►
From YouTube: Kingston, Ontario - Planning Committee - July 14, 2022
Description
Planning Committee meeting from July 14, 2022. For full meeting agenda visit https://bit.ly/3z9NuGb
A
Excellent,
thank
you.
So
much
before
we
get
started
with
choosing
a
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
to
confirm
that
we
do
have
quorum.
We
do
have
members
from
staff
present
tonight.
We've
got
tim
park
director
of
planning
services,
james
barr
manager
of
development
approvals,
janiece
grant
senior
planner
mike
zlaggy
planner,
ian
sullivan,
is
our
meeting
host
for
this
evening
and
I'm
elizabeth
foster.
I
am
the
committee
clerk
for
planning
committee.
A
C
B
A
C
C
It's
held
tonight
of
public
meetings
held
under
the
planning
act.
Personal
information
collected
as
a
result
of
public
meetings
are
collected
under
the
authority
of
the
planning
act
and
will
be
used
to
assist
in
making
a
decision
on
the
matter.
The
person
speaking
at
the
meeting
are
requested
to
give
their
name
and
address
for
recording
in
the
minis.
C
C
Who
is
indeed
elizabeth
fawcett
and
that
I'm
sorry
or
the
assigned
planner
if
they
wish
to
be
notified
regarding
a
particular
application
questions
regarding
the
collection
should
be
forwarded
to
the
director
of
planning
services
public
meeting
reports.
The
first
portion
of
tonight's
meeting
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
public
forum
as
detailed
in
the
public
meeting
reports.
C
These
reports
do
not
contain
us.
Excuse
me
a
staff
recommendation
and
therefore
no
decisions
will
be
made
this
evening
following
the
presentations
by
the
applicant.
The
meeting
will
be
open
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions
comprehensive
reports.
The
second
portion
of
the
tonight's
meeting
is
to
consider
comprehensive
reports.
These
reports
do
contain
a
staff
recommendation
and
the
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
C
After
the
planner's
presentation
committee,
members
will
be
able
to
ask
questions
of
staff
followed
by
members
of
the
public
following
the
question
and
answer
period.
This
committee
then
makes
a
recommendation
on
the
application
to
city
council
who
has
the
final
say
on
the
applications
following
council
decision
notice
will
be
circulated
to
in
accordance
with
planning
act
if
a
person
or
public
body
would
otherwise
have
an
ability
to
appeal.
C
The
decision
of
the
council
of
the
corporation
of
the
city
of
kingston
to
the
ontario
land
tribunal,
but
that
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
all
submissions
at
a
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
to
the
city
of
kingston
before
the
bylaw
is
passed.
That
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
C
C
The
first
public
meeting
is
has
to
do
with
maroony
trucking
limited,
I
believe,
that's
right,
isn't
it
yeah,
and
so,
if
the
proponent
would
like
to
speak
to
this
first,
our
planner,
I'm
sorry
it
is.
I
am
making
mistakes
already.
So
if
my
planner
can
speak
to
this
and
introduce
this
we'll
then
turn
it
over
to
the
proponents.
D
Sure
thank
you
good
evening
acting
chair
members
of
the
committee.
This
is
a
public
meeting
for
1280
mcaduis,
lane
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment.
I
just
will
quickly
confirm
that
notification
was
provided
in
accordance
with
the
planning
act
as
detailed
in
the
public
meeting
report.
To
date,
no
public
correspondence
has
been
received
regarding
this
application.
D
D
Any
questions
posed
this
evening,
as
well
as
any
correspondence
received
moving
forward,
will
be
addressed
in
a
future
report.
Once
the
technical
review
and
assessment
of
the
proposal
has
been
completed,
planning
staff
will
bring
forward
a
comprehensive
report
with
a
recommendation
back
to
committee
at
a
future
date.
Thank
you.
E
You
councillor
neil
and
acting
chair
so
good
evening
to
everyone.
My
name
is
amrijet
sandhu.
I
am
an
aggregate
resources,
planner
with
mhbc
planning
and
we
are
providing
the
planning
and
project
management
services
to
k,
mall,
rooney,
trucking,
limited
or
kmt
in
regards
to
their
proposal
to
open
the
mulrooney
mcadoos
quarry
at
one
two.
F
F
F
You
know
future
for
another
50
years
of
aggregate
source,
and
we
use
all
this
stone
on
our
jobs
in
the
city
and
right
now
we
have
six
jobs
in
the
city
of
kingston.
Not
all
are
for
the
city,
but
private
developers
as
well
and
with
the
mcadoo
quarry
it
will
be
easier
to
get
to
the
different
sites
in
the
city
and
we'd
be
able
to
sell
more
aggregate
to
the
public
and
other
construction
companies
as
well.
E
E
E
E
The
this
source
will
also
provide
good
access
to
locations
along
the
401
corridor
and
to
the
north
into
into
south
frontenac
mcadoos.
Lane
itself,
as
I'm
sure
everyone
is
aware,
is,
is
a
fairly
heavily
industrialized
area
and
it's
predominantly
related
to
auto
salvage
construction
related
businesses
and
is
characterized
by
a
lot
of
trucking
activity.
E
The
closest
residential
uses
to
the
proposed
quarry
site
are
500
or
two
homes
on
italia
lane,
which
is
about
five,
which
are
about
550
meters
to
the
southeast
of
the
proposed
quarry.
There
are
three
homes
at
the
east
end
of
mcdou's
lane,
which
are
about
750
meters
distant,
and
there
are
two
homes
at
the
west
end
of
mcadoos
lane,
which
is
about
which
are
about
950
meters
distant.
E
So,
if
I
can
have
slide
three,
please
thank
you.
A
further
zoomed
in
shot
here
in
the
mapping
showing
the
boundaries
of
the
proposed
quarry
license
and
adjacent
land
uses.
So
on
the
site
itself.
As
you
can
see,
it's
it's
in
a
very
heavily
disturbed
condition
and
and
fairly
those
those
uses
are,
are
industrial
in
nature.
We
have
a
trucking
yard,
we
have
soil
and
concrete
recycling,
we
have
automobile
and
truck
salvage
and
we
have
a
waste
recycling
operation.
E
The
waste
recycling
operation
is
is
on
a
portion
of
mulroney's
property
that
is
leased
to
waste
connections,
canada,
the
lafarge
and
cocoa
quarries
are
labeled
on
the
map
and
they
are
to
the
west
of
the
site.
There
are
construction,
related
businesses
to
the
east
best
best,
crete,
concrete
is
labeled,
but
just
immediately.
East
is
hybrid
construction,
there's
vacant
land
and
trucking
and
construction
businesses
to
the
south.
E
E
So
we're
zooming
now
into
how
the
site
is
configured
in
terms
of
its
proposed
operation
and
these
drawings,
or
this
drawing
specifically,
is
taken
from
the
aggregate
resources
act
site
plan
that
will
govern
the
operation.
Should
it
be
licensed,
so
we
have
a
site
area
of
43
hectares,
but
because
of
setbacks
from
roads
and
the
hydrocorridor,
the
actual
quarry,
the
maximum
quarry
area
would
be
35
hectares
and
the
quarry
would
operate
at
its
maximum
extent
to
a
depth
of
between
33
and
40
for
zero
meters.
E
The
approval
would
also
facilitate
recycling
of
aggregate
based
construction
product
products
and
provide
a
location
for
the
placement
and
beneficial
reuse
of
excess
soil.
So
this
application,
both
under
the
aggregate
resources
act
over
ara
and
through
the
official
plan
and
zoning
amendments
in
those
applications.
All
these
three
uses
are
provided
for
and
are
considered
and
would
form
part
of
the
decision.
E
Phase
two
and
the
maximum
annual
tonnage
that
is
being
proposed
for
this
site
is
six
hundred
thousand
tones,
that's
corresponding
with
the
other
quarries
that
are
operating
in
the
area,
and
that
is
a
requirement
of
the
ara
process
to
identify
what
the
maximum
annual
production
would
be.
Should
the
site
be
licensed,
as
I
mentioned
before,
and
as
band
has
referred
to.
Also,
approval
of
the
quarry
at
this
location
would
meet
key
provincial
and
city
planning
policy
objectives.
It
would
make
high
quality
reserves
available
at
a
close
to
market
location.
E
Obviously,
that
would
be
land
that
would
be
returned
to
grade
and
it
would
not
be
essentially
a
hole
in
the
ground
which
is
has
very
limited
uses
and
all
these
activities,
the
production
of
aggregate,
the
conservation
of
aggregate
and
the
recycling
of
aggregate
and
then
the
deposition
of
excess
soil.
All
these
three
activities
would
occur
in
a
location
that
is
well
suited
and
well
equipped
for
those
purposes
and
has
been
technically
studied
and
designed
for
those
purposes.
E
E
Well,
in
my
submission,
the
same
really
applies
for
material
that
we
need
to
economically
and
efficiently
maintain
and
grow
our
society
and
infrastructure,
especially
when
that
infrastructure
is
under
increasing
pressure
and
in
need
of
upgrading
due
to
the
effects
of
climate
change.
So
having
this
quarry,
this
location
serves
or
fulfills
multiple
planning
policy
objectives
and
is
well
suited
to
the
time
we're
in
today
and
will
be
in
the
will
begin
in
the
near
future.
E
E
It
has
a
very
low
transmissive
transmissivity
for
groundwater,
so
the
lake
that
would
form
would
form
over
time
through
groundwater
accumulation
and
also
surface
water,
mainly
through
precipitation,
and
of
course,
I
think
council
committee
may
be
aware,
through
other
planning
act,
applications
along
macroduce
lane.
This
is
an
area,
that's
kind
of
high
and
dry.
E
E
Thank
you,
so
the
applications
that
are
required
in
order
to
establish
this,
the
proposed
maloney
macros
quarry
are
are
twofold.
First,
we
have
applications
made
under
the
planning
act.
Those
applications
were
submitted
and
deemed
complete
on
april
the
25th,
and
they
constitute
a
city
of
kingston
official
plan
amendment
where
the
existing
designations
would
be
amended
to
mineral
resource
area,
and
the
approval
authority,
of
course,
is
the
city
of
kingston,
and
then
we
also
have
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw.
E
In
that
regard,
of
course,
the
city
now
has
passed
its
city-wide
zoning
by-law,
that
that
was
that
was
passed
subsequent
to
the
filing
of
the
zoning
amendment
for
the
maroonie
quarry.
So
that
has
been
that's
definitely
acknowledged,
and
we
have
had
discussions
with
that
with
the
city
staff
and
that
transition
between
the
two
zoning
bylaws
is
going
to
be
considered
through
the
amendment
process
that
is
currently
underway.
E
To
continue
and
to
be
allowed,
the
core
use
will
only
consume
a
limited
amount
of
the
site
at
any
one
time,
and
there
is
essentially
no
separation
required
between
the
quarry
and
the
pre-existing
uses.
Therefore,
both
the
quarry
use
and
the
pre-existing
uses
can
peacefully
coexist
and
that's
why
we're
looking
for
those
pre-existing
uses
to
be
also
permitted
through
the
special
extractive
zoning
bylaw,
that's
being
requested,
as
we
know.
Obviously,
a
critical
and
statutory
aspect
of
the
planning
act
process
is
the
public
meeting
that
we're
having
here
tonight
and
in
that
process.
E
However,
under
the
aggregate
resources
act,
which
is
the
third
or
I
guess,
second,
set
of
applications-
that's
being
made,
that
process
is
a
bit
more
advanced
than
the
planning
act
process,
so
the
ara
process
was
initiated
on
february.
The
second
that
application
is
for
a
class
a
quarry
license,
it's
a
class
a
because
the
amount
of
tonnage
being
produced
annually
is
more
than
20
000
tons
and
the
approval
authority
for
that
license.
Application
is
the
ministry
of
natural
resources
and
forestry.
E
Now
the
ara
common
period
has
the
ira
public
and
agency
comment
period
has
ended,
and
in
that
process
no
comments
were
received
from
members
of
the
public.
Comments
were
received
from
the
province
through
the
ministry
of
natural
resources
and
forestry
and
through
the
ministry
and
from
the
ministry
of
environmental
conservation
and
parks,
also
from
the
conservation
authority,
which
is
of
course,
in
this
case
this
character,
region
and
from
hydro
one.
E
That
is
a
process
that
may
reach
resolution
within
the
two-year
period
by
which
mal
rooney
must
report
back
to
the
ministry
of
natural
resources
and
forestry
on
the
status
of
the
application.
That's
a
two-year
period
from
february
2nd
of
this
year,
or
it
can
continue
beyond
that
time
period
right
up
to
the
time
of
a
decision
on
the
licensing
which
is
either
made
by
the
ministry
or
the
ontario
land
tribunal.
If
the
ara
application
is
referred
by
the
ministry,
the
minister
of
natural
resources
and
forestry
to
the
olt.
E
White
seven,
thank
you.
The
studies
that
were
submitted
in
respect
of
the
not
only
the
ara
application,
but
also
the
planet
planning
act.
Applications
are
listed
here.
So
I
mentioned
the
second
item
there,
the
site
plan,
so
some
of
the
graphics
that
we've
seen
are
taken
from
the
site
plan.
The
site
plan
basically
describes
existing
conditions,
how
the
site
would
be
operated
and
how
this
type
would
be
progressively
and
finally
rehabilitated
and
of
course,
there
are
technical
reports
that
were
submitted
as
well.
E
So
they
include
an
aggregate
resources,
act
and
planning
act,
planning
report,
a
level
one
and
level
two
hydro
geological
assessment,
a
natural
environment,
technical
report
again
completed
to
the
level
one
and
level
two
standards.
Archaeological
assessments
were
completed.
They
were
completed
only
to
the
stage
one
level,
except
for
a
very
small
area
of
120
square
meters,
which
was
subject
to
a
stage
2
report
only
because
that
was
an
area
of
the
site
that
looked
like
it
had
been
undisturbed
for
a
number
of
years.
E
There
was
also
environmental
noise
and
blast
impact
assessment
reports,
completed
a
traffic
assessment
report
and
a
built
heritage,
resources
and
cultural
heritage.
Landscape
checklist
was
submitted
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
although
there
are
two
sets
of
applications
here,
ongoing
planning
act
and
aggregate
resources
act,
we
have
used
the
same
technical
documentation
for
each
so
that
the
review
agencies
are
looking
at
the
same
documents,
whether
they
are
looking
at
it
under
the
planning
act
or
the
aggregate
resources
act
slide.
Eight.
E
My
data,
thank
you
and
questions
so
dan
and
I
would
be
pleased
to
take
any
questions
that
committee
or
staff
or
or
members
of
the
public
may
have.
We
will
certainly
try
to
answer
them
now
as
best
we
can.
If
there's
anything
we
we
cannot
answer,
then
we
would
be
pleased
to
get
those
questions
in
writing
and
being
responsible.
Thank
you
very.
C
A
Mr
chair,
thank
you
and
through
you
we
do
still.
We
do
have
two
members
of
the
public
with
us
at
this
time,
so
I'll
just
give
them
an
opportunity.
If
there's
anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
to
the
current
application,
to
please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
so
that
we
may
call
on
you
that's
located
in
the
center
of
the
screen
when
you
move
your
mouse
over
the
zoom
window,.
C
G
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
My
question
relates
to
the
neighboring
properties.
I
was
wondering
if
the
applicant
had
reached
out
to
the
kingston
area,
a
kingston
rifle
pistol
club
and
discussed
any
potential
impacts.
This
court
would
have
on
their
their
ability
to
function
and
if,
if
so,
what
was
the
dialogue?
I
I
am
somewhat
concerned.
I
do
know
that
they
have
a
well
on
their
property
and
would
like
to
know
if
there
was
would
be
any
impact
to
their
water,
a
water
source.
If
the
quarry
was
to
go
ahead.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
To
my
knowledge,
there
has
not
been
any
discussion
between
mulrooney
and
the
the
rifle
organization.
There
has
been
discussion
with
some
of
the
more
closer
landowners,
the
ones
who
are
bordering
on
the
property
they're.
The
hydro
geological
report
that
was
done
did
not
identify
any
potential
for
loss
of
water
at
the
location
at
of
the
rifle
club.
E
Now
those
that
process
has
recently
gone
through
a
significant
amount
of
change
in
a
fairly
short
amount
of
time.
Over
the
last
couple
of
years,
the
ministry
of
the
environment,
conservation
and
parks
has
released
new
excess
soils
rules
and
guidelines
and
attendant
with
that.
The
ministry
of
natural
resources
and
forestry
has
recently,
even
maybe,
just
a
couple
of
months
ago,
aligned
and
revised
their
rules
about
importation
of
excess
soil
to
pits
and
quarries
they've
aligned
their
rules
to
match
mecp's
rules.
E
So
now,
hopefully
in
theory,
we
have
a
consistent
and
a
cohesive
framework
that
deals
with
these
things,
and
it
certainly
raises
the
possibility,
where
there's
a
construction
activity
going
on
it
needs
crush
stone.
Aggregates
the
stone
is
delivered
by
the
truck
from
the
quarry
and
at
that
same
construction
site,
you
have
excess
soil
and
when
the
truck
goes
back
to
the
quarry
for
the
next
load,
it's
not
going
empty.
It's
actually
carrying
excess
soil
from
the
construction
project
that
now
can
serve
a
beneficial
reuse
at
the
at
the
quarry
location.
C
C
F
C
C
The
planning
committee
meeting
number
16-2022
I'll
call
the
meeting
to
order.
We
need
a
mover
and
a
seconder
for
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
Councillor
chappelle
councillor
hassan
all
those
in
favor
carried
confirmation
of
minutes
from
our
july
7th
short
meeting
last
week.
Is
there
a
mover
and
a
seconder
for
the
minutes?
C
H
Thank
you
and
through
you
chair,
can
everybody
hear
me?
Okay?
Okay,
great,
so
I
don't
have
a
presentation
today,
just
because
of
the
scope
of
the
report,
but
I
will
just
provide
a
little
bit
of
an
update.
So
the
committee
will
remember,
and
just
as
a
refresher
for
any
members
of
the
public
listening
at
the
committee's
may
5th,
meeting
staff
had
presented
a
recommendation
for
approval
of
a
zoning
by-law
amendment
to
re-zone
the
property
at
1200
princess
street
to
a
site-specific
zone
that
would
permit
a
six-story
and
320
bed
long-term
care
home.
H
A
number
of
residents
of
fairfield
road
attended.
That
meeting
and
submitted
correspondence,
as
well,
mostly
raising
concerns
regarding
the
trafficked
impact
study
associated
with
the
proposal
and
in
response
to
those
comments,
planning
committee
passed
a
motion
to
defer
the
application
to
allow
planning
and
transportation
staff
enough
time
to
consider
some
alternative
access
options
and
to
report
back
to
the
committee
that
motion
directed
staff
to
report
back
by
the
end
of
july
and
that
timeline
was
put
in
place
in
order
to
meet
the
timelines
that
are
required
by
the
communities,
procedural
bylaws.
H
C
I
Hi
everyone,
and
through
you,
acting
vice
chair
or
chair
this
evening,
as
ms
grant
has
pointed
out,
we
are
nearing
the
end
of
this
review,
so
we're
only
requesting
that
the
deferral
to
allow
staff
sufficient
time
to
finalize
the
review
of
alternative
options
take
us
to
september
of
this
year
so
september.
2022.
I
C
A
So,
mr
chair,
there
is
a
supplemental
report
that
was
brought
forward
with
the
recommendation
that
is
effectively
going
to
defer
this
matter,
but
it
does
need
to
go
up
to
council
for
approval
for
that
deferral
to
return
back
to
the
committee,
as
we
are
beyond
the
90
days
that
the
committee
would
be
able
to
do
that
themselves.
So,
as
this
is
an
official
business
item,
there
are
the
two
members
of
the
public
if
they
wish
to
speak
to
it
at
this
time.
A
A
C
C
Okay,
so
and
the
recommendation
there
is
that
staff
be
directed
to
provide
a
supplementary
report
at
a
september,
2022
planning
committee,
meeting,
providing
details
or
other
access
options
for
the
property.
So
is
that
what
councilor
sanik
moved
in
cancer
hutcheson?
Second,
yes,
good!
So
it's
now
on
the
floor,
all
those
in
favor
and
that
carries
unanimously,
which
takes
us
to
the
comprehensive
report
section
b
and
the
recommendation.