►
Description
Nominations Committee meeting from December 7, 2022. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3VW3x2G
A
B
B
Oh
you're
moving
okay!
Well,
that
certainly
makes
things
easier.
Do
we
have
any
but
any
Challengers?
Okay?
So
we
have
a
mover
from
counselor
Hassan
for
councilor
tozo
as
Vice
chair.
Do
we
have
a
secondary
and
counselor
Amos
and
all
those
in
favor
and
that
carries
okay
with
that
I
will
hand
it
over
to
you,
councilor
McLaren,
to
call.
E
D
E
All
right,
thank
you.
So
an
extra
monsters
is
called
the
meeting
order.
Approval
of
the
agenda
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
do
this
in
Reverse
as
I'm.
Looking
at
this
list,
it's
gonna
it
starts
off
with
one
recommend,
it's
one,
then
two,
then
three,
then
five
and
five
and
six
and
six
and
seven
and
seven
and
eight
it's
going
to
become
more
and
more
complicated
as
we
move
along.
E
So
it's
easier
to
start,
so
you
can
see
how
the
process
goes
if
we
start
with
the
simplest
one
and
then
move
on
to
the
more
complicated
ones,
because
I
understand
how
we're
going
to
be
doing
this,
we're
going
to
be
putting
our
short
list
forward
for
each
and
every
candidate
we're
going
to
be
voting
depending
on
the
number
of
candidates,
so
the
higher
the
number
of
candidates
needed,
for
example.
The
first
committee
needs
15.
E
D
E
E
E
Are
we
increasing
diversity?
Do
we
have
too
much
in
One
Direction
and
then
maybe
reconsider?
Is
that
all
right
with
all
of
you
so
we're
talking
about
these
Services
report
right
now
we're
talking
about
all
of
them?
Okay,
yes,
so
the
idea
is
at
an
individual
level.
We
may
find
the
most
competent
people
yeah
and
they
may
all
be
quite
middle
class
yeah.
So
we
want
to
increase
diversity.
D
E
E
E
E
E
E
C
E
Sorry
number
22.
also
nominated
anyone
else
wish
to
nominate
some
okay.
So
what
happens
now
is
we
have
one
vote?
You
can
vote
for
either.
One
of
these
two
people
in
this
case
it'll
be
very
simple.
The
majority
person
gets
the
position,
we'll
probably
only
have
one
round
so
all
in
favor
of
number
18.
Please
raise
your
hands
so
I
see
four.
All
in
favor
of
22.
D
E
C
E
E
E
E
E
E
None
number
29,
you
see
one.
So
what
happens
now
we
accept
the
highest
numbered
person
and
we
drop
off
the
lowest
numbered
person,
so
the
lowest
numbered
person
was
number
27.
They
are
no
longer
to
be
voted
on.
The
highest
numbered
person
was
number
two
he
was
now
officially
on.
Does
everybody
see
that
so
we're
going
to
cross
those
two
names
out
foreign.
E
E
Based
on
that,
we
have
a
tie
for
first,
so
we
will
only
cut
out
number
13,
which
had
only
one
vote,
and
we
will
proceed
for
another
round
between
number
five
and
number
29..
Does
anybody
want
to
take
a
brief
look
at
their
files
or
your
notes
on
them
to
see
which
one
you
may
prefer
will
give
you
30
seconds
and
then
we'll
do
a
final
round
between
number
five
and
number
29.
B
Mr,
chair
may
I
make
a
suggestion,
just
thinking
of
the
people
who
might
be
viewing
at
home
and
the
numbers
say
the
numbers
only
might
not
make
it
transparent
or
obvious
to
the
people
watching
at
home,
which
individuals
were
speaking
about.
So
in
the
past
we
had
tried
to
use
number
and
name
just
so
that
you
know
anybody
who's
watching
along
at.
E
So
we'll
use
numbers
until
they're
actually
on
the
nomination.
At
that
point
we
will
use
names
if
you're
going
to
speak
to
one
of
them
positively
or
negatively.
Let's
use
the
number
positively
that's
username
sounds
good,
so
we
are
at
the
stage
where
we're
choosing
between
number
five
Matthew
Campbell
and
number
29.
E
E
C
A
E
D
E
E
D
H
D
E
E
B
G
E
D
E
E
H
E
E
E
A
B
Yeah
there
weren't
any
members
of
rural
advisory
committee
included
on
your
addendum,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that,
based
on
what
council's
decision
was
last
night
with
regards
to
Heritage
Kingston,
we
will
be
recruiting
for
the
two
new
Heritage
committees.
So
if
this
committee
wished,
you
could
defer
consideration
of
the
applications
for
Rural
advisory
committee,
direct
staff
to
go
out
and
do
further
recruitment,
we
will
be
doing
a
further
recruitment
for
the
Heritage
Kingston
committees
anyway.
B
So
to
add
this
on,
it
would
give
us
the
ability
to
Target
more
directly,
some
of
our
our
rural
Community,
just
because
of
the
timing
with
when
the
election
was
and
when
we
had
this
had
to
have
this
meeting.
There
wasn't
a
lot
of
time
to
do
some
targeted
Outreach.
We
have
found
that
that
sometimes
some
targeted
Outreach
with
the
you
know,
specific
mail-outs
to
rural
residence
does
help
increase
the
number
of
applications.
B
Based
on
the
timing
that
we've
established
for
the
recruitment
for
those
Heritage
committees,
it
would
not
affect
the
continuation
of
rural
advisory
committee.
They
are
not
expected
to
meet
until
the
end
of
March
and
we
anticipate
being
able
to
have
another
meeting
of
this
committee
for
those
Heritage
appointments,
and
we
could
include
rural
advisory
at
the
time
and
it
would
be
toward-
and
we
would
have
those
done
at
this
committee
and
up
to
council
by
the
end
of
February.
So
there
wouldn't
be
any
sort
of
negative
ramifications
that
way.
F
B
F
H
E
H
E
H
B
Would
suggest
that
that
might
not
be
the
best
idea,
because
if
you
only
appoint
two
people
to
the
committee,
we
would
not
have
the
ability
to
meet
Quorum.
So
if
there
was
a
need
for
the
committee
to
meet
before
its
next
scheduled
meeting,
we're
not
going
to
have
a
full
committee
to
be
able
to
do
that.
Our
nominations
process
does
mean
that
the
the
current
composition
of
the
rural
advisory
committee
stays
in
place
until
the
new
members
are
acquainted.
B
So
from
a
from
a
process
point
of
view,
I
think
it
would
be
ideal
to
leave
the
current
members
in
place.
So
if
there
is
a
need
to
consult
with
the
rural
community,
the
rural
advisory
committee,
we
have
the
ability
to
do
that
with
the
current
membership.
And
then
we
can
consider
a
new
membership
when
we
come
back
in
February.
That
sounds
reasonable,
but
it
is
still
up
for
the
committee
is
to
push
that.
F
B
B
A
A
D
E
F
E
E
E
D
D
E
E
E
E
D
E
A
C
A
A
D
E
B
E
E
E
E
H
A
I
mean
all
these
candidates
are
great
yeah
I.
This
is
going
to
be
such
a
huge
trial
for
this
Council
and
it's
important
that
we
get
some
really
great
voices
on
on
this
committee,
so
I
mean
and
I
we
I
feel
really
challenged
by
the
fact.
We
only
have
five
choices
to
make
because,
but
the
ignore
voices
on
this
committee,
because
this
is
very
very
I
found
this
was
a
very
hard
committee
to
narrow
down.
My
list
was
extensive
and
I
looked
at
this
early
and
so
on.
E
D
E
E
D
C
E
E
E
H
E
D
H
H
E
C
C
F
F
E
E
E
B
B
That,
with
the
the
establishment
of
the
new
public
employment
policy,
the
committee
does
have
the
option
to
appoint
a
reserve
pool
of
members.
I
should
have
gone
home
earlier.
My
apologies,
so
it'd
be
a
good
opportunity
to
start
with
this
one
if
there
are
and
if
there's
not
a
limitation,
so
you
could
appoint
one
two
three,
as
many
as
you
felt.
B
The
committee
just
needs
to
pass
a
motion
sort
of
indicating
to
staff
what
order
the
backup
pool
we
should
contact
them
in
okay.
So
you
know
there's
four
people
you
can.
Let
us
know.
You
know
number
one
number,
two
number
seven
number
eight
kind
of
thing
and
we
will
have
those
names
in
reserve.
So,
if
somebody's
not
able
to
you
know
if
they
resign
from
the
committee
because
they
you
know,
they're
not
allowed
to
make.
B
F
B
A
B
E
D
E
E
North
Kingstown
secondary
plans,
Community
working
groups;
we
need
six
appointees
and
we
have
a
choice
of
12..
So
I
have
a
group
I'd
like
to
put
forward.
Go
ahead.
Number
two
number:
two
Mary
Ferrar
number
four
number:
four
Roger
Huey
number
five
number:
five
and
Logie
number:
eight
number:
eight
Leslie
Morley,
number,
nine
number,
nine
Richard,
Moulton
and
number
11.
and
number
11
Jamie
Swift.
E
E
Who
is
currently
on
the
planning
advisor
committee?
Well,
we
can
deal
with
that
later.
Okay,
so
essentially,
there
are
two
people
who
are
not
on
so
I
will
read
the
list.
Number
two
Mary
Ferrar
number
three
Lindsay
Foster
number:
four
Roger
Healey
number:
five
and
Loki
number:
six
Paul
Martin
number:
seven
Jeremy
Malloy
number,
eight
Leslie,
Morley,
number,
nine
Richard,
Moulton
numbers;
11,
Jamie,
Swift,
number,
12,
Greg
Tilson!
E
Richard
Moulton
one
more
time,
one:
two:
three
four:
five:
five
foreign
number
11
Jamie
Swift,
six
number
12,
Greg,
Tilson,
two
okay,
so
I
can
confirm
that
Mary
Ferrar
is
on
the
committee.
Roger
Healey
is
on
the
committee
with
five
votes
and
low
heat
with
four
votes:
number
nine
Richard
Moulton
with
five
votes;
Jamie
Swift,
with
six
votes.
E
E
Jeremy
Malloy
six,
six
Paul
Martin
was
right.
He
got
one
vote
so
sorry,
let
me
start
that
again.
Let
me
just
change
my
ink
here
and
go
with
a
different
one,
so
that
maybe
that'll
make
more
sense:
okay,
Lindsay
Foster,
Paul,
Martin,
Jeremy,
Malloy
and
Greg
Tilson
four
choices.
One
vote
does
anybody
wish
to
advocate
for
any
of
them
or
against
any
of
them
all
right?
E
E
E
So
once
again
we
don't
have
a
full
complement
of
the
thing,
but
we
can
at
least
cross
off
Paul
Martin,
since
he
got
no
votes,
leaving
a
list
of
three
and
Z
Foster
German
Malloy
Greg
Tilson.
At
this
point,
I
mean
I
suggest
that
we
take
Greg
Tilson,
who
got
the
most
votes
and
put
the
other
two
as
spares
reserves
reserves.
My
potencies.
A
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
E
F
E
C
B
B
E
E
A
If
I
could
Advocate
Brian,
Hamburg
I've
known
for
a
long
time,
he's
from
an
80
million
dollar
firm
I
think
when
we're
dealing
with
housing
and
he's
good
at
management,
I
think
would
be
a
good
person
to
have
on
that
committee.
Who's
that
Brian
number
11.,
I
I,
trust
him
yeah
I'm,
not
immensely
and
I.
Think
if
we're
looking
at
large
organizations.
A
C
On
the
commit
on
the
board,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Very
much.
I
will
speak
about
Constantine.
It's
also
did
it's
been
working
a
lot
of
long
time
on
the
social
side,
with
the
public
and
involved
in
his
community,
a
lot
he's
a
business
owner.
He
understand
the
credit
crisis
of
key
houses
and
homelessness
in
the
city,
also
as
part
of
the
visible
minority
with
the
community,
well
educated
and
well
involved
on
his
side
of
the
query,
work.
E
E
E
G
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
E
F
D
E
A
E
A
A
Just
point
out
as
well
that
there
was
correspondence
received
from
the
CEO
of
the
library
board,
similar
to
the
housing
board.
Their
board
is
going
through
some
turnover
as
well
so
I
believe
only
two
incumbents
have
applied
so
I
believe.
There's
just
ask
to
take
that
continuity
into
consideration
when
the
committee
was
making
its
choices
and
I
will
leave
it
at
that,
and.
C
E
A
D
B
A
A
H
E
A
E
D
E
E
E
H
C
H
A
D
B
Mr
chair,
if
I
could
offer
something
just
from
a
procedural
point
of
view,
I
do
note
that
that
both
incumbents
have
reapplied
and
have
been
shortlisted
just
to
point
out.
The
the
way
in
which
the
library
board
is
appointed
is
for
the
entire
term
of
council.
They
don't
have
staggered
terms
like
a
number
of
our
other
committees,
so
just
in
terms
of
continuity,
those
are
the
only
two
members
of
this
committee
who
would
be
returning.
E
E
B
E
F
Forward,
yes,
I,
agree.
I,
also
understand
that
most
people
the
misconception
of
this
board,
it's
not
that
they
don't
deal
with
operation,
so
they're,
more
policy
governance.
Yes,
so
people
believe
they're
coming
in
for
operations
and
sometimes
do
vacate
so
having
a
reserve
a
list.
I
think
it
would
be
highly
recommended.
F
D
A
F
A
D
E
D
E
E
E
D
E
E
E
E
F
D
A
E
D
E
C
D
E
E
H
A
E
A
D
E
D
A
A
D
E
B
E
A
D
A
D
E
E
E
A
E
A
A
B
F
H
E
E
F
F
A
E
A
E
A
G
B
B
E
A
F
E
A
I've
met
him
as
well
and
he's
a
strong,
Advocate
and
I
think
yeah.
Thank
you
for
reminding
me
I
think
he'd
be
great
on
the
committee.
I
also
think
that
that
some
degree
even
come
and
see
would
be
would
be
helpful
on
this
one
yeah,
so
I
yeah
leave
me
a
lot
of
Rachel,
for
example,
would
be
I
think
in
David
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
on
the
committee
in
his
call
to
have
some
great
opportunity
absolutely.
E
B
A
F
E
Bob,
sorry,
that
was
two
then
yeah.
Alan
white
is
two
number
27
Bob
Young
one
okay,
so
I
can
say
with
confidence
that
we
have
seven
members
of
the
eight
okay
lugilia
Aguilera,
with
six
Rachel
Alaska,
with
six
Jessica
Campbell,
also
with
six
Diane
Corrigan,
with
five
Josh
Cowan
with
six
David
Stokes
with
five
and
Jacka
seriana
is
five
leaving
one
space
available
and
a
choice
of
one
two,
three
four:
the
choices
we
have
before
us
are
14
Reza,
Jamshed,.
E
G
E
D
E
B
A
E
E
E
E
A
We've
noted
on
there
the
incumbents
that
have
applied
for
the
the
ketco
representative
is
fairly
obvious,
but
there
is
one
for
the
institutional
Community,
the
incumbent
reapplied,
their
staff
member
at
Queens,
the
business
Community
again
very
ambiguous,
but
that
their
incumbent
applied
is
there's
also
a
first
people's
representative
to
which
the
incumbent
did
not
apply.
So
for
those
four,
the
committee
can
either
choose
the
incumbent
or,
if
there's
somebody
who
say
meets
what
the
committee
feels
is
the
business
Community
representative,
but
is
in
the
geographic
category.
A
You
may
pick
that
person
as
a
business
Community
representative,
if
there's
somebody
in
there
who
identified
in
their
application
that
perhaps
they
would
be
a
suitable
first
people
representative,
you
could
do
that
as
well.
The
committee
could
do
that.
So,
okay,
it's
just
it's
a
bit
ambiguous.
So
we
felt
that
an
explanation
would
be
helpful.
E
Thank
you
so
may
I
suggest
that
we
do
these
geographical
ones
first
and
then
we
do
the
other
ones
and
we
can
choose
from
the
whole
list
of
two
graphical
ones,
except
for
the
one
that
we
have
already
chosen
for
each
one
of
those
Geographic
geographies.
Does
that
sound,
reasonable?
Okay,
in
that
case,.
E
B
E
So
we
have
a
shortened
list
unless
people
wish
to
nominate
them.
We
have
a
short
list
of
two
three
four
and
five
launcher.
Yes,
I
would
like
to
nominate
number
four
in
Kimberly
faucet
Smith
I
worked
with
her
on
the
military
base.
She
is
a
fantastic
person,
very
diligent
and
very
hard
working.
She
would
represent
the
committee
one
and
it's
her
first
preference
anyone
else,
foreign.
E
A
E
D
C
C
Again,
it's
a
visible
minority
group,
religiously,
ethnically
and
very
active
in
his
school
in
his
college.
I
know
him
from
high
school
and
then
his
family
as
well.
They
are
very,
very
active
in
in
their
family
in
their
group,
not
only
athletic
group
but
the
overall,
the
community
that
they
are
very
very
act.
What's
he
studying
I
I
think
he's
doing
something.
Science
is
a
computer
science.
Okay,
he
invented
a
couple
years
ago
in.
C
Email
box,
this
people
can
operate
through
their
phone
and
you
know
people
can
drop
there,
especially
for
the
Middle
East
areas
where
the
people
live
far
away
from
the
cities
and
they
they
can
receive
their
valuable
things.
Medicine
and
stuff
like
like
that,
the
mailbox
the
the
meal
delivery
person
will
go
open
up
and
put
in
there.
No,
nobody
can
open.
They
have
code
on
it.
C
It's
just
like
through
internet,
the
mailbox
will
be
upgraded
through
internet
has
the
camera
and
everything
everything
he
invented
that
when
he
was
in
the
high
school
and
his
father
invented
a
ventilator
locally
here
in
Kingston
he's
also
a
PhD
and
working
in
the
queen
and
I.
Think
teaching
now
Saint,
Lawrence
College,
so
they're,
both
Father
and
Son,
invented
the
local
ventilator
during
the
pandemic.
D
E
H
B
A
D
B
E
E
Just
pick
a
note
here
that
he's
going
to
be
on
special
he'll,
be
on
for
a
special
reason
at
a
different
point
in
this
video
okay,
so
that
that
these
are
my
smart
alert
lists.
Does
anybody
want
to
recommend
anyone
else
or
sorry
recommend
somebody
I
have
a
sort.
You
have
nobody
there.
Sorry
counselor
famous
I
would
recommend
Sam
Davies.
E
B
E
D
E
E
A
D
A
A
H
B
H
F
H
E
E
E
F
B
E
D
G
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
C
B
Just
reviewing
that,
so
it
says
unless
otherwise
specified
in
a
committee
mandate
or
terms
of
preference.
An
initial
appointments
to
an
advisory
committee
will
be
for
a
term
of
two
years.
So
in
this
case
it
does
say
staggered
terms
of
one
two
or
three
years,
so
anybody
who's,
it
is
their
initial
term.
B
They
will
be
appointed
for
a
one-year
term
if
they
are
returning
for
their
second
go
round,
they
will
get
a
two-year
term
and
if
they
are
coming
to
their
third,
then
they'll
get
another
one
year,
because
the
maximum
term
of
appointment
is
four
years
yeah
and
there
there
may
be
sort
of
some
outliers
there.
If,
if
somebody's
you
know,
even
if
they're
returning,
if
they've
already
served
two
years,
you
know
something
for
more
than
two
or
if
they,
you
know,
if
they
serve
three
weeks,
so
that
we
don't
exceed
that
maximum
four
years.
E
C
A
A
D
A
B
Who
don't
have
a
disability
themselves
but
have
an
interest
in
that
area,
maybe
because
of
a
family
member,
maybe
because
of
their
professional
background.
You
know
an
area
that
they
volunteer
in
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up,
because
that's
a
that
is
a
requirement
to
make
sure
that
at
least
half
of
the
committee
members
are
living
with
a
disability.
Well
and.
F
D
A
D
B
A
Number
14
Darcy,
King
McKay,
of
course
15
Penny
LeClaire.
Can
you
look
there?
17
Susan
lockler,
Susan,
mockler,
18,
Lucille,
musu,
Lucille,
musu,
21,
Nicholas,
polygessi,
told
Jessie,
told
Jesse,
Yeah
and
22
Janice
Wilton
and
that's
15.
and
I
will
sort
of
make
a
correction.
Elliott
Chappelle
was
selected
as
a
reserve
to
EDI,
so
my
apologies
and
then
I
would
also
select,
which.
E
D
D
B
C
D
D
E
C
H
D
D
D
E
B
They're
they're
candy,
but
because
of
the
large
number
on
the
committee,
if
we
do
have
to
go
and
do
recruitment,
it's
not
such
you
know,
there's
one
person
or
two
people
who
can't
make
it
we're
not
in
such
Jeopardy
of
losing
quality
takes
just
because
of
the
size
of
the
the
committee.
So
if
there's
only
one
person
to
appoint
as
a
reserve,
that's
that's
fine.
F
B
B
E
E
One
of
the
things
that
happened
last
term
diversity
was
reduced
on
a
few
occasions,
they're
truffles.
So
it's
important
that
we
look
back
at
the
committee
through
at
least
four
intersectionalities
as
much
as
we
can
tell
so.
We
have
gender
parity.
Do
we
have
for
four
intersectionalities
gender
race
class
and
age.
E
If
anybody
as
we
look
through
these
numbers
or
through
these
names,
can
we
go
through
the
first
one
recommend
women
that's
a
little
easier,
sometimes
not
always
because
you
can
always
tell
from
the
name.
You
can't
always
tell
the
age
or
anything
like
that,
but
if
you
see
or
if
you
know
of
any
this
I
guess
unfair
balance,
it
would
be
a
good
time
to
point
it
out
now,
so
we
can
avoid
it
for
Buffalo
at
a
later
date.
C
E
The
the
point
of
this
exercise
is
that
last
time
everybody
thought
that
as
well,
when
you
look
at
it
on
an
individual
basis,
you
say
yeah.
This
is
good.
This
is
good.
This
is
good,
but
when
you
look
at
it
in
a
holistic
view,
it's
a
very
different
view.
It
sometimes
can
be
a
very
different
view
if
they
correspond.
This
is
good
news.
If
they
don't
correspond.
E
E
F
E
E
A
D
A
B
Well,
I
would
say
the
direction
of
council
wasn't
I
want
to
say
clear,
but
it
wasn't
specific
right,
they're,
looking
to
make
sure
that
membership
on
our
boards
and
committees
is
in
parody
with
the
you
know,
the
the
community,
so
I
would
say
maybe
in
the
aggregate
just
because
you
know,
if
you
look
at
one
section
of
our
community,
if
you
look
at
it
from
a
geographic
point
of
view,
you
may
not
need
to.
You
know,
get
your
parody
Or.
That
kind
of
thing
so
I
think
in
the
aggregate
yeah.
A
F
F
C
E
B
We
didn't
have
anybody
fill
that
out
this
this
time
it
often
hasn't
been
well
used
because
we
find
that
and-
and
that
would
be
if
we'd
received
those
those
would
have
been
distributed
confidentially
to
the
to
the
committee.
That
didn't
happen
in
this
case,
because
you
know
we
didn't
have
any
applicants
who
filled
those
out.
We've
we've
found
that
you
know
people
are
generally
comfortable
saying
on
their
application.
What
it
is
sharing.
C
C
A
B
F
G
I
would
Echo
what
Janet
has
said
that
I
would
caution
this
Committee
in
exercising
this
at
this
point,
it's
it's
really
very
like
it's.
It's
a
hairline
situation
like
we.
We
are
at
a
very
borderline
when
we
make
decision
based
on
that,
so
I'll
I
will
just
Echo
what
Janice
just
said
that
you
know
like.
A
How
to
have
committees
without
self-disclosure,
because
I,
at
least
with
my
short
list
I
tried
to
look
at
his
intersectionality
of
different
types
of
ways
of
doing
it,
but
we
had
self-disclosure
we're
really
kind
of
limited
on
what
we
know
of
it.
Members
on
the
committee,
so
that
might
be
actually
something
we
could
get
an
equity
committee
to
look
at.
Yes,
when
we
meet
and.
F
I'll
also
add
that,
from
my
previous
life
and
and
being
close
contact
and
relationship
with
our
chaplain
safe
department
and
in
different
groups,
just
because
someone's
name
is
generally
tagged
with
a
certain
religion,
sometimes
they
will
move
to
a
different
religion
or
indigenous
culture
beliefs.
So
we
can't
go
by
last
name
either
or
first
name,
because
as
they
progress
in
our
Enlightenment
or
or
maybe
with
relationships,
they
can
choose
to
change
their
religious
beliefs.
B
F
F
D
C
F
D
D
F
F
C
C
E
A
certain
requirement
by
Council,
so
we
were
told
that
we
weren't,
given
we
were
told
to
do
it
by
Council,
so
we're
following
Council
direction.
To
do
this
second
look
kind
of
stuff,
okay,
How,
We,
Do
It
was
not
prescribed.
I
suggested
these
four
intersectionalities.
It
looks
like
you,
don't
have
information
for
at
least
three
of
them.
We
have
enough
for
one
gender
after
based.
A
Plus
community
and
regards
to
indigenous
at
least
one
at
least
one
thank
you
and
to
counselor
Hassan's
point
I.
Think
that
that
really
religious
lens
would
be
useful
in
determining
future
appointments,
but
I
think
without
without
that
type
of
information
disclosed
right
would
be
challenging
for
us
to
take
that
as
a
lens
of
it.
A
To
you
know
that
sense
of
of
inclusion
and
looking
at
a
multitude
of
different
ways,
especially
if
we
actively
seek
this
in
this
type
of
which
we
are
looking
for
so
seeing
people
having
diverse
political
views
like
we
don't
know
that
anybody's
politics
here
that
might
be
a
useful
lens.
We
can
speculate
on
some
aspects
of
these
things,
but
I
think
it
requires
further
replying
going
forward.
But
I
think
your
point
is
very
well
taken
because.
B
E
A
Right
choices:
yes,
as
we're
going
in
with
the
information
we
have,
but
the
information
we
have
requires
a
degree
of
self-disclosure
I
also
recognize
if
you're
coming
from
a
historically
marginalized
Community
or
one
that
has
been
how
hard
that
it
would
be
to
disclose
to
a
level
of
government,
because
I
can
understand
that
they've
not
always
had
the
best
relationships.
So.
E
E
B
A
Yeah
I
I,
if
I
could
make
a
point,
I,
don't
I
think
if
we
look
in
the
aggregate,
I
I
think
that
that
would
be
useful,
but
without
further
direction
from
Council
I.
Don't
think
I'd
be
comfortable
going
committee
by
committee,
communities,
I
think
we've
done
the
best
with
the
information
we
have
a
lenses
that
we
have,
but
we
we
did
a
vote
based
on
it
and
I
think
we
should
stand
and
we.
E
All
did
our
due
diligence,
so
we
all
did
our
due
diligence
in
walking
through
the
resumes
as
best
we
could
yeah.
We
all
brought
prepared
notes
to
advocate
for
the
ones
we
thought
would
be
best
suited,
so
I
think
I
think
we
put
the
best
people
we
can
in
each
of
these
days.
That's
for
sure,
judging
by
our
voting
process,
there.
D
E
No
real
animosity
amongst
us,
we
really
I
thought
we
worked
through
it
very,
very,
very
well
and
I
think
we've
done
I
think
going
back
through
it.
A
second
time
would
just
create
a
sense
of
potential
frustration
for
us.
So
what
I'm
hearing
is
we
can
stop
this
now
and
that
staff
are
already
on
this,
so
we
don't
have
to
make
any
more
recommendations.
Yeah.
G
A
D
F
How
does
everyone
else
feel
and
I
don't
think
we
could
force
that's
been
stated.
We
can't
force
him
to
acknowledge
any
private
information
and,
as
I
mentioned
in
one
of
the
previous
committees,
it's
hard
to
be
diverse.
If
we
don't
get
the
diversity
in
applications
like.
If
one
committee
was
all
female,
then
we
don't
have
to
reverse,
because
that's
all
the
applications
so
we're
also
hand
Tied
by
that
limited
in
our
choices.
Yes,
the
applicants.
Yes,
so
there
are
two
issues
there.
A
B
I'll
let
Muhammad
weigh
in
as
well
I
think
the
committee
has
has
taken.
You
know.
You
know
an
extremely
good
look
at
all
of
the
all
of
the
candidates,
as
councilor
shaves
has
pointed
out.
In
some
cases
you
know
you're
you're,
in
all
cases,
you're
limited
to
the
applications
you
have,
but
in
some
cases
there
was
not
gender
parity
in
the
applications
you
received.
B
So
it
was
more
difficult
to
maybe
achieve
gender
parity
in
in
those
cases
I'm
just
using
gender
as
an
example,
but
I
do
think
this
committee
has
has
taken
a
really
good
look
at
the
applications
that
they
have
you've
had
good
discussions
around
the
table
tonight,
which
is
why,
when
the
question
was
asked
about
you
know,
is
it
the
in
the
aggregate
or
is
it
by
committee?
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
it
as
in
the
aggregate.
B
Depending
on
the
applications
you
get,
you
might
never
be
able
to
meet
all
of
those
all
of
those
requirements.
So
so
that's
why
you
know
I
was
saying
you
know:
yeah,
you
do
the
best
you
can
with
the
the
information
and
the
applications
you
have
and
I'll
look
turn
it
over
to
Muhammad
I
see
he
has
a
stand
up.
Yeah.