►
From YouTube: [SIG-Network] Ingress NGINX meeting 20210706
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello,
everyone-
this
is
sign
network
ingress,
engineer,
subproject
meeting
today
is
july,
6
2021.
This
is
a
kubernetes
community
meeting
and
we
ask
you
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct,
which
is
basically
be
excellent
with
each
other.
Any
violation
should
be
reported
to
the
sig
chairs
or
the
one
running
this
meeting
privately.
A
B
Hi,
I'm
carol
chan,
I've
been
at
f5
for
15
years,
but
recently
joined
the
nginx
side
of
the
house.
I
work
with
alan
who's
on
the
call.
A
A
A
A
All
right,
so
I
think,
from
the
issue
trials
perspective,
I
was
just
going
to
go
through
the
unlabeled
support
requests
that
are
issues
that
come
up.
I
have
some
already
pulled
up.
I
saw
that
there
are
some
that
have
comments,
so
some
of
them
are
about
a
month
old.
We
just
probably
want
to
stay
on
top
of
the
ones
that
aren't
labeled,
so
I
was
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
walk
through
those
unless
anyone
has
any
high
level
ones
that
we
need
to
talk
to.
A
I
know
I've
got
a
list
of
some
that
I
asked
in
this
the
chat,
but
I'm
just
going
to
run
through
the
unlabeled
ones.
Give
that
time
box.
After
about
15
minutes.
A
So
it
looks
like
again
yeah
there's
a
couple
of
these
tour
dash
was
looking
at,
but
this
doesn't
look
like
it's
a
bug.
C
Yeah,
usually
elvin
is
the
one
to
to
to
query
about
those
things,
and
I
guess
also
wayne
is
is
someone
that
that
deals
with
this
thing,
but
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
actually
realize
if
tardash
is
saying,
yeah
hey
the
code
is
right
or
hey
yeah.
What
you
are
complaining
is
right
like
what
seems
to
be
correct.
C
To
that
part
james,
so
we
have,
it
seems
that
we
have
two
set:
two
set
thigh
mouths
right.
So
we
have
this
sethi
mouth
and
the
set
time
mouths
and
the
setting
mouth
takes
three
arguments.
C
A
D
A
B
C
A
C
C
Is
this
is
actually
an
issue
or
not
so
you
you
can
probably
paste
this
and
and
and
like
query
in
slack
you
can
just
because,
as
the
the
the
folks
in
asia,
they
are
not
able
to
join
here,
you
can
maybe
ask
for
like
for
for
weighing
or
for
for
someone
saying
hey.
Can
you
please
take
a
look
into
this
and
and
say
if
this
is
right
or
wrong,
and
if
this
should
be
corrected
because
they
usually,
they
are
faster.
Taking
a
look
when
when
we
ask
them
to
okay,
so.
A
A
Again,
this
is
a
long,
so
he's
trying
to
keep
the
source
ip
the
same
while
setting
up
and
doing
udp
streaming.
But
I
do
agree.
It's
like
nginx
is
acting
as
a
proxy.
Of
course
it's
going
to
create
a
new
stream,
so
I
don't
think
this
really.
I
don't
think
this
is
an
issue
if
he
needs
to
retain
that,
then
probably
not
use
a
proxy
yeah
any
other
thoughts.
E
E
A
C
Like
ingress,
actually
in
gen
x,
is
actually
not
the
layer,
seven
right.
So
when
you
use
like
this
one
as
an
http
proxy,
you
can
forward
the
ip
with
the
like
the
header
or
so
on
yeah,
but
with
tcp
and
udp.
You
are
saying
hey.
I
want
to
modify
the
packet
heat,
the
packet
heater,
which
is
which
usually
you
do
in
a
router
or
something
like
that
doing.
Applying
some
network
address
translation,
but
not
with
the
ingress.
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
it's
like
I
said
it's
it's
possible
to
do
with
by
setting
up
ip
transparency,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
even
possible
to
do
at
the
container
at
a
container
level
if
it
is.
E
A
I
think
this
is
just
a.
I
wonder
if
this
was
a
scaling
issue
because
he
was
getting.
I
was
getting
bad
requests.
I
wonder
if,
while
they
were
doing
the
load
testing,
if
it
was
scaling
up,
he
doesn't
have
any
other
information
about
virgins.
A
He's
got
some
logs,
but
he
doesn't
have
the
nginx
version.
He
doesn't
say
if
the
the
app
was
auto
scaling
or
if
anything
else.
I
think
that
was
the
only
other
thing
I
saw
it
here
so
we're
seeing
a
response
code
in
nginx
while
doing
load
testing.
I
feel
like
he
needs
to
add
a
little
bit
more
information
around
the
service
and
probably
the
nginx
yeah.
C
C
C
E
D
C
B
C
C
C
A
C
Yeah,
I
can't
remember
of
any
action
item
right
now.
Maybe
there
is
in
some
somewhere
in
the
middle
notes
from
last.
A
C
A
C
Yeah
yeah
cool,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
pass
through
this
one
and
probably
probably
know
I
will
have
to
drop
in
10
minutes
but
yeah.
So
jordan
legit
reached
me
and
he
he
was,
he
was
trying.
C
He
was
making
some
tests
into
the
view
one
he
first
of
all
he
he
really
thanked
us
to
to
bring
this
to
move
forward.
Otherwise
we
would
be
some
some
sort
of
blocking
to
remove
you
one
better
one
from
not
that
we
would
not
that
we
would
block
because
they
were
already
removing
that
from
from
the
v122.
But
as
this
is
like
the
most
used
ingress,
it
would
be
a
huge
problem
for
people
to
move
forward
right.
C
The
other
one
is
about
inverse
class,
which
I
am
going
to
take
care.
Probably
this
week
I
was
finalizing
other
urgent
things,
but
this
is
my
my
next
on
the
top
of
my
top
of
my
pile
of
things
to
do,
but
about
supporting
ingress
class
and
the
other
one
is
still
open.
But
let
me
see
because
because
jordan,
jordan
is
he's
really
nice,
so
he
he
already
wrote
also.
What
are
the
corrections
for
those
teams?
C
So
let
me
see
here,
although
legit
yeah,
so
the
other
one
is
to
handle
or
ignore
known
services
back
in
so
apparently
non-service
beckons.
They
are
not
being
handled
or
illuminated
properly.
I
I
need
to
take
a
look
into
exactly
what
what
jordan
is
saying
about
that.
I
guess
it's
related
to
to
the
plugins,
but
he
already
actually
added
like
the
patch
as
well,
when
carlos
is
going
to
take
care
of
this.
C
So
it's
it's
mostly
it's
mostly
a
matter
of
of
accepting
and
releasing
a
new
cubesat
in
and
some
other
stuff,
but
yeah
where
three
issues
and-
and
I
just
need
to
take
care
of
the
ingress
class
and
carlos-
is
taking
care
of
this
other
one
as
well.
So
it's
going
fine.
We've
got
some
folks
testing
not
because
they
wanted,
but
because
they
they
have
deployed
the
the
wrong
manifest
or
something
like
that.
C
But
yeah
I've
seen
that
in
kind,
but
it
seems
to
be
working
like
they
said:
hey
ingress
and
giant
x
works
fine.
The
version
one
alpha
works,
fine
in
the
latest
versions
of
kind,
but
not
the
older
one.
So
can
you
please
fix
the
manifests,
but
it's
a
it
seems
to
be
working.
Fine,
but
that's
simple.
We
didn't.
C
Is
that
I
updated
the
kind
manifest
only
to
drop
the
support
for
v1,
better
one
admission
webhook,
because
I
needed
that
to
to
the
to
to
to
pass
the
tests,
but
I
completely
forgot
that
dropping
that
would
break
users
using
the
version
0
47
in
kind.
C
A
C
C
So
when
I
was
doing
the
the
badge
and
because
it
wasn't
on
on
kind
mind
manifest
and
because
folks
they
were
were
pointing
to
the
to
the
manifest
in
in
the
main
branch
which
was
correct
because
we
didn't
drop
it
anything
we
shouldn't
have
dropped
anything
there.
They
got
some
errors
in
the
admission
web
hook,
trying
to
check
like
the
wrong
the
wrong
object.
C
So
I,
instead
of
like
reverting
everything
or
trying
to
do
something
really
complex,
I
have
discussed
it
with
with
benjamin
elder
and
and
and
antonio,
if
like
adding
a
stable.txt
in
the
root
in
the
root,
the
root
of
the
ripple
when
and
adding
in
the
documentation
of
kind.
So,
instead
of
just
doing
a
quick
city
I'll
apply
in
the
manifest
doing,
like
stable
version
equals
to
what
that's
inside
that
file
and
then
keep
I
apply
in
from
the
manifest
in
that
range.
C
Should
work
and
they
were
okay,
and
I
did
that
so
this
is
why
I
I
have
added
that
that
stable.ext
in
our
in
our
main
repo,
so
ben,
asked
me
to
probably
later
publish
there
publish
the
manifest
somewhere
else
like
hey.
This
is
the
stable
manifests
that
that
folks
need
you
to
follow.
Instead
of
having
two
steps
of
exporting
a
variable
with
curl
and
then
doing
a
cube,
ctrl
apply,
I
think.
A
C
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
today
we
are
doing
things
pretty
pretty.
You
know
in
some
somehow
they
are
pretty
complicated
right
because
the
manifest
they
can
be
always
the
same
in
the
home
shards,
they
can
always
be
the
same
and
they
just
need
some
some
input
information
to
generate
all
of
those
files.
So
I
am
I'm
wondering
how
can
we
make
it
seem
more
more
code-like
right,
saying,
hey!
C
This
is
a
new
version
and
point
to
this
controller
version
and
apply
everywhere,
and
we
just
publish
somewhere
else
not
like
not
in
not
even
yeah,
maybe
on
on
google
google
cloud
infrastructure,
which
kubernetes
have
an
account.
So
I
just
need
to
ask
for
the
cupcakes
working
group
the
same
one
that
the
same
one
that
runs
our
cloud
builds.
A
Foreign
and
ricardo,
before
you
drop,
I
don't
I
know,
we've
talked
about
this
one.
We
agree
on
the
template
generation.
I
don't
have
the
context
for
these
two
for
the
deep
copy
or
the
removing
bezel
grp
example.
I
think
the
conversation
there
really
was
just
point
to
jrp's
grpc's
example
and
drop
bars.
C
Yeah,
no
so
so
about
the
jrpc.
Long
long
is
taking
care
of
this
one.
We
have
an
application,
a
demo
application
inside,
and
actually
we
don't
need
that
so
that
there
is
a
bunch
of
a
bunch
of
examples
on
grpc
example.
C
C
But
compiling
in
our
own,
so
because
if
we
just
go
and
remove
this,
that
this
might
be
like
some
breaking
change
and
actually
it's
not.
I
don't
think
it's
cool
like
to
keep
pointing
users
to
outside
of
the
repo
like
hey
just
go.
Do
that
as
they
say
in
the
documentation
right.
So
actually
it's
like
an
opportunity
for
him
to
learn
a
little
bit
of
go
as
well.
So
he
told
me-
and
he
said:
hey,
okay,
I'm
really,
okay
of
doing
that.
So
my
suggestion
was,
let's
replace
everything
here
to
like
something
really
similar.
C
C
That
folks
can
also
use
that
to
test,
and
this
might
be
actually
a
way
that
we
could
add
some
eqe
tests
of
grpc
as
well,
because
I
don't
think
we
have
it,
but
we
should
test
grpc
as
well,
so
so
yeah
this
is
this
is
this
is
actually
long
long
mistaking
I'll
look
into
that
and
the
other
one
about
deep
copy?
C
Is
he
kill
you?
I
think
it's
his
name.
C
Yeah
kill
you
he
he
he
reached
me
and
and
he
he
got
some
some
suggestions
about
optimization
of
the
code,
mainly
on
the.
C
So
the
first
one
was
to
drop
the
shell
script,
that
does
the
clean
up
of
the
angina,
the
cleanup
and
formatting
of
njmaxx.com
to
some
gold
bases,
and
this
is
already
present
in
in
the
main
branch,
and
I
I
have
asked
it
to
him
to
to
make
a
cherry
peak
into
the
old
branch
as
well,
and
this
is
the
other
one.
So
this
other
one
is
actually
I
I
might
be.
C
I
might
be
a
bit
annoyed,
sometimes
with
those
like
deep
copy
or
not,
but
because
I
I
have
been
hurting
in
the
past
about
this
like
trying
to.
He
writes
some
pointers
and
not
understanding
how
things
works,
but
he
seems
to
to
know
actually
what
he's
doing.
I
I
just
told
him
that
I
I
wanna
make
some
some
some
further
tests,
just
to
say:
hey,
okay,
we
we
are
really
safe
with
your
change,
removing
the
div
copy
and
just
just
going
to
the
the
the
reference
of
the
pointer
yeah.
So
it's
mostly
like.
C
C
I
it's
it's
the
next
one
after
I
can
finish
the
ingress
class
team,
because
this
is
an
optimization
for
big
users,
but
I
think
it
can
wait
until
I
finish
and
we
can
release
the
v1
next
alpha
or
a
better
one
before
they
release
kubernetes
v122.
Otherwise
they
are
going
to
release
v1022
and
if
we
don't
have
like
ingress
view,
one
people
are
going
to
start
complaining
with
us.
A
C
He
opened
really
is
a
new
v0.48.
Probably
we
should
probably
do
that.
A
C
A
D
Damian
just
stepped
away
because
of
kid
duty,
I'll
ping,
him
offline.
A
Okay,
unless
anyone
else
has
any
other
topics
that
we
need
to
discuss,
we
can
go
ahead
and
drop
for
the
for
this
week.