►
From YouTube: Kubernetes kops office hours 20201009
Description
Recording of the kops office hours meeting held on 20201009
A
A
B
C
B
B
B
B
A
B
D
D
C
B
B
B
B
Okay,
I
mean
the
the
goal
of
the
feature
flag
is
to
clearly
delineate
the
areas
where
we,
where
we
do
not
make
a
guarantee.
It's
not
it's
not
that
we
will
accidentally
break
something
it's
so
we
reserve
the
right
to
deliberately
break
it
because
it
makes
it
for
a
better
experience,
but
yeah
an
easy
test
would
be
nice,
but
it's
not
gonna
help.
It's
not
gonna.
It's
not
gonna
make
the
feature
magically.
C
Yeah,
that's
what
that
was
added
by
me,
sorry
to
say,
but
I
think
we
made
a
mistake
last
time
complicating
the
feature
for
compatib
for
making
it
work
with.
You
know
both
nlp
and
classic
load,
balancer
and
priorities,
because
this
should
merge
as
soon
as
possible
and
then
tweak
it
more
adding
more
stuff
in
it.
B
C
The
person
already
did
some
of
the
changes,
I'm
not
really
sure,
because
I
didn't
actively
review
it.
It's
kind
of
huge
and
I
think
it's
still
working
progress
so,
but
if
our
changes
to
allow
both
elb
and
nlb
at
the
same
time
are
complicating
things,
maybe
we
should
strip
these
things
and
make
it
as
simple
as
possible,
at
least
to
get
the
nlb
support,
and
then
maybe
some
of
us
can
help
improve.
C
B
The
size
will
be
greatly
reduced
to
the
pr
if
we
split
it
up
into
introduce
nlb
as
the
first
one,
which
would
then
mean
that
we
can
really
see
the
the
those
the
sort
of
sticking
points
right,
because
I
don't
think
anyone
objects
to
the
nlb
or
has
any
issues
with
the
nlp
support.
I'm
sure
that
we'll
find
a
couple
of
minor
things,
but
you
know
nothing
serious
and
then
but
yeah.
The
the
the
nuances
of
how
the
prioritization
works
is,
is
much
trickier
and
so
like
having
a
small
pr
which
introduces.
A
First,
pr
is
cubetest,
which
is
the
test
tool
that
we
use
to
run
our
e2e
tests.
They
have
a
new
cube,
test2
and
I've
been
wanting
us
to
migrate
to
it,
mostly
because
the
original
cube
test
is
under
maintenance
mode.
So
they
are
not
accepting
big
features
to
it
and
we
want
to
add
new
features
to
our
e
testing
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
test
more,
have
improved
test
coverage,
and
so
this
pr
kind
of
sets
up
the
initial
setup
for
cubetest
2.
A
There's
there's
complications
with
how
we'll
run
periodic
jobs
because
they
don't
clone
the
cops
repo,
and
so
we
have
to
decide
how
we
will
build
the
cube
test,
2
cops
binary
and
which
commits
we
use
for
that
when
we're
doing
periodics-
and
I
have
a
few
suggestions
for
that-
but
yeah-
that's
kind
of
most,
mostly
how
I
was
envisioning
it
right
now.
It
only
does
a
build
and
publish
to
gcs,
but
it
should
be
good
to
extend
further
to
actually
launch
clusters
and
run
the
kubernetes
et
test
suite.
B
B
A
D
B
A
B
B
D
B
B
B
A
C
E
C
F
B
It's
more
of
like
a.
I
think.
The
core
idea
is
to
encourage
people
to
work
on
open
source
and
hack
on
open
source,
and
we
are
interpreting
that
in
an
ongoing
and
fluid
way
and
trying
to
decide
what
that
means.
So
we
had
a
couple
of
sort
of
kick-off
meetings
where
we
basically
talked
about.
You
know
things
that
we're
interested
in
working
on
over
the
sort
of
month
to
couple
of
month
horizon
in
the
people
that
showed
up,
and
it
is
sponsored
the
the
official
october
event.
B
The
oktoberfest
event
is
sponsored
by
digitalocean,
and
if
people
send
three
or
four
I
can't
recall
prs,
I
believe
digitalocean
will
send
them
a
t-shirt.
That's
kind
of
beside
the
point
I
think
about
how
we
are
doing
it.
The
but
yeah
we're
just
trying
to
encourage
either
new
contributors
or
people
to
their
existing
contributors
to
to
work
on
something
over
that
sort
of
time
period
and
also
using
it
to
experiment
with
different
time
slots.
B
So
if
you're
interested
in
in
hacking
on
cops
or
hacking
on
something
unrelated
to
cops
ideally
related
to
kubernetes
in
that
in
that
group,
but
it
doesn't
much
matter
other
than
the
fact
that
we
won't
be
able
to
tell
you
or
won't
have
any
real
opinions
about
other
things.
Then
it's
great
to
sort
of
come
along
if
you
can
or
just
work
sort
of
digitally
and
like
on
github
and
look
for
the
hacktoberfest
tags
for
repos
or
issues
or
things
like
that.
F
D
B
On
the
sorry,
just
on
the
previous
mini
topic
around
arm
images,
we
actually
talked
about
it
in
the
hectare
fest
meetings,
I
think,
but
I
think
one
of
the
blockers
for
std
managers
aren't
invited,
was
trying
to
find
a
good
base
image,
and
I
I
think
we
found
the
debian
10
image
that
docker
maintains
docker
inc
maintains,
and
it
seems,
reproducible
and
good.
In
that
regard,
I
just
have
to
make
sure
that
it
is
actually
reproducible
and
so
forth.
So
far
I
failed
to
do
so
so
I'm
gonna
be.
A
C
C
There
is
a
pr
there,
that's
not
quite
there,
but
once
it
is
in.
I
hope
that
that
person
can
finish
it.
If
not,
I
will
try
to.
I
think
I
can
try
to
put
something
into
118.
If
you
don't
mind,
but
someone
would
have
to
do
well.
Justin
would
have
to
do
the
release
we
did
so.
Are
we,
okay
with
the
118
release.
B
Yeah,
I
think
so.
Certainly
sir,
I
meant
from
the
point
of
view
of
of
the
work
I
just
want
to
clarify.
You
said
cops
upgrade
is
broken.
You
mean
literally
the
cops
upgrade
command.
You
do
not
mean
that
upgrading
cops
is
broken.
Yes,
it's
better,
not
great,
but
yeah.
It's
still
that's
much
better.
All
right,
good.
C
C
C
B
B
A
B
B
A
B
C
B
C
B
B
B
Literally
scratch
and
just
install
the
just
the
packages
we
need
by
just
expanding
them
without
doing
an
installation
which
is
probably
better
than
any
of
the
other
options,
except
it's
a
little
bit
more
work
to
maintain.
But
I
don't
know
that's
if
I,
if
I
totally,
if
I
can't,
if
I
can't
reproduce
the
other
image,
that
is,
if
I
can't
reproduce
the
official
debian
10
image,
then
that
will
be
the.
I
guess
the
full
back
plan.
B
G
It's
pretty
much
right
there,
so
there's
a
bug
with
terraform.
I'm
gonna
call
it
a
bug
for
a
lack
of
a
better
explanation
where,
if
you
set
the
load
balancer
outside
of
the
asg
definition
like
with
the
load
balancer
attachment
on
terraform
12,
every
time
you
run
terraform
it
attaches
or
detaches
it
doesn't
matter
what
the
state
of
the
terraform
configuration
is.
The
actual
the
actual
apply
changes
that
every
single
time
I
I've
experienced
it
with
some
clusters
and
not
others.
G
So
I
created
that
pr
so
that
it
does
have
the
little
battlestar
attachment
happen
on
the
same
block
as
the
asg
creation
and
not
an
external
attachment.
However,
there
is
a
downtime
for
the
switch
peter
offered,
a
solution
that
we
may
be
able
to
do
something
where
we
modify
the
terraform
state
before
we
do
the
first
supply.
For
that
pr,
I
unfortunately
haven't
had
time
to
actually
test
that
and
I
haven't
found
any
other
ways
to
not
take
a
downtime.
G
A
G
G
Sorry
did
you
say
there
was
a
bug
open
for
this.
There
is
well,
there
is
a
bug
that
was
closed,
their
recommendations,
pretty
much.
Don't
do
that
or
just
ignore
the
little
balancers
on
the
sheath
you're
using
a
external
load
balance
attachment.
Sorry,
is
there
a
cops
bug?
Is
there
a
cop
spot
for
it?
There
is
a
cops
bug
for
it.
There
is
here.
Let
me
pull
the
pr
there's
links
to
that
as
well.