticipate,
maybe
the
entire
same
amount
of
employment
opportunities
with
this
year
with
pandemic,
but
the
Kingston
Theatre
lines
has
expressed.
There
will
be
higher
ranks
for
summer
students
and
indefinitely
their
staff
and
other
opportunities.
So
it
might
not
make
the
same
amount
of
previous
years,
but
definitely
a
lot
of
hours
and
opportunities
for
people
to
be
employed
on
the
through
this
work.
A.
N
Yes,
you,
your
chair,
the
funding
that
was
approved
in
the
2020
operating
budget
was
$50,000.
I
given
the
modifications
based
on
the
fact
that
there's
thought
as
many
and
will
not
be
an
in
person
version
of
this.
Why
are
we
retaining
the
same
costing
and
is
there
not
an
opportunity
to
reduce
the
the
funded.
A
H
Now
your
worship
I
am
here
at
cone
Bloomington.
So
through
you
I'm
happy
to
answer
that
question.
In
reality,
last
year
in
2019
we
had
in
our
cultural
services
budget
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
to
support
the
Kingston
Theatre
Alliance
and
the
kick
and
push
festival.
This
year
we
actually
budgeted
sixty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
chose
to
reduce
the
funding
that
we
are
proposing
to
contribute
to
fifty
thousand
dollars.
H
The
call
for
proposals
for
this
year's
festival
just
closed
yesterday.
There
was
81
submission,
so
a
strong
interest
from
across
the
country
from
artists
to
participate
in
this
year's
festival,
and
the
challenge
to
them
is
to
provide
a
robust
program
that
combines
in-person
with
online
and
other
alternative
opportunities.
So
we
do
have
a
chance
this
year
to
attract
both
local,
regional
and
national
intentions.
This
festival
is
one
of
the
few
offerings
that
may
be
available
to
audiences
this
summer.
A
B
A
A
Okay.
We
have
nothing
from
committee
of
the
whole
information
reports.
If
you
have
any
questions,
just
raise
your
hand
as
I
read
through
them
number
one
tendering
contractor
words
subject
to
the
establish
criteria
for
delegation
of
authority
for
the
month
of
April
2020
through
crossing
quarterly
update,
q2
2020,
that's
for
Sanok.
F
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
I
threw
you
just
one
question
staff
great
to
see
that
we're
still
right
on
budget
on
when,
if
someone
was
to
ask
us
today,
when
is
the
expected
completion
of
that
their
crossing?
Is
it
the
summer
of
2022?
Is
that
still
what
we're
looking
at
or
is
it
a
bit
delayed
now
because
it
closed
in.
Q
F
R
Okay,
so
yeah
on
page
2
of
9
of
the
report.
It
indicates
that
the
city
was
given
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
enforcing
visit,
building
regulations
which
are
absent
from
the
legislation
and
that
they
concern
high
risk
for
public
education
on
good
construction
practices
and
public
safety
during
construction.
But
it
indicates
that
it's
only
a
guideline
and
rather
than
a
regulation,
is
not
enforceable
under
law.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
this
mean
does
this
mean
that
construction
safety
features
identified
in
coroner's
reports
are
still
not
covered
by
enforceable
law.
J
R
You're
gonna
be
good
I'm,
just
interested
in
how
this
fails
to
where
does
a
sector,
public
safety
and
the
safety
of
workers
on
the
job.
I
have
a
second
question
and
that
is
to
staff.
Will
council,
we
know
the
Doeg
24
covers
a
lot
of
ground,
not
just
the
building
code.
So
what
counsel
receive
a
report
on
the
social
housing
provisions
and
implications
of
bill
184.
T
T
R
This
is
only
my.
This
is
my
last
question.
The
one
I
just
asked
so
I'll
just
indicate
that
it's
it's
important,
as
indicated
by
our
MPP
and
Arthur,
and
the
paper
today
that
the
bill
actually
accelerates
addictions
and
weakens
protections
for
tenants
and
also
indicates
that
municipalities
will
no
longer
required
to
provide
a
set
number
of
social
housing
units.
So
I
just
think
it's
important.
So
if
you
could
get
back
to
me
about
that,
I'd
appreciate
it.
If
news
captain
our
hunt
can
answer
the
first
question.
That
would
be
useful.
S
S
Sorry
about
that,
so
the
first
question:
counselor
Hutchinson,
the
public
education
and
good
construction
practices
that
we're
speaking
to
in
the
first
page
of
the
report
was
with
regards
to
safety
during
construction.
There's
nothing
currently
in
the
building
code
act
that
requires
a
site
to
be
safe
during
construction
and
at
the
time
when
that
guideline
come
out
is
when
we
had
the
large
fire
downtown
Kingston.
R
R
A
Hey,
thank
you
so
seeing
no
other
questions
at
this
point
we'll
continue
on.
We
have
no
information
reports,
members
of
council.
We
have
no
miscellaneous
business,
so
we
will
move
on
to
new
motions.
We
have
foreign
emotions
on
deck
for
the
first
new
motion,
I'm
going
to
hand
the
chair
over
to
deputy
mayor
Hill
and
Deborah
Mary
Hill
aye.
A
U
I
will
certainly
take
your
advice,
your
worship
on
that,
so,
whereas
it
has
been
determined
that
this
additional
delegation
of
authority
to
the
chief
administrative
officer
thought,
oh,
yes,
is
no
longer
required
as
the
city
of
cases.
If
any
stage,
two
of
the
provisional
reopening
plan,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
a
bylaw
be
presented
to
Council
and
given
three
readings
at
the
same
meeting
in
order
to
amend
by
lot
number
2016
189,
as
amended
being
a
bylaw
to
consolidate
the
delegation
of
power
and
duty
by
deleting
Schedule
B
in
its
entirety.
U
A
Thank
you
very
much
deputy
mayor,
oh
just
to
be
clear.
The
the
purpose
of
this
motion
is
to
rescind
the
delegated
authority
to
see
a
little
and
to
staff
to
Council
extended
back
on
March
the
24th
now
just
just
to
make
sure
that
there
isn't
any
confusion
around
the
council
table
on
this
there
were.
There
are
actually
two
things
that
happened
back
at
that
third
third
week
of
March.
So
on
March,
the
24th
Council
passed
a
motion
to
extend
this
delegated
authority,
giving
additional
powers
to
staff
to
respond
to
kovat
and
then
on
March.
A
The
26th.
Two
days
later,
I
declared
a
state
of
emergency
I'm
universally
here
in
in
the
city
of
Houston.
So
just
to
be
clear,
these
two
things
are
are
different,
so
the
state
of
emergency
gives
powers
to
to
stuff
and
some
to
myself
to
be
able
to
respond
quickly
as
needed
to
guard
the
the
health
and
safety
of
community
members.
So
there
are
our
pieces
under
that,
for
example,
changes
to
operations
of
transit
or
changes
to
operations
of
shelters
all
to
do
with,
for
example,
preserving
physical
and
social
distancing.
A
All
of
that
is
directly
related
to
guarding
the
health
and
safety
of
of
the
public.
That's
under
the
state
of
emergency
provisions
and
to
be
clear.
Those
remain
in
place.
I've
had
some
discussions
with
other
heads
of
Council
in
the
region,
and
we
are
all
of
the
mind
that
that
state
of
emergency
provisions
should
remain
in
place,
certainly
as
long
as
the
provincial
state
of
emergency
is
in
place
as
well.
A
So,
for
example,
waiving
fees
for
patio
licenses
or
being
able
to
change
feets
for
for
parking
or
some
of
those
pieces
that
are
not
directly
rated
to
the
public
and
say
Public,
Health
and
Safety,
but
are
certainly
connected
to
some
of
what
our
community
is
going
through.
So
I
just
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
and
acknowledge
city
staff
for
their
work
office
over
the
last
three
months.
A
I
think
CEO
hurdle
and
the
entire
corporate
management
team
have,
and
our
city
staff
as
a
whole
have
done
a
fantastic
job,
responding
remarkably
quickly
on
a
whole
range
of
fronts,
particularly
in
the
crisis
phase
that
I
think
we
all
saw
unfold,
certainly
in
the
months
of
March
and
April.
So
I
want
to
recognize
that
this
motion,
that
is
in
front
of
us,
it's
not
a
reflection
that
somehow
that
that
work
hasn't
hasn't
been
done
at
an
exceptionally
high
level.
A
A
U
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
like
the
rest
of
Council.
When
the
delegated
authority
motion
first
came
forward,
I
said
at
the
very
beginning
of
these
trying
times.
I
like
everybody
else,
supported
it
and
I,
don't
regret
that
support.
They
do
appreciate
the
motion
tonight,
though,
because
we,
as
a
body,
are
the
elected
officials
to
represent
constituents,
and
there
wasn't
and
I
appreciate
that
there
had
to
be
decisions
made
in
a
kind
of
nimble,
quick
way
during
the
crisis,
but
sometimes
the
community
didn't
hear
about
it
before
it
happened.
K
Having
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
and
discuss
issues
around
bylaws
and
and
that
and
it'll
be
nice
to
get
back
to
being
able
to
find
a
focus
on
our
council
priorities
as
well
and
I
know
that
that
that
will
be
tempered
by
the
fact
that
we're
living
through
a
crisis.
But
it
would
be
nice
to
be
able
to
return
to
some
of
those
objectives
that
we've
set
for
ourselves
so
but
I
totally
support
motion
before
us.
Thank
you.
U
E
E
The
in
my
mind
the
the
the
instance
of
a
major
decision
that
was
made.
That
has
a
great
impact
to
my
residents,
and
that
was
done
with
no
consultation
with
residents
and
still
has
has
yet
to
occur
every
case
it
isn't
set
to
take
place
until
next
week,
but
that
decision
will
get
as
far
as
I
understand
it.
If
it's
in
category
of
the
delegated
authority,
which
I
think
it
is
my
question
that
is
basically
set
in
stone
by
the
second
clause,
which
says
all
the
decisions
that
were
made
by
this.
E
You
know
second
cause
they're
between
24th
of
June
16th,
so
the
one
I'm
talking
about
is
T.
It's
the
partial
closure
of
some
down
town
right-of-ways
in
consultation,
so
that
decision,
while
it
may
be
even
thing,
was
not
done
with
any
public
consultation,
and
that
is
undemocratic,
and
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
really
have
a
moral
obligation
to
consult
more
widely
with
assistance.
Before
we
do
that,
because
it's
not
just
my
residents,
everybody
think
Acheson
is
affected
by
what
we
do
to
the
downtown.
So
I
was
just
gonna
confirm.
E
A
V
E
H
E
Work
of
delegated
sorted
by
the
CEO
in
consultation
with
the
DIA,
but
nobody
else
is
problematic
and
remains
so
to
this
day
and
say:
yes,
it
is
not
yet
been
implemented.
Perhaps
we
can
amend
the
second
clause
to
exclude
that
particular
decision
so
that
we
can
open
it
for
debate
and
public
consultation,
and
that
would
be
my
that
we
would
do
that
if
we
don't
do
that,
we
will
be
when
we
vote
on
this.
E
E
O
K
Thank
you.
My
point
of
order
regards
the
powers
that
the
province
gave
to
mayors
under
the
emergency
act,
the
emergency
declaration.
So
is
it
within
our
power
to
take
away
that
so
I
know
I'm
a
procedural
wonk
and
I'm
asking
a
procedurally
wonky
question,
but
is
it
indeed
within
our
powers
to
declare
the
mayor
no
longer
has
emergency
powers
under
the
provincial
legislation
so.
A
Thank
you,
Thank
You,
deputy
mayor,
so
jack
on,
just
as
a
point
of
order,
so
without
necessarily
addressing
the
the
previous
questions
before
I
leave
just
hearing
from
the
clerk
that
it's
not
necessary
to
amend
this
motion.
If
counsel
wishes
to
revisit
a
decision
that
has
already
been
taken,
it
would
be
in
order
I
believe
for
council
motion
to
come
forward
along
the
lines
of
what
CA
or
Hurdle
has
said.
If
council
wanted
to
provide
a
different
direction,
so
I
that's
my
understanding,
but
perhaps
deputy
mayor.
W
Sure,
deputy
mayor
you're
correct
the
motion
as
it
stands
can
be
passed,
and
what
did
you
put
this
last
Clause
counselor
can
bring
a
motion
for
death
next
meeting
and
that
will
basically
be
paired
to
undo
the
decision
that
was
previously
made
by
the
CEO
so
past.
The
recommendation
tonight
come
back
with
motion
and
that.
E
E
Until
such
time
is
waived,
reduced
deferred,
as
amended
or
resolution
of
council,
so
I
take
it
that
the
clerk
was
referring
to
that
line
and
that's
why
the
reconsideration
is
not
needed,
because
the
council
motion
is
this
one
and
it
includes
wording
about
revoking
any
part
of
the
of
the
of
the
decisions
that
were
made,
what
if
council
gets
to
it.
So
so
that's
is
that
right.
Mr.
Kirk,
the
the
last
part
of
Clause
2,
leaves
the
door
open
for
essentially
revisiting
any
part
of
the
30
decisions.
Even
if
we
pass
this
clause,
you.
E
And
submit
a
motion
for
our
next
meeting,
Weber
yeah
I
believe
the
go-live
date
of
those
closures
is
June,
22nd,
I.
Suppose
that
doesn't
really
mean
that
we
can't
be
visit
the
decision.
Maybe
then
we'll
have
a
little
bit
more
live
field
testing
info
by
then.
So
it's
it.
So
it's
six
of
one
half
dozen,
but
the
timing
is
noteworthy
that
today's
two
sixteenth
and
our
next
meeting
seven.
A
V
Thank
you,
and
through
your
deputy
mayor,
I
I
would
suggest
if,
if
council
wishes
to
not
proceed
with
this
particular
initiative,
I
would
suggest
that
the
direction
be
given
as
soon
as
possible,
because
the
timing
is
to
be
installing
these
the
jersey
barriers
etc
in
late
June.
So
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
next
council
meeting,
those
will
already
be
in
place.
So
the
desire
is
not
to
proceed
and
essentially
leave
things
as
they
are.
Then
I
would
suggest
that
probably
the
best
thing
to
do
would
be
to
provide
direction
as
soon
as
possible.
V
W
E
So,
given
what
the
total
spending
working,
what
the
CEO
has
just
said
about
the
practical
implications
of
the
decision,
the
talk
is
are
essentially
already
ticking,
that
the
changes
are
going
into
place
in
a
week
and
a
public
consultation
that
did
not
occur.
It's
going
to
take
longer
than
that.
So,
on
the
one
hand,
that
explains
why
the
decision
was
made
with
consultation
of
only
one
body,
because
there's
expedient
on.
Q
E
U
A
Thank
you,
deputy
mayor
and
perhaps
to
jump
in
on
this
point.
I
think
what
we're
hearing
from
staff
is
that,
if
there's
a
change
of
direction,
it
needs
to
happen
right
away.
It's
council
strep
is
preferred,
but
not
necessarily
with
this
motion
so
hold
on
spine
I'm,
just
I'm
just
offering
a
suggestion,
which
is
that
we
could
pass
this
motion
and
then
we
could
take
a
five-minute
recess.
If
Drabek
wishes
to
put
forward
a
motion,
then
we
could
deal
with
it
with
it
tonight.
I
offer
that,
just
simply
as
a
suggestion.
E
Yeah
I
was
just
I,
was
gonna,
make
a
point
of
order
to
appoint
board
I,
don't
believe
that
was
a
point
of
order.
Mr.
vice
chair,
that
was
simply
another
perspective
on
the
issue
that
I
brought
up
and
if
I
did
make
an
amendment,
we
don't
want
the
chance
to
speak
to
it.
The
question
is
whether
it
makes
sense
to
even
do
that
at
this
late
hour
with
the
go-live
date
and
a
week
away,
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
I'd
like
things
to
be
different.
E
That
was
a
personal
decision.
I
know
it's
involved
in
the
decision
to
exclude
all
of
Council
and
exclude
all
the
other
than
the
DIA,
and
that
is
not
public
consultation.
It's
inconsistent
with
open
government.
It's
inconsistent
with
everything
we
talked
about
in
the
last
five
years,
and
it's
amendable.
That
being
said,
the
clock
is
ticking
rather
than
throw
the
baby
out
with
the
bathwater
and
start
from
scratch,
with
the
five-minute
recess.
E
I
think
I'm
going
to
just
leave
it
at
that
I've
made
my
point:
I
appreciate
what
happened,
nor
does
any
Democratic
citizen
of
the
city,
and
maybe
we
can
learn
from
this
and
the
next
time.
Something
of
this
nature,
a
comes
along.
More
effort
can
be
made
to
try
to
get
some.
You
know
take
a
couple
of
weeks
to
gather
input
the
way
that
we
do
on
every
other
file
and
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
I
won't
take
any
action
tonight.
Thank
You.
R
Correct
so
just
to
be
clear
under
this
motion,
the
mayor
retains
its
power.
It
does
the
mayor
regain
his
powers
under
the
declaration,
the
local
direction
of
emergency
they're,
not
quite
sure
what
is
the
FOC
of
that?
Why
would
be
canceling
the
delegated
authority
to
scale?
Why
would
we
not
cancel
both
powers
sitting
there
with.
A
Thank
you,
a
deputy
mayor,
I
can
respond,
and
then
I
would
certainly
be
if,
if
mr.
McLeod
wanted
to,
or
someone
from
staff
wanted
to
jump
in
as
well
so
to
be
clear,
I
think
that
the
reason
why
we
would
keep
the
state
of
emergency
in
place
is
because
it
still
allows
for
decisions
to
be
made
that
to
the
public
health
safety
in
our
community
and
I.
Think
that
we
can
all
agree
that
the
pandemic
is
not
over.
We
are
simply
having
to
adapt
to
it.
A
C
A
That
we
could
have
if,
as
we
reopen,
that,
that
becomes
an
issue
that
we
could
respond
and
there's
many
other
operational
issues
again
related
to
kovat,
where
I
think
that,
having
that
ability
to
be
able
to
respond
quickly
again,
because
trans
and
rates
can
can
spike
early
and
quickly
being
able
to
respond
quickly.
If,
for
example,
we
got
direction
from
capital
and
a
public-health
that
we
had
to
move
to
to
address
a
risk
in
our
community
so
that
that's
what
I
would
say
would
be
the
rationale
for
keeping
the
state
emergency
place,
but
I'm
happy.
M
Thank
you
and
three
deputy
mayor
so
just
to
be
clear.
Under
the
emergency
management
and
civil
protection
act
once
we
declare
a
state
of
emergency,
then
the
there
is
an
implicit,
implicit
legal
obligation
and
associated
with
that,
and
that
is
for
the
head
of
Council
or
their
delegate
to
protect
property
and
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
inhabitants
of
the
emergency
area.
R
I
just
have
one
clarification:
it
has
to
do
with
democratic
governance
and
we
shouldn't
shouldn't.
Do
ourselves
yeah
the
issue
of
I'm,
not
sure
of
the
argument,
but
the
choice
game
was
good
and
part
of
what
the
merit
said
is
good,
but
the
argument
about
the
finds
seems
to
me
that
Council
passed
that
motion
and
that's
what
allows
us
to
loving
the
fines,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
a
mirror
for
that.
We
need
a
mirror
for
lots
of
things.
Don't
get
me
wrong,
but
I
think
we
just
keep
these
things
in
mind.
R
A
So
I
think
that
that's
probably
a
question
best
addressed
to
me
so
so
counsel,
Hutchison
I
I
mean
it
would
be
a
motion
that
has
to
be
passed
by
council.
But
yes,
I
could
see
a
circumstance
where
if
there
was
a
strong
second
wave
and
we
had
to
to
respond
intially
act
circumstances
similar
to
what
we
saw
back
in
March,
then
you
I
could
see
that
there
could
be
a
a
rash
on
a
reason
why
we
want
to
to
once
again
bring
forward
a
motion
that
would
be
up
for
council
discussion.
A
M
M
R
Just
on
the
point
that
comes
later,
Stroud
brought
up
the
I
just
want
to
I.
Think
people
are
assuming
that
this.
You
know
the
closure
of
the
walls
routes
downtown
is
taking
place.
You
might
get
the
impression
without
controversy,
but
that
is
heap
when
it
is
not
true
and
I've
heard
different
onions
as
well.
R
You
know
first
blush:
should
you
think?
Okay?
This
is
probably
good,
but
there
are
actually
public
health
issues
there
and
I
not
sure.
If,
again,
you
can
be
pulled
off
and
that
is
being
expressed
to
me
by
a
number
of
residents
I'm
starting
to
get
the
pushback
from
businesses
so
because
everybody
doesn't
benefit
to
this
in
the
same
way
to
the
same
conditions.
This
is
I
think
this
is
just
factual.
Okay
relates
to
any
kind
of
big
festival.
Downtown
certain
businesses
see
a
drop-off
in
business.
I.
R
Think
they're
concerned
about
this
happening
in
this
case
too.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
this
is
something
we
should.
You
know
seriously
consider
when
what
is
happening
has
come.
Some
Strout
pointed
out
without
public
consultation
debate.
We
were,
they
don't
know,
I,
don't
know,
okay,
because
I
can't
it's
hard
to
judge.
I
know
there
are
ad
BIA,
and
certainly
some
of
their
members
are
strongly
in
favor.
R
I
know
for
a
fact,
not
all
okay,
so
it
was
the
councilors
dads
directly
downtown
a
bit.
So
it
raises
the
question:
was
the
decision
to
do
this,
a
business
decision
or
a
public
health
decision?
I,
don't
see
the
public
health
argument
and
that's
what
the
delegation
of
authority
was
about.
I,
don't
want
to
I'm
not
being
negative
about
staff.
They
did
far
as
I'm
concerned
a
really
good
job,
but
now
we're
talking
about
the
issues
that
come
up
when
decisions
are
made
in
a
certain
way,
then
I
feel
it's.
R
R
V
Thank
you
and
through
you
deputy
mayor,
so
there
were
questions
from
Council
Rogerson
in
terms
of
what
was
considered
in
the
decision
and
for
a
number
of
you.
You
might
recall
that
this
actually
started
quite
some
time
ago
through
emails
that
we
received
from
constituents
asking
if
there
was
any
way
that
the
city
could
provide
more
space
for
pedestrians
downtown
as
they
were,
walking
on
Princess
Street
and
concern
about
the
space
or
the
lack
of
space
and
some
of
the
streets
downtown.
V
So
we
we
did
get
a
number
of
emails
with
with
those
requests
and
questions.
That's
when
we
actually
started
to
look
at
this
concept
of
either
closing
or
reducing
lanes
within
the
downtown,
as
we
actually
started
to
look
into
that,
because
we
had
been
receiving
these
emails
and
some
of
them
from
members
of
council
through
members
of
council
from
constituents.
V
We
also
started
to
have
conversations
with
businesses
that
were
located,
obviously
on
those
streets
and
look
at
how
can?
How
could
we
do
something
that
could
maybe
benefit
both
one?
The
pedestrians
having
more
space
cyclists
having
more
space
as
well
as
some
businesses
being
able
to
have
more
outdoor
space,
knowing
that
with
Cove
in
nineteen,
there
are
more
space
restrictions,
obviously
with
social
distancing.
So
I
do
want
to
indicate
that
the
only
Street
that
will
be
closed
is
Market.
V
Street
princess
Street
will
be
reduced
to
one
lane,
and
Braque
Street
will
be
reduced
to
one
lane,
so
traffic
is
still
going
through.
The
liveries
are
still
going
to
happen.
All
of
those
things
are
still
going
to
take
place,
but
with
the
reduced
space,
meaning
the
parking
lay
by
taking
out
obviously
creating
more
space
for
people
and
businesses
with
the
reduction
to
one
lane,
so
that
that's
where
this
actually
all
started.
It
started
with
the
public
asking
for
ways
to
create
more
space
on
some
of
the
downtown
streets.
N
Yes,
three,
your
chair,
I'm,
just
tweaked
by
some
of
the
comments
with
regards
to
the
emergency
declaration,
and
this
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
had
raised
the
concerns
early
on
about
having
a
timeline
or
a
window
similar
to
the
province
does
every
21
days.
But
we
don't
have
that
restriction
on
an
emergency.
N
That
council
would
have
to
come
and
vote
on
whether
to
extend
the
emergency
or
not,
and
we've
been
really
fortunate
in
Kingston,
through
the
diligence
of
our
residents
and
our
health
staff
and
team
to
really
work
hard
to
keep
our
incidence
of
the
Wu
hen
virus
down
and
and
because
of
that,
and
because
Kingston
has
already
you
know,
logged
the
ideas
of
you
know.
You
know:
separation
from
the
province
to
manage
our
own
affairs
I
think
we
should
continue
to
be
the
leader
and
not
wait
for
the
province
and
remove
our
emergency
declaration.
N
A
Thank
You
deputy
mayor
I
appreciate
the
the
debate
and
the
discussion
the
input
around
the
table.
There
is
no
question
that
there
is
a
trade-off
when
we
extended
delegated
authority
to
staff.
It
was
for
a
reason.
It
was
because
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
take
quick
action
to
be
able
to
respond
to
needs
and
the
concerns
that
we
were
hearing
and
I
know
that
everyone
around
this
table
was
getting
emails
from
residents
and
from
business
owners
on
a
whole
range
of
different
consents.
So
we
could
have.
We
could
have
gone
with
a
usual
timeline.
A
We
could
have
consulted
on
a
whole
number
of
different
decisions,
all
many
decisions
that
were
very,
very
important.
That
impacted
many
many
people,
whether
it
was
the
changes
to
Kingston
transit,
whether
it
was
the
changes
to
parking
or
garbage
collection,
I.
Just
think
of
a
number
of
things
that
that
had
to
be
to
be
addressed
in
the
last
three
months
and
it's
true,
we
did
have
to
put
consultation
aside.
There
is
absolutely
that
trade-off.
A
My
take
is
that
in
the
crisis
phase
that
that
is
the
time
where
you
do
that,
because
the
quick
action,
the
quick
response
is
more
important.
That's
why
I
bring
for
this
motion
now,
because
I
believe
that
now
we
do
need
to
shift
back
appreciate
the
concerns,
certainly
on
the
downtown
street
closures.
A
There's
no
doubt
that
there's
been
lots
of
details,
it's
very
difficult
to
get
700
businesses
all
to
agree,
but
where
I
will
say
this,
there
has
been
a
staff
in
the
background
that
had
been
doing
an
enormous
amount
of
work,
individual
consultations
with
businesses
trying
to
get
those
details
right
and
again.
Certainly
this
was
a
response,
as
CEO
hurdle
said
many
people
that
came
to
my
office
wanting
this
additional
Street
closure
space
for
for
more
space
for
pedestrians
to
feel
comfortable,
being
able
to
walk,
downtown
and
still
be
able
to
physical
distance.
A
So
it's
one
of
those
things
where
you
know
you
do
your
best
in
that
moment,
but
I
think
going
forward.
I'm,
certainly
fine
to
have
some
shift
back
and
have
a
council
deal
with
some
of
the
many
difficult
decisions
yet
to
come
this
year
and
into
next
year,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
the
feedback
from
council
enough.
U
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much
deputy
mayor,
so
we
will
now
move
to
new
motion.
Number
two
moved
by
Councillor
Doherty
second
by
councillor
Kiley,
whereas
daily
physical
activity
and
time
spent
outdoors
are
tremendously
important
for
people's
mental
and
physical
well-being,
particularly
during
the
Cova
19
pandemic.
A
Whereas
the
city
is
committed
to
the
engagement
of
residents
on
matters
that
affect
their
quality
of
life
and
their
city
facilitate
more
informed
and
inclusive
municipal
decision-making,
as
per
the
municipal,
as
per
the
Public
Engagement
framework
approved
by
City
Council
in
October.
2017,
therefore
be
it
resolved
at
the
city
modified.
The
existing
road
closure
process,
where
possible,
to
pilot
a
quiet
street
implementation
through
the
installation
of
signage
temporary
fixtures
and
by
limiting
vehicles
to
local
traffic.
X
Thank
You
mr.
Aaron
I'm
really
happy
to
speak
on
this
motion
about
ten
minutes
ago.
My
computer
crashed
my
internet,
crashed
and
I
thought.
I
missed
the
whole
thing
altogether,
so
I'm
very
happy
to
to
be
able
to
speak
to
the
motion
that
is
in
front
of
us
that
moment
the
quite
Street
motion,
so
the
delegation
we
heard
earlier
this
evening
spoke
really
well
to
what
the
quiet
Street
project
is
actually
all
about.
This
would
be
a
pilot
project,
a
collaborative
community-based
project
between
the
Kingston
coalition
of
active
transportation
and
our
city.
X
It
is
a
creative
project
that
has
the
potential
of
increasing
safe
walking
paths
for
residents.
The
fact
is
that
many
of
our
sites
works
just
are
not
wide
enough
for
social
distancing
and
people's
paths
cross.
Somebody
is
often
forced
onto
the
road.
So,
during
this
pilot,
cake
hat
will
be
working
with
residents
and
they
will
submit
some
streets
for
partial
closures
to
create
quiet
streets.
We've
never
done
anything
like
this
before,
and
it
is
a
wonderful
that
we
have
in
our
community
a
group
that's
so
dedicated
and
knowledgeable
when
it
comes
to
active
transportation.
X
A
K
Thank
you
very
much.
I
really
appreciate
the
intent
of
this
and
I
was
somewhat
reassured
when
the
delegation
who
clearly
are
going
to
be
engaged
in
this
spoke
about
maintaining
and
making
sure
that
there
was
community
engagement
in
the
decisions.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
I
know.
First
of
all,
the
idea
that,
like
boulevards
limit
traffic,
isn't
actually
accurate
bike
boulevards,
for
instance,
reduce
speeds
on
a
bike
Boulevard.
K
Is
it
our
intent
and
I'll
ask
staff
this
question:
do
you
foresee
us
lowering
the
truck
speed
limit,
because
without
signage
50
kilometres
an
hour
is
the
allowable
speed?
What
bike
boulevards
do?
Is
they
put
up
signage?
That
says,
please
yield
to
bikes
and
they
reduce
the
traffic?
Are
we
considering
those
steps
for
the
quiet
streets.
Y
I
guess
through
you,
your
worship,
so
with
respect
to
the
speed
limit
on
the
segments
or
for
streets
that
KCAP
proposed
be
the
speed
limit.
That's
that's
in
effect,
or
that's.
That's
in
fact,
under
the
bylaw
would
remain.
However,
in
these
types
of
implementations,
there
is
often
signage
or
advisory
signage
added,
similar
to
what
you're
speaking
to
counsel
Amir
Neil.
Y
That
asks
for
us
vehicles
and
at
one
ask
vehicles
to
respect
local
traffic
only
and
indicates
that
it's
a
quiet
street
that
it's
intended
for
all
users
and
should
be
mindful
of
those
users
they
may
see
and
and
can
advise
a
speed
reduction,
be
a
the
official
speed
limit,
though,
would
sort
of
remain
with
what
is
installed
on
that
street.
Hey.
K
I
guess
I
find
that
a
little
bit
frustrating
because
cab,
drivers,
pizza
delivery,
drivers
all
have
shortened
routes
and,
if
they're
still
allowed
to
drive
at
the
regular
speed.
They'll
do
so,
and
so
that's
that's
a
safety
concern
that
I
I
would
have
the
so
so
if
we
can
at
least
have
a
consideration
for
lower
speeds
on
those
stretches
of
quiet
streets,
because
otherwise
I
think
we
may
unintentionally
be
endangering
some
people
who
feel
that
they
have
been
told
that
they
have
it's
a
safer
Street.
K
But
we'll
still
have
some
cowboy
drivers,
some
taxi
drivers,
some
pizza
delivery
people
who
will
be
trying
to
get
to
their
destination
fairly
quickly.
The
other
thing
I
just
want
to
enter
and
I
shared
councillors.
Droughts
kind
of
concern
about
about
the
idea
of
delegated
authority
and
I
did
share
with
the
mover
and
the
seconder
and
the
mayor
earlier
in
the
week.
A
concern
about
about
this
delegated
authority,
possibly
leaving
the
community
or
leaving
council
somewhat
out
of
the
loop,
which
has
happened
with
delegated
authority
in
the
past.
K
Y
As
through
you
to
your
question,
councillor
Neill
as
it
relates
to
being
informed
about
the
implementation
of
of
a
quiet
street.
This
would
be
part
of
our
existing
road
closure
and
lane
closure
process,
which
includes
sort
of
communicating
out
that
application
to
variety
of
stakeholders,
including
stakeholders
that
have
asked
to
be
sort
of
included
on
any
of
those
circulations.
So
I
think
as
part
of
this
process.
As
part
of
the
existing
main
closure
road
closure
process.
K
Y
And
through
you,
mr.
mayor
I,
I
think
the
as
the
road
closure
and
lane
closure
process
exists
right
now
it
is.
It
is
typically
sort
of
at
the
information
stage
when
the
when
the
implementation
is
not
I,
think
the
the
organization
that
that
would
be
bringing
the
application
forward.
So
in
this
case
Kate
cat
they
they
have
committed
to
consulting
with
the
residences,
the
residents,
the
neighborhoods
neighborhood
associations
and
I
presume
they
that
they
would
also
be
consulting
with
with
the
local
councillors.
Z
Thank
your
worship,
I
support
the
motion,
I
think
the
any
sort
of
concerns
about
implementation,
etc.
Given
that
it's
a
pilot
which
I
suit
I,
don't
only
support
pilot
the
intima
in
theory,
the
concept
of
a
pilot
is
just
always
a
bit
of
a
seams,
not
always
a
fulsome
enough
step
forward,
but
in
this
case
there
are
so
many
uncertainties
with
the
future
of
Transportation
and
and
the
situation
that
we're
in
that
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
It's
very
practical,
but
also
really
important.
Z
To
you
know,
I
mean
I,
think
they'll
all
learn
as
we
see
this
project
roll
out
and
and
hopefully
we'll
continue
to
share
our
views
and
the
feedback
that
we
receive
with
k-kat
and
with
our
city
staff,
so
that
we
can
work
towards
those
improvements,
but
rather
than
overcomplicated
it
over.
A
couple
heated
at
the
own
set
I
would
just
like
I
would
like
to.
Z
You
know
give
thanks
to
the
organization
that
is
taking
this
online
quite
a
lot
of
the
work
involved
and
are
prepared
to
do
so
to
address
what
is
really
a
very
timely
concern
for
a
lot
of
residents
in
the
city,
which
is
that
you
know
trying
to
balance
their
desire,
their
desire
for
more
outdoor
activity
and
active
transportation,
with
maybe
some
reluctance
to
to
go
out
and
try
cycling
with
a
family,
their
family
members
on
a
on
the
street.
That
is
not
one
that
they're
familiar
traveling
on.
F
Thank
you,
your
worship,
I
suppose
and
I
actually
had
residents
approached
me
last
week
on
one
street
that
when
they
heard
at
this
program,
they
want
to
be
considered
for
it.
So
there's
great
enthusiasm
from
one
street
and
whites
a
strict
to
be
part
of
this
pilot
project
of
a
question
to
mr.
simple
it's.
So
the
motion
reads
that
the
road
closure
fee
would
be
on
way
for
2020.
F
Y
Those
the
base
donor
on
sort
of
staff,
understanding
of
the
program
that's
been
proposed
by
k-kat.
We
expect
that
that
time
should
be
minimal.
The
implementation
that
they're
proposing
examples
that
they
have
provided
it
I
would
expect
that
the
the
impact
on
on
staff
time
and
those
associated
fees
would
be
quite
minimal.
Moving
forward,
I
think
that
that
sort
of
a
review
of
how
those
fees
could
be
covered
in
the
future
can
be
part
of
the
report.
This
brought
next
year
about
how
this
about
this
arrangement
and
implementation
functioned.
Y
F
E
It's
very
well
moments
moments
in
in
it
that
I
wanted
to
clarify
before
we
vote
and
just
rely
for
you
with
my
colleagues
that
have
spoken
so
far
in
favor.
So
there's
a
couple
and
I
moved
into
one
at
the
beginning.
So
when
I
was
asking
at
the
delegates,
so
the
thing
about
the
winter
control
so,
first
of
all,
is
it
my
understanding
from
listening
to
everything?
E
Y
E
There
are
year-round
users
of
active
transportation,
as
we
all
know,
and
how
and
those
people
are
perhaps
I
did
it
wondering
why
that
causes
there?
If,
if
it's
also
the
end
of
the
pilot
and
and
it
makes
sense
to
go
inside
the
end
of
the
planet
with
the
beginning
of
the
winter
season,
I
can
see.
Actually
the
rationale
for
it
now
so
so
I
won't
be
asked
to
separate
that
clouds
to
vote
against
it.
E
I
was
going
to
until
the
the
other
question
I
had
well
actually
before
we
leave
that
I
do
have
another
question
that
about
that
winter.
So
we
have
those
bollards
on
Rock
and
Johnson.
For
example,
we've
already
heard
tonight
how
they
those
get
removed
in
November
December
for
the
winter
control,
so
I
also
know
that
other
cities
don't
do
it
that
way
and
that
other
cities
have
permanent
fixtures
for
bike
lanes
that
don't
so
I'm
wondering
in
the
actual
official
master
plan,
it
doesn't
explicitly
say
I,
assume
that
we
could
go
either
way.
E
Is
that
correct?
We
could
have
permanent
have
separating
physical
features
in
our
right
of
ways,
rights
of
way
that
wouldn't
be
removed
for
winter
control.
It
would
just
require
us
to
have
specialized
equipment-
small
enough
sidewalk
plows,
for
example,
to
separately
near
the
the
bike
lanes
from
the
roadways.
Is
that
correct.
Y
His
three-year
worship-
yes
in
the
so
the
active
transportation
master
plan,
speaks
to
speaks
to
both
building
the
infrastructure
that
the
city
would
build
for
active
transportation,
but
also
that
the
city
would
look
at
operating
and
maintaining
it,
including
including
the
necessary
means
to
do
that
year
round.
So
it's
but
I
think
it
also.
The
the
plan
also
sort
of
recommends
that
we
are
in
some
of
early
stages
of
that
so
well
what
the
city
has
implemented
to
date.
Y
It's
identifying
a
winter
cycling,
Network
and
the
maintenance
efforts
across
that
network
were
enhanced
over
the
last
season
and
we
would
sort
of
review
that
and
then
develop
other
pieces
from
that.
So
there
are
no
concrete
plans
at
this
time
to
provide
a
network
of
on
street
bollards.
That
would
be
in
place
year-round,
but
that
is
certainly
something
that
can
be
considered
in
in.
E
E
So
so
that
is
an
ongoing
mo
of
the
KCAP
and
I'm
happy
to
see
that
involved,
I'm
saying
that
captain
Neal's
concerns
would
be
founded
if
we
weren't
sure
that
the
proponent
coming
forward
to
volunteer
to
do
this
work
was
impacted,
did
not
in
fact
have
a
track
record
of
full
public
consultation.
That's
that
does
so
I'm
satisfied
with
that
aspect,
so
in
general
this
is
skeptical
Holland,
said
sort
of
a
sort
of
a
to
pilot.
It
doesn't
believe
me
if
there's
no
speed
limit,
there's
no
physical,
immobile
barriers.
There's
there's
temporary
there.
E
It's
like
it's
all,
very
temporary
and
very
they're,
not
tentative,
but
it's
it's
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
it's
not
it's
not
going
all
the
way
to
helping
the
PPA
users
back
to
transportation,
but
it's
the
start
of
the
conversation
that
started
an
attempt
in
the
right
direction
and
you
gotta
you
gotta
start
somewhere,
and
you
know
the
step,
wait
and
small.
If
it's
in
the
right
direction,
you
can
see
another
step
coming
in
the
future.
E
A
X
X
Their
habit
is
to
talk
to
everybody.
Their
approach
is
a
collaborative
way,
so
there
there's
no
doubt
that
they
will
be
reaching
out
to
the
district
councillors,
but
it
is
also
important
to
to
thank
Kay
CAD
and
recognize
that
the
amount
of
work
that
they're
going
to
take
on
when
we
approve
this
motion
kapok,
is,
is
committed
to
this
and
they
are
going
to
need
a
lot
of
volunteers
to
make
this
success.
X
Our
entire
community
and
city,
including
Anne,
Stafford
and
transportation
staff,
will
benefit
from
this,
because
this
pilot
project
is
an
opportunity
to
learn
a
lot
and
we
have
the
community
initiating
this.
So
this
is
a
really
exciting
collaborative
effort
between
the
community
and
the
city.
So
I'm
really
grateful
for
KCAP.
A
U
This
is
motion.
Number
three
is
where
Patterson
indicated
as
part
of
your
addendum,
so
moved
by
Eric
Patterson
seconded
by
Councillor
Chappell,
whereas
the
Federation
of
Canadian
Municipalities
has
established
a
grant
opportunities
for
the
municipal
asset
management
program
and
whereas
the
City
of
Kingston
plans
to
apply
for
eligible
project
costs.
Totaling
$100,000
of
the
city
of
kingston
is
eligible
to
receive
up
to
a
maximum
of
$50,000
in
grant
contributions
toward
the
total
eligible
project
cost
and
whereas
the
council
resolution
of
council
is
required
as
part
of
the
grant
application
process
committing
to
the
municipalities.
U
Assessments
of
various
municipal
facilities,
number
two
conditions,
assessment
and
capital
planning
for
building
energy
systems
and
number
three
long-term
financial
modeling
to
support
asset
management
decisions
and
the
City
of
Kingston
has
allocated
$50,000
from
approved
capital
budget
envelopes
toward
the
cost
of
this
initiative.
Eric
Patterson.
A
Thank
you
very
much
deputy
mayor
I
think
the
motion
is
self-explanatory.
This
is
a
grant
opportunity
for
the
city
of
Kingston,
where
essentially,
as
council,
must
spell
out
the
terms
and
also
that
we
agree
to
cover
our
share.
If
FCM
gives
us
the
remaining
remaining
grant
money,
so
I
think
I'll
leave
it
up.
There.
V
R
U
A
A
Absolutely
councillor
Kiley's,
so
I
think
that
there
are
there
essentially
two
advantages
to
having
a
representative
from
this
Council
on
the
Aimie
board.
So
number
one
is
to
be
able
to
take
Kingston,
specific
concerns
and
ideas
and
directions
to
the
aim
award
and
ensure
that
they're
included
within
the
discussions
that
are
happening
with
the
provincial
government.
So,
for
example,
over
the
last
year,
there's
been
discussion
on
remember
bill
108,
so
everything
from
changes
to
the
l
pad
changes
to
community
benefits
community
benefit
charges.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
stuff
under
that
planning
environment,
where
we
had
very
specific
views
as
a
council
and
as
a
community
and
as
a
city,
and
so
it
gave
me
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
there
was
a
real
platform
and
that
those
views
were
included
in
those
discussions
with
ministers.
The
second
piece
I
think
that
I
would
highlight
would
be
the
discussions
around
a
reform
of
public
health.
A
Remember,
of
course,
that
the
province
had
initiated
consultation
to
very
much
change.
What
public
health
would
look
like
again.
Kingston
had
a
very
specific
ask
an
idea
about
exactly
what
we
wanted
in
terms
of
public
health
representation
again
having
that
chance
to
be
able
to
communicate
that
directly,
not
only
do
the
rest
of
the
board,
but
then
ensure
that
that
was
passed.
A
I
think
that
the
the
first
advantage
is
is
myself
being
able
to
take
what
I
hear
from
this
table
and
direct
it
to
Anil.
The
other
advantage
is
the
other
way
around
for
me
being
able
to
sit
around
the
award
means
that
I
can
get
information
and
insight
and
detail
faster
than
we
would
otherwise
maybe
get
through
an
ammo
update.
A
Many
of
the
challenges
that
we're
grappling
with
are
shared
by
in
many
other
communities
across
the
province,
so
being
able
to
compare
notes
with
them
being
able
to
quickly
form
alliances
so
that
we
can
push
the
province
right
now.
The
top
of
the
agenda
is
pushing
for
additional
funding
for
municipalities,
because,
of
course,
we
know
that
we
have
to
run
a
balanced
budget
and
we
need
help
from
the
problems.
A
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
the
big
things
that
we're
pushing
on
for
right
now
and
I
have
a
board
meeting
to
discuss
that
on
Friday,
so
I
think
kalsekar.
That's
probably
the
best
way
that
I
think
I
can
respond
with
those
I
do
think
that
there's
a
real
advantage
to
Kingston.
If,
if
I
can
continue
to
retain
that
representation.
C
A
A
Then,
because
I
also
sit
on
the
the
organisation
of
mayors
of
the
big
city,
mayors
in
Ontario
being
able
to
also
do
the
same
thing
and
create
that
alignment
as
well.
So
this
is
all
really
about.
How
do
we
push
priorities
for
cities
like
Kingston
weather?
Sometimes
we
identify
more
with
the
larger
cities
in
Ontario.
Sometimes
we
identify
more
with
the
cities
within
our
region,
but
being
able
to
play
both
of
those
to
be
able
to
put
forward
our
priorities
because
I
think
in
this
environment.
If
Kingston
goes
alone,
our
our
impact
is
is
limited.
A
A
B
A
E
Thank
you,
worship.
This
shouldn't,
take
long
put
it
out
there
to
you
guys
because
I
you
know,
I
haven't
seen
any
of
you
in
three
months.
They
christened
me
and
now
we're
phase.
Two
are
we
thinking
about
when
we
might
move
logically,
maybe
to
the
Memorial
Hall
physical
distance,
same
type
council
set
up
with
a
huge
room
and
everybody
two
or
three
media.
That's
apart
or
whatever
are
we
thinking
of
getting
back
to
in-person
council
council
meetings
anytime
soon.
C
E
E
But
what
we're
doing
is
everybody's
wearing
masks
and
they're
within
two
meters
of
each
other,
which
is
pretty
much
all
the
time
and
all
patient
care
is
that's
Monday
yesterday,
and
that
coincides
with
the
Phase
two
reopening
of
all
the
community
things
so
I'm
just
wondering
a
if
we're
doing
the
same
thing
as
an
institution
and
thinking
how
we're
going
to
transition
back
to
more
normal
activities
at
City,
Hall
and
and
what
safety
measures
we
need
to
think
about.
I,
don't
know
if
any
staff
number
one
who
addresses.
M
Thank
you
and
through
you,
so
we
are
keeping
an
eye
on
this
and
watching
right
now
the
limitation
is
still
10
private
meetings.
You
can
go
above
the
ten
with
physical
testing
distancing,
but
public
meetings
you're
still
unable
to
go
beyond
the
number
of
ten,
but
we,
but
we
are
going
to
be
continuing
to
keep
an
eye
on
this.