►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
Like
this
yeah,
that
is
nice
and
you
think
we
created
cheese,
one,
the
announcements
each
was
donated
like
in
the
end
of
the
July
and
say,
put
you
here,
the
announcements
that
we
have
been
doing
right
just
see,
for
we
have
the
informations,
so
we
can,
for
example,
choose
one
also
announcing
the
Red
Hedge
community,
so
also
going
back
to
also
is
relevant
for
Kobe
Builder
user.
So
I
just
put
the
same
thing
here
for
lets.
They
know
about
the
removals.
A
A
C
A
A
Yeah,
since
this
is
also
technical
leads
one
of
the
the
consumers,
this
is
very
skillage
and
it
has
been
helpless.
So
much
varsha
is
a
hawk
as
well.
It's
another
Stars,
so
she
has
been
helping
the
Google
summer.
Coach
program
is
very
knowledgeable
in
controllable
time
as
you
control
other
tools
change
it
both
has
been
contributing
a
lot
with
the
project
and
she
that
should
be
nice
because
we
will
win
more
forces
to
to
grow
the
project,
change
everything
the
common
age
Jesus
can
help.
A
D
A
A
A
A
Here
has
the
data
okay
so
size
it
is
they
we
no
longer
discovered
this
plugin
by
default
right.
So
it
is
my
name
deprecated
from
science
from
two
stage
which
I
don't
know
like.
Should
we
who
do
we
removed
from
the
next
release?
Could
we
should
we
do
another
announcement
and
say:
okay,
you
you
remove
when
we
bump
kubernetes
1.26,
for
example,.
D
Of
kubernetes
1.26
is
in
December,
so
I
think
we
have
like
around
two
months
more,
so
we
can
probably
do
some
announcements
by
then
get
some
traction
and
like
21.
2016
is
a
good
Target,
but
it
won't
be
3.8.
I.
Think
we'll
have
a
bunch
of
more
minor
releases
of
cube.
Builder
a
bit
of
under
26
is
the
target.
Then
it
would
be
two
months
from
now.
A
D
C
A
The
other
one
is
about
to
cheats
right.
We
have
a
the
request.
He
was
like
before
we
change
the
layout
put
the
package
in
jpins
controller
inside
of
the
package.
If
you
will
check
if
many
goaling
documentations,
they
claim
that
that
she
is
a
good
practice
right
and
we
have
it
20
21
people
that
she
votes
on
this
one.
A
It
is
open
for
a
while
and
it
was
brought
he
in
his
meeting
many
times
so
I
was
thinking.
We
don't
need
to
reach
out
to
the
consensus
now,
but
she
I
was
thinking
about
it.
If
he
will
change
the
layout
from
the
goal
before
our
plugin
interchanges.
People
is
asking
about
you
all
what
should
be
with
the
problem,
because
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
any
any
objections
right
like
today.
We.
B
B
B
Well,
that's
what
I
was
thinking
about,
create
API,
but
then
I
realized.
That's
talking
implementation,
which
I
don't
think
we
need
to
talk
about
now.
I'm
trying
to
go
through
what
I
was
intending
to
go
through
was
what
is
likely
affected
and
then
think
about
how
they
would
be
affected
to
see
how
big
of
a
change
the
V4
would
be.
B
A
C
A
A
The
group
inside
yeah,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
I,
don't
think
it's
too
much
change
right.
She's,
like
you
all
places
where
we
Define
the
path.
Now
we
will
only
appearing
butcher
prefix,
that
is
the
package,
the
detector
right
and
you're
thinking
about
Chess
education,
I,
don't
think
he'll
affects
as
well
because
of
the
plugins
I.
Don't
remember
any
plugin
that
she
that
she
do
things
on
top
of
the
controller
or
big
behinds.
C
I
would
what
partial
was
saying
about
having
it's
a
way
you
can
configure
or
controller
and
API
goes
if
you
want,
but
I
think
having
a
same
default
is
good
as
well.
One
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
that,
like
with
controllers,
would
that
be
better
suited
to
go
inside
like
package
internal,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
times
when
I've
looked
at
other
operator
projects
that
have
been
created.
A
lot
of
the
times
controllers
is
something.
A
Well,
yeah,
we
can
also
shake
it
is
common
knowledge,
the
documentation
to
validity,
configure
right
change,
come
back.
Okay,
they
discuss
again
in
the
next
meeting,
but
yeah
I
have
the
same
feeling
as
well
config.
It
doesn't
go
inside
of
the
package
because
it's
not
a
goaling
stuff,
Angie
I
believe
that
people
would
you
like
to
have
cheese
layout
package
in
gpis.
To
do
one
of
the
most
situations
is:
is
that
stuff
like
if
people
want
to
expose
the
the
apis
right,
the
using
the
model
in
another
project
so
lucky?
C
D
A
Yeah
so,
but
but
I
think
we
don't
need
to
decide
right
now.
I
just
should
like
to
bring
it
to
attention
and
see.
What
do
you
think
folks
right
like
he,
because
it
I
has
no
reason
if
people
want
to
change
the
layout
change
we
have
the
alpha.
Plugging
I
was
thinking
that
right.
Why
not?
Also
we
can
go
there
and
change,
because
it's
too
much
votes
you
know
to
anyone.
B
C
A
C
A
C
A
C
A
A
D
B
A
B
C
Go
ahead,
Bryce
I'm,
just
gonna,
say
I.
Consider
that
config
directory
the
way
that
it's
set
up
kind
of
like
a
Docker
file
for
a
project,
in
the
sense
that
it's
meant
only
for
that
this
particular
project,
and
so
in
this
case
that
configuration
is
for
the
operator
or
controllers
that
are
being
created
with
Cube
Builder
and
it's
kind
of
unique
to
that
project
and
isn't
really
something
that
should
be
imported
by
another
project.
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
D
I'm
not
simple,
but
I'm
wondering
if
that
would
make
more
sense,
because
there
will
be
questions.
Issues
raised
and
I
would
like
to
have
under
package
now.
I
would
like
to
scaffold
it
under
a
separate
path,
because
I
want
to
have
this
organized
in
this
way.
So
can
we
make
it
the
other
way
around
in
the
next
Plugin
or
things
like
that?
So
it's
definitely
something
difficult
to
implement
like
not
an
easy
path
to
go
ahead,
but
I'm
thinking.
If
it's,
what
yeah.
B
I
think
there's
two
paths:
you
either
move,
do
it
to
the
letter
of
the
law
and
say:
okay,
we're
going
to
move
API
and
controllers
done.
That's
it,
no
more,
no
less
or
if
you
give
the
option
of
configurability,
you
start
to
have
the
conversation
of
okay.
How
configurable
do
I
want
this
because
I
get
I
guarantee
you
that's
the
next
request.
Whichever
way
we
go,
oh
well,
it
would
be
nice
if
I
could
do
this
and
having
the
config.
B
There
will
be
more
complicated
to
code,
but
I
think
it
starts
to
open
up
the
ability
to
put
it
wherever
you
want.
We
don't
care,
you
just
need
to
tell
us
or
because
we
gave
you
Flags.
Maybe
we
have
to
store
something
in
the
project
file
or
store
it
somewhere
so
that
we
know
where
they
are,
but
that
yeah
okay,
we
can
have
that
conversation,
but
yeah
I
think
that's
where
it's
gonna
go!
That
conversation
is
going
to
go,
I
mean.
A
I
think
allow
people
to
configure
to
be
amazing,
I,
just
I
I,
just
don't
know
how
we
could
like
it
make
your
own
plugins
be
able
to
look
at
this
configuration
right.
Should
you
be
something
like
a
game
on
file
where
we
Define
it
the
default
paths,
maybe
in
the
projection
file
we
could
see
like
have
it
an
option
to
to
track
the
layout
where,
where
is
what
right,
which
I
don't
know?
How
much
complex
would
be
that
to
to
keep
moving
and
the
other
one
only
changed.
A
He
puts
the
package
into
the
API
into
the
controllers
inside
of
the
package.
Fargo
before
shows
very
simple
right
change.
A
lot
of
people
has
been
asking
data
for
too
long,
but
I
also
think
like.
We
need
to
think
about
it.
Do
you
want
to
put
it
internal
or
not
like,
because
we
cannot
change
every
time
right,
so
we
need
to
I
think
he
has
two
things
right,
I
think
I
I
think
we
can
change
the
default
out.
A
Injury,
King
great,
is
an
issue
and
see
if
someone
would
like
to
work
in
a
proposal
for
something
configurable
right.
So
one
thing
don't
remove
the
other
option
right.
So
basically
I
I,
don't
have
your
objection
I'm
about
to
put
you
the
package
I,
don't
know
why
I
I
don't
have
any
contacts.
Why
we
don't
have
the
package
as
well,
if
I
think
about
it,
I
saw
in
many
places
that's
a
good
practice
for
going.
You
have
the
package
and
you
do
this
stuff
inside
yeah.
B
A
A
A
So
I
think
that
is
what
it
is:
I
simply
heavy
his
friends,
it's
all
software,
so
I
already
wanted
this.
One
sorry
engineer
the
the
last
one
is
about
the
configuration
right.
So
we
have
it.
His
option
is
like
here:
Alpha,
Commerce
and
I.
Don't
have
the
impression
that
people
is
actually
using
the
configuration.
A
We
also
thought
like
okay,
the
idea
was
like
we're.
Having
like
a
plug-in
configuration
in
the
people,
could
choose
between
I
was
customized
or
I
want
to
configure
it
right,
but
he
Tony
tried
to
work
in
the
plugin
and
she
I
I
shows
that
maybe
that
she's
not
so
so
possible
if
the
plugging
are
not
so
is
because
he,
if
I,
am
not
wrong
with
the
configuring
option,
you
need
the
tool
generating
the
files
for
you.
That
is
watching
the
alpha
command.
I.
Believe
that
she's
doing
do
you
like
to
speak
here
about
that
Tony?
C
So
that's
the
place
where
I
feel
it's
hard
to
migrate
it
to
as
a
plugin.
So
previously
I,
guess,
camera
and
I
have
been
discussed
a
little
bit.
If
ever
we
want
to
provide
another
sub
command,
such
as
KB
run,
so
that
we
can
casually
trigger
the
plugin,
regardless
of
the
general
sub
commands
to
scaffolder
project,
but
I'm,
not
sure
like
how
suitable
it
would
be
for
to
to
to
introduce
in
the
currents
the
Builder
pattern.
A
Yeah
yeah,
exactly
I
I,
don't
think
Queenie.
She
came
with
a
solution
here
right,
but
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
could
think
about
because,
for
example,
the
configuration
Edge
all
this
depends
right.
So
we
try
to
have
less
depth
in
says
possible
because
we
needed
to
check
the
the
license.
I
think
it
all.
These
ones
has
devices.
That
is
fine
and
it
is
done,
but
she
I
did
it
as
less
definitions
means
less
effort.
A
A
It
was
very
hard
to
to
fix
the
things
so
I
spoke
in
the
face
with
Patrick
and
about
you
like
it.
If
we
decided
to
externalize
the
configuration
you
want
to
be
okay
with
that,
he
he
is
very
okay.
He
also,
if
you,
if
you
see
dirty
people,
is
not
ignosing
your
you
know,
NGO
folks
decides
you
can
remove
as
well
and
you're
cool
with
that.
But
I
think
the
idea
is
it's
nice
right.
It
was
like
a
another
way
to
do.
A
The
things
has
a
video
with
the
demo
that
you
he
made
like
one
year
or
two
years
ago,
when
the
option
was
introduced
so
I.
My
idea
was
like
just
to
bring
ahead
and
see
like
a
fox.
What
do
you
think
he?
If
the
time
we
can
try
to
check
that
your
food
or
see
how
the
configuration
works?
We
can
try
to
do
a
pool
and
see
if
he
has
someone
that
actually
is
losing
that
or
if
you
have
something
that
you
nobody
cares.
Nobody
uses
engine
like
just
bring
it
burn
for
the
production
right.
A
B
A
So
it
has
a
demo
I.
Think
I
will
try
after
this
Mission
I'll
try
to
find
the
linking
that
you
put
here
as
well
and
the
weighing
in
Fox
every
time
you
give
a
look.
We
can
discuss
that.
It
has
no
rush
right
to
decide
she's
but
see.
Another
option
should
be
like
like
as
educate
right.
We
could
have
a
help.
That
is
the
is
like
a
com
bin
instead
of
a
Kobe
Builder,
and
we
use
a
copy.
A
Builder
like
a
configuration
music
will
be
building
our
stuff
from
Kobe
Builder
enjoy
just
remove
the
implementation
for
the
engine
stage
of
ABR
for
option
will
be
like
the
two
options
right
and
also
you
would
bring
visibility,
churches,
implementation
or
we
could
try
to
see
if
he
has
any
option
for
the
removing
for
the
plugin.
If
we
maybe
need
to
create
another
interface,
like
Tony
said
like
run
or
execute
like
it
could
be.
Building
as
a
cool
change,
then
press
something
right.
A
Properly
she's
featuring
because
I
itch
was
too
long
ago.
I
originated
to
watch
again.
The
demo
enjoy
stuff
Angel
nobody's
asking
nothing
about
stretch,
because
this
I
believe
that
nobody
is
using
right.
We
have
no
issues.
We
have
a
nobody
asking
something
about,
so
he
gave
him
angry
properly.
You
need
to
run
the
command
to
generate
the
files,
the
configs
that
we
have
in
size
of
the
the
config
directory,
but
he
the
implementation,
you
you
like
a
Putin
and
yemo.
A
Yeah
that
that's
how
I
is
one
of
the
options
right
so
Patrick
is
fine.
If
you
decide,
we
will
just
delete
change
it
and
is
that
changing?
If
you
want
to
come
back,
we
can
go
there
in
the
tag.
Take
the
code
and
try
to
put
you
back,
but
for
the
other
side,
I
felt
a
little
bit
sad
as
well
like
it,
because
he
made
a
lot
of
effort
on
teas,
Angie
I,
don't
know
if
he
like
he,
one
of
the
things
is
is
possible.
A
People
are
not
using
cheese
option
only
because
it's
hiding
the
alpha
comments
like
some
of
the
commands
of
the
two.
If
he
we
have
like
people,
try
to
use
it
as
Fuji
people
like
to
use
this
approach,
I
don't
know
all
right.
It's
one
idea
like
he
tried
to
to
do
the
things
in
another
way
and
see
what
people,
if
you
people,
would
you
like
or
not
right
so
in
today,
if
you
the
cheese
optional,
would
you
replace
the
customize,
the
config
director?
Actually
this
option
that
I
remember
replace
the
configure
detector
fully.
C
B
It's
not
widely
used,
then
having
the
tough
conversation
of
okay.
Maybe
we
need
to
deprecate,
or
at
least
you
know,
we
because
it's
Alpha,
we
could
probably
just
remove
it,
but
it
may
be
out
of
a
courtesy.
We
could
say:
hey
we're
thinking
about
deprecating
this
command
and
then
following
release
and
see
what
happens.
I
mean
I
think
it
should
be
at
least
on
the
table
as
one
of
the
options
to
type
a
conversation.
A
Yeah
because
it
my
my
personal
thought,
is
like
the
basic
thing
would
be
like
we
have
your
only
plugins
right
like
we
have
the
plugins
that
consisting
everything
is
uploading,
and
you
will
also
be
very
consistent
with
the
plugins,
because
the
plugin
is
okay.
That
is
fine.
We
could
move
for
another
project.
A
In
any
moment
we
could
say:
okay,
these
plugins
people
are
not
using
too
much
or
you
know
we
decided
we
you'll
no
longer
keeping
one
thing
and
to
be
creature,
help
when
you
leave
all
all
that,
if
the
community
watch
they
can
keep
it
maintained
right
but
see
how
much
more
people
use
it
could
be
buildersally
like
acidk,
probably
that
you
help
us
having
more
people
like.
He
contributes
me
for
the
project
right.
A
Like
a
if
it
could
be,
Builder
be
more
like
a
leap
to
create
the
tools
with
helpers
that,
like
people,
only
focusing
what
they
need
to
do
to
solve
their
needs
like
by
pluggings,
and
so
we
use
the
external
option.
Plugins
AG
inside
of
a
Kobe
Builder,
we
have
only
the
plugins
that
people
actually
really
use
ngr
very
related
to
the
pressure
changing.
You
know.
We
reduce
the
burn.
It
should
keep
the
things
maintained
as
well.
C
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
Think
the
discussion
is
better,
have
the
conversation
and
then
deter
depending
on
what
the
discussion
comes
out.
An
issue
can
get
created
in
terms
of
what
actual
work
will
be
done.
So,
in
other
words,
if
the
discussion
ends
up
being,
we
remove
a
new
issue
to
remove
it
should
be
created.
If
the
discussion
ends
up
that
it
should
be
externalized
as
a
plug-in
that
we
can
create
a
you
know,
an
issue
to
go,
handle
that
piece
so
yeah
that
makes
sense.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
I
think
always
is
possible
right.
So,
but
it's
not
something
simple,
because
addicts
starts
to
to
try
to
do
that
and
to
do
things
accomplished.
Tony
also
tried
to
move
it
forward
with
his
PR
and
digital
accomplished.
I
can
share
with
you
the
issue
that
you
will
have
to
move,
that's
for
the
plugin
and
you
know,
and
they
they
both
appearance
like
for
the
opportunity
in
the
history
as
well
like
it's
not
something
simple.