►
From YouTube: Kingston, Ontario - Planning Committee - January 21 2021
Description
Planning Committee meeting from January 21, 2021. For full agenda details, visit https://bit.ly/39YsDrc
B
B
The
purpose
of
this
public
meeting
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
public
forum,
as
required
by
the
planning
act
following
presentations
by
the
applicant
committee.
Members
will
be
afforded
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
for
clarification
or
further
information.
The
meeting
will
then
be
open
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions.
B
Interested
persons
are
requested
to
give
their
names
and
addresses
for
recording.
In
the
minutes,
interested
members
of
the
public
can
email.
The
committee
clerk
who
we
have
miss
fawcett
with
us
tonight
just
spoke
or
the
assigned
planner
if
they
wish
to
be
notified.
Regarding
a
particular
application,
no
decisions
are
made
at
public
meetings
concerning
applications.
B
Unless
otherwise
noted
public
meeting
is
held
to
gather
public
opinion.
The
exception
to
this
rule
is
combined
reports
which
consolidates
the
public
meeting
and
comprehensive
reports.
These
applications
are
deemed
by
staff
as
straightforward
and
routine.
This
business
practice
has
been
in
place
for
a
number
of
years
and
is
received
by
the
applicants
as
official
efficient
customer
service
and
effective
use
of
committee
time.
Please
note
that
staff
use
discretion
in
determining
if
an
application
can
be
a
combined
public
meeting
comprehensive
report
to
expedite
the
approval
process.
B
Public
meeting
reports
are
provided
to
inform
the
public
of
all
relevant
information.
Information
gathered
is
then
referred
back
to
planning
services
staff
for
the
preparation
of
a
comprehensive
report
and
recommendation
to
planning
committee.
This
means
that
after
the
meeting
tonight,
staff
will
be
considering
the
comments
made
by
the
public
in
their
further
review
of
the
applications.
B
When
this
review
is
completed,
a
report
will
be
prepared
making
a
recommendation
for
action
to
this
committee.
The
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
The
committee
then
makes
a
recommendation
on
the
applications
to
city
council
city
council
has
the
final
say
on
the
applications.
From
the
city's
perspective.
B
Following
a
council
decision
notice
will
be
circulate,
circulated
in
accordance
with
the
planning
act
if
a
person
or
public
body
would
otherwise
have
an
ability
to
make
the
appeal
of
the
decision
to
the
council
of
the
corporation
of
the
city
of
kingston
to
the
local
appeal
tribunal.
But
the
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
an
oral
submission
at
the
public
meeting
or
make
a
written
submission
to
the
city
of
kingston
before
the
bylaws
passed,
the
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
This.
B
I
see
our
chair
has
arrived
I'll.
Just
continue
quickly,
editorialize
on
what
I
just
read
for
those
members
of
the
public
who
are
here,
it's
essentially
encouraging
you
to
participate
if
you'd
like
to
follow
this
file
going
forward
and
if
you
don't
want
to
participate
tonight,
but
you're
interested
you
can
write
officially
into
the
city
to
have
standing
at
the
el
paso
should
that
ever
be
necessary.
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
Within
the
official
plan,
the
property
is
designated
residential
and
the
residential
designation
covers
off
all
residential
uses
within
the
city,
and
it
provides
the
official
plan
provides
a
series
of
tests
for
verifying
residential
uses
within
that
designation.
So
a
series
of
tests
related
to
compatibility,
so
this
proposal
is,
is
one
that
would
conform
to
the
official
planned
designation
of
residential
next
slide.
Please.
D
D
D
D
The
the
design
of
this
building
and
the
renovations
have
been
prepared
by
rod,
stokes
who's,
a
local
designer
in
kingston,
and
my
my
client
had
had
a
family
member
render
the
site,
which
I,
which
I
know
is
very
helpful
for
the
committee
and
members
of
the
public
to
view
this.
So
we
have
a
series
of
renderings
that
that
I'll
be
able
to
show
you
now
you
can
tell
that
right
now.
This
is
pretty
much
what
the
front
of
the
property
looks
like
today.
If
you've
been
bi.
D
D
This
is
this
is
a
picture
looking
at
the
side
of
the
building
of
the
addition,
and
you
can
see
the
covered
bike
storage
as
well.
So
this
is
a
budding
the
view
that
would
have
butt
the
driveway
on
the
west
side
of
the
property.
This
is
the
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
new
two-story
edition
next
slide,
please.
D
D
D
I'm
going
to
quickly
go
through
some
of
these
floor
plans
because
they
might
be
hard
for
the
public
to
see
right
now.
The
owner
of
the
property
lives
in
the
house
and
when
his
family
first
purchased
it
the
building
had
had
three
units,
but
there's
the
one
unit
was
very
tiny,
so
largely
it's
been
classified
as
a
two
unit
building.
So
what
you're
seeing
is
the
main
floor
of
the
existing
house
with
the
wooden
deck,
and
you
can
see
that
there's
a
there
was
an
existing
bachelor
pad
at
the
back
of
the
first
floor.
D
D
D
D
D
There
is
a
request
to
reduce
the
minimum
front
yard,
and
that
is
that's
because
of
the
existing,
so
the
a5
zone
requires
a
seven
and
a
half
meter
setback,
but
the
existing
house
is
already
four
and
a
half
meters.
So
that's
a
that's
a
recognition
of.
What's
there
we're
seeking
to
reduce
the
minimum
side
yard,
that
is
again
the
recognition
of
the
existing
house,
which
comes
within
0.9
meters
on
the
east
side
of
the
property,
the
requirement
is
1.2
meters.
D
D
So
we
would
need
to
increase
that
to
accommodate
four
cars
rather
than
two,
and
we
would
also
need
to
permit
the
single
lane
entrance
the
note
about
aggregate
amenity.
I
want
to
speak
to
briefly.
This
is
to
do
with
the
fact
that
when
you
have
shared
amenity
spaces,
they
are
required
to
be
greater
than
54
square
meters.
D
This
property
overall
is
providing
more
than
100
square
meters
of
amenity
space,
but
the
shared
deck
is
less
than
54
square
meters.
So
there's
aspects
of
amenity
that
we
need
to
reduce,
but
it's
not
overall
overall
there's
a
front
yard,
a
backyard,
a
deck,
a
patio
there's
all
kinds
of
wonderful
amenities
being
proposed
next
slide.
Please.
D
So
this
is
my
my
summary
slide
and
I
do
have
a
few
slides
following
the
presentation
that
maybe
assists
of
assistance
during
questions.
So
I
would
just
like
to
summarize
that
that,
as
a
land
use
planner,
I
find
that
this
project
is
consistent
with
provincial
policy
that
it
forms
to
the
official
plan
tests.
D
It's
been
designed
very
carefully
to
respect
the
neighborhood
and
the
character
by
tucking
everything
behind
that
existing
dwelling,
and
it's
proposed
to
maintain
that
current
streetscape
that's
a
very
important
test
when
we're
dealing
with
stable
neighborhoods
and
it's
in
good
proximity
to
a
variety
of
of
city
uses
such
as
transit
parks
and
trails
and-
and
I
believe
it's
a
good
intensification
project
for
this
location.
I'm
pleased
to
assist
with
any
questions.
Thank.
D
E
Hi
good
evening,
mr
chair
and
sirium,
I
would
like
to
mention
that
notification
for
this
public
meeting
was
completed
in
accordance
to
the
requirements
of
the
planning
act.
We
received
several
comments
and
they
were
attached
as
addendum
to
this
meeting
the
comments
that
were
attached
as
well
as
any
future
comments
will
be
addressed
in
the
future
comprehensive
report
for
which
we
don't
have
a
date.
Yet.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
C
F
F
I
just
wondered
if
there
is
room
on
the
front
yard
when
this
is
done
to
plant
a
tree
or
if
that
tree
is
still
there,
if,
if
it
could
just
be
trimmed
up
and
still
be
incorporated
and
the
backyard,
because
you're
putting
on
that,
that
big
addition
on
the
backyard
are
there
trees
in
the
backyard
or
what's
the
plan
for
trees
when
when
the
addition
has
been
done?
Thank
you.
F
D
D
That's
proposed
it's
a
manitoba
maple
that
is
in
poor
condition
and
there's
also
a
cedar
hedge,
at
the
back,
where
the
parkings
propose
that's
in
also
in
poor
condition,
but
the
rest
of
the
trees
that
are
all
largely
on
the
property
line
are
all
being
maintained
and
there
are
additional
plantings
proposed
as
well.
So
the
I
don't
think,
there's
a
bush
on
the
front
lawn
anymore,
their
their
lawn
areas
that
we
do
hope
to
use
as
some
of
the
amenity
for
the
the
user
for
the
future
residents
of
this
building,
though,.
D
D
D
The
tree
that
is
being
removed
is
on
the
top
side
of
this
image,
and
it's
it's
there's.
Basically,
a
circle
close
to
the
addition.
At
the
back.
There
would
have
been
four
circles
there.
One
of
those
is
going
away
where
the
manitoba
maple
is
in
poor
condition,
but
you
can
see
that
also
on
this
on
the
side
of
the
property,
the
north
side
of
this
picture.
The
top
of
this
picture
is
the
east
side
of
the
property,
and
that's
that's
basically,
an
area
that
would
just
be
green
space.
D
It's
not
really
being
counted
as
amenity
space.
It's
a
bioswale
and
it'll
have
plantings
to
deal
with
any
any
storm
water
requirements
for
the
site,
so
the
site
is
really
oriented
toward
the
driveway.
In
terms
of
both
the
hard
surfaces
and
the
plantings,
you
can
see
the
back
patio
has
plantings,
and
all
of
that
would
just
help
with
any
cars
coming
and
going
from
the
site
in
terms
of
light
reflecting
you
know,
both
in
and
around
on
on
the
properties
as
well.
I
hope
that
assists.
F
D
Well,
you
know
through
you,
mr
chair,
I
I
I
would
say
just
like
as
a
non-arborist,
it
certainly
looks
like
there's
enough
room,
there's,
there's
lots
of
pipes
and
other
things
going
on.
So
what
I'll?
What
I'll
do?
Counselor
osanac
is
I'll
commit
to
speaking
to
my
client
and
our
technical
team
and
ask
if
tree
could
be
added
to
the
front
of
this
property
because
we're
we're
still
early
stages
and
and
those
are
large
front
lawns
they're
about
four
and
a
half
meters
deep.
C
A
C
C
B
I
have
a
grade
12
this
octmester
grade
12
world
history.
Then
next
octmester,
I'm
doing
prep
coverage.
So
when
teachers
take
their
prep,
I
just
go
around
and
help
cover
them.
And
then,
after
that
I
have
a
grade,
9
geography
and
then
I
have
to
find
out
what
I
get
for
octo8.
So
hopefully
I
get
a
position.
Then
too
yeah.
A
C
G
C
A
C
B
Really
quickly
just
a
comment.
I
think
this
is
a
great
example
of
infill,
nice
and
scaled
to
the
neighborhood,
adding
new
units
using
land-
that's
already
there.
So
I'm
happy
to
put
my
support
upon
it
unless
there's
something
that
comes
up
in
comprehensive
report,
that's
not
great,
but
it
looks
good
to
me.
H
D
D
Bars
yeah
through
you,
mr
chair,
absolutely,
and
you
know
one
of
the
things
I
I
meant
to
mention
earlier
as
well.
Is
this:
this
site
doesn't
have
a
basement
under
it.
So
that's
a
big
reason
why
our
bike
storage
is
under
a
shed,
basically
protected
bike
cover
we're
showing
the
roof
right
now.
Maybe
we
could
go
a
full
shed
instead,
there's
room
for
us
to
add
those
extra
details.
D
H
D
You
know
like,
for
example,
a
side
yard.
Setback
of
1.2
meters
has
been
doubled
to
2.4,
almost
so
doubling
of
setbacks.
It's
a
two-story
build,
so
you
don't
have
you
don't
have
overlook?
There's!
No,
you
know
there's
not
even
the
extra
half
a
story,
so
the
challenge
is.
Is
that
that
you
face
each
and
every
one
of
these
applications?
Is
that
you're
dealing
with
a
zoning
bylaw
and
amendments
of
that
bylaw
from
a
bylaw
that
that's
older
than
I
am?
D
And
you
know
I'm
I'm
not
as
young
as
I
used
to
be
so
so
you're
dealing
with
an
official
plan
that
does
recognize
even
in
stable
neighborhoods.
The
city
wants
to
see
appropriate
intensification
and,
in
this
case,
coming
up
with
with
very
attractive
units
that
are
attractive
to
a
variety
of
tenants.
They
have
nice,
open,
dining
kitchen
living
areas,
they're
two
bedroom
units
other
than
the
main
one,
which
is
three
they're
designed
in
a
way
that
should
provide
a
number
of
people,
some
rental
options
to
consider
this.
H
C
C
So
if
there's
any
way
that
you
can
redesign
repurpose
that
shed
so
that
it's
a
fully
secured
bike
shed,
I
think
that
would
be
really
really
good
and
the
only
other
thing
is
like
counselor
sanic
she's,
our
prime
tree
hugger
on
this
committee,
but
she's
not
the
only
tree
hugger,
and
it
would
be
really
really
nice.
I
think,
on
the
streetscape.
C
If
there
was
a
red
maple
on
that
front
lawn,
it
would
really
really
spruce
up
the
streetscape.
I
think
so.
A
consideration
of
that
would
be
really
really
good
and
I
agree
with
councillor
kylie.
That's
it's
a
good
design
for
a
very
substantially
sized
lot.
It's
actually
an
oversized
lot
for
one
or
two
unit
house,
so
so
it
has
potential
for
redevelopment.
D
C
D
D
C
A
G
A
G
C
I
I
C
I
G
C
G
D
So
it's
not
a
case
that
that
you
can
just
everyone
could
just
build.
These
are
individual
cases
assessed,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
assure
you
that,
in
coming
up
with
the
designs,
we
have
considered
your
property
and
if
there
are
design
elements
that
that
you'd
like
to
see
involved,
we'd
certainly
be
happy
to
get
those
in
writing
through
the
clerk
or
the
planning
department.
And
those
are
things
we
could
take
into
consideration.
D
As
this
advances
forward
with
staff
and
committee
and
other
questions
right
now,
we've
just
received
technical
comments
from
city
staff
and
the
way
these
projects
go.
There's
always
a
couple
of
changes,
so
we'd
be
pleased
to
take
your
input,
but
do
know
that
that
we
absolutely
consider
your
property
and
the
orientation
of
the
home
and
your
driveway
in
coming
up
with
the
design
that
we
have.
Thank
you.
C
J
I
live
at
3
gardner
street,
but
I
own
the
house
across
the
street
from
the
reference
property
I
own
586
union
street,
and
our
concern
is
that
I
did
send
an
email
when
we
when
we
purchased
586
union
street.
We
did
so
with
the
plan
on
improving
the
home
and
and
retiring
there
and
for
gardner
street
came
on
the
market
and
we
loved
the
property.
So
we
purchased
it
and
what
we
kept
hearing
from
people
with
586
union
was
do
an
addition.
J
They're
going
to
sell
to
somebody
who's
going
to
do
an
addition
and
then
there's
this
whole
tumble
effect,
and
I
understand
we
need
housing
for
students
and
for
the
general
population
and
we
need
intensification.
But
if
you
drive
down
union
and
make
a
left
on
gardner
street,
there
is
lots
of
intensification.
J
C
K
K
This
is
the
first
time
I've
ever
done
this.
Can
you
guys
see
me
no
all
right?
Well,
I
did
send
a
letter.
Did
anybody
see
it
or
read
it
awesome?
This
is
not
about
not
wanting
people
to
have
a
home
to
live
in.
If
you
see
this
property,
I
mean
all
of
the
lots,
there's
three
of
them
side
by
each
you're,
going
to
see
exactly
the
same
two-story
buildings
there
within
a
couple
years.
K
These
are
money-generating
properties
and
the
lots
are
huge.
They're
unique,
portsmouth
village
is
unique.
The
reason
I'm
concerned
is
because
I
live
here.
I
don't
live
out
on
sydney
road.
I
live
here,
live
right
down
where
these
properties
are
being
developed,
gardner
street,
just
at
the
end
of
our
street,
at
kennedy
and
gardner,
a
property,
it's
basically
a
two-story
apartment,
building,
they're
adding
more
to
it
right
now
it
was
approved.
K
K
So
my
concern
is,
the
neighborhood
is
changing,
it
really
is,
and
it's
like,
I
know
that
you
you're
not
going
to
dictate,
who
rents
a
property.
These
are
queens
and
same
old
students
that
are
going
to
be
living
here,
and
I
have
I
mean
they
have
to
be
somewhere
right,
but
it's
like
this
is.
If
you
come
down
to
this
neighborhood
and
see
what's
happening,
it
sounds
like
this
project
already
a
done
deal
is
it
is
this
project
a
done
deal.
C
No,
this
is
the
first
of
a
process,
our
staff
take
back
the
public
comments
and
in
likely
a
couple
of
months
a
comprehensive
report
comes
with
a
recommendation.
The
recommendation
may
be
to
approve
it
may
be
to
change
or
approve
with
conditions
or
it
may
be
to
turn
it
down,
but
this
is
merely
the
public
meeting
at
the
beginning
of
that
process.
K
Well,
you're,
going
to
see
this
type
of
project
take
place
twice
more
right.
Beside
the
one,
that's
being
proposed,
there'll
be
two
more
because
these
are
these
are
going
to
be
extremely
profitable
and
you
have
somebody
may
live
there.
Now
I
guarantee
you,
they
won't
for
long
they'll
be
living
out
somewhere
in
the
country,
and
these
will
be
rental
properties.
K
A
D
C
Thank
you
I'll
give
one
more
really
quick
question
to
committee,
because
we've
heard
some
other
things.
Is
there
any
comment
or
question
that
the
committee
would
like
to
make
seeing
none
I'll
declare
this
public
meeting
completed
and
all
of
those
that
have
sent
letters
or
spoken
tonight
will
be
given
a
notification
from
the
city
for
when
the
comprehensive
report
with
recommendations
are
coming
forward.
B
C
B
A
B
C
C
Those
wishing
to
provide
oral
comments
at
this
meeting
will
be
invited
to
do
so
if
a
person
or
public
body
would
otherwise
have
an
ability
to
appeal.
The
decision
of
the
council
of
the
corporation
of
the
city
of
kingston
to
the
local
planning
appeal
tribunal,
but
that
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
oral
submissions
at
a
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
to
the
city
of
kingston
before
the
bylaw
is
passed.
That
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal
the
decision.
E
Thank
you.
This
is
a
comprehensive
report
that
they
will
be
presenting
on
it's
regarding
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
for
zoning,
bylaw,
h499
and
the
subject
side
is
located
at
192
union
state.
One
thing
to
mention
here
before
the
start
of
the
presentation
is
that
the
application
went
to
a
public
meeting
back
in
november
of
2020
next
slide.
Please,
the
goal
of
this
application
is
to
allow
for
creating
for
self-contained
residential
units,
one
as
we
speak.
E
E
So
the
subject
site
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
union
state,
it's
very
close
from
the
main
campus
of
queens
university,
and
it
has
a
rectangular
shape.
An
advantage
of
about
nine
meters
on
union
state
vehicular
access
to
the
site
is
from
the
back
lane,
which
is
shown
here
on
the
slide.
One
thing
to
add
is
that
the
back
lane
is
owned
and
maintained
by
queen's
university
next
slide.
E
E
Also,
there
will
be
amenity
spaces,
some
on
the
back
and
some
of
the
fun.
Additionally,
as
part
of
the
proposal,
two
sidewalks
one
on
each
side
of
the
building
are
proposed,
and
I
hope
you
can
see
it.
The
sidewalks
are
gonna
be
within
the
side
yards,
so
the
sidewalks
are
gonna,
be
within
the
side
yards
next
slide.
Please.
E
The
perspective
design
shows
that
they
will.
The
proposal
will
kind
of
animate
the
existing
buildings
by
adding
more
visual
appeal.
For
example,
juliet
balconies
are
proposed
and
also
a
contest
and
colors
are
going
to
be
utilized
to
make
the
building
more
vibrant
and
more
visually
interesting
next
slide.
Please.
E
So
the
existing
zone,
which
is
an
e
special
education
and
medical
usage
zone,
does
not
allow
as
a
proposal,
and
for
that
reason
there
was
an
application
for
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
the
the
target
zone
is
a
site-specific
b600
zone
which
includes
eight
standards
which
are
shown
here
on
the
slide,
and
I'm
going
to
pause
here
for
about
30
seconds.
So
you
can
add
for
yourselves
what
the
new,
which
provisions
of
the
zoning
bylaw
are
being.
E
E
So
we
received
comments
regarding
the
proposal.
These
comments
are
shown
on
the
slide
here
in
response
to
these
comments:
wood
spindles
in
the
back
deck
where
were
placed
by
black
metal
ones,
or
additionally,
we
received
comments
confirming
the
ownership
of
the
back
lane
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
it's
owned
by
queen's
university.
E
K
E
C
H
H
H
M
I'm
not
even
sure
if
I'm
allowed
to
ask
this
question
so
I'll
put
this
in
the
hands
of
the
chair,
but
we
did
get
a
letter
indicating
that
several
years
ago
a
similar
request
for
zoning
change
was
made
and
turned
down.
I'm
just
wondering
what
what
the
difference
is
between
that
and
this.
If
anyone
knows
that.
E
So
you,
mr
so,
and
I
can-
I
can
provide
some
context
about
the
difference,
but
also
the
applicant
can
jump
in
and
add
more
if
he
likes.
So
from
my
understanding
when
I
looked
at
the
previous
application,
the
biggest
difference
for
me
was
about
the
lack
of
more
visual
interest
to
the
building
compared
to
the
one
we
have
at
hand.
Now,
the
one
we
have
now
has
included
more
visual
articulation,
such
as
juliet
balconies
to
the
application,
which
was
not
the
case
in
the
previous
one.
E
L
You
thank
you
through
you,
mr
chair.
Yes,
so
about
10
years
ago,
there
was
an
application
shortly
after
the
I
believe,
after
the
current
owner
bought
it,
and
at
the
time
it
was
thought
that
a
rezoning
would
be
a
minor
undertaking
and
they
were
just
going
to
have
a
total
two
units
in
the
in
the
building.
But
then
they
decided
to
just
withdraw
because
there's
a
bigger
undertaking
than
they
anticipated
at
the
time,
so
they
went
through
and
now
I've
decided
to
reapply
and
go
and
apply
for
four
units.
L
C
C
A
C
C
C
C
B
B
C
C
C
H
Okay,
I'm
just
waiting
to
have
a
meeting.
My
question
is
to
staff.
Is
we
saw
that
there
wasn't
going
to
be
notification
within
the
one
planning
matters?
I
just
wondered
what
the
rationale
for
that
was.
I
had
my
follow-up
email
to
counselor
carly.
I
said
that
so
I'm
just
wondering
what
the
what
the
reasoning
was,
and
so
we
can
better
understand
where
it
came
from.
N
N
H
Are
these
notifications
on
council
for
who
knows
how
long
and
it
just
occurred
to
me
when
this
happened?
I
don't
know
who
delivers
these
things.
So
if
you
can
answer
that
and
if
it's
canada
post,
why
can't
we
do
that?
But
obviously
the
production
and
the
distribution
are
connected.
So
if
you
could
explain
that
technical
piece,
please.
N
All
of
those
have
to
be
folded
and
stuffed
into
envelopes
and
also
addressed
with
envelopes,
and
then
the
once.
Basically
that
takes
place
the
postage
gets
assigned,
and
then
it
goes
out
in
the
mail
for
distribution
by
canada.
Post
is
the
process
that
we
follow
internally,
so
that
process
will
continue
it's
being
done
by
other
staff
that
are
are
in
the
office
working
because
they
cannot
work
from
home.
So
that
is,
that
is
how
that
is
being
handled.
In
the
meantime.
Will
my
staff
continue
to
be
at
home
during
the
stay-at-home
order.
H
Right,
okay,
I
had
a
follow-up.
Just
let
me
think
for
a
second,
the
okay.
So
there's
there's
no
problem.
It
came
up
in
emails.
So
what
I
do
for
what
you
said
is
that
there's
no
problem
with
the
canada
post
issue
of
delivering
them
is
not
an
issue.
It's
all
got
to
do
with
the
production
in
and
distribution
as
it
relates
to
the
stay-at-home
worker.
C
B
Yeah,
mr
chair,
through
you,
thank
you,
miss
agnew.
I
think
I
had
my
information
wrong
when
corresponding
with
other
counselors
and
residents
of
this.
I
think
you
actually
have
corrected
me,
maybe
unintentionally
tonight,
which
is
the
distribution
of
the
120
meters
radius.
Is
that
an
additional
city
of
kingston
practice
above
and
beyond,
what's
required
by
the
planning
act,
because
I
was
under
the
impression
that
was
something
that
was
a
provincial
mandate.
So
maybe
you
could
clarify
that
for
me.
N
Sure
the
the
provincial
legislation
it
gives
a
couple
of
different
ways
that
notice
can
be
met
under
the
planning
act
with
respect
to
the
official
like
giving
notice,
as
it's
called
so
there's
there,
you
can
use
large
newspaper
ads
distribution
or
you
can
look
at
doing
individual
household
notices
with
signage
on
the
property.
So
the
other
consideration
to
this
as
well
is
that,
typically
again
in
in
light
of
the
stay-at-home
order,
when
we
do
individual
notices,
there's
also
signage,
that
has
to
be
posted
on
the
property.
B
M
M
C
C
C
C
C
H
I
I
was
trying
to
get
out
of
the
way
of
the
other
counselors
before
so
I
didn't
finish
so.
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
the
commissioner
for
her
trying
to
protect
her
staff.
I
think
we
all
really
appreciate
that
and
understand
her
her
motivation
and
it's
impossible
to
complain
about
that.
For
sure
this
is.
This
is
a
bit
difficult,
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
I
appreciate
with
the
how
the
public
responded
as
well,
be,
however,
inadvertent
or
misread.
H
This
is
a
serious
problem.
That's
been
going
on
for
the
whole
time.
I've
gotten
counsel
and
we
haven't
got
a
solution
yet
so
I
understand
why
people
became
adamant
as
counselor
neil
said
very
well,
it's
a
matter
of
expectation.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
note.
So
we're
aware
why
we
got
the
response
we
did
and
but
again
thank
you
to
the
commissioner.
I
think
she
was
doing
her
very
best
to
to
protect
her
staff
and
that's
that's.
Can
we
only
be
good.
C
A
C
C
One
letter
which
is
part
of
our
correspondence
and
any
comments
on
it,
seeing
none
we'll
go
to
the
date
and
time
of
our
next
meeting,
which
is
thursday
february
4th
at
6
pm,
and
I
understand
it
may
be
another
somewhat
light
agenda
hope
springs
eternal.
I
know
I
appreciate
that,
so
we
will
call
for
an
adjournment.