►
Description
We have PUBLIC and RECORDED weekly video meetings every Thursday at 10am US Pacific Time.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQDIAB0OqiSjIHI8AWMvSdceWhnz56jNpZrLs6o7NJY
This was a special edition Governance meeting with an agenda and notes here -- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TBs00AgIEd2bXMGIyDbZlZodSkVkozHLw8eY5jeg0oA/edit
A
Okay,
good
morning
or
good
local
time,
if
you're,
not
in
pacific
time,
it
today
is
Monday
March
twentieth,
and
this
is
the
Cooper
Nettie's
government
eating
first
of
I
suspect,
a
few
where
we
will
try
to
nail
down
a
good,
solid
governance
structure.
This
meeting
is
going
to
be
recorded
and
will
be
made
public
so
behave
now.
All
of
you,
Jason
and
Brendan
well,.
B
B
B
Sometimes
it
gets
a
little
contentious
and
we'll
keep
that
we
keep
everybody
viewpoint
in
mind
and
make
sure
we're
respectful
analyst
or
stuff
and
I
wanted
to
start
by
giving
it
a
quick
overview
of
the
community
survey
data
because
I
think
everybody's
seen
it
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
it's
worth
revisiting
because
I
think
that
that
sort
of
them,
my
motivation
for
trying
to
drive
this
so
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
here
really
quickly,
and
so
basically
I
wanted
to
start
with
this.
Are
we
trained
sharing
to
hopefully
right
now?
B
Yes,
all
right.
I
wanted
to
start
with
this
graph,
which
was
I'm
able
to
successfully
manage
applications
using
carbon
at
ease.
I
think
is
a
very
clear
indicator
that
we
are
quite
successfully
producing
an
extremely
useful,
bra
I
think
we
should
all
be
very
proud
of
what
we've
achieved
here,
but
when
you
scroll
back
up
to
one
of
the
other
questions
skipping
over
developer
tools,
inches
its
own
cuttlefish,
these
two
questions,
I
think
or
why
we're
here?
The
first
is,
you
know
full-on.
B
Think
that's
a
really
big
problem
and
I
think
that
it
is
shown
in
particular
around
how
understanding
how
precious
decisions
are
made
is
something
that
I
think
I
would
like
to
focus
on
as
the
golden
salt
here.
So
that's
the
first
sort
of
order
of
business
which
is
I.
You
know
I
put
two
candidates
in
here
at
the
beginning
at
the
in
the
agenda
of
these
to
the
as
a
hopeful
outcomes
of
this
meeting
right,
which
is
once
if
an
agreement.
C
B
Define
a
classification
system
for
decisions
effectively
like
is
this
a
big
decision?
Is
this
a
project?
Precision
it's
just
a
peon
decision
like
look
readily,
probably
define
I,
think
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
on
defining
rules
and
a
lot
less
work
on
defining
actually
useful
thing,
which
is
actually.
D
E
E
B
B
Think
part
of
the
challenge
has
been
the
historical
anything
linger
and
go
on
and
on
and
on,
and
because
they
linger
and
go
on
and
on
welcome
back
room
conversations
and
backgrounds
were
licking
and
things
like
that
and-
and
that
leads
to
that
misunderstanding-
I'm
hopeful,
if
we
time
bounded,
that
we
will
actually
allow
everyone
to
participate
and
yet
have
a
really
clear
process.
But
I'm
open
to
saying
like
these
are
the
five
people
or
you
know,
owners
or
whatever
we
want
to
decide,
are
the
people
who
are
going
to
do
these
first.
Two
other.
D
Well,
I
make
inspected
and
central
project
project
issue,
which
is:
who
is
this
against
to
have
to
agree
to
fix
the
point?
You
just
make
a
two-week
a
two-week
down
to
wrap
up
anything
whatever
that
happens
to
be,
you
have
to
actually
agree.
This
is
happening.
Some
consensus
of
some
people,
who's
managed
to
be
free
in
monday
morning.
Good
enough,
is
it
our.
D
B
It's
true
that
the
two
choices
are
either
everyone
who's
involved
here
and
hasn't
made
the
time
and
prioritized
and
I
think
we've
all
I
know
that
other
guys
really
wasn't
randomly
free
right.
I
need
myself
trade.
This
is
important
or
we
go
with
owners
because
that's
the
other,
only
other
established
hierarchy
was
there
that
I
think
this.
So
I
don't
look
like
a
movie,
so.
E
E
We've
been
we've
gone
three
years
of
that
and
we
need
to
change
it,
but
I
think
we
need
to
take
a
step
toward
so
if
it's
a
single
community
representative
set
of
community
representatives
I,
don't
remember,
that's
necessarily
a
challenge
for
us
right
now,
but
I
knew
willing
to
have
a
flexible
group
group
of
people
who
are
not
in
the
owners
file
identified
and
able
to
participate.
I
agree
with
that.
Go.
F
Ahead
so
I
mean
so
one
way
to
approach
this
might
be
to
actually
separate
out
rolls
around
where
the
owners
approvers
will
do
reviewers
and
participants
right
I
think
there
are
people
in
the
community
that
we
definitely
want
to
hear
feedback
to.
We
want
to
take
seriously,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
can't
have,
you
know,
does
the
larger
we
make
this
more
often
we
make
this
more
likely.
F
We
are
to
have
somebody
to
relate
on
the
track
and
be
chosen,
and
so
so
we
need
to
have
a
way
to
actually
sort
of
see
past
that
and
I'm
not
sure
what
that
process
is
or
how
we
decide
to
cut
that
stuff.
I
think
I,
think
the
owner
aspect
is,
is
Brennan
trying
to
drive
this
to
be
try
and
bounded
right.
That's
like
making
sure
that
things
don't
like.
B
I
would
prefer
to
sort
of
start
with,
like
let's
just
force,
people
to
apply
down
on
the
track
that
they're
going
to
lie
down
on
the
tracks
there
and
I
say
like
it's
just
time
down
at
62
weeks
we're
going
to
merchants
two
weeks.
That's
the
first
thing.
People
need
to
lie
down
on
and
then
the
second
thing
is
here's.
The
people
are
going
to
decide
on
those
two
weeks
and
here's
the
process.
I.
F
B
B
C
Let
me
just
throw
something
out
there
and
then
she
start
something
special
is
respected.
This
ad
approver
is
the
audience
right.
At
the
end,
the
day
we
would
want
to
have
either
a
majority
of
super
majority
of
the
approvers
approval
for
the
seven
structures.
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
other
practical
way
to
come
up
the
time
so,
whatever
whatever
we
come
up
with
in
this
time,
bonchon
brain
I
think
that
the
final
final
is
the
lizards
eat.
A
little
bonus
is
that
is
that
something
that
we
can
achieve
consensus
live
is
the
script
I.
G
Yeah
grand
Homme
google
I
have
to
stick
with
all
right
when
I
completely
agree
with
you
about
time
bonding
it,
and
this
is
important
than
people
to
meet
the
time
first
and
if
you
want,
maybe
even
do
a
face
to
face
whatever
just
to
close
on
them
and
having
a
hit
which
this
vigilance
we
are
trying
to
make,
because
it's
very
generic
right
now
they
define
the
pacification,
sensible
decision
and
the
process
Commission,
which
were
ahead
of
the
elders.
The
discussion,
one
of
the
outcome
of
protest
came
this.
G
F
B
F
E
B
E
B
F
I
didn't
have
a
lot
of
open
questions
around
how
we
decide
membership
in
sig
p.m.
we
have
a
good
idea
in
terms
of
with
cigs
and
coding
and
maintain
errs
and
all
that
when
it
comes
to
people
taking
a
leadership
role
in
other
parts
of
the
project,
we
don't
have
a
good
metric
for
who
actually
is
in
an
hour
how
they
actually
prove
themselves
to
be
committed
to
the
project.
All
right.
B
B
C
Just
you
can
agree
to
bring
work
to
drug
contentious.
You
know
we're
not
going
to
have
any
outcome.
That's
edible,
like
so
the
day
when
he
says
that
he
defines
me
that
approval
rates
and
right
now
only
it
was
the
best
thing
we
have
I
mean
it
worked
for
us
pretty
well
edelman,
every
way,
I
think
it's
a
good
set
of
people
understand
the
project
and
really
kind
of
getting
their
bones.
Did
it?
Is
that
because
there's
a
shared
will
do
we
each
other
good
evening,
I'm.
E
J
F
A
I
would
suggest
that
we
add
we
had.
We
talked
a
little
bit
more
like
a
community
or
a
business
side
representative
are
in
addition
to
the
owners,
who
are
more
strictly
technical
and
I
would
write.
I
would
recommend
that
we
say
owners
plus
one
to
two.
People
like
that
and
Brandon
Phillips
comes
to
mind
immediately
as
someone
who
has
been
very
good
at
helping
us
to
find
an
established
processes,
wrangle
people
and
make
good
decisions
across
the
community
and
technology.
F
C
If
you
can
add
value,
you
and
I
think
it's
good
to
have
people
under
the
you
know
like
like
the
approvers
is
just
the
final
step
and
like
it's
largely
going
to
be
all
the
way
to
be
a
lot
of
people,
but
you
know
like
if
they
need
other
people
there.
One
of
the
things
like
mixed.
We
can
say
that
the
boosting
about
those
people
impreza,
would
be
a
great
person
to
do
I
I,
just
don't
think
that
could
be
arbitrary,
I
think
angry.
E
F
Right
so
just
to
be
clear,
I'm
going
to
read
off
the
list
here
just
for
the
books
that
don't
have
it
in
front
of
them.
In
the
approver
section
of
the
top-level
owners
file,
there's
Brian
Brendan
Byrnes
dawn.
Can
me
jovita
from
stl,
because
I
didn't
introduce
myself
earlier,
a
Daniel
lava
lamp,
Clayton,
TM
and
white
heck.
F
D
Hopefully
acknowledge
the
cleanness
of
just
sticking
with
that
list
to
begin
with,
I
seize
it,
and
there
are
no
doubt
advantages
for
a
project
like
this
to
have
warm
up,
perhaps
tighter
consensus
from
a
smaller
different
people
who
know
each
other
would
work
from
each
other.
But
I
feel
like
it's
from
wherever
the
JC
everybody
on
my
group
is
really
define.
E
Let
me
say
said:
I
feel
like
the
goal
would
be
to
ensure
that
everybody
who
gets
a
member
of
the
community
who
participates-
and
he
thinks
today
is
recognized
in
some
official
structure
that
we
can
do.
This
I
think
I
share
the
concern
which
is
I,
don't
think
I
mean.
Maybe
this
is
just
something
we
can
ask.
E
Is
there
anybody
on
this
call
he's
not
in
that
list
to
have
no
intention
of
bringing
people
like
Bob
and
Brandon
and
others
in
the
community
into
the
decision-making
process
sup
about
like
I
would
agree,
but
stars
in
the
perspective
that
everyone
on
that
everyone
that
I
know
of
in
the
book
is
committed
to
doing
this.
Well.
F
E
B
E
B
E
C
F
D
Of
this
meeting
is
going
to
be
completely
different
than
land.
The
notice
of
us
are
published
to
think
we're
discussing
with
us
how
come
on
and
just
create
all
the
people
on
that
list,
including
the
people
were
talking
about
reviewing
I,
have
the
greatest
respect
for
its
really
clear.
They
have
two
projects.
The
projects
good
in
to
start,
but
it
looks
like
like
google
has
definitely
one
majority.
That's
why
I'm
looking
at
rivington
hips
like
as
someone
who
had
more
people
and.
B
Actually
Google
would
end
up
not
one
of
my
dirty
if
we
drop
the
student,
it's
brian
and
him
myself,
Joe
and
Clayton
right
and
I've
been
okay
and
I'd,
be
okay,
saying
actually
in
the
very
first
thing
we're
going
to
do.
Is
we're
going
to
vote
in
to
community
members
like,
and
we
will
time
out
that
so
that
they
get
into
goat
edition
by
Wednesday
I.
Think
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
Okay,.
E
Good
idea,
but
from
a
ratification
point
of
view,
I,
don't
think
anybody
from
google
will
object
to
Google,
not
having
a
supermajority
right
nobody's
casting
aspersions
on
anybody
hears
intentions,
so
we
don't
need
to
waste
time.
You
know
caging
everything
in
terms
of
apologies
so
like
for
the
sake
of
progress.
I
think
this
is
effectively
decided.
Yes,
I'm
particularly
young.
G
Different
kind
of
post
videos
musicales
within
the
community
and
it
wasn't
clear
what
the
decisions
would
be
made
by
the
others,
a
little
deaf
nice
team
for
all
the
decisions
for
us,
because
our
founders
I
can
even
say
about
what
impact
man
is
well-positioned
of
other
things.
So
if,
for
example,
the
elders
will
do
the
classification
right
partisans
or
decisions
and
then
it
will
be
very
gay
today
to
derive
before
I
think
that's
great,
but
we
decide
everything
sure.
B
F
C
So
this
was
just
boost
traffic.
We
just
need
some
success.
We
can
agree
to
approve
the
submission
process
and
like
like
ranaut,
that
group
of
people
has
like,
as
you
start,
email
all
decisions,
this
project
that
dev
embracing
this
should
be
the
best
decisions
kind
of
each
other,
as
did
it
I.
Don't
look
like
to
point
out
that
this
group
of
people
are
the
improvements
they
don't
necessarily
have
to
come
up
with
the
most
welcome
to
choose.
C
Just
maybe
what
we
do
have
a
representational
group
of
people
actually
involved
in
Oh
date
and
the
proposal
right
so
I
think
just
break
into
pieces.
We've
got
several
prove
it.
That's
great.
They
will
find
open
this
again.
You
know
when,
when
we
hit
the
women
is
when
the
clock
goes
and
we
have
to
get
those
web
less.
The
next
thing
is
meet
an
order.
Ideally
one
person
is
going
to
be
the
organizer.
Now
they
don't
like.
C
There
are
in
the
world
products
there'll
be
a
bunch
of
participants
at
work
with,
but
ideally
would
have
to
be
a
one.
Maybe
two
people
who
are
going
to
put
so
much
I've
already
of
a
times
next,
two
weeks,
putting
the
strangled
up
Jim,
the
first
of
all,
to
agree
that
we
need
an
odor
and
second
of
all,
who
was
a
person
be
so.
E
Brian
has
been
working
on
this
PR
community,
286
I,
think,
which
I
think
is
trying
to
capture
sort
of
all
of
the
decisions
in
cocoa
and
has
garnered
a
million
comments
and
brian
has
had
pleaded
for
somebody
else
to
help.
So
I
offered
this
morning
to
him
to
help
get
to
take
over
that
PR
and
try
to
wrangle
the
rest
of
the
community
feedback,
because
we
object
that
would.
C
C
C
But
now
I
think
the
first
you
know
point
of
water
would
be
to
identify
an
owner.
It's
going
to
establish.
You
know
a
proposal
around
the
scope
of
the
set
workin,
mall
working
meetings,
etc,
and
then
participants
who
are
committed
to
working
with
that
owner
as
a
you
know,
like
a
significant.
The
next
two
weeks
resulted
I.
Think.
E
F
B
F
B
C
I
think
starting
it
when
we're
not
contested
with
kook
on
the
other
things
work,
the
second
pieces,
it's
probably
going
to
be
beneficial
to
have
some
of
the
mount
of
time
together
hold
of
the
working
group
to
I
should
be
able
to
meet
face
to
face
and
crush
excuse
as
a
group.
So
you
know
whoever
the
owner
is,
which
is
movers,
Tim
I
think
it'd
be
nice
to
be
able
to
bring
other
participants
together
with
him.
You
know
over
the
two
weeks
to
kind
of
work
through
issues.
Subdivide
the
efforts
to
the
documentation.
B
Should
go
ahead
and
I
suppose
that
would
either
talkative.
I
would
really
like
to
encourage
us
to
split
this
into
two
and
plan
on
opening
two
owners
or
whatever,
but
I
really
was.
I
think
the
split
that
I
we
outlined
at
the
beginning
of
like
the
classifications
for
decisions
and
then
the
process
for
decisions
are
two
totally
parallelizable
separate
subjects
and
we'll
have
more
effectively
try
not
to
combine
it
together
and
we
plan
on
circle,
so
I
do
think.
F
That
we
need
to
essentially
have
a
statement
in
terms
of
how
do
we
actually
split
decision
making
between
cigs
and
a
larger
part
of
the
the
community
I
mean
I.
If
I
can
zoom
in
on
this
just
very
quickly,
when
I
first
proposed
six
I
thought
it
was
just
a
way
to
sort
of
have
some
conversations
before
things
were
percentage
of
the
larger
group
I.
Never
you
know
and
again
things
more
orphanage.
B
C
G
I'm
handle
okay,
my
advice,
I
stripping.
You
know
the
states
are
amazing,
so
maybe
it's
a
testament
by
mistake.
This
is
this
is
great
I
think
when
Ryan
Carson
listen
in
if
Ellis,
to
actually
capture
how
it's
working
today,
and
I
also
want
to
feel
more
plans
to
define
everything
from
said
just
come
on
working
well.
So
if
you
can
the
first
18
positions,
deliveries
house
think
I'm
working
today
how
we
are
making
decisions,
works,
working
and
then
identify
where
it's
not
working.
I
know.
B
Like
I
would
really
like
to
not
capture
what
we're
doing
today.
Great
is
a
total.
It's
a
total
waste
of
time
right,
like
the
figure
2
working,
fine
and
that's
a
great
right.
So
the
extent
of
capturing
over
today
is
I,
think
Layton
frowny
on
me,
but
I
when
she
going
am
in
a
lot
of
time
on
what
it
is,
is
late,
Veloz,
a
great
you
can
do
your
spinning,
whatever
that's
fine,
but
we
have
effectively
Mayo
process
or
they
know
knows
that
thing
can't
be
decided
in
fig.
B
It
needs
to
come
back
to
the
product
level
project
clinical
decision,
so
we
think
we
find
it
to
the
extent
of
capturing
today
we
should
say
it's
like
hey.
You
know
what
whatever
is
going
on
in
six
days
in
this
big
enough
grace,
but
we
need
to
have
this
decision
to
find
to
win.
We
bring
picks
back
up
and
when
we
bringing
things
back
up,
you
don't
have
a
process.
We
don't
have
it
something
we
can
capture
today.
Right
I
feel.
E
I
think,
like
I,
do
any
drugs
in
a
bit
security
or
kind
of
specific
reading,
while
disagreeing
was
I.
Think
that
capturing
the
current
state
is
really
important
for
people
who
are
outside
the
community
or
in
King
themselves
to
how
the
community
works
and
in
that
aspect,
I
think
having
a
document
said:
hey
here's
our
expectations,
like
the
contributor
expectation,
stuff
kind
of
just
drop
like
it's
a
that's.
The
process
owner
also
owns
defining
with
that
high
level
process.
We
swim
these
sections
down,
but
I
do
it
is
important
to
convey
that
and.
G
The
reason
I
think
it's
important,
because
there
are
also
some
learning
randa
hear.
You
say
that
there
was
no
process,
but
actually
the
work
on
process
also
healthy
for
supposing
for
back
and
how
they
should
be.
If
this
transparency
into
what's
going
on
and
it
didn't
work
right.
So
we
need
you
can
go
and
start
from
scratch.
G
B
Of
that,
in
fact,
I
think
that
the
point
is
that
I
think
each
table
address
on
process
and,
if
we
say,
engage
big
donor
each
get
syndrome
like
you
need
to
define
your
process,
that's
great
and
that's
a
good
out.
So
I
think
that
the
part
we
want
to
destroy
is
the
part
that
never
existed
anyway,
which
is
well.
How
do
we
figure
out
something
for
higher
level
students?
Yes,.
E
So
I
agree
with
the
latter
part
of
your
statement.
I
think
the
first
part
of
your
statement,
Rendon,
can
be
debated
whether
things
should
have
a
conforming
procedure
like
for
making
decisions
or
whether
we
should
let
them
get
your
own
free
think
we
can
decide
that
we
don't
in
line
it
right
here.
I
think
the
second
part
of
you
know
who
gets
to
make.
What
decision
is
a
reasonable
thing
to
try
to
capture
now
I've
been
taking
notes
on
all
the
things.
E
E
E
Went
through
that
document
and
every
single
person
who
has
an
objection
to
a
particular
line,
we
just
strike
that
out
and
we
leave
everything.
That's
there
and
check
that
and
I
think
that
accomplishes
what
I
was
mostly
trying
to
get
ad,
which
was
like
I,
don't
think
it's
very
hard
for
three
or
four
of
us
to
sit
down
and
go
through
every
line
and
say
we
don't
agree,
let's
remove
it
with
on
the
green
room
and.
E
Wall
I
commit
to
I
will
take
Brian's
document,
I'll
put
it
in
a
Google,
Doc
and
I'll
get
the
people
who
are
most
concerned
about
that.
You
Joe,
you
ended
probably
at
Brian
and
wall
or
both
sit
down
and
we'll
go
through
strike.
Every
line,
and
what's
left
in
theory,
has
enough
weight
to
say
we're
safe,
that's
rare
the
brand.
You
want
to
continue
specifically
to
codify
what
we're
doing
today.
Right,
which
means
the
bulk
of
that
document
is
not
actually
be
stricken
is
like
somebody,
forty.
K
E
For
assigned
names
with
never
formalised
letter
me
as
we're
iterating
on
this
ladders
idea,
we
broke
up
things
beneath
this
today
in
the
multiple
steps
to
make
it
more
progressive.
All
right
now
I
equal,
I
feel
like
if
we
can
get
four
of
us
to
agree
on
that,
then
we're
in
a
reasonable
state
for
saying
what's
left
is
capable
and
useful,
and
then
we
can
move
on
so
ten
years
old
on
the
morph
on
this
one.
What
I'm
good
will.
J
B
E
K
I
agree
that
process
is
important.
I
will
just
point
out
as
people
most
people
see
Norma
to
discuss
organizations
so
like.
If
you
look
at
all
the
proposals,
they're
mostly
centered
around
how
to
structure
rather
than
comical
so
I.
The
only
agree
that
we
also
need
to
pay
attention
to
the
process
that
I
don't
give
them
is
in
conflict.
Necessarily,
I
have
to
work
on
both
know.
J
Don't
know
I
didn't
forget,
I,
think
that
adding
progress
is
good,
but
we
also
need
to
add
visibility
because
I
think
a
lot
of
people
and
is
reflected
in
the
survey.
It
was
people
don't
actually
see
what's
happening.
So
if
people
see
what's
happening,
they're
going
to
take
more
of
an
interest
in
it
because
they
actually
have
the
capability
to
interact
with
it.
So
it's
hardly
process,
but
it's
also
visibility.
So
writing
a
bunch
of
your
rules
doesn't
help
if
there's
no
over
oversight
or
accountability.
Licensable.
Just
so
I
understand.
F
E
I'm
completely
in
agreement
with
that,
philosophically,
from
a
like
getting
code
or
docs
reviewed
point
of
view,
having
five
dots
or
ten
Docs
is
x,
less
reviewable
than
having
to
singled
off.
So
I
would
propose
procedurally
that
we
have
a
single
doc
that
is
broken
up
into
sections,
which
logically,
are
independent
docs
that
allows
us
to
move
information
and
ideas
between
sections
without
having
to
open
up
different
file,
different
gifts
and
being
able
to
make
those
comparisons.
Okay,.
B
F
B
F
H
Spective
of
documenting
what
the
process
currently
is,
whether
we
like
it
or
not
or
agree
with
it
or
not,
I
think
a
temple
to
capture.
Just
from
going
back
to
the
survey
and
saying
you,
people
want
to
know
how
things
are
being
done,
even
if
it's
not
something
we're
happy
with
and
so
documenting,
what's
there
and
putting
it
in
a
section
that
says
this
is
what's
currently
happening
and
we're
not
happy
with
everything,
and
this
should
be
taken
as
like.
H
E
H
E
Go
to
jail
and
Brenda
this
point
about
putting
too
much
weight
on
the
way
we
do
things
already.
I
think
that
there's
just
the
tension
between
if
we
can't
capture
what
we're
doing
now
and
then
have
a
process
in
place
that
moves
us
from
that
we're
going
to
fail
anyway,
right
so
like
if
we
can
strip
down
the
what
we're
doing
down
to
the
non-contentious
thing
that
gets
leaked,
our
little
dress
you
transition
within
the
direction,
I.
F
Think
that
it's
impossible
want
to
write
down
what
we
do
now
without
idea,
liking.
It
and
Sarah
I'm
apologize
for
what
I'm
about
to
say
here,
because
it's
somewhat
inflammatory
I
think
that
the
ways
our
current
process
worse
is
that
people
argue
until
exhaustion
until
somebody
gives
up
a
lot
of
stuff
happens
and
cigs
and
it
gets
checked
in
without
wider
review.
And
then
we
all
deal
with
it.
Release
time
and
yet
came
to
vanadis
was
still
succeeding
and
I.
E
F
To
call
attention
to
the
fact
that
when
Brendan
presented
edge
chart
those
were
people
who
responded
to
Cooper
Nettie's
survey
right,
there's
there's
there
is
a
built-in
sampling
bias
there.
When
you're
asking
the
wider
community
community
resting
the
people
that
are
any
career
in
any
juicers,
not
the
folks
that
actually
said
I
don't
get
so
we
could
be
succeeding.
10X
is
more,
and
I'm
going
to
be
giving
a
talk
about
that.
If
you
come
exactly.
D
I,
don't
hire
the
ingredients
chairs
comments
their
spot
on
whether
they're,
inflammatory
or
not,
I
think
there's
funny,
and
the
current
process
is
so
at
a
POC
and
so
based
on
personal
relationships
and
knowing
whether
fast
mom
or
dad
that
for
permission
to
ice
cream
for
tonight
that
I
really
are
trying
to
document
all
that
is
just
going
to
be
an
exercise
in
frustration.
So.
J
Can
I
make
a
suggestion,
instead
of
trying
to
document
the
process
that
we
some
the
risks
that
we
all
agree
upon
in
the
crime
process,
so
I
mean
as
a
corner
of
fig
closed
drop.
A
huge
risk
I
see
is
the
fact
that
there
is
no
cross-cutting
ops
visibility
for
across
the
project.
We
lots
of
things.
Lopsy
things
happen
in
op
stirring
in
cygwin.
We
don't
have
any
disability,
that's
a
huge
problem.
B
H
C
H
E
Again,
like
I,
didn't
want
to
bring
it
up
at
the
content
like
it's
just
really
trying
to
say
like
that,
did
help.
Every
person
who
contributes
to
the
product
today
must
contribute,
and
so,
as
a
result
like
I
want
to
release,
have
something
that
anchored
that,
in
the
reality
of
what
we're
doing
call
out
all
the
flaws,
call
it
all
the
gaps,
a
lot
of
ugly
things
and
make
that
be
an
input.
Not
the
only
getting
close
to
the
next
page
does.
J
M
M
You
know
a
large
number
of
lines
that
need
to
be
stricken
from
that
document.
The
contributor
ladder
is,
although
it's
not
autumn
it
and
I
agree,
there
is
no
process
for
how
you
become
any
of
those
roles
which
is
in
rather
frustrating
as
a
person
who
is
not.
You
know
an
employee
of
Google,
red
hat
or
Microsoft
arm,
but
these
document
itself
is
pretty
good
and
I.
Think
that
I
mean
to
brendans
point
that
there
are,
you
know,
only
a
couple,
actual
formal
structures.
We
have
well
in
formal
structures
that
we
have.
M
We
have
the
individual
contributors,
we
have
the
figs
and
you
have
our
you
know
our
sort
of
Neville
and
dictators
who
are
the
top
level
owners
files
and
a
process
or
in
efforts
to
to
codify
their
formal
structure
and
also
how
they
relate
to
each
other,
not
necessarily
how
to
classify
every
decision,
but
the
process
by
which
decisions
are
escalated
from
an
individual
contributor
to
at
the
worst
case,
all
the
way
up
to
the
benevolent
dictators
through
the
cigs,
because
I
don't
imagine
anyway.
That's
where
our
imagining
that
this
isn't
some
house
kick
well.
M
F
M
Obviously,
yes,
sir
I
will
yes
communication.
Invisibility
I.
Think,
are
you
know
traditional
project
to
management,
to
program
management,
kind
of
roles,
and
you
don't
have
a
large
number
of
people
who
are
focused
on
doing
that.
We
have
not
and
I
think
one
of
the
important
outcomes
of
this
process
would
be
to
define
what
a
what
the
PM
group
is
supposed
to
be
doing
in
order
to
improve
communication
and
visibility
or
not,
you
can
outsource
communication.
2
p.m.
I
mean
it.
Thank
you
we're
trying
to
outsource
your
question.
2
p.m.
but
you
know
the
klieg.
E
I
disagree
with
repetition,
love
them.
I
was
going
to
say
nothing
about
for,
like
Bob's
point
about
cross-cutting
big
issues.
We
establish
cigs
in
Crete,
cross-cutting
issues.
We
have
cigs
that
are
focused
on
functional
areas
and
we
have,
we
have
cigs
are
focused
on
use
cases
and
driving
features,
save
some
of
those.
But
what
we
really
don't
have
is
half
of
the
classification
of
positions
should
sing
ops
or
sitting
TM,
get
to
make
a
decision
about
something
and
encourage
others,
eggs
and
power
data
in
that
loop.
B
Exactly
I
think
that,
basically,
this
notion
of
like
we
need
to
set
up
the
rules,
not
so
we
need
to
define
like
if
two
cigs,
both
things
I
on
it.
Well,
clearly,
maybe
that's
a
project
level
position
or
if
three
sig
don't
think
that
that
fiction
out,
like
I,
think
they're
there
any
places
where
we
need
to
understand
how
you
break
something
out
of
a
sib
local
decision.
Even
if
that
signal
on
a
theater,
yeah
broken
out
so.
K
Slowly
and
painfully
everyone
primary
can,
we
just
all
agree
to
have
Clayton
do
the
retrospective
and
Joe
has
particular
cases
where
he
feels
like
the
current
process
work
down.
We
left
us
to
get
to
the
retrospective
course.
There
were
eight
cases
where
Joe
is
team.
Is
the
current
treasurer
doesn't
work?
Then
they.
E
C
F
Okay,
Oh
kind
of
for
the
new
thing,
I
guess
I
I'm
happy
to
actually
go
through,
like
you
know
the
government
stock
that
we
have
now
and
just
take
that
as
it
is
and
see
if
we
can
pare
it
down
to
assess
and
some
stuff
that
we
carry
on
awesome,
I'm
doing
that
you
you
own
I'll,
do
that
with
you
as
I!
Won't.
E
F
K
B
I
would
like
to
get
to
a
concrete
set
of
things
that
we
have
agreed
on.
Is
the
outcome
of
the
meeting
so
that
we
can
get
it
back
to
the
community
and
so
that
we
can
make
our
export.
It
seems
to
me
that
we
have
agreed
that
the
improvers
for
any
of
these
processes
that
we're
going
to
formalize
our
owners
point
one
in
Egyptian,
subset
of
others.
Sorry
for
the
subset
of
owners
correct.
Do
we
want
to
elect
into
community
representatives
of
the
procession
or
do
we
want
to
know.
E
C
B
Good
for
people,
you
repeat
the
last
one
basic
list
is
how
you
make
decisions
and
I
can
have
the
comment
that
we
want
to
capture
what
was
going
well
with
the
cigs,
and
so
we
want
to
post
have
the
how
we
currently
make
decisions
in
this
thing,
so
we
feel
like
maybe
working
well
as
well
as
the
new.
This
is
how
he
makes
project-level
decisions
that
we
agreed.
Basically
don't
exist,
we're
okay
and
we're
going
to
try
and
bounce
it.
B
I
propose
two
weeks
that
I
propose,
starting,
let's
say
starting
from
April
center,
or
something
like
that.
We
will
follow
the
prop
tax
day
and
that
work
so
starting
april
seven.
It
is
so
April
senators
the
first
day
april.
Twenty
first
will
be
the
clothes
and
we'll
have
basically
an
admission
of
a
time-bound
on
comments
before
that.
So
I
don't
know,
maybe
three
days
before
the
close.
The
final
approvers
vote
is
the
time
found
on
community
comments.
We.
E
B
E
C
Going
to
be
more
like
nothing,
the
benefit
to
gonna
need
to
close
and
saw
dork,
and
I
actually
just
crying
through
this,
and
ideally
as
made
of
the
owners
as
present
as
possible
to
immediately
cycle
and
again
feedback
would
be
great
sure.
I
would.
I
would
strongly
recommend
like
week
somewhere
like
mountain
view
or
san
francisco,
and
just
get
people
in
the
room
and
growing
it
through.
Okay,.
B
B
E
E
E
E
C
This
week,
47
g
and
like
such
like
organized
meetings
in
the
week
before
17
Capri
work
that
he
could
attend,
so
we're
going
to
start
their
work
a
month
tuna.
No,
let's
get
the
meeting
schedule,
so
we
do
17
I'd,
like
will
close
it
out
the
last
three
days,
one-handed
ultrazone,
it's
on
the
Redis
message.
Yet
on
how
the
dr
hon,
I
think.