►
From YouTube: Kubernetes KubeBuilder Meeting 202002112
Description
KubeBuilder Meeting for 2020/02/12. See https://sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder for more details.
A
All
right,
this
is
the
kubernetes
cube
builder
and
controller
runtime
and
controller
tools.
Meeting
for
what
days
today,
I
should
have
looked
at
that
before
wednesday
february
12th
of
2020.
A
Just
a
reminder,
this
meeting
is
being
recorded
and
will
be
uploaded
to
youtube,
so
don't
say
anything
that
you
don't
want
recorded
for
all
of
time,
all
right
and
with
that
we'll
get
started.
So
I
think
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
today
is
from
vince,
so
vince.
Why
don't
you
take
it
away.
B
Sure,
thanks
sally
yeah,
I
have
a
few
items
today.
So
the
first
one
is
the
controller
runtime
release,
so
I've
been
trying
like
from
claustrophobia
perspective,
we're
like
a
heavy
user
of
controller
runtime
tools
and
tube
builder
and
we're
currently
blocking
crt
v1
as
we're
trying
to
push
the
controller
runtime
release,
given
that
we
update
it
to
117
a
few
days
ago.
I
believe
would
that
be
something
that
like
we
could
do
today
or
like
if
folks
want
to
have
more
changes
in.
Please
speak
up.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
can.
I
think
we
can
do
that
today,
I'll
ping
me
on
slack
and
we
can
block
out
some
time
if
anybody's
interested
in
seeing
how
the
release
actually
ends
up
going.
It's
pretty
quick,
especially
for
new
major
version
bumps,
so
I
can
give
a
little
tutorial
and
I
think,
most
of
it's
recorded
in
our
documentation,
but
in
case
people
are
curious
to
see
what
it
looks
like
in
real
time.
C
A
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
good
idea.
I
didn't
realize
it
hadn't
been
fixed,
fixed
up
yeah.
I
will
take
a
look.
Can
you
drop
a
link
to
that
in
the
meeting
notes
or
or
something
yep
I'll?
Do
that
and
all
I'll
try
to
take
a
look
before
we
do
the
release.
B
Sounds
good.
I
have
also
the
next
one,
and
I
wanted
like
to
to
see
like
if,
if
folks
are
interested
to
have
like
a
more
frequent
meeting
for
controller
runtime
tools
and
queue
builder,
I
can
send
out
a
doodle
to
see
if,
like
we
have
availability,
but
if
folks
think
that,
like
monthly,
is
okay
like
I'm,
also
fine
with
that,
it
just
feels
like
a
little
bit
like
a
long
time
from
the
last
meeting.
Given
the
honor
changes
that
we
put
in.
B
All
right,
I
hear
no
objection
so
I'll,
send
out
a
doodle,
cube
builder
book
group
and
see
if
we
can
find
like
time
for
a
bi-weekly
meeting.
B
I
think
so
I
think
from
from
my
perspective,
like
the
there's,
like
a
bunch
of
like
pr's
in
flight
and
like
issues
in
the
backlog
that
we
can
like
groom
like
as
we
go
like
we're
doing
in
cluster
api
and
trying
trying
to
bring
the
same
processes
which
have
worked
really
well
so
yeah.
Like
kind
of
the
same
meeting
like
a
more
a
little
bit
more
structure
in
terms
of
grooming
but
yeah,
I
think
it
would
benefit
the
project.
A
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
probably
worth
it
to
still
do
one
at
least
one
kind
of
free
form,
just
like
people
add
things
to
the
agenda
and
we
talk
about
whatever
but
yeah
having
having
a
grooming
and
a
little
bit
more
coordination,
as
the
project
goes
in
terms
of
people
being
able
to
say,
like
yeah
I'll,
take
a
look
at
that
or
or
whatever
and
having
kind
of
open
triage,
I
think,
would
be
nice.
As
you
said,
cluster
api.
Does
this
sig
api
machinery
also
does
this
as
well?
A
So
I
think
it's
probably
going
to
be
a
useful
thing
to
try
out.
B
Sounds
good
I
was
planning
to
which
is
the
next
agenda
item
like
do
like
a
first
backlog
grooming
for
controller
runtime
next
week.
B
Unfortunately,
this
week
is
a
little
busy
because
we're
trying
to
do
our
seat
zero
so
like
I'm
all
over
the
place
and
like
so
like,
maybe
mid
or
end
of
next
week,
I'll
shoot
an
invite
in
the
cubicle
their
channel
to
see
like
if
folks
are
interested
to
do
it
together,
and
that
could
be
like
our
first
one
and
then,
as
we
learn
like,
we
might
change
things
up
a
little
bit.
C
Vince,
if
you
want
me,
so
I
think
I'm
the
one
that
sent
the
invite
out
for
this
meeting.
So
if
you,
if
we
get
to
the
point
where
we
want
to
change
the
anything
about
this
one,
just
let
me
know-
and
I
can
try
to
do
that,
otherwise
we
can
set
up
a
new
meeting.
Invite
if
we're
going
to
do
things
separately
so
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
I'm
the
one
that
created
this
one
in
case
we
want
to
change
it.
B
Thank
you
sounds
good.
I
think
for
next
one
we'll
do
one
separate,
because
we
still
don't
know
like
well
one,
how
many
things
we
have
in
the
backlog.
I
guess
a
lot
until
like
if
we
want
to
change
like
a
do
the
grooming
as
part
of
this
meeting,
I
feel
like
the
first
one
or
two
like
will
probably
be
separate,
and
then
we
can
incorporate
them,
have
the
free
form
and
the
grooming
at
the
end.
B
A
You
all
right
does
anyone
else?
Have
anything
they'd
like
to
talk
about
today.
D
I'm
not
sure
if
yeah
eric,
if
you
have
anything,
I
guess
I
can
give
an
update
quickly
on
plug-in
stuff.
So
adrian
gave
another
review
of
the
phase
one
implementation
of
the
plugins,
which
is
in
being
merged
into
the
electric
boogaloo,
the
branch
first
and
he's
more
or
less
given
it
the
lgtm.
D
A
Yeah,
I
think,
last
time
I
looked
at
it
from
my
perspective,
it
was
pretty
good
to
go.
Let
me
know
when
you're
ready
for
an
approval,
because
I
think
we
already
have
a
number
of
good
reviewers
on
there.
So
I'll
give
it
another
glance
and
then
we
can
get
it.
D
Yeah,
that's
great,
and
then
I
I've
also
posted
the
two
follow-ups
that
I'm
gonna
do
that
have
to
do
with
version
format,
enforcement
and
the
fully
qualified
name
changes,
and
I've
already
got
those
two
things
figured
out.
I
just
need
to
post
pr's
after
this
big
one
has
been
merged.
A
Oh
for
for
anyone
I
feel
like
I
should
give
some
context.
I
don't
know
if
we
talked
about
this
last
time
or
if
it
was
after
the
meeting
so
phase
one
phase,
two
so
phase,
one
of
the
the
plug-ins
kind
of
work
is
just
gonna
be
getting
what
was
talked
about
initially
in
the
plugins
proposal
that
we
merged
in
the
plugins
design
and
then
kind
of
phase
two
is
going
to
be
working
on
support.
A
So
so
that's
that's
just
kind
of
like
basic
like
you
can
choose
a
single
alternate
scaffolding
kind
of
type,
so
so
the
default
built-ins
ones
will
be
like
the
go
version.
One
scaffolding
and
the
go
version,
two
scaffolding
and
then
potentially,
you
can
choose
to
build
a
different
version
of
q
builder
that
has
additional
plugins
that
that
add
different
types
of
scaffolding.
A
Phase
two
is
going
to
be
to
take
that
and
work
in
external
plugins
and
and
kind
of
pipelining
plug-ins.
So
if
you
want
to
have
like
additive
plugins
that
say
add
you
know,
add
bazel,
build
rules
or
scaffold
out
an
additional
file
that
is
commonly
used
by
your
organization
or
whatever
inside
your
workflows.
A
D
A
A
All
right,
hopefully
see
you
all
next
week
for
our
first
experiment
with
community
backlog,
grooming
and
otherwise
see
you
in
a
few
weeks.
Looking.