►
From YouTube: Kubernetes KubeBuilder Triage Meeting 2020:01:28
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
let's
start
today,
builder
training
meeting
today
is
26
of
january
2021.
So
don't
say
nothing
that
you
don't.
You
feel
comfortable
to
be
in
the
internet
for
the
posterity.
A
So
allow
every
commander
to
override
the
project
conflict,
the
push
configured
plugins.
A
A
B
I
haven't
looked
over
this
before.
A
B
Branch
yeah:
that's
that's
fine.
A
Yeah,
I
think
it's
fine,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
I
got
it
instead
of
humiliating,
because
today
we
have
cheese
one.
So
the
problem
here
is
just
to
have
a
better
name.
I
believe.
A
A
A
Regards
the
mind
stone:
do
you
think
this
is
a
priority?
Do
you
think
we
can
put
you
next.
B
I
don't
know
if
this
is
appropriate
for
a
milestone,
necessarily
just
because
it's
not
supposed
to
be.
It's
not.
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
No,
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
idea.
Well,
let
me
think
for
a
sec.
I
I
think
on
the
facebook
yeah,
that's
probably
a
good
idea,
but
the
tools
releases
branch
should
be
moved
to
controller
runtime,
eventually,
because
controller
on
time
requires
these
m-test
binaries.
I
think
we've
talked
about
this
a
few
times,
but
in
the
interim
we
could
probably
move
it
to
cuba,
release
tools.
A
I
think
you'll
be
easy
to
keep
you
maintained
so
far.
At
least
someone
would
like
to
take
this
one.
A
B
I
think
the
problem
is
that
whoever
a
lot
of
these
issues
are
infrastructure
issues,
and
you
need
admin
permissions
in
both
repos
to
do
this
so
as
of
right
now,
I
think
only
sully
and
philip
are
able
to
do
these
things.
A
B
B
Yeah
and
and
admin
needs
to
be
able
to
create
those,
so
I
think
some
like
these
particular
infrastructure
issues.
We
can
ping
sully
and
philip
about
this
and
just
leave
them
alone
and
leave
them
unassigned.
I
should
say.
A
B
B
A
B
Believe
what
this
is
proposing
is
before
actually
writing
anything
to
disk.
You
generate
all
these
files
in
memory,
and
you
run
a
few
checks
to
make
sure
that
you
can
actually
write
these
files,
so
you
make
sure
that,
based
on
the
create
action,
you
can
either
skip
the
writing
the
file
or
you
generate
an
error.
B
This
is,
it
seems
like
it's
akin
to
a
database
transaction
where,
if
something
bad
happens,
then
you
can
roll
back,
and
I
think
this
is
a
great
effort
because
there
are,
there
are
certain
times
when
yeah
you
try
and
run
a
command
it
fails
and
as
a
user
you're
left
with
like
a
bunch
of
files,
so
you
don't
know
how
to
clean
up.
B
A
I
agree,
I
agree
with
that
as
well.
It
doesn't,
it
doesn't
know
about
the
performance,
and
how
are
you
huge?
Do
you
know
do
that
like
if
it
was
possible?
Do
you
know
how
you
will
inform
what
you
are
the
files
to
be
checked?
If
we
can
do
something
generic
enough.
B
This
is
for
the
scaffolding
machinery,
that's
present
for
cube
builder
plugins,
and
actually
I
think
this
is
exported
as
well.
A
Okay
for
all
comments,
so
for
each
command,
you
would
need
to
to
do
two
checks
and
you
would
you
need
to
know
exactly
what
the
files
should
be
scoffed
before.
A
I
am
okay
with
that,
doesn't
know
exactly
how
the
implementation
would
you
be
in
place.
A
A
Doesn't
you
have
a
label,
but
we
can
put
it
here?
I
don't
know
if
this.
A
A
B
B
C
A
This
one's
very,
very
simple,
cheesy
user
asking
the
channel,
for
we
have
a
bunner
because
it
now
we
have
let's
see
if
they
can
help
in
here.
A
We
have
the
documentation
in
master
range
and
we
have
the
legacy
one
engine
for
wing
3.0
be
stable
and
we
release
this
table
release.
We
will
have
v1
v2
ng
master
that
should
be
related
to
v3,
so
the
user.
Would
you
like
to
have
a
burner
here,
because
it's
not
clear
enough
that
you
choose
documentations
like
little,
not
not
out
to
date,
you
say
t
in
cheese
cases
it's
out
stage,
because
everyone
is
no
longer
supported.
So
some
message
that
should
describe
that
view.
One
is
no
longer
supporting
agent
day.
A
A
Has
someone
something
some
reason
for
we
object
to
that
or
king
of
booty
trash
except.
A
C
A
A
Cheese
one
it's
a
book,
we,
everyone
is
so
in
sdk
sites.
That
motivates
when
we
do
a
change
in
query
builder,
when
we
image
a
project,
we
doesn't
allow
more
the
initial
course
if
he
in
the
director
has
a
other
directors
or
other
files,
because
we
cannot
ensure
that
the
two
will
be
able
to
do
this
call
forward
properly.
A
We
found
some
users
doing
things
that
caused
problems,
and
it
was
a
little
bit
problematic.
So
we
wait.
It
is
really
like
the
comments.
You
can
work
jesse
if
he
has
a
goal
mode
or
the
file
starts
with
he
dots
because
he
gets
commands
things
like
that,
and
we
have.
A
A
This
one
is
more
to
try
candied
in
the
master
branch.
We
judge
some
modifications
in
the
how
the
things
works
in
the
internal
codes.
Agb
force
is
changed.
The
resources,
the
resource
structure,
has
a
function
to
create
a
new
resource
in
the
function
to
validate
the
the
resource
that
she
was
created.
A
A
We
need
that
cdk
be
able
to
create
a
resource
and
to
validate
the
resource,
not
exactly
specific
for
gold,
because
we
use
it
is
for
ansible
and
any
other
projects.
Could
you
use
it
for
any
other
language
as
well?
So
this
is
more
something
like
to
fix
the
structure
and
you
move
the
things
around.
A
C
So
this
is
moving,
I'm
not
completely
familiar
with
the
code,
but
it
sounds
like
the
old
way.
There
was
an
options
structure
that
was
filled
in
by
the
command
line.
It
would
take
those
values,
it
would
do
the
validation
from
the
cli
portion,
but
also
for
those
specific
items
as
well.
So
it
did
both,
and
this
is
breaking
it
apart,
so
that
cli
validation
is
done
and
then
you've
got
resource
validation,
which
is
slightly
separate.
Is
that
what
yeah.
A
A
Yeah,
because
before
we
had
the
resource
here
andrew,
we
had
our
options
here
that
she
was
using
for
the
flags
and
the
cheese
was
changed
engine.
Now.
If
we
came
here
plugins
we
have
a
specific
option
for
the
go
link
to
show
that
it
has
the
validation
we
need
likey.
I
want
a
new
resource
from
kobe
builder
rules
and
she,
following
all
rules
that
she
is
valid
for,
will
be
builder
because
the
resources
something
defined
in
kobe
build,
and
I
want
to
validate
his
resource
so
yeah.
A
It's
just
like,
as
you
said,
to
just
clean
up,
fix
a
design
and
design
a
change,
yeah
cool.
A
A
C
So
this
is
back
to
the
first
one
right
yeah
I
figured
I
just
read
it
and
my
understanding
is.
It
sounded
like
the
description
says
that
if
I
run
a
command
with
dash
dash
plugin
that
they
want
it
so
that
it
uses
that
plug-in
as
an
override
versus
whatever
is
configured
in
the
config
file,
for
that
particular
run,
and
it's
typical
of
flags
to
me
to
usually
be
used
for
overriding
things.
So
if
I
had
a
command
line-
and
I
gave
it
a
flag,
I
usually
expect
it
to
use
that
flag.
C
A
Exactly
yeah
for
me,
I
didn't
get
the
motivation
as
well,
because
if
you
will
be
able
to
overhand
cheese
value,
how
we
know
what
was
the
layout
to
use
it
just
the
first
time
to
sculpt
food
to
the
project,
because
the
idea
is
we
having
the
project,
config
tracking,
trackage,
everything
that
was
done.
You
know
before
we
are
able
to
troubleshoot
before
we
are
able
to
recreate
the
project
in
the
future.
C
C
Whatever
that,
I
think
the
second
paragraph
was
trying
to
describe
what
the
motivation
was.
Oh
no,
maybe
it's
the
one
that
says.
Let's
say
that
we
create
a
plugin
that
modifies
controller.go
file
to
insert
inside
the
reconcile
function,
some
scaffold
code
and
or
you
may
want
to
use
this
plugin
for
some
of
the
controllers
generated.
A
All
of
them,
for
me,
is
two
not
very
clear.
What
do
you
think
about?
We
live?
It
is
one
because
agility
usually
is
here.
We
can
ping
him
and
he
trying
driving.
A
A
C
A
C
C
C
A
A
A
Yeah
here
has
yes
much
proposal.
I
didn't
saw
that.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
so
it's
okay,
I
think
we
can
check
the
release
for
the
next
release
for
the
next
release.
We
actually
have
three
things,
one
of
them.
A
I
can
show
in
the
test
data
here
so
if
he
has
a
controller,
the
details
of
the
api,
the
path
the
domain
so
folks,
it
would
be
nice
if
you
get
your
help
to
to
check
this
one.
The
other
thing
that
request
is
doing
it's
making
the
process
verizon
three
alpha
two
stable
one,
and
then
after
that,
after
that,
the
only
thing
that
we
need
to
do.
A
Is
finished,
the
migration
dock
has
opened,
which
probably
you
hackers
changed
after
that
as
well,
and
today
I
think
we
are
done
very
good
for
the
next
release.
A
Someone
would
like
to
put
something
say
something
about
that
or
raises
unconsant
or
racism
issue
that
should
be
added
here
for
the
next
release,
for
you
will
make
a
stable
version
for
the.