►
From YouTube: Kingston, Ontario - Planning Committee - May 19, 2022
Description
Planning Committee meeting from May 19, 2022. For full agenda details visit https://bit.ly/3luM6Gw
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
through
you
welcome
everyone
to
this
evening's
planning
committee
meeting.
I
can
confirm
that
we
do
have
quorum
currently
absent
our
counselor
chapelle
and
councillor
hutchison
joining
us
from
staff
for
tim
park,
director
of
planning
services,
james
barr
manager
of
development
approvals
in
clan
denning
senior
planner,
I'm
elizabeth
fawcett,
I'm
the
committee
clerk
for
this
committee
and
we
also
have
blair
johnson
joining
us
as
meeting
host.
B
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
and
for
members
of
the
public,
as
I
know,
staff
and
the
other
professionals
on
the
call
are
aware,
but
for
members
of
the
public
tonight
we
only
have
one
agenda
item
as
you'll
see
and
it's
for
woodhaven
not
for
the
tannery.
I
know
that
there
were
there
were
plans
to
have
the
tannery
tonight,
but
just
wanted
to
make
clear
if
you're
here,
for
that
that
will
be
later
down
the
road,
but
not
tonight.
A
A
Are
there
any
disclosures
of
pecuniary
interest,
seeing
none?
There
are
no
delegations
or
briefings,
so
we
can
get
right
to
our
first
and
only
business
item,
which
is
a
comprehensive
report
and
that's
for
1201
1214
and
1301
woodhaven
drive,
and
with
that
we
can
look
to
our
staff
to
give
us
an
overview.
C
Thank
you
and
through
the
chair,
this
is
a
comprehensive
report
and
recommendation
related
to
an
application
for
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
the
property
known
as
1201
1214
and
1301
woodhaven
drive
respecting
application.
D14013
2020,
a
public
meeting
was
held
with
respect
to
this
application
on
february
3rd
2022.
C
The
amendments,
broadly
speaking,
would
create
a
broader
array
of
dwelling
types
decrease,
the
minimum
front,
rear
and
side
yard
setbacks,
reduce
sight
triangles
and
would
add
a
new
type
of
dwelling
defined
as
a
link.
Dwelling
house,
with
specific
definition,
emphasis
that
the
fact
that
the
holding
provision
would
remain
in
place
on
the
subject
property
until
services
associated
with
the
development
are
in
place.
We
could
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please.
C
As
you
can
see,
the
site
is
located
north
of
kataraki
woods
drive
and
generally
flanks.
The
collins,
creek
wetland
complex
to
the
west.
Further
east
is
bay
ridge
drive
the
subject.
Lands
are
broken
up
into
three
areas,
as
illustrated
reflecting
the
hydrocorridor
and
the
trans-northern
pipeline,
which
separates
the
area
to
the
north
and
middle
of
the
property
respect
respectively.
C
Under
the
official
plan,
the
areas
that
are
subject
to
the
zoning
amendment
are
variously
zoned,
medium
and
low
density,
residential
with
a
small
section
zone
media,
a
designated
medium
density
at
the
far
north
of
the
property.
We
could
go
to
the
next
slide
as
referenced
at
the
onset
of
this
presentation.
C
The
zoning
bylaw
under
7626
has
a
variety
about
a
zoning,
a
site,
specific
zoning
applied
to
the
property
ranging
from
r2-32
33,
38,
39
40,
all
under
76
26,
with
slight
modifications,
respecting
setbacks
from
the
pipeline
corridor.
The
wetland
complex
and
various
other
site-specific
exceptions
unique
to
each
area.
If
we
could
go
to
the
next
property,
I'm
sorry
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide
recently
approved
bylaw
2022
62,
the
city
of
kingston.
C
Zoning
bylaw
has
consolidated
a
lot
of
these
separate
zones,
but
we
still
have
three
exception
legacy
exceptions
generally,
reflecting
the
wording
that
was
used
in
the
previous
zoning
bylaw.
All
lands
are
now
subject
to
the
ur3b
zone
and
holding
does
remain
in
place.
The
effect
of
the
current
application
would
re
remain
with
the
holding
provision.
C
If
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
I've
highlighted
here
some
of
the
key
features
of
the
proposed
amendment,
highlighting
that
the
applicant's
comparison
zone,
which
does
not
currently
apply
to
the
property
but
is
located
in
the
area,
is
the
residential
type
2
exception.
50
zone.
You
see
here
that
only
minor
deviations
are
proposed
from
what
are
corner
lots
for
the
regular
knot,
a
budding
two
streets,
one
on
a
flanking
side
and
one
on
the
frontage.
C
C
We
could
go
to
the
next
slide
once
again
in
respect
to
front
yard
and
exterior
side
yard,
it's
taking
the
setbacks
from
the
r2-50
comparison
zone,
which
it
would
mirror
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please,
as
referenced
earlier,
the
proposed
site-specific
zone
applies
to
all
of
the
subdivi
subject:
plans
to
address
the
site-specific
zones,
which
uniquely
address
the
northern
trans-northern
pipeline
and
the
environmental
protection
area
to
the
west.
C
The
provisions
do
afford
the
the
same
setbacks
that
are
currently
considered
under
the
site.
Specific
bylaws,
though,
essentially
it
just
changes.
The
place
of
them
from
the
the
standard
definition
of
a
rear
lot,
setback
to
specific
setbacks,
unique
to
variously
the
environmental
protection
area
and
the
trans-northern
pipeline.
C
Here
you
see
the
definition
of
a
link
dwelling
house
as
one
of
two
or
more
single-family
dwelling
houses
linked
by
a
common
underground
masonry
footing,
each
of
which
has
an
independent
entrance
directly
from
the
outside,
but
does
not
include
any
other
dwelling
house
hearing
defined.
We
could
go
to
the
next
slide
as
referenced
earlier.
The
bylaw
2022-62
does
act
to
consolidate
a
lot
of
the
various
previous
zoning
into
one
ur-3b
zone.
There
are
still
a
couple
of
exception:
legacy
exception
zones.
C
C
C
You'll
note
here
that
specific
provisions
for
amendments
to
bylaw,
2022
62
do
not
make
reference
to
the
pipeline
separation,
which
is
uniquely
set
out
in
section
424
of
the
recently
approved
city-wide
bylaw.
We
could
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
highlighting
in
red
here
is
the
area
in
which
the
zoning
bylaw
amendments
apply
to
this.
On
the
left
hand,
side
is
the
entirety
of
the
draft
plan
of
subdivision
which
is
currently
approved,
so
it
relates
to
the
northern
half
of
that
area.
C
If
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
within
the
middle
section,
is
an
application
for
woodhaven
phase
2
stage
2,
which
intends
to
utilize
the
provisions
of
the
proposed
zoning
amendment
in
their
development
along
buckthorn
drive
the
next
slide.
If
we
could
go
to
that,
please
next
slide
shows
how
the
development
incorporates
slightly
well
reduced
frontages
for
the
7626
bylaw
as
of
right
frontages
for
the
ur-3b
zoning.
C
So
it
is
staff's
recommendation
based
on
the
fact
that
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
provincial
policy
statement,
conforms
to
the
city
of
kingston
official
plan
and
represents
good
land
use
planning
staff
are
recommending
approval
of
this
application
for
zoning
amendment
for
this
property
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please,
and
with
that,
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
A
D
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
through
you
a
question
from
the
report
that
I
never
realized
when
we
had
the
public
meeting
a
few
months
ago
on,
let's
see
it's
page
5
of
11,
where
it
says,
while
the
proposed
bylaws
set
out
in
the
application
has
indicated
that
in
quotations,
public
use
would
not
be
permitted.
Correspondence
with
the
applicant
has
resulted
in
an
amendment
to
the
proposal
which
would
permit
such,
and
I
don't
understand
what
that
means.
Where's.
C
Sorry,
that's
just
clarifying
in
one
situation:
they
they
were
not
proposing.
As
of
right
permissions
for
a
public
use
in
most
any
other
zone,
a
public
use
is
allowed
basically
throughout
any
zones,
but
by
not
including
that
it
threatens
either
to
confuse
the
issue
whether
a
public
use
which
broadly
defined
includes
really
any
public
amenity
area.
Any.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
and
through
your
chair,
just
to
build
off
what
ian
was
saying:
bylaws
in
general,
allow
for
public
uses
across
all
zones
in
the
city
in
order
to
give
government
agencies
maximum
flexibility
on
where
they
can
operate,
what
this
means
and
what
public
use
is
defined
as
it's
any
building
or
structure
or
lot
used
for
public
services
provided
by
the
county,
the
municipality,
the
corporation
of
the
county.
Sorry,
that's
a
redundant
term
in
here
the
conservation
authority,
the
government
of
ontario,
the
ministry
or
government
of
ontario
or
canada.
E
D
C
E
D
Yeah
that
that's
my
concern,
so
they
have
like
12
meters
and
then
it's
the
open
space
and
then
it's
the
epa
so
yeah,
I
think
fencing
when
we
were
doing
the
secondary
plan
for
cat
west.
Fencing
was
pretty
important
just
so
that,
like
you,
said,
people
can't
encroach
start
taking
down
the
trees
beyond
those
12
meters
that
are
actually
in
the
open
space
and
start
building
things
in
there,
as
if
it's
their
own
property
and
it's
20
years
later,
and
no
one
even
knows
where
the
property
line
ends.
E
C
C
You
see
that
bordering
on
the
south
of
buckthorn
drive
at
the
north
along
trans
northern
pipeline
easement,
there's
a
variety
of
three
and
four
unit
row
buildings.
Now,
on
the
south
side,
it
would
facilitate
parking
where
there
is
essentially
tight,
spacing
between
lots.
I
did
take
the
liberty
of
doing
some
measurements
and
for
those
with
keen
eyes
or
keem
glasses,
you'd,
see
that,
after
about
two
groupings
of
the
three
unit
row
buildings,
there's
a
measurement,
that's
about
eight
and
a
half
meters.
C
A
C
So
I
I
mean
I
might
take
an
opportunity
to
highlight
some
of
the
amenity
areas
within
this
woodhaven
subdivision
with
respect
to
open
spaces
access
to
public
amenity
areas.
But
yes,
this
is
a
approved
plan
of
subdivision
the
current
zoning
by
way
of
allowing
an
additional
dwelling
type
by
allowing
reduced
lot.
Frontage
requirements
allows
for
minor
opportunities
for
intensification,
while
still
adhering
to
the
initial
draft
plan
approved
plan
of
subdivision.
C
So
as
referenced
earlier,
we
are
talking
about
fencing
and
setbacks
from
the
the
wetland
further
west,
and
that
is
an
amenity
area,
as
well
as
the
transnorthern
pipeline
easement,
where
that's
planned
for
open
space
in
accordance
with
the
kataraki
west
secondary
plan.
So
there
is
numero
numerous
opportunities
for
green
space
in
this
area,
while
the
current
application
is
simply
addressing
the
residential
designation
and
the
uses
they're
in
fair.
A
Enough
and
finally,
you
did
address
it
in
your
presentation
where
you
had
the
four
different
columns
of
the
zoning.
You
circled
some
and
showed
lines
over
to
the
new
proposed
zoning,
just
to
be
clear
with
that,
where
there
are
dwelling
types
that
are
not
contemplated
in
what
we
may
approve
tonight,
if
you
compare
it
to
the
previous
zoning,
do
those
ones
that
don't
carry
over
just
get
dropped
off
or
what
happens
with
them?.
C
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
through
you,
we
do
still
have
two
members
of
the
public
here,
so
if
they
would
like
to
speak
to
the
current
application,
if
you
can,
please
raise
your
hand
and
zoom
so
that
we
may
call
on
you
it's
found
in
the
center
of
the
zoom
window.
When
you
move
your
mouse
over
the
screen.
A
And
while
we
wait
for
that,
I
just
quickly
interject
that,
if
you
do
wish
to
participate,
we'll
require
your
name
and
address
and
you'll
have
five
minutes
to
speak
all
together.
One
person
followed
by
the
other
and
then
the
planning
staff
will
respond
as
appropriate
after
both
people
have
spoken.
If
you
wish
to
do
so,.
B
A
A
A
If
there
are
no
motions
which
there
are
not,
are
there
any
notices
of
motions,
seeing
none,
no
other
business
correspondence,
so
that
brings
us
to
the
next
meeting,
which
is
a
week
away
from
today,
thursday
may
26th
at
6
pm
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn.
Please
answer:
neil
counselor
sanic,
all
those
in
favor
27
minutes
is
a
new
record
thanks
very
much
everyone
and
to
staff
as
well.
Thank
you
have
a
good
night.