►
Description
Planning meeting from April 20, 2018. For the full meeting agenda visit http://bit.ly/2ztqyEQ
A
So
we'll
begin
saying
that
we're
all
present
we'll
begin
the
evening
with
a
public
meeting
pursuant
to
the
Planning
Act
on
294
Rideau
Street
I'll
read
the
notice
of
collection,
personal
information
collected
as
a
result
of
this
personal
hearing
and
on
the
forms
provided
at
the
back
of
the
room,
is
collected
under
the
authority
of
the
Planning
Act
and
will
be
used
to
assist
in
making
a
decision
on
this
matter.
All
names
addresses
opinions
and
comments
may
be
collected
and
may
form
part
of
the
minutes
which
will
be
available
to
the
public.
A
Questions
regarding
the
collection
should
be
forwarded
to
the
Director
of
Planning
and
Development.
The
purpose
of
public
meetings
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
public
forum,
as
required
by
the
Planning
Act
following
presentations
by
the
applicant
committee.
Members
will
be
afforded
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
for
clarification
or
further
information.
The
meeting
will
then
be
open
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions.
Interested
persons
are
requested
to
give
their
name
and
address
for
recording
in
the
minutes.
There
is
also
a
sign-in
sheet
for
interested
members
of
the
public
at
the
back
of
the
room.
A
No
decisions
are
made
at
public
meetings
concerning
applications
unless
otherwise
noted
the
public
meeting
is
held
to
gather
public
opinion.
An
exception
to
this
rule
is
combined
reports
which
consolidates
the
public
meeting
and
comprehensive
reports.
These
applications
are
deemed
by
staff
as
straightforward
and
routine.
The
business
practice
has
been
in
place
for
a
number
of
years
and
is
received
by
the
applicants
as
efficient
customer
service
and
effective
use
of
committee
time.
Please
note
that
staff
used
its
discretion
in
determining
if
an
application
can
be
combined
public
meeting
comprehensive
report
to
expedite
the
approval
process.
A
Public
meeting
reports
are
provided
to
inform
the
public
of
all
relevant
information.
Information
gathered
is
then
referred
back
to
planning
and
development
staff
for
the
preparation
of
a
comprehensive
excuse.
Me
report
and
recommendations
planning
committee.
This
means
that
after
the
meeting
tonight,
staff
will
be
considering
the
comments
made
by
the
public
in
their
further
review
of
the
applications.
When
this
review
is
completed,
a
report
will
be
prepared
making
a
recommendation
for
action
to
this
committee.
The
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
A
B
You
and
good
evening
my
name
is
Yuko
LeClair
I'm,
a
land
use
planner
with
pho,
10
and
I'm
here
to
present
an
application
for
zoning,
bylaw
amendment
and
294
Ryo
Street
on
behalf
of
Jorden
McGregor.
The
purpose
of
this
application
is
to
facilitate
a
severance,
so
the
existing
property
would
be
severed
and
divided
into
two
and
each
property
would
be
developed
with
a
single
attached
dwelling
and
a
secondary
suite
in
the
basement.
B
So
I'll
start
by
speaking
a
little
bit
about
the
context
of
the
area
and
I'm
gonna
try
and
use
my
mouse.
My
ability
here
it's
a
little
hand
up
there.
So
the
subject
site
is
in
the
Inner
Harbor
neighborhood
at
the
northwest
corner
of
James
and
Rito
streets.
It's
a
generally
residential
area,
but
there
is
a
bit
of
a
mix.
The
immediate
vicinity
around
the
site
is
residential
with
building
heights
of
one
to
two
and
a
half
stories.
B
Although
there
are
a
few
three-story
buildings
in
the
area
and
I'll
show
you
a
couple
in
a
moment,
there's
also
quite
a
range
of
uses
in
a
walking
distance
and
in
a
slightly
longer
walking
distance
to
the
subject
site.
So
a
Cataraqui
street
just
at
the
corner,
there's
a
veterinary
clinic,
it's
in
commercial
use,
they're
moving
eastward
on
Cataraqui
Street.
B
There
are
quite
a
few
more
commercial
uses
that
woolen
mill
west
on
Cataraqui
Street,
there's
another
retail
use
and
then
on
Montreal
Street
on
the
west,
just
two
blocks
over
there's
quite
a
few,
whereas
residential
uses,
but
commercial
uses
community
facilities
and
services
moving
north
on
Montreal
Street
north
of
Magoffin
park.
There
are
some
industrial
and
employment
uses
as
well,
and
this
is
also
an
area
with
a
lot
of
open
space.
B
There's
two
parks
you
can
see
just
shown
up
on
to
the
north
of
the
site:
baseball
diamonds-
there's
also
Keaton's
Park
up
here,
just
to
the
north
doug
flora
park
down
here
and
there's
another
park
to
the
south,
just
across
marito
crest,
called
Riverview
Park.
So
there's
active
the
combination
of
active
and
passive
parks
in
the
area
moving
a
little
bit
closer
to
the
subject
site.
B
There
is
currently
a
one-and-a-half
story
house
on
the
property
detached
dwelling
I
think
it
might
actually
just
be
one
story
and
there's
no
fair,
Lee
large
detached
garage,
and
this
is
where
I'll
start
talking
a
little
bit
more
about
the
the
neighborhood
character
and
the
buildings
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
So
I
mentioned
that
there's
some
three
stories.
B
There
aren't
a
lot
but
there's
a
fairly
substantial
three
story:
apartment
building
right
down
here,
just
to
the
southeast
of
the
site,
on
orito
Street
and
then
on
Cataraqui
Street,
just
down
the
way,
a
bit
there's
a
three-story
rear
addition
to
a
house,
but
generally
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
subject.
Property
and
I'll
show
you
some
examples:
the
houses
are
singles
and
semies
wanted
to
do
one
to
two
and
a
half
stories
so
just
to
the
west
of
the
site
on
James
Street,
there's
a
2-story
and
then
a
one-story.
B
That's
the
image
to
the
on
the
top
image.
The
bottom
is
just
across
the
street
on
James
Street,
again
one
and
two-story
houses,
there's
a
duplex,
that's
kind
of
tucked
in
behind
the
tree
a
little
further
west.
On
the
other
side,
a
reto
Street
again
a
mix
of
one
and
two-story
dwellings,
residential
single
detached
for
the
most
part,
but
just
to
the
north
of
the
site.
There's
a
semi
detached
dwelling,
it's
a
two-story
house
and
it's
also
zoned
to
allow
a
group
home
use-
and
this
is
that
apartment
building.
B
I
was
talking
about
earlier
that
three-story,
so
I'm.
Really
what
I'm
trying
to
get
across
here
is
that
this
is
an
area
with
diverse
mix
of
built
forms.
The
lot
fabric
is
also
quite
diverse,
tore
some
fairly
small
lots
and
there's
some
fairly
large
lots
and
those
kind
of
everything
in
between
a
lot,
a
variety,
a
lot
of
different
build
forms
and
densities.
So
what's
proposed
for
the
site.
So
this
image
here
is
kind
of
trying
to
highlight
the
different
uses
on
the
property
on
the
proposed
properties.
B
Rather,
so
each
lot
would
be
about
262
square
meters
in
area.
They
would
have
equal
frontages
of
about
fifteen
point,
seven
meters
on
James
Street.
It
would
also
both
be
accessed
from
James
Street
if
I
can
use
my
mouse
again
here.
So
the
idea
here
would
be
to
allow
tandem
parking
to
make
the
most
efficient
use
of
the
site
side
by
side
parking
just
isn't
going
to
work
the
sites
just
not
large
enough
to
allow
that,
but
it
does,
it
can
accommodate
two
parking
spaces
in
a
tandem
configuration.
B
The
the
primary
unit
would
be
accessed
from
this
front,
porch
access
from
James
Street
and
would
have
access
to
some
amenity
area
in
some
balconies
and
I'll.
Explain
those
in
a
moment
before
I
get
to
that,
though,
the
secondary
suite
would
also
be
accessed
from
James
Street
and
you
know,
walk
out.
They
kind
of
a
wocket
feature
that
would
the
door
of
which
would
be
underneath
the
front
porch
and
that
secondary
suite
would
would
have
a
walk
out
access
to
the
to
this
rear,
dedicated
patio
area
kind
of
showed
in
this
beige
color.
B
So
I've
been
referring
to
this
as
a
two
and
a
half
storey
building.
It
would
be
a
two
and
a
half
story
with
a
raised
basement
so
that
it
wouldn't
be
a
cellar.
There
would
be
some
adequate
roof
space
for
that
basement
unit
in
particular,
and
that
would
also
allow
this
walkout
function
and
this
rear
yard
patio
space,
which
would
be
a
dedicated
amenity
area
for
the
the
basement
suite.
B
The
main
unit
would
have
a
balcony
on
the
main
floor,
which
would
be
approximately
the
same
area
as
the
patio,
almost
exactly
the
same
area,
and
then
on
the
second
floor.
There
would
be
another
balcony,
a
little
bit
smaller
a
little
bit
shallower
that
would
provide
a
little
bit
more
amenity
area
and
have
both
balconies
would
have
privacy
screening
too,
about
five
feet
in
height
to
minimize
the
overlook
on
neighbors,
and
vice
versa.
We'll
have
some
privacy
for
the
users
of
the
balconies.
B
Just
a
couple
of
renderings
of
the
building
you
can
see:
I,
don't
know
how
clearly
it
is
up
here,
but
how
the
walkout
entries
would
work,
so
there
would
be
windows
facing
onto
the
street
and
that
the
unit
would
be
accessed
from
underneath
the
porch
here.
The
main
unit
would
have
access
over
here
and
then
the
other
unit,
so
the
Lots
would
effectively
be
mirrored
the
way
that
the
houses
are
proposed
to
be
built
moving
on
a
little
bit
of
the
policy
framework.
Here
this
is
a
property.
B
That's
in
a
housing
district
housing
districts
are
generally
proposed
or
generally
intended
to
remain
stable,
but
accommodate
some
degree
of
infill
and
intensification.
There
is
a
goal
in
the
Official
Plan
that
40%
of
new
residential
development
occur
through
intensification,
and
this,
in
type
of
intensification,
that's
compatible,
is,
is
in
line
with
that.
The
designation,
the
land
use
designation
for
the
property
is
residential.
It
allows
a
broad
range
of
residential
uses,
including
single
detached
dwellings
and
secondary
Suites.
B
Again
in
her
concurrence,
intensification
I
want
to
note
that
the
Official
Plan
land
use
designation
outside
of
secondary
plan,
so
in
most
of
the
city,
doesn't
really
differentiate
between
low
medium
and
high
density.
It
provides
a
broad
residential
density
and
then
provides
criteria
for
where
a
medium
and
higher
density
uses
are
appropriate.
This
property
and
his
proposed
development
crosses
that
threshold
into
medium
density
and
the
built
form
of
a
secondary
suite
is
also
contemplated
in
the
Official
Plan
as
a
medium
density,
and
it
meets
tests
for
a
medium
density
usage.
B
Why
it's
an
appropriate
use
in
this
location.
Speaking
on
the
zoning,
the
subject
site
is
in
the
zoning
bylaw
84
99.
That's
the
old
city
bylaw,
it's
zoned,
a
which
is
a
one
in
two
family
dwelling
zone.
It's
a
fairly
broad
zone
that
allow
a
single
detached
dwellings
semi-detached
in
duplexes,
but
it
doesn't
explicitly
allow
secondary
Suites.
B
So
the
intention
here
would
be
to
allow
a
single
detached
dwelling
and
to
allow
a
secondary
suite
as
a
specific
use
and
the
the
important
difference
between
a
secondary
suite,
a
single
detached
dwelling
and
with
a
secondary
suite
and
a
duplex.
Is
that
a
secondary
suite
has
some
limitations
that
are
imposed
through
city's
secondary
suite
guidelines,
so
a
secondary
suite
has
to
be
90
square
metres,
an
area
or
smaller,
and
it
can't
be
more
than
40%
of
the
area
of
the
main
unit.
So
in
that
way
it
restricts
the
intensity
of
that
residential
use.
B
B
There's
a
number
of
front
and
rear
yard
setbacks
that
can't
be
met
by
the
proposal,
and
the
idea
here
is
that
by
having
the
property
the
house
a
little
bit
closer
to
the
road,
it
allows
a
little
bit
more
rear
yard
amenity
space
by
allowing
some
relief
in
the
yard
projections
of
the
balconies
that
allows
those
balconies
to
provide
more
amenity
area.
The
tenant
parking
I
spoke
about
that
a
little
bit
earlier.
That's
really
a
functionality
site
in
a
way
of
amusing,
the
site.
B
More
efficiently
and
providing
that
parking
option
for
further
property,
this
is
also
a
situation
where
there's
a
bit
of
a
technicality.
The
lot
is
currently
a
corner
lot
and,
as
a
result
of
the
future
severance
one
of
the
Lots
will
remain
a
corner
lot.
Zoning
bylaw
is
a
little
bit
inconsistent
in
the
way
that
it
deals
with
corner
Lots.
So
the
this
amendment
would
normalize
the
way
that
the
lot
the
setbacks
are
proposed
for
the
property
and
would
also
incorporate
a
site
triangle
for
safety.
B
So
the
engineering
department
has
asked
that
a
site
triangle
be
incorporated
in
the
zoning
for
the
corner
lot
and
that
would
be
reflected
in
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
so
to
wrap
up.
This
is
a
proposal.
That's
consistent
with
the
PPS,
the
provincial
policy
statement.
I
conforms
to
the
strategic
direction
and
the
Official
Plan
so
direction
on
intensification,
but
also
on
the
functional
needs
and
compatibility.
It's
consistent
with
the
Official
Plan
designation,
its
secondary
suites,
are
also
a
form
of
affordable
housing.
So
this
contributes
to
that
supply
for
the
city.
It's
an
amendment.
B
C
You
mr.
chair,
the
notice
of
the
the
application
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act,
with
two
signs
posted
on
both
the
frontages
of
the
property
20
days
in
advance
of
the
meeting
and
notices
sent
by
mail,
282
properties
within
120
metres
and
to
date,
there's
been
no
written
comments
or
phone
or
counter
inquiries.
So.
A
A
A
Okay,
we'll
move
to
the
public,
any
public
comments,
seeing
none,
B
I'll
ask
for
a
mover
and
a
set
that
isn't
happening
on
this
file.
So
I
do
have
another
question.
Sorry,
it's
been
a
long
day
already
the
tandem
parking
I'm,
always
a
little
troubled
by
the
idea
of
tandem
parking
and
how
difficult
that
is
operationally.
A
B
Chair
and
a
secondary
suite
as
a
per
tick
is
a
is
a
situation,
that's
more
amenable
to
tandem
parking,
because
the
idea
is
that
one
of
the
people
residing
there
is
the
owner
and
the
other
is
a
tenant.
So
they
have
a
kind
of
a
relationship,
lease
lessee
relationship.
So
there's
an
opportunity
there
between
the
landowner
and
the
tenant
to
work
out
how
they'll
make
the
tandem
parking
situation
work.
A
Just
a
quick
comment
for
some
of
the
relief
that
you've
been
asking
about.
I
know
that
neighborhood
fairly
well,
because
my
daughter
owns
a
home
just
down
the
road
on
orito.
There
aren't
a
lot
of
uniform
if
I,
remember,
rightly
uniform
kind
of
front
yard.
Setbacks
like
there
is
in
suburbia,
so
so
that,
if
I
recall,
rightly
the
side
yard
and
the
front
yard
relief
on
the
setback.
There
are
examples
along
the
street
where
those
are
indeed
the
the
common
condition
in
that
neighborhood.
Is
that
accurate.
B
Again
three
mr.
chair,
the
idea
of
the
proposed
front
yard
setback
is
that
in
this
case
it's
consistent
with
what
is
found
in
the
area.
So
the
property
immediately
to
the
west
is
a
little
bit
closer
to
the
front
lot
line
than
the
proposed
development
and
then
the
property
that's
further
west
from
that
one
is
a
little
further.
So
there's
some
variation
in
the
distances
between
houses
and
front
lock
lines
in
this
case
it
the
proposal.
A
B
Right
so
the
amenity
area,
the
landscaped
open
space.
This
is
not
a
site
that
triggers
the
18
and
a
half
square
metre
requirement.
It's
not
a
sufficiently
higher
density
development
to
a
lot
to
require
that,
but
it
does
have
a
30%
landscape,
the
open
space
requirement,
and
that
is
met
by
the
proposal.
Great.
A
And
thank
you
my
final
comment
and
it's
a
plan
related
I,
guess:
I
set
that
up
by
saying
we
can
ask
site
planning
questions.
Can
you
go
back
to
the
picture
that
showed
the
rendering
of
the
proposal?
Yeah?
Is
that
that
great
is
that
that
kind
of
gray
siding
board
that
more
and
more
developers
are
using,
or
is
that
just
a
rendering?
This.
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
Those
wishing
to
provide
oral
comments
at
this
meeting
will
be
invited
to
do
so
if
a
person
or
public
body
would
otherwise,
heaven
would
otherwise
have
an
ability
to
appeal
the
decision
of
the
Council
of
the
corporation
of
the
City
of
Kingston
through
the
Local
Planning
Appeal
Tribunal,
but
the
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
oral
submissions
at
the
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
to
the
City
of
Kingston
before
the
bylaws
passed.
The
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
The
decision.
Thank
you.
A
So
actually,
both
a
and
B
are
reference
to
the
same
comprehensive
report
and
the
first
was
for
information
purposes.
Only
are
there
any
questions
from
the
or
comments
from
the
committee?
Oh
okay,
I
just
got
a
nudge
that
staff
would
like
to
speak
to
this.
If
you
would,
that
would
be
great.
Thank
you.
E
Good
evening
mr.
chair
planning,
committee
staff
and
members
of
the
public,
this
is
absorbing
bylaw
amendment
application
for
143
Beverly's
streets
permit
a
second
unit.
A
public
meeting
was
held
on
March
20
seconds,
and
the
committee
deferred
the
comprehensive
report
and
recommendations,
so
that
staff
would
have
the
opportunity
to
review
the
public
comments
received
at
the
meeting
and
provide
a
response.
A
supplementary
report
has
been
prepared
for
your
consideration.
E
E
With
regards
to
the
location
of
the
subject
property.
It
is
located
within
the
all
Lincoln
neighborhood
of
the
city
and
is
located
south
of
Union
streets
on
the
east
side
of
Beverly
Street.
With
regards
to
the
surrounding
area,
it
should
be
noted
that
there
are
two
units
dwellings
along
Beverly
Street,
as
noted
in
the
yellow
stars.
As
you
see
in
the
image
before
you
as
well,
there
are
triplexes
in
the
surrounding
area
as
well
along
Union
streets
and
Beverly
Street.
E
At
the
corner,
in
the
south,
the
South
west
corner
with
regards
to
the
site
itself,
this
is
a
photo
of
143
Beverly
Street.
It
is
two
and
a
half
story,
dwelling
it's
a
single
family
dwelling
and
a
building
permit
was
issued
for
renovations
for
the
single-family
dwelling
only
and
also
with
regards
to
the
rear
addition
again.
This
is
just
for
the
single-family
dwelling
only
and
not
for
the
second
unit.
E
This
is
a
photo
showing
the
rear
of
the
subject
property.
There
is
an
existing
elevated
deck
on
the
property
and,
right
now
as
it
stands,
there
is
overlooked
or
overlooked
as
a
result
of
this
deck.
The
rear
addition
improve
the
situation
in
terms
of
privacy
and
I'll
shows.
It
also
should
be
noted
that
there
is
an
adjacent
residence
on
the
property
as
well,
and
the
rear
adesh
rare
addition
to
this
location
at
1:43,
a
Beverly
Street,
is
scaled
back
further
from
there.
E
This
shows
the
site
plan
of
the
property
further,
showing
the
proposal
as
seen
on
this
plan,
the
rear
addition
is
slightly
smaller
in
scale
than
the
adjacent
residence.
With
regards
to
the
proposal,
it
should
be
noted
that
there's
also
two
parking
spaces
at
the
rear,
which
will
be
one
for
the
main
unit
and
one
for
the
second
unit,
and
this
is
a
photo
showing
this
existing
streetscape
along
Beverly
Street.
E
The
provincial
policy
statement
outlines
matters
of
provincial
interests
with
regards
to
land-use
planning,
so
the
sections
that
are
applicable
to
this
application
are
the
following
to
accommodate
an
appropriate
range
and
mix
of
residential
uses,
which
include
second
units,
affordable
housing
and
housing
for
older
persons.
Also,
land-use
patterns
within
settlement
areas
shall
be
based
on
densities
and
a
mix
of
land
uses
which
are
appropriate
for
and
efficiently
use
the
infrastructure
and
public
service
facilities
which
are
planned
or
available
and
avoid
the
need
for
unjustified
eran,
economical
expansion.
E
The
subject
property
is
located
within
their
residential
designation
within
the
Official
Plan,
which
permits
single
detached
semies,
triplexes
and
apartments.
Official
plan
also
notes
adverse
effects.
With
regards
to
proposed
develop
with
regards
to
shadowing
for
this
developments,
the
rear
addition
will
not
cause
any
shadowing
effects
with
regards
to
the
loss
of
privacy.
The
situation
will
be
improved
with
the
loss
of
the
deck
and
they
include
in
the
inclusion
of
the
new
rear
addition.
E
There
will
be
no
no
issues
in
terms
of
noise
order,
dust
or
vibration
until
after
construction
has
been
completed,
it'll
be
no
increased
or
uncomfortable
wind
speed,
and
there
will
be
no
issues
with
respect
to
environmental
degradation.
With
regards
to
the
level
of
traffic,
there
are
transits
spots
about
three
of
them,
along
Union,
Street
and
with
regard
to
diminish
servicing
levels
because
of
social
or
physical
infrastructure
necessary
to
support
a
user
area.
A
stormwater
management
brief
and
also
a
grading
plan,
was
submitted
through
the
Technical
Review.
E
There
were
no
issues
in
terms
of
stormwater
management
or
or
grading
or
drainage,
with
respect
to
the
ability
enjoy
a
property
or
normal
amenity
associated
with
the
proposed
development.
With
regards
to
safety
and
access
from
the
site
plan,
it
does
show
appropriate
parking.
There
is
sufficient
amenity
space
for
this
proposed
development,
and
each
unit
will
be
self-contained
with
kitchen
amenity
space
indoors
and
appropriate
number
of
bedrooms.
E
With
regards
to
in
visual
intrusion
that
disrupts
the
streetscape
building
or
cultural
heritage
resource,
the
rear
addition
will
not
cause
any
adverse
impact
with
regards
to
the
character
of
the
existing
streetscape
along
Beverly
Street.
With
regard
to
architectural,
compelled
incompatibility
in
terms
of
scale
style
massing
in
color,
the
rear
edition
will
be
compatible
with
the
existing
two-and-a-half
story.
Stucco
building
with
regards
to
significant
views,
our
cultural
heritage
resources,
there
will
be
no
impact
as
a
result
of
this
proposed
development.
E
With
regard
to
the
zoning
bylaw,
eight
four,
nine
nine-
that
project
property
is
located
within
the
a
zone
which
permits
one
family
in
to
family
dwellings,
and
this
is
a
list
of
the
zoning
provisions.
So
for
this
development
there
is
only
one
performance
standard
that
the
applicant
is
seeking
relief
from,
and
that
is
the
minimum
lot
area.
E
370
square
metres
is
required
per
dwelling
unit
for
a
total
of
seven
hundred
and
forty
square
meters.
The
proposal
is
sitting
at
482
square
meters
and
it's
in
deficient
of
its
deficient
of
two
hundred
and
fifty
eight
square
meters,
so
with
regards
to
minimum
society,
side,
yard,
minimum
rear
yard
maximum
lot
coverage
maximum
building
height,
as
well
as
maximum
building
residential
building,
depth,
maximum
floor
space
index
landscape,
holding
this
open
space,
residential
parking
and
parking
area.
All
of
these
provisions
of
zoning
bylaw,
eight
four,
nine
nine
of
the
a
zone
will
be
upheld.
E
So
again,
this
is
the
proposed
developments.
We
have
the
rear
addition
at
the
back.
The
second
unit
will
be
accessed
from
the
fronts
and
the
menu
and
it
will
also
be
accessed
from
the
front
of
Beverly
Street
as
well.
There
are
two
parking
space
at
the
back
and
there
is
a
hammerhead
space
located
there
as
well,
which
will
allow
for
safe
access
parking
cars
to
and
getting
out
of
the
subject
property.
E
This
is
showing
the
main
floor
so
right
now
the
existing
dwelling
has
seven
bedrooms,
so
it
will
be
a
total
of
ten
bedrooms
for
the
entire
building.
For
the
main
floor.
There
are
four
bedrooms
and
for
the
second
floor
and
the
third
floor,
there
will
be
three
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor
and
on
the
third
floor
there
will
be
two
bedrooms,
so
the
public
comments
that
we've
received
they
are
listed
here
with
regards
to
land
use
some
compatibility.
The
proposed
developments
is
reasonable
and
moderate
and
scale
with
respect
to
compatibility
and
the
surrounding
area.
E
As
noted
in
my
previous
slides,
there
are
two
family
dwellings
along
Beverly,
Street
and
triplexes
along
Union
Street.
The
one-story
addition
will
not
impact
the
streetscape
and
the
proposed
rear
addition
will
not
result
in
intrusive
outlook.
Overlook
that
the
current
debt
currently
provides.
The
applicant
has
provided
confirmation
that
garbage
storage
and
bicycle
storage
will
be
located
at
the
rear
of
the
dwelling
and
will
be
covered
and
from
a
land-use
planning
perspective,
we
cannot
demonstrate
on
the
type
of
resident
that
will
live
in
the
dwelling
and
with
regards
to
concerns
for
rooming
houses.
E
A
A
Seeing
none
we'll
go
back
to
the
committee
and
I
will
just
comment
quickly.
The
district
councillor
councillor
shroud
yesterday
did
submit
to
council
a
petition
with
37
names
opposed
to
this
development
and
that
is
on
file
and
can
be
made
available
through
the
clerk's.
So
any
further
questions
or
comments
is
there
a
mover?
Is
there
a
shaker,
Thank
You
councillor
Turner
councillor
of
sanik,
any
further
comments
or
questions?