►
From YouTube: 2020-15-10 KEDA Standup
Description
A
Hey
all
sorry
about
that
honor
deny
where
a
customer
called
it.
We
were
trying
to
wrap
up
quickly
but
didn't
want
to
close
too
shortly.
I
see
the
recording
has
started.
I
I
don't
mean
to
interrupt.
If
we
were
started
tom,
anyone
did
we
did
we
start
anything
or
should
we
just
get
going.
C
All
right
thank.
A
You
and
I'm
seeing
okay,
I
was
hoping
aaron
was
actually
gonna
join
this,
but
maybe
I'll
give
a
side
update
on
his
stuff
all
right.
Let
me
open
up
the
agenda
and
share
my
screen
and
we
will
get
right
into
it.
Apologies
again,
it's
been
a
a
hectic
morning
for
better
for
worse.
A
Okay,
all
right!
So
we
have
the
agenda.
Oh
yeah.
This
is
actually
media
agenda,
so
welcome
everyone,
since
we're
a
little
late.
I
still
actually
want
to
give
the
chance,
because
I
do
see
some
names
here-
that
I
don't
recognize
as
well.
So
maybe
we'll
do
very
brief
introductions
in
onrid
and
ahmed
and
su
yoshi
don't
feel
offended.
But
for
the
sake
of
time,
I'm
going
to
introduce
you
all
for
you.
A
So
I'm
jeff,
I'm
one
of
the
maintainers
for
cada
program
manager
on
the
azure
serverless
team,
and
we
have
a
few
other
folks
from
microsoft
as
well,
who
are
all
involved
in
help
with
decatur
project,
there's
ahmed
al-saeed,
honor,
guard
and
suyoshi.
So
those
four
of
us
were
on
pretty
regularly
so
let's
go
through
and
just
make
sure
the
rest
are
there.
I
see
tom
is
connecting
to
audio
still.
So
I'm
just
gonna
call
out
folks
on
the
list.
I
see
them.
Richard
copen,
you
wanna,
do
a
quick
intro.
D
Hi
everyone
thank
you.
Jeff
preshow,
that
my
name's
richard
coppin,
I'm
the
developer
experience
lead
for
ibm,
mq,
I'd
like
to
introduce
you
to
jess
and
callum
who
also
on
the
line
over
the
last
few
weeks,
we've
been
sort
of
looking
at
cada,
jess
and
and
kind
of
joined
us
as
new
graduate
hires
and
they've,
been
looking
at
cada
with
a
small
team
and
have
put
together
a
candidate
scaler
for
ibm
nq
we'd
love
to
share
that
with
you
really
excited
what
we've
done.
A
A
Yes,
yes
as
important
as
the
merch
is,
though,
as
you
can
see
here
these.
These
are
the
critical
questions
awesome
well.
Thank
you
all
so
much
for
joining
shubham
I'll.
Let
you
go
next.
F
A
A
Yes-
and
I
got
an
email
the
other
day
asking
if
I
wanted
to
nominate
incredible
people
in
the
cncf
civilian
neck
and
I'm
not
gonna
lie
that
your
name
was
the
first
one
that
came
up
so
we'll
see
what
happens.
Maybe
tom
can
nominate
you
as
well
and
you
can
get
some
nice
recognition
so
an
understatement
introduction
jess
callum.
I
know
you
kind
of
got
pseudo
introduced
by
richard.
If
anything
else
you
want
to
add,
or
we
get
to
just
jump
into
the
agenda.
C
No
wait:
that's
cool
we're
good
to
go
ahead.
A
A
Maybe
it's
not
well
I'll.
Introduce
tom
tom
works
at
codeit.
He
is
also
a
maintainer,
does
quite
a
bit
for
cada
and
open
source
in
general.
He
has
some
other
open
source
projects
too.
Okay,
oh
yep
tom!
Are
you
there
yeah?
Sorry?
A
G
A
A
Oh
no
worries
wow
see.
This
is
why
tom
is
is
amazing.
Dedication
tom,
we
bumped
your
merch
down
a
little
bit
because
we're
going
to
talk
some
about
ibm
mq,
but
let's
go
for
the
most
important
topic
which
we
punted
till
today.
Well,
not
punted.
We
scheduled
we
have
the
k-2.0
release
candidate.
Thank
you
so
much
tom
for
getting
that
release
out
the
door.
It's
been
used.
A
I've
seen
healthy
conversation
on
slack
as
well
as
github,
and
even
some
on
my
email
about
some
of
the
k2o
stuff
we
wanted
to
checkpoint
in
the
stand
up
about.
Are
we
ready
to
push
this
thing
as
the
default
version?
Potentially
even
later
this
month?
I
guess
I'll
pause
there
and
let
folks
chime
in
on,
if
there's
any
blocking
issues
or
pending
issues
or
discussion,
points
that
would
help
us
make
that
decision.
B
Yeah,
if
I
may
add
something,
I
guess
that
we
have
like
received
bunch
of
contributions
since
the
rc
was
out,
so
there
are
a
couple
of
new
new
prs
merged
in
and
I
guess
there
is
one
one
blocking
issue
which
is
which
is
related
to
the
skilled
jobs.
It's
like
some
memory
memory
problems,
so
sushi
said
he
will
look
at
it.
So
basically
I
think
that
once
once
this
one
yeah
this
is
this
is
the
one
yeah.
So
once
this
one
is,
is
merged
or
like
fixed,
we
can.
B
We
can
probably
release
like
rc2,
probably
something
like
that
and
just
give
it
a
few
few
days
maybe
a
week,
and
then
we
are
good
to
go
with
the
with
the
final
release.
That's
mine,
that's
my
opinion.
A
Make
sense
yeah
I
saw
the.
I
saw
the
chatter
around
the
memory
leak
and
I
was
surprised
so
I'm
glad
at
least
we
narrowed
it
down
to
scale
jobs
being
the
the
potential
spot
where
the
memory
consumption
is
happening.
So
that's
good
yeah.
It
would
be
great
to
to
fix
this
before.
The
final
is
out:
okay,
yeah.
A
I
think
that
makes
sense,
given
that
like
this,
whatever
change
here
might
have
some
impact
and
so
kind
of
the
proposal
on
the
table
which
which
I
would
agree
with
as
well,
but
I'm
open
to
conversation,
which
is
we
closed.
This
issue
as
well,
as
you
know,
we
we
did
merge
in
a
few
pr's
recently
as
soon
as
mentioned,
so
we
kind
of
take
the
status
of
those
in
those
net
new
prs.
We
do
a
quick
rc2,
which
is
kind
of
hey
we
want
to.
We
want
to
double
check.
A
To
make
sure
nothing
is
is
is
off
before
we
make
this
the
default
and
then
from
there
like,
potentially,
if
all
that
happens
in
the
next
week
a
week
from
now
so
on
the
22nd,
we
could
have
a
similar
conversation
and
see
if
rc2
went
well
enough
and
we
want
to
go
from
there.
Does
that
sound
fair
to
everyone?
Any
questions
concerns
yoshi.
I
know
you're
on
the
call.
Are
you
good
with
that
plan.
H
Yeah
this
is
yeah
gcp
scala
with
he.
He
he
did
a
detailed
report
on
the
slack
and
yeah.
It
is
probably
memory
leak,
yeah
right,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
do
the
profiling
and
yeah
reproduce
it.
I
H
I
G
There
are
also
some
people
are
having
issues
with
scale
down
to
zero.
I
think,
but
I'm
checking
if
it's
related
to
the
the
cooldown
not
being
configured
or
just
using
scale
it
and
doesn't
support
it,
but
I
don't
think
that
would
be
a
blocker
which
we
can
easily
fix
after
2.0.
A
A
They
found
tom's
email
somehow
and
they
just
immediately
emailed
tom
and
they're,
like
hey
we're,
having
issues
with
cada,
and
then
tom
was
like,
oh
by
the
way,
there's
a
few
folks
at
microsoft
who
might
be
able
to
help
you
as
well
but
yeah
they
were,
they
were
saying
they
were
having
they
weren't,
seeing
the
cool
down
period
being
honored
at
the
time,
though
they
were
at
v1.
A
A
I
have
to
build
a
cada
demo
for
kubecon
for
the
microsoft
booth
anyway,
maybe
I'll
I'll
play
with
that
and
just
do
some
smoke
test
validation
that
I'm
not
seeing
the
same
issue:
okay,
that's
great,
yeah
and
and
I'll
I'll
keep
an
eye
I'll
try
to
keep
an
eye
on
this
issue.
I
wonder
if
I
can
notify
for
updates
just
on
this
one.
A
Just
that
sometimes
memory
leaks
can
be
a
real
pain
in
the
butt
to
define,
and
so,
if
this
ends
up
being
extensive,
we'll
have
to
we'll
we'll
do
what
we
can.
I
guess.
A
Okay,
it
looks
like
I'm
already
getting
notifications
for
this
issue,
so
anything
else
on
k
to
2.0
that
folks
want
to
cover
okay
roadmap
review
tom.
I
believe
this
is
yours.
I
know
I
have
an
email
that
I
don't
think
I've
opened
yet
around
this.
Is
there
a
repo
here
any
do
you
just
want
to
talk
about
it?
What's
the
best
way
to
talk
about
the
roadmap
stuff.
G
G
The
alternative
approach
is
to
create
a
dedicated
roadmap
repo
so
that
we
have
a
clear
separation
of
the
roadmap
and
planning,
and
then
the
technical
implementation
issues
and
the
bugs
to
clearly
separate
them,
but
I'm
pretty
flexible,
so
would
be
good
to
have
feedback
on
that
and
then
the
next
step
would
be
to
really
add
all
the
roadmap
items.
This
side
to
which
we
want
to
commit
and
yeah
take
it
from
there.
A
Yeah,
this
looks
great
tom.
I
actually
did.
I
did
open
this
email
because
I
actually
know
I
have
looked
through
this
so
yeah
for
folks
who
saw,
as
I
shared
my
screen,
if
you
go
to
the
keto
repo
and
projects,
there
is
this
road
map
here.
Where
is
this
open
for
anyone
to
create
proposals
right
now,
or
is
this
kind
of
restricted
to
owners,
and
we
can
pull
specific
issues
that
we
feel
like
are
big
enough
to
warrant
showing
up
on
the
roadmap.
G
A
G
A
Great
great
yep,
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
This
looks
good
and
I
know
in
one
of
the
areas
we're
maybe
going
to
talk
about
this
week,
but
maybe
we'll
do
in
two
weeks
is
some
of
the
cloud
advocates
at
microsoft
have
actually
been
building
some
pocs
around
first-class
http,
based
scaling
that
I
know
they
reviewed
with
honored
and
ahmed
earlier
this
week
that
they
were
gonna
to
bring
up
it
to
stand
up
and
potentially
open
up
a
pull
request
there.
So
I
think
this
is
good.
A
A
Yeah
I'm
open
to
either.
I
think
the
way
you've
set
it
up
now
and
kind
of
how
you
described
where
it's
a
little
bit
manual,
but
we
have
some
filth
or
some
tags
at
least
to
help
us
guide
us
in
which
ones
we
should
add.
I
I
think
we
could
go
with
this
for
a
bit
and
if
we
find
out
it's
too
cumber
summer,
we're
leaving
things
behind,
we
could
look
at
doing
a
separate
roadmap
one,
but
this
looks
like
a
great
first
stab
at
it.
So
thanks
tom.
G
Okay,
I
have
to
drop
now,
but
I'll
I'll
check
the
notes
afterwards.
A
Okay,
see
you
later
bye,
okay,
great
any
other
comments
or
questions
or
thoughts
on
roadmap.
Before
we
move
on
to
the
next
item
cool
this
one
might
be
pretty
short,
I
think
it
impacts
the
american
folks
the
most.
So
I
don't
even
know
where
all
day
life
savings
come
into
factor
right
now
we
are
meeting
at
this
time
which,
for
me,
is
nine
o'clock
a.m.
Pacific
daylight
time
come
november.
I
believe
it
changes
all
the
time
I
think.
A
On
november
1st,
all
the
clocks
will
move
back
an
hour
and
so
right
now
would
actually
be
eight
o'clock
in
the
morning.
I
know
last
time,
daylight
savings
happened.
We
bumped
the
meeting
out
an
hour
so
that
it
stayed
at
9
00
a.m,
but
it
would
become
an
hour
later
for
everybody
whose
clocks
don't
change.
Is
that
right?
Am
I
thinking
about
this
correctly?
A
No,
maybe
it's
the
other
way
around.
I'm
sorry,
I
get
confused.
It
is
fall
back.
So
right
now
would
be
eight
o'clock
yeah.
I
know
it
would
be
an
hour
later.
I'm
sorry
I'm
I'm
confused,
but
I
know
we
also
move
this
time
before,
and
so
I
think
I
just
wanted
to
have
a
question
here
which
is
like
what
should
we
do
with
the
stand-up
time
coming
that
daylight
savings
is
coming
shortly
after
our
next
stand-up?
A
Do
we
keep
it
where
it's
at
and
folks
who
have
daylight
savings
need
to
adjust
and
join
at
8?
Am
do
we
bump
it
an
hour
later,
but
then
folks
have
to
join
an
hour
later
any
thoughts,
and
I'm
also
still
hesitant
that
I
actually
have
the
math
right
here
of
what
happens
on
daylight
savings
to
everyone
else,
just
because
I'm
talking
and
thinking
at
the
same
time
so
I'll
pause
there
any
general
thoughts
or
votes,
especially,
I
guess
honorary
I'd,
be
curious
on
your
take
of
what
works.
B
If
I
may
jeff
a
little
bit,
I
guess
the
main
problem
is
that
we
like
in
europe
or,
for
example,
in
chicago
we
have
the
they
like.
They
like
saving
time,
like
probably
like
a
week
or
two
sooner
than
in
the
us.
So
this
is.
B
I
So
so,
if
that
is
the
case,
then
probably
we
just
adjust
and
it'll
adjust
for
both
of
us
right.
I
If
you
don't
fall
on
that,
then
we
may
not
even
have
a
meeting
or
we
can
even
skip
a
meeting
if
required.
But
but
just
my
preferences
to
like
eight
o'clock
is
a
little
bit
early.
So
for
me
personally
so
especially
with
you
know,
you
know
with
all
the
coverage
and
yeah.
I
Yeah,
that's
the
time
when
kids
are
getting
ready
for
classes
so
yeah.
So
so,
if
it
turns
out
that
even
europe
has
actually
has
daylight
savings
and
they
are
falling
in
the
same
way,
then
then
I
I
guess
we
can,
I
think
it
still.
It
looks
like
it.
We
can
still
coordinate
right
and
keep.
B
It,
yes,
I
I
think
that
like
personally
for
me,
I
don't
I
don't
mind
like
starting
one
hour
sooner,
so
it's
okay
for
me
to
to
stay
on
the
same
same
time
to
be
convenient
for
you.
A
Okay
and
sorry,
I
think
it's
actually
1700
utc
is
what
we'd
be
proposing,
so
we
would
shift
with
that.
It
actually
makes
you
feel
better
yeah
daylight
savings
is
such
a
weird
thing
that
I'm
like
I
don't
know
how
unique
this
is
so
they've
been
like.
I
feel
good
at
least
that
your
clocks
are
moving.
I
don't
know
all
the
other
parts
of
the
world
that
are
on
the
call.
A
I
don't
know
what
vote
you're
in,
but
I
think
right
now
we're
looking
at
saying,
hey
right
now
we're
meeting
at
1600
utc
after
november.
First,
we
might
actually
move
this
to
start
being
at
1700
utc
so
that
more
or
less
it's
still
the
same
time,
if
you
had
daylight
savings,
so
it's
still
9
a.m.
For
me,
it's
still
whatever
midnight
for
zivian,
but
we
would
shift
it
there.
A
B
All
right,
I
think
if
I
made
something
to
this
topic,
I
discussed
this
with
with
tom
before
about
moving
the
the
stand
up
to
another
day
in
the
week
sure,
because
tom
told
me
that
he
will
be
like
probably
like
very
busy
next,
like
a
couple
of
first
days,
maybe
like
for
the
rest
of
the
rest
of
the
year.
So
I
was
thinking
about
moving
it
to
tuesday,
because
on
first
day
there
is
the
cncf.
B
Serverless
is
meeting
the
same
time
that
we
are
meeting,
and
the
other
point
is
that,
like
we
are
discussing
the
releases
so
like.
Usually
we
like
agree
on
the
release
on
first
day
and
then
we
are
doing
the
release
on
friday,
so
which
is
not
very
good.
So
if
we,
if
we
meet
on
tuesday,
we
can
discuss
on
tuesday
and
then
we
can
release
on
on
wednesday
or
whatever.
So
this
is
just
the
proposal
if
it
is
convenient
for
you
guys
like
meet
the
same
time
on
tuesday.
I
Yeah,
it
doesn't
matter
to
me
personally,
but
I'm
just
curious,
but
friday
would
not
be
because
then
it'll
be
friday
night
for.
A
I
know
yeah,
I
think
tuesday
works
well
for
me.
Actually,
so
why
don't
we
do
that?
Then?
I
think
that
makes
sense
and
yeah
we.
I
I
do
miss
100
of
these
serverless
sig
cncf
groups,
because
it
conflicts
with
this
meeting,
which
is
fine.
I
like
this
meeting
more
no
offense
to
doug
on
from
ibm
who
I
love
dearly
but
yeah.
Why
don't
we
do
that?
Both
then
we
can.
A
We
can
move
to
tuesdays
and
also
adjust
the
time
starting
on
november
3rd,
so
yeah,
I
think
our
next
our
next
meeting,
then
I
guess
right
now.
We
have
one
on
the
29th
at
the
same
time.
So
maybe
we
keep
that
one,
as
is
which
means
sibianic.
You
can
just
join
an
hour
earlier
or
later.
I
can't
remember,
I'm
all
confused
again.
I
think
you
get
to
join
an
hour
earlier
and
then
we'll
start
on
like
november
10th
is
when
we'll
switch
to
tuesdays.
A
Sweet
all
right
now
we
get
to
talk
about
fun
stuff
now
that
we
have
kind
of
the
the
whatever
out
of
the
way,
so
richard
jess,
callum
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you,
and
you
can
talk
to
him
about
this
ibm
mq
scalar.
I
saw
that
there's
a
pull
request
already,
so
maybe
I'll
open
that
up
as
well,
but
feel
free
to
share
your
screen
or
talk
to
it.
Whatever
you
want
to
share
here,.
D
Thanks
jeff,
so
just
a
little
bit
of
preamble
for
me,
so
we're
from
the
ibm
mq
development
organization
each
year
we
welcome
graduates
into
the
organization
and
set
them
a
project.
D
Ibm
mq
is
a
well-established
messaging
offering
from
from
ibm
we're
on
the
mainframe,
we're
on
the
cloud
we're
on
the
raspberry
pi,
we're
on
many
different
architectures
on
distributed,
containers
openshift,
you
name
it.
We
have
a
server
offering
there
for
this
year's
project.
We
thought
it'd
be
kind
of
cool
to
get
a
cada
scaler
in
place,
so
the
team
have
been
looking
at
over
the
last
few
weeks
and
I've
got
to
a
point
where
we
put
a
pull
request
in.
D
So
we're
really
really
excited
I'd
like
to
hand
over
to
the
guys
to
share
with
you
what
we've
been
doing.
I'd
love
to
take
some
questions.
If
that's
the
right
thing
to
do,
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
myself.
Maybe
we
can
handle
those
at
the
end
if
you'd
like
to
find
out
more
about
us,
if
you
go
to
ibm.biz
forward,
slash,
learn
dash
mq,
that's
a
dash
jeff!
I
think
we've
got
a
slash
in
there
instead.
D
C
K
Cool
cool-
that's
always
a
good
start,
so
yeah
as
richard
kind
of
said,
so
we're
doing
this.
We
had
four
grads
actually
this
year,
which
is
just
a
little
bit
smaller
than
normal,
and
we've
also
had
two
placement
students
joining
with
this,
and
the
idea
was
kind
of
to
get
to
you
guys
and
hopefully
create
a
pull
request
and-
and
we
think
we're
we're
pretty
much
there
as
you
can
kind
of
see
on
the
screen-
I
guess
yeah.
K
So
what
we've
actually
got
is
we've
got
pull
requests
for
the
actual
scaler
itself,
as
well
as
the
docs,
and
I
think
we've
already
got
merged
in
a
link
to
our
sample
app
right.
So
we've
done
a
go
sample
app
as
well,
which
is
fully
documented
as
well
at
the
moment.
Those
docs,
if
you
follow
that
it
takes
you
through
actually
installing
a
local
instance
of
cada
and
playing
it.
That
way,
because
you've
got
to
put
put
the
scaler
in,
but
hopefully
you
know
fingers
crossed.
K
We
can
change
all
that
soon
and
have
it
straight
from
from
you
guys
through
that
call
request.
So
that's
pretty
much
where
we
are.
I
think
jess
is
gonna,
give
you
a
bit
more
information
on
kind
of?
What's
what's
next
for
us
and
a
little
bit
more
on
that
kind
of
thing,.
C
Yeah
cool
so
we're
in
terms
of
those
three
things
that
callum
just
mentioned:
we're
addressing
a
couple
of
comments
that
have
been
put
on
those
pull
requests
and
if
anyone
else
does
want
to
take
a
look
and
make
any
additional
comments,
that
would
be
awesome,
but
other
than
that
we
just
have
the
integration
test
aspect
to
have
a
look
at.
C
We
were
actually
wondering
if
there
would
be
anyone
willing
to
give
us
a
little
bit
of
a
helping
hand
just
that
we
are
completely
new
to
the
framework
of
the
integration
test.
So,
if
anyone's
even
willing
to
just
take
any
questions
from
us
when
it
comes
to
us
developing
it
we've
kind
of
started,
I'm
coming
along
with
it.
It's
just
it's
a
bit
slow
progress.
Just
because
we
are
new
to
the
testing
framework
that
you've
got
for
the
integration
test.
C
A
Here
wait:
we
can
actually
stop
yeah.
I
am
curious,
I
know
he's
not
on
the
call
this
week.
He
usually
is.
I
think
the
last
person-
and
I
was
even
gonna
check
to
see
if
the
commit
log
backs
me
up.
I
think
the
last
person
who's
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
here.
Around
test
is
travis.
A
Who
is
super
great
in
a
bunch
of
ways?
I
know
he's
on
the
slack
channel
as
well
he's
not
on
this
call,
but
he
would
be
one
candidate
who,
I
think
might
be
be
a
good
option
to
reach
out
to
for
questions
as
well.
Unless
I'm
misremembering,
I
know
there
were
a
few
folks
from
who've
been
doing
some
test
stuff.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
on
the
call
would
be
a
good
candidate
as
well
to
help
answer
questions
on
setting
up
some
of
those
end-to-end
nightly.
B
C
B
Yeah
perfect,
thank
you
feel
free
to
ask
on
slack,
probably
that
was
the
best
best
way
like
on
the
other
channel,
so
probably
like.
C
Yep
sounds
good
yeah.
I
think
that
was
the
main
thing
that
we've
kind
of
got
remaining
to
work
on
other
than
that
is
just
the
pull
requests
and
addressing
any
comments,
and
hopefully
to
get
that
in
in
time
for
v2
fingers
crossed
great.
Oh
yeah,.
K
Yeah,
I
think
we're
in
a
pretty
good
place.
So
what
we've
done
is
we've
when
we
made
this
scalar
we've
based
it
off
of
v2.
To
begin
with,
I
think
that
was
kind
of
the
direction
we
were.
We
were
pushed
towards,
that's
what
it
went
for,
but
yeah,
I
think
I
say
I
think
we're
in
a
good
place.
K
So
we've
got
all
the
normal
unit
tests
and
things
that's
all
done
in
passing
and
we've
got,
I
say
a
demo
that
can
be
that
people
can
go
and
run
right
now
and
we've
got
you
guys
might
know
about
ibm
cloud
and
our
own
infrastructure,
so
the
entire
demo
can
actually
be
run
on
our
infrastructure
on
the
free
plan.
So
it's
it's
not
like
we're
limiting
this
to
the
clients
who
are
going
to
pay
the
most
kind
of
thing.
D
Jeff,
just
just
a
couple
of
things
to
wrap
up,
I
I
guess,
from
our
perspective,
be
great
to
get
a
little
bit
help
with
that
integration
test.
I
know
that's
relatively
new
and
we'd
like
to
get
that
over
the
line,
so
yeah
we'll
reach
out
on
the
slack
channel
to
do
that.
So
thank
you.
The
pull
request.
I
think
we've
got
in
a
little
bit
of
a
tis
because
things
have
been
in
and
out
and
zibanek.
D
I
know
we
spoke
earlier
and
I
think
you're
willing
to
try
and
help
us
out.
We've
been
sort
of
tidying
all
that
up.
Please
don't
put
it
on
the
screen.
It's
horrible!
D
It
looks
right,
yeah
I'll
switch
to
the
code
now
we'll
I'll
code
review.
It
live!
Oh
great!
Thank
you.
That's
awesome.
The
other
thing
that
I
had
a
question
about
and-
and
we
may
want
to
follow
this
up
offline-
is
that
there's
a
little
bit
of
confusion
from
me
around
the
contribution
terms.
So
I
followed
the
contributing
tab
and
I've
got
approval
to
submit
the
pull
request
under
those
terms.
D
There
was
then
just
a
comment
on
the
pull
request:
asking
us
to
remove
copyright
and
to
remove
the
apache
2
assertion
that
just
came
up
as
slightly
unusual
looking
at
this
as
a
contribution,
and
I'm
not
clear
as
to
whether
this
needs
to
be
a
contribution
or
a
code
donation.
So
I
don't
anticipate
any
problem
from
my
end
in
in
fulfilling
either
of
those.
It's
just
that
I
need
to
be
clear
with
the
the
guys
here,
the
team
here,
I'm
working
with
on
the
legal
side
to
make
sure
we
do
the
right
process.
B
Yeah
yeah,
yes,
like
there
was
the
arpeggio
license
with
the
with
the
ibm
like
the
copyright,
so
I
wasn't
sure
that
this
is
like
acceptable
by
cncf
like
to
have
sure,
because
we
have
like
the
project
copyright
on
the
on
on
license
in
the
in
the
repo.
So
so,
where?
Where
does
it
pop
up
like?
Where
did
it
it
is
it
is?
It
is
already
removed.
I
suppose,
like
in
the
that.
D
That
is
a
kind
of
transient
state
for
us
at
the
moment.
So
for
a
contribution
we
would
be
typically
looking
to
to
include
the
copyright
just
because
that's
the
statement
of
fact
and
we
would
make
the
contribution
under
apache
2
and
that
that's
perfectly
fine.
I
wondered
if
this
was
a
house
style
question.
So
if
it's
a
house
style
question,
then
we
would
offer
up
the
pull
request.
D
We
have
there
with
a
comment
saying
that
we've
removed
the
comments
in
each
source
file
for
compatibility
with
the
house
style,
but
I
would
need
to
add
to
the
comment
that
the
the
copyright
assertion
is
unchanged.
If
this
isn't
a
contribution,
it
needs
to
be
a
donation,
and
I
need
to
work
through
a
different
process,
and
I
I
would
like
a
little
bit
of
clarity
in
the
contributing
tab,
because
that
very
much
is
going
down
the
contributing
sort
of
process.
D
Certainly
from
my
perspective,
I
don't
think
this
is
a
big
deal.
It's
just
clarity
right
and
I
don't
want
that
to
detract
from
how
excited
we
are
to
have
a
scalar
and
to
get
ibm,
mq,
clients
up
and
running
with
this
stuff.
A
Yeah,
no,
it
makes
sense.
It's
a
it's
a
fine
topic
in
canada.
I
think
xavier
x,
probably
coming
for
the.
You
might
actually
know
a
lot
more
of
this
than
I
do.
I
I
think
my
my
initial
assumption
is,
like
we've
got
a
few
contexts
on
the
cncf
org,
more
or
less
we're
kind
of
just
like
hey,
you
know,
walked
itself
whatever
it's
mit
licensed
and
it's
a
part
of
the
cncf.
A
Oh
no,
it's
apache
licensed
in
cncf
yeah.
It
was
apache
license
when
we
went
to
the
cncf.
I
don't
know
a
whole
lot
about
this
licensed
stuff
or
what's
there,
your
request
makes
sense.
Like
I
understand,
copyrights
are
a
thing,
and
so
I
think
it's
more
of
I'll,
probably
loop
in,
like
our
main
contact
from
the
cncf
and
be
like
hey
what
are
other
projects
doing?
What's
the
recommendation?
A
I'm
fine
either
way,
we'll
probably
just
do
whatever
the
cncf
guidelines
to
have
us
do
and
then
to
your
point.
Whatever
the
answer
answer
ends
up
being
make
sure
that
it's
clear
in
the
contributing
section.
So
I'll
do
that
and
then
maybe
I
don't
know
who's
the
best
point
of
contact.
But
if
there's
some
email,
maybe
you
can
stick
an
email
in
the
chat
window.
A
I
can
include
you
on
those
emails
so
that
if
you
have
any
questions
you
can
ask
the
cncf
reps
directly,
since
I
I'm
I'm
very
ignorant
around
all
things
licenses
and
open
source.
D
Sure,
thanks
jeff
I'll,
certainly
ping,
your
own
email
address
and
we'll
take
it
from
there.
A
Great
great,
this
looks
really
good.
The
only
question
I
have
two
around
this
and
this
might
be
minor,
but
since
ahmed's
on
the
call
I
know
we
made
the
change
in
v2
that
if
something
is
being
loaded
from
an
environment
variable,
we
appended
it
with
ref,
given
that
they
have
username
and
password
here
that
are
in
that
world.
Does
this
need
to
be
username,
ref
and
password
ref?
Is
that
what
we
landed
on.
J
Well,
will
I
let
from
n
as
a
suffix,
oh
from
m-
that's
what
it
was
yeah,
but
I
think
yeah.
I
meant
to
comment
on
that
for
requests.
Currently
they
don't
read
username
and
password
from
enviro.
It
might
be
a
nice
thing
to
support,
but
we
only
read
it
from
the
auth
parameters.
J
A
Can
follow
up
on
the
program
I
see
I
see
I
didn't
even
realize
there
was
a
way
you
could
do
exclusively
from
off
parameters
and
not
also
do
it
from
amph,
okay
yeah.
So
I
guess
it
is
kind
of
up
to
you
in
in
some
ways.
I
don't
know
folks
on
the
call,
if
you,
if
you
got
the
gist
of
the
conversation
back
and
forth
there,
did
that
make
sense
to
you
at
all
of
the
decision
to
be
made.
C
I
was
just
saying
yep
that
sounds,
makes
sense,
I'll
see
what
you
mean
about
the
from
end.
We
just
went
down
the
orth
params
group,
yeah.
A
Yeah,
which
is
fine
like
honestly,
I
can
see
a
world
where
it's
like
look
we,
for
whatever
reason
we
just
don't,
want
anyone
to
do
from
amp.
Usually
we
do
that
like
historically,
I
guess
we've
done
from
envelope
for
like
ease
of
use
in
terms
of
you
only
dealing
with
one
thing
and
you're
dealing
with
environment
variables.
A
However,
you
want,
but
especially
when
it's
something
like
a
secret,
more
often
than
not
people
or
I
guess
from
em-
can
be
from
a
secret
as
well
directly
in
line
it
just
means
they
don't
have
to
deal
with
this
extra
crd,
which,
whatever
this
is
ten
lines.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
have
a
official
stance
where
it's
like
we
require
from
anven
and
for
off
parameters.
I
cannot
blame
fine.
A
If
people
do
this
route
as
long
as
it's
clearly
documented
that
it's
like
you
cannot
do
from
m,
you
have
to
do
trigger
authentication,
since
I
think
the
default
for
all
of
the
other
scalers
is
that
if
it's
something
that
could
be
in
trigger
authentication,
it
could
also
be
an
inline
secret
or
an
inline
environment
variable,
and
it
would
also
resolve.
A
J
I
mean
all
other
scalars
have
that,
like
all
other
scalars
that
have
secrets
support
from
and
from
the
metadata
directly,
I'm
not
like,
ideologically
opposed
to
having
a
scalar
that
doesn't.
But
it's
up
to
you
guys.
A
Sure
so
I
guess
maybe
put
otherwise
if,
if
you're
not
opposed
to
having
from
m,
it
might
just
make
it.
So
this
isn't
the
odd
odd
duck
out
if
we
changed
it,
if
we
just
add
that
into
the
code
so
that
it
could
also
be
from
m,
which
would
also
mean
to
be
consistent
with
v2,
the
parameter
names
would
change
to
username
from
m
and
password
from
m,
as
you
can
see
how
we've
done
with
a
bunch
of
these
other
ones
in
the
change
log.
Just
so
that
folks
know.
C
C
A
This
looks
and
honestly
this
looks
fantastic,
so
I'm
I'm
thrilled
to
I.
I
assume
the
sample,
and
this
is
again
my
ignorance,
like
I
know,
of
ibm
q,
because
I've
had
a
good
few
azure
customers
who
use
ibm
mq.
I
personally
have
never
spoken.
A
Yes,
but
like
I'm
even
keen
to
to
test
this
out
or
add
it
to
my
my
demo
suite
so
this
looks
great.
D
We've
got
a
little
learning
journey
there,
so
you
can
get
yourself
in
the
claim
badge
and
there's
a
little
hand
on
code,
hands-on,
coding
challenge
and
a
little
quiz
at
the
end.
So
you
know
if
you
want
to
go
see
that
you'd
be
more
than
welcome,
but
I'm
happy
to
do
a
call
if
you,
if
you
want
to
talk
about
a
little
bit
more
about
what
we're
doing
in
mq
land,
just
a
couple
of
things
so
we'll
take
care
of
those
changes.
I
think
we
just
need
to
tidy
up
the
license.
D
Clarity,
I
think
that's
all.
It
is
jeff
and
the
wider
team
just
really
important
to
note
that
jess
and
callum
have
only
been
with
us
for
a
few
weeks.
They
didn't
know
a
great
deal
about
mq
when
they
they
joined.
D
They
certainly
didn't
know
anything
about
cada
they've,
grabbed
all
that
technology
they've
used
your
dock
and
they've
delivered
a
scale,
a
scalar
within
that
team
of
four,
which
I
think
was
really
quite
amazing,
and
there
might
be
some
benefit
to
just
them,
telling
you
their
story
and
how
they
went
through
that
on
another
time.
There
might
be
some
changes
that
you
might
want
to
consider
as
a
result
of
that,
and
there
might
be
some.
D
You
know
some
great
feedback
and
discussions
that
will
come
out
of
it
and
on
that
point,
just
wanted
to
check
with
you
guys
that
it
would
be
okay.
If
we
put
someone
on
the
call
every
every
couple
of
weeks
here
just
to
keep
in
touch
with
what
you're
doing
and
that
kind
of
thing,
I
guess
specifically
wondered
if
there
was
any
sort
of
approval
for
that
or
whether
you
know
you
guys
be
happy
just
to
see
us
come
along.
A
Yeah
we
would
love
to
have
you
come
along
and
honestly
it's
it's
fantastic,
I'm
I'm
I'm
flattered
and
thrilled
that
you
chose
keda
and
an
ibm,
mq
scaler
as
the
thing
to
ramp
up
and
learn
and
yeah.
Absolutely,
I
would
love.
I
know
we're
we're
running
a
little
bit
short
on
time
this
week,
but
whether
we
do
it
in
a
future
stand
up
or
even
on
slack,
is
we've
kind
of
mentioned.
All
of
us
are
active
and
listening
to
slack
like
understanding
what
that
was
like
on
boarding
and
ramping
up
and
using
it.
A
We
dug
into
it
a
few
months
ago.
I
think
in
terms
of
trying
to
clean
up
the
contribution
stuff.
Maybe
you
benefited
from
all
of
that
and
a
lot
of
the
the
the
pointy
edges
were
cleaner.
I
would
imagine,
there's
a
new
set
of
pointy
edges
or
maybe
slightly
dulled,
edges
and
yeah.
All
of
that
is
fantastic.
I'd
love
to
learn
more.
D
Yeah,
that's
great,
we'll
we'll
make
difference
come
along
and
participate
for
sure
we
would
love
to
do
that
and
if
some
conversations
spin
out
of
it,
you
know
we'll
take
part
for
sure.
A
The
other
one
too
that's
an
option
depending
on
your
level
of
interest
like
we
do
have
on
the
cada
site.
This
blog,
that's
pretty
sparse,
like
we
use
it
from
time
to
time.
If
you're
keen
to
do
just
a
blog
as
well,
to
either
explain
about
your
experience
in
contributing
or
anything
around
cada,
that's
something
I
know
we'd
be
thrilled
to
help
promote
from
our
side
on
whatever
channels
we
can
as
well
great
we'll
we'll
take
that
back
to
the
team.
Thank
you.
Sweet
thanks.
Al
thanks
for
joining
great
meeting
you,
okay.
She.
A
A
B
No,
I
guess
it's
it's
some
provider
from
from
cncf,
oh.
A
A
A
I
like
option
one,
I
know
tom,
said
a
combination.
I
wonder
if
he
means
like
option
two
in
the
front
option,
one
in
the
back,
but
I
I
I'm
a
fan
of
just
the
logo
straight
above
the
heart
iron
man
style,
but
yeah.
I
I
think
the
the
option,
one
with
the
filled
in
lightning
bolt,
so
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
clear.
That's
my
vote.
B
B
No,
I
mean
I
mean,
like
the
gray
and
blue
from
the
option,
one
and
the
mint
from
the
options.
A
It's
on
the
agenda
yeah-
I
I
honestly
am
just
I
I
didn't
even
realize
we
had
it's
funny.
I
ordered
a
bunch
of
kedah
shirts
right
before
the
pandemic,
to
give
out
it
at,
I
think,
kubecon
at
the
microsoft
booth,
but
then
kubecon
got
cancelled
and
now
they're
sitting
in
a
closet
and
a
storage
closet
back
at
microsoft
headquarters,
but
they
they
weren't
nearly
as
cool
as
I
actually
think
I
just
did
this
design
the
navy
option,
one
more
or
less.
I
don't.
A
I
couldn't
tell
you
what
the
lightning
bolt
looked
like,
though
okay,
so
we
should
get
a
lot
more
cada
shirts
out
in
the
wild
I'll
give
this
update
from
tom
worth
noting
so
there's
a
a
a
series
that
happens
on
the
azure
developer
channel
called
azure
fridays
that
they
just
do
like
a
10-minute
recording
of
like
hey,
here's,
a
little
bit
of
tech,
and
then
it
gets
viewed
by
some
whatever
thousands
of
people.
A
Tom's
gonna
go
on
the
show
and
talk
about
cada
and,
as
part
of
it,
he's
going
to
show
his
service
bus
sample.
So
he
moved
that
to
2.0
he
updated
the
pot
identity
so
that
he
can
showcase
k2o
along
with
his
sample
at
this
azure
friday
kind
of
marketing
spiel.
That
will
probably
be
published
a
little
bit
later
this
year.
I
think
he
records
in
early
november.
So
that's
great.
B
Jeff
jeff,
if
I
may
relevant
to
this,
probably
we
will
need
to
migrate
like
the
rest
of
the
samples
to
v2.
A
That's
a
very
good
point:
yeah,
that's
a
really
good!
Maybe.
A
Yeah,
at
the
very
least,
we
need
to
clearly
mark
like,
if
we're
not
going
to
manually,
upgrade
the
samples
like
flag,
which
ones
are
v1
and
which
ones
are
v2,
maybe
put
v2
below
a
fold
or
something
but
yeah
you're
right,
there's
a
lot
of
samples
here
and
a
lot
that
will
need
to
be
updated.
A
Yeah,
I'm!
I
was
because
a
lot
of
these
linked
to
other
repos,
and
so
maybe
I'm
trying
to
think
if
I
have
a
meeting
later
today
where
I
can
just
open
a
lot
of
these
and
create
an
issue.
That's
like
move
to
v2
and
then
see
what
happens
with
it
and
if
it
doesn't,
then
we
just
have
to
make
sure
that
folks
know
this
is
only
works
on
v1
and
we'll
probably
put
like
a
line
here.
So
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up.
That's
a
that's
a
good
issue!
A
Let
me
move
samples
to
v2,
I'm
going
to
create
the
placeholder
issue
here.
My
github
notifications
are
consistently
underwater.
So
I'm
going
to
add
a
item
for
me
in
my
own
personal
to-do
list
that
does
not
have
all
the
things
to
track
this
and
I'll.
Take
some
action
here,
jeff
to
ping
the
sample
to
move
okay
and
then
the
last
one
we
have
is
helm2.
A
I
think
travis
was
the
last
one
who's
going
to
look
at
this
and
he's
not
on
the
call
today-
and
I
guess
his
proposal
is
just:
do
we
deprecate
helm2
for
cada
2.0.
B
A
A
Okay
I'll,
create
an
issue
on
the
charts
repo.
I
assume
yeah
they're,
like
people
who
are
using
older
charts
like
they
use
a
specific
version.
If
they
were
using
too
it's
not
like
that's
going
to
break
it
would
just
be
if
they
try
to
use
the
latest
charts.
It
would
only
work
with
home
too.
Is
that
accurate?
As
far
as
you
know,
xavier?
Yes,
I
suppose
yes
yeah,
and
I
know
there's
already
an
issue
here
as
well
on
this
one.
So
I'll
just
add
here.
A
A
That's
how
we
had
on
the
scheduled
agenda.
Any
other
topics
folks
want
to
bring
up
or
updates
they
want
to
share
before
we
sign
off.
D
Did
you
want
the
team
ibm
t-shirt,
sizes
jeff,
so
we
can
get
a
t-shirt
or.
A
A
A
Hey
at
the
very
least
you
could
we
are
participating
in
oktoberfest.
If
you
just
add
a
hacktoberfest
flag
to
your
pr
and
get
it
approved,
you
can
get
a
shirt
from
digitalocean.
I
guess,
though,
it.
A
D
A
Yeah
no
worries
these
are
the
topics
we
need
to
take
time
for
so
I
appreciate
it
all
right,
thanks
all
for
joining
I'll,
go
ahead
and
upload
this
to
youtube
and
we'll
talk
again,
two
weeks
from
now
same
time,
except
for
zibianek
and
folks
who
have
earlier
daylight
savings,
you
get
a
little
bit
earlier.
So
talk
to
you
then.