►
Description
Planning Committee meeting from May 18, 2017. For the full meeting agenda visit https://goo.gl/RsUpdB
A
We're
not
sure
if
councillor
Neill
will
be
coming,
rushing
down
the
hall
in
a
few
minutes,
but
we
do
have
quorum
so
we'll
get
started
good
evening.
Everyone
I'm
Liz,
Schell
I'm,
chair
of
the
Planning
Committee,
and
we
have
with
us
members
of
our
committee,
councillor
McClaren,
councillor
osanic
and
councillor
Turner.
We
have
a
number
of
city
staff
with
us
this
evening.
Our
Commissioner
hurdle
director
egg,
new
manager
Vendetti,
and
we
have
a
number
of
planners
with
us,
I'm,
not
sure.
A
A
We
do
have
a
number
of
public
meetings,
Owen.
Of
course
our
clerk
James
Thompson.
So
we
do
have
a
regular
preamble
when
there
are
public
meetings
which
we
have
two
of
tonight's
notice
of
collection,
personal
informations
collected
as
a
result
of
this
public
hearing
and
on
the
forms
provided
at
the
back
of
the
room,
is
collected
under
the
authority
of
the
Planning
Act
and
will
be
used
to
assist
in
making
a
decision
on
this
matter.
A
All
names
addresses
opinions
and
comments
may
be
collected
and
may
form
part
of
the
minutes
which
will
be
available
to
the
public
questions
regarding
this
collection
should
be
forwarded
to
the
Director
of
Planning,
building
and
licensing
services.
The
purpose
of
public
meetings
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
forum,
as
required
by
the
Planning
Act
following
presentations
by
the
applicant
committee.
Members
will
be
afforded
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
for
clarification
or
further
information.
The
meeting
will
then
be
opened
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions.
A
Interested
persons
are
requested
to
give
their
name
and
address
for
recording
in
the
minutes.
There
is
also
a
sign-in
sheet
for
interested
members
of
the
public
at
the
back
of
the
room.
No
decisions
are
made
at
public
meetings
concerning
applications
unless
otherwise
noted
the
public
meeting
is
held
to
gather
public
opinion.
Exemptions
to
this
rule
is
outlined
in
bylaw
number
2000,
675
to
delegate
various
planning
acts,
but
various
planning
approvals
to
staff
and
to
adopt
certain
procedures
for
the
processing
of
planning
applications
subject
to
delegated
authority.
A
A
Information
gathered
is
then
referred
back
to
planning,
building
and
licensing
services
staff
for
the
preparation
of
a
comprehensive
report
and
recommendation
to
Planning
Committee.
This
means
that
after
the
meeting
tonight,
staff
will
be
considering
the
comments
made
by
the
public
in
their
further
review
of
the
applications.
When
this
review
is
completed,
a
report
will
be
prepared
making
an
application
for
action
to
this
committee.
The
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
A
This
committee
then
makes
a
recommendation
on
the
applications
to
City
Council
City
Council
has
the
final
say
on
the
applications
from
the
city's
perspective.
Following
Council
decision
notice
will
be
circulated
in
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act,
and
anyone
with
an
interest
in
the
matter
may
file
an
appeal.
Interested
persons
are
advised
that
if
a
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
oral
submissions
that
a
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
before
the
bylaw
is
passed,
the
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal
the
decision
of
council
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
A
A
B
Good
evening,
madam
chair
planning
committee
members
of
the
public
and
staff,
my
name
is
Nikola
Claire
I'm,
a
land
use
planner
with
faux
tent
consultants
I'm
here
to
present
this
application
for
zoning
bylaw
amendment
at
950,
Centennial
Drive,
so
the
property
we're
looking
at
is
a
just
under
3
hectare
parcel
in
the
city's
West
End,
just
in
the
sort
of
the
northern
part
of
Waterloo
Village,
and
separates
a
portion
of
Waterloo
Village
from
the
commercial
uses
on
princess
street.
It's
in
an
area,
that's
very
well
serviced
from
a
commercial
perspective.
There's
grocery
store
pharmacy
restaurants.
B
There
there's
also
some
services,
doctor's
offices
and
so
on,
and
it's
just
off
of
Princess
Street
as
well.
So
it's
got
excellent
transit
service
on
the
Express
routes
and
as
I'm
sure
you're.
No
doubt
aware
there
is
a
seven
story
building
being
built
on
the
site
right
now
that
is
being
built
under
the
current
site
plan
control
agreement
and
it's
a
retirement
home.
It
proposes
165
units
and
it
makes
of
both
standard
dwelling
units
and
also
retirement
home
Suites.
B
B
So
if
I
can
give
you
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
a
current
site
plan
in
the
building
that's
being
built
now
it
meets
all
of
the
zoning
standards
except
for
parking.
So
there
was
a
parking,
a
minor
variance
for
the
parking
stall
lengths
approved
for
a
while
ago
that
reduced
the
length
from
six
meters
to
five
and
a
half
meters.
You
can
see
and
I'm
just
going
to
try
and
use
my
mouse
here.
The
main
building
is
being
built.
B
This
kind
of
l-shaped
building
would
require
parking
to
the
north,
the
parking
lot
to
the
south
here
and
into
the
southeast.
There
is
a
second
phase
of
construction,
that's
intended
as
well,
which
would
require
the
balance
of
that
eastern
portion
of
the
site
to
be
developed
for
parking.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
current
zone
standard
of
1.1
spaces
for
per
unit
leads.
It
is
real
oversupply
of
parking,
so
the
reason
that
we're
here
this
evening
is
to
help
facilitate
a
site
plan
control
amendment
in
the
future.
B
That
would
allow
for
a
much
more
efficient
use
of
the
property.
So
what
you
can
see
on
the
screen
here
in
blue
on
the
right
hand,
side
if
I'm
using
my
mouse
over
here-
is
this
memory
care
facility.
This
memory
care
center,
it's
a
three-story
building
that
would
be
built.
There's
also
a
little
bit
of
office
space,
a
medical
office,
I
should
say
right
over
here
and
in
order
to
make
this
happen,
the
parking
standard
would
have
to
be
reduced
and
that's
what
we're
seeking
tonight.
B
The
total
combined
building
this
this
whole
concept
of
lis
to
a
total
of
377
dwelling
units
and
the
parking
requirement
would
be
a
hundred
and
fifty
three
based
on
the
ratio
that
we're
proposing,
which
is
0.6
bases
per
dwelling
unit
and
also
utilizing
an
equivalency
of
two
retirement
home
Suites
to
one
dwelling
unit,
which
would
basically
have
the
requirement
for
for
retirement
home
suites.
So
this,
if
this
parking
ratio
sounds
a
little
familiar,
it
is
the
same.
B
That's
used
at
the
Waterford
retirement
home
in
Cataraqui
north,
and
it
is
more
in
line
with
industry
standards
for
retirement
home
uses.
There
was
a
parking
study
done
on
the
site
that
evaluated
the
needs
from
an
industry
perspective.
It
looked
at
other
zoning
bylaws
in
the
city
of
Kingston
and
also
it
compared
to
the
retirement
home
parking
requirements
in
the
city
of
London
for
a
comparable
city
and
found
that
this
requirement
was
very
much
in
line
with
those
industry
standards
and
best
practices.
B
So,
looking
at
the
planning
a
little
bit
and
briefly,
the
properties
designated
arterial
commercial,
which
does
allow
this
higher
density
of
residential
use,
the
parking
reduction
meets
the
needs
of
the
site,
as
shown
through
the
parking
study
and
won't
result
in
any
adverse
effects
for
any
neighboring
properties.
It
would
also
it's
also
intended
to
help
facilitate,
is
much
more
efficient
use
of
the
subject
site
and
allow
for
a
little
bit
more
landscape
to
open
space.
B
Looking
at
the
zoning,
the
property
is
currently
subject
to
a
site-specific
zone
which
includes
the
properties
to
the
north
as
well.
It
allows
gland
use
and
that's
why
the
building
is
able
to
be
built,
as
is
it.
The
zoning
standards
are
all
met
to
the
proposal,
except
for
that
parking
requirement
and
I'll
just
jump
into
the
next
slide.
To
show
you
a
little
bit
more
detail
of
what
this
parking
requirement
means
for
the
property.
B
So
reduction
is
0.6
spaces
per
unit
and
then
effectively
0.3
spaces
for
retirement-home
sweets
would
lead
to
a
required
a
total
number
of
126
spaces
for
the
retirement
hall
and
memory
care
center.
There's
no
proposal
to
reduce
that
medical
office
parking
requirement
at
17.
It
would
yield
a
total
of
143
spaces
on
the
proposed
site
plan,
including
the
memory
care
center
there's
actually
a
hundred
fifty
three
spaces,
so
this
requirement
would
be
exceeded
a
little
bit
so
to
wrap
up
very
quickly.
B
The
zoning
bylaw
man
here
is
to
reduce
the
parking
in
order
to
allow
a
much
more
efficient
use
of
the
subject
site
it's
in
conformity
with
the
Official
Plan
and
the
provincial
policy
statement,
and
it's
suitable
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
retirement
home
residents,
visitors,
staff
and
it's
a
standard-
that's
been
applied
previously
in
the
city
of
Kingston.
So
through
you,
madam
chair,
invite
any
questions
from
Planning,
Committee
or
public.
B
C
You,
madam
chair
staff,
can
confirm
that
the
notice
requirements
for
this
public
meeting
have
been
completed
in
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act.
They
notice
the
public
meeting
was
mailed
to
134
property
owners
for
this
application
and
to
date,
staff
not
received
any
correspondence.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
C
Madam
chair,
that
easement
was
reviewed
through
the
site
plan
control
application
for
the
building
under
construction.
It
is
associated
with
the
utilities
Kingston
easement,
which
limits
the
amount
of
landscaping
that
can
be
planted
along
the
easement.
The
utilities
Kingston
will
allow
a
pathway
which
has
been
shown
on
the
by
plan
to
allow
an
east-west
connection
so.
D
I
just
bring
that
up
because
a
lot
of
the
residents
on
Oxbridge
Crescent,
like
the
trees
that
are
there
against
their
fence,
they
see
it
as
a
privacy
issue
and
shade
in
the
wintertime
or
sorry
in
the
summertime,
and
in
many
cases
they
most
certainly
would
not
like
those
trees
cut.
So
that's
just
something
to
share
with
you.
Thank
you.
Surya.
C
C
E
Very
quickly,
I,
when
I
was
looking
at
this
this
proposal.
My
only
question
about
the
reduced
parking
is,
isn't
so
much
the
required
parking
for
the
the
residents,
but
my
mother
was
in
her
seniors
home
for
a
number
of
years,
and
there
was
always
an
issue
with
visitors
parking
and
because
this
borders
on
a
residential
area,
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
anticipate
that'll,
be
enough
parking
for
a
busy
weekend
of
visitors.
Or
will
we
be
getting
peep
overflow
on
to
residential
streets.
B
F
A
Other
questions
from
the
committee
seeing
then
I'll
open
it
to
the
floor
to
members
of
the
public
to
any
members
of
the
public,
kept
comments
about
this
plan
application.
Seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
presentation
and
I'll
close
that
public
meeting
and
I
will
open
our
next
public
meeting,
and
this
is
193
Resource,
Road,
applicant
Quinte
crane
and
it's
an
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application.
A
G
Okay
good
evening
madam
chair
committee,
members
staff
and
members
of
the
public,
my
name
is
Marco
Chechen
I'm,
a
land
use
planner
with
McIntosh
fairy
mat
Josh
berry
has
been
retained
by
clinky
Crane
as
the
agent.
With
respect
to
the
subject
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
before
you
this
evening,.
G
The
lands
subject
to
the
proposed
development
are
located
in
the
Cataraqui
estates:
Business
Park,
proximately,
110
meters,
west
of
the
intersection
of
resource
road
and
Centennial
Drive
and
described
as
part
of
flock
or
unregistered
plan.
13
M
86
in
the
City
of
Kingston.
The
subject
plans
were
created
by
the
City
of
Kingston
and
are
now
musically
known
as
193
resource
Road.
So
many
clans
are
approximately
1.01
hectares,
an
area
with
approximately
a
hundred
meters
of
frontage
on
resource
Road.
G
G
So
the
proposal
for
the
subject
lands
includes
the
construction
of
a
2,000
230
square
meter,
building
to
store
at
maximum
of
four
mobile
cranes
and
contains
a
small
office
space.
The
front
of
the
building
parking
area
proposed
for
the
west
and
side
in
the
rear
of
the
building,
with
a
relatively
large
hard
surface
area,
to
accommodate
the
large
turning
movements
required
by
the
mobile
cranes
and
you'll
see
a
little
bit
more
detailed
site
plan
on
the
next
slide.
G
Visitor
parking
is
proposed
for
the
front
of
the
office
building
and
under
the
existing
Official
Plan
designation
and
zoning
bylaw
proposed
indoor
storage
of
equipment
use
is
not
permitted.
So
an
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
are
required
to
permit
through
post
indoor,
storage
of
equipment,
use
and
a
site
plan.
Application
was
also
required
and
has
been
submitted
concurrently.
G
G
Here
you
can
see
the
proposed
actual
building
on
me,
so
the
very
top
you
see
the
the
front
of
the
building
with
the
stone
and
steel
cladding
facade,
along
with
the
timber
frame
canopies
over
each
door,
along
with
the
large
four
doors
for
the
cranes
and
a
couple
of
man,
doors
as
well,
and
then
at
the
back.
What
you
see
is
second
from
the
top
image
you
see
the
the
rear
of
the
building
with
the
again
with
the
four
doors
because
it
clip
the
cranes
have
to
drive
through.
G
Will
just
get
into
some
policy
context.
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
matters
of
provincial
interest,
as
expressed
in
the
2014
provincial
policy
statement,
because
the
subject
lands
are
located
in
a
settlement
area
and
within
a
registered
plan
of
subdivision,
which
PPS
notes
shall
be
the
focus
of
growth
and
development.
G
G
Moving
on
to
the
Official
Plan,
the
subject:
lands
are
designated
Business,
Park
industrial,
you
can
see.
The
little
star
look
indicates
the
location
of
the
site.
Again,
indoor
storage
of
equipment
is
not
permitted
use
under
the
designation
and
therefore
an
official
plan.
Amendment
is
required
to
promote
the
development.
G
So
it
is
my
opinion
that
the
proposal
meets
the
intent
of
the
purpose
of
the
city's
official
plan,
because
development
is
located
within
the
urban
boundary
and
on
and
on
existing
municipal
services.
The
development
has
been
designed,
promote
enhanced
access
to
the
site
for
visitors,
employees
and
that's
part
of
those
large
entrances.
I
promotes
and
protects
employment
opportunities
for
the
provision
of
rentable
office
space,
in
addition
to
the
klinke
cranes
corporate
office.
G
So
the
office
space
will
be
split
in
half
the
development
and
addition
of
indoor
storage
or
equipment
as
where
use
is
compatible
with
uses
likely
to
occupy
the
remainder
of
the
Business
Park
industrial
designation
and
the
Cataraqui
estates.
Business
Park,
it's
been
appropriately
sized
to
collimate
the
use
and
prevent
negative
impacts,
while
landscaping
at
the
front
provide
additional
privacy
and
also
on
the
sides
of
the
building.
The
proposed
development
is
architectural,
II,
interesting
and
aesthetically.
Pleasing
as
a
result
of
the
use
of
variety
of
construction
materials
and
the
servicing
is
from
water.
G
Major
port
demonstrate
that
post
development
drainage
patterns
will
be
consistent
with
pre
development,
drainage
patterns
again
providing
negative
impacts
to
natural
features
and
we'll
have
that
post
development
flow
rate
reduced
by
35%
and
a
proposed
development
also
upholds
the
intent
of
the
Cataraqui
estates.
Business
Park
design
guidelines.
G
G
The
special
zone
is
established,
apologies
the
special
zone
is
proposed
to
establish
the
indoor
storage.
The
permitted
use
and
dye
will
maintain,
in
addition
to
the
inter
story
of
equipment,
the
same
list
of
permitted
uses
and
development
standards
as
the
BP
zone,
so
specification
for
the
applications.
The
lands
are
located
in
a
talent
area
and
within
a
registered
plan
of
subdivision.
The
proposal
promotes
the
efficient
use
and
optimization
of
existing
municipal,
sewage
and
water
services.
Again,
those
post-development
drainage
patterns
will
be
consistent
with
pre
development,
drainage
patterns
and
well.
G
The
post
development
flow
rate
would
reduce
by
35%
it
protects
and
promotes
employment
opportunities.
The
development
addition
of
the
indoor
storage
of
equipment
to
the
permitted
use
is
compatible
with
other
uses
likely
to
occupy
the
Business
Park
industrial
designation
and
the
Cataraqui
States
Business
Park
and
finally,
it's
been
probably
sized
to
call
a
the
use
and
prevent
negative
impacts
now.
Finally,
the
proposed
developments
are
actually
interesting
and
aesthetically
pleasing
and
it
also
promotes
a
prestigious
corporate
image
so
in
support
of
the
applications.
G
A
planning
rationale
and
justification
report
was
submitted,
along
with
our
servicing
and
stormwater
management
report,
tree
inventory,
assessment
and
preservation
plan
a
landscape
plan.
So
in
conclusion,
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
a
2014
provincial
policy
statement.
The
proposal
satisfies
the
intent
of
the
official
plan
and
the
official
plan
amendment
and
rezoning
of
acidic
lands
to
the
business
parks
special
zone
is
appropriate
and
will
meet
the
provision
for
the
bp2
zone.
H
E
It
looks
like
a
very
good
plan
and
a
good
use
of
the
property
I
guess.
My
only
concern
is,
with
the
amount
of
hard
surface
that
you're,
adding
I
know
that
you're
suggesting
that
stormwater
management
will
happen,
naturally
on
the
site,
I'm
wondering
and
if
staff
could
jot
this
down
when
it
comes
time
for
the
site
plan,
would
would
you
consider
using
permeable
pavement
on
the
site
to
to
mitigate
some
of
the
potential
for
for
stormwater.
G
So
through
you,
madam
chair,
and
just
to
clarify
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
was
evident
from
the
the
site
plans
that
were
up
there
there,
the
hard
surface
is
only
up
to
say
the
front
of
the
building
after
it
is,
it
is
a
permeable
surface,
it
will
likely
be
gravel
and
as
for
using
permeable
concrete
on
that
front,
I
don't
know
that
that's
going
to
suffice.
The
cranes
are
very
heavy
large
and
they
may
very
well
tear
it
up.
But
that
is
something
that
we
can.
We
can
certainly
look
into
it's.
I
And
dance
here
for-
and
you
don't
really
have
the
aerial
view
that
you
showed
in
your
slide
deck,
except
maybe
the
slide
that
was
right
before
proposal,
but
we
have
an
aerial
view
in
our
packet
right
there.
Yes,
the
one
on
the
left.
Well,
not
really,
it
doesn't
show
it
quite
the
way
we
have
it
anyway.
When
you
look
at
this
site
on
the
left-hand
side,
which
is
the
west
side,
is
a
stand
of
trees
and
I.
Didn't
ask
for
a
copy
of
the
tree
preservation
plan.
It
looked
like
one
slide
down.
I
A
J
Thank
you
for
presentation.
I'm
totally
in
support
of
the
project
seems
like
a
very
good
use
of
they
can
land
their
industrial
area
application
that
we
haven't
seen
before.
So
that's
good,
very
thorough
work.
There
I
just
have
a
couple
of
small
sessions,
I'm
a
little
surprised
that
there's
nothing
like
this
in
Kingston
before
that.
J
My
second
question
is
again
just
for
the
the
surprise
that
this
hasn't
been
looked
at
seifish
a
planned
purposes
or
what
it
may
be.
There
are
other
industrial
users
who
are
actually
doing
this,
that
we
don't
know
about
who
are
storing,
say
large
pieces
of
machinery
indoors,
and
we
don't
have
an
actual
designation
for
that.
Are
we
sure
you
cannot
answer
that
because
you're
consulting
on
this
project,
but
maybe
a
staff,
might
know
about
that,
then
maybe
we
can
broaden
the
applications
to
a
lawful
out
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
K
More
broadly
so,
specifically,
the
warehousing
component
and
an
outdoor
storage
within
our
business
parks,
subject
to
screening
and
location
outside
of
an
exposed
edge
of
the
property.
So
we
are
trying
to
facilitate
some
of
this
sort
of
development
without
having
to
go
through
this
lengthy
and
expensive
process.
K
G
Yep
three,
madam
chair,
just
to
add
on
this:
isn't
our
clients
first
such
building.
They
have
an
office
in
Belleville,
so
they're
quite
experienced,
and
they
did
search
the
City
of
Kingston
quite
extensively
for
a
piece
of
property
that
would
accommodate
what
they
needed
to
do.
This
seemed
to
fit
the
bill
quite
well.
It's
not
a
use
that
can
be
just
placed
anywhere
to
do
it
size
and
all
the
requirements.
A
G
A
I
will
close
this
public
meeting
and
open
the
regular
planning
meeting
following
it
to
order
and
ask
for
approval
of
the
agenda.
We
do
have
some
correspondence
and
bit
about
the
briefing
moved
by
Councillor
Neil
seconded
by
Councillor
fanuc,
all
those
in
favor.
That's
carried
and
confirmation
of
the
minutes
of
maiden
forth,
moved
by
councillor
Turner
seconded
by
councillor
McLaren.
Any
questions
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor.
Thank
you,
disclosures
of
pecuniary
interest,
none
and
no
delegations,
but
we
do
have
now.
A
This
is
we're
doing
this
with
Bolton
first
yeah,
so
our
first
briefing
is
miss
Bolton
senior,
planner
and
representatives
from
dialogue
will
be
present
to
speak
to
the
committee
regarding
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan,
visioning
report
and
preliminary
market
analysis
and
been
suggested.
This
could
be
15-20
minutes,
but
I
think
we'll
find
it
pretty
interesting.
Thank
you.
L
L
L
So
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan
was
initiated
as
a
response
to
some
community
concerns
with
respect
to
the
proposed
Wellington
tension
extension,
but
also
based
on
the
desire
of
the
community
to
see
the
creation
of
a
vision
and
some
guiding
principles
to
help
direct
and
and
provide
for
growth
in
the
future
prior
to
undertaking
the
technical
studies
that
are
normally
done
with
respect
to
a
secondary
plan.
We
wanted
to
undertake
this
our
space
in
order
to
basically
get
a
sense
from
the
community
what
their
priorities
are
and
what
their
vision
is
for
the
community.
L
What
are
the
things
that
they
love
about?
North,
Kingstown,
that
they
don't
want
to
see
change
and
what
are
some
of
the
things
that
could
or
should
change
for
the
area
in
the
coming
years:
10
20,
30
years,
even
down
the
road,
so
the
objectives
for
the
project.
In
addition
to
creating
that
vision
and
the
planning
principles
to
guide
the
secondary
plan
was
to
look
at
the
existing
conditions
and
identify
any
challenges
and
opportunities
that
might
affect
the
actually
physically
developing
that
area
of
the
city
and
to
then
take
and
analyze
and
test
the
market.
L
Feasibility
of
some
of
the
planning
and
design
opportunities
that
we
heard
from
the
community
so
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
a
vision
that
is
also
realistic
and
something
that
can
be
implemented
for
the
community.
Another
major
objective,
of
course,
was
to
engage
broadly
and
meaningfully
with
the
members
of
the
community
so
that
they
have
the
opportunity
to
have
a
vital
say
in
what
happens
in
this
area
going
forward.
L
A
couple
of
the
other
objectives
were
to
look
at
finalizing
the
actual
secondary
plan
area
boundary,
and
those
of
you
that
have
been
following
the
project
will
see
that
there
was
a
change
to
add
both
the
River
Park
neighborhood
and
the
mcbrady
Park
neighborhood
to
the
to
the
study
area,
so
that
has
been
reflected
in
the
changes
to
the
map.
Another
objective
was
also
to
look
at
the
potential
of
developing
a
new
name
and
identity
for
the
old
industrial
area.
L
Ironically,
that
did
not
turn
out
to
be
a
priority
of
the
community,
so
I
think
you'll
see
in
in
the
report.
The
recommendation
is
for
the
time
being
not
to
address
that
that
you
know
some
people
like
the
name
and
like
it,
the
way
that
it
is
and
and
and
that
may
just
carry
forward
for
a
while
or
it's
something
that
we
can
revisit
in
the
future
for
that
area.
L
M
Thank
You
Sonia
and
thank
you
through
to
the
committee
through
madam
chair,
and
actually
thank
you
as
well
to
a
recognize
a
lot
of
folks
in
in
the
room
who
participated
and
were
fully
engaged
through
this
process
and
and
spent
a
lot
of
hours
in
the
event,
but
also
reading
the
drafts
of
the
document
and
kind
of
providing
feedback
and
comments.
And,
and
so
it's
always
fascinating
to
express
a
year
and
a
half
worth
of
work
in
15
minutes.
But
oh
do
our
best.
M
A
lot
of
our
process
started
with
due
diligence
and
understanding
the
neighborhood
understanding
the
area.
Part
of
that
was
doing
a
full
market
analysis
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
vision
was
a
realistic
vision
that
we
were
trying
to
achieve.
The
types
of
settings
and
objectives
and
absorptions
rate
that
made
sense,
and
some
of
the
outcomes
of
the
market
study
pointed
to
us
to
the
evolving
nature
of
the
area
that
there
was
a
tremendous
legacy
in
history
of
the
type
of
industry
in
Portland
that
were
located
there
and
that
that
continued
to
evolve.
M
Looking
at
the
proximity
to
many
of
the
other
functions
and
trying
to
create
some
synergies,
and
all
of
that
also
trying
to
fill
in
some
of
the
gaps
doing
some
infill
housing,
some
infill
development
right
trying
to
really
look
at
the
existing
context
and
not
reinvent
it,
but
create
that
new
vision
and
started
to
really
read
a
bit.
So
the
redevelopment
of
some
of
the
underutilized
sites
and
underutilized
frontages.
And
ultimately,
it's
also
about
supporting
employment
in
the
old
industrial
area
and
in
the
whole
area.
M
So,
with
a
lot
of
that
due
diligence
and
the
analysis
and
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we
were
hearing
from
the
community,
we
started
by
developing
a
vision
and
we
always
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
started
the
recommendations
having
a
vision
of
where
it
is
that
we're
aiming
for.
And
this
particular
image
I
love,
because
this
was
the
children
participating
in
the
festival.
They
proposed
the
dinosaur
in
the
middle
of
the
neighborhood,
and
we
didn't
follow
through
with
that
one.
But
many
things
that
came
out
were
a
very
important
piece.
M
So
from
there
we
even
started
to
impact
it
further
into
the
principles
which
have
to
do
with
creating
a
welcoming
and
inclusive
setting
within
creating
options
for
movement
for
everybody
in
all
different
forms,
starting
to
think
about.
How
do
we
cluster
and
how
do
we
create
hearts?
And
how
do
we
create
real
centers
of
energy?
How
do
we
think
about
it
from
a
perspective
of
diversity
and
that
being
always
seminal
component
conserving
the
natural
and
cultural
heritage?
M
Huge
part
of
the
conversation-
and
we
certainly
heard
a
lot
about
that
from
the
community,
the
respecting
the
indigenous
traditions
and
the
legacy
in
building
forward.
From
that
we
heard
very
strongly,
and
the
talking
circle
Sonia
referred
to
was
a
big
part
of
that
engagement
as
well
supporting
arts
and
culture
not
just
as
a
character,
but
also
part
of
the
economy,
part
of
the
neighborhood
quality
of
life
and
character
and
all
of
those
pieces,
and
ultimately
also
implementing
sustainability
and
a
real
sense
of
resilience
to
the
growth
in
the
neighborhood.
M
So
we
came
up
with
a
number
of
big
moves
and
these
emerge
through
workshops
and
a
lot
of
folks
rolling
up
their
sleeves
and
entrees
paper
and
getting
some
of
these
ideas
almost
every
event
that
we
had
had
a
conversation
around
supporting
connections,
especially
connections
by
walking
and
in
being
able
to
go
from
one
area
to
the
other,
to
reach
the
water.
So
you'll
see
that
a
lot
of
the
mapping.
A
lot
of
the
conversations
are
about
not
just
establishing
the
places,
but
how
do
you
actually
move
between
them
and
how
do
those
things
happen?
M
Big
part
of
the
conversation
was
about
where's,
the
heart
and
in
fact,
thinking
about
it
as
plural
hearts
and
real
hotspots
and
centers
of
activity,
and
we
knew
that
we
didn't
want
to
spread
that
out
too
thinly.
In
fact,
we
really
wanted
to
focus
so
some
of
the
ideas
was
well.
Maybe
we
can
start
to
think
about
how
the
mix
of
uses,
how
the
early
phases
of
development,
how
the
concentration
of
density
can
really
start
to
foster
this
vision
of
a
walkable
in
supportive
and
complete
community.
M
Another
aspect
was
now
focusing
on
a
new
hub
for
entrepreneurial
ISM,
and
this
was
very
much
focused
around
well
or
it's
already
happening.
There
already
is
an
emerging
sense
of
new
businesses.
Readapting,
existing
structures
and
creating
a
new
character,
and
we
really
wanted
to
foster
and
nurture,
nurture
that
and
take
it
even
a
step.
M
Further
big
part
of
the
conversation
certainly
was
all
the
open
space
and
specifically
Belle
Island,
and
a
lot
of
conversations
around
us
honoring
the
Accord
that
exists
on
that
and
and
wanting
to
support
a
lot
of
the
conversations
that
even
certainly
predates
the
engagement
that
we
were
doing
and
and
how
could
we
support?
All
of
that
exercise.
M
Big
part
of
the
conversation
was
also
acknowledging
that
this
is
not
a
uniform
area.
Not
every
corner
is
painted
by
the
same
brush,
in
fact
they're
quite
different
areas,
and
they
demand
a
slightly
different
way
of
understanding
them,
and
we
can
start
to
almost
think
about
them
as
character
areas
and
each
one
of
them
has
its
unique
qualities,
its
new
unique
identity,
and
it
will
require,
as
we
move
on
to
Phase,
two,
a
real
sense
of
what
are
going
to
be.
M
The
policies
that
need
to
emerge
and
support
that
sense
of
place
for
each
Montreal
and
in-division
are
two
particular
spines
in
this
and
there's
a
real
sense
through
this.
Through
this
exercise
that
they
can
start
to
acquire
a
linear
sense
of
activity
of
animation,
engaging
the
identity
in
the
character,
they
become
a
ways
of
stitching
a
lot
of
things
together.
So
a
lot
of
conversations
were
about.
Well,
how
do
we
actually
do
that?
M
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
actually
capturing
that
that
identifying
the
significant
resources
and
using
them
as
resources,
so
bringing
forward
a
lens
of
cultural,
cultural
heritage
became
a
big
part,
and
it
will
continue
to
be
a
big
part
moving
forward.
Lastly,
is
the
conversation
around
sustainability?
M
So
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
the
secondary
plan
as
it
continues
to
move
forward.
We've
identified
a
number
of
areas
and
we
think
that
we're
at
a
great
stage
in
terms
of
having
the
vision,
the
principles
of
big
moves,
a
real
sense
of
what
is
what
is
desired.
How
can
we
start
to
provide
direction
for
the
next
steps
moving
forward,
which
really
now
start
to
drill
into
the
details?
M
Some
of
the
the
parallel
due
diligence
that
is
going
to
be
informed
and
driven
by
the
vision,
but
also
starting
to
put
some
word
around
the
policy
in
these
types
of
things.
So
we
have
recommendations
for
the
public
realm
for
the
land
views
and
for
the
movement
as
key
frameworks
in
all
of
this.
So
I'll.
Let
Sonia
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
implementation.
L
Thanks
Antonio,
so
this
is
really
just
the
beginning
of
the
story
for
North
Kingstown
in
terms
of
implementation
and
next
step,
we're
going
to
continue
to
do
public
engagement
through
the
next
phase
of
North
Kingstown,
which
is
really
what
we're
setting
up
here
for
and
to
look
at
the
the
technical
component
of
the
secondary
plan.
This
is
where
we're
really
going
to
roll
up
our
sleeves
even
further,
and
we're
going
to
dive
into
those
technical
components
that
are
outlined
in
the
city's
official
plan
that
need
to
be
addressed
for
all
the
secondary
plan
areas.
L
So
that's
looking
at
developing
a
land-use
plan
for
the
area.
It's
going
to
involve
a
transportation
plan
specifically
for
North
Kingstown.
That
will
certainly
include
a
revaluation
of
the
proposed
Wellington
Street
extension.
That
will
be
a
key
component
of
that.
There
will
also
be
a
servicing
plan
to
look
at
other
infrastructure.
L
It
needs
in
the
community,
as
well
as
a
financial
and
implementation
plan
which,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
is
going
to
speak
to
perhaps
the
municipal
initiatives
that
can
be
done
in
terms
of
Public,
Works
or
capital
projects
to
improve
the
area,
and
they
have
to
speak
to
phasing
of
how
that
might
occur.
It
may
also
look
at
ways
in
which
the
city
could
incentivize
or
encourage
the
types
of
development
that
we
want
to
see
for
the
North
Kingstown
area.
L
We
currently
have
a
brownfields
Community
Improvement
Plan
that
offers
sort
of
tax
tax
increment
based
financing,
which
is
great,
so
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
build
on
that
for
other
things.
There
is
also
there
was
the
recommendation
through
this
first
phase
that
North
Kingstown
has
such
a
rich
cultural
history
that
there
really
should
be
a
cultural
heritage
study,
specifically
for
North
Kingstown.
So
that
is
something
that
was
not
part
of
the
original
scope
and
budget
of
the
project.
But
it's
certainly
something
that
you
know.
L
We've
heard
and
we've
taken
to
heart
as
staff
and
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
that
and
figuring
out
how
best
that
that
will
dovetail
and
fit
with
all
the
other
components
that
we've
outlined
for
the
secondary
plan.
So
we're
going
to
be
addressing
that
in
more
detail
in
the
terms
of
reference
for
phase
2,
which
we
will
be
presenting
to
Council
in
the
near
future.
Of
course,
one
this
first
phase
wraps
up
NZ.
L
The
visioning
report
is
accepted
by
council,
eventually
that
and
and
really
that
visioning
report
is
going
to
be
sort
of
our
linchpin
in
our
test
point
for
all
of
the
work
moving
ahead,
we'll
be
testing
the
vision
and
the
planning
principles,
the
design
directions
against
what
it
was.
The
community
told
us
and
really
seeing
what
worked
through
the
technical
studies
to
try
and
bring
that
vision
to
fruition.
So
at
this
point,
we're
certainly
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
committee
would
have
and
happy
to
do
so.
A
N
Don't
have
to
do
that:
okay,
Mary
for
our
one
last
arm
unit,
83
and
really
I,
feel
as
though
I'm
here
as
a
cheerleader
on
a
number
of
accounts.
First
of
all,
I
would
like
to
congratulate
the
nominations.
Committee
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
you
are
on
it,
but
this
is
the
absolute
best
working
group
I've
ever
been
on,
and
it
was
just
really
an
amazing
and
wonderful
group
of
people.
N
Secondly,
congratulations
to
antonio
and
dialogue,
for
you
know
a
wonderful
public
outreach
in
the
early
stages
and
especially
to
Sonya
and
Greg,
who
did
the
most
awesome
job
ever
of
really
coordinating
all
of
the
public
input
and
going
through
the
the
drafts,
and
you
know,
pains
taking
long
work,
but
you
know
really
stellar
just
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you.
J
I
think
you
Medicare
so
I'm
going
to
also
be
offering
a
lot
of
praise
for
work.
That's
been
done
so
far.
I
wasn't
on
the
working
group,
but
I
did
take
part
and
quit
a
few
of
the
sessions
and
I
put
some
of
my
ideas
in
for
consideration.
So
I
think
the
visioning
and
the
outreach
is
very
innovative.
Mein
different
methods
were
used
and
you
managed
to
attract
small
leading
men
large
gatherings,
so
that's
very
good
and
I
think
that
the
the
project
improves
substantially
as
it
went
along.
J
But
the
second
draft
is
a
big
step
forward
compared
to
the
first
draft
so
very
pleased
to
see
that
and
all
there's
been
a
lot
of
hard
work
going
into
it
and
I
think
staffs
also
done
very
well
in
keeping
in
touch
with
those
who
signed
up
and
giving
us
updates
as
to
what
the
next
steps
were.
So
that
was
excellent,
very
pleased
about
that.
J
J
So
this
is
with
respect
to
the
innovation
husband
and
it
made
us
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
interesting
innovation
happening
right
around
the
area
in
the
one
mill
and
those
buildings
near
there,
and
then
what
I
saw
on
some
of
the
earlier
maps
don't
see
here.
So
much
was
that
you
were
game
planning
some
new
streets
into
the
Daevas
tannery
area
right.
You
have
some
streets
that
have
been
there
for
100
or
more
years
just
self-abuse
generate
and
the
neatest
tanneries
are
problematic
and
just
for
the
diffuse
industrial
site.
J
So
there
has
been
a
lot
of
environmental
studies
done
on
and
they
are
yet
public
I
was
on
the
ballpark
working
group
in
2014
and
we
got
a
half
hour
briefing
from
the
scientist
and
engineer
who
had
carried
out
that
work
and
as
I
understand
it.
The
environmental
study
is
still
being
peer,
reviewed
by
Parks
Canada,
which
is
Food
Nation
were
working
up.
So
that's
a
look
at
the
sort
of
the
mystery
in
a
black
box
therapies.
We
don't
really
know.
J
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
and
I
have
been
on
the
case
a
little
bit
on
this
trying
to
get
that
material
brought
into
the
public
realm.
I
think
council
needs
to
see
it
because
we
are
calling
ourselves
Canada's,
most
sustainable
city,
and
that
is
our
largest
sized
brownfield
and
probably
the
most
challenging
one
to
clean
up
and
it's
right
in
the
middle
of
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan
area.
So
it's
a
challenge.
J
That's
going
to
be
with
us
for
a
lot
of
years
and
I
would
just
advocate
that
council
take
a
position
of
trying
to
obtain
that
material
in
some
way
or
other,
so
that
the
the
the
consultants
and
the
working
group
and
I
guess
the
community
as
well,
can
get
around
to
discussing
this
because
Vincent
false
starts
on
that
property
going
forward
and
the
waterfront
master
plan
envisions
a
trail
going
along
the
water's
edge
there,
which
is
in
land.
That's
now
cools
off
due
to
pass
industrial
pollution.
So
just
wanted
to
highlight
that.
Thank
you.
A
A
Okay,
we
do
have
a
recommendation
that
the
visioning
analysis
report
and
preliminary
market
analysis
for
phase
one
of
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan
be
accepted
by
council
and
fulfillment
of
the
city's
contract,
with
dialogue
and
staff
proceed
with
the
terms
of
reference
for
Phase,
two
of
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan,
and
that
the
terms
of
reference
for
Phase,
two
of
the
North
Kingstown
secondary
plan,
be
presented
to
Council
for
the
summer
of
2017,
moved
by
councillor
Neill
seconded
by
Councillor
Oh
Sanok.
Any
other
comments,
councillor
Neill.
E
Just
a
quick
comment:
I
think
it's
an
excellent
report
and
I
guess
my
only
cautionary
tale
is
the
secondary
studies
are
often
excellent.
The
Williamsville
one
was
a
really
good
example
of
it,
as
this
one
is
of
a
good
secondary
study,
it's
what
we
do
with
it
through
zoning
and
how
we
do
an
implementation
of
it
afterwards
to
achieve
some
of
those
goals
that
are
reflected
in
that
community
input.
So
I
really
really
applaud
this
so
far
and
I
look
forward
to
it
being
properly
implemented.
E
E
A
A
1276,
Bracken,
wood,
Crescent
and
this
is
a
recommendation-
counts
to
counsel
that
the
application
for
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
on
behalf
of
Aaron
Wylie
and
Steve
Patterson
for
the
property
known
as
1276
Bratton
would
Crescent
be
approved.
Do
I
have
a
mover
and
a
seconder
moved
by
Councillor
Turner
seconded
by
Councillor
Roseanna.
Any
questions
I
will
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
and
that's
Carrie,
thank
you
and,
as
per
our
addendum
planner,
mr
CBO
will
speak
to
us
regarding
the
pendant
and
committing
housing
review.
O
Hello
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
planning,
committee
staff
and
members
of
the
public,
my
name
is
anne-marie
Eusebio
and
I
will
be
presenting
the
pending
and
committed
housing
review.
We're
going
to
take
a
look
at
an
inventory
of
housing
supply,
which
is
an
inventory
of
our
Planning
and
Development
applications.
Both
the
pending
and
committed
a
summary
of
our
building
permit
demand,
which
is
a
look
at
our
building
permit
activity
from
a
10-year
period,
also
looking
at
average
average
demand,
and
this
takes
us
to
an
analysis
of
our
lifespan.
O
O
So
when
we
look
at
housing
supply,
we
look
at
our
pending
and
development
applications,
so
our
committed
applications
would
be
our
registered
plans
of
subdivisions
that
have
been
approved.
Our
approved
site
plans,
as
well
as
our
draft
approved
subdivisions,
and
then
we
look
at
our
pending
applications,
which
are
those
applications
that
are
in
review,
which
include
our
site,
plans,
zoning
bylaw
amendments
and
secondary
plans.
O
So
the
summary
is
that
our
commited
units,
again
considering
the
approved
applications,
are
three
thousand
two
hundred
and
forty
seven.
And
if
we
look
at
the
pending
units
consisting
of
the
plant
of
subdivisions
that
are
currently
being
reviewed,
our
site
plans.
Our
zoning
bylaw
amendments
and
our
secondary
plans
we're
looking
at
the
pending
unit,
total
of
five
thousand
seven
hundred
and
sixty
six.
So
we
do
have
a
grand
total
of
all
pending
and
committed
units
of
nine
thousand
and
thirteen
units
would
which
will
them
eventually
come
to
markets.
O
So
this
is
a
map
showing
locations
of
where
the
pending
and
committed
are
located,
and
you
can
see
over
in
the
West,
and
we
see
that
Cataraqui
West
secondary
plan
comprising
of
the
Woodhaven
subdivisions.
You
also
see
the
Westbrook
Meadows
Subdivision
further
down
on
the
west.
We
see
Midland
Park
and
we
see
a
category
north
on
our
East
End.
We
see
a
Greenwood
Park
West
and
we
also
see
Baxter
north
and
again
further
west.
O
We
see
a
the
Gardner's
Road,
the
700
Gardner's
Road,
which
is
currently
sitting
at
101
thousand
one
one
thousand
eighteen
units
that
are
proposed
number
51
at
the
bottom.
That
says:
750
King,
Street
West,
that's
around
five
hundred
and
forty
nine
units,
and
then
we
also
see
our
downtown
area
comprising
of
our
two
to
three
princess
Street,
the
capital
project,
three
to
seven
University,
the
princess
street
in
Chatham
project,
all
comprising
of
a
total
proposing
accounts
of
a
little
over
six
hundred.
O
So
this
is
what
we're
looking
at
in
terms
of
our
pending
and
committed
unit
counts
and
inventory.
As
of
2016,
when
we
look
at
housing,
demand
we're
looking
at
our
building
permit
activity.
So
we
not
just
looked
at
our
numbers
for
2016,
but
we
also
looked
at
a
ten
year
period
and
from
that
sum
we
looked
at
average
annual
demand,
and
this
map
is
very
similar
to
the
map
that
you've
seen
before.
But
it
actually
shows
where
development
is
happening
as
of
2016.
O
So
very
similarly,
we
see
as
the
cataract
we
North
Woodhaven
westbrook
meadows
happening
further
to
the
west.
We
see
the
multi-phase
subdivisions
in
the
east
for
Greenland
Park,
West
and
Baxter
north,
and
then
we
also
see
some
multiple-unit
developments
further
in
the
downtown
area,
comprising
mostly
of
a
multi-unit
family
dwellings.
In
terms
of
proportions,
61%
were
single-family
dwellings,
21
s
or
a
2%
were
sending
and
27%
were
townhouses
and
10%
were
multiples,
so
this
is
showing
added
welding
unit
construction
by
geographic
area.
O
So
we
looked
at
the
central
east
and
west
portions
of
the
city,
so
we
took
the
numbers
from
a
2007
and
then
we're
looking
to
the
end
here
at
2016
and
it
shows
a
proportion
of
where
the
development
is
happening.
So,
as
you
can
see
from
the
pie
chart
here,
56
percent
of
residential
growth
is
happening
in
the
West,
and
then
we
have
22
percent
respectively
for
the
east
and
central
portions
of
the
city.
O
O
If
we
look
at
our
singles
shown
in
red,
we
could
see
that
we
are
experiencing
a
downward
trend
in
the
construction
of
singles
and
then
we
also
see
multiples
having
a
more
upward
trend,
more
pronounced
between
2010
to
2016,
and
we
also
see
some
rise
in
a
number
of
row
houses
being
constructed.
If
we
talk
about
our
2006
numbers,
the
total
building
permit
unit
count
was
277,
which
is
not
that
much
in
comparison
to
our
previous
years.
O
In
2016
we
were
at
around
500
units
and
in
2016
we
were
looking
at
around
again
277
about
twenty.
Nine
of
them
were
multiples,
so
it's
just
to
demonstrate
the
cyclical
nature
of
building
construction
within
our
city.
People
may
choose
to
live
in
multiples
because
they
wish
to
downsize
or
want
to
be
close
to
amenities.
O
O
So
we've
looked
at
the
housing
supply,
which
is
our
planning
or
sorry
our
pending
and
committed
applications,
and
then
we
looked
at
our
housing
demand,
which
is
our
building
permit
activity
and
our
trend,
and
all
of
that
comes
together
to
determine
what
the
lifespan
is.
So
what
is
lifespan
lifespan
is
the
measure
of
the
total
annual
supply
divided
by
the
annual
demand,
and
it's
the
assumed
length
of
time
it
would
take
for
approved
units
to
be
consumed
by
the
market.
So
I've
mentioned
before
we
consider
our
pending
are
committed
units,
those
that
are
shovel-ready.
O
So
those
are
the
units
that
have
been
approved,
they're
ready
for
building
permit
issuance
and
those
are
our
registered
plans
of
subdivision,
approved
site
plans.
We're
looking
at
our
committed
units
again,
which
is
a
second
sort
of
like
a
second
category,
we're
looking
at
draft
plans
of
subdivisions
that
may
take
maybe
one
or
two
years
to
be
available
to
the
market
and
again
we
are
also
looking
at
are
pending
units
being
the
units
that
are
still
in
review
as
part
of
our
applications
and
have
yet
to
receive
planning
approval.
O
So
this
is
what
we're
looking
at
in
terms
of
life
spent
if
we're
taking
committed
units
that
are
shovel,
ready
and
ready
to
go
for
building
permit
issuance.
So
what
we've
done
is
that
we've
categorized
the
community
committed
units
into
dwelling
unit
type.
So,
for
example,
if
you
look
at
our
singles,
the
total
units
is
510,
and
then
we
take
the
average
annual
demand
taken
from
our
building
permit
information
in
order
to
come
up
with
a
year
supply.
O
So
if
we
add
all
of
these
units
totals
together,
we
come
up
with
a
total
of
695
divided
by
the
annual
demand,
which
altogether
is
596,
and
we
come
up
with
a
1.1
six
year
supply.
So
if
we
measure
that
against
the
provincial
policy
statement
in
the
beginning
of
this
presentation,
we
need
to
have
a
three
year
supply
in
order
to
accommodate
for
a
residential
growth
now
from
these
numbers
from
our
shovel
ready
units,
we're
not
exactly
there
yet,
but
if
we
look
at
our
committed
units
which
are
pending
final
approval.
O
O
This
is
what
our
we
are
looking
at
in
terms
of
the
units
the
totals
and
the
average
annual
demand.
So
what
pops
out
here
really
is
our
semi-detached
and
we're
sitting
at
the
moment
at
a
forty
one
point,
eight
year
supply
the
total
of
seven
hundred.
Fifty
three
for
semis
is
coming
from
our
Cataraqui
West
secondary
plan.
O
These
are
numbers
in
which
we
determine
life
span,
but
it
is
important
to
consider
that
there
are
assumptions
that
need
to
take
place
here
and
that
the
first
one
is
that
all
units
have
to
be
available
immediately.
The
second
one
is
that
there's
no
preference
for
unit
type-
and
the
third
is
that
the
rate
of
permit
issuance
remains
consistent
with
the
current
10-year
average.
E
Just
very
quickly,
I
I
was
quite
surprised
that
2016
number
for
Central
District
was
over
only
29,
but
perhaps
somebody
could
reflect
on
the
OMB
appeals
that
are
now
going
on
along
the
princess
Street
corridor
in
particular,
and
the
brock
street
development,
and
also
would
630
princess
have
been
captured
in
this
number.
I
know:
they've
dug
the
foundation,
but
they
were
still
working
on
on
the
site
plan
agreement.
Is
that
still
where
it's
at
so?
K
Three-Member
chairs
so
university
suites,
so
the
number
29
that
you
see
I
believe
you're
referring
to
that
table.
That's
the
indication
of
building
permits
issued
so
university
suites,
as
everyone
knows,
was
held
up
at
the
board
and
didn't
come
to
market.
It
was
over
200
units
and
the
Capitol
Theater,
similarly,
is
at
the
board.
It's
reflected
in
the
pending
and
committed
supply
of
units
that
we
anticipate
coming
down
the
pipeline.
But
it's
not
reflected
in
these
numbers
as
having
been
built.
Similarly
with
brock
street
and
and
the
other
one
you
mentioned,
637.
D
O
Through
you
and
madam
chair
last
year's
numbers
are
worth
were
fairly
close
with
regard
to
the
pending
and
sorry
the
committed
units.
We
were
saying
that
it
was
a
five
point.
Four
year
supply
last
year
was
sitting
around
six.
It's
fifteen
point,
one
years
for
the
pending
and
committed
last
year.
It
was
very
close.
It
was
a
little
higher
at
16.
O
D
K
Remember
if
I
might
just
add
so
low
the
penne
tomato
last
year
is
Emery
mentioned
was
what
it
was.
It's
coming
down.
The
lifespan
has
declined
by
the
eight
months,
so
what
that
means
is
that
we
haven't
provided
the
same
amount
of
supply
to
meet
the
demand
over
the
past
year,
so
the
lifespan
has
gotten
a
little
less
than
it
was
in
the
last
presentation.
This
report,
okay,.
E
P
You
and
through
you,
madam
chair
I,
have
a
question
about
the
growth
in
the
West
End
I
like
to
see
growth.
That's
great,
but
I'm
just
concerned
about
traffic.
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
address
this,
or
this
might
not
be
part
of
the
scope,
but
it
makes
me
a
little
nervous.
We
just
took
away
Elaine
on
Bath
Road
and
look
at
all
this
projected
growth,
so
I
just
like
that
to
be
thrown
in
the
notes
somewhere.
The
minutes
that
we're
going
to
have
all
these
subdivisions
out
here.
K
Your
manager,
I,
can
I
can
offer
a
response
that
you'd
like
so
the
majority
growth
in
the
West
is
occurring
within
our
cat
West
secondary,
planned
area
in
the
cat
north
area
as
well,
well,
actually
yeah.
So
those
areas
are
the
result
of
very
detailed
technical
studies
that
we're
looking
at
how
to
manage
the
traffic
flows
that
would
result
from
full
build-out.
So
those
particular
projects
can
be
accommodated
with
the
road
network
that
we
have.
The
bath
Road
context
is
a
little
different.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
didn't
have
the
value
of
the
piece
of
paper
so
bear
with
me
here
when
you
showed
the
pie
chart
of
the
division
of
different
types
of
housing
which
would
semies
and
townhouses
and
singles
I
believe
yeah.
Here
we
are
in
central
area.
Sorry,
that's
better!
That's
exactly
what
I
was
hiding
so
does
that
division
over
time
demonstrate
intensification
and
it's
sold
by.
How
much
can
you
answer
that
question?
F
Not
necessarily
not
expecting
actually
be
able
to
answer
the
last
bit,
but
perhaps
you
have
a
notion
about
how
that
division
is
working
in
terms
of
intensification
in
the
city
in
general,
because
I
notice,
for
instance,
there's
a
lot
of
semies
there
way
more
than
apparently
we're
supposed
to
need,
but
somebody
must
think
they
can
sell
them.
So
that's
sort
of
a
follow
up,
but
first
question
is:
does
it
demonstrate
intensification
three-member.
K
The
answers
depends
on
what
you
consider
intensification,
so
we
haven't
distinguished
in
these
numbers,
the
difference
between
say
greenfield
development,
which
is
our
cat,
Westcott
North,
Greenwood,
Park
Baxter
north
from
what's
happening
in
the
already
built
out
areas
in
cities.
So
no,
if
that,
if
you're
thinking
what
the
intensity
of
the
change
in
those
built
out
areas
versus
the
green
fields,
we
haven't
distinguished
that
here.
Q
If
I'm
chair,
if
I,
can
just
add
to
that
council
Rochester
if
you're
referring
to
this
or
thinking
in
terms
of
the
single
family
homes
versus
multi,
residential,
which
we
would
see
typically
in
higher
density
areas,
so
if
you
look
at
the
trend,
I
would
say
that,
yes,
we
are
seeing
most
more
of
these
multi
residential.
The
red
ones.
Q
Obviously,
are
the
single
family
units
so
you've
you
see
across
there
over
the
years
decrease,
but
in
terms
of
the
multi,
multiple
residential,
there
are
a
couple
of
years,
especially
2016,
where
it's
very
but
keep
in
mind
that
a
number
of
the
projects
or
proposal
that
council
has
approved
or
endorsed
are
at
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
So,
for
example,
if
University
Suites
and
actually
gone
ahead
and
been
built,
those
numbers
in
terms
of
the
the
blue
line,
there
would
be
much
higher
for
some
of
those
years.
So
you
would
see
that
intensity
go
up.
Yeah.
R
Madam
chair,
thank
you
and
through
you,
so
just
to
back
it
up
for
more
of
a
principle,
standpoint
I
to
answer
your
question
about
intensification,
I
would
say
yes
absolutely
and
the
reason
that
I
would
say
that
is
that
we
have
an
urban
boundary.
It
was
reconfirmed
in
2014,
so
any
new
building
that
we
see
within
that
urban
boundary
from
a
planning
perspective
would
be
considered
intensification,
so
we're
intensifying
the
use
of
the
land.
That's
within
the
area
that
we've
defined
for
our
urban
growth
plan.
R
Now,
there's
different
interpretations
and
I
think
that
is
what
Greg
was
referring
to
is
what
do
you
mean
by
intensification
and
I
think
in
Kingston?
What
we've
chosen
to
mean
by
it
is
that
it's
an
overall
intensification
throughout
the
city
with
certain
areas
identified
to
take
more
of
that
intense
use,
but
that
we
want
to
see
it
through
secondary
Suites
mix
of
housing
uses.
So
it's
not
just
single
families,
its
townhouses
mixed
in
with
semies
mixed
in
with
the
single-family
home
secondary
Suites,
small
apartment
buildings,
so
I
would
say
generally.
R
F
You
I
was
starting
off
from,
and
thank
you
to,
commissioner
riddle
with
the
motion.
We've
been
told
that
singles
have
been
falling
and
that
is
demonstrated
there
and
I
just
wanted
some
idea,
which
I
believe
page
and
then
was
demonstrated
over
here.
So
I'm
happy
with
the
answer.
I
think
I'm
supposed
to
know
the
answer.
This
question
so
bear
with
me.
F
R
So
the
olds
were
all
numbers.
If
you
look
from
2007
on
we
we
had
in
the
mid
2000s.
We
had
some
pretty
big
years
where
we
were
pulling
six
seven
hundred
permits
a
year
and
a
lot
of
those
would
have
been
single-family
homes.
So
I
would
say,
I.
Think
2016
for
us
was
a
bit
of
an
anomaly
year.
I
think
we
did
see
a
smaller
amount
of
housing
starts,
but
I
think
sometimes
the
market
compensates
for
that,
and
what
we're
seeing
so
far
in
2017
is
we're
at
almost
70
percent
of
our
revenue.
R
F
K
Three
madam
chair
I,
think
as
Paige
mentioned,
the
rebound
is
somewhat
the
result
of
a
bad
having
a
bad
year,
so
you
can
see
on
the
slide
there
at
the
bottom,
the
total.
That's
the
total
number
of
units
we've
constructed
annually
for
the
past
ten
plus
years.
So
2016
was
by
comparison
a
bad
year
and
if
the
University
of
Suites
project
alone
had
been
constructed
last
year,
as
we
thought
it
might,
it
would
have
added
200
plus
units
to
that
total.
Bringing
us
closer
to
what
we
see
is
the
annual
average.
K
R
Just
one
more
quick
comment:
I
think
to
what
we're
seeing
with
some
of
the
excellent
foreign
investment
that
we've
seen
come
to
the
city
over
the
last
year.
We
definitely
have
new
residents
that
are
going
to
be
coming
to
Kingston
as
part
of
supporting
those
large
employment
uses,
and
we
have
seen
a
bit
of
a
bump
in
the
housing
market.
I
think
because
of
that
with
added
interest
in
the
Kingston
community,
with
new
people
relocating
here.
A
Thank
you
thanks.
I
have
a
question
in
terms
of
the
census:
I
gather
Kingston
is
growing
slower
than
we
thought
it
was,
but
there's
still
a
great
demand.
So
would
that
sort
of
and
I
doubt
we
contract
it,
but
I
presume
that
students
coming
to
town
and
families
as
the
children
get
older
children
buy
a
house
there's.
Those
are
the
some
of
the
reasons
that
we
still
seem
to
be
growing,
but
our
population
isn't
expanding
quickly.
I
was.
K
Really
hoping
through
madam
chair
that
we
would
get
a
question
on
the
census,
so
thank
you.
We
are
very
conscientious
of
the
of
the
numbers
and
the
impact
that
they
have
on
decision-making.
I
will
say
the
2016
census
numbers
like
comparison
to
2011
our
little
misleading.
The
2011
numbers
were
not
very
reliable.
It
was
the
year
that
we
did
a
voluntary
census.
So
I
was
at
a
forum
of
planners
last
week
and
we
had
dr.
K
Peter
Kirkham,
who
was
a
long-term
employee
of
Statistics
Canada,
gave
a
presentation
and
he
really
sort
of
made
the
claim
that
we
have
to
not
rely
on
the
2016.
So
what
I
would
suggest?
Is
you
look
at
the
comparison
between
2016
and
2006
and
it's
not
as
dramatic
ax,
a
small
increase
as
the
difference
between
2011
2016
appears,
but
the
census
says
you
probably
know
didn't
pick
up
students.
It
was
done
in
May
when
the
majority
of
our
students
are
outside
the
city.
K
I
really
question
if
it
picks
up
a
good
majority
of
CSV
Kingston,
because
a
lot
of
people
would
report
their
permanent
address
elsewhere.
So
we
are
in
the
works
right
now.
We
are
doing
some
population
analysis.
The
2013
population
projection
was
somewhat
relying
on
the
2011
numbers
and,
like
I
say
they
they
have
some
question
abilities.
So
we
are
looking
at
some
of
those
underlying
factors
to
population
growth,
we're
not
seeing
it
in
the
market,
we're
not
seeing
a
decline
in
the
market,
but
we
want
to
better
understand
the
population.
There
are
some
missing
pieces.
K
A
Great,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
from
the
committee
seeing
none?
Thank
you
very
much.
That
was
a
report
for
information
purposes.
Oh
that's,
okay!
Thank
you
and-
and
that
concludes
the
business
portion
of
our
meeting.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
presentation.
We
have
no
emotions,
no
notices
of
motions,
no
other
business.
We
received
a
piece
of
Correspondence
regarding
King
Street
West
next
meeting
is
June.
The
8th
and
I
gather.