►
From YouTube: Kingston Ontario - Planning Meeting - December 14, 2017
Description
Planning Committee meeting from December 14, 2017. For the full meeting agenda visit https://goo.gl/Ut3d6T
A
Sorry
and
personal
information
collected
as
a
result
of
this
public
meeting
hearing
and
on
the
forms
provided
at
the
back
of
the
room,
is
collected
under
the
authority
of
the
Planning
Act
and
will
be
used
to
assist
in
making
a
decision
on
this
matter.
All
names
addresses
opinions
and
comments
may
be
collected
and
may
form
part
of
the
minutes
which
will
be
available
to
the
public
questions
regarding
the
collection
should
be
forwarded
to
the
Director
of
Planning
building
and
licensing
services.
A
The
purposes
of
public
meetings
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
public
forum,
as
required
by
the
Planning
Act
following
presentations
of
the
applicant
committee,
members
will
be
afforded
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
for
clarification
or
further
information.
The
meeting
will
then
be
opened
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions.
A
Interested
persons
are
requested
to
give
their
name
and
address
for
recording
in
the
minutes.
There
is
also
a
sign-in
sheet
for
interested
members
of
the
public
at
the
back
of
the
room.
No
decisions
are
made
at
public
meetings
concerning
applications.
Unless
otherwise
noted
the
public
meeting
is
held
to
gather
public
opinion.
A
Exemption
to
this
rule
is
outlined
in
bylaw
2006
75,
to
delegate
various
planning
approvals
to
staff
and
to
adopt
certain
procedures
for
the
processing
of
planning
applications
subject
to
delegated
authority.
Council
has
authorized
staff
to
use
discretion
in
determining
if
an
application
can
be
a
combined
public
meeting
comprehensive
report
to
expedite
the
approval
process.
A
Information
gathered
at
public
meetings
is
then
referred
back
to
planning,
building
and
licensing
services
staff
for
the
preparation
of
a
comprehensive
report
and
recommendation
to
Planning
Committee.
This
means
that
the
meeting
tonight
that,
after
the
meeting
tonight,
staff
will
be
considering
the
comments
made
by
the
public
in
their
further
review
of
the
applications.
When
this
review
is
completed,
a
report
will
be
prepared
making
a
recommendation
for
action
to
this
committee.
The
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
A
Interested
persons
are
advised
that
if
a
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
oral
submissions
at
a
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
before
the
bylaws
passed,
the
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appear
or
to
appeal
the
decision
of
counsel
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
Unless,
in
the
opinion
of
the
board,
there
is
reasonable
grounds
to
do
so,
so
we'll
move
along
and
I
apologize.
I
have
two
pieces
of
agenda
here.
That
first
public
meeting
that
we'll
hear
today
is
a
zoning.
A
Bylaw
amendment
request
his
file,
D
1403,
zero,
2017,
153
and
156
brach
Street,
so
we'll
call
that
forward.
I
will
introduce
staff
quickly.
Derek
O'shea
is
our
I
did
pronounce
it
right.
It
is
our
clerk,
a
planning
clerk,
Marty
Vendetti
is
the
manager
in
planning
and
if
you,
you
or
the
other
planners
could
introduce
themselves,
I
won't
embarrass
myself
by
not
knowing
everybody.
C
E
Good
evening
councillors,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Robert
Mello,
My,
partner
and
I.
My
partner
is
Joel
Ruffolo
and
I
have
a
long
history
of
responsible
property
stewardship
in
the
City
of
Kingston.
Our
intention
regarding
these
two
buildings
is
to
return
them
to
residential
and
sustainability,
with
Kingston
experienced
its
lowest
vacancy
rate
in
recent
decades.
This
much-needed
change
is
a
move
in
the
positive
direction.
E
A
D
You
mr.
chair,
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
Planning
Act,
a
notice
of
statutory
public
meeting,
was
provided
by
advertisement
in
the
form
of
signs
posted
on
the
subject
site
20
days
in
advance
of
the
public
meeting.
In
addition,
notices
were
sent
by
by
mail
to
all
63
property
owners
within
120
metres
of
the
subject
property.
To
date,
we
have
not
received
any
correspondence
with
respect
to
this
application.
A
E
D
A
G
You
mr.
chair,
just
to
add
to
that
the
property,
as
indicated
by
the
applicant,
has
been
vacant
for
a
significant
period
of
time,
given
that
it's
a
listed
property
with
respect
to
heritage,
it's
important
that
the
property
be
occupied.
An
ongoing
maintenance
occur
on
the
property
just
to
make
sure
ensure
that
there's
adaptive
reuse
of
a
structure
of
this
nature.
So
there's
a
lot
of
supporting
factors
with
respect
to
that.
You.
A
F
H
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
thanks
for
the
report
at
a
presentation:
Frank
Dixon,
495,
Alfred,
Department
to
K
7,
K
or
J
floor,
so
I
do
walk
by
there
regularly
and
in
principle,
I'm
supportive
of
the
change.
We
need
more
residential
accommodations
in
Kingston,
so
your
plan
to
transform
the
properties
back
into
that
status
is
I,
think
appropriate.
H
Just
report
isn't
may
not
quite
as
may
be
clear
and
thorough,
as
I'd
like
to
see
doesn't
actually
say
that
it's
listed,
although
the
planner
did
say
that
and
it's
not
designated
as
Heritage
right
so
I
believe
that
it
eats
from
somewhere
in
the
1830s
1840s.
That's
my
estimation.
I'm
looking
at
other
properties,
I
know
boat
on
a
decent
walks
and
it
seems
similar
architecture,
two
buildings
on
Broad
Street
down
between
King
and
Wellington,
on
the
sort
of
classic
Kingston
limestone
buildings.
H
So
as
to
see
more
about
that
in
the
report
and
the
I
know
you're
not
planning
any
changes
to
the
property.
At
this
point,
you
just
want
to
change
the
status
I'm,
not
changing
the
actual
physical
characteristics
of
it,
but
I
guess
well.
I
would
I
would
put
in
word
to
have
an
examination
of
heritage
designation,
carried
out
and
seeing
what
we
do
with
that
I
get
to
heritage
asset
that
we
could
do
more
with
and
I
guess.
That's
basically
the
end
booth
of
my
input,
all
the
best
with
your
plans.
Thank
you.
I.
A
E
Intention
is
to
maintain
the
exterior,
as
as
it
is,
and
to
make
all
the
improvements
to
make
sure
that
none
of
the
wood
is
going
to
be
breaking
down
any
more
than
what
it
is.
You
know
if
there's
any
pointing
that
needs
to
be
done.
You
know
it's
just
a
you
know.
It's
a
beaut
are
two
beautiful
buildings.
We
really
like
them
and
we're
you
know
we
want
to
maintain
the
stone
on
the
inside
there's
a
lot
of
beautiful
stone
and
brick
and
stuff
on
the
inside.
So
we
want
to
maintain
all
of
that.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
we'll
go
back
to
the
committee.
Are
there
any
questions
comments
from
the
committee,
seeing
none
we'll
look
for
a
mover
and
a
shaker
for
oh
I'm,
sorry,
this
is
a
public
meeting
only
I'm
asleep
at
the
switch
so
we'll
move
on
I'll
declare
this
public
meeting
closed
and
we'll
move
on
to
our
second
public
meeting
tonight.
E
I
So,
as
many
of
you
will
know,
McAdoo's
Lane
is
located
north
of
the
highway
between
the
401
and
bur
Brook
Road,
and
it's
bound
by
Division
Street
on
its
west
and
I
should
say:
division,
Perth,
Road
and
on
the
east,
it's
bound
by
Montreal,
Street,
battersea
Road,
and
it's
an
area
that
has
a
long
standing.
History
of
rural
industrial
uses,
quarries,
cement,
manufacturing,
landfills,
automotive
repair.
But
besides
that,
it
is
also
an
area
that
has
a
number
of
sensitive
land
uses
close
by
our
site
is
currently
vacant.
I
I
We
are
also
seeking
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
the
parcel
of
land
that
would
change
it
from
the
a1
zone,
to
a
rural
industrial
zone
and
in
the
future.
Should
this
application
be
successful,
we
would
be
seeking
a
site
plan
control
application
to
control
the
actual
development.
I
think
some
of
my
pictures
are
not
showing
up
for
some
reason
on
here
like
there.
A
I
Thank
you
mr.
chair
Thank
You,
mr.
Clerk
I've
probably
used
two
of
my
five
minutes,
so
thank
you
for
the
fixing
this
so
picking
up
where
I
left
off
I
was
just
speaking
to
the
required
planning
applications
just
diving
in
a
little
closer
to
the
site.
This
is
kind
of
showing
you
what
we're
trying
to
do,
which
is
a
logistics
terminal
which
is
basically
a
modern
way.
I
describe
it
in
plain
languages:
it's
a
modern
warehouse
facility
where
trucks
come
and
go
to
the
site
and
there's
actually
very
little
storage
of
product
on
site.
I
It
literally
goes
from
one
truck
on
to
another
and
leaves
the
site
and
carries
on
the
other
reason.
We
need
a
the
amendment.
The
Official
Plan
amendment
is
because
we're
proposing
an
engineered
water
solution.
This
is
an
area
that
is
not
serviced
by
municipal,
water
or
sewer,
but
it's
also
a
use
that
doesn't
have
a
high
demand
for
water
and
it's
an
industrial
area
with
a
lot
of
risk
for
contamination.
So
we
are
proposing
a
engineered
water
solution,
essentially
the
tank
solution
that
would
deal
with
water
to
service
the
property.
I
For
you
know,
kitchen
bathrooms,
and
also,
if
the
need
be
for
fire-
and
we
were
also
proposed
to
prevent
residential
use
from
the
site
as
a
result
of
our
water
solution,
so
that
you
can
see
that
the
building
itself,
when
you
look
at
the
area,
the
building
itself
is
quite
small.
It's
only
about
15,000
square
feet
and
the
majority
of
the
site,
even
in
terms
of
the
15
acres
of
this
development
I,
would
remain
in
a
natural
state.
I
This
is
also
just
kind
of
a
good
slide
to
kind
of
just
get
an
idea
of
where
some
of
those
sensitive
uses
are
close
by
I
had
noted.
There
are
the
Italian
club
in
two
homes
on
Italia
Lane
they're,
like
600
to
800
meters
away
and
there's
also
a
couple
of
houses
just
off
this
image
to
the
west
that
are
about
600
meters
away
and
then
further
houses
on
McAdoo's
Lane
on
the
east
side
that
are
about
close
to
a
kilometer
away.
I
And
you
know
just
speaking
again
to
the
the
reason
for
the
designation
is
one
to
bring
it
into
a
rural
industrial
designation
to
allow
the
use
and
then
the
site-specific
policy
to
deal
with
the
water
solution
and
the
prohibition
of
residential
use
in
terms
of
the
zoning
bylaw.
This
image
in
the
centre
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
zoning
for
the
area.
You
can
see
combination
of
open
space
and
industrial
designations
that
kind
of
surround
the
area.
I
There
are
a
few
a1
designations
that
have
either
are
vacant
or
have
houses
on
them
and,
generally
speaking,
an
a.1
designation
allows
for
residential
use
and
even
in
the
industrial
case,
allows
for
an
accessory
dwelling.
So
we're
actually
proposing
a
stricter
soem
for
the
property
they
would
not
allow
residential
use,
and
so
that
would
be
the
resulting
Official,
Plan
Amendment,
bringing
the
site
into
the
rural
industrial
designation,
and
it
would
also
become
a
special
policy
area
because
of
the
water
policy.
I
So
in
terms
of
the
zoning
bylaw
just
zooming
in
a
little
closer,
you
can
see
the
change
from
the
restrict
a
agriculture
to
a
general
industrial
zone
again
with
the
special
provision,
because
that
industrial
zone
actually
allows
for
accessory
residential.
Because,
generally
speaking,
you
know,
a
rural
industrial
business
might
be
like
a
welding
shop
on
the
back
of
a
person's
house,
so
not
necessarily
wrong
to
have
residential
uses.
But
in
the
case
of
what
we're
proposing
residential
uses
would
not
be
appropriate
with
disuse.
I
We
have
received
comments
from
one
of
the
neighbors
on
Italia
Lane,
specifically
related
to
noise
from
trucks,
backup
beepers,
as
well
as
heavy
traffic
on
McAdoo's
Lane,
and
we
have
reached
out
to
these
neighbors,
as
there
are
certain
measures
that
we
believe
we
can
implement
to
assist
with
their
concerns.
So
one
of
those
concerns
related
to
the
backup
beepers,
and
so
what
we
have
arranged,
at
least
at
this
point
in
time
with
one
of
those
landowners
is
to
basically
measure
the
noise
on
the
backup
beepers
in
particular
on
their
property.
I
The
noise
report
is
required
as
part
of
the
site
plan
control
process,
but
it's
a
processor
we're
going
to
initiate
immediately
to
get
those
answers.
The
heavy
truck
traffic
I
believe
is
an
issue
you'll
hear
about
from
those
residents
tonight.
Certainly
that's
a
challenging
one
for
us
to
deal
with,
given
the
other
users
on
the
proper.
What
I
can
say
from
speaking
with
my
client
is
that
the
orientation
of
McAdoo's
Lane
at
Montreal
Street
is
like
an
acute
angle.
So
the
the
approach
angle
is
not
ideal
for
trucks.
I
So,
that's
not
to
say
that
no
trucks
from
our
proposal
would
come
down
from
that
highway.
Exit
to
McAdoo's
Lane,
however,
the
Perth
roadside.
The
division
side
is
a
much
better
access
for
trucks,
it's
also
closer
to
our
site,
and
it
is
actually
our
intent
that
the
majority
of
our
access
would
be
from
that
highway
exit
instead.
I
So
to
conclude,
I
believe
the
application
is
consistent
with
provincial
policy
statement
and
even
though
an
amendment
is
necessary
to
the
official
plan,
it
is
consistent
with
the
broad
direction
of
the
opie
and,
ultimately,
the
zoning
bylaw
would
recognize
the
special
provisions
necessary
to
permit
this
development
and
I
am
pleased
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
C
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr.
chair,
through
you,
public
notice
for
this
application
in
public
meeting
was
provided
in
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act,
which
included
mailing
notice
to
25
properties
within
125
meters
within
120
metres
of
the
subject
site,
as
well
as
signage
being
posted
on
the
property
20
days
in
advance
of
this
meeting
in
regards
to
correspondence
staff
have
received
one
letter
of
Correspondence
to
date,
which
is
included
as
Schedule
A
on
tonight's
agenda,
and
additional
correspondence
in
the
form
of
a
petition
was
just
provided
to
the
committee
clerk
this
evening.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
K
I
can
explain,
but
the
petition
I've
accepted
it
on
behalf
of
my
role
within
the
City
Clerk's
department.
It
will
be
forwarded
on
through
the
typical
channels
and
then
through
counsel,
through
the
appropriate
Department
as
well,
but
if
you'd
like
counselor
Oh,
Sanok
I
can't
share
this
with
you
and
you
can
take
a
look
at
it
this
evening.
At
some
point.
A
K
J
Mr.
Kean
yeah
thanks
very
much
for
clarifying
how
many
of
the
acres
were
developed,
because
when
I
read
it,
it
seemed
like
all
of
it
was
going
to
so
now.
I
know
it's
just
those
15
acres
in
green
out
of
the
entire
90,
and
with
that
letter
that
we
got
with
those
suggestions
through
to
staff
that
those
on,
if
it's
possible
or
not
from
the
letter
that
would
be
addressed
in
the
comprehensive
report,
each
each
point
that's
made
in
the
letter.
C
A
Thank
you
any
further
questions
comments,
just
I'm
curious
about
what
the
anticipated
hours
of
operation,
because
I
know
we're
much
more
tolerant
of
noise
at
at
6:00
at
night
than
we
are
at
6:00
in
the
morning.
What
do
you
perceive
hours
of
operation
to
be
would,
and
this
might
be
a
staff
question?
Would
the
noise
bylaw
apply
to
this
property.
I
I'm
happy
to
start
mr.
chair
and
then
I'll
respond
on
the
noise
bylaw,
and
so
certainly
an
operation
like
this
is
a
24/7
operation.
Trucks
are
on
the
401
all
the
time.
Now,
however,
they
are
much
less
on
the
road
you
know
in
the
evening
and
nighttime
in
terms
of
transition,
but
certainly
our
intent,
that
it
would
be
a
24/7
operation
and
I
think
you
know
I
think
some
of
the
some
of
the
items
that
are
gonna
come
out
during
our
our
noise
study
are
going
to
dictate.
G
Thank
you
through
you,
mr.
chair,
the
noise
by
law
would
apply
to
this
I,
don't
know
the
specific
terms
and
conditions
or
the
provisions
within
the
bylaw
specifically
that
would
be
applicable,
but
we
can
clarify
that
coming
forward
in
the
comprehensive
report.
As
mr.
Kean
indicated,
there
is
a
noise
study
that
was
required
as
a
component
of
this.
G
A
I
Think
you
know
I
think
it's
is
this.
One
of
those
things
is
a
very
hard
balancing
act
because
obviously
the
highway
has
assigned.
This
is
one
of
these
detour
routes.
It's
a
route
that
trucks
are
capable
of
using,
but
I
think
you
know,
I
think
it's
one
of
those
things
where
the
Division
Street
exit
is
a
nicer
slope
like
it.
It
works
for
trucks
that
have
trailers
to
make
that
exit,
whereas
I
don't
know
if
I
have
an
image
that
might
show
it.
I
Let's
just
cut
off
the
the
challenge
on
Montreal
Street
from
a
large
truck
perspective
is
the
fact
that
that
it's
not
at
a
ninety
degree,
so
the
trucks
actually
have
four
trucks
have
to
cut
back
on
themselves
to
make
the
Montreal
Street
exit.
So
that's
why
many
of
the
smaller
trucks
that
operate
in
this
area
garbage
trucks
and
dump
trucks?
They
don't
have
the
larger
box
so
they're
able
to
make
that
turn
much
easier.
I
But
it's
it's
our
intent
to
use
the
other
side
and
I
think
you
know
recognising
the
interest
yeah
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
exclude
the
fact
that
there
are
two
residents
on
the
west
side
as
well
here
litter
right
at
Victory
Lane
by
the
little
car
dealership.
So
you
know,
I
want
to
be
very
conscious
that
there
are
folks
that
live
right
there
as
well,
but
certainly
the
folks
that
we've
discussed
about
the
truck
issues
that
already
exist
on
that
road.
A
L
Mr.
chair
and
committee,
my
name
is
Brenda
Hamilton,
my
husband
and
I
live
at
1110
Italia
Lane,
as
mentioned
in
our
submission.
We
own
two
residential
properties
on
Italia
Lane,
which
covers
approximately
22
acres.
Our
property
extends
to
the
gates,
the
tala
Canadian
Club
and
is
immediately
south
of
the
properties
fronting
on
Italian
achenes
Lane.
With
regard
to
the
current
application.
Our
first
concern
is
the
potential
noise
from
the
trucks
in
the
back
of
deepers.
We
recently
had
a
problem
with
another
which
was
quickly
resolved.
L
L
This
road
has
the
same
classification
as
the
roads
encounter
occurred
with
subdivision
under
the
classification
of
local
Road
is
supposed
to
be
able
to
handle
up
to
a
thousand
vehicles
a
day.
However,
the
majority
of
the
vehicles-
traveling
McAdoo's
Lane,
are
heavy
trucks,
with
some
hauling,
even
heavier
equipment
on
tandem
trailers.
The
proposal
just
six
Depot
acre
eight
additional
heavy
truck
traffic
of
20
to
80
trucks
per
day
for
an
already
busy
road
and
the
road
will
have
to
be
upgraded
to
meet
as
additional
traffic.
L
Due
to
the
number
of
accidents
on
the
401,
McAdoo's
Lane
has
become
more
active
with
transport
trucks
and
other
vehicles.
Whenever
the
401
is
closed.
There
are
also
many
heavy
vehicles
traveling
this
road
to
dispose
a
material
from
the
401
road
construction.
Many
passenger
vehicles
also
appear
to
use
this
route
as
a
means
to
avoid
the
401
construction
and
to
travel
to
Kingston
Mills
Road
to
access
highway
15
living
on
Italian
Lane
means
we
have
to
access
the
eastern
portion
of
McAdoo's
Lane
on
a
daily
basis.
Do
they
heavy
truck
traffic
on
McAdoo's
Lane?
L
We
do
not
travel
on
other
portions
of
the
road
because
there
are
many
potholes
mud,
dust
and
other
debris
from
a
truck
traffic.
These
heavy
trucks
are
definitely
traveling
at
higher
speeds
than
the
posted
speed
of
70
kilometres.
It
is
a
hazard
to
try
to
exit
Alaine
due
to
the
poor
visibility
of
oncoming
trucks
plus
trying
to
avoid
the
stones
that
spray
from
their
tires
when
they
travel
down
the
road.
L
My
understanding
from
the
residential
property
owners
of
Macanese
Lane
is
that
it's
just
as
difficult
for
them
to
exit
their
driveways,
if
not
more
so,
their
drivers
are
very
close
to
the
travel
portion
of
the
road,
so
the
gravel
etc
from
the
heavy
trucks
creates
a
definite
hazard
to
any
cars
parked
in
their
driveways.
The
majority
of
the
heavy
truck
traffic
along
macit
is
Lane
comes
from
businesses
at
the
western
end
of
McAdoo's
Lane
McAdoo's
Lane
is
accessible
from
both
Perth
Road,
which
is
outer
Division,
Street
and
also
Battersea
Road,
which
is
under
Montreal
Street.
L
However,
the
majority
of
these
heavy
trucks
travel
the
complete
length
of
McAdoo's
Lane
to
access
the
401
or
other
portions
of
the
city.
It
is
suggested
that,
in
order
to
alleviate
the
noise
dust,
mud
future
potholes
and
any
other
debris
caused
by
the
heavy
trucks
in
this
residential
section
of
the
road
that
all
heavy
truck
traffic
be
required
to
use
the
Perth
Road
entrance
to
both
enter
and
exit
McAdoo's
Lane.
This
will
create
a
heavy
truck
restriction
on
the
eastern
portion,
which
is
the
residential
portion
of
McAdoo's
Lane.
L
This
should
not
create
any
additional
travel
time
for
any
heavy
vehicles,
as
they
can
all
easily
access
the
401
and
other
sections
of
a
city
from
Division
Street.
There
are
signal
lights
and
turning
lanes
of
the
per
throat
entrance,
which
makes
it
much
safer
for
heavy
trucks
to
enter
onto
and
exit
from
McAdoo's
Lane.
The
Battersea
Road
intersection
only
has
a
stop
sign
with
a
flashing
light.
L
If
this
heavy
vehicle
restriction
were
to
put
in
place
would
have
to
be
waved
in
the
event
of
emergency
situations
that
McAdoo's
Lane
is
designated
as
an
emergency
detour
route.
Also,
an
exemption
would
have
to
be
provided
to
allow
regular
service
delivery
vehicles
to
access
the
residences
on
this
road.
So
we
are
requesting
that
the
eastern
portion
of
McAdoo's
Lane
from
Italia
Lane,
to
where
McAdoo's
Lane
meets
Battersea
Road,
be
designated
as
accessible
to
only
passenger
vehicles.
L
With
the
two
exemptions
I
just
mentioned,
we
are
requesting
this
restriction
restriction,
regardless
of
whether
the
conceptual
plan
is
approved
or
not.
I
have
provided
the
petition
to
the
committee.
Clerk
has
been
signed
by
a
hundred
percent
of
the
residential
landowners.
We
either
live
on
or
have
access
to
map
news
lane
on
a
daily
basis.
I
also
attach
photos
to
the
petition
that
my
husband
took
yesterday
of
two
large
trucks
trying
to
maneuver
the
turn
at
the
same
time
on
to
and
from
Battersea
Road
is
important
to
note
that
mr.
L
McCutcheon
for
Manitoulin
Transport
indicated
in
our
conversation
yesterday
the
many
of
the
trucks
she's
in
the
deep
pool
not
be
able
to
make
the
turn
on
Battersea
Road
anyway.
So
a
requirement
for
all
trucks
to
use
a
per
throat
entrance
to
enter
and
exit
McAdoo's
Lane
would
not
be
a
deal-breaker
for
them.
L
You'll
note:
on
page
5
of
my
submission
there
was
a
typo
I,
get
the
names
her
throat
and
Batterson
Road
mixed
up,
so
I
should
say
we're
requesting
from
Italian
to
her
McAdoo's
Lane
meets
Battersea
Road
and
it
says
per
thrown
in
there
so
I.
Thank
you
for
your
understanding
and
assistance
in
this
matter.
Thank.
H
H
I'm
supportive
in
principle
of
the
project
I'm
in
favor
of
business
development
and
I,
don't
live
nearby.
I!
Don't
have
the
local
knowledge
that
the
residents
would
have
for
these
matters,
but
so
it's
my
first
point
fairly
minor
one
since
you're
gonna
sever.
This
are
you
going
to
obtain
a
separate
street
address
designation,
that's
probably
a
fairly
routine
thing,
just
wondering
if
you
control
the
the
actual
proximity
mainly
to
the
Western
access,
which
is
off
peripheral,
ten
division.
H
You've
got
it
in
the
top
of
page
40,
it's
a
very
small
scale
and
just
hard
to
estimate
what
that
is.
Since
you
refer
to
it
at
your
presentation
right,
you
said
that
that's
going
to
be
where
the
trucks
are
going
to
act.
Accident'
enter
okay
with
respect
to
the
residence
petition.
I
would
like
to
know
what's
in
that
and
would
request
that
it
be
read
out
at
some
point
in
the
meeting.
H
H
Okay,
now
some
of
the
debate
and
questions
so
far
from
the
chair,
especially
and
just
try
to
picture,
what's
going
to
happen
on
the
site
if
the
project
is
approved
and
you're
looking
to
have,
basically
new
drivers
come
in
right
to
take
over
so
are
you
gonna
have
any
actual
facilities
there
on
on-site?
For
them,
you're
gonna
have
a
24/7
operation,
as
you
explained,
are
you
gonna
have
a
coffee
shop
or
a
lounge,
or
anything
like
that
available,
because
I
know
if
I
were
a
driver,
I
would
want
to
maybe
have
somewhere.
H
H
Thank
you
to
the
residents
who
made
a
very
thorough
presentation
earlier.
I
learned
a
lot
from
that
and
what
I'm
wondering
about
is
her
concern
was
over
the
traffic
levels
on
McAdoo's
Lane,
so
I'm
wondering
if
the
city
has
done
any
sort
of
traffic
studies
on
that.
She
seems
to
indicate
that
the
traffic
levels
are
quite
high
when
it
comes
to
transport
use
and
then
going
along
on
that
with
that
would
be
the
after
condition.
H
Wondering
if
maybe
the
eastern
access
to
to
Montreal
Street
Battersea
could
be
signalized
and
if
you're
going
to
have
anything
in
the
way
of
only
one-way
access?
Are
you
going
to
enforce
that
so
I
think
that's,
basically
all
I
have
to
say,
and
if
the
clerk,
which
is
like
I'm
right
those
points
up
and
then
send
them
in
independently,
so
they're
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
A
Further
questions
or
comments,
we'll
turn
to
our
staff
and
to
the
planner
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
as
I'm
sure
everybody's
aware,
we
are
only
speaking
to
land
use
questions
tonight,
so
questions
regarding
where
there
may
be
where
you
may
have
competitors
along
the
401,
isn't
really
relevant
to
what
the
work
at
hand.
So
thank
you.
I
Well,
thank
you
mr.
chair,
and
thank
you
MS
Hamilton
and
mr.
Dixon
for
the
questions
you've
noticed
someone's
joined
me
at
the
podium.
This
is
Terry
McCutcheon
from
Manitoulin
transport
and
he's
going
to
assist
with
some
of
the
questions
so
I'll
hit
on
some
of
the
questions
and
then
I'll.
Let
Terry
fill
in
the
gaps
and
and
help
with
some
of
the
logistics
about
the
operation.
In
terms
of
some
of
the
questions
that
mr.
I
Dixon
asked
so
I
think
I
think,
first
and
foremost,
we're
very
grateful
to
receive
the
comments
from
miss
Hamilton
and
the
petition,
because
it
helps
us
to
understand.
You
know
that
there
are
residential
uses
in
that
area
and
we're
very
willing
to
work
with
them
to
to
find
solutions,
work
with
them
to
deal
with
noise
and
assess
like
the
real
impacts
here
and
and
we're
we're
quite
confident
that,
because
of
the
distance
with
these
users
that
we
will
find
solutions
to
this
matter-
and
you
know
I-
think
you'll
you'll
hear
from
mr.
I
McCutcheon
that
the
primary
access
that
we
intend
to
use
is
Division
Street
and
division.
The
McAdoo's
Lane
is
approximately
two
kilometers
long.
That's
kind
of
the
you
know
if
you
think
of
exit
number
617
619
on
the
401.
Those
numbers
represent
kilometres,
so
McAdoo's
Lane
is
approximately
two
kilometers
long
and
our
site
is
approximately
600
meters
or
slightly
more
than
a
half
a
kilometre
from
Perth
Road.
So
it's
closer
to
Perth,
Road.
I
So,
ultimately,
so
right
now
this
is,
we
have
actually
attempted
to
do
the
consent,
application
first
ahead
of
the
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
site
plan
control,
but
because
we
are
proposing
a
unique
water
solution
we
had
to.
We
have
to
do
an
official
plan
amendment
first,
so
otherwise,
so
any
signage
you
would
have
seen
showed
that
the
whole
90
acre
property
as
raised
by
councillor
sanic,
but
the
application
is
only
for
this
western
piece.
I
I
M
Mister
chair
through
you
to
the
member
of
the
public,
asking
the
questions
about
the
details
of
our
operations
of
a
truck
terminal
just
trying
to
keep
it
brief.
We
have
two
essential
functions
of
a
truck
terminal
and
that's
basically
to
to
take
Goods
any
kinds
of
goods.
All
kinds
of
goods,
basically
saying
is,
if
you
bought
it,
a
truck
Roddick
from
local
pick
up
some
deliveries
and
local
could
be
in
Kingston
could
be
as
far
away
as
Nappanee
or
other
communities
in
the
area
bring
those
goods
to
the
terminal.
M
Those
goods
are
then
transferred
from
the
local,
pickup
and
delivery
vehicles
on
to
trucks
which
we
call
highway
units
and
are
further
taken
taken
to
further
points
in
the
country
and
even
in
the
United
States
and
other
points
in
North,
America
and
sometimes
in
the
world.
So
we
have
to
two
essential
operations:
a
local
pickup
and
delivery
operation,
where
we
have
local
drivers
based
on
the
Kingston
area
that
show
up
to
work
at
the
same
time.
Every
day
go
out
pick
up
the
products
they're
picking
up
in
the
Kingston
area,.
M
Doing
highway,
deliveries
and
and
and
taking
Freight
away
from
the
terminal
at
this
location,
there
will
be
facilities
in
the
building
for
lunch
facilities
and
that
sort
of
thing
this
won't
be
a
primary
hub,
though,
because
of
its
proximity
to
both
Montreal
and
Toronto.
So
the
highway
drivers
won't
likely
be
taking
rest
stops
here
at
this
facility,
so
it
won't
be.
There
won't
be
showering
facilities
or
if
there
are
there
to
speak
for
the
local
people,
there
won't
be
a
place
to
take
a
rest
or
a
nap
at
this
particular
facility.
C
Thank
you
for
you,
three
mr.
chair,
I,
guess
one
thing.
One
thing
to
add:
our
engineering
division
has
asked
for
preliminary
traffic
information
that
is
going
to
be
submitted
as
part
of
this
application,
and
so
the
purpose
of
that
is
to
determine
and
really
look
into,
the
proposed
routes
for
accessing
onto
the
401
traffic
volumes
and
traffic
times
to
better
inform
our
engineering
division
as
well.
C
G
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
yes,
I,
wouldn't
consider
it
to
be
a
non-statutory
public
meeting,
necessarily
because
notice
won't
be
provided
in
the
same
format.
However,
we
will
be
advancing
the
opportunity
for
the
public
to
start
speaking
to
comprehensive
reports
at
Planning
Committee.
It
was
to
start
this
evening.
However,
we
don't
have
any
comprehensive
reports
on
the
agenda
tonight.
Thank.
G
A
Thank
you
and
my
further
question.
So
don't
turn
your
bike
off
too
soon.
My
further
question
is:
do
you
anticipate
the
comprehensive
report
to
include
site
plan
recommendations?
I
see
you
looking
to
the
proponents
for
that?
In
the
reason
the
reason
I
ask
that
is
just
to
let
the
public
know
that
site
plan
and
correct
anything
that
I
may
miss
speak
here,
but
site
plan
is
a
delegated
authority
to
staff.
So
most
frequently
site
plan
is
negotiated
between
our
staff
and
the
proponents.
A
G
Chair,
yes,
that's
relatively
accurate
at
this
point.
We
don't
have
an
application
for
site
plan
control.
However,
we
can
work
with
the
applicant
to
have
a
more
detailed
concept
plan
at
a
minimum
in
terms
of
bringing
a
recommendation
forward
in
the
absence
of
that,
given
the
studies
that
are
being
done
and
some
of
the
other
details
that
we
will
be
looking
at
in
arriving
at
a
comprehensive
report-
and
it
looks
like
mr.
G
I
You
mr.
chair
I
just
want
to
add
that
you
know.
Typically,
we
wait
until
after
the
public
meeting
to
initiate
our
site
plan
application,
because
this
is
our
opportunity
to
hear
from
the
public
learn
how
our
applications
might
be
tweaked,
but
I
can.
What
I
can
tell
this
room?
Tell
the
neighbors
tell
this
committee
is
we're
starting
to
gear
up
for
our
site
plan
application
and
because
planning
is
an
front
process.
I
It's
to
our
benefit,
to
initiate
the
site
plan
before
this
committee
hopefully
has
a
recommendation
for
approval,
so
there
will
be
what
I
would
call
refining
details
to
the
site
plan.
The
current
conceptual
plan
that
we
have
that
will
be
available
for
public
viewing.
They
will
have
our
noise
comments,
so
the
infra
all
have
that
information
so
that
you
are
able
to
make
an
educated
decision
on
this
great.
A
And
for
members
of
the
public
site
plan
deals
with
parking
with
with
landscaping
with
fencing
and
those
all
likely
will
have
some
impact
on
some
of
the
questions
you've
raised
tonight.
So
thank
you.
Seeing
no
further
questions,
I
declare
this
meeting
closed
and
we'll
move
on
to
our
third
and
final
public
meeting,
which
is
held
pursuant
to
the
Planning
Act,
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
it's
for
2666
princess
Street
and
1027
Midland
Avenue.
A
I
Okay,
all
right
well
good
evening
again
and
this
this
is
an
application
for
a
so
nning
bylaw
amendment
on
Midland,
Avenue
and
Princess,
Street
and
I
want
to
take
the
opportunity
to
introduce
you
to
Brad,
chase
and
Brad
is
from
ibi
group
and
is
the
lead
architect
on
this
project
and
will
be
assisting
me
with
any
questions
this
evening
and
extra
information.
So
what
what
we
have
tonight
is
a
an
application
right
really
on
the
western
hub,
the
other
hub
of
princess
Sarie.
I
You
could
say
by
the
mall,
and
it
is
near
the
corner
of
Princess
and
Midland
close.
It's
really
at
the
edge
of
the
corridor,
the
princess
Street
corridor,
the
cat
town
center
bus
routes,
Park
schools,
the
library
is
there
and
it's
a
transition
area
between
a
commercial
and
residential
uses
which
I
will
which
I'll
show
you
in
a
moment
on
official
plan
image.
I
I
Within
the
first
floor
of
the
building,
there's
vast
amounts
of
community
indoor
amenity,
outdoor
amenity,
rooftop
amenity,
a
very
small
piece
that
I'll
show
you
and
the
site
would
have
access
to
both
princess
and
Midland
Avenue,
there's
currently
a
holding
provision
on
the
site
that
would
be
lifted
as
part
of
this
application.
We've
actually
never
been
able
to
determine
why
it's
there,
but
we
think
it
might
have
been
a
servicing
issue.
So
our
application
would
remove
that
through
the
studies
that
we've
done
so
dooming.
I
In
now,
on
the
actual
concept
plan,
you
can
see
how
our
site
wraps
around
the
mcdonald's
again
and
what's
being
proposed,
is
the
the
three-story
wings
which
are
the
Kerr.
Wings
are
abutting
the
residential
area
and
the
taller
portion
of
the
building
comes
toward
the
front
of
the
property
at
Princess
Street.
I
This
is
just
to
kind
of
help,
just
visualize,
how
we
see
at
least
some
preliminary
landscaping
for
the
site.
So
there
is
a
existing
pathway
on
the
western
boundary
of
the
property
that
we
that
will
be
maintained
and
that
we're
going
to
further
enhance
by
landscaping
it
on
the
north
side
of
the
property,
where
the
three-story
building
abuts
the
backyards
of
the
residential
neighbors.
There's
a
stormwater
management
facility
that
already
exists
there
for
the
residential
neighbors.
I
So
we're
going
to
put
a
pathway
close
to
the
building
and
then
we're
going
to
enhance
the
basically
the
storm
water
feature
with
landscaping:
a
lot
more
trees
to
really
dress
that
up.
That
area
is
kind
of
like
it's
private
but
at
the
same
time
it's
like
semi
public
because
of
the
way
that
it
it
excesses
out
to
Midland
Avenue.
So
that
is
something
that
you
know
would
be
available
for
people
coming
either
down
through
to
Princess
Street
or
to
East
out
to
Midland
Avenue,
and
you
can
see.
I
So
when
looking
at
the
ground
floor
plan,
let
me
just
turn
over
my
pages
here.
The
ground
floor
doesn't
contain
any
residential
units,
so
it's
primarily
made
up
of
indoor
parking
at
both
ends.
That
would
serve
as
tenants
and
staff,
but
it
also
contains
the
it
primarily
contains
the
amenity
areas,
a
bistro,
a
pool,
a
library,
a
chapel,
immediate
room,
fitness,
lockers
and
Lobby,
as
we
start
to
move
up
the
building.
I
Now,
as
I
move
to
the
fourth
floor,
you
can
see
that
the
care
wing
stop,
because
that
is,
that
is
the
roof
of
the
third
floor
and
there
is
a
small
and
it's
enclosed,
its
outdoor,
it's
a
rooftop
amenity
area
but
at
the
same
time
it's
enclosed
behind
the
roof.
So
it's
a
nice
closed
outdoor
amenity
space
on
that
roof
of
the
third
floor,
and
you
can
see
the
Independent
Living
Apartments
on
this
floor.
The
apartment
says
may
be
the
wrong
word:
I'm
gonna!
I
These
are
just
some
of
the
elevations
I'm
gonna
skip
to
the
3d
images
because
they
actually
tell
the
story
a
little
bit
easier
in
terms
of
looking
at
the
rendering.
From
from
this
angle,
you
can
see
the
gazebo
that's
proposed
close
to
Midland
Avenue.
You
know
they're
the
renderings
kind
of
show
the
transition
from
the
third
to
the
third
floor
and
then
the
sixth
floor
front
portion
at
princess
Street,
and
you
can
see
the
you
can't
really
see
the
rooftop
amenity,
but
the
rooftop
amenity
is
in
my
mouth.
I
The
rooftop
amenity
is
in
the
that
upper
portion
of
that
third
floor
of
the
center
on
the
image
so
I'm.
Just
looking
at
access
from
Midland
Avenue,
you
can
kind
of
see
the
McDonald
just
kind
of
grayed
out
at
the
front
of
the
image
in
terms
of
what
you
would
look
at
if
you're
looking
through
Midland
Avenue
and
then
turning
around
from
the
other
angle.
I
Looking
at
Penn's
Princess
Street,
looking
at
the
front
entrance,
which
is
fairly
central
to
the
property
with
with
our
our
public
parking
tenant
parking
there
at
the
front
of
the
building
as
well-
and
you
know,
with
this
being
an
l-shaped
building
that
you
can
see,
it's
been
a
challenging
sight
to
to
design.
We've
tried
to
meet
principles
of
pulling
the
building
close
to
princess
Street,
while
also
keeping
our
our
height
slow,
as
we
abut
the
residential
neighbors
at
the
rear.
I
So
in
terms
of
the
Official
Plan,
the
top
image
is
really
the
city
structure
schedule.
So
what
you
can
see
there
and
our
plan,
which
is
a
corridor
and
nodes
plan?
You
can
see
the
orange
circle,
which
is
really
at
Gardner
and
princess,
but
it
kind
of
extends
to
Midland
Avenue
right
at
the
edge,
and
you
can
see
how
from
a
city
structure
perspective
we
are.
We
are
at
this
point
of
being
a
node
where
a
housing
district
or
a
business
district
where
a
center
and
we're
a
corridor.
I
And
then,
when
you
look
at
the
lower
image,
that's
showing
the
land
use
schedule
and
you
can
see
that
our
site
is
entirely
in
an
arterial
commercial
land
use,
designation
and
medium
and
high
density
residential
uses
are
permitted
in
the
arterial
commercial
designation
when
the
property
abuts
other
residential
land
uses.
So
in
this
case
an
official
plan
amendment
is
not
necessary
because
of
that
abutting
residential
use
and
the
semi
residential
semi
institutional
nature
of
our
project
conforms
to
the
official
plan.
I
So
the
site
is
already
zoned
commercial
and
the
zoning
bylaw
is
not
up
to
date
with
the
Official
Plan.
So
we
need
an
amendment
that
would
allow
our
senior
supportive
living
facility
on
this
property.
So
what
we're
actually
seeking
is
to
permit
a
apartment
dwelling,
because
that's
the
way
it's
defined
in
that
bylaw
and
that's
the
way
the
city
has
handled
other
supportive
living
situations
like
this.
I
So
overall,
the
application
is
consistent
with
the
provincial
policy
statement.
It
certainly
meets
the
intent
to
the
strategic
direction
of
the
Official
Plan
and
it's
a
it's.
A
good
transitional
use
with
the
residential
neighbors
on
this
site
and
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
would
recognize
a
number
of
specific
provisions
to
control
the
development
that
we
are
proposing
and
there's
a
future
site
plan
application
that
would
be
forthcoming
and
I
do
have
some
of
this
very
specific
zoning
amendments.
If
you
want
to.
I
If
you
want
to
speak
to
any
of
those
specifically
I,
think
the
one
that
I
want
to
bring
to
your
attention.
The
most
important,
because
many
members
on
this
committee
have
seen
our
use
of
height
maps
for
for
downtown
facilities
where
we're
putting
a
tall
building
on
a
small
site.
In
this
case
because
of
the
sheer
size
of
the
site
and
the
fact
we're
really
mostly
proposing
a
three-story
building.
I
What
we've
proposed
to
control
height
on
this
site
is
to
limit
the
height
to
three
storeys,
twelve
and
a
half
meters,
basically
close
to
the
residential
users,
and
then
the
the
six
storey
portion.
The
22
story
portion
would
also
be
limited
within
26
meters
of
a
residential
zone,
so
that
so,
basically
allowing
all
seniors
care
the
owner
of
the
land.
A
little
bit
of
flexibility.
I
B
You
mr.
chair
staff
confirmed
that
notification
of
this
public
meeting
this
evening
has
been
completed
in
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act.
The
mail
out
notification
included,
sixty-seven
property
owners
to
date.
Staff
have
not
received
any
written
correspondence
with
respect
to
the
proposed
zoning.
Amendment
staff
have
fielded
a
couple
of
telephone
inquiries
which
provided
some
positive
remarks
about
the
proposed
development.
J
You
mr.
chair,
through
you,
yeah
I,
think
the
site
plan,
or
this
concept
plan
looks
very
thoughtful
and
I
think
that's
great,
that
the
mail
out
went
to
67
homes
and
only
positive
comments
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
anyone
is
here
tonight
to
speak
to
it,
but
that
seems
really
promising.
I
was
going
to
ask
about
that
Western
pathway,
because
I
know
it's
been
used
for
many
many
years
and
we
get
comments
on
about
its
like
I
know
this
past
summer
there
is
wild
person
up
there
and
now
all
this
will
be
dug
out.
J
I
So
through
you,
mr.
chair,
that
it
is
actually
a
legal
right
of
way
that
was
established
when
the
subdivision
was
created
so
now
that
now
that
we
will
essentially
maintain
control
over
that
pathway,
I
just
go
to
my
landscape
plan.
You
know
it.
This
project
is
geared
toward
seniors,
so
our
intention
is
to
make
all
the
paths
hard
concrete
asphalt.
So
it
will
be
a
hard
surface,
all
the
way
to
princess
Street
and
now
again
with
having
some
control
over
that
easement.
I
J
Thank
you,
and
thanks
also
for
doing
a
landscape
buffer
between
the
back
of
the
building
and
the
homes,
because
I'm
sure
that's
a
point
that
would
have
been
raised
by
some
residents,
so
that's
great
to
see
too,
and
also
how
you're
doing
three
stories
at
the
back
to
again
give
protection
as
a
buffer.
You
know
to
the
back
of
the
homes,
so
my
only
question
is
I.
J
Do
know
that
this
intersection
is
really
really
busy
I'm
very
familiar
with
it
right,
because
my
daughter
did
Kingston
domestics
down
the
street
for
so
many
years
so
many
times
a
week,
so
four
to
go
if
you're
going
south
on
Midland.
Well,
if
you're
using
Midland
Avenue,
do
you
expect
visitors
to
the
home
to
go
off
of
Milman
or
to
always
use
princess
tree?
Would
it
just
be
surface
vehicles
I'm,
accessing
the
home
from
Midland,
Avenue
or,
like
you,
can
a
yeah
I
can?
I
So
a
couple
things
here:
we've
done
a
traffic
report
because
Midland
Avenue
has
to
be
upgraded,
we're
kind
of
like
the
last
person
in
the
queue
that's
gonna
make
some
of
those
Midland
Avenue
upgrades
that
are
required.
So,
basically,
when
this
site
starts,
the
Midland
Avenue
exit
right
now,
which
you
can
make
left
turns
on,
won't
be
any
more.
It
will
be
a
right
in
right
only
and
so
at
that
point
the
that
really
that
area
of
the
parking
is
going
to
service
deliveries.
I
J
N
Yeah
I
like
it
to
it,
I
think
it's
a
great
location
for
it.
I
just
wondered
the
land
just
to
the
to
the
West.
There
are
we
creating
a
land
lock
situation,
there's
just
no
potential
for
for
this
to
be
developed
like
a
wouldn't.
It
make
sense
to
take
the
whole
whole
piece
right
up
to
you,
Leon,
so
whatever
it
is
there,
but
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
can
but
my
point,
it
would
be
nice
to
fill
that
area
up
or
is
that
actually
still
developable
is
that
to
the
west?
So.
I
N
N
F
I
And
I
think
if
I
miss
some
mr.
chase,
Oh
speak
up
as
well.
I
have
some
of
these
listed
here
so
the
main
floor.
There's
a
bistro.
So
when
you're
visiting
relatives
there's
a
bistro
that
would
be
available,
there's
a
pool,
a
library,
a
chapel,
a
media
room,
fitness
room,
lockers
Lobby
and
then
there's
like
there's
some
like
rooms
on
the
upper
floors,
where
you
would
have
some
things
like
physiotherapy
and
other
other
training.
You
can
see
from
the
screen.
There's
a
fair
bit
of
landscaped
outdoor
space.
I
F
I
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
so
that
you
know
this
is
something
that
we
had
much
discussion
about
was
you
know,
would
we
would
we
have
sufficient
parking
and
we're
actually
meeting
like
the
parking
requirements
for
living
of
this
nature,
which
is
there
are
over
90
spaces?
So
in
terms
of
assisted
living
versus
care
facility?
That's
about
half
of
the
spaces.
Are,
you
could
say,
people
that
are
independent
and
come
and
go
so
we're
actually
meeting
the
bylaw
requirements
generally,
which
are
about
half
the
space
per
per
unit?
A
A
I
Well
to
you,
mr.
chair,
certainly
the
the
sidewalks
and
the
driving
surfaces
are
intended
to
be
paved,
but
you'll
notice.
How
like,
across
the
north
side
of
the
property,
is
an
easement
for
storm
water,
catchment
of
the
residential
neighborhood
to
the
north,
but
our
engineers
looked
at
it
and
we
have
opportunities
to
improve
that
feature
so
that
it
will
become
a
bit
more
of
a
mixed
amenity.
I
You
know
look
more
like
a
stream
and
allow
it
to
you
know,
draw
in
that
groundwater
flow
and
some
of
the
things
I
missed
earlier,
there's
actually
going
to
be
some
gardens
that
that
the
people
will
be
able
to
plant
themselves
that
live
there.
So
there's
many
areas
that
are
grassy
or
gardened
that
we'll
be
able
to
take
in
that
that
flow
as
well,
but
but
certainly
the
paved
surfaces
right
now
would
be
interlocked
concrete
and
pavement
largely
dealing
with
accessibility,
but
I
think
you
know.
Certainly
it's
going
to
be
a
very
nice
place.
I
O
That's
a
new
code
requirement
coming
in
next
year
that
we
do
have
about
I,
think
30
parking
spaces
under
the
building
or
within
the
building,
and
the
new
Ontario
Building
Code
requires
15%
of
those
cars
to
have
electric
charging
stations
so
they're,
seeing
that
future.
So
it
will
be
incorporated.
I
appreciate.
A
O
Certainly
we
we
haven't
provided
in
indoor.
We
can
certainly
have
enough
space
for
outdoor
parking,
but
there
might
be
some
opportunities
in
the
covered
parking
for
for
bicycles
as
well.
First
staff,
certainly
the
residents
we
haven't
seen
that
demand,
but
definitely
staff,
even
visitors,
I
think
would
be
nice
to
provide
that.
Yes,
great.
H
Chair,
thank
you
for
presentation
and
the
report
so
I'm
supportive
in
principle
of
the
proposal
you're
using
vacant
land,
excellent,
infill,
you're
near
arterials
on
transit,
seems
to
be
a
very
attractive
design
and
you
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
the
actual
logistics
of
how
it's
going
to
work.
So
that's
all
really
impressive.
At
this
stage.
It's
an
introductory
stage
that
we're
at
okay.
So
now
it's
starting
into
my
questions,
you're
speaking
about
the
house
that
is
going
to
come
down
as
part
of
the
proposal
should
it
go
through.
H
Is
this
like
1027
Midland
in
the
north
eastern
section
of
the
property
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
anything
of
interest
with
that
house,
he
didn't
say
anything
in
the
report
about
that,
nor
in
presentation.
So
I'm
just
want
to
get
that
question
on
the
record.
It's
not
a
nice
design
or
a
heritage
aspect
that
we
don't
know
about
so
that
question
out
there.
H
Now
in
the
presentation
we
heard
about
a
a
possible
parking
structure
and
I'm
just
wondering
where
boats
that
is
on
the
site,
because
I
was
unable
to
figure
that
out
either
from
the
slides
or
the
material.
That's
in
the
agenda
package,
so
it
would
seem
that
you
would
want
to
have
it
maybe
closer
to
the
residence
so
that
you
know
you
can
park
and
then
go
right
in
so
that's
good.
Now,
I'm
gonna
get
into
a
bit
more
of
the
critical
side.
H
H
H
H
A
I
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
thank
you
mr.
Dixon,
so
the
house
on
Midland
Avenue
is
a
bungalow
of
no
significant
value
in
terms
of
heritage.
The
parking
structure
is
within
the
first
floor.
So
let
me
just
get
to
my
first
floor
here,
and
so
you
can
see
on
the
care
wing.
On
the
east
side,
there
is
some
parking
represented
and
in
the
southern
wing
of
the
first
floor,
there's
also
some
parking
represented
and
in
terms
of
staff
members
a
day
shift
would
have
20
to
30
people
working
on-site.
I
It's
a
three
shift
operation
so
the
afternoon
and
evening
shifts
would
be,
would
be
slightly
less
people,
but
but
you
could
see
that
it
facility
like
this,
would
certainly
employ
60
people
and
possibly
a
few
more
than
that
and
I'm
also
happy
to
address
mr.
Dixon's
question
with
respect
to
readability
of
reports,
because
because
I
think
what
mr.
Dixon
is
having
trouble
reading
is
the
information
that's
in
your
printed
package,
because
none
of
my
reports
are
56
pages
long,
so
I
don't
have
a
page
56.
I
So
what
I
can
suggest
is
that
when
you're
reviewing
our
applications,
it's
public
information,
we
submit
our
documents
digitally,
but
at
the
same
time,
in
making
our
documents
we
print
them
at
8
and
a
half
by
11
to
verify
if
they're
readable.
So
if
you
go
to
the
online
hub
and
go
to
our
application,
you
can
you
can
download
our
reports
and
view
them
digitally,
and
we
produce
our
reports
at
a
very
high
resolution
which
actually
allows
you
to
zoom
in
much
more
than
eight-and-a-half
by
eleven
and
then
I'm
sure
mr.
I
Dixon
will
be
able
to
view
those
details,
and
so
that
would
be
true
of
all
applications.
I
believe
the
challenges
may
be
with
the
package
that
you
have,
which
is
reduced
to
make
it
all
fit,
and
and
therefore
some
of
that
image
quality
is
lost.
But
I
would
like
to
ensure
mr.
Dixon
that
my
images
are
very
high-quality
and
readable
and
I
would
encourage
him
to
read
our
stuff
online.
A
A
A
So
that
brings
us
down
to
approval
of
the
agenda
with
that
withdrawal
moved
by
Councillor
sanic
seconded
by
vice
chair,
Turner
I've
got
to
get
in
the
habit
of
saying
that
it's
all
those
in
favor
of
the
agenda
carried
confirmation
of
minutes
from
our
previous
meeting,
not
a
minute.
None
here:
disclosure
of
pecuniary
interests.
A
That
takes
us
to
motions,
already
motions,
seeing
none
notices
of
motion
seeing
none
other
business,
seeing
none.
We
did
receive
some
correspondence
comments,
seeing
none
date
of
art
and
time
of
our
next
meeting,
January
4th
we
should
all
have
recovered
by
then
oh
I'm.
Sorry,
thank
you.
Mrs.
Benedetti.