►
From YouTube: Kubernetes KubeBuilder Triage Meeting 2020/12/15
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Okay,
the
first
one.
A
Okay,
we
have
not
just
cheesy
user,
but
another
one's
requesting
before
we
updated
the
image
of
the
the
copy
proxy.
A
That
you
will
use
came
from
this
project.
We
don't
have
the
automatic
process
to
build
the
image
and
push
to
the
google
cloud
before
we
are
able
to
put
you
in
the
process.
So
the
first
thing
that
you
really
need
to
do-
that
was
language
was
looking
for
see
if
we
can
automate
this
process.
So
when
a
new
release
image
in
the
in
the
project,
the
views,
the
image
you
push
automatically.
A
Here
has
all
explanations
and
didn't
have
time
enough
to
check
how
we
can
automate
it,
but
she
I
shall
hear
the
workflow
that
is
usage
in
the
hippo,
so
you
can
just
push
the
image,
bring
a
new
tag.
D
Yeah
well,
basically,
we
already
did
it
for
version
2..
I
think
we
can
close
this
one.
D
We
already
have
it
for
version
3
and
also
for
version
2..
There
is
a,
I
don't
think,
there's
the
release
done
yet,
but
the
the
pull
request
that
affects
this
issue
is
already
submitted
and
unmerged
in
the
say
in
the
version
two
brands.
So
I
think
that
we
can
close
this
one.
A
So
it
should
be
close,
it
is
now
or
just
when
we
manage
the
changing
individual
range.
D
A
A
One
I
understand
that
the
user
would
like
to
to
add
a
plugin
in
what
we
use
to
do
the
documentation
to
allow
export
to
the
docs
in
pdf
format.
A
A
C
Help
want
help
wanted
and
and
just
move
on
unless
anybody
has
a
particularly
intense
desire
to
work
on
it.
It
looks
like
from
the
comment
there's
some
work
to
do
and
I
don't
think
it's
particularly
high
priority
at
the.
B
A
A
A
D
I
think
the
problem
with
this
one
is
the
same
that
we
have
been
mentioned
in
past
meetings,
where
we
don't
really
want
to
replace
parts
of
code
that
have
already
been
scaffolded,
because
we
don't
know
if
the
user
already
modified
something
there.
So
I
think
the
problem
here
is:
if
we
want
to
enable
or
disable
it
automatically
with
with
a
command,
we
would
have
to
change
part
in
main,
and
we
can't
assure
that
the
user
hasn't
changed
it.
So
I
think
that's
the
main
issue
with
this.
One.
E
Yeah
I
mean
in
general,
like
once
you
scaffold
something
I
I
like
the
idea
of
just
having
the
user
being
able
to
own
and
customize
the
whole
project
and
builder,
making
as
few
assumptions
about
what
the
project
structure
looks
like
after
that
as
possible,
and
who
knows
what
they
might
have
changed
in
the
meantime.
Here
I
mean
like
you've
listed
here.
Making
changes
to
disable
component
is
pretty
straightforward.
E
It's
only
uncommenting
and
commenting
a
few
lines,
and
I
think
the
tutorial
for
enabling
component
config
goes
through
pretty
thoroughly
what
you
need
to
do
to
enable
it
so
disabling.
It
should
be
just
the
reverse
of
that.
A
Okay,
so
this
one
yeah,
I
I
think
he
may
be
the
main
you'll
be
hard
to
update.
If
someone
customizes
your
face
the
problems,
the
others
know
no,
but
I
agree
that
she's
not
just
so
hard
to
do
motherly
via
the
tutorial.
So
I
think
it's
fine,
we
close
cheese
one.
B
D
If
I
don't
remember
wrong,
I
think
that
the
force
option
will
only
bypass
the
check
where
we
work.
Basically,
when
we
want
to
scaffold
a
new
api,
we
were
checking
if
that
api
was
already
tracked
in
the
in
the
project
config
file
and
the
force
flag.
The
only
thing
that
does
is
skipping
that
check,
but
if
we
want
to
scaffold
files
that
are
already
present,
there's
gonna
be
issues,
and
I
don't
know
how
we
can
solve
that.
A
A
D
B
B
A
Okay,
this
one,
I
already
said
it
just
before
we
decided
if
he
we
should
support
the
plugins
one
person
behind
your
two
versions
behind
and
today
documented
that
I
don't
know.
Do
you
think
that
this
cheese
is
something
that
we
should
bring
in
the
other
meeting,
or
would
you
like
to
discuss
anything
here.
A
A
C
A
A
A
He
has
another
issue
as
well,
for
you
we
put
to
the
help
it
doesn't.
You
know
if
the
regime
is
required,
if
we,
you
know
using
edger
help
in
the
mid
file.
So
what
do
you
think
folks?
D
C
I'm
I'm
kind
of
of
a
similar
mindset.
I
think
we
should.
I
think
it
might
be
worth
like
adding
a
message
to
the
end
of
the
scaffolding
process.
That
says
like
run,
make
help
or
or
check
out
the
book
for
more
information
but
like
just
so
that
we
make
it
obvious
that
make
help
is
there
but
yeah.
I
I
kind
of
agree.
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
Now,
she's
the
one,
the
next
one
it's
about,
she
use
the
index
field,
so
we
have
the
documents
she's
getting
indexer
here
has:
where
is
this
foundation?
I
believe
it's
on
the
top
here.
Has
the
explanation
about
you
why
it
is
adding
it's
march
or
which
mice
and
show
how
talk
tomorrow
is
the
scenario
of
the
tutorial,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
I
got
watching
the
user
are
looking
for
it.
You
know.
C
C
C
I
kind
of
feel
like
we
should
probably
do
that.
Okay,
I
I'll
probably
bring
this
up
at
the
main
meeting,
but
we
also
might
just
want
to
consider
turning
on
discussions,
because
that
is
something
we
can
turn
on
now
and
just
migrating
support
into
discussions
there
once
you
turn
them
on.
I
think
there's
a
button
that
lets.
You
just
flip
an
issue
into
a
discussion
or
vice
versa.
I
think.
B
A
F
H
E
Yeah
the
kubr
are
back
proxy.
Is
a
nice
solution
to
protecting
the
metrics
endpoint.
E
I
was
just
supposing
a
network
policy
as
a
replacement
for
that,
because
it's
okay,
it's
native
resource
and
just
requires
you
to
scaffold
a
manifest
that
specifies
controller
manager
pods
and
prevents
ingress
from
any
pod
outside
of
the
control.
Manager's
namespace.
E
The
drawback
here
is:
if
you
don't
have
the
what
is
it
some
particular
network
plug-in
that
supports
network
policies,
then
this
won't
work.
I
guess
the
the
counterpoint
is,
if
you're,
using
a
different
network
plug-in,
do
you
care
about
restricting
network
access
to
pods?
E
C
E
Not
exactly
better
it's
different,
and
it
also
reduces
the
number
of
dependencies
that
we
have
on
external
projects
and,
I
think,
reduces
the
complexity
of
the
overall
build
their
project,
because
you
users,
don't
have
to
think
about
configuring.
This
whole,
like
kubernetes,
proxy
thing
and
learning
about
how
to
use
that
or
remove
it.
If
you
want
to
remove
the
network
policy,
then
you
can
just
comment
out
some
like
customized
resource
line.
E
D
C
Okay,
let's,
let's
mark
this
as
like,
I
guess
triage
accepted
and
then
just
write
down.
We
should
discuss
it
in
a
meeting.
A
A
Cheese,
one
was
ident
by
myself.
It's
waiting
for,
we
have
aj
skull,
forge
a
target
should
link
to
the
projects
that
are
built
with
the
two
each
of
us.
We
have
a
issue
where
which
was
closed
by
the
boat,
but
she
was
done
a
long
time
ago
asking
the
same
because
he,
if
you're,
trying
to
lynch,
apparently
maybe
if
you
try
to
lynch
the
projects
that
shall
build
you
if
the
two
they
are
not
in
passing
now.
A
So,
if
you
we
edge
the
links,
we
can
provide
the
cheese
feature
for
the
users,
help
them
for
language
practices
and
today
also
ensure
automatically
by
the
ci
that
the
projects
the
scout
folds
is
limited.
You
know
what
do
you
think
folks.
D
I
think
we
I
we
already
talked
about
this
in
in
one
of
the
pull
requests
in
one
of
the
issues.
The
thing
about
adding
a
gold
land
ceiling
to
the
scaffolded
project
has
an
issue
in
that
we
are
supporting
a
third
party
library
for
the
scaffolded
projects,
and
that
would
be
an
issue
in
case
any
other
linter
wants
to
to
also
add
it
its
own.
So
I
think
there
are
some
repercussions
over
there.
It's
not
the
same
as
if
we
use
it
for
our
internal
use,
but
we
are
scaffolding
it
for
projects
for
for
users.
D
A
Okay,
so
just
return
to
culture.
The
problem
and
the
consent
is
like
the
super
tillage,
because
they
we
would.
You
need
to
support
the
golden
signage,
so
I
catch
that
ion
make
a
note
for
me,
and
she
puts
this
summary
after
and
judging
the
other
michigan
as
well.
A
A
What
about
we
integrate
through
automatically
the
projects
leaving
the
east
coast
to
integrate
automatically
covers?
A
If
you
choose
to
be
good,
or
maybe
a
plugin
after
the
second
phase,
to
provide
that
shows
that
you'd
be
nicer
to
game,
but
also
spoke
about
to
use
another
one
which
is
they
called
the
kodak
watches
the
other
project,
it's
cheese,
one.
No,
I
could
call
io.
C
B
D
One
of
the
things
that
we
mentioned
in
the
discussion
that
in
case
we
this
can
be
done
easily
with
a
plugin
and
the
plugin
shouldn't,
be
hosted
by
us
as
a
couple
as
the
cover
builder
owners,
but
as
the
owners
of
the
hosted
service.
For
example.
If
coveralls
wants
to
have
a
plugin
that
does
this,
we
can
help
them
develop
the
plugin.
It
would
be
really
easy,
but
they
it
should
be
their
responsibility
and
not
ours.
A
D
I
haven't
used
any
of
them
outside
of
cube
builder,
so
I
don't
have
a
strong
opinion,
but
I've
heard
people
is
moving
migrating
towards
the
other
one,
like
I
don't
know
the
reasons,
but
also,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
core
ranger
also
suggested
it
was
the
one
suggesting
the
other
one.
So
I
don't
know
the
reasons,
but
I
think
people
are
migrating
and
we
should
study
it
at.
A
Least,
okay,
so
anyway,
would
you
not
be
because
it
I
would
like
to
you
know,
provide
some
helpers
to
users
see
if
we
could
provide
some
helpers
because
he
decides
to
be
so
simple
for
his
discount
food?
A
C
A
A
A
I
give
you
a
look
in
both
shows
that
the
covers
is
still
the
most
used,
but
I
saw
a
lot
of
people
saying
good
things
about
cheese,
one,
but
I
I
never
tried
to
use
it.
So
I
don't
know
the
educators.
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
need
to
finish
this
one.
It's
very
simple:
I'm
not
saying
that
some
files
that
we
have
we
measure
the
files
without
the
license,
so
it
should
be
just
to
put
a
check
to
ensure
in
the
ci
that
you
end
in
your
file
has
the
license
header.
A
C
Seems
reasonable,
I
would
just
mark
it
as
help
wanted
and
entry
is.
C
Sure
we
could
actually,
we
might
just
want
to
migrate
this
to
the
q
builder
potentially
to
the
keyboard
release
tools
repo.
So
we
can
just
use
this
across
all
of
our
reposts
actually
yeah.
D
C
D
Sure
the
only
thing
guys,
the
only
difficulty
I
see
there
is
a
both
actions
in
the
same
repo
will
be
having
this
a
problem
with
the
versions
or
I
mean
maybe
one
updates
and
needs
a
version
update,
and
that
will
cause
the
other
action
to
have
a
version
update
without
having
any
change
or
something
like
that.
I'm
not
sure
how
we
can
handle
multiple
actions
with
separate.
C
We
can
also
just
put
the
script
in
there
and
just
be
like
copy
the
script
in
two.
At
any
rate,
I
think
this
would
be
useful.
A
Before
the
v3
alpha
to
install,
if
you're
going
the
quick
start
to
install
the
copy
builder
install
the
kobe
builder,
then
we
download
the
binaries
that
are
required
for
the
infotainment
globally
and
you
need
solo
permissions
to
installing
this
place.
Okay
and
then,
when
we
run
the
tests
in
the
idea
or
outside
of
the
making
file
targets
we
are
able
to,
they
will
work
because
the
binaries
are
globally.
But
you
know
this
doesn't
work
outside
of
the
making
file
tests,
which
is
like
a
bug
of
regression.
A
A
So
a
second
option
that
you
will
cover
all
could
be
a
follow-up,
something
that
we
can
discuss.
We
can't
manage
to
choose
one
and
solve
it
any
problem,
and
if
you
swing
one
face
the
problems
just
to
say,
run
the
make
attention
get
to
the
binaries
enjoying
having
fun.
A
However,
it
is,
in
my
opinion,
is
not
very
understandable,
so
it's
hard
for
the
users
keep
in
mountain
after
this
cup
folds
made.
A
E
So
I
have
some
opinions
on
on
this,
but
would
anybody
else
like
to
discuss
what
theirs
are?
First.
A
It's
clear
I
could,
could
I
explain,
they
showed
the
problem,
it's
clear
for
everybody.
D
A
Yes,
we
need
to
run
the
make
dash
into
the
make
it
with
the
make
test
is
works
because
we
have.
It
is
part
here,
setup
invitations
that
you
force
the
path
of
the
binaries
in
the
vivar,
but
it
is
it's
not
in
the
code,
so
it's
touching
the
scalp
code.
So
when
you
run
the
test
is
outside
of
the
making
file
target,
the
invertex
is
unable
to
know
the
path
to
find
the
binaries
interior
failure
with
each.
A
E
So
I
I
think
the
the
tooling
approach
is
interesting.
I
actually
didn't
see
that
I
would
just
like
to
point
out
that
all
of
these
dependencies
that
we're
talking
about
right
here
are
specific
to
amp
test,
which
is
controller,
runtime
owned
and
I've.
I've
mentioned
this
in
the
past,
but
I
I
think
that
this
should
be
a
controller
runtime
issue
and
there
should
be
a
library
around
handling
the
installation
and
usage
of
these
binaries.
E
A
E
A
C
A
But
today
it
is
means
of
the
day
to
contract
runtime
change,
how
the
things
works
there.
It
starts
to
release
the
binaries
from
there.
The
startup
profiles
change
the
implementation
to
instead
of
look
for
this
place.
Looking
they
go
path.
First,
they
change
the
kobe
builder
to
install
the
binaries
using
the
gear
implementation,
the
controller
on
time
to
install
in
the
indigo
passers
or
in
the
beginning
of
the
project.
A
So
it
cannot
be
done
now
and
the
user
is.
Do
you
know
the
my
my
concern?
You
know
about
synchronizing
the
things
in
the
control
different
time
is
the
maintenance
village
who
uses.
This
is
the
kobe
builder
so,
every
time
that
we
need
to
change,
we
need
to
change
the
control
over
time
and
they
push
it
for
the
kobe
builder
to
test
and
they
wait
a
controllable
time
release
to
sheets
in
the
two.
A
So
I
I'm
not
just
completely
in
favor
to
move
to
the
control
runtime,
which
I
see
the
points
to
move
as
well.
However,
I
think
we
need
to
provide
a
solution
for
three
v3
alpha.
Do
you
know
otherwise,
because
of
the
users
is
still
a
lot
with?
Indeed,
a
survey
in
geology
users
believe
that
it's
not
possible
to
urban
future
debug
the
tests,
because
I
believe
that
is
because
of
this
issue.
A
We
did
just
survey
in
cjk
site
and
a
common
one
of
the
common
things
that
today
the
users
raised
was
like.
I
don't
like
to
troubleshoot
and
to
debug
the
tests
and
entertaining.
I
believe
that
it
is
the
scenario
you
know,
because
if
he
we
created
the
project
and
you
come
back
in
the
issue,
if
I
created
a
project,
go
there
in
the
in
the
switch
test
and
she
asked
to
the
bug
in
the
idea-
I
don't
face
it
ever
so
I
believe
that
it
cheeses.
A
C
I
think
okay,
so
I
think
first
of
all,
kind
of
in
order.
I
think
if
we
can
get
away
with
less
scaffolded
code
and
more
library
code,
I
would
prefer
that
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
would
prefer
doing
this
in
controller
runtime,
if
possible,
if
if
it's
just
like
like,
if
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
idea
to
try
to
load
from
go
bin
just
kind
of
globally,
and
so
I
think
like
we
could
make
controller
runtime
do
that.
C
I
think
I
think
we
can
also
probably
like
in
the
short
term.
I
think,
instead
of
changing
what
we
scaffold
out
like
code
wise,
we
could
maybe
add
a
message
or
add
some
help
or
something
like
like.
If
the
problem
here
is,
I
don't
know
what
to
do.
When
I
see
this
error
message,
that's
an
indication
that
we
should
be
changing
the
error
message
right
like
or
like
at
the
very
least
right
like
this
is
a
valid
error
message.
This
is,
I
don't
know
where
the
control
plane
binaries
are.
C
Did
you
put
them
in
the
right
place
right
like
and
and
so
it,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
we
make
it
so
that
this
error
message
doesn't
appear,
which
I
think
is
worthwhile
doing
in
some
capacity,
we
should
probably
also
make
it
so
that
this
error
message
is
more
intelligible.
If
you
don't
think
it's
intelligible.
A
Yes,
but
do
you
think
that
you'll
be
is
there
for
the
users?
No
what's
happening,
oh
with
everything,
I
don't
know
where
the
binaries
are
they.
They
actually
know
that
today,
because
you're
using
binaries
or
she's,
it's
like
a
cheaper
knowledge.
Do
you
know
what
she
I
trying
to
to
share?
They
know
because
imagining
I
I
mean
I
use
it.
I
just
digestion
installation,
the
kobe
builder
so
far,
I'd
be
able
to
learn
how
to
develop
detaches
and
to
debug
the
test.
A
I
in
my
idea,
I
don't
need
to
know
that
your
input
is
in
the
code,
implementation,
the
controller
on
time
use
binaries,
and
I
need
to
set
these
binaries
in
some
place
and
they
know
how
to
to
look
at
the
contemporary
time
the
documentation
she's.
Looking
for
what
options
I
have
to
pass
to
place.
So
it's
too
hard.
You
know,
hey.
A
I
I
will
make
a
note
here
so
so
I
I
raised
some
issues
there
like
we
have
the
issue
for
making
the
global
in
the
goal
path,
changing
the
difficulty
looking
for
in
the
goal,
path,
search
there
in
the
goal,
path.
Being
sorry
and
joey
can
put
another
issue
out
to
improve
the
her
message
by
sure
I
agree
with
that.
E
I'm
okay
going
over
this
really
quickly.
What
what
is
this
referring
to?
Is
this
referring
to
m
test
binary
version?
I
think
so
well.
In
that
case
it
did
just
get
bumped
in
cube.
Sorry
in
controller
on
time,
zero,
seven,
zero!
It
is
119.,
so
I
think
this
can
be
closed
out
if
they're
using
the
v3
plugin.
That
is.
C
Okay,
can
you
can
you
double
check
that
camilla
and
then
we
can
close
this
just
like.
A
A
One
about
to
choose
one
just
to
qualify:
shacky.
Sorry-
and
she
probably
are
your
comments
here-
angie.
If
it's
done
your
clothes,
no
problem,
and
it's
that
it's
done
for
today,
really
thank
you
for
all
your
collaboration
and
your
help.
Folks,
the
next
one
I
think
it's
very
cancelled
because
you'll
be
in
the
holidays.
In
the
middle
of
the
holidays
week,
you
shine
not
wrong.
C
Yeah,
that
seems
like
a
good
plan
yeah
and
you
can
go
ahead
and
close
the
119
one,
the
the
assets
branch
has
119.2.
I
just
checked.
A
We
did
thank
us
for
your
help.
I
could
not
do
that.
Angie
happy
excellency
christmas
and
new
year.
Folks.