►
From YouTube: Kingston Ontario - Planning Committee - June 7, 2018
Description
Planning Committee meeting from June 7, 2018. For the full meeting agenda visit http://bit.ly/2MfwCmu
A
A
All
names
addresses
opinions
and
comments
may
be
collected
and
may
form
part
of
the
minutes
which
will
be
available
to
the
public
questions
regarding
this
collection
should
be
forwarded
to
the
Director
of
Planning
and
Development.
The
purpose
of
public
meetings
is
to
present
planning
applications
in
a
public
forum,
as
required
by
the
Planning
Act
following
presentations
by
the
applicant
committee.
Members
will
be
afforded
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
for
clarification
or
further
information.
A
The
meeting
will
then
be
open
to
the
public
for
comments
and
questions
interested
persons,
I
requested
to
give
their
name
and
address
for
recording
in
the
minutes.
There's
also
a
sign-in
sheet
for
interested
members
of
the
public
in
the
back
of
the
room.
No
decisions
are
made
at
public
meetings
concerning
applications.
Unless
otherwise
noted
the
public
meeting
is
held
to
gather
public
opinion.
An
exception
to
this
rule
is
combined
reports
which
consolidates
the
public
meeting
and
comprehensive
reports.
These
applications
are
deemed
by
staff
as
straightforward
and
routine.
A
The
business
practice
has
been
in
place
for
a
number
of
years
and
is
received
by
the
applicants
as
efficient
customer
service
and
effective
use
of
committee
time.
Please
note
that
staff
use
discretion
determining
if
an
application
can
be
a
combined
public
meeting
comprehensive
report
to
expedite
the
approval
process.
A
Public
meeting
reports
are
provided
to
inform
the
public
of
all
relevant
information.
Information
gathered
is
then
referred
back
to
planning
and
development
staff
for
the
preparation
of
a
comprehensive
report
and
recommendation
to
the
planning
committee.
This
means
that
after
the
meeting
tonight,
staff
will
be
considering
the
comments
made
by
the
public
in
their
further
review
of
the
applications.
A
I'm
sorry
lost
my
place
to
this
committee.
The
recommendation
is
typically
to
approve
with
conditions
or
to
deny.
This
committee
then
makes
it
up
recommendation
on
the
applications
to
City
Council
City
Council
has
the
final
say
on
applications
from
the
city
perspective
following
Council
decisions
notice
will
be
circulated
in
accordance
with
the
Planning
Act.
If
a
person
or
a
public
body
would
otherwise
have
an
ability
to
appeal.
A
The
decision
of
the
council,
the
corporation
of
the
city
of
Kingston,
to
the
local
planning,
Appeal
Tribunal,
but
the
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
aural
submissions
at
a
public
meeting
or
make
written
submissions
to
City
the
City
of
Kingston
before
the
bylaw
has
passed.
The
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
The
decision
will
move
on
to
our
first
and
only
public
meeting
held
tonight.
Number
12
2016
agenda,
its
file,
number
d,
1401
for
2018,
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
the
former
st.
Mary's
on
the
lake
hospital.
B
B
So
many
of
you
will
know
the
property,
it's
the
former
st.
Mary's
of
the
Lake
Hospital,
and
you
can
see
from
the
map
on
the
screen
that
this
is
a
a
property
that's
very
centrally
located
between
both
of
Queens
campuses,
the
Maine
and
the
West
Campus.
It
is
within
a
largely
residential
neighborhood.
Some
of
the
immediate
uses
close
to
the
former
hospital
include
st.
John's,
home
Bellevue,
House
and
sorry
I,
said:
st.
John's,
Sir
John,
a
McDonald's
former
house,
the
Isabel
Bader
Center
and
there's
also
a
synagogue
close
to
the
neighborhood.
B
This
is
an
area,
that's
well
serviced
by
public
transit
in
terms
of
the
property
itself.
It's
a
five
hectare
property
which
is
slightly
more
than
twelve
acres
of
land
and,
as
you
can
see,
it
has
frontage
on
a
number
of
streets.
It's
a
through
lot,
with
its
primary
frontage
being
on
King
Street,
its
main
entrance
and
a
really
a
full
block
on
Union
Street,
and
it
also
has
frontage
on
both
on
eller
back
as
well.
The
existing
building
is
one
to
three
storeys
in
height
and,
but
is
probably
most
well
known
about.
B
So,
what's
before
this
committee
tonight
is
a
proposal
for
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
the
purpose
would
be
to
allow
the
university
to
use
the
site.
It
would
also
be
to
allow
medical
clinics
and
medical
uses
and
it
would
be
to
reduce
the
parking
stall
size,
but
in
terms
of
the
buildings,
there's
no
proposal
to
change
any
of
the
setbacks.
B
Within
the
Official
Plan,
because
this
was
a
property
that
had
long
being
a
hospital,
it's
designated
as
an
institutional
use
and
the
institutional
designation
allows
a
wide
range
of
uses,
including
schools
and
hospitals,
military
penitentiaries.
So,
with
respect
to
the
official
plan,
the
proposal
for
the
university
to
use
this
building
is
within
the
allowable
designation.
B
The
way
kingston's
owns
its
institutional
properties
is
largely
with
three
ways:
there's
an
ease
own,
an
e-1
zone
and
an
e-2
zone.
The
a
zone
is
a
mix
own
that
allows
both
hospital
and
university
type
uses,
and
it
provides
geographic
areas
where
setbacks
and
Heights
are
permitted
and
then
separately.
There's
an
e1
zone
which
is
really
a
largely
a
Queen's
University
zone
and
e2
has
largely
been
used
as
a
hospital
zone.
So
with
the
two
distinctions.
B
The
property
exists
today,
but
this
is
a
bylaw
that
would
permit
the
university
use,
permit
the
clinic
use
the
medical
use
and
it
would
alter
the
size
of
the
parking
stalls
to
match
the.
What
I
would
call
the
more
standard
size
is
being
used
in
the
city,
so
that
just
shows
you
kind
of
the
uses
in
zoning
bylaw
language,
universities,
colleges,
medical
clinics
and
then
the
dimensions
of
the
stall
size.
B
From
a
broad
perspective,
this
application
meets
the
provincial
policy
statement
and
the
intent
of
the
opie,
and
so
while
this
is
a
redesignate
to
permit
a
range
of
uses
to
the
site,
it's
being
done
without
altering
any
of
the
the
setback
provisions.
So
the
zoning
bylaw
to
deal
with
the
parking
is
really
to
allow
for
a
more
efficient,
efficient
configuration
of
the
existing
parking
areas.
B
Now
before
we
move
into
the
questions
I,
just
one
one
point
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
committee's
attention
was
that
and
it's
part
of
the
public
correspondence
package.
That's
that's.
At
the
back
of
the
room
today,
Queen's
University
held
its
own
meeting
on-site
that
was
advertised
on
may
9th,
and
the
meeting
was
held
on
may
22nd
and
that
meeting
was
held
in
the
lobby
of
the
the
former
hospital
where
we
met
with
with
neighbors
to
discuss
interests
and
concerns,
and
just
just
to
kind
of
summarize
some
of
the
interests
for
the
committee.
B
B
There
was
questions
regarding
the
Heritage
status
of
the
building,
and
you
know
there
was
a
general
desire
for
people
to
discuss
how
the
parking
may
be
used
regarding
whether
public
would
actually
have
the
opportunity
to
use
it,
and
you
know
those
are
kind
of
some
of
the
general
close
to
zoning
site
planned
comments,
and
we
had
a
good
discussion
about
those
those
items
and
I'm
sure
some
of
those
will
come
up
so
I'm
pleased
to
answer
any
questions.
The
committee
may
have.
A
C
Good
evening,
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
Planning
Act,
a
notice
of
public
meeting
was
provided
in
the
form
of
signs
posted
on
the
subject
properties
20
days
in
advance
of
the
public
meeting.
In
addition,
notices
were
sent
by
mail
to
all
350
property
owners
within
120
metres
of
the
subject
site.
No
courtesy
notice
was
also
placed
in
the
Kingston
winix
standard
and
two
phone
calls
and
one
piece
of
correspondence
has
been
received
and
is
it
included
in
the
addendum.
Thank
you.
D
B
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
that
area
will
be
entirely
maintained.
There
are
no
changes
proposed
at
this
time.
Queens
is
intending
to
move
its
administrative
function
into
the
building.
Anything
beyond
that
will
be
a
master
plan
exercise
that
would
involve
the
community,
so
the
grass
is
staying.
The
parking
lot
dimensions
are
staying,
the
trees
are
staying,
it
will
see,
it
will
stay
on
the
outside.
As
you
see
it
today,
great.
D
And
just
question
about
the
parking
480
spots
really
just
to
service
on
the
University
staff
that
will
be
moving
into
st.
Mary's
or
will
also
staff
or
students
be
able
to
park
there
and
you
don't
pay
for
their
permit
parking
and
then
use
it
on
the
main
campus.
If
that's
where
they
have
to
go.
That
was
also
a
question
that
I
heard
this
week.
Certainly.
B
D
A
Thank
you
and
I
just
want
to
thank
Queens
for
the
public
meeting.
I
did
have
an
opportunity
to
attend
and
there
were
many
interesting
questions
and
answers.
Thank
you.
So
now
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
public
and
give
people
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions.
You
have
up
to
five
minutes
just
give
your
name
and
residential
address.
If
you
would.
E
A
E
That's
fine
that
that's
one
question
and
around
that
question
it
concerns
the
traffic
on
both
King
and
Union.
Street
King
Street,
as
everyone
here
knows,
is
horrendously
busy
the
week
standard
report
of
that
in
an
editorial
letter.
Today,
it's
very
very
busy
if
I
see
traffic
coming
off
of
King
Street
going
into
Saint
Mary's
I
see
that
as
an
additional
burden
on
the
traffic
load
on
King
I
also
see
that
additional
burden
on
Union
Street,
so
you've
answered
my
my
main
main
question,
which
was
how
many
spaces
were
you
gonna
provide
Knight
is
480,
correct.
E
Presently
we
only
have
this
is
gonna,
be
very
short.
Presently
we
only
have
two
parts
in
Sydenham
Ward
West
to
the
main
campus,
one
of
which
residents
are
eagerly
looking
forward
to
in
the
spring
water
park,
and
that
is
again
if
we
can
safely
access
it
through
the
maze
of
traffic
and
the
other
is
at
the
opposite.
End
of
CID
noir
at
West,
Oak,
Ridge,
Park
well,
Queens
be
looking
out
for
the
local
community's
interests,
as
well
as
their
own
and
I'm.
Talking
specifically
about
the
green
space
that
exists
right
now.
E
My
major
concern
is
how
well
green
space
be
maintained
on
this
site
and
in
fact,
how
could
it
be
increased
to
serve
the
needs
of
the
local
community?
I
was
hoping
quite
frankly
that
a
developer
would
have
purchased
this
property,
and
then
the
city
could
have
extracted
concessions
from
the
developer
in
the
form
of
a
park
or
similar
green
space
project
for
the
local
residents
and
might
might
I
add
students
as
well.
E
F
F
Looking
at
a
number
of
heritage
files
that
have
come
through
that
committee
generally
accepted
as
anything
over
40
years
can
be
considered
for
a
heritage,
designation
or
discussion.
So
I'd
like
to
push
a
question
on
the
record
as
to
whether
there's
been
any
work
done
on
that
particular
aspect.
Certainly
the
facade
that
faces
King
Street,
sorry
attractive.
It's
very
well
designed
on
stone
and
I.
Don't
know
the
building
that
well,
but
they're,
probably
of
interesting
other
heritage
features
in
there,
along
with
some
more
water
features.
So
that's
my
first
question.
F
F
The
increase
that
we're
going
to
be
seeing
is
the
reduction
in
parking
lots,
side,
parking,
space,
size
gets
approved
and
Asthma
final
question
is
I'm
wondering
under
this
application,
whether
there
could
potentially
be
a
new
residential
use
with
the
property.
Now
it
was
used
as
a
hospital
there
could
potentially
be
you
know.
Student
residents
face
put
in
there.
F
A
G
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Roland.
Billings
live
at
31l,
we're
back
street.
First,
a
couple
things
I
appreciate,
Queens,
taking
the
time
to
meet
with
us
at
st.
Mary's
the
lake
a
couple
weeks
ago,
that
was
that
was
very
informative
and
good
opportunity
and
this
opportunity
as
well
one
clarification
point
before
I
get
to
the
question.
The
orphanage
part
of
the
hospital
was
built
in
1908,
so
you
a
little
bit
better
than
your
40
years
there.
G
The
clinic's
part
is
another
thing
to
applaud
you
for
if
that
does
happen,
anybody
that
has
had
to
try
to
get
someone
in
and
out
of
the
clinics
that
are
currently
housed
that
hotel
dieu,
certainly
the
opportunity
to
have
the
parking.
The
accessibility
at
st.
Mary's
is
a
plus
biggest
concern
that
I
have-
and
this
is
the
question
you
mentioned
at
the
meeting-
that
we
had
at
st.
G
Mary's-
that
your
master
plan
is
coming
up
in
the
next
couple
of
years,
and
what
I
would
ask
is
that
that
future
consideration,
the
consultation
with
the
neighborhood,
is
important
for
us
on
that
front
as
well.
I
know
you
answered
the
question
at
that
time
about
residents
and
that
that
wouldn't
be
practical
for
the
model
that
you're
currently
using
in
Queens,
but
certainly
that's
something
that,
as
a
residential
area,
we
would
certainly
have
some
concern
about.
G
So
the
question
would
be:
is
Queens
going
to
be
looking
for
neighborhood
consultation
as
you
look
forward
for
your
master,
planned
activity
in
2019
and
beyond,
and
certainly
the
use
of
the
area
for
parking
for
the
Bader
Center?
If
that
could
be
publicized
with
the
Bader
Center?
That
would
be
nice
because,
certainly,
as
you
know
me,
but
it's
attended
anything
at
the
Bader
Center
elder
back
Street
seems
to
be
the
primary
place
to
park,
so
it
should
be
getting
that
were
to
help
all
of
us.
Thank
you.
A
H
A
B
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I'll
start
I'll
start
with
the
parking
space
number
question.
First
of
all,
because
the
number
480
got
thrown
around
and
I'm
not
gonna
throw
councillor
Sanok
under
the
bus,
but
that
was
a
number
she
asked
me
was
480.
The
number
of
parking
spaces
is
420,
the
reduction
of
stall
size
by
10
centimeters,
which
is
like
the
width
of
my
hand,
I,
have
to
say
I
can't
imagine
that
we
would
get
60
more
spaces
even
as
large
as
this
site
is
maybe
10
or
15
extra
spaces.
B
So
just
for
a
hundred
percent
clarity
there
are
420
spaces
on
the
site.
We
haven't
actually
draw
drawn
up
what
it
might
look
like
with
the
lines
repainted,
but
it
certainly
I
can't
imagine
that's
60
more
spaces
would
be
possible
on
this
site.
So
I
just
want
to
point
that
clarity
out
right
away
with
respect
to
access
ingress,
egress
fire
accesses
at
this
point
in
time
there
is
no
plan
to
make
changes
to
the
way
the
site
operates.
B
I
mean
Queens
going
through
any
exercises
of
changing
those
things
would
get
picked
up
by
a
site
plan
control
application.
If
there
were
changes
to
entrances,
that
would
pick
that
up
totally
respect
the
comment
regarding
the
need
for
green
space
in
this
area,
and
it's
a
note
that
you
know
Queens
representatives
are
here
in
this
room.
I
know
they're
taking
notes
and
I'm
taking
notes.
B
So
it's
a
it's
a
comment
that
we
can
certainly
use
and
apply
in
the
master
plan
process
the
recommends
about
heritage
and
and
at
the
present
time,
as
was
pointed
out,
the
building
is
was
actually
built
over
a
number
of
years.
The
earliest
parts
pre-1910
I,
believe
there
was
an
edition
in
1920
and
then
nineteen
fifty
and
then
1970
is
kind
of
the
latest
Hospital
edition.
So,
as
mr.
Dixon
pointed
out,
anything
over
40
years
has
the
potential
to
be
examined
from
a
heritage
perspective.
B
There
was
a
question
with
respect
to,
could
the
property
be
used
for
residential
use
and
and
yes
it
could
be?
You
know
there
is
the
potential.
However,
one
of
the
points
that
was
made
very
clear
at
the
meeting
we
had
on
May
22nd
was
that
you
know
from
from
a
logistic
standpoint
kind
of
like
how
we
have
zoning
rules.
Queens
has
its
own
rules
regarding
where
its
residences
can
be,
and
this
location
is
outside
of
the
walking
distance
from
either
the
West
Campus
or
the
main
campus
to
qualify.
As
you
know,
a
dorm
use.
B
B
All
that
would
be
a
part
of
that
Master
Plan
process
that
if
the
earliest
will
start
in
2019,
so
the
the
immediate
use
of
the
building
is
for
administrative
purposes.
So,
if
you
think
in
in
simplest
terms,
if
the
school
is
academic
and
it's
administrative,
so
academic
is
running
the
programs
they
need
to
be
on
main
campus
while
administration
is,
is
everything
from
new
projects
to
building
maintenance?
That's
what
will
operate
out
of
this
site
in
some
capacity
and
certainly
because
of
the
former
hospital
use?
B
B
B
So
through
you,
mr.
chair
I,
said
at
the
beginning
that
at
the
present
time,
there's
no
plan
to
change
like
the
entrances
and
accesses
and
fire
lanes.
So
so
the
current
plan
would
stay,
as
is
there's
no
plan
to
change
that
right
now,
and
what
I
also
noted
was
that
if
there
were
changes
to
the
lane
and
the
way
it
accessed
either
king
or
union,
if
those
moved
at
all
those
would
be
site
plan
applications
that
would
be
required.
Okay,.
I
A
Thank
thank
you.
Seeing
no
further
questions
or
comments.
I'll
bring
this
public
meeting
to
a
close
thanks.
Everybody
we'll
move
on
to
our
regular
agenda.
The
regular
planning
meeting
number
12,
2018
I'll,
call
this
meeting
to
order.
Looking
for
approval
of
the
agenda.
Councilor
sonic
councillor
Turner,
all
those
in
favor
carried
conformation
of
minutes
that
the
minutes
of
planning
committee,
meeting
number
11,
2018
held
Thursday
May
17th
be
approved
any
comments
or
questions
no
councillor
Turner
councillor
Sanok,
all
those
in
favor
carried.
A
Saroo
Bashaw,
thank
you.
I
should
have
asked
that
question
sooner
I
apologize
will
be.
The
land
development
manager
will
be
four
as
present
and
speak
to
the
committee
regarding
the
highest
and
best
land
use
study
for
Kingston,
Norman,
Rogers
Airport
final
report.
The
floor
is
yours.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
H
All
right
thanks
very
much
mr.
chair,
I'm,
just
gonna
kick
things
off
just
quickly
before
I
turn
things
over
to
ciruit
to
to
give
a
briefing
on
the
report.
A
few
years
back,
the
airport
management
team
came
to
us
looking
for
help
on
where
to
take
this
study.
So
we
were
happy
to
apply
our
experience
that
we
have
in-house
developing
our
business
parks
and
in
in
selling
our
Lots
in
our
in
our
city,
owned
business
parks,
and
we
we
wanted
to
take
that
knowledge
that
we
know
about
servicing
zoning.
H
And,
of
course,
we
have
a
solid
base
of
business
already
at
the
airport
and
their
tenants
of
the
city,
and
we
knew
that
we
wanted
to
to
work
with
those
stakeholders
to
find
out.
Where
can
we
take
the
the
airport
further?
Who
would
be
interested
in
investing
and,
of
course,
there's
a
lot
of
land
at
the
airport,
so
we're
best
to
focus
efforts
on
services
on
marketing
to
to
take
advantage
of
a
lot
of
space,
and
where
does
it
make
sense
to
leave
things
alone?
So
a
lot
of
good
research?
H
A
lot
of
detail-
that's
true,
we'll
just
touch
on
tonight,
because
it
is
a
lengthy
report
in
your
package,
but
we're
this
is.
This
is
a
first
step
in
that
process
for
for
staff
and
council
to
to
accept
this
report
so
that
we
can
get
to
the
next
stages
which
in
it,
which
involves
land
development,
public
planning
processes,
budgeting
marketing,
a
lot
of
details
to
get
us
that
that
point
where
we
know
how
to
to
market
our
employment
lands.
J
Good
evening
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee
and
members
of
the
public
I'm
Sarah
watchful
and
welcome
manager
with
city's
real
estate
and
environmental
initiatives
group,
so
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
synopsis
of
highest,
invest
land.
You
study
for
Kingston,
Airport
I'll
start
with
the
overview
of
the
study,
and
then
what
are
the
opportunities
we
are
looking
at?
Where
can
these
be
located
the
timing
and
how
and
who
is
going
to
implement
these?
J
J
The
objective
of
the
study
is
to
establish
an
action-oriented
phase
development
plan
which
will
guide
future
land
development
at
the
airport.
Like
Pete
mentioned
from
our
experience
with
employment
lands,
we
have
learned
that
service
land
is
a
wider
factor
in
attracting
investments.
So
the
under
the
goal
over
here
is
to
service
airport
land
so
that
we
can
attract
more
investment
over
here.
J
Highest
and
best
land
use
typically
means
the
most
profitable
use,
but
it's
a
it's
not
the
same
goal.
That
city
has
city's
intention
is
Community,
Development
and
all
over.
Here
we
have
underlying
goals
over
here
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it
contributes
to
the
economy,
to
quality
of
life.
It
protects
the
environment
and
it
contributes
to
airports,
service
levels,
and
so
keeping
that
in
mind
we
had
refined
the
evaluation
parameters
which
are
used
to
evaluate
a
land
and
of
this
detail
is
available
in
X
ability
of
the
planning
committee
report.
J
So
the
white
boundary
over
here
shows
airport
land
and
the
study
area
is
divided
into
six
parcels.
It
excludes
the
area
which
is
gray,
that's
the
airport
operations
area,
runways
and
taxiways,
total
airport
lands
are
275
hectares
and
the
study
area
is
approximately
117
hectares,
so
study
area
is
almost
less
than
half
of
the
total
airport
lands
and
even
though
it
seems
like
it's
less
than
half,
but
it
is
a
lot
of
land
and
it
has
a
potential
for
development
for
many
decades.
J
Public
engagement
was
a
very
important
aspect
of
the
study.
We
had
two
open
houses.
One
held
at
the
outset
and
the
other
one
more
towards
and
when
the
consultants
had
drafted
draft
recommendations
for
the
study,
both
the
open
houses
were
well
attended
and
they
were
followed
by
online
surveys.
The
results
of
the
survey
were
uploaded
on
project
dedicated
web
page
and
they
were
utilized
all
through
the
study
analysis
for
this
evenings
planning
committee
report.
J
We
had
sent
emails
to
the
attendees
of
the
open
house
and
in
addition
to
that,
in
addition
to
all
the
notification
we
did
on
the
social
media,
one
more
thing.
In
addition
to
our
open
houses,
the
consultant
stayed
to
focus
group
discussions
and
30
one-on-one
meetings
with
people,
stakeholders
in
commercial
and
industrial
sector
who
were
interested
in
Airport
development.
J
The
consultants
also
did
a
very
comprehensive
review
of
past
studies
related
to
the
airport.
They
did
benchmarking
analysis,
comparing
Kingston
with
five
other
comparable
airports.
They
did
local
and
regional
strength
and
asset
analysis,
in
addition
to
that,
they
did
a
survey
of
25
companies
in
aerospace
sector
in
and
around
Kingston.
So
using
all
this
extensive
research
and
extensive
public
consultation,
the
consultants
came
up
with
four
target
sectors
or
development
concepts,
which
would
be
ideal
for
Kingston
Airport,
so
I'll
quickly
give
an
overview
of
each
of
these
concepts,
starting
with
the
first
one.
J
The
aviation
maintenance
center
concept.
This
concept
aims
that
attracting
various
companies
which
do
various
kinds
of
aircraft
maintenance
and
the
vision
over
here
is
to
have
that
different
kind
of
maintenance
at
the
airport,
so
that
it
is
a
one-stop
integrated
service
center
for
aircraft
maintenance,
which
would
be
highly
convenient
for
aircraft
users.
We
have
air
side,
land
workforce
and
a
huge
market
that
we
can
tap
into.
We
already
have
one
existing
business,
which
does
maintenance,
but
it
is
in
helicopter
parts.
J
The
second
concept
is
the
evolution
which
is
3d
or
additive
manufacturing.
3D
manufacturing
has
a
number
of
advantages
over
traditional
manufacturing,
especially
when
it
comes
to
aerospace
sector.
For
instance,
you
can
create
complex
aircraft
parts
using
a
single
production
process.
In
addition
to
that
parts
are
lighter,
which
means
lighter
aircraft
and
which
means
less
fuel
consumption
and
less
GST
emissions.
J
J
Second
is
a
Greenport
concept,
so
sustainability
is
being
embraced
by
various
airports
all
over
the
globe
and
the
airport's
are
making
more
commitments
to
be
greener
and
more
sustainable.
So
it's
a
it's
a
huge
sector
and
the
aim
over
here
it
is
to
attract
companies
and
organizations
which
to
research
and
development,
prototype,
manufacturing
and
business
incubation
in
sustainable
technologies,
specific
to
aerospace
sector
for
both
Greenport
and
evolution.
We
have
many
local
partners
and
it's
also
both
the
concepts
are
well
aligned
with
consoles
strategy
priorities.
J
J
The
last
one
is
general
aviation
Center
concept,
so
Ontario
has
a
very
strong
general
aviation
community
at
the
airport's.
Also,
we
have
two
thriving
businesses,
so
this
concept
is
use.
This
is
building
on
on
that
strength,
and
the
vision
over
here
is
to
attract
general
aviation
community
and
serve
it
through
by
choose
various
purposes:
for
instance,
recreation,
entertainment,
aircraft,
storage,
flying
clubs
and
flying
schools.
J
So
these
are
great
ideas,
and
next
is:
where
are
we
going
to
locate
them
at
the?
But
I'll
start
with
parcel
one
parcel.
One
is
south
of
Airport
operation
area.
There
are
a
number
of
existing
buildings
and
tenants
on
parcel
one.
We
have
one
vacant
land
over
here
which
is
vacant
parcel
which
is
east
of
the
terminal
building,
and
there
are
two
hangars.
J
These
hangars
are
being
used
for
general
aviation
uses,
but
these
hangars
are
very
old.
They
are
from
World
War
two
and
they
need
consistent,
consistent
maintenance.
So
the
study
proposes
that
the
users
of
these
hangars,
the
tenants,
be
relocated
on
parcel
5
once
parcel
5
is
serviced
and
this
parcel
being
up.
Prime
land
for
commercial
aviation
general.
The
aviation
maintenance
center
concept
would
be
ideal,
for
this
particular
parcel.
J
The
study
proposes
to
continue
as
a
golf
course.
One
is
that
Golf
Course
generates
non-aviation
revenues,
so
it
is
creating
revenue,
diversification
for
the
airport
and
secondly,
throughout
our
public
engagement.
People
have
expressed
preference
for
the
golf
course
to
be
located
over
its
current
location.
J
Parcel
for
is
a
prime
location
corner
of
Bay,
Ridge,
Drive
and
front
Road.
These
are
vacant
lands
and
they
are
suitable
for
hotel
office
content
center.
The
study
proposes
to
continue
as
an
undeveloped
property,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
other
land
which
needs
to
be
developed,
and
once
we
have
traction,
then
we
might
look
at
parcel
for
parcel
for
was
acquired
by
the
city
in
year,
2000
as
part
of
land
swap
deal
from
the
residential
developer,
and
at
that
time
console
had
directed
staff.
J
J
Parcel
5
is
the
largest
parcel
on
the
airport.
Initially,
this
parcel
was
33
hectares.
This
dotted
line
shows
the
initial
boundaries.
During
our
first
open
house,
we
heard
that
public
was
concerned
of
proximity
of
potential
development
being
close
to
the
residential
area.
So
the
consultants
looked
at
it
and
came
up
with
this
idea
to
extend
the
western
and
southern
boundary
more
towards
the
runway,
and
now
it's
almost
next
to
the
taxiway,
and
it
is
further
away
from
the
residential
area.
J
It
also
includes
a
lot
of
cleared
land,
so
what
is
shown
over
here
is
a
development
for
next
20
years.
It
is
only
20,
20
percent
of
the
parcel
which
is
proposed
for
development.
We,
the
consultants,
are
proposing
to
start
with
the
T
hangars,
because
hangers
do
not
require
water
and
sanitary,
so
the
initial
investment
would
be
low
in
terms
of
servicing
and
once
the
interest
built
in
then
we
can
fully
service
the
land
closer
to
year.
J
So
once
the
parcel
is
serviced
and
the
tenants
from
parcel
1
can
be
relocated
to
parcel
5.
In
addition,
airport
maintenance
garage
and
NAV
CANADA
can
also
be
relocated
over
here.
Furthermore,
Kingston
Fire
&
Rescue
has
expressed
an
interest
to
locate
the
fire
station
over
here,
because
it
would
be
better
centrally
located
to
serve
the
community.
J
Now,
coming
to
the
west
side
of
the
airport
is
parcel
6.
It
is
very
it's
adjacent
to
Lamont
Point
conservation
area,
so
any
kind
of
uses
proposed
over
here
should
be
ones
which
have
minimal
sort
of
impact
on
the
conservation
area.
It's
ideal
for
a
green
port
and
solar
photovoltaic
system
is
proposed
on
this
parcel.
J
The
gray
area
is
where
no
development
is
proposed
for
next
20
years
and
phase
one
is
in
orange
or
yellowish.
Color
and
phase
two
11
to
20
years
is
in
red
color.
So
this
is
a
same
plan
which
was
showed
at
the
second
open
house,
and
the
overall
overall
result
of
the
survey
showed
that
more
than
50%
of
the
respondents
were
supportive
of
the
concept
and
their
location
on
airport
lands.
J
J
Next
is
the
interim
action
plan,
so
we
are
a
long
way
from
putting
shovel
in
the
ground.
A
lot
of
work
needs
to
be
done,
especially
from
land
use,
planning
perspective,
and
we
can
do
some
work,
such
as
preliminary
layout
plans
with
and
checking
the
feasibility
of
solar
on
parcel
six.
This
could
be
done
with
internal
resources,
but
for
most
part
for
all
the
formal
development
review,
applications
for
marketing
and
business
strategy,
additional
resources
would
be
required
and
the
staff
will
come
back
to
Council
for
console
approval
and
budget
approval.
J
This
study
is
a
roadmap
which
just
shows
future
future
utilization
of
airport
lands
and
also
indicates
the
potential
of
airport
lands
to
the
market.
We
have
the
expansion
project
underway,
so
it's
a
good
time
to
look
at
the
airport
holistically
and
take
Airport
development
to
the
next
level.
Thank
you.
D
D
D
J
D
So
even
though
the
city
worked
to
deal
through
MN
RF
with
the
Lemoine
point
and
built
the
barn
swallows
structures,
this
is
the
first
year
that
those
structures
have
come
up
and
the
barn
swallows
are
only
going
back
to
the
airport
they're,
not
actually
nesting,
yet
in
that
barn
structure.
So
I
just
want
to
have
that
in
the
minutes
that
the
city
will
have
to
again
look
at
alternative
nesting
sites
when
hangars,
four
and
five
are
taken
down
whatever
year.
That
occurs.
We
we
need
to
work
with
MN
RF
and
remember
that
they're
there.
D
My
next
question
is
with
regard
to
purr,
so
number
six,
so
is
the
reason
why,
if
that
map
can
stay
up
on,
is
the
reason
why
it's
like
not
actually
on
front
road
or
closer
to
front
Road?
Is
that?
Because
it
would
be
too
dangerous
to
be
in
front
of
the
runway
like
to
me,
it
just
makes
more
sense
to
have
it
closer
to
front
Road,
because
that
takes
it
more
into
the
roadway
in
the
parking
lot
area
of
Lemoine
point.
D
H
Yeah
good
question:
these
parcels
were
laid
out
from
the
airport
master
plan
and
based
on
the
federal
regulations
for
air
travel.
It
is
has
to
be
set
back
from
the
runway.
We
have
airports
half
of
an
idiom,
more
technical,
but
if
these
are
conceptual
lines,
so
if
there
is
a
potential
for
for
a
solar
installation
and
it's
practical
to
move
it
closer
and
that
can
be
explored
at
that
detail
design.
But
at
this
time
these
these
Lots.
These
parcels
are
laid
out
based
on
what
is
a
permitted
area
for
development
on
an
airport,
great.
D
H
So
it's
it's,
it's
a
good
idea
and
something
that
we
want
to
explore.
There's
a
lot
of
options,
so
it
could
be
part
of
the
city's
goals
for
climate
change
in
GHG
reductions
and
offsetting
some
of
our
use.
It
could
be
used
directly
at
the
airport
to
to
power
the
airport.
It
could
be
used
to
to
supply
redundant
and
emergency
power
through
battery
storage
for
the
airport,
because
the
airport
needs
power
and
time
of
emergency.
So
all
these
things
are
we
want.
H
We
want
to
look
at
and
leave
nothing
off
the
table
right
now,
because
the
pricing
for
solar
installations
is
coming
down
and
making
more
sense
financially
to
use
it
on-site.
So
all
that
would
be
looked
at
and
it's
it's
interesting
to
know
all
the
different
applications
it
could
have
at
the
airport.
Thank.
A
K
Like
the
report
so
well
done,
whoever
who
are
all
involved
in
yourself
thank
you
for
that
I'm.
Very
supportive
of
this
development.
So
are
the
timelines
just
because
it
takes
time
or
if
there's
interested
parties
like
let's
say
I
like
the
idea
of
the
hotel,
Convention
Center
on
parcel
for
I.
Think
I
can
read
it,
and
is
that
because
you
have
to
develop
it,
we
have
to
do
a
lot
of
work
or
is
that
what
if
someone
was
interested
in
that
is
that?
Can
you
move
that
out.
H
H
Paced
swing
space
for
the
golf
course
if
other
lands
were
needed
that
were
closer
to
the
terminal
where
the
practice
range
is,
and
maybe
there's
a
way
to
to
rework
the
golf
course
a
little
bit.
So
lots
of
lots
of
different
options,
but
there's
just
set
so
what
what
the
potential
is
and
what
most
likely
likely
timeline
is.
At
this
point,
all.
K
Right,
thank
you.
That
said.
Well,
it's
really
I
like
the
idea
of
the
mixed.
You
know.
Even
the
fire
hall
there
off
of
Bay,
Ridge
and
I
can
see
why
they
might
be
thinking
that
there's
so
many
things
that
are
good
about
it.
I
just
want
to
commend
you
for
it
and
I'm
excited
to
see
things
hopefully
move
forward
a
little
faster,
but
obviously
as
things
develop
and
as
needs
are,
and
so
great
job.
I
Thank
you,
and
through
you,
oh
I'm,
the
counselor
for
this
district
and
I'm
really
excited
about
this
report
and
I.
Thank
you
so
much
for
everyone
that
was
involved
in
this.
This
is
a
great
report
and
it's
a
great
handbook
actually
to
start
a
lot
of
work
and
the
sooner
the
better
I'm
really
excited
about
this.
As
you
can
hear,
I
have
a
question,
though,
about
the
parcel,
5
and
I
was
thinking.
I
I
Would
we
have
taxi
serve
over
there
like
I'm,
just
thinking
it's
it's
sort
of
in
an
odd
place,
because
we'd
have
to
have
the
services
that
would
support
planes
coming
in
or
if
we
had
pilots
that
flew
in
and
wanted
to
see
the
city,
we
would
need
rental,
cars
or
taxis
again
over
in
that
area
or
bathroom
services
or
other
amenities.
That
would
service
at
so
is
there
some
way
we
could
get
like
shuttle,
cars
or
a
roadway
or
I
just
I
just
think
we
need
to
think
about
that
carefully.
H
So
there
are,
there
are
services
available
on
the
main
taxiway
at
the
terminal
site
of
the
south
and
the
the
airport,
and
the
thinking
is
with
with
the
T
hangars
is,
is
a
way
to
dip
the
toe
in
for
the
for
the
city
for
what,
wherever
the
investment
comes
from,
is
to
bring
in
access
into
that
area
to
generate
development.
That
is
needed,
but
isn't
the
full
rate
of
cost
where
water
and
sewer
can
we
brought
in
afterward,
and
it's
just
a
road.
I
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
an
excellent
briefing.
I
appreciate
that
we'll
move
on
to
the
first
bit
of
business,
the
portion
of
of
the
meeting
is
open
to
the
public.
The
city
has
initiated
a
new
process
in
which
members
of
the
public
will
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
for
up
to
five
minutes
on
comprehensive
reports
presented
before
the
Planning
Committee.
A
To
the
City
of
Kingston,
before
the
bylaw
has
passed,
the
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
The
decision,
I
believe,
is
that
what
I
should
be
reading
at
this
time,
because
for
this
recommendation
as
well,
because
I
thought
this
was
for
Planning
Act
Planning
Act,
but
it
wouldn't
apply.
I,
don't
believe
to
this
issue,
because
it's
not
a
Planning
Act.
A
We'll
take
that
under
advisement
with
the
with
city
I,
believe
that
that's
the
case
I
as
I
was
reading.
That
I
was
confusing
myself,
because
that
refers
to
recommend
comprehensive
reports
that
have
come
out
of
a
public,
Planning
Act
submission-
and
this
is
something
very
different
so
that
everything
I
just
said
disregard
with
this
particular
application,
because
I
don't
I,
don't
believe
it
applies
to
this.
A
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
thanks
to
staff
for
the
extensive
report
and
prostitutions
tonight
and
the
beat
we've
had
so
far,
I
followed
the
public
Constitution
process
going
to
both
meetings
and
staying
up
with
media
coverage
and
the
debates
of
Council,
so
I'm
gonna
begin
with
some
smaller
points
and
then
work
up
to
something
fairly
big.
F
So
one
of
them
is
a
question,
though.
Some
have
sort
of
been
raised
with
potential
a
new
fire
station
use
and
the
question
is
whereabouts-
is
the
closest
existing
fire
station
that
we
have
currently
in
operation
just
want
to
get
a
picture
in
my
mind's
eye
as
to
the
efficiency
of
this
potential
new
use.
F
If
you
have
a
new
fire
station
year
could
be
closer
to
emergency
uses
that
you're
gonna
be
putting
in
right.
So
that's
what
that
is
just
have
a
little
bit
of
an
objection
to
the
characterization
of
the
practice
range
as
being
vacant
right.
It
is
being
used
as
part
of
the
golf
course
operation,
so
it
it's
vacant
in
terms
of
not
being
anything
built
on
it.
So
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
confusing
I
guess:
Kerr
transition.
F
The
next
question
is:
where
are
we
now
with
respect
to
the
renovations
that
have
been
actually
approved
by
council
right?
We've
got
the
new
runway
or
the
annex,
an
extension
of
the
runway
north/south
when
going
in
for
a
thousand
feet
those
grooves,
and
then
we
have
airport
terminal
improvements.
So
I'm,
just
wondering
where
that
is
have
we
asked
you
started
construction
on
either
of
those
two
excuse.
A
Me
if
I
apologize
for
interrupting,
but
we
should
be
addressing
issues
as
they
relate
to
the
proposal
before
us
and
we've
had
public
consultation
and
public
meetings
regarding
the
airport,
expansion
and
those
have
been
a
plight,
have
been
approved
by
council.
So
questions
such
as
that
can
go
through
the
Commissioner
as
a
public
inquiry,
but
it
doesn't
relate
to
the
business.
That's
before
us
now.
A
L
F
F
One
of
the
concepts
that
you
introduced
as
the
new
use
she
got
three
of
them.
The
airport
maintenance
center
rights
is
very
interesting.
Does
that
require
an
extension
of
the
runway
to
be
a
viable
operation
right
now
the
runways
5,000
feet.
You
want
to
go
to
sex
right.
She
can
have
bigger
plans
all
right
now.
The
next
one
is
big
and
the
chair
may
rule
yep.
Okay,
like
essa
the
Bucks
curvy
you
produced
right.
So
it's
very
interesting
as
well.
That
isn't
actually
a
scientific
public.
F
True
way,
though,
right,
because
you
could
have
a
user
login
more
than
once
right,
it
isn't
as
it
likes
a
not.
Today
is
election
day
in
Ontario.
He's
person
has
a
chance
to
vote
once,
so
it
could
be
Ashley
flawed
in
that
respect,
just
want
to
put
that
out
speaking
as
a
math
person
now,
my
last
point
is
is
like
verse
enough
them
and
you're
talking
about
highest
and
best
use
of
the
land
right,
but
no,
no
scenario
other
than
the
airport
existing
on
that
land
has
ever
been
examined.
Is
that
an
accurate
Kirk
transition?
F
And
we
got
a
lot
of
public
dissent
over
what
happened
with
the
Constitution
process
right
there.
What
appoints
that
were
raised
and
the
what
devoted
Council
is
very
contentious.
There's
a
lot
of
discussion
there.
So
the
reason
I'm
raising
this
is
because
we
actually
have
another
airport,
that's
partially
within
the
city.
A
Excuse
me
I'm,
going
to
rule
this
whole
discussion
out
of
order
because
it
doesn't
address.
What's
before
us
talking
about
alternative
possible
uses
beyond
uses
as
an
airport,
it
is
an
airport.
This
is
an
airport
study.
That's
come
to
us,
that's
very
specific,
so
we're
not
about
to
start
a
broad
conversation
about
alternative
sites
for
airports
that
isn't
the
business
that's
at
hand
or
doesn't
relate
to
the
recommendation
before
us.
F
A
A
L
Mr.
chair
I'll
answer
the
question:
the
member
of
bubble,
gas
relative
to
the
fire
station.
The
existing
fire
station
in
vicinity
is
a
red
and
ail
fire
station
on
Days
Road.
That
fire
station
would
be
closed.
It's
a
vintage
that
it
should
replace
in
terms
of
it's
probably
at
this
stage
it's
been
revamped,
but
it
probably
would
need
to
be
replaced
in
future
and
replaced
by
the
one,
the
airport
site,
so
the
same
neighborhood.
H
There's
a
few
more
questions
to
address
so
I
duly
noted
the
practice
range,
although
it
has
no
above-ground
building
improvements,
it
is
vacant,
it
is
a
tenant
that
uses
it
and
it's
I.
We
recognise
it
as
a
valuable
piece
of
their
their
operation
and
we
have
a
good
good
relationship
with
the
landings
and
we
plan
to
continue
that
relationship.
The.
H
The
maintenance
center
does
not
require
any
extension
to
the
runway,
be
omelettes
already
planned.
It
is
for
aircraft
that
could
access
the
airport
and
I.
Don't
really
have
a
comment
on
the
public
survey.
I
do
concede
that
it
is
not
to
the
same
standard
as
a
intellection,
but
I
think
we
got
an
average
of
400
responses
for
each
of
the
questions.
I
think
that
number
is
six
in
my
head
and
we
were
happy
with
all
the
public
engagement
and
the
turnout
at
the
meetings
and
online
and
the
stakeholder
groups.
H
A
A
D
This
thank
you
Thank
You,
mr.
chair.
This
is
my
amendment
I'm
to
15.
When
we
had
the
public
meet
concern
all
along,
and
this
is
the
amendment
I
want
to
do.
I'm,
there's
a
beautiful
ambience,
as
you
drive
south
or
like
in
lower
Bay
Ridge
Drive.
As
you
come
off
of
the
you
know,
commercial
areas
of
days,
road
of
Gardner's
Road
come
down
favorites
Drive.
D
If
you
have
the
residents
and
then
you
have
the
woodland
and
then
you
have
the
runway,
then
you
have
young
the
Golf
Course
and
then
you
can
see
the
water
and
I
don't
want
that
ambience
broken
so
where
we're
gonna
put
the
future
Neighborhood
Services
area
I
just
want
as
much
as
the
tree
line
along
Bay,
Ridge
Drive
on
the
west
side
maintained
as
possible.
That's
my
big
thing!
If
we
think
this
is
not
possible,
we
need
to
then
look
at
the
maps
of
Mississauga.
D
So
there's
McLaughlin
Road,
it's
a
commercial
business
park
area
in
Mississauga,
there's
homes.
On
one
side.
You
can't
even
tell
that
there's
homes
out
submit
this.
Mr.
Clerk,
you
can't
even
tell
there's
homes,
you
can't
even
see
really
the
businesses,
because
they've
got
a
beautiful,
buffered
area
of
trees
and
grass
between
the
business
park
and
the
road
which
would
be
very
similar
to
what
we're
going
to
be
looking
for
for
this
future
neighborhood
services
area.
D
A
Amendments
are
allowable
from
this
floor.
If
you,
if
it
happens,
to
pass
and
you're
not
happy
with
it,
you
could
always
when
it
comes
to
council.
By
way
of
a
report,
the
planning
report,
you
can
always
request
that
it
be
amended
back
to
the
original
form,
but
it
is
in
order
to
ask
for
amendments.
It
isn't
in
order
when
we
have
recommendations
from
from
consultants
and
it's
their
professional
work,
we
can't
amend
that
at
that
point
other
than
making
separate
recommendations.
So
so
this
would
be
an
order.
I'm.
I
A
H
This,
the
short
answer
is
yes,
we
believe
it's
a.
We
can
accommodate
this
as
long
as
the
and
the
intention
for
Council
is
that
not
every
single
tree
has
to
survive
any
sort
of
development
there.
It's
it's
I
I
agree
with
the
councillor.
It
does
look
really
good
there
and
there
are
lots
of
good
examples.
Mississauga
is
one,
but
in
the
US
as
well,
you
can't
even
see
the
Walgreens
from
from
the
street,
because
they've
retained
the
the
trees
so
other
than
potentially
some
some
access
locations
or
to
topography
closer
to
the
development.
A
A
A
C
A
M
M
It's
a
bit
of
an
overview
because,
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
2016
file
and
I
just
want
to
mention
right
now
at
the
onset
of
the
presentation
that
the
focus
of
tonight's
presentation
is
to
not
exactly
get
into
the
specific
detail
of
every
single
piece
of
it
rather
provide
how
it
was
such
an
iterative
process
that
involved
staff
members
of
the
public
external
peer
reviewers,
as
well
as
the
city's
advisor
mr.
Brent
totter,
and
through
the
processing
and
refinements
of
this
application.
M
So,
as
as
mentioned,
the
project
is
located
at
575
611,
Princess
Street,
as
well
as
510
veronik
Street,
and
at
that
site
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
seek
an
official
plan
amendment
and
his
owning
bylaw
amendment
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
a
10-story
building.
That
building
is
to
be
mixed-use:
residential
and
commercial,
with
359
residential
dwelling
units,
565
bedrooms
and
900
square
meters
of
commercial
space.
M
This
image
here
is
actually
a
landscape
plan
that
was
submitted
in
support
of
the
proposal,
but
I
thought
it
was
a
good
one
to
show
from
a
higher
level
as
to
what
the
actual
plant
is.
The
red
line
around
the
perimeter
of
the
property
is
the
site
itself.
You
can
see
a
lot
of
the
rooftop
amenity
as
well
as
the
terraces
that
are
proposed
on
the
site.
It
shows
the
parkette
vegetation,
that's
proposed
in
planters,
along
princess
Street
and
Albert
Street,
and
the
double
double
row
of
plantings
along
Frontenac
street.
M
Just
a
very
quick
chronology:
the
property
is
located
in
Williamsville
in
the
community
destination
area,
which
is
area
two,
as
prescribed
in
the
opie,
the
Official
Plan
and
the
Williamsville
stretch.
The
woman's
own
Main
Street
stretched
extends
from
Division
and
Princess
Street
up
to
Bath,
Road
and
Princess
Street
intersection.
The
in
terms
of
the
dates.
The
key
dates
this
project
has
been
was
originally
discussed
in
2012
through
a
pre-application,
so
we're
dating
back
six
years.
H
M
M
We
provided
the
notice
for
the
requested
who
signed
in
at
the
public
meetings
and
we've
updated
the
signage
that
was
on
the
subject
property.
Further
to
that
there
was
courtesy
ads
that
were
put
in
the
paper.
The
newspaper
I
may
have
should
have
started
with
this
slide,
but
we're
here
now
and
the
sites
located
here
at
the
intersection
of
Princess
Frontenac
and
Princess
Anne
Elbert
and
it's
outlined
in
yet
in
white.
M
Looking
back
towards
the
site,
this
photo
is
taken
from
Albert
Street,
so
Albert
Street,
looking
south,
seeing
the
existing
two-story
lower
density
residential
development
to
the
left,
separated
with
the
three
and
a
half
story
townhomes
to
the
proposed
development
site,
which
is
at
the
intersection
and
fronting
princess
back
to
the
eastern
end
of
the
proposed
development
site.
So
at
the
corner
of
Princess
and
Frontenac
Street
moving
northward
on
Frontenac
Street,
looking
at
the
existing
church,
which
is
known
municipally
as
512
Frontenac
Street.
M
M
So
it
is
proposed
through
this
amendment
that
the
subject
property
be
granted
relief
as
it
relates
to
angular
plane,
which
is
a
provision
that's
prescribed
in
the
Main
Street
commercial
designation
of
the
official
plan
with
respect
to
the
existing
zoning.
The
subject
property
is
currently
entirely
located
in
that
c4h
with
the
t1.
So
that's
a
Main
Street
commercial
c4
zone
with
a
holding
symbol
attributed
to
as
attributed
to
the
site
as
it
relates
to
servicing
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
amend
that
zoning.
M
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
this
slide
in
detail,
but
we
can
revisit
it
with
any
questions
that
you
may
have
following
this.
A
quick
presentation.
Essentially
it
summarizes
the
proposed
relief
with
respect
to
that
c4
zone
that
the
applicant
is
is
seeking
primarily
relating
to
height,
angular,
plain
parking
and
bicycle
parking.
M
As
part
of
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
the
Official
Plan
amendment
to
remove
the
angular
plane
requirement,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
instill
a
height
map
which
is
here
in
front
of
us
on
the
screen,
and
the
height
map
is
one
that
can
accurately
address
the
complexity
of
the
massing
in
the
building,
as
it
specifically
relates
to
all
of
the
step
backs
that
you
see
on
the
building.
So
the
south
side
is
princess
street
and
you
see
the
large
three
indents
or
step
backs
into
that
building
and
they
all
happen
at
different
floors.
M
M
So
through
that
two-year
processing
and
involvement
within
the
community,
there
was
multiple
individuals
who
raised
concerns,
including
staff
and
members
of
planning
committee,
and
this
is
a
quick
summary
of
the
most
significant
concern
that
was
heard
through
that
time.
So
building
high
density,
the
design
of
the
building,
how
much
parking
is
actually
being
accommodated
on
site,
whether
the
rear
lane
can
be
implemented.
M
This
building
seems
quite
large.
How
is
it
going
to
transition
into
the
lower
density
development?
It's
in
the
neighborhood
amenity
space
servicing.
Those
were
a
lot
of
that.
A
lot
of
the
themes
that
were
received
so
with
that
I'm
gonna
go
through
the
next
few
slides
in
my
presentation
to
try
and
illustrate
how
these
changes
have
been
made
through
the
iterate
of
the
iterative
process
of
this
amendment
and
taken
into
into
fruition
with
the
development
before
we
get
there.
M
This
is
again
a
very
detailed
slide:
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
its
summarizing
the
submissions,
so
the
first
column
on
the
left
side
is
all
of
the
performance
standards
of
the
zone.
Talking
about
what's
being
proposed,
so
bedrooms,
height,
parking,
bicycles,
Park,
land,
etc,
and
then,
as
you
move
to
the
right
of
this
table,
its
submission,
one
submission
two
submission.
Three:
that
table
is
essentially
in
short,
showing
how
the
building
is
dropping.
In
height
the
units
are
decreasing,
the
GFSI
is
decreasing.
M
The
on-site
parking
is
increasing,
but
I'm
more
than
happy
to
revisit
that
and
explain
that
in
detail.
Should
there
be
questions
in
terms
of
the
graphics.
This
was
a
illustration
that
was
received
as
part
of
the
first
submission
that
showed
the
proposed
building
at
forty
point:
four
meters
in
overall
height
and
eleven
stories,
and
was
seeking
relief
to
amend
the
maximum
height
as
prescribed
in
the
Official
Plan.
M
The
site
this
slide
here
was
originally
introduced
into
the
into
the
slide
deck
to
try
and
show
some
changes
with
materiality
on
the
front
facade,
fronting
princess
Street
of
the
proposal,
as
we
went
from
submission
one
to
submission
two
and
three.
What
I
think
it
does?
A
really
good
job
of
is
showing
the
facade
articulation
and
all
the
step
backs
that
have
been
built
in
to
that
front
elevation
between
the
two-year
process
of
moving
our
way
through
the
approvals,
so
you
can
see
on
the
look
on
the
lower
slide.
M
The
four
main
components
of
the
building
on
floors,
two
through
four,
have
been
accentuated
much
greater
than
than
the
iteration
above,
and
what
that
is
is
to
try
and
break
that
visual
mass.
Although
the
plan
seeks
for
a
continuous
street
wall
along
the
corridor,
it's
also
expected
that
it
read
as
multiple
buildings.
So
this
is
the
rendering
to
illustrate
how
in
which
that
is
being
accomplished
at
all
different
stages
of
the
of
the
building
through
floors,
two
through
four
five
through
eight
and
nine
and
ten.
It's
also
it's
also.
M
It
should
be
noted
at
this
slide
that
the
applicants
proposing
masonry
cladding
at
different
bands
of
the
building
and
the
masonry
cladding,
as
well
as
those
lighter
colors
that
are
introduced
at
the
upper
storeys,
are
specifically
designed
to
to
try
and
make
it
blend
in
better
and
not
read.
As
for
individual
buildings.
That
are
completely
unrelated,
but
they
are
four
built.
It
always
one
building.
M
The
next
slide,
which
now
shows
the
revised
proposal,
speaks
to
again
those
four
blocks
of
the
building
that
have
been
that
have
been
amplified
through
increased
stepping
I,
believe
it's
a
metre
and
a
half
on
each
of
those
step
backs
to
try
and
get
that
visual
break
as
you
as
you
carry
through
the
bands
of
the
building.
So
it
does
carry
all
the
way
through
up
to
the
uppermost
stories.
M
Again,
this
slide
takes
the
same
image,
but
it
really
does
amplify
the
work
that
was
done
in
breaking
the
mass
and
also
the
work
that
was
done
at
grade
within
the
Williamsville
Main
Street
study
in
the
Official
Plan
at
grade
is
required.
60%
glazed,
four
windows
of
clarity
and
try
to
created
Street
animation
in
the
public
realm.
The
applicant
through
the
initial
submission,
came
in
with
I
think
a
hundred
percent
glazing
and
it
was
actually
requested
by
staff
through
the
peer
reviewers
and
the
support
of
mr.
M
totter
and
to
introduce
some
materiality
on
that
to
bring
some
of
the
mass
down
and
create
more
of
a
visual
to
that
act.
Grade
pedestrian
experience
along
the
corridor.
I
also
want
to
point
out
in
the
slide
that
the
ground
floor
is
a
consistent
four
and
a
half
meter
floor
to
ceiling
height,
which
is
one
to
accommodate
the
multiple
commercial
units
that
are
proposed
on
each
corner
and
the
gymnasium,
the
amenity
space
or
the
gymnasium
is
also
proposed
at
grade.
So
it
will
work
and
function
and
feel
like
a
proper
and
effective
gymnasium.
M
Again,
another
another
table
to
try
and
quantify
numerically
the
changes
of
the
pros:
the
changes
of
the
submissions
through
the
processing
of
the
application.
The
number
of
bedrooms
have
dropped.
The
number
of
the
square
meters
of
gross
floor
area
has
dropped
as
well
as
the
change
you
can
see
in
the
number
of
dwelling
unit
types.
M
What
was
the
term
micro
studios
and
the
micro
studios
were
approximately
200
270
square
feet
in
size
and
they
were
a
fold-up
bed
that
came
down
from
the
wall
and
there
was
not
a
lot
of
room
at
the
time
there
were
306
Mike
Grove
studios
proposed.
The
plan
has
changed.
I
would
say
so
substantially
that
the
smallest
unit
now
proposed
is
275
square
feet.
It's
still
small,
but
they're.
M
Eight
there's
18
of
those
units
over
to
the
next
slide
next
floor
plan,
there's
26
studios
that
are
310
square
feet
in
size
and
there's
a
hundred
and
seventy.
What
I
would
call
a
more
typical
sized
studio,
that's
362
square
feet
in
size,
so
the
other
comment
to
make
on
this
slide
is
that
the
original
submission
included
several
micro,
suites
and
and
studio
apartments
that
did
not
have
direct
access
to
the
outdoors
through
window.
Every
single
unit
in
this
new
proposal
has
a
direct
window
to
the
outdoors.
M
This
slide
again
back
to
the
concerns
that
were
raised
by
members
of
the
public
and
staff
were
bicycle
parking
and
on-site
vehicular
parking,
as
well
as
loading
spaces
by
definition,
and
by
requirement
of
the
bylaw.
The
applicants
required
2
loading
spaces
which
are
being
proposed
and
fully
compliant.
M
The
number
of
vehicular
parking
spaces
on
site
is
a
balance,
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
0.52
ratio
for
vehicles
to
dwelling
units
staff
had
the
supportive
traffic
analysis
and
parking
study
that
was
submitted
peer,
reviewed
by
an
external
third-party
professional
who
deemed
the
0.5
to
parking
ratio
appropriate.
Given
the
context
of
the
proposed
building,
as
well
as
a
one-to-one
bicycle
parking
ratio,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
exceed
the
1
to
1
bicycle
parking
ratio
by
providing
379
bicycles
on
a
bicycle
parking
spaces.
M
On-Site
and
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
a
portion
I
believe
42
bicycle
parking.
Spaces
are
proposed
to
be
outdoor
and
uncovered
so
through
the
amendment
the
applicant
is
requesting
that
permission
and
which
has
been
supported
by
staff
as
well
as
the
peer
reviewer
as
it
relates
to
short-term
bicycle
accommodation
on
site
for
users
who
may
want
to
use
the
commercial
units
at
grade
and
not
go
into
the
underground
parking
to
store
their
bikes.
M
M
M
Along
Elbert
Street,
so
the
top
graphic
shows
essentially
an
87
degree
angular
plane,
which
has
a
very
vertical
rear
wall
and
very
limited
transition
and
step
backs
to
the
three
and
a
half
story,
townhomes
that
are
located
directly
adjacent
to
the
proposed
site.
The
lower
image
shows
that
angular
plane
with
the
step
backs
that
were
cut
out
of
the
rear
portion
of
the
main
building
beyond
the
fourth
storey,
to
reduce
that
that
angular
plane
requirement
to
sixty
nine
and
a
half
degrees.
M
This
illustration
is
the
opposite
street,
so,
on
the
east
end
of
the
site,
the
building
abut
the
church
at
512,
Frontenac
Street.
The
original
plan
at
the
top
of
your
screen,
was
proposing
a
six
story.
Street
wall
that
carried
across
to
a
zero
metre
setback
adjacent
to
the
church
that
went
up
and
had
no,
no
stepping.
So
in
the
most
recent
iteration
of
the
plan,
the
four-story
Street
wall
is
continuing
across
and
along
Frontenac
Street,
which
wraps
the
corner
of
Princess,
and
then
the
multiple
step
backs
at
floor.
M
This
illustration
relates
to
a
rear
lane,
which
was
a
very
contested
issue
at
the
initial
onset
of
the
application
through
the
original
plan
that
did
not
include
a
rear
lane
to
the
requirement
in
the
Official
Plan.
That
does
require
it.
So,
through
the
through
the
revisions,
the
applicant
has
been
able
to
shift
a
portion
of
the
building
in
on
the
right
side
off
of
Frontenac
Street
allow
for
a
drive-through
area
where
the
building
does
extend
over
and
beyond
to
to
the
lot
line,
but
the
rear
lane
is
is
accessible
through
the
site.
M
It's
important
to
note
that
the
parking
spaces
are
accessed
where
this
number
two
is
sorry.
The
underground
parking
spaces
are
accessed
down
through
here
and
number.
Three
is
where
the
loading
spaces,
the
to
loading
spaces,
are
at
the
back
of
the
building
and
surface
their
limited
surface
parking,
as
well
back
here
and
across
the
back
of
the
building
for
more
of
a
short-term
parking,
as
opposed
to
the
longer-term
underground
parking.
M
So,
with
respect
to
community
benefits,
applicants
who
are
seeking
an
increase
in
density,
and/or
height
are
subject
to
section
37
of
the
Planning
Act
and
as
the
applicant
here
is.
Seeking
that
permission
the
city
is,
will
be
provided
to
hunt
approximately
two
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
in
in
the
form
of
Community
Benefit.
M
This
is
a
quick
illustration
to
show
a
more
detailed
sketch
of
that
parkette
that
is
proposed,
and
you
can
see
that
the
applicant
in
the
corner,
east
southeast
corner
of
the
building
is
proposing
that
retail
unit
or
commercial
unit
at
grade,
which
has
the
ability
to
then
spill
out
onto
the
parkland
and
really
animate
that
space.
It
should
also
be
known
that
conformation
has
been
received,
that
the
parkland
will
be
developed
and
programmed
with
the
input
of
the
community.
M
So,
in
conclusion,
staff
have
a
recommendation
in
front
of
you
tonight
that
the
proposed
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
do
be
be
approved,
as
it
is
our
opinion
that
it
complies
with
the
provincial
policy
statement,
the
Official
Plan
and
the
Williamsville
Main
Street
study.
It's
the
opinion
of
staff,
the
Provost
development.
It
represents
desirable
and
good
land
use,
planning
and.
M
Should
the
application
receive
approval
for
the
Official
Plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment?
The
next
step
would
be
safe,
plain
control
and
applications
for
that
have
not
yet
been
submitted
and
would
be
required
to
to
go
through
the
full
process
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
K
Really
small,
but
the
road
that
you
mentioned
it
was
in
the
back
the
service
road.
It
goes
to
that
part
where
the
number
two
is
there,
how
were
you
going
to
get
parking
underground
if
he
weren't
gonna
have
a
road?
There
wasn't
a
road
proposed
before
or
a
driveway?
Is
it
the
only
access
to
underground
parking
off
the
street
is
through
that
road,
yeah.
M
Sorry,
it
was
always
proposed
to
be
one
level
of
underground
parking
and
there
was
always
proposed
to
be
a
Porsche
of
that
rear
lane
to
be
accessible
via
four
vehicles
right,
but
it
wasn't
originally
proposed
to
be
through
from
a
front
and
act
all
the
way
to
Elbert
Street
all
time.
And
if
you
in
this
area
right
here,
you.
K
M
So
if
you
can
see
faintly
the
red
line
around
the
edge,
that's
the
property
line-
and
you
can
also
see
here
that
the
the
rear
lane
actually
traverses
on
to
the
neighboring
property
at
505
and
513,
Frontenac,
Street
or
sorry
Albert
Street.
So
that
is
something
that'll
have
to
be
recognized
through
an
easement
and
registered
on
title.
To
make
sure
that
that
may
continue
in
the
future
and
will
be
would
be.
The
applicant
would
be
responsible
for
submitting
that
application.
All.
K
A
Any
further
questions
did
I
understand
you
correctly
date
that
those
it'll
be
over
a
hundred
bicycle
parking
spaces
that
are
underground,
but
you're,
also
proposing
some
at
grade
above
ground
bicycle
spaces.
Probably
for
customers
of
of
the
retail
spaces.
Was
that
accurate?
They
weren't
included
in,
though
that
hundred-and-some
bicycle
parking
spaces
that
you
were
referring
to
were
they.
M
You're
correct
in
a
portion
of
the
required
on-site
parking,
bicycle
parking
may
be
located
outside
of
the
building
uncovered
and
in
the
draft
bylaw
it's
written
to
say
that
a
maximum
of
25
percent
may
be
outside.
My
math
isn't
good
enough
to
do
25
percent
of
359,
but
that
would
be
the
max
number
permitted
outside
the
rest
would
be
required
to
be
on
the
ground
floor
of
the
main
building
in
a
bicycle,
secure,
bicycle
room
or
underground
parking
levels,
one
or
two.
A
M
K
A
Again,
I
want
to
thank
you
and
staff
for
the
neighborhood
meeting
at
the
Memorial
Center
just
just
this
week
and
and
the
developers
for
presenting
that
I
I
guess
something
that
came
up
at
that
meeting
and
I'm.
Just
looking
for
public
confirmation.
Here
was
the
idea
that,
in
accordance
with
the
community
benefit
that
may
flow
out
of
this,
that
there
will
be
an
immediate
neighborhood
meeting
consultation
that
to
consider
how
that
money
should
be
spent.
N
Thank
you
and
through
you,
mr.
chair.
Yes,
so
it
is
our
intention
to
facilitate
a
public
session
specifically
to
look
at
how
to
best
utilize
the
money
that's
going
to
be
collected
through
the
community
bennett's
towards
a
grading
strategy
for
the
area
and
we're
just
looking
at
the
best
way
to
facilitate
that.
We
will
be
doing
that
prior
to
a
site
plan
approval,
so
that
the
community
has
the
confidence
related
to
understanding
how
that's
going
to
be
implemented.
O
O
As
you
know,
I'm
preoccupied
with
the
traffic
flow,
so
I
have
been
assured
that
there
will
be
no
stopping
in
front
of
the
building
that
students
packages
garbage
everything
will
go
through
the
rear
lane,
which
does
concern
me
to
some
extent,
because
we
have
one
very
small.
What
I
see
is
a
small
opening
on
two
Frontenac
Street
and
things
like
how
often
the
garbage
comes
and
so
on
it
so
forth.
I
believe
will
be
something
that
will
be
studied.
O
So
I
remain
very
concerned
about
how
that
opening
is
going
to
take
the
traffic
and
about
the
people
who
are
going
to
live
above
that
are
going
to
be
exposed
to
garbage
truck
noise.
Car
noise
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
can
be
I,
don't
know
how
you
fix
something
like
that.
I
hear
the
garbage
truck
and
it
doesn't
come
underneath
my
bedroom.
So
I
think
that
is
a
valid
concern
that
really
needs
to
be
looked
at.
I
would
prefer
to
see
that
open
to
thee
not
covered
with
living
space.
O
I
also
am
curious
from
this
drawings.
I
couldn't
quite
figure
out
the
space
at
the
Albert,
Street
and
I
heard
last
night
or
Tuesday
night
that
there
would
be
enough
space
there
for
a
patio
that
if
there
was
a
coffee
shop
or
something
there
and
yet
I,
don't
I,
don't
it
looked
to
me
like
it
comes
to
the
lawn
line,
but
I
don't
know
if
that
the
upper
floors
or
the
ground-floor,
so
maybe
planner
could
answer
that
and
I'm
just
curious.
Will
this
come
back?
O
M
Thank
you
for
your
questions,
the
determination
of
where
exactly
the
garbage
will
be
picked
up,
brought
to
the
curb.
How
that
all
will
work
on
site
has
yet
to
be
determined
so
through
the
bumped
up
site
plan
application.
It
is
something
that
we
will
work
closely
with
our
solid
waste
division
to
understand,
truck
flow
patterns
and
and
which
street
even
Frontenac
versus
Elbert
versus
Princess
may
be
used
to
collect
the
garbage.
M
The
setback
along
Albert
Street,
as
well
as
a
setback
along
princess
Street,
is
1.9
meters
at
grade.
The
1.9
meter
at
grade
setback
exceeds
the
required
setback,
that's
prescribed
in
the
bylaw,
it's
1
meter,
and
it
allows
then
for
the
upper
to
upper
storeys
2
through
4,
to
project
back
out
and
over
that
recessed
at
grade
level
and
provide
an
area
of
pedestrian
refuge
from
when
our
rain.
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
thanks
to
staff
and
the
developers
this
week,
who
took
part
in
the
session
at
Memorial
Center
two
nights
ago,
I
attended.
It
was
very
helpful.
We
learned
what
if
it
was
excellent
interchange
of
ideas
and
a
lot
of
questions
that
answered
there
so
I'm
going
to
start
off
by
freezing
the
improvements
in
the
project
since
it
first
came
forward
almost
two
years
ago.
I
think
that
the
West
massing
the
improved
design
and
just
the
sort
of
being
more
attractive
overall
I
think
is:
we've
really
advanced
a
lot
there.
F
So
I'm
gonna
praise
everybody
who
was
involved
with
that.
Second
thing:
I'm
gonna.
Praise
in
detail
is
the
realization
that
the
smaller
apartment
sizes
of
which
you're,
including
the
upper
portion
and
project
I,
see
that
as
that's
an
A+
aspect
is
I,
think
that
particular
style
of
accommodation
is
very
much
needed
in
Kingston,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
the
project
succeeds
and
that
they'll
be
very
good
demand
for
those
units.
F
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
move
into
I.
Think
in
one
of
the
slides.
You
sure
that
there
be
a
transit
shelter
just
on
the
scene,
sure
the
north
northwest
corner
of
the
project
and
I
would
suggest
one
as
well
if
we
could
have
one
on
the
strop.
That's
actually
kiddy
corner
to
that,
because
you're
looking
at
three
or
four
hundred
new
residents
going
in
there
and
I
used
that
stalk
a
lot
and
when
you're
in
raining
or
snowing,
it
is
kind
of
annoying.
So
that's
just
a
minor
point.
F
F
The
church
has
been
there
since
I
guess
it's
the
50s
or
60s,
and
the
proximity
of
the
new
project
with
respect
to
the
church
is
very
close.
So
I've
got
some
concern
over
just
the
safety
of
the
construction
as
you're
doing
the
project
if
it
goes
ahead
with
the
underground
parking
and
so
forth.
So
I
want
to
put
that
on
the
record.
F
Okay,
the
next
one
is
the
access
egress
aspect
which
the
previous
citizen
was
speaking
about
and
I
want
to.
Just
hit
another
aspect
of
that
from
more
of
an
urban
urban
design
perspective,
we've
got
another
very
large
project
which
has
been
approved
just
to
the
northeast
of
this
project,
site
on
Frontenac,
Street
and
they're,
actually
clearing
the
land
there,
they're
taking
down
buildings
and
forth
and
so
forth
and
so
forth,
and
it
is
also
gonna
have
underground
parking
access
from
Frontenac
Street.
F
So
you're
gonna
have
two
similar
access,
egress
aspects
very
close
together
and
that
concerns
me
in
a
neighborhood,
that's
otherwise,
fairly
quiet
and
residential
and
I'm
speaking,
both
as
a
resident
who
lives
about
four
blocks
wave
and
also,
as
a
retired
tech
person,
who's
done
some
traffic.
You
know
so
forth
analysis.
You
know
back
in
the
day,
I
didn't
do
it
in
my
career,
but
as
a
student
I
did
that.
So
that
really
concerns
me.
F
F
Thank
you,
and
maybe
just
in
terms
of
a
detail.
Could
we
have
a
number
on
the
physical
separation
distance
between
that
projects,
access
egress
and
this
one?
It
isn't
on
any
of
the
slides
and
I
would
suggest.
Finally,
a
few
bicycle
walking
stalls
on
princess
Street,
just
sort
of
the
standard
sized
city
already
has,
because
that
makes
it
easier
for
people
who
are
using
the
facility
you
do
if
they're
visiting
or
using
the
stores
that
are
there.
Thank
you
thank.
M
This
this
slide
here
actually
illustrates
the
proposed
transit.
Stop
at
the
I,
won't
call
it
the
corner,
the
intersection
of
Albert
Princess,
but
just
very
close
proximity
to
that,
and
through
this
process
and
through
the
site
plan
process,
the
applicant
is
required
to
convey
a
portion
of
land
in
that
area
to
the
municipality,
to
ensure
that
there
are
ample.
There
is
ample
space
to
develop
that
transit,
stop
with
a
full
shelter.
M
Comment
ax
has
been
noted
regards
to
the
concern
from
excavation
for
underground
parking
garages
to
the
close
proximity
of
the
buildings.
It
it's
something
that
the
applicant
is
aware
of.
It's
something
the
staff
are
aware
of,
and
it
will
be
monitored
through
any
any
pre
pre
development
and
through
the
construction
phases
should
the
application
be
approved.
I
don't
have
a
number
off
the
top
of
my
head
in
terms
of
the
proximity
of
the
ingress
egress
lane
on
Frontenac
Street,
as
it
relates
to
the
ingress
egress
lane
of
the
project
at
495.
M
Roenick
Street
across
the
street
I
do
acknowledge
the
fact
that
they
are
in
close
proximity
and
it
is
a
substantial
amount
of
new
vehicles
to
Frontenac
street
as
opposed
to
the
current
situation.
The
projects
in
the
corridor
have
all
been
reviewed
from
a
transportation
perspective
which
has
included,
have
been
peer
reviewed
and
there
is
ongoing
work
with
our
transportation
group
and
our
active
transportation
group
through
through
an
updated
active
transportation
master
plan.
M
I
believe
my
colleagues
can
probably
provide
much
more
insight
into
that
and
those
types
of
traffic
movements
and
pedestrian
movement
will
be
reviewed
through
that
through
that
process,
and
the
last
comment
that
I
have
noted
is
the
secure
bicycle
parking
along
princess
Street.
It
is
something
that
the
applicant
has
has
been
considering
through
the
process
and
will
ensure
it's
instilled
through
the
safe
mind,
control
process.
A
M
P
Very
good,
thank
you
very
much
Lori
Kaufman
v,
Oakwood
Crescent
I'm.
Also
a
landlord
I've
got
about
40
units
on
Frontenac,
Street,
so
I
know
the
parking
situations.
I
know
the
traffic
patterns
and
I've
watched
I've
tried
to
get
on
Princess
Street
the
way
it
is
for
many
for
I
guess:
I've
lived
there
for
18
years
number.
One
I,
guess
that
my
first
question
is
again
that
laying
at
the
back
I'm
curious
about
how
wide
it
is.
P
This
is
a
lane
one
and
a
half
across
or
is
it
two
across
or
is
it
a
single
one
and
how
big
that
opening
is,
if
you're
looking
I'm
a
landlord?
So
I
look
at
things
from
a
very
practical
point
of
view.
There's
a
lot
of
you
know,
there's
hundreds
of
regs
and
to
me
it
all
really
comes
goes
I.
Do
it
backwards,
looking
at
the
amount
of
parking
and
the
garbage,
you
know
really
the
things
that
people
have
to
live
with
every
day.
P
So,
let's
take
a
real,
quick
look
at
three
hundred
and
three
hundred
and
fifty
nine
units.
I.
Think
the
assumption
here
by
the
developer
or
what's
being
put
forward
is
that
small
one
bedrooms,
people
don't
want
people
won't
come
with
cars.
I
say
it's
the
exact
opposite
people
that
can
afford
a
one-bedroom
apartment
they're
coming
with
a
car.
P
It's
not
going
to
be
52%
when
I
was
talking
with
the
developer
by
the
way,
I've
loved
everything
that
he's
built
in
this
city,
and
it
was
really
excited
to
find
when
I
learned
that
he
was,
he
was
the
one
that
was
buying
up
the
princess,
Street
frontage
and
then
when
others
developers
were
given.
You
know
high-density
of
course,
why
the
heck
should
he
go
back
to
following
the
regulations?
P
Ten
years
and
I
can
tell
you,
you
actually
I
would
say
the
minimum
and
the
minimum
that
you
are
gonna
want
is
about
0.66
and
then,
if
you
reverse
that
backwards,
that's
and
you
do
it
by
bedrooms,
you
don't
do
it
by
apartments,
I!
Think
there's
a
does
the
city
or
city
now
not
recognize
that,
because
the
people
were
putting
five
and
six
bedrooms
in
an
apartment
and
then
requiring
only
one
spot
that
they
now
look
at
it
differently.
P
Gonna
have
400
cards
being
added
to
the
Tulane
Princess
Street
I've
spent
like
five
and
six
minutes
getting
on
to
princess
Street
when
I
lived
on
Frontenac,
and
so
here
you're
not
only
adding
four
hundred
cars
between
the
battery
development
and
this
development,
but
you're
looking
all
up
and
down
the
street
now
I,
remember
20!
You
over
20
years
ago,
I
had
a
hard
time
getting
a
triplex
put
in
here,
so
I
believe
in
density.
A
P
30
seconds,
oh
we've
got
a
time
limit
and,
of
course,
parking
saw
and
to
just
show
the
fact
that
the
place
if
the
thing
is
too
dense,
the
parking
size
has
gone
from
2.7
to
2.6
and
from
6
meters
in
depth
to
5
point
2
meters,
which
is
I
mean
I,
was
just
in
Korea
and
I
can
tell
you.
They
know
how
to
be
dense
city
and,
and
with
this
book
this
proposal
isn't
good.
My
my
time
is
done.
P
P
A
Of
those,
of
course,
our
site
plan
issues
so
and
if
I
can
recommend
anybody,
who's
speaks
publicly.
If
five
minutes
cut
you
off
and
you
still
have
something
to
say,
please
put
it
in
writing
and
send
it
to
our
planning
staff
and
it'll
be
put
forward
as
official
correspondence.
Thank
you
and
I'll.
Let
you
address
those
comments
and
questions.
M
M
Since
that
time
the
application
has
been
amended
and
more
on-site
parking
has
been
included
and
the
rationale
or
the
supporting
information,
as
well
as
the
peer
review
work
that
was
done
by
the
external
people
at
Dylan,
consulting
reviewed,
both
the
unit
count
of
359,
as
well
as
the
bedroom
count
of
565
and
deemed
the
on-site
parking
of
218
spaces
to
be
appropriate
at
the
point.
5
2
ratio,
that's
also
to
consider
a
parking
ratio
of
one
parking
space
per
hundred
and
50
square
meters
of
commercial
space.
M
That's
proposed
in
the
building
as
well
I
do
want
to
mention
that
in
the
draft
bylaw
that
staff
have
prepared
for
the
recommendation,
the
both
the
number
of
dwelling
units
359,
as
well
as
the
number
of
bedrooms
565,
are
capped
in
the
bedroom.
Oh
sorry
in
the
bylaw
to
ensure
that
the
parking
ratio
cannot
change
to
go
any
further
in
the
direction
of
less
on-site
parking
for
more
increased
units.
M
The
size
reduction
is
the
next
comment
that
I've
noted
down
2.6
by
5
point
2.
It's
the
by
law
currently
proposes
or
requires
surae
of
2.7
by
6.0
parking
stall,
and
it's
very
consistent,
as
you
saw
with
the
presentation
earlier
tonight
at
on
King
Street,
that
that
an
accepted
norm
is
2.6
in
width
and
a
5.2
installed
depth,
granted
that
the
access
aisle
to
service
and
get
vehicles
in
and
out
of
that
shortened
parking
stall
is
6
meters
in
width.
M
A
Ubers
all
of
those
vehicles
parking
along
princess
Street
I,
would
think
that
I
would
hope
that
princess
Street
would
be
a
no
stop
zone
which,
and
then
it's
an
enforcement
issue,
not
a
building
issue,
but
it
could
you
explain
as
I
understand
it.
There's
a
number
that
there's
a
rear
entrance,
it's
a
kind
of
through
entrance
to
the
building
and
pizza
deliveries,
move
in
move
outs.
Those
kinds
of
things
could
be
accommodated
from
the
rear
lane
way.
Could
you
speak
to
that?
If
you
would
certainly.
M
Through
you,
I
just
want
to
clarify
and
get
the
answer
to
the
gentleman
who
is
seeking
the
size
of
the
garbage
room,
fifteen
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet.
Approximately
145
square
meters
is
the
garbage
room.
That's
proposed
at
grade
in
this
location
right
here,
which
will
segue
into
the
to
my
next
comment.
M
A
I
A
I
will
in
a
shaker
to
put
this
on
the
floor.
Councillor
Turner
councillor
of
Sonic
any
further
comments
or
questions
seeing
I
just
want
to
say
a
couple
of
people
have
spoken
to
me
about
a
bump
up
of
site
plan,
and
so
many
of
the
questions
that
seem
to
concern
people
tonight
have
everything
to
do
with
site
plan
and
less
to
do
with
with
building
design.
I
do
want
to
say
that
I'm
very
this
has
gum.
This
has
evolved
enormous
ly
from
the
very
first
presentation
that
we
received
several
years
ago.
A
A
It
does
I
think
reduce
the
what
was
a
much
more
overwhelming
kind
of
look
of
the
building.
As
far
as
density
goes
so
I
appreciate
that
and
I've
gone
from
a
design
eye
I
said
I
could
never
support
to
a
design
that
I
said
ooh.
It
looks
better
to
a
design
that
I
can
support.
So
thank
you.
I
will
resume
the
chair,
which
I
should
have
given
over
sorry,
so
say
no
further
questions
or
comments.
A
I'll
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
thank
you
and
I'll
be
seeking
a
seconder
for
a
bump
up
at
Council
and
I
believe
that
process
will
take
place
after
the
motion
comes.
The
recommendation
from
planning
goes
to.
Council
can
either
be
the
same
day
in
motions
following
that
process.
Okay,
thank
you!
A
Thank
you,
dee
has
to
do
with
2666,
princess
Street
and
1027
Midland
and
his
file
number
D
1403
7:00
2017,
and
there
is
a
recommendation
before
us
any
any
comments
from
staff.
Or
should
we
go
right
into
questions
from
the
committee?
Let's
do
that.
So
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
committee
seeing
none
is.
A
F
Thank
mr.
chair,
I
just
have
one
question
and
I
want
to
be
just
clarified
on
this.
Looking
at
the
illustrations
in
the
report,
we
have
access
and
egress
from
both
Midland
and
Princess
streets
on
the
project
without
a
connection
between
the
two
right.
We've
got
building
aspects
separating
the
access,
egress
off
pool
of
Princess
and
Midland
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
he's
at
the
keys
and
that's
the
enemy.
Q
Sir,
looking
at
the
site
plan
before
the
committee
accompanying
the
recommendation,
there
is
a
second
access
over
the
McDonald's
property
abutting
the
site
and
there
would
be
easements
set
into
place
to
facilitate
cross
access
from
Princess
Street
over
to
Midland
in
terms
of
the
Midland
Street
access.
The
applicant
is
showing
a
write
in
and
write
out
only
for
that
access.
Q
A
A
So
we
have
no
motions,
we
have
no
notices
of
motion,
just
a
notice
of
a
notice
of
motion
for
bump
up
and
no
other
business
and
correspondence
is
as
we've
received
it,
and
it's
now
public
and
the
date
and
time
of
the
next
meeting
is
June.
21St
6:30
p.m.
in
this
build
in
this
room,
so
I
would
love.
There's
a
hockey
game
an
election
going
on.
If
somebody
would
care
to
move
adjournment,
that
would
be
great
pick
up
the
litter
all
those
in
favor
carried.
Thank
you
very
much.