►
From YouTube: Kubernetes Community Meeting 20160714
Description
We have PUBLIC and RECORDED weekly video meetings every Thursday at 10am US Pacific Time.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQDIAB0OqiSjIHI8AWMvSdceWhnz56jNpZrLs6o7NJY
Demo MiniKube; Demo Henge; Elders Proposal; 1.4 release features; Renaming PetSet; SIG-Testing; SIG-Scale.
A
B
A
A
with
suraj
deshmukh
and
then
we'll
go
through
and
talk
about
an
elders
proposal
which
I
posted
this
morning
we
have
some
1.2
feature:
release
updates
from
a.
We
also
have
a
conversation
about
the
potential
renaming
of
pet
set
and
then
the
usual
cig
reports
and
notices
as
we
have
some
space.
So
let's
get
started
so
Aaron.
Are
you
going
to
pick
us
off
with
your
first
demo.
C
D
A
A
B
So
yeah,
hello,
guys
there'll,
be
demoing,
hang
gay,
so
about
me.
I
work
at
credit
as
a
developer's
engineering
work
on
hangar
and
nearly
killed
/
atomica.
So
what
is
hangar
hangar
is
an
artifact
converter.
It
takes
dr.
Campos
file
and
spits
out
covin.
It
is
an
open
shift
artifact.
So
you
lost
like
why
hindi.
B
So
we
observed
that
like
getting
started
with
cubanita
an
open
ships
is
hard
because,
like
you
have
to
know
all
the
I
mean
at
least
some
basic
concepts
to
get
started
with
and
write
the
artifacts
and
get
your
app
into
working,
but
then
for
an
app
app
developer.
They
cannot
learn,
learn
the
concepts
at
the
same
time
and
also
get
everything
right
and
deploy
application.
So
so,
if
you
look
at
so
why
we
chose
dr.
Campos
because
it
should
look
at
it.
It's
it's.
You
I,
its
user
interfaces
like
easy
to
get
start
for
somebody.
B
The
curse
reps
is
here:
yeah
I
mean
come
on.
It
is
a
solving
the
American
engineering
problems,
but
I,
don't
containers
but
but
learning
constructs
is,
is
not
easy
job
either,
so
so
yeah.
So
installing
hangar,
it's
it's
very
easy,
go
get
and
certain
Ingo
usage,
some
of
these
commands
I,
will
show
you
in
the
I'll,
show
you
in
the
upcoming
demo,
so
yeah
alright.
B
B
E
B
It
and
see
so
so
so
are
we.
Our
way
forward
is
like
so
we
started
out
with
open
shift,
only
so
often
shift
cam
with
the
feature
of
importing
taco
compost
file,
which
which
took
the
napkin
postcode
and
I
used
it
in
open
shift
internal.
So
we
took
it.
We
took
it
into
hangar
and
created
some
common
line
FS
around
it
recently
added
community
support,
but
then
recently
like
lost
last
week,
we
saw
that
like
compose
booting
into
into
compost.
To
recently
we
had
talked
talked
with
them
and
we
were
viewed.
B
B
We
would
like
to
work
with
the
community
to
get
this
thing
easier
for
everyone,
so
the
main
thing
is
to
bring
bring
more
people
to
Copernicus
and
and
and
in
effect,
tiny
as
a
side
effect
will
end
up,
adding
more
things
to
communication,
open
ship
and
with
skybox
composed
too.
We
have
already
started
adding
creating
issues
and
collaborating
with
them
so
yeah,
that's
it
from
myself
and
wine
for
the
links
you
can.
The
links
at
the
end
of
the
slide
I
will
share
this
slide
with
server
so
that
she
can
put
it
in
the
doc.
A
A
A
F
Okay,
awesome,
alright
sure
yeah,
so,
okay,
all
right,
so
alright,
so
on
your
infernal
I'm
with
Dan
right
now
and
a
part
of
the
cloud
developer,
velocity
team
at
Google
and
today
we're
gonna
be
showing
a
mini
cube.
So
what
is
make
you
mini
cube
is
a
local
development
environment
for
Cooper
Nettie's,
and
essentially
it
has
everything
you
need
to
get
started
with
Cooper
Nettie's
and
rather
than
just
yeah,
can
we
talk
about
it?
I'm
gonna
show
you
them
home.
F
So
right
now
we
have
our
mini
cute
binary,
which
I
got
here
from
our
releases
page
everyone's
just
installed
a
mini
cube
and
Iran
mini
coupe
start.
It
took
about
a
minute
30
seconds
to
get
started.
I've
configured
soccer,
the
two
pretty
much
use
in
our
committee
cube
and
let's
get
into
it.
So
first
thing:
I'm
going
to
run
we're
gonna
set
up
a
proxy
to
visualizer
using
cute
control.
F
So
now
what
I've
done
is
pretty
much
I've
set
up
like
a
visualizer,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
what's
going
on
and
now
I'm
going
to
run
a
deployment
using
cube
control
a
little
so
many
cubes
running
the
background.
Its
provision
to
vm,
that
is
everything-
that's
needed,
uppercu
benetti's.
F
So
now
I'm
going
to
supplement
and
there's
a
page
and
you'll
see
here
at
essentially,
I
started
a
pod
in
communities,
and
this
is
what
we're
seeing
right
here
through
mini
cube,
and
what
this
looks
like
architectural
e
is
that
so
we
have
the
mini
cube
binary,
it
went
and
it
spawned
a
vm
using
a
lip
machine,
and
so
this
DM
I
started
running
a
local
cube,
which
is
a
Oh
binary
that
runs
everything.
That's
necessary,
Cooper
Nettie's.
So
in
having
a
mini
cube,
configure
your
tube
control
to
talk
with
local
cube.
F
We
can
now
use
cute
control,
just
like
you
would
in
your
cluster
ordinarily.
So
we
can
do
something
like
Yale
up
our
pods
and
we'll
see
the
output
in
the
visualizer.
So
this
will
get
scaled
up
the
four
pods
and
we
can
even
do
so.
If
you
just
kind
of
iterative
development,
we
can
edit
this
we
can
edit
our
pods.
F
And
I
would
see
here
that
disappointment,
add
replication
controller
in
it
that
will
go
in
and
change
our
Nautilus
pods
over
to
kitten
pods.
So
and
now
what
you
through
mini
cube,
we
have
full
access
to
the
ladies
API,
just
like
you
want,
and
so
this
is
kind
of
like
a
like
a
basic
demo
with
this
visualizer,
but
you
can
also
now
you
can
kind
of
think
of
now
that
we're
running
locally.
F
You
can
actually
be
more
previous
than
previously,
because
you
don't
actually
even
need
to
upload
images
like
our
docker
images
to
repositories,
we
can
just
run
local
images
all
right
now.
I'll
use
a
mini,
Cuba
feature
this
dashboard,
which
pretty
much
just
accesses
a
dashboard
so
that
you
can
see
pods
as
they
get
provision
and
then
so
I
mentioned
its
prior,
but
so
I'm
just
going
to
show
you
I've
pre-built,
these
two
hello
world
images
and
I'm.
Just
going
to
show
you
hear
that
these
are
all
the
images
accessible
on
the
vm
right
now.
F
So
we
have
our
hello
world
image
and
what
this
is
is
the
note
app
that's
going
to
say
hello
world,
so
I'm
just
going
to
this
is
our
deployment
for
this
app.
So
you
can
imagine
so
one
who's
trying
to
global
development.
They
made
a
disappointment
and
these
images
so
now
let's
go
and
create
this
oops.
F
Okay,
so
we
see
here
that
we
provision
our
this,
like
30
replicas
of
our
note
app
and
whether
we
can
access
this
is
now
that
we
are
using
a
mini
cube.
We
can
use
a
service,
so
we
use
mini,
keep
service
front
end.
F
Oh
sorry,
I
forgot
to
know
we
need
to
expose
our
the
deployment
we
just
made
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
service
called
front
end
that
will
expose
it
and
then
we
using
the
cube
service
in
the
name
of
the
service,
and
this
will
actually
open
up
through
the
vm
using
a
proxy
like
we
can
we'll
open
it
through
that
note
or
service
that
we
made
and
we
can
actually
access
it.
So
now
you
might
imagine
someone
to
try
a
new
some
kind
of
local
development.
Okay,
instead
of
this
hello
world
app.
F
Maybe
they
want
to
change
the
text
or
something.
So
we
have
an
updated
version
here.
I've
already
built
this
image,
as
you
saw
on
docker
images,
so
we'll
go
and
we
will
edit
our
deployment
okay
and
this
actually.
So
this,
like
is
going
to
take
like
brother
like
roughly
30
seconds,
but
so
essentially
you
can
see
here
that,
through
mini
cube,
we've
pretty
much.
We
started
having
to
dr.
F
build
soccer,
push
to
GC
our
soccer,
pull
that
down
again,
so
we
kind
of
like
made
that
wonderful
passer
also
if
people
aren't
comfortable
trying
the
images
that
they
don't
know
where
they
want
to
take
your
images.
F
People
can
now,
instead
of
having
to
figure
out
how
to
use
a
private
repository
with
your
benetti's
or
update
all
the
api's,
they
can
now
I'm
kind
of
just
do
local
development,
which
we're
seeing
from
users
is
it's
like
a
boon
for
a
lot
of
people,
so
just
going
to
make
sure
okay
and
we
have
a
version
two
of
our
app
okay.
So
so
this
is
just
kind
of
way
that
we're
kind
of
hoping
that
needy
cube
just
trying
to
allow
local
development
for
cuva.
F
Ladies
users,
to
be
kind
of
quicker
and
easier
to
get
started.
So
just
from
the
main
page
of
eq
we
have
like.
So
the
main
purpose,
as
mentioned
before
mini
cube,
is
to
make
it
as
simple
as
possible
to
run
communities
from
your
local
machine,
and
we
can
see
here
some
of
the
goals
that
we
have
listed
so
right
now
mini
cube,
has
a
couple
dependencies.
F
For
example,
you
saw
that
provision
VirtualBox
machine
in
my
case
I,
currently
sports
VirtualBox,
vmware
fusion,
k,
vm
x,
I've
on
Mac,
so
we're
trying
to
make
it
so
people
can
simply
download
mini
cube,
and
that's
the
only
thing
that
any
of
you
started
with
Cooper
Nettie's
we're
trying
to
get
more
feature,
support
on
the
future.
Things
like
a
post
directory
mounting
and
all
the
functionality
communities
like,
for
example,
ingress
proxies
like
these,
like
that
are
features
that
we're
working
on.
F
We
hope
to
get
a
rocket
container
support
in
the
future,
and
just
a
little
bit
about
the
community
has
been
a
phenomenal
and
very
supportive,
both
communities
you
can
see
here.
This
is
our
star
graph
that
we
have,
but
it's
really
the
community.
This
seems
to
be
a
real
pain
for
people.
F
Is
a
lot
of
people
really
want
to
use
and
develop
for
communities,
and
they
they
don't
exactly
know
how
to
get
get
started
or
the
best
way
to
do
development
on
communities
how
they
can
rack
with
the
newest
features,
and
it
seemed
to
be
a
painful
infrequent
that
the
community
is
kind
of
showing
that,
and
we
appreciate
all
of
you
guys
to
go
and
check
out
and
you
can
become
part
of
our
community,
because
we
think
that
it's
always
like
a
real
problem.
A
lot
of
users
experiencing.
A
F
You
can
hear
me
yes,
oh
yeah,
oh
yeah,
yeah,
absolutely
so
that
is
a
kind
of
a
future
I
think
it's
listed
in
the
future.
We
do
hope
to
support
pretty
much
like
removing
the
the
independency
entirely
and
supporting
like
a
hyper-v
like
all
the
built
in
a
virtualization
hardware
for
like
Windows
and
Mac,
but
as
of
right
now
it's
like
more
of
an
extended
goal.
Right
now,
that's
like
probably
more
like
q4.
G
H
A
A
So
much
fun,
alright,
any
other
questions
for
the
mini
coop
people.
A
Thank
you,
Eric
man.
That
was
awesome.
It
really
does
a
space
that
we
need
count
the
new
fruits.
Thank
you
alright.
So
next
up
on
the
ladies,
a
gender
list
is
an
elders
proposal,
so
I've
mentioned
here
before
that
we
have
we,
as
the
community
we've
grown
very
broadly
and
very
rapidly,
because
we
chose
to
have
a
benevolent
dictator
for
life
sort
of
model.
A
We've
ended
up
with
the
painting
and
jewelry's
of
one
of
the,
not
so
a
clear
and
transparent
any
port
hierarchy,
but
that
also
means
that
we
have
had
the
benefits
of
offensive
of
meritocracy.
As
there
are
many
bits
written
about
valve,
one
has
talked
about
many
a
great
length
about
how
an
inclusive
power
structure
forms
if
there
is
no
expert
power
structure.
A
So
in
order
to
make
this
a
little
bit
were
cleared,
watchman's
parent
of
how
to
grow
from
the
communities
community
and
how
to
get
disputes
around
technical
things
or
social
things
or
person,
personality
and
personnel
things
resolved.
I
have
put
forward
a
proposal
in
the
github
community
issues,
space
that
we
have
called
the
elders
proposal.
Basically,
we
make
a
triumvirate
which
will
grow
to
be
a
five-person
body
through
engagement
with
the
elders
and
that
these
people
would
basically
be
escalation
points
for
potential
technical
disputes.
A
They
could
act
as
a
Supreme
Court,
hear
arguments
on
both
sides
and
then
come
to
some
sort
of
decision.
They
could
act
as
a
a
feature
in
or
out
resolution
point
with
some
sort
of
with
a
similar
sort
of
model.
They
can
help
handle
any
personality
disputes.
They
can
help
us
grow,
be
the
contributor
progression
model
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
grow
the
community
but
basic,
be
the
highest
level
of
technical
and
project
vision.
Leadership,
which
includes
both
technical
and
person,
person
and
open
source
community
management
leadership
as
well.
A
A
Those
three
choose
the
next
two
to
fill
out
this
late
for
the
next
year
and
that
will
give
us
a
a
nice
first
year
model
for
having
others
in
place
and
people
that
we
can
escalate
to,
while
still,
whilst
figuring
out,
how
to
make
this
a
more
democratic
process
going
forward
and
how
we
want
to
maintain
this
escalation
point
in
our
community.
Does
anybody
have
questions?
I
know
I,
waffle
down
a
bit.
I
A
E
A
First
year
was
the
one
that's
odd,
because
you
have
to
set
that
up
so
I
believe
that
we
can
come
up
with
a
three-person
slate
that
is
relatively
uncontroversial.
You
know
the
people
who
are
acting
already
as
leaders
we
put
that
forward
as
a
slave
to
the
community.
They
two
more
but
those
two
because
they're
brought
in
through
relationships
in
the
existing
experience,
as
opposed
to
broadly
from
the
community
I,
wanted
to
limit
that
since
we
needed
to
make
it
a
rotating
term
anyway.
A
So
the
first
three
that
will
go
put
in
as
a
slate
with
a
vote
from
the
community
will
be
a
two-year
term.
They
will
choose
two
people
to
augment
that
which
would
have
a
one-year
term
until
next
august
and
then
from
there
every
year
some
portion
of
the
elders
could
rotate
or
they
could
make.
You
know
if
they're
doing
exactly
the
job
that
everyone
wants.
Then
they
just
get
voted
back
in.
A
I
A
Could
do
that
I
was
hoping
we
could
vote
for
august
one
once
I'm
going
to
put
forward
a
slate
or
I
would
like
to
put
forward
a
slate
next
week
and
I'm
open
to
suggestions
and
people
offering
me
names.
I
think
I
given
that
work,
starting
with
people
who
have
you
know,
been
long-standing
large
contributors
in
the
community.
I
don't
think
that
it's
going
to
be
very
controversial,
but
if
people
have
specific
opinions,
I'd
love
for
them
to
send
me
this
way.
A
A
Certainly
so,
yes-
and
in
this
case,
putting
forward
putting
forward
a
slate
as
quickly
as
possible,
is
to
get
us
to
something
that
is
working,
but
also
I
also
left
in
the
document
that
they
could
add
an
additional
two
members
or
would
be
expected
added
additional
two
members
over
the
next
year.
So.
A
The
voting
next
year
would
be
much
more
formal
this
year,
I'm
hoping
to
be,
you
know,
generalized
consensus,
I,
don't
I,
don't
expect
that
this
will
be
contentious.
As
I
said,
we've
got,
we've
got
many
fantastic
contributors
who
have
been
long-standing
with
the
project
and
are
clear
leaders
as
it
is.
So
I
think
the
vote
this
year
is
a
little
less
like
of
a
true
democratic
vote
and
a
little
more
like
yeah.
That
sounds
cool
as
opposed,
and
you
know,
and
if
people
have
real
concerns
then
then
we
have
a
longer
conversation,
but
I
don't.
A
Good
enough,
oh,
if
yes,
please,
if
everybody's
happy
about
this,
then
send
me
suggestions
if
you
have
particular
names
or
obvious
people
that
you
think
should
be
participating
this
or
might
not
have
been
considered.
I
have
a
long
list
of
people
and
have
been
turning
to
figure
out
the
best
starting
dynamics
for
this.
So
if
everybody
is
all
good
with
this,
I
will
bring
forward
a
slate
next
week
and
we
can
then
through
the
dev
mailing
list,
and
this
meeting
basically
ratify
the
slate
and
then
from
there.
A
J
So
unfortunately,
I
have
no
ability
to
share
my
screen
because
I'm
using
my
android
tablet
for
this
girl
but
yeah
postolder
links
all
the
necessary
links
to
web
mitcham
midi
notes.
So,
let's
start
from
from
the
first
item,
determine
it
I'd
like
to
propose
so
I'd
like
to
propose
prayed
there.
J
Wandered
for
milestone
within
the
cabinet
is
features
reform,
because
the
current
moment
I
see
that
we
have
a
lot
of
features
that
that
we
may
include
into
the
following
within
one
word
for
at
the
same
time,
we
don't
have
milestone
wanted
for
yet
so
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
receive
some
situations,
saves
on
SN
a
concern,
sir
such
like
that,
if
no
so
let's
go
ahead
and
add
milestone
one
at
four
and
Mark
all
their
existing
feature.
That
going
to
be
added
to
wondered
for
Lisa
smile,
milestone,
wonderful.
J
D
Can
ask
a
question
about
features,
get
sure
at
some
point.
Does
it
does
anyone
else
think
it'd
be
useful
to
just
define
what
level
of
maturity
or
consensus
is
required
before
we
put
something
in
the
features
repo
I
know
it's
a
long
ways
from
it,
but
I
don't
want
to
get
to
20,000
issues.
You
know
next
year
because
we
have
things
in
there
we're
not
working
on
anyone
else
concerned,
or
is
that
just
me.
J
Yeah
I
also
searched
about
did,
but
they
haven't
thought
about
the
way
how
to
solve
it.
That's
right
now
we
have
everything
fine
in
our
future
through
but
yeah
my
grow
is
use
it
one
day
we
may
receive
1,000
new
features
from
any
any
people
that
it
won't
work
on
them,
and
it's
simply
like,
like
some
dust
in
our
or
a
vicious
rumor
like.
I
My
two
cents
is
a
much
closer
I
think
where
Eric
is
going
with
this
I'd
like
things
that
move
into
the
future
repo
to
be
at
least
in
a
fairly
mature
proposal
form
and
in
order
to
get
to
a
fairly
mature
proposal
form
theoretically
with
the
sig
or
some
equivalent.
That's
just
my
two
cents
I,
you
know
I,
don't
want
to
slow
down
features
and
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
really
should
be
four
things
that
you
know.
Theoretically,
will
land
or
portions
of
them
will
land
in
the
neck?
J
Snow
like
oh,
the
features
has
to
be
approved
and
agreed
with
seeks
before
they
little
bit
yeah
and
it's
it's
like
the
part
of
our
float
that
we
have
already
discussed
equation
proposal
is
Mike's
afar
off
here,
so
yeah.
That
sounds
good
and
that's
why
I'm
also
proposing
to
add
some
labels.
28
labels
like
six
way,
is
marking
this
six
groups
or
anything
else
how
to
define
what
what
specific
sake
is
going
to
work
and
what
specific
c-can
we
interact.
Waste
forget
in
this
video
yeah
and
it
should
be
a
good
filter
for
that.
K
J
J
File
so
I
post
a
link
to
it
in
in
a
meeting
notes
again
and
possibly
it
should
be
a
better
way
to
well
like
to
to
track
and
to
find
some
information
or
getting
our
existing
religious,
so
well
update
was
there
from
Lane
yeah,
so
I
supposed
it
should
be
better
to
to
have
these
items
in
our
future
strip
of
that
community
week.
Cuz
community
wiki
is
a
bit
front
place
for
that.
In
my
opinion,
you.
J
A
J
J
Yes,
so
another
another
question
and
as
a
two
main
question,
so
that
I
have
so,
are
we
going
to
move
our
already
proposed
features
to
to
Cuba
necessary
po2
to
the
new
feature
strip?
So
I
suppose,
if
we
are
going
to
include
some
of
your
features
to
wander
for
relay
Center
to
the
fuser
federal
releases,
I
would
have
to
move
some
some
issues
and
sir
pr's
from
cabinet
history,
but
main
concern
that
I
have
that's
how
to
move
discussions.
So
some
issues
and
Paris
April
a
huge
discussions
and
Errol
important
for
I.
D
D
Some
thoughts
on
that
yeah
they
should
not
be
moved.
The
features
repo
should
try
to
be
a
summary
and
discussions
that
are
legacy
in
the
coup.
Benetti's
repo
can
stay
there.
They
can
get
turned
into
proposals
or
design
docs
or
whatever.
That
would
be
great.
That's
part
of
features
we
go
enforces
the
discussions
get
summarized
in
the
future.
D
Going
forward
of
people
want
to
use
Google
Docs
and
that
their
sig
that's
what
their
sig
wants
to
use
for
discussions
or
email
or
paper
airplanes,
with
notes
on
them
like
I,
don't
care
as
long
as
they're,
not
in
the
features,
repo,
every
single
+1
and
what?
If
we
did
it
this
way,
because
I
want
features
repo
to
be
a
place
where
people
that
have
to
have
a
broad
view
can
go
and
get
a
summary.
J
D
Totally
expected
that
you
have
a
features,
repo
issue
which
summarizes
like
the
lifetime
and
all
the
lifetime
evolution
issues
of
it,
and
then
it
links
back
to
here's
our
initial
discussion
and
that's
a
coronary
po
item,
no
editing
needed
for
either
you
just
have
to
parallel
ones
and
they
have
different
audiences.
Okay,.
J
Okay,
I
get
it
yeah
and
another
question.
So
what's
what
we're
going
to
do
with
some
non-core
cabinet
is
features,
some
not
features
but
items
yet
like
see.
It
worries
some
extra
installs
that
have
their
own
repose
in
communities
organization,
but
they
are
like
early
important
as
well
for
for
the
wall.
Cabinet
is
as
a
product,
so
I
suppose
we
have
to.
J
We
have
to
include
some
extra
features
for
for
these
components,
to
the
features
reply
as
well,
so
like
track
them
in
a
in
the
in
the
same
percent
in
in
the
same
some
vegan,
yeah,
yeah
and
yeah.
The
final
item
from
me
so
I
am
constantly
populating
the
spreadsheet
it
that
had
been
suppose
really
useful
for
a
foreign
in
cabinet
is
one
two
three
a
few
weeks
ago,
so
I'm
going
to
so
I'm
populating
it
right
now.
J
A
Thank
You
Igor
and
thank
you
for
all
of
this
work
against
1.4
milestones
in
the
future.
Repo
and
digging
in
on
this
I
know
you
and
Mike
stepped
up
at
the
end
of
1.3
to
sort
of
figure
out
where
we
were
with
all
the
features
and
then
give
us
a
better
summer.
Even
we
had
had
three
weeks
prior
to
that,
and
now
getting
us
on
a
process
for
1.4
is
awesome.
Thank
you
and
Eric.
Your
features,
repo
is
going
to
prove
to
be
invaluable,
I.
A
I
As
per
the
standard
for
computing,
there
are
only
four
hard
problems
in
computing:
I
ruined
the
joke,
three
hard
problems
in
computing,
naming
cache
invalidation
and
off
by
one
errors.
Of
course,
yeah.
The
naming
is
one
of
them,
and
in
this
case
in
particular,
we
don't
want
to
make
this.
A
big
thing
we
cut
set
was
always
intended
to
be
a
code
name.
It's
not
a
thanks,
claim.
I
know
I
totally
ruined
it.
Sorry,
moving
on
and
Justin.
Sorry,
I
will
stop
looking
at
chat.
Uber
Nettie's
is
not
a
name
just
to
be
clear
everyone.
I
It
is
a
code
name
by
itself.
The
and
the
answer
is
its
cross
cluster
Federation.
That's
it
okay,
so
Luba
Nettie's
is
a
codename
pen
set
was
also
intended
to
be
a
code
name.
It
is
not
follow
our
descriptive
model
of
how
we
like
to
name
things
in
increments,
it's
a
little
bit
too
cute
and
so
we'd
really
like
to
move
to
a
more
descriptive
name.
We
do
not
want
this
to
go
on
for
some
insane
amount
of
time.
You'd
like
to
close
this
very
quickly.
We
may
end
up
and
landing
on
pet
set.
I
A
D
I
I
mean
I
think
way,
I
won't.
I
won't
give
my
bias
right
now,
but
I
so
I
won't
name
any
in
particular,
I
think
we
have
some
very
clean
ones
that
people
are
already
starting
to
coalesce
around,
that
are
nice.
They
are
descriptive
and-
and
we
could
settle
on
this
quickly,
my
goal
would
be
like
as
soon
as
the
end
of
next
week,
we've
all
coalesced
around
a
name,
because
there
will
be
obviously
some
changes
in
code
and
and
grunt
worker
involved
here.
I
A
You,
sir
us,
yes,
fantastic!
Okay,
then
we
are
on
to
the
sig
reports
section.
Unless
anybody
has
questions.
E
I
did
just
have
a
quick
question.
I
guess
it
seems
like
we
encountered
this
once
before,
with
replication
controller
and
replica
sets,
although
replica
sets
include
a
slightly
different
concept
and
replication
controller.
In
that
case,
we
didn't
rename
the
existing
thing.
We
made
a
new
thing.
Are
we
going
to
do
the
same
thing
here
with
pet
set,
or
are
we
going
to
try
and
renamed
the
existing
thing?
I
think.
C
Walt
will
start
remains
to
be
determined,
but
the
where
we
did
with
replica
set
lives
done
because
of
a
difference
in
semantics,
but
it
actually
is
causing
some
pain.
So
we
may
end
up
trying
to
make
it
compatible
with
replication
controller.
H
A
E
Can
call
out
what
we
discussed
during
cig
testing
most
recently,
and
that's
just
that
employments
testing.
Is
this
the
kind
of
a
thing
that
doesn't
work
terribly
well,
if
you're
not
using
the
existing
cluster,
stand
up
code.
We're
encountering
this
specifically
in
the
context
of
their
mettle
testing.
E
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
assume
SSH
access
there,
a
lot
of
in
dentists
that
assume
SSH
access
to
either
the
master
node,
and
then
it
assumes
the
master
node
has
a
certain
set
of
components
living
there
or
SSH
access
to
the
other
nodes.
This
is
currently
tied
up
with
the
concept
of
a
cloud
provider.
So,
if
you
use
AWS,
your
key
needs
to
be
where
a
wsss
underscore
SSH
underscore
key
tells
it
to
be,
if
you're
using
google
cloud
and
something
different,
we're
thinking.
This
is
a
little
weird.
E
It
probably
makes
sense
to
either
create
the
concept
of
a
bare-metal
provider
where
SSH
keys
can
be
put
in
known
locations,
it's
sort
of
like
a
deaf
or
starting
more
like
a
nail
or
null
provider,
or
maybe
we
just
untie
the
concept
of
ssh
access
from
providers
entirely
and
pass
that
explicitly
to
the
e2e
best
binary.
But
at
the
moment
it's
really
tough
for
somebody
who's
standing
up
a
bare
metal
cluster
to
actually
verify
that
their
thing
is
conformant.
E
They
have
to
like
tell
the
tests
that
they're
using
some
cloud
providers
so
generally
folks
have
chosen
to
use
AWS
or
something
that
doesn't
have
too
many
constraints
like.
If
you
don't
set
a
cloud
provider,
it
assumes
google
cloud
by
default
and
then
it
seems
you
have
g-cloud
installed
anyway.
These
are
the
sorts
of
things
where
you've
been
discussing
on
a
week
by
week
basis
at
sig
testing.
E
We've
also
been
looking
at
trying
to
get
the
testing
for
the
entire
project
off
of
Jenkins
and
onto
a
Cuban
Eddie's
cluster
I
think
there's
been
a
lot
of
fantastic
blur
work
on
the
test
grid.
It
continues
to
improve
on
a
day-by-day
basis,
and
human
teddy
nadir
is
now
at
the
point
where,
if
you
have
a
failure
on
a
PR,
you
can
click
through
and
it
shows
you
the
exact
indication
you
can
use
to
rerun
the
test.
E
I
Be
happy
to
say
a
couple
of
words:
okay
about
six
scale,
a
quick
admin
note
we've
started
recording
as
a
last
week
we
started
recording
the
sessions
and
we
haven't
actually
post
them
to
a
YouTube
channel
Sarah.
You
and
I've
been
working
out
how
to
do
that.
So
I
think
we'll,
hopefully
get
those
content
where
you
can
see
it.
We
have
been
continuing
to
try
to
take
pretty
good,
didn't
if
you're
interested.
I
I
One
thing
that's
been
going
on
across
a
few
sessions
is
we're
continuing
to
work
on
how
to
do
performance
performance
run,
exchanged
performance
data
exchange
in
a
reasonable
way.
It's
really
hard
to
exchange
data
and
a
standard
way
to
let
people
compare
performance
results.
So
that's
been
kind
of
long-running
thread
that
we're
at
we
need
to
work
on.
I
So
I
guess
the
last
thing
there
I
mentioned
is
there
what
the
nature
of
the
sixth
scale
group
is
is
such
that
it
tends
to
be
a
little
bit
kind
of
broadly
sweeping
across
the
whole
project,
because
you're
never
really
sure
what
part
of
the
system
is
going
to
be
the
most
influential
in
terms
of
total
system
performance.
So
we
frequently
end
up
talking
about
various
topics
that
we
wonder
what
the
impact
will
be.
I
I
think
the
one
that
was
a
biggest
note
from
this
morning
was
the
the
new
big
there's,
a
pretty
sizable
trunki
Intel
proposal,
which
I
think
after
discussion
we
concluded
was
probably
not
that
impactful
to
overall
system
scalability,
but
it's
large
and
interesting
enough.
That
I
think
the
request
would
be.
Can
we
get
in
till
to
give
us
a
short
community
proposal,
presentation
on
on
what
they're
thinking
about
line
so
that'll
do
for
today,
I
think
fantastic.